| When it comes to a body count I am in the position where I cannot judge another person for having a high body count. And I don't like shaming those with low to no body count either. I am either really kind or just have no standards anymore, I dunno. |
  ♡ Harder Daddy ♡ |
| Anything less than three and I know they're not an experienced assassin. *ba dum tsh* |
 |
| Sheer numbers don't really tell you about a person's motivations and viewpoints very well alone. And when did this start getting called a "body count"? |
| Yeah body count matters. Hitler is overrated compared to Mao. All he did was kill some birds to get that body count. |
| Die like you did by the lake on Naboo. |
| Well couldn't you tell it literally instead of using slang which has at least 2 meanings? Body count as for killing -> over 1 is too much I ain't going out with murderers/killers (exceptions are kills made for self-protect or during the war as a soldier). For sex -> Yall still believe that less means better? I don't care about body count in this meaning, the more experience the better the girl is that's it. |
| My body count is in the twenties (I am a serial killer) |
 |
| We can't be absolutely sure. A high body count may not be high if everybody else in your region has a high body count. Unfortunately, most beautiful women are sluttish and if you aspire to not waking up beside a face so ugly you can barely see, then you have to be content with a high body count that is somewhat low in comparison. However, the absolute number is still a sign that they're not faithful and so the best course of action is fck and dump. You don't want to be a lifeline to a whore. There is a misconception that a low body count is a safe bet. Actually, it just shows the lack of suitors either because the women have plain/ugly looks or they have some character flaws. The lack of attention they get coupled with the inner jealousy that is inherent in every woman makes them cling to whatever is available. But they need so much maintenance that they essentially become a time drain. Nevertheless, don't settle for less. Ideally, everybody should aim for women who are beautiful, nice, and virgins but unfortunately they're almost impossible to find nowadays. |
| Don't know what I want, but I know how to get it |
| Yeah, I think body count matters. I'm old enough to understand that the women I meet are most likely not virgins. That being said, if I know several different guys that have had sex with the same girl I'm automatically not interested. Also, I find it very unattractive when I hear about women who get trains run on them. I don't judge them because they can live how they want. But in the same regard, I would never consider those kinds of women for marriage or even dating. I'd probably lie awake at night imagining my girl taking one in the pink and in the kisser at the same time. You can call me insecure but I know I deserve better than that. |
 |
| What I'm usually worried the most is STDs, so having a low or average body count is an automatic plus, but I think it also depends on the person. For example, if I know they often get drunk and do reckless stuff with random people without remembering what happened when they wake up the next morning, it is an automatic red flag for me. On the other hand, if they are being really careful and take care of their health, then I wouldn't care much if they've been with a hundred people before me. Some girls just wanna have fun, I guess. |
| Could we just ban fercei's IP already ? All those fucking topics are about the same shaming nonsense... |
 |
| Love come first but I also think there's a higher risk of deception with starting a relation with a high body count, those who might get weary for example So less body count would be better |
  たのむ |
| if you have not hit at least 10 people with your car I'm not really interested in talking to you |
infinite money glitch click here for money free mony click here real |
| Oh! This is about sex partners, I thought you talking about something else, I almost dry snitched on myself haha....😅 |
   |
| The older I get the more stupid these things sound to me ngl. |
 Leading biologist Scott Pitnick said: The bigger your 'nads, the smaller your brains |
| Yeah it's all good, thinking about raking up a couple more kills tonight. Been practicing headshots recently! |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Wavey_Nooby said: does this apply to you as well ? do they deserve better than you in relation to how many you've been with ? or are you a celibate good boy ?Yeah, I think body count matters. I'm old enough to understand that the women I meet are most likely not virgins. That being said, if I know several different guys that have had sex with the same girl I'm automatically not interested. Also, I find it very unattractive when I hear about women who get trains run on them. I don't judge them because they can live how they want. But in the same regard, I would never consider those kinds of women for marriage or even dating. I'd probably lie awake at night imagining my girl taking one in the pink and in the kisser at the same time. You can call me insecure but I know I deserve better than that. |
"It is our choices, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities" - HP1 forever fave quote //This was quoted in the year of 2009 |
| Body count does not really matter to me since I plan to stay a virgin for life, and not marry anyone. Obviously higher body counts correlate to greater chance of divorce/cheating though so it is something people should be aware of. I would not recommend marriage to any guy, but best of luck no matter what you do. Polygamy is the natural mating process of humans so monogamy almost always fails. |
 |
| body count? is this about being a serial killer or sex enjoyer |
| I don't really think how battered she's been, as far as she looks ok and good to go (no STDs) then we go. As for a more meaningful relationship, it does, and if I come to the conclusion that I want to settle up I would look for a virgin. One issue is that most women do not know after the 4th or 5th man they have certain elements in the body that change and after that the need to bond is gone. They can be in love and may end up staying, but the chances of that are low. The research is there. |
''Enemies' gifts are no gifts and do no good.'' |
| A too high number (>50) is off-putting to me |
| I have over 100 body count, police here doesn't do shit lol |
 こんにちは はじめまして さようなら またあした @suenagaharuto |
| I have no interest in dating hoes and thots. Secondhand goods are never going to be as good and valuable compared to brand new. |
Amebix said: As a virgin it would probably be best for me to date another virgin, should I end up dating anyone. Ideally my first time would be her first time, and the relationship would be as special to her as it is to me. You're generally going to be more attached to the 1st person you date, kiss, have sex with, etc. than to any subsequent people you do those things with. As an old geezer with some stories to tell already, I can assure you this : It's better to start with someone who knows what they're doing. You'll probably be lost the first time (as we often are), and it's reassuring to have a partner with experience you can rely on. My 2 old cents, do what you want anyways, and enjoy yourself ;) |
|
pizazz said: We can't be absolutely sure. A high body count may not be high if everybody else in your region has a high body count. Unfortunately, most beautiful women are sluttish and if you aspire to not waking up beside a face so ugly you can barely see, then you have to be content with a high body count that is somewhat low in comparison. However, the absolute number is still a sign that they're not faithful and so the best course of action is fck and dump. You don't want to be a lifeline to a whore. There is a misconception that a low body count is a safe bet. Actually, it just shows the lack of suitors either because the women have plain/ugly looks or they have some character flaws. The lack of attention they get coupled with the inner jealousy that is inherent in every woman makes them cling to whatever is available. But they need so much maintenance that they essentially become a time drain. Nevertheless, don't settle for less. Ideally, everybody should aim for women who are beautiful, nice, and virgins but unfortunately they're almost impossible to find nowadays. Well, you basically described me. I am pretty ugly and I cling to any man to shows me attention because I'm very lonely. I'm sorry I can't change my face. |
| It's funny cause women are shamed for sleeping with multiple men, but men aren't for sleeping with multiple women. Personally it's none of my business who does what with who, but I'm the kind of person that has to be in a relationship to sleep with a man. |
“You flounder through life, struggling desperately so you won't drown, even though you would float if you'd just relax.” |
| If that body count doesn't include Tom Selleck they just have shite taste honestly. Why would anyone settle for less? |
 |
| Body count? Although people made this joke many times, I cannot help but thinking about some gruesome statistics... Amebix said: Moonspeak said: It's better to start with someone who knows what they're doing. You'll probably be lost the first time (as we often are), and it's reassuring to have a partner with experience you can rely on. Why is that important? Couldn't you just figure things out as you go along? My main concerns with dating someone more experienced than me are as follows: -They may judge me more since they have prior experience to compare me against. -I may end up more attached to them than they are to me. Who are you usually going to be more attached to, the first person you kiss/date/have sex with, or the 13th person you've done those things with? I worry that I'd be seen as just another significant other/fuckbuddy in their eyes. If you find someone who actually cares about you, you should not be afraid to be "judged" by them... Since you are young, you should not care so much about the "stigma." The second point that you are making is ridiculously theoretical and bizarre, I hope that you realise it. First, how would it be an issue that you get more attached to the person than they are to you? You cannot expect a perfect symmetry, and it seems to me that this "repartition" is the most favourable to you... Secondly, you will indeed most likely be "just" another SO to this person, and this is normal. I wonder what this new entitlement is about... You should not be expecting to be the best person that your partner has met in their life. The important thing is that they would be willing to be with you right now. |
Stargazingx said: It's funny cause women are shamed for sleeping with multiple men, but men aren't for sleeping with multiple women. Personally it's none of my business who does what with who, but I'm the kind of person that has to be in a relationship to sleep with a man. I agree! It's ironic that guys want virgins but they sleep with girls who aren't virgins. |
Dostojevskij said: This applies to me as well. If I expect my woman to respect her body then I will do the same. I've never been one to sleep around. When we first started dating I told my girlfriend about all of my previous relationships/sexual encounters. I gave her the opportunity then and there to either accept that or move on. I didn't wait months down the line for her to find out about my ex gfs. She also told me about her history and I was honestly surprised at how reserved she was considering how people just fuck anyone and anything these days. I find it much more attractive when a woman hasn't shared herself with an entire community.Wavey_Nooby said: does this apply to you as well ? do they deserve better than you in relation to how many you've been with ? or are you a celibate good boy ?Yeah, I think body count matters. I'm old enough to understand that the women I meet are most likely not virgins. That being said, if I know several different guys that have had sex with the same girl I'm automatically not interested. Also, I find it very unattractive when I hear about women who get trains run on them. I don't judge them because they can live how they want. But in the same regard, I would never consider those kinds of women for marriage or even dating. I'd probably lie awake at night imagining my girl taking one in the pink and in the kisser at the same time. You can call me insecure but I know I deserve better than that. |
|
| I said it the last time this was touched on and I'll say it again: It's about their level of commitment to a relationship what their goal is when being in a relationship. I don't judge people who just want wanna fuck around, but I need sustainability these days, and sometimes the journey is more interesting than the destination. |
 |
| Means she will probably leave you in short time. Then again, hardly any of them want real relationships anymore. If they did, they wouldn't keep aiming for the top 5 to 10 percent of men, who get so much action that they don't want to settle down. |
| Yes body count matters, the likely hood of them ditching you within are year is high the more they have |
 |
| @Amebix It's not important no... I'm just saying you may have a better time doing so. Look, the first time will probably be the shittiest, that's just how it is. I was so fucking stressed I couldn't even come, and I know I wasn't the only guy feeling that way for my first time. Felt horrible, so mentally blocked that I did not have any pleasure at all. Sure was glad to do it with someone that was experienced, she was really patient and kind about it, told me that stuff could happen etc. With her attitude, I slowly started to worry less, and it actually ended up going well. You may have some ideas about how you feel about sex, but being confronted to the real thing is really different. Having some guidance about how your body works, deconstructing the porn clichés, not hurting yourself... That shit matters, and we're in desperate need of a better education about sexuality in general in my opinion. Also, your first partner is rarely the last, so don't make that big of a deal of the relationship you're having with them. I wasn't in love with the girl I first slept with (and neither was she, even if we did have a great complicity), and that's something you realize when you have a better notion of what love actually feels like, and that comes with experiences, with time. All in all, my advice is : Relax, don't be judgemental, and enjoy the time you're having with whoever shares your desires. |
MoonspeakApr 30, 2022 12:03 AM
|
| In principle, body count doesn't matter that much, but you just gotta be careful about STDs and all that. |
"Molly Ringwald" out right now - check my Linktree!  |
| Body count DOES matter because it tells you if the person is a degenerate or not. If a women only does sexxual stuff with a man who is her boyfriend, then her body count will be low. On the other hand, if a women has been known to do sexxual stuff with men who are not her boyfriend, then you can bet that her body count is from 10-100. Last thing you want is to make a women your girlfriend when she has a history of being loose, because it then means that she is making you work for sexxual stuff while she has a history of giving those sexxual stuff to other men for free. Again, body count DOES MATTER, because it tells you who is a degenerate and who is not. Stargazingx said: It's funny cause women are shamed for sleeping with multiple men, but men aren't for sleeping with multiple women. Personally it's none of my business who does what with who, but I'm the kind of person that has to be in a relationship to sleep with a man. The reason why men are not shamed for sleeping with multiple women is because trying to get a women is a very difficult thing for a men (too much competition, and women are very picky since they have low testosterone). So if a men has a reputation of a player, then that means that he is achieving something that is considered difficult. And achieving success in a difficult area is impressive. On the other hand, a women can get a guy any time she wants. I mean, because guys have tons of testosterone and always crave women, the women would have to be EXTREMELY UGLY in order for a guy to reject her (whether its for a relationship, or friends-with-benefits, or a one-night-stand). Thats why there is nothing impressive about a women having a high body count. And achieving success in a very easy area is not impressive. |
oooo3333Apr 30, 2022 2:23 AM
Amebix said: Do you think that someone with less experience would be less patient? No, but they'd be just as lost as you, and that's not ideal when you need comfort and guidance. Amebix said: it seems that most of that could be learned from reading or talking to people with more experience than you rather than from having sex with someone more experienced than you. That couldn't be further from reality. Talking about sex is great, but it doesn't come close as doing the real thing. You can't truly understand something you've never experienced. Amebix said: I am curious as to what changes you thinks should be made to sex ed. A lot apparently, when I read about some of the ignorant shit online, like in this thread... Stressing the fact that it is a normal, natural act, it's rarely about reproduction but rather pleasure (as it is in lots of other animal species), good for your health, that consent is not optional, recognizing what constitutes an absence of consent or not, stress out the fact that it should not be about expecting something from your partner but rather giving, listening to each other, learning about men and women bodies a lot more so you won't hurt each other and properly locate a clit for once, that violence doesn't hold a candle to tenderness to spark desire, the importance of contraception, of abortion rights for women, etc... I could go on and on for longer, but you get the picture. There is a lot we can do to educate people about the subject, and what's fucking any progress we may do in that direction is hugely due to pointless puritanism (like the idiots ranting about body counts here). I would also talk about the subject before your adolescence, and I know that's a touchy suject for a lot of those holy morons. Amebix said: isn't your first relationship usually the one that has the biggest impact on you? You know, like the old saying "You never forget your first love". No. At least, not for me (and a lot of others), I can barely remember the name of the first girl I was talking about, let alone her features. On the other hand, I have the fondest memories of the ex I was with just a couple of months ago, and the fact that we both had other partners before didn't diminish the desire and love we had for each other. If anything, it actually strenghtens it, because it means that it has value among the other experiences we lived. We know that we feel something that we didn't feel for the others. Amebix said: I don't think I'd want my first time to be with someone I'm not in a relationship with. Wouldn't sex feel better/more intense/more emotional/whatever if it's with someone you're in love with? If that's your desire, feel free to do it your way ;) Yes, a partner you have an emotional attachement to often feels great, but so do a lot of different kinds of situations. I wouldn't go for the most intense one at first, you need to be relaxed about it, not feeling like it's your "one in a lifetime" thing. Just don't put too much pressure on yourself or on your partner, sex is not some great mysterious thing, it's just a pleasure of everyday life, not that different from other kinds. So, the more casual you go about it at first, the better ;) |
|
| Fun fact guys, you wanna know why your penis is shaped the way it is? Like how the tip is shaped and all that at the front or top of it? It's because it's supposed to act like a plunger and yank out all the other guys semen from their pussy so the baby is yours. Evolution actually makes it so a woman can fuck 10,000 guys at the same time and you get to be the dad. How many guys a woman fucks actually doesn't matter. Thanks Evolution. |
| Die like you did by the lake on Naboo. |
| [quote=traed message=66258547] And when did this start getting called a "body count"? you must be old!!? XD jk <3 i always heard it being referred to as that, maybe its just more common in urban areas/younger generations?  |
remember the lesson, not the disappointment. |
| body count is always a tricky subject to engage in ... of couse you shouldn't judge your partner on their past ,,, but you always shouldn't accept if they run the streets while currently with you and as someone else posted .. your girl making a porno with a guy is yay or nay (everyone is different) but your girl getting a train ran on her screams red flags that would hinder you if you choose to ignore |
 |
| Yes it does. 1-2 is fine imo ( a girl in her mid 20's since I'm 25 myself ), but once you get to 3 and especially more than 3, then either she's a slut/too loose , or something is seriously wrong with her emotionally. |
 |
| I don't care if she smashed but if she got the train, shes for the streets. |
Amebix said: Surely you could do that by doing a little research, right? No. We are not talking about learning some math lesson here, we're talking about understanding your own body, and your own pleasure. You can't do just theorical learning, this is something that you get from experience. Amebix said: how long before adolescence are we talking? 12? 10? 5? Like, teaching someone who's on the brink of puberty about sex makes sense, but teaching them earlier seems a little odd. Also, what kind of sex ed are we talking about? Are we just talking about how babies are made, or are we talking about contraception and consent and shit? I remember my mom first taught me about sex when I was 8, but it was a very "sterile" sort of education. I asked her how babies were made, so she got me a kids' anatomy book and explained how this goes in there that causes babies pop out. However, she did not explain that people did that activity for pleasure or anything about contraceptives or consent or whatever. It took me awhile to figure out that the activity was pleasurable for people. Also, I don't think she ever even used the word "sex" when explaining things. See, this is what I'm talking about. There is a huge gap to mentally cross before we're in a sane state of mind regarding sex education. I'll show you a bit of what seperates my culture from yours. Not that long ago, we had a hugely popular comicstrip author, Zep, who made an educative comic about sexuality, aimed towards children. This was called "Le guide du zizi sexuel", here's the updated version :  This was great material, and touched on many on the subjects I was talking about in a smart manner. Not perfect, but it was a step in the right direction. There's also other more complete ones dedicated for young adults, who often also lack the basis. I believe you should be able to teach that to children even at a young age, without any kind of taboo. Make it something normal and harmless, like eating or going to the beach. Don't make it super akward and sit them down with a serious face to have "the talk", to never speak of the matter afterwards. Just make it a subject you can freely talk about, and guide them when they're starting to get more curious. Make it fun ^^ By the age of ten, more than one in five kid has already watched porn in some way or another, so we need to demystify what they are seeing. The american porn codes (your usual "almost automatic blowjob followed by penetration and pointless repeated slaps on the ass while making retarded noises that try to emulate what pleasure feels like") are a real pain in the ass, and so widespread now in the actual sexuality than it's just becoming boring for everyone. Here's a hint guys : when you're having sex this way, women get bored out of their minds 9 times out of 10, and just simulate to get it over with. Here's another hint : take your time, don't rush the preliminaries, and you will both have a better time and end up using a lot less lube. Also, sex isn't about penetration only, you have no idea how many of your partners prefer that you gently fondle their clit or other erogenous parts (which can differ greatly between individuals), that gets them going way higher than your stupid dick. I won't go in a rant, but there's sooooo much to talk about... Anyways. Amebix said: At any rate, I am probably wasting my time taking about all this anyways, since I am not going to have sex or be in a relationship any time in the foreseeable future. Truth is, you never know ;) I wasn't expecting my first time to happen the way it did, it's not something you can really plan out. It's a lot about random chance, really. Not only, but don't underestimate this factor. Let yourself open to possibilities, and don't expect anything, just go with the flow ;) |
|
| LET THE BODIES HIT THE FLOOOOOR jajajaja :J |
| I CELEBRATE myself, And what I assume you shall assume, For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you. |
More topics from this board
» UEFA Euro 2024 - General Discussiondazedcowcow62 - 9 minutes ago |
2 |
by Zarutaku
»»
2 minutes ago |
|
» 2023-2024 NBA Season Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )deg - Jun 18, 2023 |
862 |
by dazedcowcow62
»»
21 minutes ago |
|
» Biggest life hot takes? ( 1 2 3 )Rabnawaz2 - Jun 15 |
127 |
by DigiCat
»»
31 minutes ago |
|
» What type of physical affection do you crave/Fantasize the most about?Thy-Veseveia - Jun 16 |
17 |
by Zarutaku
»»
1 hour ago |
|
» What Compliment Do You Hear Most Often?ParisPlayboy01 - 10 hours ago |
17 |
by Zarutaku
»»
1 hour ago |