| http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2280711/Women-seduce-men-cybersex-webcam--BLACKMAIL-threatening-post-nude-images-online.html ^More than 50 cases were reported in 2012 from Singapore where attractive girls would seduce horny dudes into cybersex and film them....only to later blackmail them. Here is a reenactment: |
| LOL no seriously, they get 0.0200000069% of my sympathy. |
 |
| "Don't act blur." That reenactment was pretty hilarious. But this is pretty disgusting. The sad thing is, most people would think this situation is funny. I've seen it so many times in "romance comedy" anime and manga. Boy gets caught doing something perverted by a girl. She blackmails him to do whatever. Hilarious. If it were the other way around, and it were a girl getting blackmailed, people would be screaming "Pervert! Sexual abuse! Disgusting pig man! Poor girl!" and it would be labeled NTR. Guy gets sexually harassed = joke. Girl gets sexually harassed = crime. |
 |
Enough guys blackmail women online, it's about time women start doing the same thing(even though it's probably a loop and it's a guy behind of it). I've actually got a list of sites they should target, guys are horrible on cam sites. |
     Short of the day: Monotonous Purgatory(MAL) ✰Public Domain Club | One Piece Club✰ |
| That acting. |
Len_Le said: That acting. Those camera angles. |
| Nicolas Cage tier. |
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
Red_Keys said: Guy gets sexually harassed = joke. Girl gets sexually harassed = crime. Double standard at it's best. Seriously though, you're 100% right. |
| I'm actually surprised this isn't more common. Or maybe it is and it just goes unreported. |
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
Red_Keys said: Guy gets sexually harassed = joke. Girl gets sexually harassed = crime. When the cause is that they were horny and reaching out to strangers, then no, I feel no sympathy for men or women. Both are adults and should know better, including how to not get bullied. Now if they were underage then it's a much more serious matter, and they can't really be blamed as much. |
|
JustALEX said: Red_Keys said: Guy gets sexually harassed = joke. Girl gets sexually harassed = crime. Double standard at it's best. Seriously though, you're 100% right. Except half the time for girls it's not that they were looking to do something perverted in the first place, but rather the guy ends up assaulting her in some way. You don't hear of many girls on cam sites looking for hot guys to get off to (do sites like that even exist?), but these guys were basically asking for it. So, in short, zero sympathy. |
| Lol that's what they get for being naive on the internet. |
Adair said: If you go on any cam site, within 5 minutes of a girl going on cam to talk to friends, people are saying take your top off, you're so hot, etc. For guys, they are naked when they first get on cam.JustALEX said: Red_Keys said: Guy gets sexually harassed = joke. Girl gets sexually harassed = crime. Double standard at it's best. Seriously though, you're 100% right. Except half the time for girls it's not that they were looking to do something perverted in the first place, but rather the guy ends up assaulting her in some way. You don't hear of many girls on cam sites looking for hot guys to get off to (do sites like that even exist?), but these guys were basically asking for it. So, in short, zero sympathy. |
Short of the day: Monotonous Purgatory(MAL) ✰Public Domain Club | One Piece Club✰ |
SirPigeon said: Except, they weren't strangers. Technically, they are, but if you read the article, it stated that these women were contacting the men first, establishing relationships on facebook and other social sites, and then they themselves initiating the web-chats and pressuring the guys into sexual activities.When the cause is that they were horny and reaching out to strangers, then no, I feel no sympathy for men or women. Adair said: Except, not if you read the article.Except half the time for girls it's not that they were looking to do something perverted in the first place, but rather the guy ends up assaulting her in some way. You don't hear of many girls on cam sites looking for hot guys to get off to (do sites like that even exist?), but these guys were basically asking for it. Is it naive and stupid? Absolutely. But if this story were about women getting blackmailed, I guarantee you there would already be multiple pages of comments stating about how it is disgusting, shameful, etc. |
|
| so if a guy makes a girl take her clothes off its a crime but if a girl makes a guy take his clothes off its funny wtf |
| RRRRRRRRRR |
| "Huh?! You want me to strip -- totoly?" "Don't act blur!" LOL Epic reenactment. I'd dare the guy to upload it to YouTube though. Nobody knows who I am online anyways. |
| My subjective reviews: katsureview.wordpress.com THE CHAT CLUB. |
| If you wouldn't want it shared publicly then you shouldn't do it. Whether it be 'secrets', nude photo's, or video's. Whether it be men or women I feel much the same on that. I don't have any pity for anyone, especially young people, who willingly provide such things to another party. |
| |
beavis2323 said: so if a guy makes a girl take her clothes off its a crime but if a girl makes a guy take his clothes off its funny wtf It's the same with crowded trains and buses. If a guy touches some girl's ass and she reports him his gonna have some cops in his face with really angry looks, if a girl craps yours balls and you report it the cops will be laughing and pointing at you. |
| The acting, the accents, everything about that video! Ahahaha. On a serious note if anyone does some stupid shit like that then they deserve... |
 |
| I don't think the guy was stupid. I think you all caring about the blackmail (or the guys involved) are stupid. Whoopie he got naked. Big deal. Life goes on. Nobody would get a penny out of me. |
| Good thing I don't have a webcam. hahahaha- |
| Random friend requests from hot girls on Facebook, lmao. "Keep your trousers on chaps." |
 |
Red_Keys said: Guy gets sexually harassed = joke. Girl gets sexually harassed = crime. It's the unfortunate reality of our society. |
| Fool Gets 0.000% sympathy I only give sympathy if the blackmail was someone they knew as that's betrayal, this is just a trap by Asian Cybergangs that is easy to avoid. |
 |
| So what, exactly? The guys' naked bodies will be exposed on the internet and no one will care, because it's not fapable material. |
 |
| I think people are laughing at the reenactment, not the situation itself. Reenactments of girls being abused are hilarious too. I remember seeing some sexual assault reenactment videos in health class once and our whole class was dying from laughter, much to the distress of the teacher. dperolio said: What about the fact that it could come back to haunt your professional career/ability to get a job? I'd say that's worth serious consideration for many people. I don't think the guy was stupid. I think you all caring about the blackmail (or the guys involved) are stupid. Whoopie he got naked. Big deal. Life goes on. Nobody would get a penny out of me. |
JoshFeb 21, 2013 11:50 AM
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
| :'D Funny, this happened to me except, that I got nudes. Who ever was on the other side, said she was a girl, wanted me to send nudes too. I sent her some pictures I found on Google. After that she tried to blackmail me into giving her 10,000$. This made my day, I cracked up and blocked her, wishing her a nice day. It's pretty obvious that they are fakes, girls are the cautious ones online the chances of a girl starting a chat with a guy are pretty low and those idiots that fall for this trick deserve zero sympathy. Sir Pigeon is completely right though, if they are underage it's a completely different matter. |
| I've never understood why guys show anything to anyone. I've gotten plenty from girls (though I did know them for awhile beforehand) and I never even let them hear my voice, let alone see me or my junk. That's not bragging or anything, girls on the internet are easy, and that's all varieties from the hotties to the fatties so I see no reason to go whipping your dick out unless you have some kind of fetish about showing it off. If a girl is asking to see your dick, something is up unless you've known each other for a long time, she's done sexual stuff for you, and she just wants something in return finally. For the record they were all of-age, deal with it feds. Point being - do guys really get off by showing their dick to people? The fuck is that all about? |
TallonKarrde23Feb 21, 2013 2:53 PM
 |
Post-Josh said: dperolio said: What about the fact that it could come back to haunt your professional career/ability to get a job? I'd say that's worth serious consideration for many people. I don't think the guy was stupid. I think you all caring about the blackmail (or the guys involved) are stupid. Whoopie he got naked. Big deal. Life goes on. Nobody would get a penny out of me. For getting naked? I sure wouldn't want any of those jobs anyway then. There are more than 3 and a half billion penises in the world (not counting ones not attached to people, nor those with more than one penis, nor women which have a penis). There's going to be double that within 30 years. And all of use get naked every day, usually multiple times per day (shower, sex, whatever else). I really don't see it as a big deal about getting naked. And you better inform those millions of cam girls that they won't be able to get a job in the future because they've shown their bodies.  Sorry but you're not special and this isn't a big deal at all.If you're planning to run for President or something in politics, this could indeed hurt your chances. Good luck with that though. |
dperolio said: And you better inform those millions of cam girls that they won't be able to get a job in the future because they've showed their bodies. Sorry but you're not special and this isn't a big deal at all.Actually, it is kind of a big deal in some scenarios. If you want a recent example of losing a job over having shown your body off in the past just look at Pawn Stars. They had hired a part-timer girl who they later found out worked as a model for Suicide Girls and she was promptly fired upon the discovery because the channel didn't want to promote that kind of stuff. As far as I'm aware, once this went onto all the news sites, she's been unemployed since as well. |
|
TallonKarrde23 said: dperolio said: And you better inform those millions of cam girls that they won't be able to get a job in the future because they've showed their bodies. Sorry but you're not special and this isn't a big deal at all.Actually, it is kind of a big deal in some scenarios. If you want a recent example of losing a job over having shown your body off in the past just look at Pawn Stars. They had hired a part-timer girl who they later found out worked as a model for Suicide Girls and she was promptly fired upon the discovery because the channel didn't want to promote that kind of stuff. Good for them. I sure wouldn't want any of those jobs anyway then. |
dperolio said: Good for them. I sure wouldn't want any of those jobs anyway then. That's not much of a counterpoint. You can claim that for every job, but the fact is almost any employer will not want someone who has worked anywhere near the porn industry or has any lewd material of them around online whatsoever. For all sorts of reasons. This is the real world, not happy 'this is normal anyway were all people' hippie land. Hell, you can get fired or skipped over for hiring for looking like an asshole in a facebook picture - let alone having someone email them a video of you jerking off. Plus the more social side of things - as showing your friends and family that stuff would definitely cause complications for many people, or at least extremely awkward situations. Again - real world - mom might have seen your dick as a baby but it's different when you're in your 20s or 30s and also whacking it off. |
|
TallonKarrde23 said: dperolio said: Good for them. I sure wouldn't want any of those jobs anyway then. That's not much of a counterpoint. You can claim that for every job, but the fact is almost any employer will not want someone who has worked anywhere near the porn industry or has any lewd material of them around online whatsoever. For all sorts of reasons. This is the real world, not happy 'this is normal anyway were all people' hippie land. Hell, you can get fired or skipped over for hiring for looking like an asshole in a facebook picture - let alone having someone email them a video of you jerking off. Plus the more social side of things - as showing your friends and family that stuff would definitely cause complications for many people, or at least extremely awkward situations. I think you're wrong (and paranoid and crazy) but I'm not going to argue with you. Also, I'm not a lawyer, but if what you said is true, I'm pretty certain she could sue them. |
dperolio said: I think you're wrong (and paranoid and crazy) but I'm not going to argue with you. Also, I'm not a lawyer, but if what you said is true, I'm pretty certain she could sue them. They fired her for other reasons on paper, while the real reason was clear given she did nothing as far as her actual employer (the store owner) said, but History Channel made them get rid of her RIGHT after finding out that information. You can't sue if they can claim it's for something else. You can fire a guy for being black as long as you say it's because he was late once instead. edit - not to mention, suing a massive company like the History Channel or whoever owns it would cost a shit ton of money, more than you'd get in return even if you won or had a settlement. |
|
TallonKarrde23 said: dperolio said: I think you're wrong (and paranoid and crazy) but I'm not going to argue with you. Also, I'm not a lawyer, but if what you said is true, I'm pretty certain she could sue them. They fired her for other reasons on paper, while the real reason was clear given she did nothing as far as her actual employer (the store owner) said, but History Channel made them get rid of her RIGHT after finding out that information. You can't sue if they can claim it's for something else. You can fire a guy for being black as long as you say it's because he was late once instead. That's funny. Of course you can still sue them. You think all the people who win those cases go up against companies that kindly bend over and say, "Yes it's true we fired him because he's black :D" |
MarineSlate said: Post-Josh said: Brendan Fraser tier. Fixed I don't think you actually understood the joke. |
| I don't know who Brendan Fraser is, so I just rolled with it, haha. |
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
TallonKarrde23 said: You can if you had evidence, but since she doesn't have evidence, it's a shame she should go off spouting unfounded accusations.dperolio said: I think you're wrong (and paranoid and crazy) but I'm not going to argue with you. Also, I'm not a lawyer, but if what you said is true, I'm pretty certain she could sue them. You can't sue if they can claim it's for something else. |
| My subjective reviews: katsureview.wordpress.com THE CHAT CLUB. |
katsucats said: TallonKarrde23 said: You can if you had evidence, but since she doesn't have evidence, it's a shame she should go off spouting unfounded accusations.dperolio said: I think you're wrong (and paranoid and crazy) but I'm not going to argue with you. Also, I'm not a lawyer, but if what you said is true, I'm pretty certain she could sue them. You can't sue if they can claim it's for something else. She doesn't have evidence? I didn't know you were such a close friend. Also, this is work for the lawyers, not some random person on the internet who knows nothing about the circumstances, no offense. |
dperolio said: She does? Then why is she not pressing charges? Do you realize by arguing with me in this manner you are also contradicting your earlier statements?katsucats said: TallonKarrde23 said: You can if you had evidence, but since she doesn't have evidence, it's a shame she should go off spouting unfounded accusations.dperolio said: I think you're wrong (and paranoid and crazy) but I'm not going to argue with you. Also, I'm not a lawyer, but if what you said is true, I'm pretty certain she could sue them. You can't sue if they can claim it's for something else. She doesn't have evidence? I didn't know you were such a close friend. Also, this is work for the lawyers, not some random person on the internet who knows nothing about the circumstances, no offense. |
| My subjective reviews: katsureview.wordpress.com THE CHAT CLUB. |
| Life imitating hentai haha What a stupid thing to do with so many sites out there where you can see naked girls. MarineSlate said: Post-Josh said: Kristen Stewart tier. Fixed This is how you fix it. |
on TallonKarrde23 said: I don't understand it either, but I go on some cam sites. And there's always only like a couple of girls online with the camera pointing to their face wanting to talk to people. And then like 50 guys all with their webcams pointed at their junk, constantly going on other cams "I'm about to cum want to watch", and all that other stuff.I've never understood why guys show anything to anyone. I've gotten plenty from girls (though I did know them for awhile beforehand) and I never even let them hear my voice, let alone see me or my junk. That's not bragging or anything, girls on the internet are easy, and that's all varieties from the hotties to the fatties so I see no reason to go whipping your dick out unless you have some kind of fetish about showing it off. If a girl is asking to see your dick, something is up unless you've known each other for a long time, she's done sexual stuff for you, and she just wants something in return finally. For the record they were all of-age, deal with it feds. Point being - do guys really get off by showing their dick to people? The fuck is that all about? |
Short of the day: Monotonous Purgatory(MAL) ✰Public Domain Club | One Piece Club✰ |
| LOL but the reenactment video was funny - those camera angles were he is hoping no one can see the video. |
 |
| females are psychologically stronger than males, so they use that for their amusement. |
| Seriously, what did they think was going to happen? That's what you get for thinking with your dick... |
Wecc said: All Hail HaXXspetten King of the Loli Traps! |
| Why can't it just be a even trade? Why does it have to be soooo one sided? What were these guys thinking? D= |
 "I like to expose what people hide. I'm an intellectual rapist." - Furudo Erika |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
271 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |