| They make me so angry my balls explode just thinking about them. |
 |
| I find them disgusting. Relationships ought to be between two persons and not between two and a half a bloody town. |
  “The most shameless thing in the world is political power that can be inherited regardless of ability or talent!” |
| A significant other (love+lust) and many fuck buddies (lust only) is the key to enlightenment. Then you bring back the spices you acquired to your significant other. |
 |
| I personally think that they should be illegal. |
 |
| Not for me, not my concern if others do it. |
<Insert clever quote> |
| That's a difficult question to answer, but open relationships are even worse. |
|
| not for me, but if both people consent it should be okay the only rules in a relationship are the ones the people involved decide i know a lesbian couple that's into this kinda stuff and it's pretty interesting |
| @Seiya, it's pretty much the same thing except you have a partner. And that's not a difficult question to answer for me. I value freedom and personal choice as long as your not going about hurting other people. So, of course I'm for casual sex being legal. I'd rather the country collapse than for the government to become that intrusive in people's sex lives. |
| Not a relationship, and is just an excuse for women to be sluts since the woman always has more to gain in this situation. |
 |
| wouldn't personally get into one, but who cares what others do - as long as both parties joined the relationship wanting an open relationship, and so it wasn't forced on them by the other |
AnimeFreak-San said: is this a male gender issure...human issue...mental illness perhaps? |
| I don't think I would personally participate in it since I have been conditioned to value such loyalty, but I can't say anything for certain. Attempts at long term monagamous relationships often fail or result in unhappiness anyway, as humans did not evolve to be in these relationships. Though, open relationships could lead to a loss of self control over your hedonistic tendencies and desire for instant gradification, if promoted on a large scale. It could be called a conundrum of sorts, maybe. People now are in short term monagamous relationships in an attempt at balance. Veronin said: Not a relationship, and is just an excuse for women to be sluts since the woman always has more to gain in this situation. That is the the simple boomer mentality. |
 I can see you |
Maneki-Mew said: I'd be very uncomfortable in an open relationship, if I know it's only about sex for them and more about hookups and one-night-stands. It's hard for me to deal with such people, especially on relationship-basis. If it's something serious and the other person isn't just occasionally sex, than I might be okay with it after the first "eeh" and try to learn to get to know the other person. Maybe I'd like them too in some ways. ;) Seiya said: I personally think that they should be illegal. Hi, dictatorship. Come on, that's on the level of these old grandmas, who stare out of the window all day long and get their nose into other people's business. I just don't like the idea of other people having "free will." |
|
| Not something I can ever imagine myself partaking in, and I don't care if other people do |
Seiya said: Maneki-Mew said: I'd be very uncomfortable in an open relationship, if I know it's only about sex for them and more about hookups and one-night-stands. It's hard for me to deal with such people, especially on relationship-basis. If it's something serious and the other person isn't just occasionally sex, than I might be okay with it after the first "eeh" and try to learn to get to know the other person. Maybe I'd like them too in some ways. ;) Hi, dictatorship. Come on, that's on the level of these old grandmas, who stare out of the window all day long and get their nose into other people's business. I just don't like the idea of other people having "free will." You do know that people still have free will even if you criminalize an act right? It's like saying Antarctica doesn't exist if you make it illegal for people to acknowledge its existence. smallpox said: i can see how open relationships would fit some people better. personally i think my ideal would be a relationship where my partner and i are romantically exclusive but sexually allowed to fool around (on our own or perhaps together). i don't care much about sexual fidelity - never had. but romantic fidelity is a big deal to me. I largely agree with this, although I never felt romantic attraction towards anyone. If I ever do however, I'd also want my partner and I to be romantically exclusive to each other. |
 |
Orhunaa said: You do know that people still have free will even if you criminalize an act right? It's like saying Antarctica doesn't exist if you make it illegal for people to acknowledge its existence.If I ever do however, I'd also want my partner and I to be romantically exclusive to each other. A person wouldn't have free will if they were in a relationship with me. |
|
| NOTHING. WRONG. WITH. IT. Also, my god, bunch of authoritarians wanting to control people's lives in this thread. |
| You are not your body, you are your brain, the "self" that emerges from within it. |
Seiya said: Orhunaa said: You do know that people still have free will even if you criminalize an act right? It's like saying Antarctica doesn't exist if you make it illegal for people to acknowledge its existence.If I ever do however, I'd also want my partner and I to be romantically exclusive to each other. A person wouldn't have free will if they were in a relationship with me. Free will (n): The ability to act at one's own discretion. i.e. you can't make it disappear. Unless you're planning to tie them up 24/7 or something, though I wouldn't put it past you. |
|
Seiya said: Then it's super simple to avoid your scheme: don't be a labelfag and simply say "But we're just friends who are having sex once in a while" and change nothing.That's a difficult question to answer, but open relationships are even worse. And that's exactly what everything related to "relationships" — including "open relationships" is: unadulterated labelfaggotry and that's why I can't take it seriously. "relationship culture" is the trifle of the man who cares more about what to call something than what that thing is. There's also the issue of "should infidelity be illegal?" — because if it's not then you can just say "We're not in an open relationship; we have strict rules against cheating; it just so happens that we constantly break these rules; but we're compassionate men of understanding and don't get angry about this... wink, wink." — it's all labelfaggotry and obsession with words, not their meaning. |
 It is obvious that "obscenity" is not a term capable of exact legal definition; in the practice of the courts, it means "anything that shocks the magistrate". — Bertrand Russell |
| If other people (not counting someone I was in a romantic/sexual relationship with) want to do it, it's none of my business...but I would never want to be in an open relationship. I wouldn't want the person I love having sex with random people. Most couples break up when that type of thing happens too, and it's because most people would feel betrayed. |
 |
| I see no problem with it. If people agree with it out of their own volition it's up to them how their relationship works. |
 Leading biologist Scott Pitnick said: The bigger your 'nads, the smaller your brains |
Bakchos said: I have more objections towards the man who makes an agreement that limits his freedom than the man that makes no such agreement.I see no problem with it. If people agree with it out of their own volition it's up to them how their relationship works. Obviously I have very little respect for men who surrender their freedom for the prize of control of the freedom of other men. It's not even surrendering freedom for something tangible like money, food, shelter, entertainment, no — it's surrendering one's freedom for the prize of being able to take the freedom of another man, all the while claiming this is because one loves the latter. The man who surrenders his freedoms I find hard to respect; the man who surrenders it for nothing more than to take it from others even less, That having been said — the man so concerned with useless labelfaggotry I of course also have little respect for. |
It is obvious that "obscenity" is not a term capable of exact legal definition; in the practice of the courts, it means "anything that shocks the magistrate". — Bertrand Russell |
| It's not something that sounds like it'd be good for me, but in general I've got no issues with them. Whatever makes them happy, it isn't going to affect my life any. Boring. Seems to be the majority opinion in this thread. HyperL said: NOTHING. WRONG. WITH. IT. Also, my god, bunch of authoritarians wanting to control people's lives in this thread. Moralfags are a plague Im westen nichts neues |
ManabanOct 4, 2019 4:29 PM
 |
Sphinxter said: I never felt romantically attracted to anyone, so I never took a man's freedom in such agreements. I'd rather go on with no relationships whatsoever. Even if I do not engage in such behaviors, the thread asks about the men that do and I entertained such possibilities for some fun. Bakchos said: I have more objections towards the man who makes an agreement that limits his freedom than the man that makes no such agreement.I see no problem with it. If people agree with it out of their own volition it's up to them how their relationship works. Obviously I have very little respect for men who surrender their freedom for the prize of control of the freedom of other men. It's not even surrendering freedom for something tangible like money, food, shelter, entertainment, no — it's surrendering one's freedom for the prize of being able to take the freedom of another man, all the while claiming this is because one loves the latter. The man who surrenders his freedoms I find hard to respect; the man who surrenders it for nothing more than to take it from others even less, That having been said — the man so concerned with useless labelfaggotry I of course also have little respect for. |
Leading biologist Scott Pitnick said: The bigger your 'nads, the smaller your brains |
Scud said: They make me so angry my balls explode just thinking about them. I actually cracked up at this comment. Burnt_Cookie said: Knowing myself, I'd prefer an open relationship over a monogamous one, and wouldn't settle for anything else. Unlike some people, I'd actually make it clear that I would want something like that at the start. This has nothing to do with your comment but holy fuck that girl in your signature's position is hot. Can you imagine coming home and seeing your girlfriend laying in your bed in a miniskirt like that lol. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
| I know people in long-term open relationships and I see how functional and healthy they can be. I'm not the jealous or the possessive type, which makes me think it could work out for me. I was never into one, but I'd be open (heh) to it if the possibility arose, but it's not something I'm seeking out though. |
KosmonautOct 4, 2019 5:38 PM
 |
| They're not for me at all. If i had a partner i'd want them all to myself! >:3 Just thinking about someone i love going off with other girls makes me sad, so i'd never ever ever have an open relationship. I'd want it closed, just the two of us together. |
| It seems quite interesting, not sure if I'd be able to be in one though. |
| I guess everyone will have their own opinions and disagree on the basis of it. But I actually don't understand it at all. An open relationship is not a relationship at all imo. I just don't understand why you have to be together with someone, while seeking sex and thrill from other people. You can simply seek out all the thrill and sex without one, and with less headaches. To me it's just one of the most selfish behaviors ever. You don't NEED to be with someone, even if you have kids, if you're not getting what you want out of it. A relationship to me is a commitment. A commitment that you are making with another person. If you're going to include a third party or several third parties, then it really loses that intimacy, it loses the factor of having something special with someone. It's kinda like "i'm just with you because I CAN'T walk away but I want to bang other people because you don't excite me anymore". I don't really care what people do with lives, but for me it's more of a issue with finding the purpose of it. You can just be single if you want to not be tied down and seek "freedom". |
| There is virtually nobody who an open relationship would actually work for in the long term. |
| It depends on what you consider an open relationship. I have my hand in multiple women and have some form emotional connection with each one as they do with me. Them and I care for each other and if any of them ask for my help I'll help and vise versa. I go on dates with most of them and be genuinely intimate with them. Does that mean I'm in multiple open relationships? I wouldn't say so but maybe that's what you would call it ps just in case. no, none of these women think im just with them and I dont expect them to just be with me. |
| if everyone involved is consenting, and they can make it work, then good for them! |
 It’s okay to look back at the past, just don’t stare too long |
| It's the pinnacle of maturity that most people here are not ready for. It works even better if only one of the participants is allowed to have multiple partners while the other stays loyal and supports their partner both morally and financially in their pursuit of pleasure and happiness with other people. |
| open relationship is okay-ish for me as long as it's not orgy. cuz i think it's a good thing to be able to emotionally connected with many people so we can understand each other better and prevent conflicts from happen. |
 |
More topics from this board
» Weirdest moviespaceslut - Sep 18, 2022 |
33 |
by Hikinekomori
»»
57 seconds ago |
|
» Your Top 3 non-anime movies60D - Mar 10, 2021 |
10 |
by NoelleIsSleepy
»»
7 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » Do you guys actually read the comments on the threads heretsukareru - May 11 |
24 |
by Hikinekomori
»»
8 minutes ago |
|
» Whats's your favourite snack food?Towaii7 - Mar 22 |
33 |
by Serafos
»»
8 minutes ago |
|
» How much soda do you drink in a week?HunteerX - Today |
30 |
by NoelleIsSleepy
»»
28 minutes ago |