New
What did you think of this episode?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this episode. If you want to discuss future events or theories, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Oct 13, 2017 1:38 PM
#52
It was to be expected, but yeah, this is better than the original. Hermes is awesome. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Oct 13, 2017 1:49 PM
#53
bdsbff said: I wondered about this too, although Kino added some conditions to his rules, it's partially the same : https://i.imgur.com/Msfd75z.jpgThe new rule Kino gave wasn't even the same. |
Oct 13, 2017 2:07 PM
#54
Wonderful opening. Great episode again,but I got say that I liked the older version of this overall a bit more, even tho the new one also got a few things which were done better. |
One Piece episode 914 & 915 & 1027 were a mistake and 957 brought the salvation - FMmatron |
Oct 13, 2017 2:09 PM
#55
I feel like i'm better off watching this without knowing the original cause this was really interesting to me and i understood what happened (saw the kill king coming as soon as Kino said he won't yield after he kills somebody in this country). Climax was really good. People are saying it was terrible, you guys are pretty biased, aren't you? |
Oct 13, 2017 2:14 PM
#56
The colosseum arc was my favourite in the original series. For those who haven't already I do suggest checking it out because this episode was garbage in comparison! The original adaptation had this as a two parter. Each of the duels were longer with Kino facing a large number of formidable opponents. She was left in a bind at times and needed to rely on strategy in order to win. Not only that we also bear witness to the king as a character; a psycho power hungry dictator, and the divided society that he created. It gave Kino a good reason for deciding to kill him. In comparison this episode skipped these important parts and made Kino look like she killed the King and created chaos for no particular reason. The fight scenes were short in comparison; Kino never seemed to be in any sense of danger as she was beating her opponents effortlessly. Overall this wasn't a good episode; it had none of the morals and excitement of the original. |
Bondrewd did nothing wrong. |
Oct 13, 2017 2:14 PM
#57
kinda disappointed because the remake of the episode wasn't as good as the original :( |
"Even if it has good reviews, if I don't like it then it is shit" -Some random anime character |
Oct 13, 2017 2:14 PM
#58
Smudy said: I feel like i'm better off watching this without knowing the original cause this was really interesting to me and i understood what happened (saw the kill king coming as soon as Kino said he won't yield after he kills somebody in this country). Climax was really good. People are saying it was terrible, you guys are pretty biased, aren't you? The original was better, no argument. It was two episodes long. It didn't skip the fights. It fully showed the oppression and slavery of the country. It explained the king's derangement. This was terrible. |
SaitoInuOct 13, 2017 2:20 PM
Oct 13, 2017 2:34 PM
#59
Wait, so did Kino seriously just spark a massive murderfest between all men women and children because of that couple from the beginning? That's....pretty hardcore, to be honest. |
Oct 13, 2017 2:39 PM
#60
sirflimflam said: Wait, so did Kino seriously just spark a massive murderfest between all men women and children because of that couple from the beginning? That's....pretty hardcore, to be honest. No, Kino only sparked a murderfest between the upper class citizens. The lower class is protected. You could say they deserve it, considering they're a bunch of hedonistic slave owners. |
Oct 13, 2017 3:22 PM
#61
This episode is a great example of how bland the new adaptation is in direct comparison with the 2003 version. I could forgive a tasteless color palette or generic Kino's redisign aka emotionless doll or even freakin CGI Hermes, but this.. No words, just tears. Hopefully they will show more new stories, so there woould be atleast some volue in this adaptation. |
Oct 13, 2017 3:43 PM
#62
damn kino i expected his new rule would be to appoint the kings son as the new leader but that suprised me, also the irony with hermes getting caught off guard because the dog riku talked lmao |
Facta Non Verba |
Oct 13, 2017 3:46 PM
#63
That felt really rushed compared to the original and a lot of content was left out. Also they basically showed nothing of the fights which were pretty cool in the original. Well, this was bound to happen when two episodes is fit into one. At least they shouldn't be able to rush any more episodes because iirc that was the only two episodes story in the original. |
Oct 13, 2017 3:49 PM
#64
oh what a nice anime i really wanted this kind of MC still how they are dumb enough to kill eachother, oosama ni natta toshite mo hitorikiri ja oosama ni natta kachi ga nainjanai ka yo hontouni bakabakashi |
Oct 13, 2017 4:02 PM
#65
it's was a great episode , I Don't know why but I prefer this one :D The old 2 episode was great too but in this ep kino ohhh my god kino was so cool and badass :D |
Oct 13, 2017 4:11 PM
#66
And here goes another 4/5. I don't think the episode was rushed. I think it lacked some immediate context to understand and it cements Kino's morality as somewhat weird and extreme, missing emphasis on why Kino would take her revenge to such a large scale. Maybe fleshing out the reality of this country and its citizens more would have helped, but instead this was more about her revenge story. And I have to say, this motivation was not particularly well told. So many people are saying that it's worse than the Colosseum arc of the old Kino and I'm really mixed. Never got the huge appeal for this arc. I mean, it was entertaining and tense, yeah, but it was essentially two episodes of fights. This is not the kind of series for that. It felt like a missed opportunity to explore more environments by dragging out a story with filler action. If there's one thing I loved about this remake is how the action sequences are made how I think they should be: lifeless and irrelevant. Can't agree with you guys who talk about skipping the fights as a legit flaw. Whether it's better or worse than the original anime version, probably worse in general terms, doesn't matter much to me because this episode keeps delivering like the previous did, and particularly on how Kino views and acts towards the world. It's quite an intriguing personality; I'm not too much of a fan of the exaggerated contrasts the anime has brought with the side characters that talk with her but it surely works to describe her quietness and cold attitude. I guess part of the reason why this works less for many people here than the old version is because of the lack of verbal or narrative exposition that gives us a more proper measure of her mental/emotional state. Still, her little displays of distress through these conversations should have been more than enough to give an idea. |
jal90Oct 13, 2017 4:15 PM
Oct 13, 2017 4:12 PM
#67
nina444 said: Like what the others said, the main purpose of this episode is for the introduction of the new character. You can watch the original if you wantHow disappointing... really disappointing... this episode 2, only left bitter taste in my mouth its really lack character development, and the pacing is horrible.. its like 3 episode converted into 1 episode. |
Oct 13, 2017 4:19 PM
#68
Wow, this was... bad. I'm so glad I watched the original before starting this show now. I was wondering why the character designs bothered me in this version and after seeing this redone edition of the king, I figured it out - they're boring! Everyone looks so boring! Kino especially looks dull as all hell. This was my hands down favourite part of the original and it was 100% because of how extra the king was. His look, his voice, his love of a puppet show that was just his own life story... It was crazy! It was fun! I had high hopes for this show after a guy got mobbed and stabbed in the very first ep but now I'm like :/ GoingInside said: gintamaben said: It pretty much exactly how it go in novel though, 2003 version added many original things included those puppet part, not to mentioned that the characters motivation are completely different in novel. So what? I don't care about the author's original intent, I care about the quality of the show. This show is notably worse than the 2003 version so far. I agree wholeheartedly with this. A real problem I've always had with anime fans is this attitude that adaptations should be just animating the source material word for word. No! Stop that! That's literally the opposite of what an adaptation is supposed to be - it's supposed to manipulate the story to suit a different type of media. Whilst this dialogue-heavy mess might have worked on paper, in a visual piece of work such as an anime, it needs to be changed. A failure to do that is just a bad adaptation, plain and simple, especially when it does something as unimaginative, boring and devoid of creativity as just copy/pasting everything from the novel. No matter how faithful it was, if it wasn't fun and engaging to watch (especially compared to a much lower budget and older rendition!) then it just wasn't good. |
Oct 13, 2017 4:20 PM
#69
Oct 13, 2017 4:39 PM
#70
Oct 13, 2017 4:43 PM
#71
Chaotic_beauty said: Regicide and genocide are not okay. This show is pure filth. Are you being ironic? |
Oct 13, 2017 5:09 PM
#72
Oct 13, 2017 5:30 PM
#73
As a someone who has seen the 2003 anime and read this chapter of the LN, this episode was far more faithful to the LN. That said, I don't think this episode was particularly worse than the 2003 2-episode adaptation. For the reasons why, view the spoilers for the 2003 version below: In the 2003 adaptation, we were given much more characterization of combatants, the king, Shizu, and the second-class citizens/slaves. Kino asking each competitor's reasons for fighting and seeing their interactions with each other help viewers see the fights as important/feel more empathy for them as individuals as opposed to the 2017 version having Kino KO nobodies at record breaking speeds. Seeing the puppet play in the 2003 version gives us insight into how such a vile country came to be, the affects of abuse on the psyche, foreshadowing for Shizu's motivation, etc. Kino's venture into the second-class citizen homes makes the viewer understand Kino's ruling at the end from a moral standpoint. All these things were handled fairly well in the 2003 version and added layers to the Colosseum story that were not there in the original LN version. It played on the viewer's pathos and had Kino act as the viewer's moral compass with her decision at the end. But here's where it gets tricky and why I don't think this adaptation was necessarily terrible. The whole point of the story revolved around vengeance. At this point in the LN, the reader had already read about Kino's origin story in The Land of Adults. The reader would already have known that Kino is no stranger to losing people she cares about to the laws of countries, some of which she may not always agree with. As hinted by Woodsman (her smaller caliber Persuader she holsters behind her back), she has ventured to this hedonistic land after she had visited A Peaceful Land (she didn't have it yet) and A Kind Land (acquired Woodsman here) so she is no stranger to mass genocide and soul-crushing death. She has seen first-hand the cruelty humans are capable of and has experienced the pain of loss. While it is her decision to continue traveling no matter how dangerous and how sad the world is, and she is often seen as being cold and detached from the countries she visits, that does not mean she is immune from feeling emotions. She felt genuine fear when attacked outside of the Peaceful Land and almost died in A Tale of Feeding Off Others. She felt genuine disgust after seeing the genocide in the Peaceful Land. She felt genuine admiration after hearing the stories of the Land of Heroes. And she felt genuine despair after leaving the Kind Land. This episode showed, albeit subtlety, Kino's frustrations with the cruelty of the world and her frustrations with herself for not being able to see that cruelty as beautiful. In the LN and in this episode, it didn't matter to Kino what the other people's reason for fighting was. Her goal was to take vengeance for a woman who was powerless to do so, just as she was in her birth country. And what Kino did to achieve that goal, ultimately, disgusted her. This was seen when she was clearly venting out her disdain for herself by throwing the rocks in the pond. Even after everything she's been through up to this point, she isn't the perfect traveler she wants to be. She gets caught up in her emotions that she wishes she could keep under control and her view that the world is beautiful because of its flaws is constantly challenged. In this instance, she couldn't look the other way and that upset her. This is also why I disagree with people saying that the monologue last episode is pointless due to the backstory episodes we will get soon. The monologue tells you that Kino isn't as cold or strong as she fronts and sometimes the journey gets to her. I guess you could say that the order of the episodes of this new adaptation makes this episode seem rushed and weak. It might also be off-putting because new viewers haven't known Kino for as long as older fans, making her actions seem really messed up (which they kinda were). The Colosseum chapter was one of the weaker chapters in the LN, and one of the weaker couple of episodes in the 2003 anime as well so there's that to take into account. In addition to this, lack of Shizu backstory isn't that much of a fault because we will get Shizu episodes later on, something the 2003 anime did not have. Anyways, I'm sure there's more I can say but I'll just leave it at that. The LN vs 2003 anime versions of Colosseum weren't better or worse than each other. They were just different. |
sroqueOct 13, 2017 9:00 PM
Oct 13, 2017 5:46 PM
#74
Well, that's a very J-Poppy opening. Pretty, mind you, but I'm fine with it. Anyways, I liked the opening few seconds where it seemed like a story book scene. That's really what I want the most, and while it wasn't much, I'll take what I can get. I noticed a lot of people talking about the use of CG in the past episode, and while I also have my own reservations about its use, I don't mind as long they mesh well enough. As it is, there's certainly a bit of conflicting aesthetics, so that'll definitely need to get worked on. For the episode itself, it really needed to have more darker locations. It's really brightly lit. Also, it feels like Kino's voice got a slight bit deeper in this particular episode. Kino definitely comes across as observant and curious, but I always felt like this particular story had Kino become too involved with the country. With this episode, Kino comes across as a bit too eager to fight. It's a minor bit, but I really wish at the beginning, we could have seen Kino's face under that hat instead of Kino's eyes being darkened. As in, have them seemed dulled out and contemplative, rather than having it seem like Kino was really taking the collusium issue personally from the start. During Kino's fight with Shizu, Kino's plan was spelt out explicitly with little subtlety. Also, the actual killing seemed almost out of nowhere. I understand the reasoning behind it, but by having the episode rushed as it did, it made Kino's motivation to completely ruin the country be Kino's meeting with that woman from the beginning and the story Kino heard from Hermes. It just seems so unlike Kino, whom I'd imagine only killing out of self-defense, rather than for the sake of another. Though, you can justify this by saying that Kino is, in fact, human, and is capable of acting irrationally, but it just seems very uncharacteristic, at least as Kino was portrayed. That, and holy crap the fights were rushed. That, and the OST is far too bombastic for its own good. The show really needs to calm itself down. With Shizu, he seems a little too happy to be fighting, at least from when he first walked into the colluseum. There was actually very little to his introduction, and he just suddenly appeared. The episode had a lot of information discussed in past tense, making for an awkward balance of action and dialogue. To address this, I would have suggested to leave more to visuals than spoken words. This really was rushed. I suppose my issue here was that I watched the first adpatation too many times, so much so that I've become too familiar with its atmosphere and style. This problem is accentuated by the repeated story, where I felt the first iteration was handled much better. That being said, I was never particularly fond of this story to begin with, as I've always felt that Kino got far too involved with the country, going so far as to flip the country's sociopolitical system upside down. This is more of an issue with the story itself, rather than the adaptation. Though, this current adaptation makes the issue feel arguably worse than the original by having Kino's motive to kill the king be her meeting with the woman from beginning, as well as what she heard from Hermes. Nothing from this ever feels really personal, as Kino has no reason or obligation to get involved with the country. Though, to be fair, this is closer to how the light novel handled the story compared to the 2003 anime, which is what the 2017 anime may have attempted to take more from. I don't want to speak too much about the 2003 version, as that's its own interpretation, but at the very least, both the light novel and the 2017 never made this story feel like a Kino's Journey story. It's unfortunate since this is also the introductory episode to Shizu, so it's unavoidable in that regard. I...I still wish the 2017 version could have done something to improve on the light novel's story. Or I dunno, may I'm just that spoiled by the 2003 anime. jal90 said: And here goes another 4/5. I don't think the episode was rushed. I think it lacked some immediate context to understand and it cements Kino's morality as somewhat weird and extreme, missing emphasis on why Kino would take her revenge to such a large scale. Maybe fleshing out the reality of this country and its citizens more would have helped, but instead this was more about her revenge story. And I have to say, this motivation was not particularly well told. So many people are saying that it's worse than the Colosseum arc of the old Kino and I'm really mixed. Never got the huge appeal for this arc. I mean, it was entertaining and tense, yeah, but it was essentially two episodes of fights. This is not the kind of series for that. It felt like a missed opportunity to explore more environments by dragging out a story with filler action. If there's one thing I loved about this remake is how the action sequences are made how I think they should be: lifeless and irrelevant. Can't agree with you guys who talk about skipping the fights as a legit flaw. Whether it's better or worse than the original anime version, probably worse in general terms, doesn't matter much to me because this episode keeps delivering like the previous did, and particularly on how Kino views and acts towards the world. It's quite an intriguing personality; I'm not too much of a fan of the exaggerated contrasts the anime has brought with the side characters that talk with her but it surely works to describe her quietness and cold attitude. I guess part of the reason why this works less for many people here than the old version is because of the lack of verbal or narrative exposition that gives us a more proper measure of her mental/emotional state. Still, her little displays of distress through these conversations should have been more than enough to give an idea. Understandably, with the two iterations being made more than a decade apart, they're bound to be different. Though, as a thought, for the people who enjoyed the original more, they can go back and watch the original. I definitely felt that the 2003 version handled this story better, but having this newer adaptation repeat the story 1:1 would feel like a waste of an opportunity to do something different. I do like that the 2017 version didn't try to copy the first anime, but I wonder if it was necessary to stay more true to the light novel, rather than taking an alternate route and perform its own interpretation. |
ShockedOct 13, 2017 5:56 PM
Oct 13, 2017 5:51 PM
#75
IDK why, but something about the art style kind of didn't impress me this episode, even though it didn't bother me the last time, maybe it was the babes around the king that just made me realize how more generic and stuff the art style is now, idk just changes the mood of the show for me. Been awhile since I saw the old anime, still, seeing the old anime doesn't really make me hate this. Maybe I compartmentalize better, but I really enjoyed this episode. Think this episode could of done better with the wife though, it made it seem almost a mystery why she sent Kino there, but I'm sure its meant to be that she knew Kino could do something but idk if the show built up the idea that Kino should be that badass for it to me obvious she'd be able to survive. |
Jaywalker. |
Oct 13, 2017 6:23 PM
#76
so good. good op and ed. masterpiece |
Oct 13, 2017 7:08 PM
#77
i never really liked this arc in the older version, but in comparison to this version, the 2003 one is better. |
N.etorare T.echnical R.esearcher |
Oct 13, 2017 7:22 PM
#78
The social commentary that I loved about the original anime isn't as prevalent in this reboot. This episode felt a bit hollow, and contrived. What was the point in making the town's people fight each other? Kino's actions had clearer justification in the 2003 version. 3/5 |
aikaflipNov 3, 2017 9:55 AM
Oct 13, 2017 7:48 PM
#79
Well, reading the posters' complaint has influenced me. I was just gonna leave a comment about the woman the protagonist apparently has met (wasn't shown before, was it?), saying that she must've been discontent in her relationship, thus felt relief in the death of her partner--and that by telling the protagonist to go to that place, knowing how it is, must've meant that she became a bitter person then (to put it lightly). But well, now I'll just share my negative view of the show, that is about...its plot convenience. (Trying to to put it short): Kino's gun skills are there for this, and to make her impressive (falsely). Competitors appear to come from Shonen shows, but as this isn't supposed to be one, they don't succeed like in them, but instead make a fool outta themselves (thinking about the big ball-chain wielding man). Yet when the plot demands it, a samurai guy (like usual) is given super-human abilities--but that are quickly taken away from him due to Kino's plot armor. The justification given is the pressure of his objective hindering him, but that's too weak, and actually an excuse. He had been deflecting bullets and even if Kino had used one that'd pierce his sword, he like any good fighter would be avoiding the aim of the gun being in any vital part of him. But instead we've him make such a ridiculously showy full-open vertical swing at her. WTH? That's so ugly. He could've just stabbed her swiftly and that'd be it. Just imagine how it'd look for Gilgamesh to do the same against Illyasviel. But the circumstances are different--there the producers were fine with Illya being treated like an insect, while Kino is this show's beloved (female) protagonist. If I were honest (and not as reasonable), I'd be giving half the score I'm giving it now--but this'd apply to even shows like Berserk, so well, I don't believe I should. We just shouldn't measure fiction with reality's measure meter. |
removed-userOct 13, 2017 7:57 PM
Oct 13, 2017 7:59 PM
#80
I thought that they rushed the arc compared to the original, but looks like it was the other way: the old version anime original content. I prefer the old version, but this episode was enjoyable nonetheless. |
Oct 13, 2017 8:32 PM
#81
radle said: Why am I reading comments on what Kino did was a bad thing? Did some of you above pay any attention to the episode at all? The King ruled the way he wanted to being a selfish prick after murdering his father and also getting rid of anybody else who opposed him then his own wife could not handle his reign and killed herself and outcasted his own children but the worst part was the people in the city who at first objected to it at first but went along with it eventually even allowing trash that greeted Kino at the gate to the city to make that arena on the basis of fighting/killing other for sport/citizenship. It was all set when Kino found out the rules, backstory and the condition of stray bullets as he get rid of the King then as victor proceeded to do what he said to the crowd in order to be the next ruler. Everybody there got what they had before (just without a King now) which was chaos but only on a much larger scale and a big prize to participate in just as they enjoyed watching others kill people for sports now they get to do it to one another. Kino got the worst of it if no one can believe that by his reaction at the lake. What a great episode. As someone who hasn't watched the 2003 version, this was what I also got out from the episode. Unless that's not what we were supposed to conclude, this was obviously the reason why Kino wasn't just being an asshole. From what I've read about comparisons of this episode to the 2003 version, seems like they just fleshed out the events more, but the fleshing out was not necessary (not saying it's bad) imo for the same conclusion to be reached with the information that was shown in this episode alone. Sure it may take a few more moments to think about, but again, all the information needed was presented. I did wonder for a moment why Kino would want such a cruel thing to happen to the country, for the citizens to fight, but I remembered that Hermes said the contestants were fighting for citizenship, yet isn't it cruel for the spectators, who're citizens, to be watching and enjoying these fights? Is it really so cruel to "make" the citizens fight? And like Hermes told the guard, "If you don't want to die, you should leave the country." Kino's rule doesn't stop anyone from leaving the country either. Most people who're fighting at the end probably wants to be the King for selfish purposes. That being said, I have watched the first episode of the 2003 anime, and I have to say, I do like the atmosphere there better than in this series. It felt more mundane? More calm? More like a slice of life adventure. I was really surprised when Riku spoke lol. My mom was next to me and asked me why I was surprised a dog talked in anime, but I told her it's because there are anime that wouldn't surprise me if a dog talked, but this one wasn't one of them. Anyways, I don't think we'll see Shizu soon, but I'm interested in seeing him again, who the story seemed to have set up mystery around him. |
Oct 13, 2017 8:35 PM
#82
ButadonMeitante said: but... I'm starting to think this series is not about the 'beautiful world' whatsoever... I think Hermes said it best: "I don't know if this world is beautiful, but it's certainly vast." |
✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ “The right to think is the beginning of freedom, and speech must be protected from the government because speech is the beginning of thought.” — Ashcroft v.Free Speech Coalition, ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ ✣ |
Oct 13, 2017 8:37 PM
#83
As a newcomer to Kino's Journey and watching this series first, I actually enjoyed the episode a lot! Though I do agree the fights themselves felt rushed, I was really engaged and am currently loving the show so far. And I keep finding myself anticipating for the next episode xD Lerche's animation for the show is really pretty and the visuals are quite beautiful, in my opinion. And I appreciate how the episodes end it to where it leaves the viewer up to interpretation, and I love the deeper meanings the show has too. I do acknowledge that many people who watched the 2003 ver. love that a lot more, which I can understand bc i've felt the same way about another show too. I've also gotten around to watching a few episodes from it as well. However, I still like the new Kino's Journey and find myself appreciating it as its own piece of work nonetheless. It is a shame though seeing the hate this adaptation is having ;; But as a person who just started getting into the series bc of this 2017 remake, I can't wait to see more :) |
Oct 13, 2017 8:53 PM
#84
I found it interesting how they changed the interaction between Hermes and Riku, In the 2003 version he had a few conversations with him between the 2 parts, where as in this version he was surprised he could talk at the end of this ep. As an anime only watcher im not sure which was in the novels, I found it odd. But I did also find it weird that they remade this ep only to speed through everything though ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |
Oct 13, 2017 9:04 PM
#85
This was the worst episode of Kino's Journey, I have ever seen. -Kino completely breaks character -The Colosseum story is a complete rehash from the one in season 1 -There is absolutely nothing bizarre about this episode, even though this is Kino's Journey |
Oct 13, 2017 9:14 PM
#86
ThatCynicalOtaku said: This was the worst episode of Kino's Journey, I have ever seen. -Kino completely breaks character -The Colosseum story is a complete rehash from the one in season 1 -There is absolutely nothing bizarre about this episode, even though this is Kino's Journey Lol no she doesn't. And considering both anime adapted the same ln arc, why did you expect it to be any different than the original? Even then the original was more fleshed out. |
Oct 13, 2017 9:18 PM
#87
ambrose7 said: ThatCynicalOtaku said: This was the worst episode of Kino's Journey, I have ever seen. -Kino completely breaks character -The Colosseum story is a complete rehash from the one in season 1 -There is absolutely nothing bizarre about this episode, even though this is Kino's Journey Lol no she doesn't. And considering both anime adapted the same ln arc, why did you expect it to be any different than the original? Even then the original was more fleshed out. Kino never threatened anyone out of anger. She'd never tell people to kill each other. Most of all, she would never even care, about someone enough to be angry for them. So wait, why is this episode another adaptation of the same arc then? If season 1 already did it. I mean episode 1 was completely new. |
Oct 13, 2017 9:25 PM
#88
ThatCynicalOtaku said: ambrose7 said: ThatCynicalOtaku said: This was the worst episode of Kino's Journey, I have ever seen. -Kino completely breaks character -The Colosseum story is a complete rehash from the one in season 1 -There is absolutely nothing bizarre about this episode, even though this is Kino's Journey Lol no she doesn't. And considering both anime adapted the same ln arc, why did you expect it to be any different than the original? Even then the original was more fleshed out. Kino never threatened anyone out of anger. She'd never tell people to kill each other. Most of all, she would never even care, about someone enough to be angry for them. So wait, why is this episode another adaptation of the same arc then? If season 1 already did it. I mean episode 1 was completely new. The ending of this episode was the same as the light novel. It isn't out of character if it happened in the first volume of the source material. And the reason they adapted this story again is because Shizu appears in later stories so they had to introduce him to new viewers. |
Oct 13, 2017 9:28 PM
#89
joa12222 said: ThatCynicalOtaku said: ambrose7 said: ThatCynicalOtaku said: This was the worst episode of Kino's Journey, I have ever seen. -Kino completely breaks character -The Colosseum story is a complete rehash from the one in season 1 -There is absolutely nothing bizarre about this episode, even though this is Kino's Journey Lol no she doesn't. And considering both anime adapted the same ln arc, why did you expect it to be any different than the original? Even then the original was more fleshed out. Kino never threatened anyone out of anger. She'd never tell people to kill each other. Most of all, she would never even care, about someone enough to be angry for them. So wait, why is this episode another adaptation of the same arc then? If season 1 already did it. I mean episode 1 was completely new. The ending of this episode was the same as the light novel. It isn't out of character if it happened in the first volume of the source material. And the reason they adapted this story again is because Shizu appears in later stories so they had to introduce him to new viewers. Wait, so that means there'll be no more rehashed stories?! YES!! |
Oct 13, 2017 9:39 PM
#90
as a new comer to the series, Kino pisses me off this episode. First she's using firearms and for being hypocritical for calling out prince's revenge as stupid. the good part that I found my shipping a ship which sails me to nhentai |
Oct 13, 2017 9:44 PM
#91
sroque said: As a someone who has seen the 2003 anime and read this chapter of the LN, this episode was far more faithful to the LN. That said, I don't think this episode was particularly worse than the 2003 2-episode adaptation. For the reasons why, view the spoilers for the 2003 version below: In the 2003 adaptation, we were given much more characterization of combatants, the king, Shizu, and the second-class citizens/slaves. Kino asking each competitor's reasons for fighting and seeing their interactions with each other help viewers see the fights as important/feel more empathy for them as individuals as opposed to the 2017 version having Kino KO nobodies at record breaking speeds. Seeing the puppet play in the 2003 version gives us insight into how such a vile country came to be, the affects of abuse on the psyche, foreshadowing for Shizu's motivation, etc. Kino's venture into the second-class citizen homes makes the viewer understand Kino's ruling at the end from a moral standpoint. All these things were handled fairly well in the 2003 version and added layers to the Colosseum story that were not there in the original LN version. It played on the viewer's pathos and had Kino act as the viewer's moral compass with her decision at the end. But here's where it gets tricky and why I don't think this adaptation was necessarily terrible. The whole point of the story revolved around vengeance. At this point in the LN, the reader had already read about Kino's origin story in The Land of Adults. The reader would already have known that Kino is no stranger to losing people she cares about to the laws of countries, some of which she may not always agree with. As hinted by Woodsman (her smaller caliber Persuader she holsters behind her back), she has ventured to this hedonistic land after she had visited A Peaceful Land (she didn't have it yet) and A Kind Land (acquired Woodsman here) so she is no stranger to mass genocide and soul-crushing death. She has seen first-hand the cruelty humans are capable of and has experienced the pain of loss. While it is her decision to continue traveling no matter how dangerous and how sad the world is, and she is often seen as being cold and detached from the countries she visits, that does not mean she is immune from feeling emotions. She felt genuine fear when attacked outside of the Peaceful Land and almost died in A Tale of Feeding Off Others. She felt genuine disgust after seeing the genocide in the Peaceful Land. She felt genuine admiration after hearing the stories of the Land of Heroes. And she felt genuine despair after leaving the Kind Land. This episode showed, albeit subtlety, Kino's frustrations with the cruelty of the world and her frustrations with herself for not being able to see that cruelty as beautiful. In the LN and in this episode, it didn't matter to Kino what the other people's reason for fighting was. Her goal was to take vengeance for a woman who was powerless to do so, just as she was in her birth country. And what Kino did to achieve that goal, ultimately, disgusted her. This was seen when she was clearly venting out her disdain for herself by throwing the rocks in the pond. Even after everything she's been through up to this point, she isn't the perfect traveler she wants to be. She gets caught up in her emotions that she wishes she could keep under control and her view that the world is beautiful because of its flaws is constantly challenged. In this instance, she couldn't look the other way and that upset her. This is also why I disagree with people saying that the monologue last episode is pointless due to the backstory episodes we will get soon. The monologue tells you that Kino isn't as cold or strong as she fronts and sometimes the journey gets to her. I guess you could say that the order of the episodes of this new adaptation makes this episode seem rushed and weak. It might also be off-putting because new viewers haven't known Kino for as long as older fans, making her actions seem really messed up (which they kinda were). The Colosseum chapter was one of the weaker chapters in the LN, and one of the weaker couple of episodes in the 2003 anime as well so there's that to take into account. In addition to this, lack of Shizu backstory isn't that much of a fault because we will get Shizu episodes later on, something the 2003 anime did not have. Anyways, I'm sure there's more I can say but I'll just leave it at that. The LN vs 2003 anime versions of Colosseum weren't better or worse than each other. They were just different. This. Bravo! Couldn't have been worded better. For those wary of the spoiler tag, the summary is this: the LN version and this version focused on the theme of Revenge, the 2003 anime softened that theme and emphasized something broader: Motivation. They are different interpretations of a story with the same general plot. That's why many new viewers are still getting the point and enjoying this episode. |
Oct 13, 2017 9:46 PM
#92
hithummah said: being hypocritical for calling out prince's revenge as stupid. Precisely, in doing so, she admits that what she did was also stupid. :D |
Oct 13, 2017 10:08 PM
#93
I like this reboot so far, but I can't say that the OP or ED compare to those of the original. Same goes, broadly speaking, for the rest of the soundtrack. It's not a dealbreaker at all, but just a comment. I hope that this gets people excited about a very very cool set of light novels, as well as getting more attention for the original series. |
Oct 13, 2017 10:34 PM
#94
Upon reflection, this version of "Colosseum" was not nearly as intense and compelling as the original series. I definitely feel like this reboot may be amping up the pace to appeal to current audience expectations, but it doesn't work for me. I hope that this will change. Many people have noted Mushishi as a similar anime, but that show has more in common, so far, with the original Kino no Tabi anime. |
Oct 13, 2017 10:37 PM
#95
Shocked said: This is the best post I've seen in this entire threadWell, that's a very J-Poppy opening. Pretty, mind you, but I'm fine with it. Anyways, I liked the opening few seconds where it seemed like a story book scene. That's really what I want the most, and while it wasn't much, I'll take what I can get. I noticed a lot of people talking about the use of CG in the past episode, and while I also have my own reservations about its use, I don't mind as long they mesh well enough. As it is, there's certainly a bit of conflicting aesthetics, so that'll definitely need to get worked on. For the episode itself, it really needed to have more darker locations. It's really brightly lit. Also, it feels like Kino's voice got a slight bit deeper in this particular episode. Kino definitely comes across as observant and curious, but I always felt like this particular story had Kino become too involved with the country. With this episode, Kino comes across as a bit too eager to fight. It's a minor bit, but I really wish at the beginning, we could have seen Kino's face under that hat instead of Kino's eyes being darkened. As in, have them seemed dulled out and contemplative, rather than having it seem like Kino was really taking the collusium issue personally from the start. During Kino's fight with Shizu, Kino's plan was spelt out explicitly with little subtlety. Also, the actual killing seemed almost out of nowhere. I understand the reasoning behind it, but by having the episode rushed as it did, it made Kino's motivation to completely ruin the country be Kino's meeting with that woman from the beginning and the story Kino heard from Hermes. It just seems so unlike Kino, whom I'd imagine only killing out of self-defense, rather than for the sake of another. Though, you can justify this by saying that Kino is, in fact, human, and is capable of acting irrationally, but it just seems very uncharacteristic, at least as Kino was portrayed. That, and holy crap the fights were rushed. That, and the OST is far too bombastic for its own good. The show really needs to calm itself down. With Shizu, he seems a little too happy to be fighting, at least from when he first walked into the colluseum. There was actually very little to his introduction, and he just suddenly appeared. The episode had a lot of information discussed in past tense, making for an awkward balance of action and dialogue. To address this, I would have suggested to leave more to visuals than spoken words. This really was rushed. I suppose my issue here was that I watched the first adpatation too many times, so much so that I've become too familiar with its atmosphere and style. This problem is accentuated by the repeated story, where I felt the first iteration was handled much better. That being said, I was never particularly fond of this story to begin with, as I've always felt that Kino got far too involved with the country, going so far as to flip the country's sociopolitical system upside down. This is more of an issue with the story itself, rather than the adaptation. Though, this current adaptation makes the issue feel arguably worse than the original by having Kino's motive to kill the king be her meeting with the woman from beginning, as well as what she heard from Hermes. Nothing from this ever feels really personal, as Kino has no reason or obligation to get involved with the country. Though, to be fair, this is closer to how the light novel handled the story compared to the 2003 anime, which is what the 2017 anime may have attempted to take more from. I don't want to speak too much about the 2003 version, as that's its own interpretation, but at the very least, both the light novel and the 2017 never made this story feel like a Kino's Journey story. It's unfortunate since this is also the introductory episode to Shizu, so it's unavoidable in that regard. I...I still wish the 2017 version could have done something to improve on the light novel's story. Or I dunno, may I'm just that spoiled by the 2003 anime. jal90 said: And here goes another 4/5. I don't think the episode was rushed. I think it lacked some immediate context to understand and it cements Kino's morality as somewhat weird and extreme, missing emphasis on why Kino would take her revenge to such a large scale. Maybe fleshing out the reality of this country and its citizens more would have helped, but instead this was more about her revenge story. And I have to say, this motivation was not particularly well told. So many people are saying that it's worse than the Colosseum arc of the old Kino and I'm really mixed. Never got the huge appeal for this arc. I mean, it was entertaining and tense, yeah, but it was essentially two episodes of fights. This is not the kind of series for that. It felt like a missed opportunity to explore more environments by dragging out a story with filler action. If there's one thing I loved about this remake is how the action sequences are made how I think they should be: lifeless and irrelevant. Can't agree with you guys who talk about skipping the fights as a legit flaw. Whether it's better or worse than the original anime version, probably worse in general terms, doesn't matter much to me because this episode keeps delivering like the previous did, and particularly on how Kino views and acts towards the world. It's quite an intriguing personality; I'm not too much of a fan of the exaggerated contrasts the anime has brought with the side characters that talk with her but it surely works to describe her quietness and cold attitude. I guess part of the reason why this works less for many people here than the old version is because of the lack of verbal or narrative exposition that gives us a more proper measure of her mental/emotional state. Still, her little displays of distress through these conversations should have been more than enough to give an idea. Understandably, with the two iterations being made more than a decade apart, they're bound to be different. Though, as a thought, for the people who enjoyed the original more, they can go back and watch the original. I definitely felt that the 2003 version handled this story better, but having this newer adaptation repeat the story 1:1 would feel like a waste of an opportunity to do something different. I do like that the 2017 version didn't try to copy the first anime, but I wonder if it was necessary to stay more true to the light novel, rather than taking an alternate route and perform its own interpretation. You hit the nail on the head with just about everything and although I think that it's nice that this was closer to the LN, I agree with you in regards to wishing that this new anime chose to do something different like the 2003 one did (Or even just remaster the 2003 version) |
Oct 13, 2017 10:43 PM
#96
hithummah said: as a new comer to the series, Kino pisses me off this episode. First she's using firearms and for being hypocritical for calling out prince's revenge as stupid. the good part that I found my shipping a ship which sails me to nhentai At the risk of being seen as ignorant, what's that pic from? I obv saw the title on the img but Google did not help. Thanks! |
Oct 13, 2017 11:18 PM
#97
Nagi Yanagi is very busy this Fall Season, OP & ED are both performed by her and another series this season (just because!) anywayz, that was a nice sharpshooter of Kino to assassinate the current king of that country! 4/5. |
Oct 13, 2017 11:18 PM
#98
while Kino didn't break any rules still feels messed up to do with the theme of the episode revenge really is foolish as a anime only watcher i wish so much wasn't spelled out for me not much room for me to think about when it's gonna be explained fully by the end |
Oct 13, 2017 11:18 PM
#99
Kino original was many many years ago and barely remember anything from that I dont understand the part where Kino met the wife of the carriage on the start the wife was sparred she yield to her husband but husband died on the next round then what happened to her and able to get out from that country ? in which the wife kinda plans Kino to intervene to that country but Kino is an observer for every country travels to |
Oct 13, 2017 11:39 PM
#100
This was really shitty and boring. Nothing had any context and i had no reason to care about what was going on. The country had no focus, just a really flat exposition. This is what happens when you remake Kinos Journey for double digit IQs The difference in quality is clear if you watch the original adaptation right after. It's more dramatic, more compelling, and everything has context. It's just written and presented better in every way. It's not even an argument. |
NyronOct 13, 2017 11:49 PM
More topics from this board
Poll: » Kino no Tabi: The Beautiful World - The Animated Series Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Dec 22, 2017 |
148 |
by the_v1gor
»»
Jun 25, 8:50 AM |
|
Poll: » Kino no Tabi: The Beautiful World - The Animated Series Episode 3 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Oct 20, 2017 |
130 |
by croberto
»»
Jun 7, 9:18 PM |
|
Poll: » Kino no Tabi: The Beautiful World - The Animated Series Episode 8 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Nov 24, 2017 |
76 |
by Dawizz
»»
May 27, 4:01 AM |
|
Poll: » Kino no Tabi: The Beautiful World - The Animated Series Episode 6 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Nov 10, 2017 |
104 |
by Dawizz
»»
May 27, 4:00 AM |
|
» I thought Kino was a guy.Nyamaste - May 2, 2022 |
13 |
by Dawizz
»»
May 27, 3:57 AM |