| https://www.dailystar.co.uk/real-life/pregnant-mum-live-stream-birth-24082300 Its over for men Im telling you. Welcome to female empowerment in 2021 |
JuggernautttMay 11, 2021 9:27 AM
| Fucking Christ lmaoooooooo |
| And what is the problem here? This should be a free market. I am personally interested in seeing such a procedure, although I would never pay anywhere near 10k for it. |
| I would love to know how well masturbating to a woman giving birth would go. But I'm not even going to bother thinking about that, let alone try it. |
 |
| Childcare is very expensive these days. |
| what the fuck. onlyfans is a mess at this point |
i fucking hate manga (keeps reading manga discord | o_ganji |
| sometimes I just wish this type of stuff is fake news lmao |
   |
| Damn I wish I came up with the concept of onlyfans |
149597871 said: And what is the problem here? This should be a free market. I am personally interested in seeing such a procedure, although I would never pay anywhere near 10k for it. The right of individuals to be born without mediatization? It may be good to wait till they can consent to anything before exposing them on a website designed for pornography? |
 |
| Family-friendly doesn't get any more family than this. With that mindset, I doubt she wants millions for any good use. And monopolising off of your newborn child ain't cool at all. Imagine that kid growing up with one of their classmates finding an old video of their mother giving birth to them. |
BunilleMay 11, 2021 10:54 AM
 |
| I wonder if someone is gonna pay for it. Like sure there's people who probably have a fetish for women giving birth but 10k is a but much don't ya think |
 |
| I was disgusted when I caught a glimpse of my sister breastfeeding, a live stream birth could destroy me |
    |
| I feel bad for anyone who's gonna waste their money like this |
 ManWild |
| I'm not sure why anyone would want to see that. |
 |
| I wonder how that child would feel like about their "mother", if you can even call her that way. |
| Today they say you're crazy, tomorrow they will say you're a genious. |
| someone needs to take away that child as soon as it gets birthed and give it to some foster family or something that woman should definitely not be a mother jesus christ |
  𝐈𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐝... 𝐈 𝐠𝐮𝐞𝐬𝐬 𝐈 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐬𝐭 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐧𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 -Yuuichi Onodera |
| Betabux is very easy to obtain for females nowadays. Rather than getting salty that equalty is a meme, I just accept it. |
 |
I do not remember my own birth very well, so I cannot do it. Lolsebca said: 149597871 said: And what is the problem here? This should be a free market. I am personally interested in seeing such a procedure, although I would never pay anywhere near 10k for it. The right of individuals to be born without mediatization? It may be good to wait till they can consent to anything before exposing them on a website designed for pornography? There is nothing "pornographic" about a woman giving birth. If anything, it can be considered educational. You can find childbirth videos on the internet that were uploaded for other purposes. Complaining about "consent" just because it is on a controversial website that some people use to upload pornography does not seem justified. Technically speaking, OnlyFans is a very unique platform with all kinds of people on it. Her "fans" may subscribe only to her and do it to educate themselves about pregnancy. |
149597871May 11, 2021 6:15 PM
| This is very gross for public display, childbirth does not look pleasant, plus it's painful. The only people who should ever do such a thing are doctors and nurses for educational purposes. |
 |
Koogmaster said: OnlyFans was a mistake Social media in general has changed the game completely Vespidae said: LMAOOOOO get that bag queen I thought queens had more dignity than that🤔 she ain't no queen. |
| Doesn't hold a candle to that hillarious time some girl did a show using a fake dead faetus and blood and it caused so much rage among pro lifers. |
| ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
149597871 said: I do not remember my own birth very well, so I cannot do it. Lolsebca said: The right of individuals to be born without mediatization? It may be good to wait till they can consent to anything before exposing them on a website designed for pornography? There is nothing "pornographic" about a woman giving birth. If anything, it can be considered educational. You can find childbirth videos on the internet that were uploaded for other purposes. Complaining about "consent" just because it is on a controversial website that some people use to upload pornography does not seem justified. Technically speaking, OnlyFans is a very unique platform with all kinds of people on it. Her "fans" may subscribe only to her and do it to educate themselves about pregnancy. Imagine seeing a porn video of your mom in 15 years if you were that baby then. I cannot imagine at least 1 or 2 will/have already seen a video of their pregnant mother getting fucked. |
 |
| I don’t know what to say, this beyond stupidity |
    ☁ |
| imagine being that child lmao xx |
 |
Kayle_x_Morgana said: 149597871 said: I do not remember my own birth very well, so I cannot do it. There is nothing "pornographic" about a woman giving birth. If anything, it can be considered educational. You can find childbirth videos on the internet that were uploaded for other purposes. Complaining about "consent" just because it is on a controversial website that some people use to upload pornography does not seem justified. Technically speaking, OnlyFans is a very unique platform with all kinds of people on it. Her "fans" may subscribe only to her and do it to educate themselves about pregnancy. Imagine seeing a porn video of your mom in 15 years if you were that baby then. I cannot imagine at least 1 or 2 will/have already seen a video of their pregnant mother getting fucked. Ah, that scenario is slightly more plausible. It would be somewhat disturbing to see such a thing, sure. But then again, how many women find ways to monetize their pregnancy and childbirth? She probably made tens of thousands of dollars from all that, which is enough to pay the college tuition fee and all other expenses for her future child. And it was all perfectly legal. You should ask yourself from the perspective of someone who will never have such opportunities. Would you mind if your parents left you a fortune for the expense of some internet infamy? Or would you rather prefer to be raised in a poor family? It might be an ideological issue. Tsurii said: If you look up 'grasping at straws' in a dictionary, this is one of the examples given. More like "innocent until proven guilty." |
149597871May 12, 2021 2:25 AM
Tsurii said: 149597871 said: More like "innocent until proven guilty." Yeah, I too visit porn sites for research purposes. Are you trolling or are you actually like this? Do you have any evidence of the motives her subscribers have? |
149597871 said: And what is the problem here? This should be a free market. I am personally interested in seeing such a procedure, although I would never pay anywhere near 10k for it. You innocent soul... |
Tsurii said: Yeah, the general demographic of such websites. You know full well why people are attracted to websites like that instead of biology textbooks. You're arguing in bad faith and it shows. The problem is that you do not understand how paid content on OnlyFans works. It is not like the average "porn" website where everyone has access to everything and people go there for the sole purpose of masturbating. You only have access to the premium content that you have paid for. Lots of people do not even upload pornographic material (though you can fetishize anything technically, yes). For example, I can start an OnlyFans and only upload videos of me chopping onions. If people want to see that, they will pay for it. If someone is willing to pay $10,000 to watch childbirth, he or she should be allowed to do it. I feel that most people are angered by the fact that it is OnlyFans. If it was some other, allegedly "educational," website, then no one would care. In a sense, chances are your reasoning is the one that stems from bad faith. |
149597871 said: Tsurii said: Yeah, the general demographic of such websites. You know full well why people are attracted to websites like that instead of biology textbooks. You're arguing in bad faith and it shows. The problem is that you do not understand how paid content on OnlyFans works. It is not like the average "porn" website where everyone has access to everything and people go there for the sole purpose of masturbating. You only have access to the premium content that you have paid for. Lots of people do not even upload pornographic material (though you can fetishize anything technically, yes). For example, I can start an OnlyFans and only upload videos of me chopping onions. If people want to see that, they will pay for it. If someone is willing to pay $10,000 to watch childbirth, he or she should be allowed to do it. I feel that most people are angered by the fact that it is OnlyFans. If it was some other, allegedly "educational," website, then no one would care. In a sense, chances are your reasoning is the one that stems from bad faith. Click the article, google the lady. Youll see that the motivation definitely isnt education, its purely money. Her demographic isn't a group of scientists, its randoms on onlyfans that jack off to her content. |
| @BurnMyBread00 Of course she does it for money. I have never said she does it in the name of science, ROFL @Tsurii If it is "fetishization of birth," then what is stopping these same people from watching such videos on other, more "educational" platforms? Why is OnlyFans different all of a sudden? That is a slippery slope. You never know what the person's motives are and who is watching the videos. If you cancel one, you will have to cancel all of them eventually based on the same reasoning. That is both backward and anti-free market thinking that reminds me of this moralist campaign a few years ago to cancel parents who upload videos of them bathing their babies, saying that they "attract and make money out of pedophiles." Could there be an actual pedophile masturbating to that content? Maybe. That is not her concern anyway since she bears no legal responsibility for what other people do behind the screen while watching her content. |
| Damn, the bastards masturbating to this are really down dirty |
 |
Tsurii said: 149597871 said: @BurnMyBread00 Of course she does it for money. I have never said she does it in the name of science, ROFL @Tsurii If it is "fetishization of birth," then what is stopping these same people from watching such videos on other, more "educational" platforms? Why is OnlyFans different all of a sudden? That is a slippery slope. You never know what the person's motives are and who is watching the videos. If you cancel one, you will have to cancel all of them eventually based on the same reasoning. That is both backward and anti-free market thinking that reminds me of this moralist campaign a few years ago to cancel parents who upload videos of them bathing their babies, saying that they "attract and make money out of pedophiles." Could there be an actual pedophile masturbating to that content? Maybe. That is not her concern anyway since she bears no legal responsibility for what other people do behind the screen while watching her content. If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. If it's a paid birth video on OnlyFans, if the creator is only in it for the cold cash, it's probably fetish porn. I never made the claim fetish porn should be illegal. I'm just saying it's fetish porn and that it sure isn't nice to include your (un)born child in it, and that I'm personally very much morally against it. If you think that including your child in fetish porn is just an expression of the free market, I can do nothing but laugh at you. Ah, yes. Good luck convincing a pregnant woman to film herself giving birth for free in the name of science. Of course the creator is there for the money. She should be. If you use the word "morally," you are basically admitting that your arguments stem from supra-rational rather than rational reasoning. Childbirth is not porn. She does not engage in "sexual acts" with the child. She provides non-pornographic content. What other people do with it is not her responsibility. If you cannot grasp that, then you should perhaps stop and rethink your position. |
| Guys the newborn isn't what's being fetishized I believe. I don't think pedophiles even like newborn babies. They're covered in blood and all those other fluids and disgusting shit. She has developed an audience who are attracted to pregnant women. It's what HER body does during pregnancy that they like (breasts, the belly). So her lying on bed naked and pushing and puffing is what they want to see. It's not about the baby lol. They'll probably dip once the baby is out. For them best case scenario is if the procedure takes half a day. |
|
| Look what our generation has turned into. |
 Scordolo's Recent Reviews To your eternity Vanitas no Karte |
Tsurii said: 149597871 said: Ah, yes. Good luck convincing a pregnant woman to film herself giving birth for free in the name of science. Of course the creator is there for the money. She should be. If you use the word "morally," you are basically admitting that your arguments stem from supra-rational rather than rational reasoning. Childbirth is not porn. She does not engage in "sexual acts" with the child. She provides non-pornographic content. What other people do with it is not her responsibility. If you cannot grasp that, then you should perhaps stop and rethink your position. This discussion is fundamentally supra-rational. We're discussing if something is 'fine' or 'wrong' - have been for hours. I don't know why you're trying to pull that out of a hat like you caught me on something. Do continue with your 'childbirth on onlyfans is not porn' tirade, I think you've disqualified yourself enough for me to dip. Well, no, since you said that she uses the child to film fetish porn which implies that she is doing something very illegal, but that stems from supra-rational reasoning while my reasoning is rational and based on facts: childbirth is not porn. If you "morally" disagree with her but believe that she should be allowed to do it, then fair enough. I could not care less about what is "morally" right or wrong in one's subjective opinion. I still do not understand why you put so much emphasis on OnlyFans as if uploading it somewhere else is much different and morally better. Pros: Everyone is above 18 and paid for something that they wanted to see. She will earn some money out of it. A limited number of people get to see it. |
| The child cannot consent to being filmed for profit. This is already a problem on platforms such as YouTube. But this case disgusts me even more. If you don't love your child enough to protect it, don't have it. I guess the exploitation of your own child is acceptable for some, as long as it's monetized. Moreover, the existence and constant celebration of this platform is only setting us back. But that's another topic. |
| free markets go brrrrrrrrrrrr |
| heh. |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
271 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |