New
Aug 26, 2017 7:33 PM
#101
well actually you are using something that someone other stole, so basically its not stealing but nobody cares about that anyway |
Aug 26, 2017 7:37 PM
#102
lihle808 said: Stealing is stealing, there is no justification for piracy. Those anime producers work hard to produce one episode(check out Shirobako) and you just go to these illegal websites and take them without sweat, then have the balls to criticize your ass off an anime. Another moralist that thinks he's actually supporting the industry. lol |
Aug 26, 2017 7:40 PM
#103
Hey_Taka-tin_Hey said: I seriously hate people who can't admit to what they are. You're a leech, accept it and embrace it. I pirate too, so I'm one as well. Doesn't matter if it's technically not stealing, now we're just playing semantics and that's a waste of everyone's time. We're still scum. Nope. The legal sites are shit, that's not my fault. |
Aug 26, 2017 7:43 PM
#104
Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. |
Aug 26, 2017 8:17 PM
#105
Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? |
Aug 26, 2017 8:20 PM
#106
Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. |
Aug 26, 2017 8:24 PM
#107
Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. you got no idea how anime making is done then anime is owned by the production committee a group of companies sharing money to make an anime and then they hire a anime studio as a contractor to animate the anime adaptation of a source material that is usually owned by one of the companies included in the production committee whether you hate the production committees from hoarding most of the profit or not this is how anime is being made today and majority of anime studios do not get any other bonuses from this production committees |
Aug 26, 2017 8:28 PM
#108
isekai said: Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. you got no idea how anime making is done then anime is owned by the production committee a group of companies sharing money to make an anime and then they hire a anime studio as a contractor to animate the anime adaptation of a source material that is usually owned by one of the companies included in the production committee whether you hate the production committees from hoarding most of the profit or not this is how anime is being made today and majority of anime studios do not get any other bonuses from this production committees And CR is still useless. Legal or illegal, we aren't helping anybody. |
Aug 26, 2017 8:31 PM
#109
What is this thread even talking about? Of course it is stealing. Stop trying to play with definitions. Stealing is considered wrong because you're consuming or taking the BENEFIT of something WITHOUT PERMISSION. The fact is that money (which we use to pay someone for something) was invented because we want to EXCHANGE benefits to acquire the items we want. The very fact that all of us who use kissanime are watching the shows without the permission of the authors/owners, not exchanging any kind of value with the producers of the content is stealing full stop. In my opinion stealing isn't a bad thing in and off itself. I would like to pay for my content but paid services aren't as good as free ones. Most people who use illegal streaming don't want to pay mainly because they aren't financially secure enough to do so. Illegal streaming also builds up a massive fellowship of the anime medium itself which ultimately does benefit legal streaming down-the-line since series that haven't been licenced are available for free elsewhere - it offers up a huge potential reserve of customers for legal sites. Because of things like this I'm not really against Piracy. Regardless of anyone's opinions though, piracy will always exist because the internet. Stop trying to offer a defense of blatant stealing. It's okay to live as a hypocrite and use both legal or illegal services etc., that's just a part of what makes us human. |
Aug 26, 2017 8:38 PM
#110
Kittens-kun said: isekai said: Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. you got no idea how anime making is done then anime is owned by the production committee a group of companies sharing money to make an anime and then they hire a anime studio as a contractor to animate the anime adaptation of a source material that is usually owned by one of the companies included in the production committee whether you hate the production committees from hoarding most of the profit or not this is how anime is being made today and majority of anime studios do not get any other bonuses from this production committees And CR is still useless. Legal or illegal, we aren't helping anybody. whats your source for what you are saying? since the anime industry report 2016 page 2 here http://aja.gr.jp/english/japan-anime-data says that overseas profit of anime is huge, and do note the internet distribution on that graph is just for domestic only meaning japan only while the legal streaming sites profit is part of the overseas graph |
Aug 26, 2017 8:39 PM
#111
Elegade said: So would you like to coin a new term for it then? How is taking money from proper licencors and publishers not theft? It is stealing, but you're not stealing the work itself, you are practically taking away a source of potential revenue for the studio whenever you pirate. Lets even take this further and use Youtube as an example, I make a boss ass video that I am really proud of, I got 10k views on it, the next day a Youtube channel with millions of subscribers downloaded my video and posted it on their channel and it got a million views. Now how is that not stealing? Now you're wondering that's not the same cause blah blah blah, but all media except royalty free stuff are protected under the Digitial Millennium Copyright Act. Not just the USA media and the USA licensors. DCMA can't be applied in Europe or Japan unless that is a request in the courts (Europe after a long process and not applied in Netherlands, etc). It could be seeing stealing only if you made a profit from the digital media as DCMA, and other laws indicate. |
Aug 26, 2017 8:40 PM
#112
Kittens-kun said: Ohhh, you should have specified that you were talking about the animators, no worries though. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. |
Aug 26, 2017 8:41 PM
#113
Good grief. Words change their meanings over time. They adapt to a changing society. It is a given. When the word was coined, illegal streaming didn't exist. And besides, you are denying the producer profit. Stop being pedantic. Why are we having this argument anyway? The OP has proved time and again he/she is a brick wall who will not budge to reason. |
You gave up your freedom of speech when you clicked Agree to the User Agreement This is not a public platform. My gaze is the measure of all things: I stopped considering "anime" a helpful tag Recommended Essays Exploring Actually Excellent World-Building |
Aug 26, 2017 8:46 PM
#114
Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Ohhh, you should have specified that you were talking about the animators, no worries though. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" |
Aug 26, 2017 8:48 PM
#115
Using CR might not help the orginal creators but the money does go to the production companies in Japan. All that matters is that the money IS flowing back into Japanese banks. What's not legally 'our' concern is how the Japanese production companies use this money to pay the real creators etc. The fault doesn't lie in the legal services and the people using them, it lies with the industry itself which does underpay it's workers. This is a Japanese issue not ours. If you want to directly support the creators then you have to use more direct methods like Patreon etc. Not that hard to understand. If you aren't willing to do that then stop trying to diss on CR and other legal streaming services. When you pay $0 for any of the content you consume you don't get to defend yourself from saying you aren't stealing. Again as I said before, I have nothing against people who use illegal services. It's not wrong, it's completely natural to do so. If there is a common resource that is hard to control/everyone has access to then it should be no surprise for people to use it e.g. Water; you could pay for water but you could just as easily get it for free if you lived near a river. There's nothing wrong about it because it's common. Pirated content has become like this common resource. It's everywhere and near impossible to control so it should be of no surprise to have a lot of people using it. Legal services simply have to compete regardless, offer up more value for the $$ you put in to justify switching from simply receiving the content for free. I use CR for shows that are licensed, 9anime for shows that aren't. Not that hard to understand. |
Aug 26, 2017 8:51 PM
#116
No matter how you craft your arguments, taking content you didn't make and posting it with the aim of profits in stealing. Kissanime by far is intentionally putting ads on their sites of illegally obtained content, therefore IT IS STEALING. But to spin your arguments and to play with words just to make yourself feel less guilty? Please. Just face it, you use an illegal service and it is stealing. While you are admittedly less guilty because you don't attempt to profit off stolen content, you are watching something which should otherwise be bought. I'm NOT even complaining about the money Kiss makes, nor do I care at all. Illegal streaming sites provide a service for people who will never otherwise be able to watch it (Well I personally torrent, but that's beside the point). I don't care about the morality of this either, because I got FUCK all to watch on legal sites in my country and I can hence understand the reasoning behind piracy. |
If your favourite character is Tsutsukakushi Tsukiko, you are my soul mate. Been a long time since I've been here, I'll continue expressing myself freely and believe everyone should too. My MAL Interview |
Aug 26, 2017 8:59 PM
#117
Kittens-kun said: I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" I don't understand. Kissanime provides a service (illegal, yes but a service nonetheless). Sure their efforts are nothing compared to how the studios/animators working their ass off, or people working a regular job. However advertisers are the ones willingly paying money to have their ads hosted on a popular site, so I don't see why KA shouldn't get any money. I do agree that so far the legal options have been utterly lacking. It is a failure on Japan's part for never trying to properly reach out beyond their own country, so much so that it is people internationally constantly having to create sites and services for Japan's content. |
If your favourite character is Tsutsukakushi Tsukiko, you are my soul mate. Been a long time since I've been here, I'll continue expressing myself freely and believe everyone should too. My MAL Interview |
Aug 26, 2017 9:00 PM
#118
IndianAnimeReker said: Using CR might not help the orginal creators but the money does go to the production companies in Japan. All that matters is that the money IS flowing back into Japanese banks. What's not legally 'our' concern is how the Japanese production companies use this money to pay the real creators etc. The fault doesn't lie in the legal services and the people using them, it lies with the industry itself which does underpay it's workers. This is a Japanese issue not ours. If you want to directly support the creators then you have to use more direct methods like Patreon etc. Not that hard to understand. If you aren't willing to do that then stop trying to diss on CR and other legal streaming services. When you pay $0 for any of the content you consume you don't get to defend yourself from saying you aren't stealing. Again as I said before, I have nothing against people who use illegal services. It's not wrong, it's completely natural to do so. If there is a common resource that is hard to control/everyone has access to then it should be no surprise for people to use it e.g. Water; you could pay for water but you could just as easily get it for free if you lived near a river. There's nothing wrong about it because it's common. Pirated content has become like this common resource. It's everywhere and near impossible to control so it should be of no surprise to have a lot of people using it. Legal services simply have to compete regardless, offer up more value for the $$ you put in to justify switching from simply receiving the content for free. I use CR for shows that are licensed, 9anime for shows that aren't. Not that hard to understand. I'm going to diss them when they offer an inferior service. Plus, I never said I wasn't stealing. I'm just saying I don't give a shit because the legal sites have almost no merit behind them. I'm not going to pay for CR when I know that almost any illegal site is better than it. |
Aug 26, 2017 9:04 PM
#119
they stole other people contents now, if they made it purely for good will, then sure, but they charge big time for it i don't hate pirate anime, not until there's 1 good solution, but i do hate bad business practice |
Aug 26, 2017 9:09 PM
#120
Kittens-kun said: I'm going to diss them when they offer an inferior service. Plus, I never said I wasn't stealing. I'm just saying I don't give a shit because the legal sites have almost no merit behind them. I'm not going to pay for CR when I know that almost any illegal site is better than it. That's a fair argument you make, and it's your decision not to use CR. I don't care either way which service you use. I'm just arguing against the idea that using illegal services isn't stealing. It is, deal with it and move on. Hell if there was a illegal service that gave away half of its profits back to the anime industry I would switch to that instead of CR. The fact that you don't use CR represents a flaw in their service because they weren't able to 'capture you' from the total number of internet anime viewers. I use CR solely as a way to give back to the industry and reduce the guilt of stealing everything i.e. I don't particularly care about their service quality, as long the video is in reasonable quality I'd rather watch it there. Whether or not my money actually goes to the creators is none of my concern because as I said the fault lies in the industry's use of my money not in CR or me. |
Aug 26, 2017 9:20 PM
#121
Kittens-kun said: B-but vrv is far superior to MAL... it's got Funtmation, Crunchyroll, and a ton of others. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" I know it's expensive but, blu-ray is far superior to even vrv. I know their expensive but you're talking about superiority now... :) I feel like I have to add, I'm not trying to 'white knight' about. I used KA for a long time. Hell, I even use it to this day (when I can't find what I'm looking for on vrv). I'm mainly bashing the people who don't support the industry at all or very little. If you don't buy anime or subscriptions then I don't think you should watch it. If you can't afford a hobby, you shouldn't have it. That's my opinion though I guess. |
Aug 26, 2017 9:42 PM
#122
Aug 26, 2017 10:21 PM
#123
oh, and another note, why i hate illegal streamer is not that they are pirate, but they are also stole from people who works hard that make it available free for comunity and comersialize for their own goods, when not even horriblesubs does such loathing things... |
Aug 26, 2017 10:39 PM
#124
If you look into the definition of stealing from the view of intellectual property law(for most developed nations), then that is exactly what you are doing. |
Aug 26, 2017 10:52 PM
#125
Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: B-but vrv is far superior to MAL... it's got Funtmation, Crunchyroll, and a ton of others. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Ohhh, you should have specified that you were talking about the animators, no worries though. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" I know it's expensive but, blu-ray is far superior to even vrv. I know their expensive but you're talking about superiority now... :) I feel like I have to add, I'm not trying to 'white knight' about. I used KA for a long time. Hell, I even use it to this day (when I can't find what I'm looking for on vrv). I'm mainly bashing the people who don't support the industry at all or very little. If you don't buy anime or subscriptions then I don't think you should watch it. If you can't afford a hobby, you shouldn't have it. That's my opinion though I guess. The price isn't the issue (Amazon being the exception) It's that they don't off anything that's actually worth my money. If there was a site that was as good or better than the illegal sites, and it cost around the same as CR, then me and a lot of other people would pay for it. We pirate because the services are shit, not just because we don't feel like or can't pay. "The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting antipiracy technology to work, it's by giving those people a service that's better than what they're receiving from the pirates." - Gabe Newell. |
TsukuyomiREKTAug 26, 2017 11:11 PM
Aug 26, 2017 11:05 PM
#126
This is a great shitpost. I mean really let's just trip people up on the legal semantics of this whole farce and watch them fight back and forth about it. Its pretty funny if I do say so myself. But regardless there is a reason it's called illegal streaming and not theft. Unless your the one that stole it, obviously. If we need to put a legal boundary on "illegal streaming" then it would be akin to possession of stolen property. Since the item you are watching is held on your streaming device for a period of time. Or if we are taking the hypothetical standpoint that someone owns an account for CR and is taking from them then we can make up a new term and call it possession of pirated goods. Yes the show you are watching is also considered an item since it was made for the purpose of distribution with a fee; i.e Blu-ray, and CR or a cable contract. But that's just legal stuff. An act of illegality is just that, illegal. But really tho this thread is dumb. |
Aug 26, 2017 11:12 PM
#127
I don't blame people for stealing it and watching it on those sites. I have Netflix and CR myself but not everyone does If this exclusive rights gets so spread out that certain anime goes to Netflix, certain ones are on Anime Strike (Amazon) or CR. No one wants to jump through all those hoops. I already have Amazon Prime but I'm not paying extra on top of that just to watch Re:Creators. Illegal site for me. |
Aug 26, 2017 11:13 PM
#128
Oh good, this thread. I just came here to see everyone saying that OP s wrong, but what a shitstorm you've incited. You can remain defiant in your reasoning and belive yourself that you're the right one here, but I guarantee, here on MAL - on this specific topic - you're in the minority. I'm not gonna be a juvenile child and berate you on why you're wrong (everyone's taken care of that) I'll just say that your stance on this topic is the unpopular one. For the record, I don't use bullshit sites like KissAnime or 9anime to watch anime. I'd rather torrent it instead. Either way it's still 'stealing' though. |
"This is my darkness. Nothing anyone says will console me." ☆ 𝙰𝚗𝚒𝚖𝚎 𝙻𝚒𝚜𝚝 ☆ ☆ 𝚅𝙽𝙳𝚋 ☆ ☆ 𝙱𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚢 ☆ |
Aug 26, 2017 11:16 PM
#129
JFuji said: I don't blame people for stealing it and watching it on those sites. I have Netflix and CR myself but not everyone does If this exclusive rights gets so spread out that certain anime goes to Netflix, certain ones are on Anime Strike (Amazon) or CR. No one wants to jump through all those hoops. I already have Amazon Prime but I'm not paying extra on top of that just to watch Re:Creators. Illegal site for me. That's another thing. You'd have to have all three of the big streaming sites because they spread the shit out with their exclusive bs. People will say that CR or Netflix aren't bad on their own. But when you pretty much have to pay for all three? That shit adds up quick. |
Aug 26, 2017 11:17 PM
#130
Kittens-kun said: I haven't found anything wrong with, the previously mentioned, vrv. It's a great service. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Ohhh, you should have specified that you were talking about the animators, no worries though. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" I know it's expensive but, blu-ray is far superior to even vrv. I know their expensive but you're talking about superiority now... :) I feel like I have to add, I'm not trying to 'white knight' about. I used KA for a long time. Hell, I even use it to this day (when I can't find what I'm looking for on vrv). I'm mainly bashing the people who don't support the industry at all or very little. If you don't buy anime or subscriptions then I don't think you should watch it. If you can't afford a hobby, you shouldn't have it. That's my opinion though I guess. The price isn't the issue (Amazon being the exception) It's that they don't off anything that's actually worth my money. If there was a site that was as good or better than the illegal sites, and it cost around the same as CR, then me and a lot of other people would pay for it. We pirate because the services are shit, not just because we don't feel like or can't pay. "The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting antipiracy technology to work, it's by giving those people a service that's better than what they're receiving from the pirates." - Gabe Newell. When it comes right down to it, piracy is wrong. It's not about morals, it's about supporting the industry you love. It's would be better to only watch what you buy (physical copies) rather than illegally stream or torrent it. Some may say, "That's unrealistic" or "I'm not going to buy something I don't know I'll even like", and whilst I slightly agree with those arguments, I can still acknowledge that getting your entertainment through illegal channels is wrong. Those sites should be your last resort. By that I mean, if your not able to use a streaming serivice, borrow it from a friend, or just buy the physical copies, then and only then, I can slightly agree with someone illegally streaming. |
Aug 26, 2017 11:21 PM
#131
Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: I haven't found anything wrong with, the previously mentioned, vrv. It's a great service. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: B-but vrv is far superior to MAL... it's got Funtmation, Crunchyroll, and a ton of others. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Ohhh, you should have specified that you were talking about the animators, no worries though. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" I know it's expensive but, blu-ray is far superior to even vrv. I know their expensive but you're talking about superiority now... :) I feel like I have to add, I'm not trying to 'white knight' about. I used KA for a long time. Hell, I even use it to this day (when I can't find what I'm looking for on vrv). I'm mainly bashing the people who don't support the industry at all or very little. If you don't buy anime or subscriptions then I don't think you should watch it. If you can't afford a hobby, you shouldn't have it. That's my opinion though I guess. The price isn't the issue (Amazon being the exception) It's that they don't off anything that's actually worth my money. If there was a site that was as good or better than the illegal sites, and it cost around the same as CR, then me and a lot of other people would pay for it. We pirate because the services are shit, not just because we don't feel like or can't pay. "The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting antipiracy technology to work, it's by giving those people a service that's better than what they're receiving from the pirates." - Gabe Newell. When it comes right down to it, piracy is wrong. It's not about morals, it's about supporting the industry you love. It's would be better to only watch what you buy (physical copies) rather than illegally stream or torrent it. Some may say, "That's unrealistic" or "I'm not going to buy something I don't know I'll even like", and whilst I slightly agree with those arguments, I can still acknowledge that getting your entertainment through illegal channels is wrong. Those sites should be your last resort. By that I mean, if your not able to use a streaming serivice, borrow it from a friend, or just buy the physical copies, then and only then, I can slightly agree with someone illegally streaming. Yeah, we're just not going to see eye-to-eye on this one. I'm just going to end up repeating myself, so I'm just gonna stop here. |
Aug 26, 2017 11:27 PM
#132
I feel like half the people who look down on "pirates" are the same ones who are gonna happily have google install a microchip in their brain in 2020 for a thousands bucks or w/e. |
Aug 26, 2017 11:43 PM
#133
sasalx said: I hope you feel better while thinking like that OP. I get my 8 hours of beauty sleep every night. It feels great man. (my thought process on the matter is definetly different from OP's tho) |
AstZeroAug 26, 2017 11:49 PM
The beauty of humans is that they say one thing then do another, but at the same time that can also be their ugliest side. |
Aug 27, 2017 3:46 AM
#134
I guess I'm a thief. I don't care either way, I'm not paying for anime, not unless I absolutely have to. Even then I'd rather not spend money and just quit anime. |
Gintama > One Piece = Naruto > Bleach > DBZ Nyanko Big is my spirit animal. |
Aug 27, 2017 3:56 AM
#135
Well tbh The legal site have the region block, what else you can do? If illegal one available then so be it. Physical Copies are out of reach the price are kinda ridicolous? I prefer digital copies/stream but meh.. region blocks. |
Aug 27, 2017 4:43 AM
#136
Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: I haven't found anything wrong with, the previously mentioned, vrv. It's a great service. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: B-but vrv is far superior to MAL... it's got Funtmation, Crunchyroll, and a ton of others. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Ohhh, you should have specified that you were talking about the animators, no worries though. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" I know it's expensive but, blu-ray is far superior to even vrv. I know their expensive but you're talking about superiority now... :) I feel like I have to add, I'm not trying to 'white knight' about. I used KA for a long time. Hell, I even use it to this day (when I can't find what I'm looking for on vrv). I'm mainly bashing the people who don't support the industry at all or very little. If you don't buy anime or subscriptions then I don't think you should watch it. If you can't afford a hobby, you shouldn't have it. That's my opinion though I guess. The price isn't the issue (Amazon being the exception) It's that they don't off anything that's actually worth my money. If there was a site that was as good or better than the illegal sites, and it cost around the same as CR, then me and a lot of other people would pay for it. We pirate because the services are shit, not just because we don't feel like or can't pay. "The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting antipiracy technology to work, it's by giving those people a service that's better than what they're receiving from the pirates." - Gabe Newell. When it comes right down to it, piracy is wrong. It's not about morals, it's about supporting the industry you love. It's would be better to only watch what you buy (physical copies) rather than illegally stream or torrent it. Some may say, "That's unrealistic" or "I'm not going to buy something I don't know I'll even like", and whilst I slightly agree with those arguments, I can still acknowledge that getting your entertainment through illegal channels is wrong. Those sites should be your last resort. By that I mean, if your not able to use a streaming serivice, borrow it from a friend, or just buy the physical copies, then and only then, I can slightly agree with someone illegally streaming. Well Using borrowed physical copies/streaming services would be a good idea really but there is one big issue. That issue is called Regionlocking. Not all Anime watchers in the west are American and anime is not region free (kike games are). I live in Europe so I cannot watch stuff from Funimation (even though Funi is part of vrv like CR is), Aniplex or any other distributors who don't go Europe. I have to pray for shows to get the CR, Netflix or Amazon license so that I can at least watch them. |
Aug 27, 2017 5:04 AM
#137
Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" Part of the money you spend on Crunchyroll or Funimation goes to translation and staff on that end. And KissAnime steals from Crunchyroll... so stealing a translator's work. Kiss Anime would be more respectable in my eyes if they did any of their own translations. Much like how Aarinfantasy does their own translations. But they don't. They make money off other people's work through and through. |
The anime community in a nutshell. |
Aug 27, 2017 5:11 AM
#138
Bourmegar said: Then why is most of KissAnime's Traffic from the USA? Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: B-but vrv is far superior to MAL... it's got Funtmation, Crunchyroll, and a ton of others. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Ohhh, you should have specified that you were talking about the animators, no worries though. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" I know it's expensive but, blu-ray is far superior to even vrv. I know their expensive but you're talking about superiority now... :) I feel like I have to add, I'm not trying to 'white knight' about. I used KA for a long time. Hell, I even use it to this day (when I can't find what I'm looking for on vrv). I'm mainly bashing the people who don't support the industry at all or very little. If you don't buy anime or subscriptions then I don't think you should watch it. If you can't afford a hobby, you shouldn't have it. That's my opinion though I guess. The price isn't the issue (Amazon being the exception) It's that they don't off anything that's actually worth my money. If there was a site that was as good or better than the illegal sites, and it cost around the same as CR, then me and a lot of other people would pay for it. We pirate because the services are shit, not just because we don't feel like or can't pay. "The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting antipiracy technology to work, it's by giving those people a service that's better than what they're receiving from the pirates." - Gabe Newell. When it comes right down to it, piracy is wrong. It's not about morals, it's about supporting the industry you love. It's would be better to only watch what you buy (physical copies) rather than illegally stream or torrent it. Some may say, "That's unrealistic" or "I'm not going to buy something I don't know I'll even like", and whilst I slightly agree with those arguments, I can still acknowledge that getting your entertainment through illegal channels is wrong. Those sites should be your last resort. By that I mean, if your not able to use a streaming serivice, borrow it from a friend, or just buy the physical copies, then and only then, I can slightly agree with someone illegally streaming. Well Using borrowed physical copies/streaming services would be a good idea really but there is one big issue. That issue is called Regionlocking. Not all Anime watchers in the west are American and anime is not region free (kike games are). I live in Europe so I cannot watch stuff from Funimation (even though Funi is part of vrv like CR is), Aniplex or any other distributors who don't go Europe. I have to pray for shows to get the CR, Netflix or Amazon license so that I can at least watch them. Crunchyroll has over 1000 titles here in the USA. And Funimation has almost as many. Hulu has around 400. All and all, very easy access to at least 2k anime here legally. And our DVDs are cheaper than most places. I think that is the piece of the argument I don't understand. With over 1000 anime and most people here not even being close to that and with Crunchyroll expanding it's retro options... It is becoming increasingly difficult to understand piracy particularly for anime in the USA. It is just so cheap now. I watched 100 titles last year 100% legally. I would say Hentai is the only thing that is truely difficult to get ahold of. |
The anime community in a nutshell. |
Aug 27, 2017 5:15 AM
#139
Rotton-Girl said: Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Ohhh, you should have specified that you were talking about the animators, no worries though. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" Part of the money you spend on Crunchyroll or Funimation goes to translation and staff on that end. And KissAnime steals from Crunchyroll... so stealing a translator's work. Kiss Anime would be more respectable in my eyes if they did any of their own translations. Much like how Aarinfantasy does their own translations. But they don't. They make money off other people's work through and through. if they are only mirroring, thay are not that bad... but they are literaly edit it, re encode it, delete it's credit, slap their watermarks like it was theirs... i think there was a problem back then when fansube refuse to release their works in soft subs because of it... |
Aug 27, 2017 5:17 AM
#140
Kuma said: Rotton-Girl said: Kittens-kun said: Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Ohhh, you should have specified that you were talking about the animators, no worries though. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" Part of the money you spend on Crunchyroll or Funimation goes to translation and staff on that end. And KissAnime steals from Crunchyroll... so stealing a translator's work. Kiss Anime would be more respectable in my eyes if they did any of their own translations. Much like how Aarinfantasy does their own translations. But they don't. They make money off other people's work through and through. if they are only mirroring, thay are not that bad... but they are literaly edit it, re encode it, delete it's credit, slap their watermarks like it was theirs... i think there was a problem back then when fansube refuse to release their works in soft subs because of it... I actually think this is why Crunchyroll has to release things in hard sub. :( |
The anime community in a nutshell. |
Aug 27, 2017 5:34 AM
#141
Rotton-Girl said: Bourmegar said: Then why is most of KissAnime's Traffic from the USA? Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: I haven't found anything wrong with, the previously mentioned, vrv. It's a great service. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: B-but vrv is far superior to MAL... it's got Funtmation, Crunchyroll, and a ton of others. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Ohhh, you should have specified that you were talking about the animators, no worries though. Kuraokani said: Kittens-kun said: Uhhh, how so? Legal streaming sites license shows. Kuraokani said: thewiru said: My oh my. You seem to be missing the entire point of the 'illegal streaming sites are wrong' argument. ZunuSan said: Consuming anime is actually watching it. And for the key thing, you do not steal the original, but you have something that it's suppose that you must not have. Yep, but you're not stealing, so don't use the word "stealing". Kuraokani said: That's by far the stupidest argument I've ever heard on this topic. Comparing digital media to apples? What the f*ck? Let's use a different comparison, shall we? Let's say that you own a bakery. Your bakery is open Monday-Friday and you're closed Saturday and Sunday. Now let's say that one Saturday, I decide that since you're closed anyways, I'll open your shop and sell goods myself. I'll use your tools, kitchen, and building... but, at the end of the day, I'll keep all the money. I didn't steal anything so I'm not in the wrong. All I did was use something that you created with hard work, to make money for myself without permission. I know that's not a fantastic comparison but, its close enough. That is not stealing, that is actually invasion and illegal use of private property Though that argument might work if you're a mutualist. "so you telling me Burger King stole the recipe from McDonalds too?" That also works for "Random guy that made a chair" and "Another random guy that also made a chair" "But it is. But you seem to have some kind of agenda so you're dismissing it from what it is. That or you're not very bright on the subject honestly" If my agenda is the truth, then yes, i have an agenda. "Yes certainly but in this instance the crime itself is stealing" Not, it isn't "taking a product you don't own is stealing though which is what they are doing and you're doing every time you use an illegal site to watch your shows." That pressupposed that if you take it, the original owner won't have it anymore, which isn't the case for anime. Also, copying isn't stealing. That was a little joke of mine. In order for it to be stealing, one must lose something. The point is, your stealing from the creators. You're copying and distributing something that you didn't create. You're stealing profits that should go to the studios and people that actually had something to do with the creation. You heard "stealing" and decided to take it literally. Either way it goes, illegal streaming sites are wrong and take profits from people who deserve them And it doesn't matter because they aren't getting payed by any legal sites either. A licensing agreement is a legal contract between two parties, known as the licensor and the licensee. In a typical licensing agreement, the licensor grants the licensee the right to produce and sell goods, apply a brand name or trademark, or use patented technology owned by the licensor. In exchange, the licensee usually submits to a series of conditions regarding the use of the licensor's property and agrees to make payments known as royalties. Am I wrong? Legal streaming sites don't pay royalties to the licensor? And none of that money actually goes to the creators. If it did, they wouldn't still be making shit wages. That's a completely different discussion though... Still, the fact remains the same, the profits should go to the manga creators or the studios who make the anime. Realistically it should go to anyone other than these illegal streaming sites. You know how much Kissanime makes a month? It's crazy. There haven't been any official figures but some guy who knows all about as revenue, said that it was a lot. There's a YouTube video on it somewhere. Now imagine, if even half of the profits that these illegal streaming sites make went to the industry, I think we we would have a much better anime industry, or at least one that we could consistently count on. I mean, I don't think that KA should be making any money either. They really don't do anything to deserve it. But I also don't agree with people telling me to pay for the inferior option just because of "muh morals" I know it's expensive but, blu-ray is far superior to even vrv. I know their expensive but you're talking about superiority now... :) I feel like I have to add, I'm not trying to 'white knight' about. I used KA for a long time. Hell, I even use it to this day (when I can't find what I'm looking for on vrv). I'm mainly bashing the people who don't support the industry at all or very little. If you don't buy anime or subscriptions then I don't think you should watch it. If you can't afford a hobby, you shouldn't have it. That's my opinion though I guess. The price isn't the issue (Amazon being the exception) It's that they don't off anything that's actually worth my money. If there was a site that was as good or better than the illegal sites, and it cost around the same as CR, then me and a lot of other people would pay for it. We pirate because the services are shit, not just because we don't feel like or can't pay. "The easiest way to stop piracy is not by putting antipiracy technology to work, it's by giving those people a service that's better than what they're receiving from the pirates." - Gabe Newell. When it comes right down to it, piracy is wrong. It's not about morals, it's about supporting the industry you love. It's would be better to only watch what you buy (physical copies) rather than illegally stream or torrent it. Some may say, "That's unrealistic" or "I'm not going to buy something I don't know I'll even like", and whilst I slightly agree with those arguments, I can still acknowledge that getting your entertainment through illegal channels is wrong. Those sites should be your last resort. By that I mean, if your not able to use a streaming serivice, borrow it from a friend, or just buy the physical copies, then and only then, I can slightly agree with someone illegally streaming. Well Using borrowed physical copies/streaming services would be a good idea really but there is one big issue. That issue is called Regionlocking. Not all Anime watchers in the west are American and anime is not region free (kike games are). I live in Europe so I cannot watch stuff from Funimation (even though Funi is part of vrv like CR is), Aniplex or any other distributors who don't go Europe. I have to pray for shows to get the CR, Netflix or Amazon license so that I can at least watch them. Crunchyroll has over 1000 titles here in the USA. And Funimation has almost as many. Hulu has around 400. All and all, very easy access to at least 2k anime here legally. And our DVDs are cheaper than most places. I think that is the piece of the argument I don't understand. With over 1000 anime and most people here not even being close to that and with Crunchyroll expanding it's retro options... It is becoming increasingly difficult to understand piracy particularly for anime in the USA. It is just so cheap now. I watched 100 titles last year 100% legally. I would say Hentai is the only thing that is truely difficult to get ahold of. Well there is more anime traffic in the USA because the USA is more exposed to Anime then Europe. Either Americans are cheapskates or not satisfied with the services? I don't know. And even though The money spend on the services goes to the translators, it allows these translators to aquire the licenses of future shows. So the money spend doesn't go directly towards the creators..... Plus is CR really working on a retro catalog? How big is that catalog now? |
Aug 27, 2017 6:52 AM
#142
Apples aren't private property they are personal property. If someone buys an apple and clones it and gives you it he did not steal that apple and neither did you. |
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
Aug 27, 2017 7:39 AM
#143
thewiru said: I recently watched the Mother's Basement video were he spouts the word "stealing" every five seconds. Anime piracy is NOT stealing: "steal VERB Take (another person's property) without permission or legal right and without intending to return it. 1.1 Dishonestly pass off (another person's ideas) as one's own.’" First things first: The concept of private property is based on a simple thing, that if i have an apple, you can't have the same apple at the same time. With anime, however, such thing doesn't happen. By a pirate website having anime in their catalog, other catalogs from other websites can still have the same anime at the same time. Since no one lost anything, it can't be stealing, as for the second definition: Well, pirate sites never actually say the work is theirs, and the names of the people who created it are all over it's OP's and ED's. You can support it or disagree with it, it's your opinion, but please, PLEASE, don't use this word. As much as I want to agree with this, it feels like a loose argument. The theft comes from a third party illegally distributing content that does not belong to them in order to make a profit. They're taking revenue from the original producers by streaming anime on their site illegally and without permission. That's where the theft comes in. Now as for the viewers, I wouldn't consider ourselves thieves but we are accessing the content illegally or illegitimately. No way to deny that. It's tough. As much as I want to justify using Kissanime, I can't in my right mind. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Aug 27, 2017 10:54 AM
#144
@Bourmegar So, the retro catalogue started growing a bit after they hooked up with Funimation, but just a LOT when they announced they have 1 million subscribers. So most of it is Funimation titles but there are others. But I will go through them in order: A Kite Captain Harlock Card Capture Sakura Card Capture Sakura: The movie Cat's Eye Ceres Champion Joe 2 Chargeman Ken Chance Pop Session Chrono Crusade Dallos DearS Deltora Quest Digimon Adventure (they have almost every Digimon series on Crunchyroll dubbed) DNA² El Hazard : The Wanderers Fantastic Adventures of Unico Fist of the North Star Fist of the North Star: The Movie Flame of Recca Fushigi Yugi (including all the OVA sequels) Gakuen Alice Galaxy Express 999 Gasaraki Genshiken Giant Gorg Go Lion God Mars GTO Gunbuster 2 (Daibuster) Gungrave Hanban Renmei Hellsing Interlude Jin-Roh Last Exile Lilly C.A.T. Little Nemo Adventures in Slumberland Lost Universe Lupin the Third (Part 1, 2, 3) Magic Users Club (including the OVA) Mazinkaiser Miss Machiko (first 45 episodes) Mobile Suit Gundam Seed Mobile Suit Gundam Seed Destiny Mobile Suit Gundam Wing Naruto Ninja Nonsense One Piece Pita Ten Please Teacher Please Twins Prétear Pretty Cure Princess Knight Princess Nine R.O.D. Ragnarok: The Animation Red Data Girl Ringing Bell Rozen Maiden Rurouni Kenshin Saint Seiya (various series up to present, original there with only 73 eps of it) Samurai Pizza Cats (sub and dub present) Samurai Troopers Scrapped Princess Sea Prince and Fire Child Serial Experiments Lain Shamanic Princess Sherlock Hound (dub only) Shingu Sin: The movie Slam Dunk Space Adventure Cobra Space Pirate Mito Street Fighter 2 The Movie Tenjou Tenge Texnolyze The Rose of Versailles Toward the Terra Unico in the Island of Magic Yakitate Japan Yugioh Duel Mosnters (they have every Yugioh on here to be clear but Yugioh Duel monsters is uniquely subbed by Crunchyroll 126 episodes done so far) Zatch Bell My cut off date was 2004 Considering they used to barely have any titles from before 2006 which was the year they started streaming legally, this is actually a major improvement from 2 years ago when most of these titles were not on there. Card Capture Sakura was one of the first retro titles along with Fushigi Yugi and GTO. I think those were put on the platform in 2014. |
Energetic-NovaAug 27, 2017 10:59 AM
The anime community in a nutshell. |
Aug 27, 2017 11:18 AM
#145
thewiru said: I recently watched the Mother's Basement video were he spouts the word "stealing" every five seconds. Anime piracy is NOT stealing: "steal VERB Take (another person's property) without permission or legal right and without intending to return it. 1.1 Dishonestly pass off (another person's ideas) as one's own.’" First things first: The concept of private property is based on a simple thing, that if i have an apple, you can't have the same apple at the same time. With anime, however, such thing doesn't happen. By a pirate website having anime in their catalog, other catalogs from other websites can still have the same anime at the same time. Since no one lost anything, it can't be stealing, as for the second definition: Well, pirate sites never actually say the work is theirs, and the names of the people who created it are all over it's OP's and ED's. You can support it or disagree with it, it's your opinion, but please, PLEASE, don't use this word. If law was based on dictionarys There is only 1 reason to i see to use Kissanime. If you are really scared of DMCA trolls coming after you for torrenting. But then there is also DL from HS that I think Kissanime might also do. well, there is also being really lazy or dumb but they are not good reasons. I hope I insulted a lot of Kissanime users here. |
Aug 27, 2017 11:31 AM
#146
Rotton-Girl said: @Bourmegar So, the retro catalogue started growing a bit after they hooked up with Funimation, but just a LOT when they announced they have 1 million subscribers. So most of it is Funimation titles but there are others. But I will go through them in order: A Kite Captain Harlock Card Capture Sakura Card Capture Sakura: The movie Cat's Eye Ceres Champion Joe 2 Chargeman Ken Chance Pop Session Chrono Crusade Dallos DearS Deltora Quest Digimon Adventure (they have almost every Digimon series on Crunchyroll dubbed) DNA² El Hazard : The Wanderers Fantastic Adventures of Unico Fist of the North Star Fist of the North Star: The Movie Flame of Recca Fushigi Yugi (including all the OVA sequels) Gakuen Alice Galaxy Express 999 Gasaraki Genshiken Giant Gorg Go Lion God Mars GTO Gunbuster 2 (Daibuster) Gungrave Hanban Renmei Hellsing Interlude Jin-Roh Last Exile Lilly C.A.T. Little Nemo Adventures in Slumberland Lost Universe Lupin the Third (Part 1, 2, 3) Magic Users Club (including the OVA) Mazinkaiser Miss Machiko (first 45 episodes) Mobile Suit Gundam Seed Mobile Suit Gundam Seed Destiny Mobile Suit Gundam Wing Naruto Ninja Nonsense One Piece Pita Ten Please Teacher Please Twins Prétear Pretty Cure Princess Knight Princess Nine R.O.D. Ragnarok: The Animation Red Data Girl Ringing Bell Rozen Maiden Rurouni Kenshin Saint Seiya (various series up to present, original there with only 73 eps of it) Samurai Pizza Cats (sub and dub present) Samurai Troopers Scrapped Princess Sea Prince and Fire Child Serial Experiments Lain Shamanic Princess Sherlock Hound (dub only) Shingu Sin: The movie Slam Dunk Space Adventure Cobra Space Pirate Mito Street Fighter 2 The Movie Tenjou Tenge Texnolyze The Rose of Versailles Toward the Terra Unico in the Island of Magic Yakitate Japan Yugioh Duel Mosnters (they have every Yugioh on here to be clear but Yugioh Duel monsters is uniquely subbed by Crunchyroll 126 episodes done so far) Zatch Bell My cut off date was 2004 Considering they used to barely have any titles from before 2006 which was the year they started streaming legally, this is actually a major improvement from 2 years ago when most of these titles were not on there. Card Capture Sakura was one of the first retro titles along with Fushigi Yugi and GTO. I think those were put on the platform in 2014. ok so I cannot see them then coz of funimation sigh So Anime watchers outside the US can only use like 1,5 legal Streaming services, Crunchyroll isn't allowed to stream shows that aren't licensed for europe to europe (not all the shows on CR are licensed by CR), Anime Strike is as far as I know not available in EU (correct me if I am wrong). Only Netflix's Anime can be shown to all countries that do Have Netflix. I wish that Regionlocking would just go away......... |
Aug 27, 2017 11:54 AM
#147
thewiru said: Anime piracy is NOT stealing: "steal VERB Take (another person's property) without permission or legal right and without intending to return it. 1.1 Dishonestly pass off (another person's ideas) as one's own.’" Piracy is a form of stealing, just not in the manner you described. With illegal distributions you are not stealing the video, however, you are stealing the legal right to make money off one's own hard work. By your own definition steaming illegal videos is taking without permission the legal right to make money off ones own creation. I also certainly doubt these pirate sites have any intention to return the stolen revenue (ad revenue, etc.) and lost revenue (from people watching outside legal means) to the original creators. Therefore, digital piracy is a form of stealing and using this term is not wrong. In response to others who claim it is not stealing so it is not a crime, the argument is moot. Piracy is explicitly defined as a separate crime in almost every country in the world. In addition, in the case of anime the content holders are protected under American or Japanese law, therefore, these pirates are breaking their laws and subject to their punishments. Why pirates are able to get away with it is a whole different story which I won't elaborate here. |
shawnofthedeadzAug 27, 2017 11:58 AM
~ S & F Guidelines ~ My Profile ~ My AnimeList / MangaList ~ ShawnOfTheDeadz.com ~ |
Aug 27, 2017 11:58 AM
#148
That's not the anime itself pirate sites are stealing, but the right to broadcast it. That's the apple. What you as a watcher is stealing, is the money that company would have got from you to let you watch it. Like, wtf man, I stream on pirate sites too, but don't start twisting logic to justify it, it's ridiculous. |
Prophetess of the Golden Era |
Aug 27, 2017 2:44 PM
#149
People who say pirating isn't stealing have never actually went through the trouble of creating something for themselves. Or else they would be terrified of the thought of having someone else making money by use of their work. Or is an ancap wacko (apparently the case oif our dear OP), and to this there's no remedy. |
Aug 27, 2017 3:27 PM
#150
More topics from this board
» Any figures you would like to see as a Fate Servant?Fukoku - Oct 5 |
40 |
by NS2D
»»
1 minute ago |
|
» Waifu War V5 (Anniversary-Edition!) (Round 1) ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )TheMinkalex - Sep 28 |
263 |
by NS2D
»»
9 minutes ago |
|
» 🍉 Summer 2025: Anime of the Season (AOTS)nirererin - 6 hours ago |
38 |
by NS2D
»»
21 minutes ago |
|
» About Horror Anime...KMIR - Yesterday |
24 |
by JayDaAnimeLord
»»
26 minutes ago |
|
» Self insertionBirdyTheMighty - 1 hour ago |
10 |
by Hiyajo-san
»»
31 minutes ago |