New
What did you think of this episode?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this episode. If you want to discuss future events or theories, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Jul 7, 2020 2:45 AM
#301
| Its a focken T O U R N A M E N T A R C A cliche for sure, but a welcome one, since its one of my favorite shounnen tropes. ^ this guy, dont be this guy. |
Jul 7, 2020 3:22 AM
#302
nightcrawlercyp said: Again you ego is through the roof, you art is not better than the anime, thats obvius, you know it, everyone in the world with knows it. My point wasnt that cgi correlating to animation, it was that KNOWING A FFUCKING OLD COMPUTER HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FUCKING CONVERSATION AND KNOWING HOW TO ANIMATE, besides, if you try to replicate 2d animation with CGI, do you know what happens? It looks bad, really fucking bad, low fps is probably the biggest problem with cgi animation this days, with orange and cyclone graphics the only ones that actually try to make it their own type of style. Ok i agree with number 3, but the thing is, THIS ANIMATION DOES LOOK NATURAL, it makes its objetive which is create hype and excitement, its fast, fluid in some parts and more choppy in others, is that bad? NO. The more choppy animation was done by the director seong ho park, and thats just his animation style. I know your biggest gripe on the show is the noses, which again i dont really like it too, but again thats a character design problem, not animation, those are too diferent things. 4, ok thats fine, i follow people because i apreciate their work, i like to say congrats on twitter when an animator does a good job on an episode, i like to comeback to see their animation and the more you look into it the more you want to see more of it and the more you apreciate their work because you understand that it is hard, you understand that not everyone is capable of what they are doing, but if you dont want to follow people, thats fine, thats on you, but criticizing the work of people that are CLEARLY having passion and dedication with their amazing animation, i just cant let that slide. No im not a girl, when i was talking about emotion, its the objetive of the animation, like i said before here it was to create hype and excitement, THOSE ARE EMOTIONS.VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: uhmmm no i dont have 2 accounts. Saying cooking is the most basic skill of all is tecnicly correct and wrong at the same time, if it was so easy why do you think there is so many "pretentious garbage" when people can just follow the recipe, like you said, its never that simple. The computer is, again, not a good argument, first you knowing a computer isnt a good correlation to you knowing something about drawing, yes most animation is done in computers (although in japan is still mostly paper), does that mean that knowing an old computer make you know about animation? No, i could also ask my grampa about that and maybe he would know that computer, does he know how to draw? No. I also said i didnt know how to draw, i not that i didnt understand the basic principals of animation, and the process of japanese animation to be precise, because i do know, i search for that, like how you draw, i search for animation as a hobby. i dont see any bad of doing it, i saw your drawings, are they that impressive? No. Will i judge you for it? No, because honestly im much worse. Does that mean i know less than you about animation, obviusly not. If you want to learn more about animation, go to sakugabooru and hit the random button until you actually understand what animation is. To see the process of animation i recomend the strive for animation channel. There are also alot of people on twitter that show and talk about japanese animation, like randomsakuga, kvin, purplegeth, ashita, and alot othersVP2003boi said: Is a very old computer, knew only qbasic 4 . Yes it means that maybe you do not understand certain principles of realistic drawing. No, but you do need to know some basic stuff to differentiate between good food and pretentious garbage which many city folks do not know... and cooking is the most basic skill of all... I mean you just follow the recipe for most part. If you have no idea about the process of drawing and animation how can you judge what is going on? you make little to no sense. Also do you have two accounts? nightcrawlercyp said: Honestly i i dont know what an HC computer is, i googled it and alot of stuff apeared, but the biggest one seemed that it just means home computer? Meh, i dont care, that argument is fucking trash, calling me a kid inst a very good one too, im pretty much a kid tho, im pretty young, but honestly i dont mind. Oh and i dont know how to draw, thats that mean anything? obviusly not, do you need to know how to cook like gordan ramsay to apreciate his food? Probably not right? And another example is yuichiro fukushi, he is my favourite animation producer, he doesnt know how to draw, but he knows which people KNOW how to draw, so yea that argument is also not that great. The shading on the faces, i can kinda see i guess, its industry average pretty much, not amazing yea.Dust_Eyezz said: Then maybe you should rewatch it... not very generic from my pov. about CGI... is clear you grew up with movies that abuse CGI and that look like garbage so you have no idea how real stuff should look like. nightcrawlercyp said: Arifureta and good story? What did u smoke? Arifureta is the most generic garbage ever? It's like any other Isekai betray kinda stuff? Have you even watched the same arifureta as me? African meme movies have better CGI...ElGoblino said: nightcrawlercyp said: VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? And here ladies and gentlemen we have someone that doesn't know shit about art and animation but he likes to talk and give his opinion and thinks both are same thing. The guy asks him how does this show have bad animation when in fact it's actually great and he responds with why everyone has red noses which has nothing to do animation. Facepalm well animation has been a passion of mine for over 20 years , studied it, created some 2d, 3d, game animation, done my share of art both in pencil and digital (see deviantart page with same name) but is clear I have no idea what I am talking about. True good animation accounts for the mechanics of biological bodies that have bones and muscles and respond to physical laws but hey that does not matter, right? MegamiRem said: Good animation takes into account the laws of physics and makes movements look natural. Also about the visuals they are supposed to represent real human being but there are a ton of parts not well drawn at all.nightcrawlercyp said: Bad visual? Bad animation? Lmao wut? Care to elaborate what good animation and visuals are then lmao?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Dust_Eyezz said: nightcrawlercyp said: you gave arifureta a 9 and complain about visuals? Interesting...VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? Arifureta had bad visuals? Interesting... I do not like this because it does not use shading (except for the noses which makes look weird) and the drawings look either sketchy or ... how to put this... with too many corners. Also Arifureta had a great story . This is a dime a dozen. I have read at least 10 korean manga with the exact same story as this anime. VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: oh its obvius you dont know anything about animation, do you even know the basic principles? like the famous 12? Because it really doesnt seem like it if you are mainly talking about physic laws, muscle and bones, i REALLY dought that in 20 years you know less than me who has just been interesting in animation in about a year, so no need to lie here. And you complain about the shading, and yea no shading, nope, none whatsoever, its not like the clothes were stupidly detailed with shade nope, obviusly not.ElGoblino said: nightcrawlercyp said: VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? And here ladies and gentlemen we have someone that doesn't know shit about art and animation but he likes to talk and give his opinion and thinks both are same thing. The guy asks him how does this show have bad animation when in fact it's actually great and he responds with why everyone has red noses which has nothing to do animation. Facepalm well animation has been a passion of mine for over 20 years , studied it, created some 2d, 3d, game animation, done my share of art both in pencil and digital (see deviantart page with same name) but is clear I have no idea what I am talking about. True good animation accounts for the mechanics of biological bodies that have bones and muscles and respond to physical laws but hey that does not matter, right? MegamiRem said: Good animation takes into account the laws of physics and makes movements look natural. Also about the visuals they are supposed to represent real human being but there are a ton of parts not well drawn at all.nightcrawlercyp said: Bad visual? Bad animation? Lmao wut? Care to elaborate what good animation and visuals are then lmao?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Dust_Eyezz said: nightcrawlercyp said: you gave arifureta a 9 and complain about visuals? Interesting...VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? Arifureta had bad visuals? Interesting... I do not like this because it does not use shading (except for the noses which makes look weird) and the drawings look either sketchy or ... how to put this... with too many corners. Also Arifureta had a great story . This is a dime a dozen. I have read at least 10 korean manga with the exact same story as this anime. kid.. you are clearly out of your league. You read some stuff here and there and think you know animation. The first animation I did was on an HC computer... have you even heard of stuff like this? Also I am complaining of shading when it comes to faces which are more important than clothes in my humble opinion. And if you are such a big shot show something you made you consider good. 1. why does all that pretentious garbage exists: because people are lemings 2. I asked that because the question was addressed to someone with the account dizzy eyes and you answered 3. my point was that I studied both drawing and animation on all kind of environments. The 3d images from my page for instance are done in 3dmax 2 on a pentium 1 with 64mb ram . Most of my work is in pencil and paper. 4. yes it means you know much less. You can have animation by redrawing by pasting something from memory, by using sprites, by using layers and decomposing objects into movable parts and moving them independently. You can also have animation by drawing every position of the character body... of course then the chance to go into uncanny valley with bodies that do not respect the laws of physics is greater. 5. oh, and they might not be impressive but still better than the ones in this episode . 1. if you say so. I am nowhere near the level I can make money from my art but I still maintain am better than the hack that draw this episode 2. I am not confusing anything. Yes I do not have animations on that site, but I did create plenty. Also you do realize CGI and games animate characters in various ways, right? Not sure why you keep insisting they have 0 correlation. 3. the animation has to look natural. If it looks unnatural to the person watching it it breaks the immersion 4.I understand you are a huge fan of certain people. Personally I do not know any of them. I generally appreciate the work without looking on who did the work. 5. Conveying the right emotion... are you a girl by any chance? They seem to have total disregard of reality and care only about emotions |
Jul 7, 2020 3:56 AM
#303
| Hope we can go back and see all the stuff that was skipped over (mainly the recruitment stage) but save that it was a good premiere -> here’s hoping they don’t really rush it |
Jul 7, 2020 4:12 AM
#304
| The cho aniki reference was the best part of this first episode. I dont think I'll watch more of this anime, but I'll give it credit, despite beig too fast paced, at least is not as boring as tower of fod |
| :v |
Jul 7, 2020 4:23 AM
#305
VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: Again you ego is through the roof, you art is not better than the anime, thats obvius, you know it, everyone in the world with knows it. My point wasnt that cgi correlating to animation, it was that KNOWING A FFUCKING OLD COMPUTER HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FUCKING CONVERSATION AND KNOWING HOW TO ANIMATE, besides, if you try to replicate 2d animation with CGI, do you know what happens? It looks bad, really fucking bad, low fps is probably the biggest problem with cgi animation this days, with orange and cyclone graphics the only ones that actually try to make it their own type of style. Ok i agree with number 3, but the thing is, THIS ANIMATION DOES LOOK NATURAL, it makes its objetive which is create hype and excitement, its fast, fluid in some parts and more choppy in others, is that bad? NO. The more choppy animation was done by the director seong ho park, and thats just his animation style. I know your biggest gripe on the show is the noses, which again i dont really like it too, but again thats a character design problem, not animation, those are too diferent things. 4, ok thats fine, i follow people because i apreciate their work, i like to say congrats on twitter when an animator does a good job on an episode, i like to comeback to see their animation and the more you look into it the more you want to see more of it and the more you apreciate their work because you understand that it is hard, you understand that not everyone is capable of what they are doing, but if you dont want to follow people, thats fine, thats on you, but criticizing the work of people that are CLEARLY having passion and dedication with their amazing animation, i just cant let that slide. No im not a girl, when i was talking about emotion, its the objetive of the animation, like i said before here it was to create hype and excitement, THOSE ARE EMOTIONS.VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: saying that your drawing are better than in the episode is just, fucking retarded i dont care your ego is through the fucking roof, god dam. The funny thing is that you obviusly confuse drawing with animation, thats just a fact, even then its pretty fucking dumb what you are saying, your point 4 doesnt have nothing to do with you knowing a computer, 0 correlation. Its obvius you dont know how to animate, just drawing, and making 3D models, is that animating? NO you dumbass. Animation is movement, it may be subtle character animation like in kyoani shows, or it may be action pack like in opm. Does the drawing need to go with the laws of physics, of course not man. There are exceptions of course, mainly when animating subtle movements and character acting, but it doesnt need to be perfect, take keiichiro watanabe or even a better example, yutaka nakamura, they are praised as animation gods, do they make their animation go exacly how physics work? OBVIUSLY NOT, THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF ANIMATION, animation is all about movement and convenying the correct emotion. Its obvius you dont know what sakugabooru is, because you totally ditched that point, so again, i recomend you go there and see for yourself what animation really is. VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: uhmmm no i dont have 2 accounts. Saying cooking is the most basic skill of all is tecnicly correct and wrong at the same time, if it was so easy why do you think there is so many "pretentious garbage" when people can just follow the recipe, like you said, its never that simple. The computer is, again, not a good argument, first you knowing a computer isnt a good correlation to you knowing something about drawing, yes most animation is done in computers (although in japan is still mostly paper), does that mean that knowing an old computer make you know about animation? No, i could also ask my grampa about that and maybe he would know that computer, does he know how to draw? No. I also said i didnt know how to draw, i not that i didnt understand the basic principals of animation, and the process of japanese animation to be precise, because i do know, i search for that, like how you draw, i search for animation as a hobby. i dont see any bad of doing it, i saw your drawings, are they that impressive? No. Will i judge you for it? No, because honestly im much worse. Does that mean i know less than you about animation, obviusly not. If you want to learn more about animation, go to sakugabooru and hit the random button until you actually understand what animation is. To see the process of animation i recomend the strive for animation channel. There are also alot of people on twitter that show and talk about japanese animation, like randomsakuga, kvin, purplegeth, ashita, and alot othersVP2003boi said: Is a very old computer, knew only qbasic 4 . Yes it means that maybe you do not understand certain principles of realistic drawing. No, but you do need to know some basic stuff to differentiate between good food and pretentious garbage which many city folks do not know... and cooking is the most basic skill of all... I mean you just follow the recipe for most part. If you have no idea about the process of drawing and animation how can you judge what is going on? you make little to no sense. Also do you have two accounts? nightcrawlercyp said: Honestly i i dont know what an HC computer is, i googled it and alot of stuff apeared, but the biggest one seemed that it just means home computer? Meh, i dont care, that argument is fucking trash, calling me a kid inst a very good one too, im pretty much a kid tho, im pretty young, but honestly i dont mind. Oh and i dont know how to draw, thats that mean anything? obviusly not, do you need to know how to cook like gordan ramsay to apreciate his food? Probably not right? And another example is yuichiro fukushi, he is my favourite animation producer, he doesnt know how to draw, but he knows which people KNOW how to draw, so yea that argument is also not that great. The shading on the faces, i can kinda see i guess, its industry average pretty much, not amazing yea.Dust_Eyezz said: Then maybe you should rewatch it... not very generic from my pov. about CGI... is clear you grew up with movies that abuse CGI and that look like garbage so you have no idea how real stuff should look like. nightcrawlercyp said: Arifureta and good story? What did u smoke? Arifureta is the most generic garbage ever? It's like any other Isekai betray kinda stuff? Have you even watched the same arifureta as me? African meme movies have better CGI...ElGoblino said: nightcrawlercyp said: VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? And here ladies and gentlemen we have someone that doesn't know shit about art and animation but he likes to talk and give his opinion and thinks both are same thing. The guy asks him how does this show have bad animation when in fact it's actually great and he responds with why everyone has red noses which has nothing to do animation. Facepalm well animation has been a passion of mine for over 20 years , studied it, created some 2d, 3d, game animation, done my share of art both in pencil and digital (see deviantart page with same name) but is clear I have no idea what I am talking about. True good animation accounts for the mechanics of biological bodies that have bones and muscles and respond to physical laws but hey that does not matter, right? MegamiRem said: Good animation takes into account the laws of physics and makes movements look natural. Also about the visuals they are supposed to represent real human being but there are a ton of parts not well drawn at all.nightcrawlercyp said: Bad visual? Bad animation? Lmao wut? Care to elaborate what good animation and visuals are then lmao?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Dust_Eyezz said: nightcrawlercyp said: you gave arifureta a 9 and complain about visuals? Interesting...VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? Arifureta had bad visuals? Interesting... I do not like this because it does not use shading (except for the noses which makes look weird) and the drawings look either sketchy or ... how to put this... with too many corners. Also Arifureta had a great story . This is a dime a dozen. I have read at least 10 korean manga with the exact same story as this anime. VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: oh its obvius you dont know anything about animation, do you even know the basic principles? like the famous 12? Because it really doesnt seem like it if you are mainly talking about physic laws, muscle and bones, i REALLY dought that in 20 years you know less than me who has just been interesting in animation in about a year, so no need to lie here. And you complain about the shading, and yea no shading, nope, none whatsoever, its not like the clothes were stupidly detailed with shade nope, obviusly not.ElGoblino said: nightcrawlercyp said: VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? And here ladies and gentlemen we have someone that doesn't know shit about art and animation but he likes to talk and give his opinion and thinks both are same thing. The guy asks him how does this show have bad animation when in fact it's actually great and he responds with why everyone has red noses which has nothing to do animation. Facepalm well animation has been a passion of mine for over 20 years , studied it, created some 2d, 3d, game animation, done my share of art both in pencil and digital (see deviantart page with same name) but is clear I have no idea what I am talking about. True good animation accounts for the mechanics of biological bodies that have bones and muscles and respond to physical laws but hey that does not matter, right? MegamiRem said: Good animation takes into account the laws of physics and makes movements look natural. Also about the visuals they are supposed to represent real human being but there are a ton of parts not well drawn at all.nightcrawlercyp said: Bad visual? Bad animation? Lmao wut? Care to elaborate what good animation and visuals are then lmao?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Dust_Eyezz said: nightcrawlercyp said: you gave arifureta a 9 and complain about visuals? Interesting...VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? Arifureta had bad visuals? Interesting... I do not like this because it does not use shading (except for the noses which makes look weird) and the drawings look either sketchy or ... how to put this... with too many corners. Also Arifureta had a great story . This is a dime a dozen. I have read at least 10 korean manga with the exact same story as this anime. kid.. you are clearly out of your league. You read some stuff here and there and think you know animation. The first animation I did was on an HC computer... have you even heard of stuff like this? Also I am complaining of shading when it comes to faces which are more important than clothes in my humble opinion. And if you are such a big shot show something you made you consider good. 1. why does all that pretentious garbage exists: because people are lemings 2. I asked that because the question was addressed to someone with the account dizzy eyes and you answered 3. my point was that I studied both drawing and animation on all kind of environments. The 3d images from my page for instance are done in 3dmax 2 on a pentium 1 with 64mb ram . Most of my work is in pencil and paper. 4. yes it means you know much less. You can have animation by redrawing by pasting something from memory, by using sprites, by using layers and decomposing objects into movable parts and moving them independently. You can also have animation by drawing every position of the character body... of course then the chance to go into uncanny valley with bodies that do not respect the laws of physics is greater. 5. oh, and they might not be impressive but still better than the ones in this episode . 1. if you say so. I am nowhere near the level I can make money from my art but I still maintain am better than the hack that draw this episode 2. I am not confusing anything. Yes I do not have animations on that site, but I did create plenty. Also you do realize CGI and games animate characters in various ways, right? Not sure why you keep insisting they have 0 correlation. 3. the animation has to look natural. If it looks unnatural to the person watching it it breaks the immersion 4.I understand you are a huge fan of certain people. Personally I do not know any of them. I generally appreciate the work without looking on who did the work. 5. Conveying the right emotion... are you a girl by any chance? They seem to have total disregard of reality and care only about emotions I criticize the work of people that are not good at it. I understand you are a hardcore fan. Good for you. You just did not bring any worth while arguments to the table up to this point. My point was that I have doing animation with crappy tools which takes more skill... something you have none or any idea of. So since you keep repeating the same sentence regardless of what I am saying guess this conversation is done |
Jul 7, 2020 4:31 AM
#306
| Opening was pretty good the dubstep gets you hyped for the upcoming episode. I was a little taken aback at first after being thrown into the world but midway through the chase scene I got into it. The fight scenes appear to be extremely clean with really amazing combat animation. Can't wait for the next episode!!!! |
Jul 7, 2020 4:57 AM
#307
nightcrawlercyp said: Yea, its not like i didnt even like the episode, yea obviusly not. I dont bring good arguments? really? oh they are so bad that you dont bother to adress them, i at least try to adress yours, so you should at least counterargument, thats the basic discussion. Ok i agree there is no point arguing with people that obviusly cant see their mistakes, and even if they do see them, dont want to say they doVP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: saying that your drawing are better than in the episode is just, fucking retarded i dont care your ego is through the fucking roof, god dam. The funny thing is that you obviusly confuse drawing with animation, thats just a fact, even then its pretty fucking dumb what you are saying, your point 4 doesnt have nothing to do with you knowing a computer, 0 correlation. Its obvius you dont know how to animate, just drawing, and making 3D models, is that animating? NO you dumbass. Animation is movement, it may be subtle character animation like in kyoani shows, or it may be action pack like in opm. Does the drawing need to go with the laws of physics, of course not man. There are exceptions of course, mainly when animating subtle movements and character acting, but it doesnt need to be perfect, take keiichiro watanabe or even a better example, yutaka nakamura, they are praised as animation gods, do they make their animation go exacly how physics work? OBVIUSLY NOT, THAT IS NOT THE POINT OF ANIMATION, animation is all about movement and convenying the correct emotion. Its obvius you dont know what sakugabooru is, because you totally ditched that point, so again, i recomend you go there and see for yourself what animation really is. VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: uhmmm no i dont have 2 accounts. Saying cooking is the most basic skill of all is tecnicly correct and wrong at the same time, if it was so easy why do you think there is so many "pretentious garbage" when people can just follow the recipe, like you said, its never that simple. The computer is, again, not a good argument, first you knowing a computer isnt a good correlation to you knowing something about drawing, yes most animation is done in computers (although in japan is still mostly paper), does that mean that knowing an old computer make you know about animation? No, i could also ask my grampa about that and maybe he would know that computer, does he know how to draw? No. I also said i didnt know how to draw, i not that i didnt understand the basic principals of animation, and the process of japanese animation to be precise, because i do know, i search for that, like how you draw, i search for animation as a hobby. i dont see any bad of doing it, i saw your drawings, are they that impressive? No. Will i judge you for it? No, because honestly im much worse. Does that mean i know less than you about animation, obviusly not. If you want to learn more about animation, go to sakugabooru and hit the random button until you actually understand what animation is. To see the process of animation i recomend the strive for animation channel. There are also alot of people on twitter that show and talk about japanese animation, like randomsakuga, kvin, purplegeth, ashita, and alot othersVP2003boi said: Is a very old computer, knew only qbasic 4 . Yes it means that maybe you do not understand certain principles of realistic drawing. No, but you do need to know some basic stuff to differentiate between good food and pretentious garbage which many city folks do not know... and cooking is the most basic skill of all... I mean you just follow the recipe for most part. If you have no idea about the process of drawing and animation how can you judge what is going on? you make little to no sense. Also do you have two accounts? nightcrawlercyp said: Honestly i i dont know what an HC computer is, i googled it and alot of stuff apeared, but the biggest one seemed that it just means home computer? Meh, i dont care, that argument is fucking trash, calling me a kid inst a very good one too, im pretty much a kid tho, im pretty young, but honestly i dont mind. Oh and i dont know how to draw, thats that mean anything? obviusly not, do you need to know how to cook like gordan ramsay to apreciate his food? Probably not right? And another example is yuichiro fukushi, he is my favourite animation producer, he doesnt know how to draw, but he knows which people KNOW how to draw, so yea that argument is also not that great. The shading on the faces, i can kinda see i guess, its industry average pretty much, not amazing yea.Dust_Eyezz said: Then maybe you should rewatch it... not very generic from my pov. about CGI... is clear you grew up with movies that abuse CGI and that look like garbage so you have no idea how real stuff should look like. nightcrawlercyp said: Arifureta and good story? What did u smoke? Arifureta is the most generic garbage ever? It's like any other Isekai betray kinda stuff? Have you even watched the same arifureta as me? African meme movies have better CGI...ElGoblino said: nightcrawlercyp said: VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? And here ladies and gentlemen we have someone that doesn't know shit about art and animation but he likes to talk and give his opinion and thinks both are same thing. The guy asks him how does this show have bad animation when in fact it's actually great and he responds with why everyone has red noses which has nothing to do animation. Facepalm well animation has been a passion of mine for over 20 years , studied it, created some 2d, 3d, game animation, done my share of art both in pencil and digital (see deviantart page with same name) but is clear I have no idea what I am talking about. True good animation accounts for the mechanics of biological bodies that have bones and muscles and respond to physical laws but hey that does not matter, right? MegamiRem said: Good animation takes into account the laws of physics and makes movements look natural. Also about the visuals they are supposed to represent real human being but there are a ton of parts not well drawn at all.nightcrawlercyp said: Bad visual? Bad animation? Lmao wut? Care to elaborate what good animation and visuals are then lmao?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Dust_Eyezz said: nightcrawlercyp said: you gave arifureta a 9 and complain about visuals? Interesting...VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? Arifureta had bad visuals? Interesting... I do not like this because it does not use shading (except for the noses which makes look weird) and the drawings look either sketchy or ... how to put this... with too many corners. Also Arifureta had a great story . This is a dime a dozen. I have read at least 10 korean manga with the exact same story as this anime. VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: oh its obvius you dont know anything about animation, do you even know the basic principles? like the famous 12? Because it really doesnt seem like it if you are mainly talking about physic laws, muscle and bones, i REALLY dought that in 20 years you know less than me who has just been interesting in animation in about a year, so no need to lie here. And you complain about the shading, and yea no shading, nope, none whatsoever, its not like the clothes were stupidly detailed with shade nope, obviusly not.ElGoblino said: nightcrawlercyp said: VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? And here ladies and gentlemen we have someone that doesn't know shit about art and animation but he likes to talk and give his opinion and thinks both are same thing. The guy asks him how does this show have bad animation when in fact it's actually great and he responds with why everyone has red noses which has nothing to do animation. Facepalm well animation has been a passion of mine for over 20 years , studied it, created some 2d, 3d, game animation, done my share of art both in pencil and digital (see deviantart page with same name) but is clear I have no idea what I am talking about. True good animation accounts for the mechanics of biological bodies that have bones and muscles and respond to physical laws but hey that does not matter, right? MegamiRem said: Good animation takes into account the laws of physics and makes movements look natural. Also about the visuals they are supposed to represent real human being but there are a ton of parts not well drawn at all.nightcrawlercyp said: Bad visual? Bad animation? Lmao wut? Care to elaborate what good animation and visuals are then lmao?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Dust_Eyezz said: nightcrawlercyp said: you gave arifureta a 9 and complain about visuals? Interesting...VP2003boi said: nightcrawlercyp said: wait bad animation? we watched the same episode right?Is this a bad clone of DOA from someone that seems unable to properly draw a human nose for some reason? I mean I have trouble with them as well but I do not make everyone look like they are drunk or having a flu. Also the drawing style is really bad AnimeFA78N said: Okay guys i need to ask something hows this episode is compare to TOG Episode 1? pls give me your thoughts? I liked TOG but his one is really bad I mean bad visuals bad animation and almost nothing is explained, the comedy falls flat and so on Maybe.. I do not know what you watched. But since you seem to be a fan of the original material can you explain why everyone looks like Rudolf the red nosed reindeer? Arifureta had bad visuals? Interesting... I do not like this because it does not use shading (except for the noses which makes look weird) and the drawings look either sketchy or ... how to put this... with too many corners. Also Arifureta had a great story . This is a dime a dozen. I have read at least 10 korean manga with the exact same story as this anime. kid.. you are clearly out of your league. You read some stuff here and there and think you know animation. The first animation I did was on an HC computer... have you even heard of stuff like this? Also I am complaining of shading when it comes to faces which are more important than clothes in my humble opinion. And if you are such a big shot show something you made you consider good. 1. why does all that pretentious garbage exists: because people are lemings 2. I asked that because the question was addressed to someone with the account dizzy eyes and you answered 3. my point was that I studied both drawing and animation on all kind of environments. The 3d images from my page for instance are done in 3dmax 2 on a pentium 1 with 64mb ram . Most of my work is in pencil and paper. 4. yes it means you know much less. You can have animation by redrawing by pasting something from memory, by using sprites, by using layers and decomposing objects into movable parts and moving them independently. You can also have animation by drawing every position of the character body... of course then the chance to go into uncanny valley with bodies that do not respect the laws of physics is greater. 5. oh, and they might not be impressive but still better than the ones in this episode . 1. if you say so. I am nowhere near the level I can make money from my art but I still maintain am better than the hack that draw this episode 2. I am not confusing anything. Yes I do not have animations on that site, but I did create plenty. Also you do realize CGI and games animate characters in various ways, right? Not sure why you keep insisting they have 0 correlation. 3. the animation has to look natural. If it looks unnatural to the person watching it it breaks the immersion 4.I understand you are a huge fan of certain people. Personally I do not know any of them. I generally appreciate the work without looking on who did the work. 5. Conveying the right emotion... are you a girl by any chance? They seem to have total disregard of reality and care only about emotions I criticize the work of people that are not good at it. I understand you are a hardcore fan. Good for you. You just did not bring any worth while arguments to the table up to this point. My point was that I have doing animation with crappy tools which takes more skill... something you have none or any idea of. So since you keep repeating the same sentence regardless of what I am saying guess this conversation is done |
Jul 7, 2020 5:16 AM
#308
| Solid first episode. Honestly, this episode didn't even have to try, it sucked me right in and I'm invested. I like it way more than Tower of God. Granted, I read the webtoon/manhwa of this, however, I only read up to chapter 50 or so, might pick it up again. But that was like five years ago, my memory is kind of hazy so I need to re-read it from the beginning. It was wacky and stupid but tons of fun. Like both the OP and Ed. Animation seems good so far, loving the voice acting. Jin Mori creating a whole scenario of the grandma was pretty funny. Also, I love how it actually takes place in South Korea. They didn''t change the names like Baam was changed into Yoru. |
| 臭い- |
Jul 7, 2020 5:27 AM
#309
| TV Production cannot be paced like a book, so stop comparing it... The pacing is great for what the show is to my understanding. I don't expect an oscar story. Hopefully, there's no repetitive jokes for 5year olds (TOG) or any annoying tropes. Character design is interesting excluding the Rudolph red noses, lets hope there's more to them than a sob story and the logic isnt bad man is bad cause bad and good is good cause nakama. |
Jul 7, 2020 5:28 AM
#310
-Stray said: If people called ToG the HxH of manhwa, this right here is the DBZ of manhwa, ya’ll aint ready for whats about to happen! Ya’ll gonna get awesome fights here!!!! I’ve read the webtoon and this is definitely my top favorite! 2nd UnOrdinary! 1st ep really delivered, also dont expect a 1:1 adaptation here, this will obviously be rushed based on the number of ep and what the poster teases. ToG is the ugly little brother of HxH that no one should acknowledge |
Jul 7, 2020 5:29 AM
#311
| This was amazing....but man those red noses and ears are gonna be annoying. I wish certain shows would stop doing that. Reminds me of the Shera reboot where everyone has a line on her nose. |
| I got a Masters degree. I don't have to worry bout school anymore. |
Jul 7, 2020 5:38 AM
#312
| Correct me if im wrong but from what I remember in the manhwa the first round as a battle royal was in a completely different setting, had no spectators or stage and the tournament itself seemed pretty secretive as a whole |
| A Wise Man Once Said: #(%!*@)+$& |
Jul 7, 2020 5:49 AM
#313
Kinben69 said: SirTristram said: Kinben69 said: SirTristram said: If this webtoon and ToG were hyped this much, I don't want to experience rest of them. Imagine seeing boku no hero academia episode 1 and saying you don't want to experience the rest of anime/manga I would be judgemental like I am at the moment, not gonna lie. It is common sense actually, if you find a certain mediums most praised works decent at most then maybe they aren't meant for you or they aren't up to your standards. At least the first few suggestions someone gets when starting to anime/manga is usually really good. Regardless, I'm not a close minded person -hopefully-. I would be more than happy to give a chance to your must read/great webtoons. Who knows, maybe you can open a whole new medium for me. This is one of the most famous webtoons being one of the top 3 just like Naruto,One Piece, Bleach. It doesn't mean it is the only genre existing here. If you judge all the medium based on the most famous work you will miss a lot of things that you may like. It doesn't mean is the best story in webtoon, it doesn't mean it has the most interesting characters in webtoon. Is just that is one of the oldest and one that many people enjoy. Since Naruto is one of the most famous anime it means it is one of the best? LOL, not even close You are just rambling, there is only one way to solve this debate. All you have to do is recommending me something that you think is great -if it isn't popular at all + points for your argument- and I'll read it objectively hoping it is actually good. Not a hard thing to do considering there should be at least a few really good stories, like in any other medium. I'm open to new experiences, you can easily prove your point to me if you are right. I've never seen people labeling the big 3 as a top tier manga/story -except one piece-. They are/were undeniably popular shonen mangas -more popular as an anime probably-, but that is all. If you check the top manga list you'll see only one One Piece is in the top 100 (ranked 5). Naruto is ranked 561 and Bleach is ranked 1710. Compare it to both Tower of God and God of Highschool being in the top 50 (2. and 32. respectively) you can see it is not only about the popularity. If what you claim is true and they are ranked high because of their popularity alone, then manwha readers must be poor critics. What I think is the case here though, there aren't really many good manhwas. It is a simple induction actually, whetever it holds till the end or not. They all seem like a cheap fanfictions of their manga counterparts, catering to fans with lots of fanservice and no substance. Nevertheless these are all my assumptions about the medium from what I've seen so far. I'll be more than happy to admit if I am wrong. |
Jul 7, 2020 5:54 AM
#314
| The best manhwa I read was Bastard. IDK if it's the best but is really good. Also why everyone likes to be a critic nowadays? Can't you just base it on the fact if you enjoy it or not? Also yes there are not as many webtoons as mangas since webtoon are relatively new. The webtoon craze started like 10 years ago max I would say. Edit: Actually webtoon was launched in 2014 so even less |
Kinben69Jul 7, 2020 6:10 AM
Jul 7, 2020 6:59 AM
#315
| What’s with this crazy and insane sakuga? I really want to know about the animators!! Though an underwhelming start, I'd say. Let's see what happens. |
Jul 7, 2020 7:02 AM
#316
| Not as bad as I expected it to be A lot of cliches already. Has potential |
Jul 7, 2020 7:03 AM
#317
| Goddamn, I was so invested at that, that I though that scene at the end was just the half way point that episode went by so fast. I like the humor of the show it actually made me laugh. Overall enjoyed the hell out of this episode can't wait for more. Those crunchyroll and webtoon ad placements though. And this is some wallpaper worthy shit. |
Jul 7, 2020 7:09 AM
#318
-Stray said: If people called ToG the HxH of manhwa, this right here is the DBZ of manhwa, ya’ll aint ready for whats about to happen! Ya’ll gonna get awesome fights here!!!! I’ve read the webtoon and this is definitely my top favorite! 2nd UnOrdinary! 1st ep really delivered, also dont expect a 1:1 adaptation here, this will obviously be rushed based on the number of ep and what the poster teases. Seems like you've just been introduced to manhwas. |
Jul 7, 2020 7:35 AM
#319
Jul 7, 2020 8:05 AM
#320
| So people giving it high score because of animation ??? 1st episode is boring and fights are boring. Animation might be good but the fights are trash when you compare to something like Baki and Kengan Ashura. I just hope it get better later. Weak start so far |
Jul 7, 2020 8:22 AM
#321
| I enjoyed more the persecution of the thief that the whole fighting part. I think that means this is no my type of anime... |
Jul 7, 2020 8:32 AM
#322
Jul 7, 2020 8:36 AM
#323
| Super impressed, much better than tower of god animation and art IMO Seems like a nice shounen, will definitely watch |
Jul 7, 2020 10:17 AM
#324
| Not much to say about the story yet and there wasn't much world-building besides there being some kind of tournament you get scouted for. But it was very stylish and it looks like a lot of love went into animating this. Not a fan of the Tumblr Noses |
Jul 7, 2020 10:52 AM
#325
| Not bad for the first episode. Those 3 Main Characters look loveable. Other characters also look badass when showing off their skill. Not a fan with the op and ed, need to listen to them again to decided. And those visible red nose and ears.... looks weird...but the animation looks fine so far.. |
Jul 7, 2020 11:05 AM
#326
Jul 7, 2020 12:42 PM
#327
| I actually really like this episode. The OP especially has a lot of charm in it. Arigato studio MAPPA, already much better than ToG |
Jul 7, 2020 1:09 PM
#328
| Ngl, I was going into this with low expectations, but the first episode was quite a banger! Also that OP is LIT! Key visual really didn't make me like the character designs, but going through the episode, it grew on me a bit! Animation is amazing! I guess I am hooked after all! Can't wait to see more! |
Jul 7, 2020 1:12 PM
#329
ItsBritneyBitch said: -Stray said: If people called ToG the HxH of manhwa, this right here is the DBZ of manhwa, ya’ll aint ready for whats about to happen! Ya’ll gonna get awesome fights here!!!! I’ve read the webtoon and this is definitely my top favorite! 2nd UnOrdinary! 1st ep really delivered, also dont expect a 1:1 adaptation here, this will obviously be rushed based on the number of ep and what the poster teases. ToG is the ugly little brother of HxH that no one should acknowledge I can't believe that people would have the gall to put ToG on the same level as HxH |
Jul 7, 2020 1:39 PM
#330
| Characters seem memorable, art style checks out, humor spot on - really enjoyed watching it. Though, I really wanted a realisitc martial arts show without characters being slung into concret walls, I must admit the fights were fun to watch. Especially the outlandish move of stealing the katana with the toes despite wearing sandals. So far not really strong but I am excited to see where this is headin twoards. |
Jul 7, 2020 1:43 PM
#331
cchigu said: Farabeuf said: Welcome to the world of webtoons. Now only if we get a Solo Leveling anime so that we can complete the whole collection. Ngl, the future of anime is looking grim if these webtoon anime keep getting traction.God that was absolutely awful. I literally cringed at 3 points during the episode. I confess I only picked this up because MAPPA was doing it, and I generally never drop anything before I've seen a third of a season, but if its all like this, its gonna be a tough watch. All hype and no substance. The jokes were flat and the character designs were meh too. Let's hope it improves. More than anything, Crunchyroll throwing the kitchen sink at hyping them up is doing the trick. If these kinds of shows were released on Prime or Netflix no one would care about them one bit and they'd be scoring much lower than they do. |
| "Perhaps there is a universal, absolute truth. Perhaps it justifies every question. But that's beyond the reach of these small hands." Mamoru Oshii There is a cult of ignorance (...) nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that “my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” Isaac Asimov |
Jul 7, 2020 1:56 PM
#332
Jul 7, 2020 2:06 PM
#334
| Funny start! I like that girl bubble gum fighter, i hope see hee im the next episodes. |
Jul 7, 2020 2:15 PM
#335
emraanash said: Don't worry. There's hardly any character development in this. Its good being just basic rule of cool and nothing elseskipping chapters is no good for this webtoon it will affect the characters development and harder for us to understand the storytelling. |
Jul 7, 2020 2:25 PM
#336
| This was much better than I was expecting - makes the ToG adaptation look even worse. 4/5 from me.... |
Jul 7, 2020 2:35 PM
#337
| Gorgeous animation. 5/5 Opening also. NakolHira said: Though an underwhelming start, I'd say. Let's see what happens. Why? |
Taito10Jul 7, 2020 2:39 PM
Jul 7, 2020 2:41 PM
#338
| Well at least it didn't have shitty graphics like ToG |
| شقایق، اینجا من، خیلی غریبم |
Jul 7, 2020 2:49 PM
#339
qcxw said: It would've been cool if they dumped some exposition. So far theres literally zero reason to care about anything happening in this show. Some kind of hotshit norules tourney everybody is incredibly excited about yet have no idea what it actually is. No world-building - what the hell exactly are the superpowers? What their extent is? I couldn't even tell whether the girl hitting a sing with her face and walking like nothing happened supposed to be an over-the-top comedy or shes actually strong and badass. The animation is great tho. It's fluid, impactful, nicely choreographed. Also, how to establish an OP main character 101: show us a flashback of them crying and a teacher figure telling them be strong and face the hardships. Honetsly i have no idea how anybody can consider this to be a solid start. I couldnt have describe it better. |
| :v |
Jul 7, 2020 3:01 PM
#340
| The first half was a lot of stupid fun over the top action that I really enjoyed. The second half, when we got to the arena, was more stupid action, except the not the fun kind, I was honestly bored in this part of the episode in spite of the excellent action direction throughout. |
Jul 7, 2020 3:03 PM
#341
| Real banger but it felt rushed. Overall enjoying. Totally loved Mori. |
Jul 7, 2020 3:31 PM
#342
| It seems like it has the same feel as the manhwa, which is very promising, as that manhaw is at least top 10 all time storywise for me personally. Dae-Wi - Mori - Mi-ra trio is just so epic. I think I'll reread the whole thing. Fighting scenes look great to be honest. Pretty nicely done for a premiere! Dislike the op love the ed. |
SholeJul 7, 2020 3:35 PM
Jul 7, 2020 3:35 PM
#343
| glad to see them jump right into the action! I'm interested in more of it! |
Jul 7, 2020 6:14 PM
#344
| Anyone notice that you can tell if someone is a nobody extra by the fact that they aren't running a fever? |
Jul 7, 2020 6:16 PM
#345
| Rather uninteresting first episode. The first scene was the only part that had any amount of story. But then that first scene had zero relevance to the rest of the episode. The key animation is really nice during the high action sequences; other than those moments, rather average. but the cars and cityscape look yuck. And the indoor backgrounds look yuck. Character designs are ugly as heck. Why does literally everyone have red ears and noses. |
Jul 7, 2020 6:25 PM
#346
| Seems like just good dumb fun. I'm interested. |
Jul 7, 2020 6:27 PM
#347
| Finished the first episode, finally. Imma trying to compared the first episode between these and the last Webtoon adaptation. GOH really had an impressive start, while my comparison show had a lack impression at the beginning. Fortunately, its not turning on to some boredom here on the GOH. Overall its a nice Introduction to the Jun appearance of power, when they were using the impactful matter for the storyline : directly gone into the battle action. Its a surprising. My satisfaction goes high by that decision. Still the whole premises might had some hollow on this Introduction. Could it be filled better? Or its got worsening? So far, by its art design, a composition over it, the overall key animation, a back sounds and tracks, all were in a very good terms. The paced was kinda rushed for me by the very sudden fateful met by the three of them. Idk. But, overall, i might undelining it again, its an okay introduction. Lets see wait to the next episode for seeing the progress of their effort and the development over the story building. Thats it for now. Finally MAPPA do the right choice taking this series rather than a bullshit on the previous season. Time to catch a big fish, righ? |
| Hide and seek is the best offline games on this fatamorgana-called-world-thing. Please comment nicely. I am newbie here. I'm level |
Jul 7, 2020 7:05 PM
#348
| art direction was sick |
Jul 7, 2020 7:15 PM
#349
| Just as @Stark700 said, it was a pretty energetic and fun start. I really liked the quirky style of Jin and Yu and the serious tone of Han. They were very charming and entertaining. The animation was very decent, and the fight scenes and the choreography were really cool as well. The opening and the ending were also very decent and enjoyable. Overall, it was a great first episode I would say. I think The God of High School is going to be one of the best anime of the Summer 2020 season. |
Jul 7, 2020 8:09 PM
#350
| Wow, part of me regret even reading 200 chapters into GOH, so I can get better impact introduction to this series. Going through the OP, the main 3 characters stand out and each having their own unique personality/ability. If the rest of the episodes are 90% consistent animated, then we have GOH as anime of the year. |
More topics from this board
Poll: » The God of High School Episode 6 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 )KANLen09 - Aug 10, 2020 |
175 |
by Balloon_Head
»»
Oct 15, 2:55 AM |
|
Poll: » The God of High School Episode 13 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )SingleH - Sep 28, 2020 |
334 |
by FONZACUS
»»
May 17, 6:01 AM |
|
Poll: » The God of High School Episode 5 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 )bcra - Aug 3, 2020 |
242 |
by npc_635
»»
Mar 29, 5:30 PM |
|
Poll: » The God of High School Episode 4 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )KANLen09 - Jul 27, 2020 |
296 |
by npc_635
»»
Mar 29, 5:02 PM |
|
Poll: » The God of High School Episode 3 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )anime-prime - Jul 20, 2020 |
271 |
by Regest
»»
Feb 12, 1:18 PM |
