New
May 14, 2017 10:47 AM
#1
The official website for Koi to Uso has announced cast members for the upcoming series. The anime is slated to begin its broadcast on July 3. Cast Misaki Takasaki: Kana Hanazawa (3-gatsu no Lion) Lilina Sanada: Yui Makino (Tsubasa Chronicle) Yukari Nejima: Ryota Osaka (Gokukoku no Brynhildr) The first two episodes will be pre-screened at TOHO Cinemas Shinjuku theatre in Tokyo on June 24. Voice actor Kana Hanazawa and Ryota Osaka will make an appearance at the event along with director Seiki Takuno. Trailer 2 Source: Moca News |
tsubasaloverMay 15, 2017 1:55 PM
May 14, 2017 10:52 AM
#2
May 14, 2017 11:01 AM
#3
Kitsu-nee said: Meh, looks kinda dull, and all main characters have eyes constantly wide open like this: ʘ‿ʘ, it's so creepy ;_; I second this... :/ And here I thought it was a sequel to Kuzu no Honkai.. :/ |
May 14, 2017 11:11 AM
#4
Lol kana is voicing misaki We all know how this harem will end ... My 1/10 is ready |
May 14, 2017 11:22 AM
#5
tragedydesu said: Isn't a Harem supposed to be 3/4 more girls though?Lol kana is voicing misaki We all know how this harem will end ... My 1/10 is ready |
Sup... |
May 14, 2017 11:29 AM
#6
SenpaiJay98 said: tragedydesu said: Isn't a Harem supposed to be 3/4 more girls though?Lol kana is voicing misaki We all know how this harem will end ... My 1/10 is ready You're right , is a love triangle |
tragedydesuMay 14, 2017 11:51 AM
May 14, 2017 11:36 AM
#7
Lmao. Though, looking at the synopsis, she seems to be the girl the MC actually likes. Maybe HanaKana will win this time... Only time will tell. |
May 14, 2017 11:58 AM
#8
Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! |
May 14, 2017 12:50 PM
#10
Their eyes look super creepy. Way too big, even by anime standards. I didn't have high hopes for it, but now I'm seriously put off. |
May 14, 2017 1:07 PM
#11
Well, if I did not know that this anime was announced simultaneously with Kuzu, then I would think that this is the appearance of trend for agnsty romance. Illyricus said: Lmao. Though, looking at the synopsis, she seems to be the girl the MC actually likes. Maybe HanaKana will win this time... Only time will tell. In this case, she is "a girl from the first cover," so we can hope. |
May 14, 2017 1:29 PM
#12
The art doesn't look that bad, actually quite good, the eyes are on the next level, tho. |
One Piece episode 914 & 915 & 1027 were a mistake and 957 brought the salvation - FMmatron |
May 14, 2017 1:40 PM
#13
Cast pretty solid. I read the manga already but, I'm still iffy with Lidenfilm's adaptations, especially with Yamada but...We'll see. Hope it's good |
2D > 3D |
May 14, 2017 2:02 PM
#14
budget hanabi with alien eyes voiced by hanakana as female lead... definitely not gonna watch it |
May 14, 2017 2:13 PM
#15
Hell yeah, Hana is going to voice Misaki! That must mean Misaki is going to lose and the guy would make the obviously right decision going with Lilina. Too bad the the fucker already picked in the manga though, but maybe he'll get his head straight near the end |
. |
May 14, 2017 2:50 PM
#16
Yay finally though here i am, being apparently the only one thinking "hum and what about Nisaka?" I mean, Nisaka IS a main character, why not reveal his seiyuu along with the others? AND MORE IMPORTANTLY AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO THOUGHT THAT HERE Also I like Kana but im sad she doesnt voice my best girl, though i find Misaki pretty cute physically I don't know Ririna's seiyuu and Ryota Osaka will, once again, voice a nice guy, like, that boy never voices an evil character haha, i was quite sure he would get the role tbh I ant Nisaka to be voiced by Kimura Ryouhei just for the ship |
ShiririinMay 14, 2017 2:53 PM
May 14, 2017 2:57 PM
#17
I like the manga but this character design os really weird when animated |
Baby, daijobanai... |
May 14, 2017 4:22 PM
#18
It looks fine and the selection of cast members are pretty decent. Looking forward to it. |
May 14, 2017 4:49 PM
#19
May 14, 2017 5:04 PM
#20
Syrup- said: Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! You're judging based on basically nothing, but ok. Can't wait to see you complain each week while watching, then score it a 1/10 when it ends. Seems to be the hot new thing to do in the MAL community. |
May 14, 2017 5:32 PM
#21
Lol, many people is stereotyping HanaKana to losing heroine huh. I haven't read the manga so I don't know how the romance goes though. Eyes are too big imo, but that's okay I guess. Need a time to get used to chara design. The premise is interesting, but I wonder if the execution and the story itself will be good. |
JJHRTDMay 14, 2017 5:54 PM
May 14, 2017 6:42 PM
#22
jejehartadi said: Lol, many people is stereotyping HanaKana to losing heroine huh. I haven't read the manga so I don't know how the romance goes though. Eyes are too big imo, but that's okay I guess. Need a time to get used to chara design. The premise is interesting, but I wonder if the execution and the story itself will be good. People are kind of forgetting that even if majority of the time KanaHana loses... being real, she did win in few occasions. :/ They are kind of forgetting that and I mean I know the stereotype and shit but... I mean it also doesn't really devalue stuff either. At least in my opinion. Unless the content itself from the actual manga sucks then that's another different thing. |
removed-userMay 14, 2017 6:46 PM
May 14, 2017 8:07 PM
#23
I've always seen this one around, but never had the chance to read the manga. Maybe I will since this is announced. |
|
May 14, 2017 9:58 PM
#25
I don't know why but that purple haired girl reminds me of Hanabi from Kuzu no Honkai. |
May 14, 2017 10:48 PM
#26
Wow sugoi What a role character voice already complete? Maybe i want to be seiyuu Hehe |
May 14, 2017 11:07 PM
#27
Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! You're judging based on basically nothing, but ok. Can't wait to see you complain each week while watching, then score it a 1/10 when it ends. Seems to be the hot new thing to do in the MAL community. If you think those are basically nothing, you definitely need to improve your standards. |
May 14, 2017 11:35 PM
#28
I'm still not sure if I want to watch this even though I saw this. Lilina Sanada: Yui Makino (Tsubasa Chronicle) |
tsubasaloverMay 15, 2017 1:56 PM
I ♥ Two Syaorans from Tsubasa RESERVoir CHRoNiCLE and TRC!!! |
May 15, 2017 12:01 AM
#29
Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! You're judging based on basically nothing, but ok. Can't wait to see you complain each week while watching, then score it a 1/10 when it ends. Seems to be the hot new thing to do in the MAL community. If you think those are basically nothing, you definitely need to improve your standards. Two PVs and a synopsis. Yeah, we really got a fucking gold mine here. |
May 15, 2017 12:22 AM
#30
Kittens-kun said: Are you blind? We have the manga to judge the source, and we have the studio, and we have the voice actors. If you're seriously unable to make a decision based on that, uninstallSyrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! You're judging based on basically nothing, but ok. Can't wait to see you complain each week while watching, then score it a 1/10 when it ends. Seems to be the hot new thing to do in the MAL community. If you think those are basically nothing, you definitely need to improve your standards. Two PVs and a synopsis. Yeah, we really got a fucking gold mine here. brought to you by the studio that made masterpieces such as Terraformars, the Berserk anime, Sekkou Boys QED |
May 15, 2017 12:30 AM
#31
Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Are you blind? We have the manga to judge the source, and we have the studio, and we have the voice actors. If you're seriously unable to make a decision based on that, uninstallSyrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! You're judging based on basically nothing, but ok. Can't wait to see you complain each week while watching, then score it a 1/10 when it ends. Seems to be the hot new thing to do in the MAL community. If you think those are basically nothing, you definitely need to improve your standards. Two PVs and a synopsis. Yeah, we really got a fucking gold mine here. brought to you by the studio that made masterpieces such as Terraformars, the Berserk anime, Sekkou Boys QED You're calling the adaptation you haven't seen trash though. It's a separate entity from the manga, just like every show. |
May 15, 2017 1:23 AM
#32
Kittens-kun said: "It's not the same!" Do you even know how adaptations work? It seems like you're discarding logic for emotion now. The anime is going to definitely work like a commercial for the manga. Don't be surprised when it just suddenly ends on a cliff hanger and NEVER gets a season 2. How have you seen 300ish anime and not noticed this? Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! You're judging based on basically nothing, but ok. Can't wait to see you complain each week while watching, then score it a 1/10 when it ends. Seems to be the hot new thing to do in the MAL community. If you think those are basically nothing, you definitely need to improve your standards. Two PVs and a synopsis. Yeah, we really got a fucking gold mine here. brought to you by the studio that made masterpieces such as Terraformars, the Berserk anime, Sekkou Boys QED You're calling the adaptation you haven't seen trash though. It's a separate entity from the manga, just like every show. |
May 15, 2017 4:28 AM
#33
I tried to get into the manga but remember it was pretty bad. Mostly how contrived it feels, and the lack of any attempt at suspending disbelief from the worldbuilding (which is absent) This is basically just pretense for a love triangle. |
May 15, 2017 8:00 AM
#34
Those eyes though. I'll probably end up watching this. Looks cute. |
May 15, 2017 10:10 AM
#35
Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: "It's not the same!" Do you even know how adaptations work? It seems like you're discarding logic for emotion now. The anime is going to definitely work like a commercial for the manga. Don't be surprised when it just suddenly ends on a cliff hanger and NEVER gets a season 2. How have you seen 300ish anime and not noticed this? Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Are you blind? We have the manga to judge the source, and we have the studio, and we have the voice actors. If you're seriously unable to make a decision based on that, uninstallSyrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! You're judging based on basically nothing, but ok. Can't wait to see you complain each week while watching, then score it a 1/10 when it ends. Seems to be the hot new thing to do in the MAL community. If you think those are basically nothing, you definitely need to improve your standards. Two PVs and a synopsis. Yeah, we really got a fucking gold mine here. brought to you by the studio that made masterpieces such as Terraformars, the Berserk anime, Sekkou Boys QED You're calling the adaptation you haven't seen trash though. It's a separate entity from the manga, just like every show. By that logic aren't like... I don't know, most animes that are part of source materials just an mere advertisement? Regardless of the outcome or how the adaptation does itself (good or bad)? Just asking. Not really jumping into a rage quit bullshit here btw, Nah. |
May 15, 2017 10:34 AM
#36
Symphyon said: It's generally accepted and proven that anime adaptations are full length commercials for their adapted product. Just like manga adaptations are commercial for the anime original. The increasing amount of anime that is not original and only serves to promote a product is what people are talking about when they say that anime is "dying". Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Are you blind? We have the manga to judge the source, and we have the studio, and we have the voice actors. If you're seriously unable to make a decision based on that, uninstallSyrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! You're judging based on basically nothing, but ok. Can't wait to see you complain each week while watching, then score it a 1/10 when it ends. Seems to be the hot new thing to do in the MAL community. If you think those are basically nothing, you definitely need to improve your standards. Two PVs and a synopsis. Yeah, we really got a fucking gold mine here. brought to you by the studio that made masterpieces such as Terraformars, the Berserk anime, Sekkou Boys QED You're calling the adaptation you haven't seen trash though. It's a separate entity from the manga, just like every show. By that logic aren't like... I don't know, most animes that are part of source materials just an mere advertisement? Regardless of the outcome or how the adaptation does itself (good or bad)? Just asking. Not really jumping into a rage quit bullshit here btw, Nah. I don't generally mind adaptations of manga (LNs are a different case), since they make up most of your airing anime these days, but this one looks horribly generic and I was just calling those qualities out. |
May 15, 2017 12:16 PM
#37
Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: "It's not the same!" Do you even know how adaptations work? It seems like you're discarding logic for emotion now. The anime is going to definitely work like a commercial for the manga. Don't be surprised when it just suddenly ends on a cliff hanger and NEVER gets a season 2. How have you seen 300ish anime and not noticed this? Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Are you blind? We have the manga to judge the source, and we have the studio, and we have the voice actors. If you're seriously unable to make a decision based on that, uninstallSyrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! You're judging based on basically nothing, but ok. Can't wait to see you complain each week while watching, then score it a 1/10 when it ends. Seems to be the hot new thing to do in the MAL community. If you think those are basically nothing, you definitely need to improve your standards. Two PVs and a synopsis. Yeah, we really got a fucking gold mine here. brought to you by the studio that made masterpieces such as Terraformars, the Berserk anime, Sekkou Boys QED You're calling the adaptation you haven't seen trash though. It's a separate entity from the manga, just like every show. What am saying is, you should judge the anime based on it's own merits, what it brings to the table. You shouldn't think an anime will definitely be trash just because the source material wasn't that great. There's shows that are better than their source, and worse. You can't tell which this will be until you actually watch it. If I told you that your favorite show was trash because the it's source was, you'd be fine with that? That's the logic you're presenting here. |
May 15, 2017 2:22 PM
#38
Can you guys just stop complaining and give it a try ? Just enjoy wtf are those elitists and shit. If you don't like the anime well that's your problem, we all have different tastes. But saying that it's going to be trash or anything else is stupid because it's just your opinion, only yours. Some will like it, some will not, that's it. |
May 15, 2017 8:12 PM
#39
Kittens-kun said: Or I could just not waste my time in the first place. As for calling my favourite anime trash, who gives a crap? Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Are you blind? We have the manga to judge the source, and we have the studio, and we have the voice actors. If you're seriously unable to make a decision based on that, uninstallSyrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! You're judging based on basically nothing, but ok. Can't wait to see you complain each week while watching, then score it a 1/10 when it ends. Seems to be the hot new thing to do in the MAL community. If you think those are basically nothing, you definitely need to improve your standards. Two PVs and a synopsis. Yeah, we really got a fucking gold mine here. brought to you by the studio that made masterpieces such as Terraformars, the Berserk anime, Sekkou Boys QED You're calling the adaptation you haven't seen trash though. It's a separate entity from the manga, just like every show. What am saying is, you should judge the anime based on it's own merits, what it brings to the table. You shouldn't think an anime will definitely be trash just because the source material wasn't that great. There's shows that are better than their source, and worse. You can't tell which this will be until you actually watch it. If I told you that your favorite show was trash because the it's source was, you'd be fine with that? That's the logic you're presenting here. Why does this bother you so much? |
May 15, 2017 8:39 PM
#40
Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Or I could just not waste my time in the first place. As for calling my favourite anime trash, who gives a crap? Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: "It's not the same!" Do you even know how adaptations work? It seems like you're discarding logic for emotion now. The anime is going to definitely work like a commercial for the manga. Don't be surprised when it just suddenly ends on a cliff hanger and NEVER gets a season 2. How have you seen 300ish anime and not noticed this? Syrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Are you blind? We have the manga to judge the source, and we have the studio, and we have the voice actors. If you're seriously unable to make a decision based on that, uninstallSyrup- said: Kittens-kun said: Syrup- said: Art looks like garbage, voice actors are horribly generic, story looks standard, manga is still publishing Into the trash it goes! You're judging based on basically nothing, but ok. Can't wait to see you complain each week while watching, then score it a 1/10 when it ends. Seems to be the hot new thing to do in the MAL community. If you think those are basically nothing, you definitely need to improve your standards. Two PVs and a synopsis. Yeah, we really got a fucking gold mine here. brought to you by the studio that made masterpieces such as Terraformars, the Berserk anime, Sekkou Boys QED You're calling the adaptation you haven't seen trash though. It's a separate entity from the manga, just like every show. What am saying is, you should judge the anime based on it's own merits, what it brings to the table. You shouldn't think an anime will definitely be trash just because the source material wasn't that great. There's shows that are better than their source, and worse. You can't tell which this will be until you actually watch it. If I told you that your favorite show was trash because the it's source was, you'd be fine with that? That's the logic you're presenting here. Why does this bother you so much? It bothers me because I hate the elitist/hipster mentality where they think everything is shit, even if they've never seen it. Series get a bad rep that they probably don't deserve if enough people think like this. Just wait for it to come out, watch the first episode, and then decide. (even though I personally don't think one episode is enough) It's 20 minutes of your life, is that really too much? |
May 15, 2017 11:03 PM
#41
Those eyes....reminds me of the late 80s, 90s anime and manga ....... AND I WASN'T ALIVE DURING THAT TIME. PLEASE JAPAN, THAT"S PUSHING IT ALREADY! Think carefully, you're literally giving in to the joke about the asian race having small eyes. Eyes this big can definitely be put into the dictionary term "Irony" Cough, this could be a good story still. |
May 16, 2017 6:09 AM
#42
iKlariS said: You see those character designs and think of the 80s-90s? Wew. Those round, digital-looking eyes can only be found in some low-tier 2010s production (because Clannad's ones are rather trapezoids). And if it's only a matter of size they're always been rather big so...Those eyes....reminds me of the late 80s, 90s anime and manga ....... AND I WASN'T ALIVE DURING THAT TIME. |
May 16, 2017 10:59 PM
#43
May 18, 2017 12:33 PM
#44
Shiririin said: Yay finally though here i am, being apparently the only one thinking "hum and what about Nisaka?" I mean, Nisaka IS a main character, why not reveal his seiyuu along with the others? AND MORE IMPORTANTLY AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO THOUGHT THAT HERE Also I like Kana but im sad she doesnt voice my best girl, though i find Misaki pretty cute physically I don't know Ririna's seiyuu and Ryota Osaka will, once again, voice a nice guy, like, that boy never voices an evil character haha, i was quite sure he would get the role tbh I ant Nisaka to be voiced by Kimura Ryouhei just for the ship Exactly! Where is Nisaka?! I want to see him animated so much. I hope they won't cut his part in anime. I'm not sure if Ryohei is best choice for him (hmm maybe Matsuoka Yoshitsugu could go???), but yeah let's just give him there for ship. :D |
May 18, 2017 11:33 PM
#45
Woot KanaHana did it again. I'm always very intrigued when she will be playing the role this time. So Much Counterpart. :D The Art doesn't look bad cause the studio who's behind of this is Liden Films (Rokudenashi) |
-HippySnob-May 18, 2017 11:38 PM
May 19, 2017 9:45 AM
#46
Another Kuzu no Honkai lol |
May 19, 2017 3:50 PM
#47
gr8_nonsense said: Shiririin said: Yay finally though here i am, being apparently the only one thinking "hum and what about Nisaka?" I mean, Nisaka IS a main character, why not reveal his seiyuu along with the others? AND MORE IMPORTANTLY AM I THE ONLY ONE WHO THOUGHT THAT HERE Also I like Kana but im sad she doesnt voice my best girl, though i find Misaki pretty cute physically I don't know Ririna's seiyuu and Ryota Osaka will, once again, voice a nice guy, like, that boy never voices an evil character haha, i was quite sure he would get the role tbh I ant Nisaka to be voiced by Kimura Ryouhei just for the ship Exactly! Where is Nisaka?! I want to see him animated so much. I hope they won't cut his part in anime. I'm not sure if Ryohei is best choice for him (hmm maybe Matsuoka Yoshitsugu could go???), but yeah let's just give him there for ship. :D How could they even think about cutting his part?? I mean, he's a main character ;; and he's the best, and important and ALL mhh ye Matsuoka could voice him! Or maybe Uchiyama Kouki? to begin with, i wanted them to be Natsuki Hanae x Kouki Uchiyama =3= |
Jun 6, 2017 8:41 AM
#48
Yusuke Nisaka: Shinnosuke Tachibana OP: "Kanashii Ureshii (かなしいうれしい)" by Frederic (フレデリック) ED: "Can't you say" by Roys http://natalie.mu/comic/news/235735 |
I ♥ Two Syaorans from Tsubasa RESERVoir CHRoNiCLE and TRC!!! |
More topics from this board
» Manga 'Champignon no Majo' Receives TV Anime AdaptationVindstot - 2 hours ago |
1 |
by RobertBobert
»»
7 minutes ago |
|
» Staff, Cast of 'Mahou Shoujo Ikusei Keikaku: Restart' AnnouncedDatRandomDude - 1 hour ago |
1 |
by RobertBobert
»»
14 minutes ago |
|
» Web Manga 'Food Court de, Mata Ashita.' Gets TV Anime in 2025DatRandomDude - 2 hours ago |
1 |
by RobertBobert
»»
21 minutes ago |
|
» Second Season of '2.5-jigen no Ririsa' AnnouncedDatRandomDude - 5 hours ago |
1 |
by RobertBobert
»»
4 hours ago |
|
» 'Kono Manga ga Sugoi!' 2025 Rankings RevealedSnow - Yesterday |
15 |
by RobertBobert
»»
4 hours ago |