Thrashinuva said: mmmm, nope. Maybe if it actually reveals some truth, but I don't have 16 minutes to waste watching a conspiracy theorist. I wouldn't watch a conspiracy theory about Trump, and I won't watch one about Hilary.Pirating_Ninja said: I didn't watch the video And so I'm not going to read this whole post, but... which are by the way not attached to the campaign they are in support of You should watch the video. |
 |
Pirating_Ninja said: mmmm, nope. Maybe if it actually reveals some truth, but I don't have 16 minutes to waste watching a conspiracy theorist. I wouldn't watch a conspiracy theory about Trump, and I won't watch one about Hilary. It's an undercover investigation performed by the uploader of the video... this isn't a theory crafting video. |
| Considering Hilary stole the primaries, and there's proof of voter fraud, it's not exactly a conspiracy to say that she'd steal this election. And you can't really blame Trump supporters, this race has been practically rigged from the beginning. |
╮ (. ❛ ᴗ ❛.) ╭ |
Thrashinuva said: Pirating_Ninja said: mmmm, nope. Maybe if it actually reveals some truth, but I don't have 16 minutes to waste watching a conspiracy theorist. I wouldn't watch a conspiracy theory about Trump, and I won't watch one about Hilary. It's an undercover investigation performed by the uploader of the video... this isn't a theory crafting video. That's nice. Then I'm sure I'll see it on Fox News tonight. |
|
| I don't see Trump as just a "meme candidate". I get that a lot of people are put off by how politically incorrect he is or have other reasons for not liking him, but consider this: Have any of you bothered to read Wikileaks? Literally thousands of emails from the Clinton foundation itself detailing how corrupt Hillary and her campaign is. She literally had Justice Scalia murdered, rigged the Democratic primaries so that Bernie Sanders would lose, and considered drone-striking Assange in an area with heavy population density in a country that's one of our biggest allies. She's literally blaming the leaks on Russian espionage, and antagonizing them into nuclear buildup. The way I see it, whether you like him or not, Trump is our only hope. |
 |
Fuchsia said: The system that controls the primaries is not the same than the one that controls the general election.Considering Hilary stole the primaries, and there's proof of voter fraud, it's not exactly a conspiracy to say that she'd steal this election. And you can't really blame Trump supporters, this race has been practically rigged from the beginning. |
 |
| I'm more interested in the reactions and excuses the Hillary supports will use when she wins and things get even worse. As for me, I'll be lounging by the pool drinking an ice cold glass of I told you so. |
Lost_Viking said: I don't see Trump as just a "meme candidate". I get that a lot of people are put off by how politically incorrect he is or have other reasons for not liking him, but consider this: Have any of you bothered to read Wikileaks? Literally thousands of emails from the Clinton foundation itself detailing how corrupt Hillary and her campaign is. She literally had Justice Scalia murdered, rigged the Democratic primaries so that Bernie Sanders would lose, and considered drone-striking Assange in an area with heavy population density in a country that's one of our biggest allies. She's literally blaming the leaks on Russian espionage, and antagonizing them into nuclear buildup. The way I see it, whether you like him or not, Trump is our only hope. Just because Clinton is bad doesn't mean Trump is good, and vice versa. |
 |
Lost_Viking said: Since when was Krispy Kreme owned by Hilary?She literally had Justice Scalia murdered |
|
I realize that. I'm saying that Clinton is much, much worse. Pirating_Ninja said: Lost_Viking said: Since when was Krispy Kreme owned by Hilary?She literally had Justice Scalia murdered Wikileaks The ranch were his body was found has a pool and a vineyard near it, and "wet works" is often a codephrase used for murdering/assassinating someone. This is just scratching the surface of the Clinton Foundation's crimes, and I'll admit I was skeptical at first myself until I started actually reading the leaks and watching the media actively try to cover up the leaks. |
Lost_VikingOct 17, 2016 6:45 PM
|
| this thread is why some of you should have no business being able to vote all the "HURR WHY VOTE FOR HILARY, SHE IZ EVIL XDDD" "LE HILARY VOTERS SHOULD BE ASHAMED" "LE ACTUALLY VOTING FOR TRUMP XDDDD" if you really cared about hilary not winning, you would vote for a third party, not trump no one in their right mind would vote for drumpf both candidates are unfit to run a fucking city let alone a country, but that's why there's a third party... |
 Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
| "It was rigged! It's a conspiracy, uh, crooked Hillary! And it was the feminists! The feminists voting with their vaginas, they're taking over! First they take over Ghostbusters, and now they're taking over our election! WHITE GENOCIDE!" |
Yomiyuki said: this thread is why some of you should have no business being able to vote all the "HURR WHY VOTE FOR HILARY, SHE IZ EVIL XDDD" "LE HILARY VOTERS SHOULD BE ASHAMED" "LE ACTUALLY VOTING FOR TRUMP XDDDD" if you really cared about hilary not winning, you would vote for a third party, not trump no one in their right mind would vote for drumpf both candidates are unfit to run a fucking city let alone a country, but that's why there's a third party... >Watches SNL >Says others have no business voting |
Altairius said: Yomiyuki said: this thread is why some of you should have no business being able to vote all the "HURR WHY VOTE FOR HILARY, SHE IZ EVIL XDDD" "LE HILARY VOTERS SHOULD BE ASHAMED" "LE ACTUALLY VOTING FOR TRUMP XDDDD" if you really cared about hilary not winning, you would vote for a third party, not trump no one in their right mind would vote for drumpf both candidates are unfit to run a fucking city let alone a country, but that's why there's a third party... >Watches SNL >Says others have no business voting who said anything about watching snl? wtf i haven't seen it since kanye was on in february. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
| It will be a mess regardless of who wins. So far, those who supported Bernie & Hillary were more violent, so I'd expect such a response from them. |
| "Let Justice Be Done!" My Theme Fight again, fight again for justice! |
Yomiyuki said: who said anything about watching snl? wtf i haven't seen it since kanye was on in february. Or rather, John Oliver. Same thing. |
JustALEX said: Sure some could. But, let's be honest: how much violence has there been from them thus far? Much like the TEA Party years ago, there's all this rhetoric about their supposed violent tendencies, but very few actual events that validate the rhetoric. Frankly, there will most likely be more Bernie/Hillary supporters committing violence regardless of who wins. Why? Just look at where the violence has been this season.This leads me to believe that SOME Trump supporters could get ugly if and when Trump loses....because they've been told over and over by Trump that the election is going to be rigged. I personally hope it doesn't get too bad....but we'll see on Nov. 8 |
Pirating_Ninja said: Thrashinuva said: It's an undercover investigation performed by the uploader of the video... this isn't a theory crafting video. That's nice. Then I'm sure I'll see it on Fox News tonight. Hopefully you'll see it tomorrow after part 2, but perhaps not. Hannity covered it on his radio show http://www.hannity.com/articles/election-493995/undercover-video-democrats-admit-to-inciting-15209763/, and Neil Cavuto, with his correspondent Pat Caddell, stated that mainstream media should be covering it. This is what aired today on his show, with the proper timestamp placing you when he brings in Pat. They talk about screwy polling and overall rigging of the election, and Pay brings it up towards the end of their discussion. https://youtu.be/Av0NACuSXpA?t=19m28s This video (it's only 1:32 long for goodness sake), is the creator of the video and he states why he feels cable news is not covering it. Edit: Oh maybe they actually did cover it. Either way, Scott Foval got fired.  Edit 2: Hannity covered it. |
ThrashinuvaOct 17, 2016 8:56 PM
Altairius said: Yomiyuki said: who said anything about watching snl? wtf i haven't seen it since kanye was on in february. Or rather, John Oliver. Same thing. no, i dont watch john oliver either |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
That's good. That's where "Drumpf" comes from though. |
Thrashinuva said: I see a conspiracy theorist begging for clicks because Mainstream media doesn't want to touch a story that could very well be false, and result in a civil lawsuit against them which (unlike some random conspiracy theorist) would result in paying out of the ass for claimed damages that could be much more severe if the (presumably) libel were to have been aired on national television without any type of fact checking.Hopefully you'll see it tomorrow after part 2, but perhaps not. Hannity covered it on his radio show http://www.hannity.com/articles/election-493995/undercover-video-democrats-admit-to-inciting-15209763/, and Neil Cavuto, with his correspondent Pat Caddell, stated that mainstream media should be covering it. This is what aired today on his show, with the proper timestamp placing you when he brings in Pat. They talk about screwy polling and overall rigging of the election, and Pay brings it up towards the end of their discussion. https://youtu.be/Av0NACuSXpA?t=19m28s This video (it's only 1:32 long for goodness sake), is the creator of the video and he states why he feels cable news is not covering it. Edit: Oh maybe they actually did cover it. Either way, Scott Foval got fired. https://i.redd.it/0snrw51x75sx.jpg The main reason why mainstream media avoids conspiracy theorists (with any political agenda) is because they typically have mental problems, in which they have paranoid delusions and will go out of their way to connect dots that aren't there. For every true conspiracy theory, there are a million false ones, and anyone could tell you that sticking your neck out for that 1 in a million chance is stupid. (He could be right, however if he is, then eventually mainstream media will absolutely publish it. Money > Political Agenda, and a big story = $$$) Now, sometimes they don't have to fear having a case taken against them, so they will go ahead and do it (after all libel lawsuits take quite a bit), Clinton, or the DNC backed by numerous large corporations would very likely be willing to fight such a lawsuit, leaving the cable station that negligently reported false information out millions in legal fees and the eventual payout. |
|
| @Pirating_Ninja I've further edited my post. I thought you hadn't seen it yet. Fox News has already covered it, the other new organizations will be forced to cover it, hopefully before the debate. |
Thrashinuva said: Promising . . . Although notice the words he is using to deflect any legal responsibility - "appears to show", or that Fox News could not independently verify any of the information. It's a tad bit more credible, but I'll wait. If it's true, more than just Breitbart will embrace it.@Pirating_Ninja I've further edited my post. I thought you hadn't seen it yet. Fox News has already covered it, the other new organizations will be forced to cover it, hopefully before the debate. |
|
Pirating_Ninja said: Thrashinuva said: Promising . . . Although notice the words he is using to deflect any legal responsibility - "appears to show", or that Fox News could not independently verify any of the information. It's a tad bit more credible, but I'll wait. If it's true, more than just Breitbart will embrace it.@Pirating_Ninja I've further edited my post. I thought you hadn't seen it yet. Fox News has already covered it, the other new organizations will be forced to cover it, hopefully before the debate. Another note, the only thing in this video that really lends credence to your concerns is that it is not strictly raw footage. It is cut, but it still mostly consists of hidden camera footage of these people admitting to these crimes, and in one instance even a felony (at least if that super pac thing is a felony). You could make the case that it was edited unfairly, but if you really view it, you'll find that an extremely hard case to make. |
Thrashinuva said: Pirating_Ninja said: Promising . . . Although notice the words he is using to deflect any legal responsibility - "appears to show", or that Fox News could not independently verify any of the information. It's a tad bit more credible, but I'll wait. If it's true, more than just Breitbart will embrace it. Another note, the only thing in this video that really lends credence to your concerns is that it is not strictly raw footage. It is cut, but it still mostly consists of hidden camera footage of these people admitting to these crimes, and in one instance even a felony (at least if that super pac thing is a felony). You could make the case that it was edited unfairly, but if you really view it, you'll find that an extremely hard case to make. That's O'Keefe's MO. Deceptively edited videos that are debunked every time. I haven't watched it so I don't know what he's claiming this time, but I'd take it with a truckload of salt. And anyway Hillary and the DNC have enough skeletons in her closet (probably literally) that I'd rather learn from a more reliable source like Wikileaks. |
|
| How stupid does Trump look when even top members of the GOP refuse to go with his rigged election narrative? https://www.yahoo.com/gma/rubio-dismisses-trump-claims-rigged-election-032804070--abc-news-topstories.html I mean my god....A lot of Trump supporters say they are anti-SJW and what not, but here they are playing the VICTIM with absolutely no hard evidence. I mean for fucks sake, we haven't even voted yet! Why does he keep saying it's going to be rigged?!! So he can have a bullshit reason to explain his humiliating defeat perhaps? Oh and NO...I'm not going to take some highly edited video from a proved FRAUD like O'Keefe as evidence. That motherfucker has cried wolf in the past and has been exposed for being a liar.....that's what happens when you constantly lie....people don't fucking believe your ass! |
JustALEX said: I mean for fucks sake, we haven't even voted yet! Why does he keep saying it's going to be rigged?!! Well the primary proved that Hillary and the DNC will go to pretty much any lengths to win. |
|
Narmy said: JustALEX said: I mean for fucks sake, we haven't even voted yet! Why does he keep saying it's going to be rigged?!! Well the primary proved that Hillary and the DNC will go to pretty much any lengths to win. But, is there ANY evidence they literally rigged all those votes from all those states to allow her to defeat Bernie? If there is...then I'm all ears. Also....just how many people were in on it? How exactly do you rig an election when literally every single state....no, let me rephrase that....EVERY SINGLE COUNTY on this country has their own formats? This would make the 9/11 "inside job" bullshit look like child's play. |
JustALEX said: Narmy said: Well the primary proved that Hillary and the DNC will go to pretty much any lengths to win. But, is there ANY evidence they literally rigged all those votes from all those states to allow her to defeat Bernie? If there is...then I'm all ears. Also....just how many people were in on it? How exactly do you rig an election when literally every single state....no, let me rephrase that....EVERY SINGLE COUNTY on this country has their own formats? This would make the 9/11 "inside job" bullshit look like child's play. There are other dirty ways of tipping the scales in your favor without physically rigging the votes. Purging the voter rolls (along with mysteriously changed voter registrations in closed primary states), using your influence in the media to give the voters the wrong perspective (like adding superdelegates without disclosure), disrupting polling places (Bill Clinton did this multiple times), the DNC coordinating with the Clinton camp even though they are supposed to be neutral, etc. Just check out the Wikileaks stuff to see just how dirty the primary was. |
|
| Basically.....what Trump and some of his supporters want us to believe is that we are witnessing the GREATEST conspiracy of ALL TIME. We are through the looking glass people... See, as a skeptic, conspiracy theories are things I will NEVER take on face value. It's one thing to say that there is a bias in the media....no shit there is bias! It's another thing to say that we literally have voter fraud and possible tinkering with votes. That is NOT easy to do in a country where every single county has different formats and officials from various political positions in place to make sure that such fraud do not occur. NO, NO, NO! The polls do NOT say there is a conspiracy. They say that while both candidates are indeed very much disliked....Hillary is currently winning the crucial swing states that will grant her the 270 electoral votes needed to be come President. @Non-American MALers....I sincerely HOPE you understand that unlike other countries that simply have a popular vote to decide who wins an election....the United States does not function that way. We have the "Electoral College"....and as such you need to acquire 270 electoral votes to win the Presidency. Currently, according to all the major polls, Hillary is winning in the battleground states of Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Virginia..... I mean look...let me paint you a more clearer picture... Hillary could LOSE Florida, Ohio, AND North Carolina and STILL win! Right now the popular Fivethirtyeight.com prediction website has Hillary winning the election with 346 electoral votes!! Remember you only need 270 to win...she's 76 electoral votes ahead of the minimum needed! Sorry, but when it comes to this stuff....I air on the side of what the Polls say....not insane conspiracy theories. |
| ^ Either you actually look into Wikileaks or keep taking all your opinions from Sam Harris. Up to you. I'm betting he's conspicuously silent on all of this. |
Altairius said: ^ Either you actually look into Wikileaks or keep taking all your opinions from Sam Harris. Up to you. I'm betting he's conspicuously silent on all of this. None of the Wikileaks show that there is literal voter fraud going on. Furthermore, we are talking about the general election. There isn't one poll showing Hillary winning...there are MANY polls showing Hillary winning. Here...check this out: http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/national-polls/ ^Here are the Top 10 polls in the country....ALL of them have Hillary in the lead. Including Fox News....which usually has a Republican lean. And here is the Election forecast predictor: http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/ ^Do you see what I see? A website, which is famous for having good predictions is giving Hillary an 88% chance of winning with 20 days left to go. Now...in those 20 days, things can surely change....but can Trump make up this huge deficit he's gotten into? |
| @JustALEX There is undoubtedly voter fraud. They stole it from Sanders, but we're talking about polling. Mainstream media is almost uniformly oversampling Democrats, and I've heard that the actual polls of CNN and the like show Trump winning by far, and they're putting out fake ones. I don't know if that's confirmed though. |
RedRoseFring said: It will be a mess regardless of who wins. So far, those who supported Bernie & Hillary were more violent, so I'd expect such a response from them. That's just your personal observation. You don't have any stats or really any proof at all to back up your claim. |
| I'm more worried about what people would do if Trump won lol. I feel like the far left liberals and the liberal media will do some very cringe worthy things if Trump wins the election. |
astrozombie84 said: RedRoseFring said: It will be a mess regardless of who wins. So far, those who supported Bernie & Hillary were more violent, so I'd expect such a response from them. That's just your personal observation. You don't have any stats or really any proof at all to back up your claim. It's pretty well known, though the media tries to paint the opposite picture as usual. Check out the anti-Trump protests in Southern California. Wikileaks even revealed people in the Clinton campaign paying people to start shit at Trump rallies, and even with that we see next to no violent Trump supporters. |
Narmy said: Thrashinuva said: Another note, the only thing in this video that really lends credence to your concerns is that it is not strictly raw footage. It is cut, but it still mostly consists of hidden camera footage of these people admitting to these crimes, and in one instance even a felony (at least if that super pac thing is a felony). You could make the case that it was edited unfairly, but if you really view it, you'll find that an extremely hard case to make. That's O'Keefe's MO. Deceptively edited videos that are debunked every time. I haven't watched it so I don't know what he's claiming this time, but I'd take it with a truckload of salt. There's a bit too much footage to take that stance seriously. Is it biased, dramaticized, and maybe even a little unfair? Yes. Did they commit the crimes they said they did? Also yes. Don't tell me you feel that this footage is invalid but TrumpTapes are valid? Oh I forget you haven't fucking watched it so you have no idea what's in it. |
| If Trump wasn't so stupid and disgusting, he could have easily won. For awhile, he was either tied or ahead of Clinton in the polls. After his shitty performance at the first debate, which he clearly didn't adequately prepare for, and the release of the video of him boasting about sexually assaulting women, his chances were killed. The only person to blame for his failures is himself. |
| I suspect if Trump loses the only thing that will happen is that the "Impeach Obama NOW!/Fuck you Obama!" posts will change to saying Hillary. There won't be a civil war or uprising or anything like that no matter who wins and who's butthurt over it. |
| Most likely to result in more adolescent rants about conspiracy and political correctness and all that jazz. Also about how Trump is a good candidate because of how bad Hillary is. Not that either are good, mind you. |
| Theory: Trump won in an alternate timeline. Democrat time travelers from the future are rigging the election. |
CatSoulOct 18, 2016 6:58 AM
| "No, son, you may not have your body pillow at the dinner table!" |
| Well if you are just looking forward to the butthurt produced from these election results, you might as well hope hillary loses instead. Although the amount of butthurt produced from trump losing would be great, it would be nothing compared to the amount of butthurt if hillary loses, because not only would fringe extremists be angry, so would the mainstream media and by extension random voters all across the country. The only problem is that this butthurt might intensify so much that it causes riots. |
| well this kind of bullshit was clearly going to happen when the usa population though having such a brilliant respected person as candidate for the president of united states |
| They will probably kill themselfs, Would not bother me if they did tbh |
 |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
272 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |