| Yes, and it's you OP. You make me moister than an oyster. Edit 11/5/19: Well, since everyone else seems to be replying in earnest... Yeah, kinda. She's kind of a nerd/weeb like me and we've had a couple of painting classes together. But she's unfortunately very soft-spoken to the point where I literally can't hear her most of the time due to blowing out my eardrums with metal since 2006. That, and there's an age gap. I imagine that she's in her early to mid 20's while I'm pushing 30, so there's a point where talking to her, even with platonic intent, feels like I'm subconsciously trying to lure her into a windless white van that reads "Free candy" on one of the sides. But the people the I've known that are closer to my age are asshole millennials, so, maybe hookin' up with Gen Z wouldn't be too bad of an option at this point. My rule-of-thumb age (divide your age by 2 then add 7) is 21 after all. |
FacelessVixenNov 5, 2019 2:40 PM
 |
| Yes, I have, on multiple users of the forums, I won't go into names so no one gets jealous since I'm quite popular and desirable, but unlike the one above me, you're not one of them, sorry, OP. |
 |
| I can't get close because i lost the basement key |
Kosmonaut said: I am one of them and everyone else who's after my popular and desirable Kosmonaut needs to back off before I massage your face with a belt sander.Yes, I have, on multiple users of the forums, I won't go into names so no one gets jealous since I'm quite popular and desirable, but unlike the one above me, you're not one of them, sorry, OP. |
 hiSets Last FM Anime List Manga List Clue no. 2: Somewhere in one of the pictures in my forum signature. |
| No, I'm a nihilistic porcupine who suffers from the porcupine dilemma. If I get too close to someone I prick them or get pricked. However if I have no one I feel cold so the best solution is by remaining at a little distance from one another. That way I don't get pricked but I also don't freeze to death. |
<Insert clever quote> |
-InfiniteLoop- said: No, I'm a nihilistic porcupine who suffers from the porcupine dilemma. If I get too close to someone I prick them or get pricked. However if I have no one I feel cold so the best solution is by remaining at a little distance from one another. That way I don't get pricked but I also don't freeze to death. For some reason, this reminded me of Koyomi Araragi from Monogatari and how he used to avoid making friends because he felt it basically made him lose part of himself. It's too bad you didn't see the Kizumonogatari movie trilogy (which I think is considerably better than most of the anime series)...but wow, we have quite a few favorites in common. Anyway, I think if you really want to be close to someone, you have to be willing to get hurt. |
 |
| I read the title as "Do you have a crush or romance internet right now?" It's true that I want polyamory with people who are from MAL and other sites. |
 |
Cookies said: Accept being part of my harem and things will work out. There's no need for jealousy, there's enough of me for everyone to enjoy. Kosmonaut said: I am one of them and everyone else who's after my popular and desirable Kosmonaut needs to back off before I massage your face with a belt sander.Yes, I have, on multiple users of the forums, I won't go into names so no one gets jealous since I'm quite popular and desirable, but unlike the one above me, you're not one of them, sorry, OP. |
|
| Yeah, so many romantic interests. I actually have a reverse harem. They're all really nice guys. Too bad they're 2D :'D |
| yeah, his name is p0ckyy wow he is so hot |
| Nah, not really. I'm getting over my last romantic interest to be honest. |
| pretty scared of commitment honestly, made my last two relationships pretty rocky because of that :// but no! i am no longer lonely! for recently...i have discovered... O T O M E G A M E S |
 |
fancyjasper said: Yeah, so many romantic interests. I actually have a reverse harem. They're all really nice guys. Too bad they're 2D :'D  character count my ass, why does this rule exist |
| I wouldn't go that far, though I've kinda been flirting around a bit with this one girl lately who seems promising and showed some interest herself so we'll see if that leads anywhere |
  |
| Yes, but I'm listening to Just Another Girl by the Killers as I type this so I'm legally obligated to do absolutely nothing about it. Kickass song though. |
| ye and usually temporary only and as always i do not do anything about it since im not even husbando material lol maybe in another world (isekai) |
| Yes, she's engaged to me. Guys I think she likes me. |
 |
| Not for any real person, that's for sure. |
 |
| Contrary to the popular belief of how people portray me on this site I am far from being a person void of emotion. I wish to say that I'm in love or something of the sort as a way to back my saying but "unfortunately" I'm not. |
  “The most shameless thing in the world is political power that can be inherited regardless of ability or talent!” |
| Not really, I failed miserably a while ago because I was too slow and there were too many hindrances in the way so I guess it's time to move on. Having a crush while already being in a relationship isn't an easy thing to begin with. |
| Not at the moment but would love to date other weebs in my area if i see any |
Kosmonaut said: How could I ever get jealous when all the others have such bourgeois hair and aren't even part of the Nihon-Siki master race?Yes, I have, on multiple users of the forums, I won't go into names so no one gets jealous since I'm quite popular and desirable, but unlike the one above me, you're not one of them, sorry, OP. |
 It is obvious that "obscenity" is not a term capable of exact legal definition; in the practice of the courts, it means "anything that shocks the magistrate". — Bertrand Russell |
Sphinxter said: Yes indeed, you're the best one because you don't succumb to bourgeois feelings such as jealousy. Kosmonaut said: How could I ever get jealous when all the others have such bourgeois hair and aren't even part of the Nihon-Siki master race?Yes, I have, on multiple users of the forums, I won't go into names so no one gets jealous since I'm quite popular and desirable, but unlike the one above me, you're not one of them, sorry, OP. |
|
| Nope. I've had numerous "crushes" (Wouldn't call it that, I'd call it thirsting) on different individuals at different points in my life. Never acted upon it and never will. A man that succumbs to his instincts is not the person I want to be. jk nobody loves me |
| M-maybe...I...I ..do. .... It tends to be complicated though. |
| i don't have any of that for quite awhile now, i'm actually starting to wonder if there's something wrong with me?? enlighten me guys |
Gin-chan said: Anime - it's not something that can be thought of in a hall for conferences. It is made out of strange juices current from the brain of animators.  |
| I've only had one real relationship (more than 2 weeks) in my life and it lasted around 8 months Nowadays I can't seem to tell the difference between sexual desire and romance Have to wait for the perfect one |
| poop |
Kosmonaut said: 'Tis hard to feel jealous by being second place in the heart of a man who has such bad taste in hair and romanization schemes that he would love a man with such a bourgeois haircut or one that unironically uses Hepburn-romanization.Sphinxter said: Yes indeed, you're the best one because you don't succumb to bourgeois feelings such as jealousy. How could I ever get jealous when all the others have such bourgeois hair and aren't even part of the Nihon-Siki master race?  |
It is obvious that "obscenity" is not a term capable of exact legal definition; in the practice of the courts, it means "anything that shocks the magistrate". — Bertrand Russell |
| Never have and never will that's the life I've chosen. |
 |
Sphinxter said: Kosmonaut said: 'Tis hard to feel jealous by being second place in the heart of a man who has such bad taste in hair and romanization schemes that he would love a man with such a bourgeois haircut or one that unironically uses Hepburn-romanization.Yes indeed, you're the best one because you don't succumb to bourgeois feelings such as jealousy. Nihon-Shiki and Kunrei-Shiki suck. Hepburn is better, because it's phonetic. |
|
Sphinxter said: How can I not have a crush on someone that presents such masterfully well-done graphic design works?Kosmonaut said: 'Tis hard to feel jealous by being second place in the heart of a man who has such bad taste in hair and romanization schemes that he would love a man with such a bourgeois haircut or one that unironically uses Hepburn-romanization.Yes indeed, you're the best one because you don't succumb to bourgeois feelings such as jealousy. As I said before, don't worry, there's enough of me for everyone, even for clearly inferior beings. No need to attack your harem peers. |
|
Seiya said: Except Hepburn isn't phonetic; that's the prætention of Hepburn; it gives a rough approximation of Japanese phonetics in the nearest English approximation as it was spoken in 1880. In 1880, the sound of "fu" was a bilabial fricative; this is a sound that is approximately in between the English "h" [glottal fricative] and "f" [labio-dental fricative]. Nowadays in the Tokyo dialect, it is mostly a labialized glottal fricative; as in pretty much the exact same sound as in "who" in most dialects of UK English.Sphinxter said: 'Tis hard to feel jealous by being second place in the heart of a man who has such bad taste in hair and romanization schemes that he would love a man with such a bourgeois haircut or one that unironically uses Hepburn-romanization. Nihon-Shiki and Kunrei-Shiki suck. Hepburn is better, because it's phonetic. Apart from that Hepburn isn't even consistent; if it wants to write <si> as <shi> because of the palatalization, then why doesn't it write <hi> as <hyi> instead, which undergoes the same palatalization and as a palatal fricative is pretty much realized identically as the /hj/ cluster in English "huge" or "human"; why does it write <senpai> and not <sempai> to better indicate the pronunciation? There is no language on the planet that has orthography based on surface realization opposed to phonemic repræsentation: speakers are generally completely unaware of this and have to be explained this to spell it which is why Kunrei is taught to children as they would just get confused why they would have to spell <zi. as <ji> or <hu> as <fu>, because it sounds like the former to them, and on top of that to give an actually accurate repræsentation the language would have to be spelt in the international phonetic alphabet instead because anything with the plain Latin alphabet will just be a dull approximation. And then finally one still has to deal with the immense amount of free variation that generally exists in languages, especially in a language with such a small phonemic inventory as Japanese. /s/ before /i/ isn't always an alveo-palatal fricative with Japanese speakers, it's often just an alveolar fricative, the same as English /s/ — Japanese speech has a lot of free variation in it so attempting to make a script based on surface-level realization is just prætentious and impossible. |
It is obvious that "obscenity" is not a term capable of exact legal definition; in the practice of the courts, it means "anything that shocks the magistrate". — Bertrand Russell |
Sphinxter said: Except Hepburn isn't phonetic; that's the prætention of Hepburn; it gives a rough approximation of Japanese phonetics in the nearest English approximation as it was spoken in 1880. In 1880, the sound of "fu" was a bilabial fricative; this is a sound that is approximately in between the English "h" [glottal fricative] and "f" [labio-dental fricative]. Nowadays in the Tokyo dialect, it is mostly a labialized glottal fricative; as in pretty much the exact same sound as in "who" in most dialects of UK English. Apart from that Hepburn isn't even consistent; if it wants to write <si> as <shi> because of the palatalization, then why doesn't it write <hi> as <hyi> instead, which undergoes the same palatalization and as a palatal fricative is pretty much realized identically as the /hj/ cluster in English "huge" or "human"; why does it write <senpai> and not <sempai> to better indicate the pronunciation? There is no language on the planet that has orthography based on surface realization opposed to phonemic repræsentation: speakers are generally completely unaware of this and have to be explained this to spell it which is why Kunrei is taught to children as they would just get confused why they would have to spell <zi. as <ji> or <hu> as <fu>, because it sounds like the former to them, and on top of that to give an actually accurate repræsentation the language would have to be spelt in the international phonetic alphabet instead because anything with the plain Latin alphabet will just be a dull approximation. And then finally one still has to deal with the immense amount of free variation that generally exists in languages, especially in a language with such a small phonemic inventory as Japanese. /s/ before /i/ isn't always an alveo-palatal fricative with Japanese speakers, it's often just an alveolar fricative, the same as English /s/ — Japanese speech has a lot of free variation in it so attempting to make a script based on surface-level realization is just prætentious and impossible. You can believe what you want to believe. I'm not wasting my time with you. I'm blocking you now. |
|
Seiya said: Sphinxter said: Except Hepburn isn't phonetic; that's the prætention of Hepburn; it gives a rough approximation of Japanese phonetics in the nearest English approximation as it was spoken in 1880. In 1880, the sound of "fu" was a bilabial fricative; this is a sound that is approximately in between the English "h" [glottal fricative] and "f" [labio-dental fricative]. Nowadays in the Tokyo dialect, it is mostly a labialized glottal fricative; as in pretty much the exact same sound as in "who" in most dialects of UK English. Apart from that Hepburn isn't even consistent; if it wants to write <si> as <shi> because of the palatalization, then why doesn't it write <hi> as <hyi> instead, which undergoes the same palatalization and as a palatal fricative is pretty much realized identically as the /hj/ cluster in English "huge" or "human"; why does it write <senpai> and not <sempai> to better indicate the pronunciation? There is no language on the planet that has orthography based on surface realization opposed to phonemic repræsentation: speakers are generally completely unaware of this and have to be explained this to spell it which is why Kunrei is taught to children as they would just get confused why they would have to spell <zi. as <ji> or <hu> as <fu>, because it sounds like the former to them, and on top of that to give an actually accurate repræsentation the language would have to be spelt in the international phonetic alphabet instead because anything with the plain Latin alphabet will just be a dull approximation. And then finally one still has to deal with the immense amount of free variation that generally exists in languages, especially in a language with such a small phonemic inventory as Japanese. /s/ before /i/ isn't always an alveo-palatal fricative with Japanese speakers, it's often just an alveolar fricative, the same as English /s/ — Japanese speech has a lot of free variation in it so attempting to make a script based on surface-level realization is just prætentious and impossible. You can believe what you want to believe. I'm not wasting my time with you. I'm blocking you now. don't block him Seiya come on you guys peace on Earth yo |
| I CELEBRATE myself, And what I assume you shall assume, For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you. |
Gan_water said: Seiya said: You can believe what you want to believe. I'm not wasting my time with you. I'm blocking you now. don't block him Seiya come on you guys peace on Earth yo I've never liked that user. The blocking was a long time coming, and you're not going to convince me otherwise. |
|
Gan_water said: You still love me, don't you?Seiya said: You can believe what you want to believe. I'm not wasting my time with you. I'm blocking you now. don't block him Seiya come on you guys peace on Earth yo |
It is obvious that "obscenity" is not a term capable of exact legal definition; in the practice of the courts, it means "anything that shocks the magistrate". — Bertrand Russell |
| I never had a crush on anyone but I think the girl that works at the supermarket near home is extremely hot. She wears a wedding ring, so no approaching for me. Sphinxter said: I thought what we had was special. Kosmonaut said: 'Tis hard to feel jealous by being second place in the heart of a man who has such bad taste in hair and romanization schemes that he would love a man with such a bourgeois haircut or one that unironically uses Hepburn-romanization.Yes indeed, you're the best one because you don't succumb to bourgeois feelings such as jealousy. |
 Leading biologist Scott Pitnick said: The bigger your 'nads, the smaller your brains |
Sphinxter said: You still love me, don't you? One love brotha but no I don't know you like that lol |
| I CELEBRATE myself, And what I assume you shall assume, For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you. |
Bakchos said: Indeed so — I too would stay clear of the crazy that actually believes in this sentimental tradition.I never had a crush on anyone but I think the girl that works at the supermarket near home is extremely hot. She wears a wedding ring, so no approaching for me. |
It is obvious that "obscenity" is not a term capable of exact legal definition; in the practice of the courts, it means "anything that shocks the magistrate". — Bertrand Russell |
Sphinxter said: Enough of the deflection. Do you have a crush or not? Asking for a friend.Except Hepburn isn't phonetic; that's the prætention of Hepburn; it gives a rough approximation of Japanese phonetics in the nearest English approximation as it was spoken in 1880. In 1880, the sound of "fu" was a bilabial fricative; this is a sound that is approximately in between the English "h" [glottal fricative] and "f" [labio-dental fricative]. Nowadays in the Tokyo dialect, it is mostly a labialized glottal fricative; as in pretty much the exact same sound as in "who" in most dialects of UK English. Apart from that Hepburn isn't even consistent; if it wants to write <si> as <shi> because of the palatalization, then why doesn't it write <hi> as <hyi> instead, which undergoes the same palatalization and as a palatal fricative is pretty much realized identically as the /hj/ cluster in English "huge" or "human"; why does it write <senpai> and not <sempai> to better indicate the pronunciation? There is no language on the planet that has orthography based on surface realization opposed to phonemic repræsentation: speakers are generally completely unaware of this and have to be explained this to spell it which is why Kunrei is taught to children as they would just get confused why they would have to spell <zi. as <ji> or <hu> as <fu>, because it sounds like the former to them, and on top of that to give an actually accurate repræsentation the language would have to be spelt in the international phonetic alphabet instead because anything with the plain Latin alphabet will just be a dull approximation. And then finally one still has to deal with the immense amount of free variation that generally exists in languages, especially in a language with such a small phonemic inventory as Japanese. /s/ before /i/ isn't always an alveo-palatal fricative with Japanese speakers, it's often just an alveolar fricative, the same as English /s/ — Japanese speech has a lot of free variation in it so attempting to make a script based on surface-level realization is just prætentious and impossible. |
operationvalkyri said: I have yet to meet the man to rival my greatness, and be worthy of my love.Sphinxter said: Enough of the deflection. Do you have a crush or not? Asking for a friend.Except Hepburn isn't phonetic; that's the prætention of Hepburn; it gives a rough approximation of Japanese phonetics in the nearest English approximation as it was spoken in 1880. In 1880, the sound of "fu" was a bilabial fricative; this is a sound that is approximately in between the English "h" [glottal fricative] and "f" [labio-dental fricative]. Nowadays in the Tokyo dialect, it is mostly a labialized glottal fricative; as in pretty much the exact same sound as in "who" in most dialects of UK English. Apart from that Hepburn isn't even consistent; if it wants to write <si> as <shi> because of the palatalization, then why doesn't it write <hi> as <hyi> instead, which undergoes the same palatalization and as a palatal fricative is pretty much realized identically as the /hj/ cluster in English "huge" or "human"; why does it write <senpai> and not <sempai> to better indicate the pronunciation? There is no language on the planet that has orthography based on surface realization opposed to phonemic repræsentation: speakers are generally completely unaware of this and have to be explained this to spell it which is why Kunrei is taught to children as they would just get confused why they would have to spell <zi. as <ji> or <hu> as <fu>, because it sounds like the former to them, and on top of that to give an actually accurate repræsentation the language would have to be spelt in the international phonetic alphabet instead because anything with the plain Latin alphabet will just be a dull approximation. And then finally one still has to deal with the immense amount of free variation that generally exists in languages, especially in a language with such a small phonemic inventory as Japanese. /s/ before /i/ isn't always an alveo-palatal fricative with Japanese speakers, it's often just an alveolar fricative, the same as English /s/ — Japanese speech has a lot of free variation in it so attempting to make a script based on surface-level realization is just prætentious and impossible. 'Tis wonderful to be lonely at the top, whence I stare down upon the feeble masses so verily inferior. |
It is obvious that "obscenity" is not a term capable of exact legal definition; in the practice of the courts, it means "anything that shocks the magistrate". — Bertrand Russell |
| I only develop feelings for 2d people. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
More topics from this board
» Is there a cure for mental illness?DesuMaiden - Yesterday |
14 |
by JaniSIr
»»
11 minutes ago |
|
» What is comedy for you?TheOmnivert - Jun 13, 2020 |
48 |
by ProGoddess
»»
14 minutes ago |
|
» You been a mod or adminstrator of any website?DesuMaiden - Apr 7 |
40 |
by ProGoddess
»»
21 minutes ago |
|
» 2023-2024 NBA Season Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )deg - Jun 18, 2023 |
803 |
by SilentAssassin88
»»
23 minutes ago |
|
» How do you deal with spam texts?4630_Yen_Chan - 2 hours ago |
5 |
by ProGoddess
»»
27 minutes ago |