JustALEX said: Oh and I suppose the ENTIRE Left is, right? Oh wait...no...that's just retarded SJWs that you people seem to think is representative of the entire left side of the political spectrum. Oh and you might want to ask CONSERVATIVES what they think about free speech when it comes to allowing people with controversial comments speak at their events. You mean when left didn't allow Milo Yiannopoulos( a conservative) to speak at Berkeley? People like you who attack the opposite side for trying to bring up problems today are the biggest problem. Why don't you attack the left instead who has insane problems taking any reality check? |
NiBer said: Yomiyuki said: don't think he was talking about sweden i would hope no one here is delusional enough to defend the mass exodus of immigrants to sweden. don't think he was talking about topic at all, deserved no response, I gave him one. You're delusional if you think Sweden should accept so many, no, in fact, any immigrants. Sweden is not the babysitter of the world. Let your own damn country take care of you, not Europe and America. Work on your own country, and stop derailing my topic. what the fuck are you talking about, can you even read? where in my post did i mention anything about wanting sweden to accept immigrants? |
 Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
NiBer said: JustALEX said: Oh and I suppose the ENTIRE Left is, right? Oh wait...no...that's just retarded SJWs that you people seem to think is representative of the entire left side of the political spectrum. Oh and you might want to ask CONSERVATIVES what they think about free speech when it comes to allowing people with controversial comments speak at their events. You mean when left didn't allow Milo Yiannopoulos( a conservative) to speak at Berkeley? People like you who attack the opposite side for trying to bring up problems today are the biggest problem. Why don't you attack the left instead who has insane problems taking any reality check? Uh...actually you got it ALL WRONG! Berkeley DID allow Milo to speak....just like MANY other "liberal" University They ultimately cancelled his event because of the riots. If you want to blame anyone....blame the retarded rioters! Berkeley along with MANY universities that Milo went to....ALLOWED him to have his faggot ass in there. And you have me mistaken with someone else. Unlike many of YOU people (Right-wingers) I attack BOTH sides....not just one. Unlike YOU people...I'm not afraid to attack people who have similar ideals to me when they do something retarded. |
JustALEX said: NiBer said: You mean when left didn't allow Milo Yiannopoulos( a conservative) to speak at Berkeley? People like you who attack the opposite side for trying to bring up problems today are the biggest problem. Why don't you attack the left instead who has insane problems taking any reality check? Uh...actually you got it ALL WRONG! Berkeley DID allow Milo to speak....just like MANY other "liberal" University They ultimately cancelled his event because of the riots. If you want to blame anyone....blame the retarded rioters! Berkeley along with MANY universities that Milo went to....ALLOWED him to have his faggot ass in there. And you have me mistaken with someone else. Unlike many of YOU people (Right-wingers) I attack BOTH sides....not just one. Unlike YOU people...I'm not afraid to attack people who have similar ideals to me when they do something retarded. You mean whenever he has a speech he's being protested constantly? See, again. you're attacking the side being attacked instead of the attackers. Shame on you. You attacking right wingers today is like people attacking jews in nazi germany, it's easy to do and everyone else is doing it. Utter shame on your part. Wake up cuck. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IawEMxTroBk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TxL_bf7wetE |
Yomiyuki said: what the fuck are you talking about, can you even read? where in my post did i mention anything about wanting sweden to accept immigrants? ErwinJA said: Zeally said: This is really just propaganda, as its purpose is not to educate, but obfuscate. Immigrants actually commit less crimes than native borns well at least in America. It's not even close Yet people are suddenly so afraid of immigrants because they saw one incident on TV/news then some how extrapolate to the conclusion that immigrants are destroying their country.  If we're questioning the threat posed, relative percentages of criminality are more important than share of the total. Considering the portion of the population that are citizens, it would be absurd for the citizens to not vastly outstrip non-citizens. So, what we really want to know is whether the non-citizen share of crime is higher than its share of the population. If it is, they are, on average, more dangerous than citizens. If not, they are, individually, less of a threat. It's that simple. Now, about 14% of the US population was born a non-citizen. That might suggest that are magic number is 86%, but . . . it's not. Why? Half of those are naturalized citizens. See the chart? Yeah, an immigrant who attains citizenship will be moved to the "citizen" class. So, if we see an area where citizens don't make up at least 93% of the total, that means a non-citizen immigrant is, relatively speaking (and in aggregate!) more dangerous. Several dominoes have fallen. And, of course, there are other issues as well. There are several communities - most famously black, but also other minorities with high portions of immigrants, that protect their criminals for various reasons. This goes beyond just refusing to cooperate, but even juries acquitting on what should be open-and-shut cases. This chart has the obvious flaw in that it only follows convictions. That means anyone who got away with it doesn't count. This could, of course, go for or against either side - we don't know. Now, overall, I don't see much difference - most of the numbers are either within the margin of error, or balanced out by other figures that go the other way. Compared to citizens, non-citizens are not particularly more dangerous. Of course, looking at this thread title, there is an elephant in the room. A single (non-white) segment of the US population makes up a disproportional share of several of these crimes. Remove it, and the criminality rate for white citizens is significantly lower than for immigrants overall. At that point, however, we might as well start parsing immigrant populations as well, where we'll see the same trends - certain groups make up a disproportional share of the total crimes. And only at that point do we have anything that's even arguably useful and arguably not propaganda. Stop derailing my topic. |
| Depends on where you draw the line for what anti-white propaganda is. If something is explicitly hateful against the white race, then of course it's anti-white. But things such as commercials featuring mixed race couples, showing whites as villains in movies, or any trivial pop culture thing like that that many of the alt-right complain about, I don't really think it is unless again, it's spreading a message of hate against white people. As for politics, that's a different matter. Different people have different reasons for supporting the same thing. Not all people who voted from Trump are racists, not everyone who supports immigration is anti-white. If racists or SJWs want to throw in a racial narrative to support their platform or to discredit others, it's up to the individual to decide whether he believes it or not but staying out of the race issue is also an option because politics is much more than "liberals hate white males" or "Trump hates all minorities". When it comes to politics, I'm pretty much saying, just think for yourself. Well, that's how I see it at least. |
| @NiBer learn to use the edit button please, because 5 posts in a row is way too much. OT: It goes both ways, but it's pretty easy to ignore half the context to write shit like this thread. I think it's a bit more complex than "whites/blacks are evil", but that probably makes me a libtard cuck SJW for you :-3. |
 |
Clebardman said: @NiBer learn to use the edit button please, because 5 posts in a row is way too much. OT: It goes both ways, but it's pretty easy to ignore half the context to write shit like this thread. I think it's a bit more complex than "whites/blacks are evil", but that probably makes me a libtard cuck SJW for you :-3. Responding to each individual. Elaborate. Be specific. |
| Damn traitors we should have all their heads. |
 |
NiBer said: Yomiyuki said: what the fuck are you talking about, can you even read? where in my post did i mention anything about wanting sweden to accept immigrants? ErwinJA said: This is really just propaganda, as its purpose is not to educate, but obfuscate. If we're questioning the threat posed, relative percentages of criminality are more important than share of the total. Considering the portion of the population that are citizens, it would be absurd for the citizens to not vastly outstrip non-citizens. So, what we really want to know is whether the non-citizen share of crime is higher than its share of the population. If it is, they are, on average, more dangerous than citizens. If not, they are, individually, less of a threat. It's that simple. Now, about 14% of the US population was born a non-citizen. That might suggest that are magic number is 86%, but . . . it's not. Why? Half of those are naturalized citizens. See the chart? Yeah, an immigrant who attains citizenship will be moved to the "citizen" class. So, if we see an area where citizens don't make up at least 93% of the total, that means a non-citizen immigrant is, relatively speaking (and in aggregate!) more dangerous. Several dominoes have fallen. And, of course, there are other issues as well. There are several communities - most famously black, but also other minorities with high portions of immigrants, that protect their criminals for various reasons. This goes beyond just refusing to cooperate, but even juries acquitting on what should be open-and-shut cases. This chart has the obvious flaw in that it only follows convictions. That means anyone who got away with it doesn't count. This could, of course, go for or against either side - we don't know. Now, overall, I don't see much difference - most of the numbers are either within the margin of error, or balanced out by other figures that go the other way. Compared to citizens, non-citizens are not particularly more dangerous. Of course, looking at this thread title, there is an elephant in the room. A single (non-white) segment of the US population makes up a disproportional share of several of these crimes. Remove it, and the criminality rate for white citizens is significantly lower than for immigrants overall. At that point, however, we might as well start parsing immigrant populations as well, where we'll see the same trends - certain groups make up a disproportional share of the total crimes. And only at that point do we have anything that's even arguably useful and arguably not propaganda. Stop derailing my topic. yeah, ur even more illiterate than your average sweden invader |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
| @NiBer I lived in St-Denis, in the street where the terrorist hid and got assaulted. There are no "islamic" no-go zones in France as Fox News is claiming. It's true that cops don't go there, but it's not because of sharia. Drug dealing happens in daylight there, because it's easier for the state to let it run wild than to provide employment to it's citizens. Right wing suburbs around Paris spent decades evading as much taxes and urbanism laws as they could, resulting in ex-commie towns who played the game of integration and social mixity turning into massive shithole where only the poorer (often first-generation immigrants) stayed. The problem, at least here, isn't that people are "invading" France to tear down its culture, but that these people have been rejected for decades and used as sacrificial lambs to our great capitalist society (who needs unemployment to maximize profit). These people have other common points than European culture (be it religion, culture, skin color) so it's not really surprising to see them fall back to these. It's stupid, but a pretty common reaction. I'll take a wild guess and add that it's probably how you ended up being "red-pilled" too. Don't take too much pills or memes dude, it's not good for your health. |
|
NiBer said: In sweden, virtually 100% of crimes are perpetrated the immigrants, sweden has become the rape capital of europe, so you're completely wrong. Are you sure about that? Please feel inclined to properly back up this statement. Because ''virtually 100%' sounds like something from a newspaper that conveys a false picture. |
| I mean, I guess if you like getting raped by Muslims, then there are no no-go zones. |
NiBer said: Shame on you. You attacking right wingers today is like people attacking jews in nazi germany, it's easy to do and everyone else is doing it. Utter shame on your part. Wake up cuck. Enough trolling for today? That statement is insulting and horrid. |
Clebardman said: @NiBer I lived in St-Denis, in the street where the terrorist hid and got assaulted. There are no "islamic" no-go zones in France as Fox News is claiming. It's true that cops don't go there, but it's not because of sharia. Drug dealing happens in daylight there, because it's easier for the state to let it run wild than to provide employment to it's citizens. Right wing suburbs around Paris spent decades evading as much taxes and urbanism laws as they could, resulting in ex-commie towns who played the game of integration and social mixity turning into massive shithole where only the poorer (often first-generation immigrants) stayed. The problem, at least here, isn't that people are "invading" France to tear down its culture, but that these people have been rejected for decades and used as sacrificial lambs to our great capitalist society (who needs unemployment to maximize profit). These people have other common points than European culture (be it religion, culture, skin color) so it's not really surprising to see them fall back to these. It's stupid, but a pretty common reaction. I'll take a wild guess and add that it's probably how you ended up being "red-pilled" too. Don't take too much pills or memes dude, it's not good for your health. Absolute lie. There are pleny of no-go zones in France. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPJljhhbmbA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmZRGjLZt_M Yeah, definitely no go zones. Muslims are totally peaceful and not rapey and islam is a religion of peace. |
BlueBlack37 said: NiBer said: Shame on you. You attacking right wingers today is like people attacking jews in nazi germany, it's easy to do and everyone else is doing it. Utter shame on your part. Wake up cuck. Enough trolling for today? That statement is insulting and horrid. I love this. 'Trolling'. My statement is true. Everyone disagreeing with you must be a troll, right? Either a troll or a racist or a bigot, there's no way anything bad's happening in Europe right now! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pochreLwrQs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODw7o34Vdbk |
NiBer said: I love this. 'Trolling'. My statement is true. Everyone disagreeing with you must be a troll, right? Either a troll or a racist or a bigot, there's no way anything bad's happening in Europe right now! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pochreLwrQs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODw7o34Vdbk Did you refer to my other post? Because the videos are from sweden. |
| @NiBer Why do you open a discussion thread when you don't want to discuss? I'm sorry my own, RL experience contradicts your propaganda YT vids made by people who live at the other side of the world, but I lived neartly two years in a "no-go zone", and I'm as atheist and white as you can get. The funny thing is, I hate religions with a passion and I think they're a huge problem, but your simplistic and communautarist reaction is exactly the reason why they are a problem in the first place. |
DeathkoMar 3, 2017 7:18 AM
|
Zeally said: Immigrants actually commit less crimes than native borns well at least in America. It's not even close Yet people are suddenly so afraid of immigrants because they saw one incident on TV/news then some how extrapolate to the conclusion that immigrants are destroying their country. This is the most retarded graph I have ever seen. How can you actually use such crap as evidence of who commits more crime? You do realize that "immigrants" and even sometimes "illegal immigrants" become citizens, right? |
| Humans have this rather compelling tendency to compete and eliminate. Over thousands of years, there has been various civilizations that held strong for centuries before dissipating away in the flow of time. And when one such civilization is at its peak, the rest of the world will look upto it and that civilization (using military force or otherwise) prove to the world that they are the chosen ones. So its reasonable to assume that there has never been any known civilization that actually helped to promote peace and coexistence among humans. We need a target for our violent urges and so we create one. Thats all there is to it. Whether it be wars, or racism or crime or economy, it just follows one simple principle, "Might is right". So those of you claiming to be on the right and mighty side today, will witness the downfall of your splendor only for another set of people to take that place. Its always just a matter of time before the hero becomes zero! |
| Best ending line in anime history = "My name is Saiki Kusuo. I am a psychic." |
| I used to think "anti-white propaganda" was some sort of conspiracy theory, until Europe started to allow hordes of refugees and migrants in and let them do whatever they want and blatantly and publicly call of the destruction of their own (white) cultures. Recently after the election, the media here in the US has been doing the same thing, but the media in Europe is more open about it and more extreme at this point. So now I admit that anti-white propaganda is real. The way I see it, the global elites want one "human" race with no cultural attachments that they can easily enslave, and their starting with whites first because they would resist the most and the others (probably Asians next) would fall like dominoes. |
 |
Clebardman said: @NiBer Why do you open a discussion thread when you don't want to discuss? I'm sorry my own, RL experience contradicts your propaganda YT vids made by people who live at the other side of the world, but I lived neartly two years in a "no-go zone", and I'm as atheist and white as you can get. The funny thing is, I hate religions with a passion and I think they're a huge problem, but your simplistic and communautarist reaction is exactly the reason why they are a problem in the first place. The 'my own experience' therefore everything atrocious going on in Europe is automatically untrue. Just because you haven't experienced it doesn't mean it's true, if you haven't exaggerated it (living in a no-go zone, huh), or even told the truth. 'My own experience' isn't an argument against what's now daily going on in Europe. Even if what you said WAS true, it doesn't invalidate serious problems caused by a massive refugee influx. |
| This whole "multiculturalism = less white people" bullshit is falling apart at the seams. Notice that it's mostly regressive white cucks pushing the white guilt agenda. I'd rather not get too hung up on "anti-white" specifically, however, as it's only a symptom of a much larger social slave trade. On the topic of red-pilling, it was such a refreshing moment to see an alliance form between the Alt Right and Hotep. Ironic how white nationalists and black power advocates can work together for each other's mutual interests better than so-called tolerant, peaceful, caring, kind, inclusive, loving ((("liberals"))). |
 |
| Even putting aside the fact that 'white pride' was born from xenophobia rather than a reaction to decades of oppression like most pride movements, one big reason I'll never be proud of the fact that I was born white is because of threads like this. When you create a non existent problem just so you can pretend you're oppresed, you're really no different from them 'Essjaydoubleyoo' folk you've been complaining about since 2013. EDIT: Oh, and I just realised your name is a thinly veiled racial slur. Really helps your 'non hateful' case. |
SeibaaHomuMar 3, 2017 8:53 AM
 |
imeli said: higher level of trolling more like it.... and angelic skin color?Minorities don't like white people because they are jealous of our angelic skin color and higher level of intelligence. sure thats true EXCEPT FRECKLES |
| Don't get me wrong. I don't resent the fact that I was born white. I'm actually relieved that I've never had to deal with real oppression. But like, I don't see why I should be proud of it. Even putting aside the inherent racism in the 'white pride' movement I just think it's a very weird thing to be proud of. I mean, whites are by far the dominant race where I come from. There's nothing unique or special about me. There isn't any real form of oppression for me to fight against. All things considered I'm pretty fuckin privileged. |
SeibaaHomuMar 3, 2017 9:16 AM
|
SeibaaHomu said: Don't get me wrong. I don't resent the fact that I was born white. I'm actually relieved that I've never had to deal with real oppression. But like, I don't see why I should be proud of it. Even putting aside the inherent racism in the 'white pride' movement I just think it's a very weird thing to be proud of. I mean, whites are by far the dominant race where I come from. There's nothing unique or special about me. There isn't any real form of oppression for me to fight against. All things considered I'm pretty fuckin privileged. Because we built the civilization, Mod Edit: Removed unnecessary words. |
RawrbertoMar 6, 2017 11:19 PM
| I'm not proud of being white but I'm not ashamed of it either (although I am proud over my two ethnicities but IMO it's different from being proud over one's race) I don't think it's going to go so far that anti-white rhetoric is going to turn white people into slaves or whatever but I still think it's retarded because A) it's racist B) it envenoms the debate and C) I don't believe in collective guilt (the funny thing is that a lot of the people who complain about les evils whiteys all the time are white themselves) |
 Nico- said: Conversations with people pinging/quoting me to argue about some old post I wrote years ago will not be entertained@Comic_Sans oh no y arnt ppl dieing i need more ppl dieing rly gud plot avansement jus liek tokyo ghoul if erbudy dies amirite |
| Jesus H. Christ, this thread pretty much sums up why CE gets the reputation it does. OT: That kind of shit is pretty commonplace where I live, and was especially big around 2015/early 2016. Regardless, I feel that racism in all its forms is utterly abhorrent and find it ridiculous that so much emphasis is still placed on something as trivial as the amount of melanin in a person's skin. That's why I don't like racial pride either. |
Take care of yourself |
| I know that in the video those women said a lot of bullshit but... at 1:33 we can read the following: "London England now 49% white, its no longer 'London', this is white genocide. Its wrong and it must be stopped''. White genocide?? seriously? Also, that youtube comment section is full of racists supporting ethnic cleansing. |
Trazilibo said: I know that in the video those women said a lot of bullshit but... at 1:33 we can read the following: "London England now 49% white, its no longer 'London', this is white genocide. Its wrong and it must be stopped''. White genocide?? seriously? Also, that youtube comment section is full of racists supporting ethnic cleansing. Pretty much. Things escalated quickly I'd say. I didn't know MAL was so extreme. It's sad seeing a forum post like this :l. |
 |
aedonis said: Trazilibo said: I know that in the video those women said a lot of bullshit but... at 1:33 we can read the following: "London England now 49% white, its no longer 'London', this is white genocide. Its wrong and it must be stopped''. White genocide?? seriously? Also, that youtube comment section is full of racists supporting ethnic cleansing. Pretty much. Things escalated quickly I'd say. I didn't know MAL was so extreme. It's sad seeing a forum post like this :l. >i didn't know mal was so extreme it's not... this is just like 2 people being retarded and two literal whos that i've never seen posting before today. alti doesn't count. |
Oh maybe, maybe it's the clothes we wear The tasteless bracelets and the dye in our hair Or maybe, maybe it's our nowhere towns or our nothing places But we're trash, you and me We're the litter on the breeze We're the lovers on the streets Just trash, me and you It's in everything we do It's in everything we do |
Hoppy said: Immahnoob said: Unnecessary hatred is never ok. Now it's more acceptable to attack white people. It's pretty foolish and it will backfire, I mean, it's already happening. We're lucky it's just the conservative counterculture for the most part and in the US we have a center-right president and the UK got Brexit, it could've been much much worse. We barely missed the big one (and in Sweden, the worst is pretty much bound to happen and it's a question of when than if). What does this have to do with "anti-white propaganda"? |
| Losing an Argument online? Simply post a webpage full of links, and refuse to continue until your opponents have read every last one of them! WORKS EVERY TIME! "I was debating with someone who believed in climate change, when he linked me to a graph showing evidence to that effect. So I sent him a 10k word essay on the origins of Conservatism, and escaped with my dignity intact." "THANK YOU VERBOSE WEBPAGES OF QUESTIONABLE RELEVANCE!" |
Darek said: Based TJ is based as alwaysSeibaaHomu said: Don't get me wrong. I don't resent the fact that I was born white. I'm actually relieved that I've never had to deal with real oppression. But like, I don't see why I should be proud of it. Even putting aside the inherent racism in the 'white pride' movement I just think it's a very weird thing to be proud of. I mean, whites are by far the dominant race where I come from. There's nothing unique or special about me. There isn't any real form of oppression for me to fight against. All things considered I'm pretty fuckin privileged. You right now: |
Nico- said: Conversations with people pinging/quoting me to argue about some old post I wrote years ago will not be entertained@Comic_Sans oh no y arnt ppl dieing i need more ppl dieing rly gud plot avansement jus liek tokyo ghoul if erbudy dies amirite |
| Did anyone actually watch the video and look at the "sources" in the description? That is incredibly hilarious. |
 |
clandestine said: I just Don't care anymore I don't care about what race I am or what another person's race is Are these people dumb? Absolutely. But the people in this thread who are defending white "superiority" and "supremacy" are equally dumb. Fighting racism with more racism juuuust stirs the already boiling pot. Black person proud to be black = not racist Asian person proud to be Asian = not racist White person proud to be white = racist Don't you see the hypocrisy here? Wake up! https://redice.tv/a/i/n/15/32866Racial%20Pride.jpg Mod Edit: Removed unnecessary words. |
RawrbertoMar 6, 2017 11:13 PM
NudeBear said: The fact that "reverse racism" is a term that is also commonly used tells me you're the delusional one.It's pretty obvious that the entire world already admires and loves Westerners and Western culture. Ha sure, people that hate white people do exist. Newsflash, we (non-whites) have to deal with racism too. However, to take the fact that racism against white people exists and extend it to some grand accusation about how the rest of the world is out get white people and eliminate them from the planet is nothing more but delusion. Nice superiority and persecution complexes bro. Get some help and go see professional. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Trazilibo said: I know that in the video those women said a lot of bullshit but... at 1:33 we can read the following: "London England now 49% white, its no longer 'London', this is white genocide. Its wrong and it must be stopped''. White genocide?? seriously? Also, that youtube comment section is full of racists supporting ethnic cleansing. Hahahaha. Every country deserves to fight for their culture and inheritance to remain intact. We are not the babysitter of the world. Take care of your own damn country. Since when did become norm for white people to take everyone. Why doesn't Japan then allow influx of millions of refugees there? Why doesn't your country then take in millions of potential ISIS members? You didn't think of that, did you? But we're racist ones, right. For trying to preserve our entire fucking history. |
aedonis said: Trazilibo said: I know that in the video those women said a lot of bullshit but... at 1:33 we can read the following: "London England now 49% white, its no longer 'London', this is white genocide. Its wrong and it must be stopped''. White genocide?? seriously? Also, that youtube comment section is full of racists supporting ethnic cleansing. Pretty much. Things escalated quickly I'd say. I didn't know MAL was so extreme. It's sad seeing a forum post like this :l. It's sad that people would rebel to such disgusting anti-white hatred, right. Stay ignorant. |
NudeBear said: There's no need to be upset. It's like you haven't been here the past 4 years and haven't seen what the media has been doing.Immahnoob said: The fact that "reverse racism" is a term that is also commonly used tells me you're the delusional one. Sure buddy. Why don't you just run along and go masturbate to children or something.  |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
NiBer said: aedonis said: Pretty much. Things escalated quickly I'd say. I didn't know MAL was so extreme. It's sad seeing a forum post like this :l. It's sad that people would rebel to such disgusting anti-white hatred, right. Stay ignorant. I am not ignorant mate. Being against ethnic cleansing and being able to understand what's wrong in the phrase "London England now 49% white, its no longer 'London', this is white genocide. Its wrong and it must be stopped'' its not being ignorant. There is hate towards every race, but if you study a bit of history its obvious that some races and nations were at a historical disadvantage that left some scars on society. |
AnnoKano said: Because it's tied together?Hoppy said: We're lucky it's just the conservative counterculture for the most part and in the US we have a center-right president and the UK got Brexit, it could've been much much worse. We barely missed the big one (and in Sweden, the worst is pretty much bound to happen and it's a question of when than if). What does this have to do with "anti-white propaganda"? |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Immahnoob said: Because it's tied together? There was anti-white propaganda when it came to remainers/remoaners, heck they went as far to blame old people for Brexit which didn't happen when Trump got elected. |
 |
| i like some actual statistics on that claim that racism against whites are popular worldwide when majority of the economy and even the entertainment sector run by white people are popular all around the world seems to me that video as evidence of anti-white propaganda is just overgeneralizing/exaggeration |
And what was this anti-white propaganda? Hoppy said: heck they went as far to blame old people for Brexit which didn't happen when Trump got elected. They blamed old people because old people overwhelmingly voted for Brexit, while most young people voted remain. This is a talking point because those old people will not have to live through the consequences of Brexit, while the young people will. But I do not see what this has to do with being anti-white. |
| Losing an Argument online? Simply post a webpage full of links, and refuse to continue until your opponents have read every last one of them! WORKS EVERY TIME! "I was debating with someone who believed in climate change, when he linked me to a graph showing evidence to that effect. So I sent him a 10k word essay on the origins of Conservatism, and escaped with my dignity intact." "THANK YOU VERBOSE WEBPAGES OF QUESTIONABLE RELEVANCE!" |
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
272 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |