| what the fuck is the point in owning that shit anyway? just look it up online and get rid of so much of the risk |
Immahnoob said: Jizzy, I know you have no idea how to argue for shit, tokiyashiro said: Jizzy as you would call yourself because youre a dick The most butthurt award goes to you And clearly you havent watched that many shows thats why you cant determine if a show is unique or not Or maybe you're just a child who likes common stuffs where hero saves the day and guys gets all the girls. Sad taste you have there kid you came up to me in the first place making you look more like a kid who got slapped without me even knowing it and start crying about it to me |
DJIzzyIzzyHitler said: What if you go somewhere that doesn't have internet, like an airport, a train station, a restauran-what the fuck is the point in owning that shit anyway? just look it up online and get rid of so much of the risk Oh, wait. |
やがて気づく本当の気持ちは そして 人間が大好きでした |
DJIzzyIzzyHitler said: what the fuck is the point in owning that shit anyway? just look it up online and get rid of so much of the risk The risk of it disappearing off the site you found it on. I only have like one of those kind of comics on my pc(secret flowers I, II and III), but thats because I prefer having access to them at all times, in case the sites it gets hosted on gets taken down. |
rederoinOct 18, 2012 12:15 PM
| The wife deserves an extra hot corner in hell, that's for sure. If she was that horrified by the pictures she should have confronted (preferably talked to) her husband first, and if she couldn't accept it, she could have left him. But to rat on him like that when he wasn't hurting anyone, and there was no evidence of him doing anything with real children? That's uncalled for and harsh. Amberleh said: Pedophile is a sexual orientation. A Child Molester is one who goes out and rapes children and is often also a pedophile, just as I am a heterosexual or someone is a homosexual. Huh? That makes no sense at all, rather paedophilia is a (perverted) age preference. JavierR said: It's not the games that make people crazy, they were crazy to begin with. I don't think a sane person would play GTA and then go outside wanting to shoot cops. This, or they were weak-minded and easily influenced by external factors. Idiots, in other words. |
Helladank said: One guy comes to mind. Madthad. Thad had shit tons of real CP and gloated about it on facebook on a daily basis (as well as told people how to get it, or so the docket says), he was a legitimate pedophile. The doujin was just a side note in the case to the real stuff. Same goes for that Handley guy, he had real CP and the drawn material was only treated as an extra rather than the main thing in the case. |
 |
rederoin said: how many times do you need to fap to the same material? just saying.DJIzzyIzzyHitler said: what the fuck is the point in owning that shit anyway? just look it up online and get rid of so much of the risk The risk of it disappearing off the site you found it on. I only have like one of those kind of comics on my pc(secret flowers I, II and III), but thats because I prefer having access to them at all times, in case the sites it gets hosted on gets taken down. |
Immahnoob said: Jizzy, I know you have no idea how to argue for shit, tokiyashiro said: Jizzy as you would call yourself because youre a dick The most butthurt award goes to you And clearly you havent watched that many shows thats why you cant determine if a show is unique or not Or maybe you're just a child who likes common stuffs where hero saves the day and guys gets all the girls. Sad taste you have there kid you came up to me in the first place making you look more like a kid who got slapped without me even knowing it and start crying about it to me |
TallonKarrde23 said: how long is that guy gonna be locked up anyway?Helladank said: One guy comes to mind. Madthad. Thad had shit tons of real CP and gloated about it on facebook on a daily basis (as well as told people how to get it, or so the docket says), he was a legitimate pedophile. The doujin was just a side note in the case to the real stuff. edit: oh shit that guy has a mal account http://myanimelist.net/profile/madthad0890 |
Immahnoob said: Jizzy, I know you have no idea how to argue for shit, tokiyashiro said: Jizzy as you would call yourself because youre a dick The most butthurt award goes to you And clearly you havent watched that many shows thats why you cant determine if a show is unique or not Or maybe you're just a child who likes common stuffs where hero saves the day and guys gets all the girls. Sad taste you have there kid you came up to me in the first place making you look more like a kid who got slapped without me even knowing it and start crying about it to me |
DJIzzyIzzyHitler said: how long is that guy gonna be locked up anyway? edit: oh shit that guy has a mal account http://myanimelist.net/profile/madthad0890 I'm not sure what happened with his case in the end, I know he got out on bail but I think he did something to make them bring him back in - and then that's when I stopped hearing about it. I never really followed it, it was just unavoidable as when shit got real people were posting about it all the time in some places, I'm sure if you look it up you could find more details on what's going on with him now easy. |
|
theirony said: So should we ban everything that depicts any sort of criminal activity in a non-negative light?I believe anime carries opinion that lolicon in OK. You can't hide behind camera or drawn picture and promote child pornography and abuse, it is not an art - it's a crime. Man, I sure love me some thought police. |
やがて気づく本当の気持ちは そして 人間が大好きでした |
DJIzzyIzzyHitler said: rederoin said: how many times do you need to fap to the same material? just saying.DJIzzyIzzyHitler said: what the fuck is the point in owning that shit anyway? just look it up online and get rid of so much of the risk The risk of it disappearing off the site you found it on. I only have like one of those kind of comics on my pc(secret flowers I, II and III), but thats because I prefer having access to them at all times, in case the sites it gets hosted on gets taken down. Its not fap material though, just my favourite doujins(that happens be porn, although thats not the reason). But that was a bad example, I do have an encrypted USB drive with a bunch of extremely hard to find doujins on them, some of which have nudity/erotica. And by hard to find, I mean that I couldn't find them outside of of 4chan, no matter how hard I looked. Its more of a collection than anything. So what it boils down too, some doujins can't be found anywhere, thus its better to just safe them to an encrypted USB. |
rederoin said: And by hard to find, I mean that I couldn't find them outside of of 4chan, no matter how hard I looked. Its more of a collection than anything. So what it boils down too, some doujins can't be found anywhere, thus its better to just safe them to an encrypted USB. Almost everything you could find on 4chan is on exhentai. |
|
Allecto said: The wife deserves an extra hot corner in hell, that's for sure. If she was that horrified by the pictures she should have confronted (preferably talked to) her husband first, and if she couldn't accept it, she could have left him. But to rat on him like that when he wasn't hurting anyone, and there was no evidence of him doing anything with real children? That's uncalled for and harsh. Amberleh said: Pedophile is a sexual orientation. A Child Molester is one who goes out and rapes children and is often also a pedophile, just as I am a heterosexual or someone is a homosexual. Huh? That makes no sense at all, rather paedophilia is a (perverted) age preference. JavierR said: It's not the games that make people crazy, they were crazy to begin with. I don't think a sane person would play GTA and then go outside wanting to shoot cops. This, or they were weak-minded and easily influenced by external factors. Idiots, in other words. Pedophilia is a sexual orientation. An actual pedophile is sexually attracted to ONLY children, just as a homosexual man is only attracted to men, a bisexual woman is attracted to both genders, a heterosexual woman is only attracted to men, etc. I assume you are a heterosexual man- Sexually, you are only attracted to women, correct? The same goes for these guys (and sometimes women). They aren't sexually attracted to a mature woman and they, unfortunately, cannot help that. I'm not saying "poor baby', but the ones who suppress their desires are to be pitied. It is genuinely something they cannot fix, just as you can't fix being straight. People can experiment and force themselves to be with someone they are not sexually attracted to, but it does not change who they are. There are a lot of people who are, technically, pedophiles out there but are ONLY pedophiles- Not child mollesters. A child mollestar is someone, usually a pedophile, who acts upon his or her desires and abuses a child sexually. A pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to children but may or may not act upon this. Dictionary.com: child molester noun a man (or woman) who has sex (usually sodomy) with a boy or girl as the passive partner [syn: pederast] paedophile or esp ( US ) pedophile (ˈpiːdəʊˌfaɪl) — n a person who is sexually attracted to children Wikipedia: As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder in persons who are 16 years of age or older typically characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children (generally age 13 years or younger, though onset of puberty varies). The prepubescent child must be at least five years younger than the adolescent before the attraction can be diagnosed as pedophilia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophile I invite you all to read the whole article. If nothing else, it is at the very least interesting. And yes, I have done quite a bit of research on pedophilia over the years, mostly to defend homosexuals when people try to make the argument that homosexuals should not be allowed to have children because they are 'more likely to abuse them sexually' (not true, obviously.) I am no expert, but I do know more than the average person. |
AmberlehOct 18, 2012 1:06 PM
Amberleh said: Blah blah blah... Wow, so Wiki is your fountain of knowledge then? Good luck with that. Look up "sexual orientation" and stop getting age preferences mixed up with gender preferences. |
Allecto said: Amberleh said: Blah blah blah... Wow, so Wiki is your fountain of knowledge then? Good luck with that. Look up "sexual orientation" and stop getting age preferences mixed up with gender preferences. No, I have done research and written papers on it and you know, you aren't allowed to cite Wiki as a reference in those. But for the masses, Wiki works just fine as I don't think you or most others on this thread are going to read through 10 scholarly articles on the subject. I also suspect you didn't even read any of what I posed. You just saw "wiki' and automatically assumed it was BS. |
Amberleh said: No, I have done research and written papers on it and you know, you aren't allowed to cite Wiki as a reference in those. You could just reference the articles wiki references though. |
|
TallonKarrde23 said: Amberleh said: No, I have done research and written papers on it and you know, you aren't allowed to cite Wiki as a reference in those. You could just reference the articles wiki references though. I could, but like I said, none of you are going to read through 10 scholarly articles that I link. Wiki is the fast all-encompassing way to get the information out. |
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_orientation Paedophilia is not listed under here, nor any dictionaries. I agree that Pedophilia is ultimately not a choice, or is the result of underlying issues as a kid, and there's a few things backing that up (and a few cases where random attraction seemingly came out of nowhere due to medical problems). However that does not mean that it falls under "sexual orientation". If you're going to say it is, you might as well call Bestiality a sexual orientation while you're at it. Sexual Orientation applies to gender/sex. Not that these silly definitions are relevant to the thread anyway. |
TrapaliciousOct 18, 2012 1:33 PM
Amberleh said: TallonKarrde23 said: Amberleh said: No, I have done research and written papers on it and you know, you aren't allowed to cite Wiki as a reference in those. You could just reference the articles wiki references though. I could, but like I said, none of you are going to read through 10 scholarly articles that I link. Wiki is the fast all-encompassing way to get the information out. And lets be honest many like to bash wiki but educators and scholars made researches and they found it no less accurate than any published source of information and encyclopedia. You can doubt the work of the scientist that came to that conclusion if you like but doubting the word of Wikipedia that they actually did come to that conclusion is actually kind of stupid since in the very vast majority the information are actually accurate and the users just like to make it sound like it's full of mistakes simply because a mistake makes more noise when you are like the library of the internet instead of just a book on bookshelf. |
Monad said: Amberleh said: TallonKarrde23 said: Amberleh said: No, I have done research and written papers on it and you know, you aren't allowed to cite Wiki as a reference in those. You could just reference the articles wiki references though. I could, but like I said, none of you are going to read through 10 scholarly articles that I link. Wiki is the fast all-encompassing way to get the information out. And lets be honest many like to bash wiki but educators and scholars made researches and they found it no less accurate than any published source of information and encyclopedia. You can doubt the work of the scientist that came to that conclusion if you like but doubting the word of Wikipedia that they actually did come to that conclusion is actually kind of stupid since in the very vast majority the information are actually accurate and the users just like to make it sound like it's full of mistakes simply because a mistake makes more noise when you are like the library of the internet instead of just a book on bookshelf. Thank you for that, it's appreciated. =) |
Amberleh said: TallonKarrde23 said: Amberleh said: No, I have done research and written papers on it and you know, you aren't allowed to cite Wiki as a reference in those. You could just reference the articles wiki references though. I could, but like I said, none of you are going to read through 10 scholarly articles that I link. Wiki is the fast all-encompassing way to get the information out. I don't disagree, I was just making a side note to that one part of your post. It was more me complaining about how people and places still don't accept wikipedia as a valid source for some reason - especially when you could just cite the wiki sources and still actually only look at wikipedia. |
|
| This is not a pedo case nor a loli case (which probably doesn't exist) It's the powerful anti-obscene law, which include many different sex themes, involvement of children is just one of them. It's the same in Japan. The difference is whether a case is brought up to the court or not. If no one report it, then it's quiet. If someone bring a case to prosecutor, you will have a new article to discuss. |
bottleOct 18, 2012 2:14 PM
TallonKarrde23 said: Amberleh said: TallonKarrde23 said: Amberleh said: No, I have done research and written papers on it and you know, you aren't allowed to cite Wiki as a reference in those. You could just reference the articles wiki references though. I could, but like I said, none of you are going to read through 10 scholarly articles that I link. Wiki is the fast all-encompassing way to get the information out. I don't disagree, I was just making a side note to that one part of your post. It was more me complaining about how people and places still don't accept wikipedia as a valid source for some reason - especially when you could just cite the wiki sources and still actually only look at wikipedia. Ah I understand, I thought that might be the case. Thank you then. =) |
| We had so many threads/discussions about this, can we stop it already? If you have hard time distinguishing reality from fantasy, then why aren't you saying that murdering, torturing in video games is as bad and should be punished? To me it seems that people are taking this stuff too personal or have been molested by Catholic Priest. Do you have any evidence, which shows the connection between being sexually attracted to fictional characters with unrealistic body-types and paedophilia? And I would argue that actual paedophiles wouldn't give a crap about lolicon, because they want the real deal. |
| LUL |
TallonKarrde23 said: This is false, Christopher Handley never had any child porn. You're thinking of Dwight Whorley or someone else.Same goes for that Handley guy, he had real CP and the drawn material was only treated as an extra rather than the main thing in the case. |
  |
Gogetters said: TallonKarrde23 said: This is false, Christopher Handley never had any child porn. You're thinking of Dwight Whorley or someone else.Same goes for that Handley guy, he had real CP and the drawn material was only treated as an extra rather than the main thing in the case. My mistake then, I get all these guys confused aside Thad because Thad was hilarious with all his crazy pics with his waifu and shit. |
|
| Gotta love TrueCrypt. |
كنت تهدر وقتك عن طريق ترجمة هذه. mattbenz99 said: Christians and Satanists are technically the same thing |
Jay_Ox said: The guy was an idiot for pleading guilty too. He should have gotten a lawyer. So far as I'm aware it's not "truly" illegal and the only reason this guy is in so much trouble is because he basically bent over and let the prosecution go to town on him. Perhaps they scared him with a plea deal, a tactic that I think entices men to gamble away their freedom out of fear of stricter punishment. We live in a society where people are conditioned to have an extremely negative reaction to this stuff. Rather than thinking objectively about it they react from an emotional standpoint. As a result this harmless fetish is lent a weight equal to that of a real crime. While the laws on this are still in a gray area the safest thing is to avoid having stuff like this on your computer. ^That, and he probably should have chosen a better wife, if she's just going to jail him for something like a fetish. |
June93 said: How unexpected, why can't people live freely and enjoy themselves? If people freely enjoyed themselves fully nobody would enjoy anything because everyone would be doing what they want without considering others and would be doing so at the expense of others. This would be the downfall of society and mankind, because nobody would work - why bother when you can just take what you want? And then things you want will cease to exist because nobody makes them and yours are stolen, so now what? Plus, there'd be rampant rape and murder, you cant enjoy much if you're being plowed by big burly men against your will constantly or if you're dead. And so on and so forth. I'm not arguing one way or the other, but just saying, "freedom" has to have limits. I'm not saying what those limits should be though. |
TallonKarrde23Oct 18, 2012 3:28 PM
|
| Agreed, Tallon. Complete "freedom" is a scary thought, although it's pretty well impossible to even imagine such a world. |
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
| Boy, now I'm paranoid....started to delete my entire browsing history and making sure I don't have anything "obscene" on my HD. I fucking hate our government so fucking much! |
| I think it's a bit of a leap to say that the removal of murder, for example, as a punishable offence would suddenly inextricably lead to mass murder on a national scale daily, but I agree with the thrust of the point. I should say though, in mitigation for June93, that they was referring to the specific case in them (i.e. looking at pictures), so your response does seem a bit OTT. |
 |
JustALEX said: Just make sure your wife doesn't call the cops on you.Boy, now I'm paranoid....started to delete my entire browsing history and making sure I don't have anything "obscene" on my HD. I fucking hate our government so fucking much! |
やがて気づく本当の気持ちは そして 人間が大好きでした |
JustALEX said: Boy, now I'm paranoid....started to delete my entire browsing history and making sure I don't have anything "obscene" on my HD. I fucking hate our government so fucking much! lol |
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
| be careful who you marry for sure |
| ~"The place to improve the world is first in one's own heart and head and hands." (Pirsig) |
Amberleh said: Assuming they are depicted as cartoons, who's being harmed? What about erotic text stories? "Oh noes someone's intangible mental image of nonexistent children is being victimized!"Liking small children, whether depicted as cartoons or not, is by no means a 'harmless fetish'. Many anime fans are starting to become a bit too lax about the lolicon thing- Whether they are cartoons or not, you are still enjoying and getting off on small children being violated. And please don't give me the 'well it's usually the kid coming onto the adult' excuse- You know very well that that is there just so they can say "SEE IT'S OKAY". As stated in the news story, not all such material depicts (fictional) children having sex with (fictional) adults. What about children having sex with other children? Are they somehow violating the other and being violated themselves at the same time? (Sadly, some IRL cases have ruled this way, in America's ongoing quest to criminalize adolescent sexuality. )I believe lolicon should be, technically, a safe release for REAL pedophiles who unfortunately cannot help their sexual attraction to children as they were either born with it or it developed early in life. Random people who are not actually pedophiles enjoying these OVAs or doujins or whatever makes a mockery of the people who live with this illness and do not act on it . Somehow, I doubt actual pedophiles have telepathic alarm systems that tell them "Some random non-pedophile is fapping to loli eromanga, I'm being mocked!"Pedo reads loli/shota material and doesn't act out against real children = no real children harmed. Non-pedo reads loli/shota material and doesn't act out against real children (not that they'd want to anyway, by definition) = no real children harmed. No harm either way, what's the difference? |
shairn said: Just make sure your wife doesn't call the cops on you. Thankfully, I don't have to worry about that.... |
rederoin said: i sometimes forget doujin means fan made interpretation of existing worlds and characters, thats mainly cause 90% of its pornDJIzzyIzzyHitler said: rederoin said: how many times do you need to fap to the same material? just saying.DJIzzyIzzyHitler said: what the fuck is the point in owning that shit anyway? just look it up online and get rid of so much of the risk The risk of it disappearing off the site you found it on. I only have like one of those kind of comics on my pc(secret flowers I, II and III), but thats because I prefer having access to them at all times, in case the sites it gets hosted on gets taken down. Its not fap material though, just my favourite doujins(that happens be porn, although thats not the reason). But that was a bad example, I do have an encrypted USB drive with a bunch of extremely hard to find doujins on them, some of which have nudity/erotica. And by hard to find, I mean that I couldn't find them outside of of 4chan, no matter how hard I looked. Its more of a collection than anything. So what it boils down too, some doujins can't be found anywhere, thus its better to just safe them to an encrypted USB. |
Immahnoob said: Jizzy, I know you have no idea how to argue for shit, tokiyashiro said: Jizzy as you would call yourself because youre a dick The most butthurt award goes to you And clearly you havent watched that many shows thats why you cant determine if a show is unique or not Or maybe you're just a child who likes common stuffs where hero saves the day and guys gets all the girls. Sad taste you have there kid you came up to me in the first place making you look more like a kid who got slapped without me even knowing it and start crying about it to me |
| As long as no ones rights are violated, you should be able to have as much creepy and 'obscene’ crap as you want. Amberleh said: Oh noes! You shouldn't enjoy something you enjoy because you're somehow mocking someone in the world.Random people who are not actually pedophiles enjoying these OVAs or doujins or whatever makes a mockery of the people who live with this illness and do not act on it . |
|
DJIzzyIzzyHitler said: rederoin said: i sometimes forget doujin means fan made interpretation of existing worlds and characters, thats mainly cause 90% of its pornDJIzzyIzzyHitler said: rederoin said: how many times do you need to fap to the same material? just saying.DJIzzyIzzyHitler said: what the fuck is the point in owning that shit anyway? just look it up online and get rid of so much of the risk The risk of it disappearing off the site you found it on. I only have like one of those kind of comics on my pc(secret flowers I, II and III), but thats because I prefer having access to them at all times, in case the sites it gets hosted on gets taken down. Its not fap material though, just my favourite doujins(that happens be porn, although thats not the reason). But that was a bad example, I do have an encrypted USB drive with a bunch of extremely hard to find doujins on them, some of which have nudity/erotica. And by hard to find, I mean that I couldn't find them outside of of 4chan, no matter how hard I looked. Its more of a collection than anything. So what it boils down too, some doujins can't be found anywhere, thus its better to just safe them to an encrypted USB. Some series actually have a ton of non-H doujins, Yuru yuri for example. |
rederoinOct 18, 2012 4:07 PM
Amberleh said: Pedophilia is a sexual orientation. An actual pedophile is sexually attracted to ONLY children, just as a homosexual man is only attracted to men, a bisexual woman is attracted to both genders, a heterosexual woman is only attracted to men, etc. I assume you are a heterosexual man- Sexually, you are only attracted to women, correct? The same goes for these guys (and sometimes women). They aren't sexually attracted to a mature woman and they, unfortunately, cannot help that. I'm not saying "poor baby', but the ones who suppress their desires are to be pitied. It is genuinely something they cannot fix, just as you can't fix being straight. People can experiment and force themselves to be with someone they are not sexually attracted to, but it does not change who they are. There are a lot of people who are, technically, pedophiles out there but are ONLY pedophiles- Not child mollesters. A child mollestar is someone, usually a pedophile, who acts upon his or her desires and abuses a child sexually. A pedophile is someone who is sexually attracted to children but may or may not act upon this. So if you're sexually attracted to some thing then it's a sexual orientation? so every from Feet to Cars have their own sexual orientation now? |
| It doesn't think, it doesn't feel, it doesn't laugh or cry..... All it does from dusk till dawn is make the soldiers die. |
 ^She is over 500 years-old. I guess every hentai doujinshi about her is pretty fucking legal. |
| I definitely have superpowers. I can feel it in my balls. |
Karhu said: 500 years-old. Jail bait bro, don't fall for it. |
كنت تهدر وقتك عن طريق ترجمة هذه. mattbenz99 said: Christians and Satanists are technically the same thing |
| I hope its loli hentai and not real child pornography... |
| Delete after use, you won't miss it. |
 Behold of my awesomeness~ controversial and/or sensitive topics likely devolve into the same repetitive, derogatory, abusive, and harassing comments can no longer be posted. But my feels. |
rederoin said: a show about a bunch of lesbians doing cute things, i find it hard to believe people havent jumped over the porn boat to that, at otakon this year me and the rest of my friends always split up in the dealers room and our meta up spot was the only store that stood out.....the hentai booth, and there was just a shit ton of madoka lesbo porn and yuru yuri lesbo porn right on the front , im pretty sure it gets alot thatt stuff.DJIzzyIzzyHitler said: rederoin said: i sometimes forget doujin means fan made interpretation of existing worlds and characters, thats mainly cause 90% of its pornDJIzzyIzzyHitler said: rederoin said: how many times do you need to fap to the same material? just saying.DJIzzyIzzyHitler said: what the fuck is the point in owning that shit anyway? just look it up online and get rid of so much of the risk The risk of it disappearing off the site you found it on. I only have like one of those kind of comics on my pc(secret flowers I, II and III), but thats because I prefer having access to them at all times, in case the sites it gets hosted on gets taken down. Its not fap material though, just my favourite doujins(that happens be porn, although thats not the reason). But that was a bad example, I do have an encrypted USB drive with a bunch of extremely hard to find doujins on them, some of which have nudity/erotica. And by hard to find, I mean that I couldn't find them outside of of 4chan, no matter how hard I looked. Its more of a collection than anything. So what it boils down too, some doujins can't be found anywhere, thus its better to just safe them to an encrypted USB. Some series actually have a ton of non-H doujins, Yuru yuri for example. |
Immahnoob said: Jizzy, I know you have no idea how to argue for shit, tokiyashiro said: Jizzy as you would call yourself because youre a dick The most butthurt award goes to you And clearly you havent watched that many shows thats why you cant determine if a show is unique or not Or maybe you're just a child who likes common stuffs where hero saves the day and guys gets all the girls. Sad taste you have there kid you came up to me in the first place making you look more like a kid who got slapped without me even knowing it and start crying about it to me |
| As a child, I was told that society is a melting pot of talents; knowledge and experience combined to form important alloys that will contribute to mankind. When I got to highschool, however, I thought that it's more like a river in which the water represents our peers while we ourselves are the stones in the river. Constant erosion by mindless majority sheeping has made us lose our unique edge. After I hit the age of 18, I realized that I've been wrong all along. Society is no melting pot. Society is no river. Society is a person, a very skilled rapist, and he has fucked us all. |
| Well this is why otakus should never getting married. Since we won't have to worry about your stuid wives getting jealous over our hentai collection. |
| ❑ Single ❑ Taken ✔ Mentally dating a character that doesn't actually exist |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
272 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |