Kagami said: XHellScytheX said: Now Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the presidency. Now really good things may actually get done in America. I'm in a very good mood. And I hope salty Libertarians will cease the unnecessary protests and give Trump a chance. They even said on Fox News that they want our people to coexist, but that can't be achieved with childish denial. I look forward to the future of this nation. I'm also curios to see if Trump will stay true to his plan to build a wall. Once again, everybody protests. Protesting is allowed in our country and some protests have been really iconic. You can call it unnecessary and say give Trump a chance, but that's easy for you to say. I'm not against peaceful protesting. Its just that in this situation, its absolutely meaningless since its not going to magically remove Trump from office. I'm also concerned that things might get out of hand and violent like they tend to do in protests like these. |
 |
Kagami said: XHellScytheX said: Now Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the presidency. Now really good things may actually get done in America. I'm in a very good mood. And I hope salty Libertarians will cease the unnecessary protests and give Trump a chance. They even said on Fox News that they want our people to coexist, but that can't be achieved with childish denial. I look forward to the future of this nation. I'm also curios to see if Trump will stay true to his plan to build a wall. Once again, everybody protests. Protesting is allowed in our country and some protests have been really iconic. You can call it unnecessary and say give Trump a chance, but that's easy for you to say. Indeed. And as long as they remain as such, there's no problem. If people try to get Trump unelected (idk how it works in America) then there's a problem. |
╮ (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.) ╭ |
XHellScytheX said: Kagami said: Once again, everybody protests. Protesting is allowed in our country and some protests have been really iconic. You can call it unnecessary and say give Trump a chance, but that's easy for you to say. I'm not against peaceful protesting. Its just that in this situation, its absolutely meaningless since its not going to magically remove Trump from office. I'm also concerned that things might get out of hand and violent like they tend to do in protests like these. I agree with avoiding violent protesting like the people that destroyed that bridge, but am all for protesting and having our voices heard. People aren't going to just nod and give Trump a chance 24 hours after a controversial president was elected for office. Heck, not even a week after he comes in office. Trump needs to do good for the country and prove he was worthy of the title. Protesting isn't childish denial, but rather making our voices heard. I promise you if Hillary won, there would of been protesting. I mean, I even saw an article if Hillary won, people would go to the white house in arms. |
 |
RedArmyShogun said: Tourist said: You need money for that adding that the wall would be useless due to the tunnels. It is also necessary that Trump has the courage to challenge the Jewish World, otherwise your hopes will be crushed. Good point, set up machine gun nests, barbed wire, and ground penetrating mines. Then Trump shall replace the pope, and call for a new crusade. Those who directly dominate the finances and economy of USA, they do it indirectly with Mexico. It is no use challenging the poor people from Mexico if you do not have the courage to challenge the powerful people that avoid that Mexicans can develop. It's like trying to remove the cobwebs without killing the spider. Accept it, if Trump does not have the courage to challenge Universal Judaism, his words does not can crystallize into something efficient. Maybe you need to suck similar breasts to the woman on your avatar (but real), that could give you the realism that your mind needs. |
_Nemrod_Nov 9, 2016 8:51 PM
 |
traed said: LordPlucky said: I was going to be disappointed either way (Libertarian Party) :/ The upside to all of this is: - Laughing at melodramatic mourning from Liberals - Watching Republicans try to justify every freakin thing he does as good - The memes...ohhh the memes... - More political commentary shows (akin to Daily Show, Colbert Report, etc) - Watching him tick off SJWs with practically every statement he makes There isnt exactly a huge difference with all the similar stances. Trump is a business owner Johnson is a business owner Trump corporate tax 15% Johnson corporate tax 0% Trump wants to eliminate thee board of education. Johnson wants to eliminate the board of education. Trump wants to abandon the Affordable Care Act Johnson wants to abandon the Affordable Care Act Trump wants to limit power of labour unions Johnson wants to eliminate labour unions. Trump wants to raise sales tax to reduce property tax Johnson wants to raise sales tax to reduce property tax They differ some on immigration, law enforcement, military, and environment. Weld bothered me more than Johnson, Weld considered a rifle a "WMD". Weld also wanted more EPA control along with supporting eminent domain. Johnson fudged the numbers on how things ran in New Mexico, they weren't as peachy as he said. He may say he's for repealing ACA, but he's fine with funding Planned Parenthood (I don't support federal funding for ANY health services). I'm also not keen on making Jewish people bake cakes for Nazis either. I would have rather Austin Peterson, but Rand Paul was who I was leaning the most towards though he was running Republican. |
 |
Tourist said: You need money for that adding that the wall would be useless due to the tunnels. It is also necessary that Trump has the courage to challenge the Jewish World, otherwise your hopes will be crushed. I think many Trump supporters are buying into what Trump claims he will do. For starters, Hillary isn't going to prison. Actually, he is backtracking and talking good about her just like Hillary would of for Trump. He is also backtracking on deporting muslims and saying the we will deport the violent ones first. The wall would take so much money and time to build and it wouldn't be finished during his run. If a democrat wins office in 2020 or 2024, they can just make a plan to stop construction. We need to be realistic. |
|
traed said: Considering he wants to further make the US a police state he should be more higher up on authoritarian. "Police state"? What would an authoritarian police state do early on? Exactly, it would take away the guns from the citizen. If you spot Trump actually taking guns away from the general public, then you can bring up this hypothesis again. Until then all I can tell you is that your hallucination is noted. |
 |
Grey-Zone said: traed said: Considering he wants to further make the US a police state he should be more higher up on authoritarian. "Police state"? What would an authoritarian police state do early on? Exactly, it would take away the guns from the citizen. If you spot Trump actually taking guns away from the general public, then you can bring up this hypothesis again. Until then all I can tell you is that your hallucination is noted. Police states have militarised police that are often uncchecked and rule over innocent people. |
| ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
traed said: Grey-Zone said: "Police state"? What would an authoritarian police state do early on? Exactly, it would take away the guns from the citizen. If you spot Trump actually taking guns away from the general public, then you can bring up this hypothesis again. Until then all I can tell you is that your hallucination is noted. Police states have militarised police that are often uncchecked and rule over innocent people. Yes, but police states usually have one thing in common: They don't let their "innocent people" freely buy guns as they please. They also tend to "centralize" things like education. But Trump just happens to be in favor of gun-access, while also being in favor of local education. Other than your delusions or your subjective interpretation of what Trump might have dogwhistled "somehow" in alleged "secret dogwhistling code" there is just no source for your claim. |
Grey-ZoneNov 9, 2016 8:47 PM
|
Tourist said: RedArmyShogun said: Good point, set up machine gun nests, barbed wire, and ground penetrating mines. Then Trump shall replace the pope, and call for a new crusade. Those who directly dominate the finances and economy of USA, they do it indirectly with Mexico. It is no use challenging the poor people from Mexico if you do not have the courage to challenge the powerful people that avoid that Mexicans can develop. It's like trying to remove the cobwebs without killing the spider. Accept it, if Trump does not have the courage to challenge Universal Judaism, his words does not can crystallize into something efficient. Maybe you need to suck similar breasts to the woman on your avatar (but real), that could give you realism back. Or you could learn what Satire is, but no point trying to reason that with you, given the Joo's are behind all of that. I won't say there aren't Jewish people who happen to have lots of wealth (Soros most notably), but I heavily disagree on your opinions in regards to Mexico. They are shit for the same reason the rest of South America and Southern Europe is. The terrible work ethic and easy living cultural group they share in common. With such a mindset and wastefulness, you don't need Jewish overlords keeping them poor or under developed. You can throw money at it, but would it be any different than Greece? They are doing a good enough job themselves. Though on that note, maybe you should go give the guy in your avy a blow job. At least then your head will find some use. Unless DE JOO's took that too. |
RedArmyShogunNov 9, 2016 8:57 PM
| @Kagami Agree, they are not realistic. ..................... RedArmyShogun said: Tourist said: Those who directly dominate the finances and economy of USA, they do it indirectly with Mexico. It is no use challenging the poor people from Mexico if you do not have the courage to challenge the powerful people that avoid that Mexicans can develop. It's like trying to remove the cobwebs without killing the spider. Accept it, if Trump does not have the courage to challenge Universal Judaism, his words does not can crystallize into something efficient. Maybe you need to suck similar breasts to the woman on your avatar (but real), that could give you realism back. Or you could learn what Satire is, but no point trying to reason that with you, given the Joo's are behind all of that. I won't say there aren't Jewish people who happen to have lots of wealth (Soros most notably), but I heavily disagree on your opinions in regards to Mexico. They are shit for the same reason the rest of South America and Southern Europe is. The terrible work ethic and easy living cultural group they share in common. With such a mindset and wastefulness, you don't need Jewish overlords keeping them poor or under developed. You can throw money at it, but would it be any different than Greece? They are doing a good enough job themselves. Though on that note, maybe you should go give the guy in your avy a blow job. At least then your head will find some use. Unless DE JOO's took that too. hahahaha Veamos As a group (colective), Jews are richer and more powerful than Anglo-Saxons. That is a verifiable reality even for Chinese intellectuals. To know who rule a nation, we need to see the group less vulnerable to criticism and you are not part of that group. It is not believable an Anglo-Saxon domain when its pride (behavioral root) is publicly repressed. Not even ancient Greece in its time of worst decay repressed the cultural pride of its inhabitants. I recommend read the book "The International Jew" of Henry Ford. That man is someone who genuinely represents the WASP spirit and you definitely will not see anti-Semitism in his book. He shows by means of raw sources The Jewish domain over the USA. "The Jews and Modern Capitalism" of Werner Sombart also can help increase your perception of reality. Other one is "Tragedy and Hope" of Professor Carroll Quigley (President Bill Clinton’s mentor). The truth is that Soros is just a small member of the immense power that Jews represents. I do not mean to say that all Jews (individuals) are avaricious sufferers who satisfy their craving for power at any cost, but as a collective, they are the center of the USA establishment and lead globalization and anti-nationalisms. It is true that a regression in behavior have influenced on the negative side of Hispanic America and the loss of relevance of Latin Europe, but it is not realistic to ignore the Jewish and Anglo behavior in favor of the lack of development of South America. A good way to understand about this, it is reading the Kissinger report because this one talk about the need to prevent development in regions like South America (take control of its natural resources). Hispanic America and Latin Europe was richer than Anglo-America and Germanic Europe during the Monarchie Era (centuries). However, if you apply "democracy" in psychologies that works best with monarchies, you will undoubtedly encounter many problems. The democracies, settled in our nations finds the majority of the population and that is where we find the origin of many of the current problems in Hispanic America nations. Reading the Prussian Protestant Alexander von Humboldt in his book "Political essay on the kingdom of New Spain" we find. - "The Amerindian peasant is poor but free. Their situation is much better than the peasants of northern Europe, particularly Russians and Germans. The number of slaves is virtually zero. " - "It should be known in Europe! Mexican miners are the best paid in the world, they get six to seven times bigger salary than a German miner. " - "New Spain has a distinct advantage over the United States: the number of slaves, both Africans and mixed race, is almost nonexistant. The number of African slaves in the United States passes a million, which is the sixth of its population. " - "In the city in America, not even in the United States, can display as big and solid scientific institutions as the City of Mexico. The capital and other cities in Mexico, have scientific establishments which can be compared with those in Europe. " Mexico was much richer than USA before it received the "blessing" of democracy and this Prussian intellectual proves it. Your mention of "work ethic" is actually a bias that you have about things that you do not know and understand. On the other hand, Hispanics are a very varied. Any experienced contractor will be able to tell you that Hispanics with Native American heritage often work very hard, while not happen the same with many Hispanics with African heritage. In fact, I am sure that many Mexicans have much greater resistance and performance than Anglo-Americans when we talk about manual labor (factories) http://fortune.com/2015/11/11/chart-work-week-oecd/ All this without counting the world-wide fame about ethics of work and discipline does not correspond to the Anglo-Saxons, but to Prussians and Japanese. USA is not in a position to talk in the name of ethic or discipline. In any case, your response is a reflection of the distorting vision of reality that many Anglo-Saxons have. Remove cobwebs without killing spider? haha good luck with that. Regarding the last part of your comment, I'm sorry, but those behaviors do not go with me. However, you can do something like that if you do not want to suck a pair of realisms. |
_Nemrod_Nov 10, 2016 2:14 PM
|
Kagami said: Congrats to Trump. I don't support him and his face and opinions make me ill, but it is what it is. Let's see how he does. same feel exactly the same way........... |
 |
| Trump: System is rigged FB Friends: Hahahaha this guy is an orange doofus (Trump wins electoral college with less popular votes) FB Friends: WTF RIGGED SYSTEM??? |
 |
Kagami said: Riots are not protesting. They are distrupting peaceXHellScytheX said: Now Republicans control the House, the Senate, and the presidency. Now really good things may actually get done in America. I'm in a very good mood. And I hope salty Libertarians will cease the unnecessary protests and give Trump a chance. They even said on Fox News that they want our people to coexist, but that can't be achieved with childish denial. I look forward to the future of this nation. I'm also curios to see if Trump will stay true to his plan to build a wall. Once again, everybody protests. Protesting is allowed in our country and some protests have been really iconic. You can call it unnecessary and say give Trump a chance, but that's easy for you to say. |
| Twitter and it's consequences had been a disaster for the human race |
AIDSKrillex said: Kagami said: Riots are not protesting. They are distrupting peaceOnce again, everybody protests. Protesting is allowed in our country and some protests have been really iconic. You can call it unnecessary and say give Trump a chance, but that's easy for you to say. Riot is a synonym of protesting, so yes they are. |
|
Still can't deny that riots are still protesting. The thing is, I do agree that forms of protesting are best left avoided. Example: Breaking a bridge. I support clogging streets and marching while holding their signs and chanting their opinion though. We can't live in a dream world though and pretend their would be zero protesting if Hillary won. |
|
| Protesting is OK. But it's no longer "peaceful" the moment it involves vandalism or violence. |
|
Silverstorm said: Kagami said: To fuck what that California user said--And I'm pretty sure back around 1998 that Trump went on record saying republicans are idiots and if he ran for president they'd vote for him. Trump was right. Anyway, I've had time to digest Trump winning. I don't support him, but I've accepted it. Life moves on and rioting won't do anything to change what happened. Cannot stand him at all, but its what it is. I'd rather have him than his vice president. I agree with with about the letting the moment settle, but you must be aware that Pence will be playing a large role as advisor or worse-case, Dick Cheney#2. It like the immortal Cheney, only with a cold featureless face-- Speaking of Pence, is there any chance he will be gone? I don't really know all the political procedures after the elections but I think things would be a bit better with his creepy ass out of the way |
| Good luck to US as it seems like the country will be having major changes |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Kagami said: XHellScytheX said: I'm not against peaceful protesting. Its just that in this situation, its absolutely meaningless since its not going to magically remove Trump from office. I'm also concerned that things might get out of hand and violent like they tend to do in protests like these. I agree with avoiding violent protesting like the people that destroyed that bridge, but am all for protesting and having our voices heard. People aren't going to just nod and give Trump a chance 24 hours after a controversial president was elected for office. Heck, not even a week after he comes in office. Trump needs to do good for the country and prove he was worthy of the title. Protesting isn't childish denial, but rather making our voices heard. I promise you if Hillary won, there would of been protesting. I mean, I even saw an article if Hillary won, people would go to the white house in arms. And like I said, protesting and having your opinions heard is fine. I just didn't like how protesters were telling an interviewer that they wanted there to be harmony in the nation when protesting clearly conveys the opposite effect. And while I do agree that there probably would be protesting if Clinton won, I seriously doubt that armed Americans would go to the white house. The people who write those articles are usually all talk who simply want attention. |
|
| By the way everyone Trump is projected to win the popular vote. They are not finished counting the votes! |
| I fucking love living right now. Truly is a time to be alive! |
Sometimes a single photo collage is all you need to know about a man's character. feel bad about women there hope they turn against him ot: Many of Trump's sweeping promises will be hard, if not impossible, to fulfill haha Xinil said: Just so very disappointed in this outcome. Stay strong everyone, we'll get through this somehow. u know this is bad if Xinil posted in a CE thread |
AllenVonSteinNov 10, 2016 7:25 AM
 |
love how black people always respond with violence, it just shows how intelligent they are !!! -.- Glad their welfare ass didn't have Hillary as President |
 |
| I can't WAIT for the assassinatio.... I mean inauguration! |
| Something interesting: |
|
| BAM! #MAGA Bitches. 2016, the year of memes and dreams. |
on 
| It's an exciting time for USA while the rest of us in the world have our own stuffs to deal with. |
 |
| Popcorn in hand, waiting for the end of the world and racially hypocritical posts to end. #CantStumpTheTrump #NotEvenASupporter #GetOverIt |
Hillary supporters can't hold all these tears. |
| Seeing people like Lady Gaga, Miley Cyrus and other famous celebrities openly weeping and expressing their sadness.. A Trump victory was so worth it. |
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA You know, it's only because Hillary is female. IF ANOTHER MAN LOST TO TRUMP, DUMB BITCHES WOULDN'T BE BITCHING. I'm a woman. You don't see me having a tantrum because my gender lost an election. This isn't about gender to me at all. I don't support Hillary because she's against all the things I think are best for this country. |
  |
| It's precisely because I learned that women are equal, that I should judge people based on the content of their character, that I realized Hillary was an awful person. |
| Damn. I'm so embarrassed to live here. |
Mkim said: This video is not a response to Trump winning It was out there before the results byt at least months Well that actually makes her attitude even more retarded lol. |
| Rudy Giuliani on fox just now: "I know Trump well"... "he will do all the things he's said he will do". What a time to be alive. |
Thrashinuva said: Rudy Giuliani on fox just now: "I know Trump well"... "he will do all the things he's said he will do". What a time to be alive. Yea right Trump will do some of it, but not all of it like all presidents. |
 |
Noire said: Thrashinuva said: Rudy Giuliani on fox just now: "I know Trump well"... "he will do all the things he's said he will do". What a time to be alive. Yea right Trump will do some of it, but not all of it like all presidents. It's all going to happen. We're going to make America great again, and better than ever before. |
Thrashinuva said: It's all going to happen. We're going to make America great again, and better than ever before. I will ask you what you think of Trump before the midterm elections. |
|
Noire said: Thrashinuva said: It's all going to happen. We're going to make America great again, and better than ever before. I will ask you what you think of Trump before the midterm elections. I look forward to it. |
| Oh really. the truth do not know if that's good or bad lol |
| Seeing how flooded facebook is right now with almost every other person posting their salt about how Trump is a degenerate and hiliary deserved to win, I'm as elated as one could be to show these people to their face. No one read up on the policy and only determines who is a better PERSON to be the president. If that's the case, why don't people just vote for kardashian or something? It's been almost a decade since the last republican president so it'll be pretty refreshing to have someone new. I know I'm probably going to get flamed pretty hard for this, as MAL is apparently pretty liberal, but Obama, imo, sucked a lot, especially with his obama care, amongest many other policies. Anyway, gtg, need to prepare my meme storage and salt container for the next four year |
WHEN IT RAINS, IT POURS. |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
271 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |