It's probably easiest to explain it and for others to understand if I put it in relative terms - that is, in relation to nearby numerical scores on the scale.
Even though the literal descriptor for 5 on MAL is "Average", I don't use it that way and prefer to use 6 - 7 for the average of everything I've watched. The reason being that my view is my feelings toward what I watch will trend more toward the positive direction than the negative, because I don't watch what are to me an equal amount of good and bad things, or an equal amount of things I will like and dislike. I obviously seek out what I have some expectation of liking and being good based on established preferences (which, for me are quite broad and fluid, but still exist), because why wouldn't I? If I watch 1,000 anime, why on Earth should I watch 500 within them that look bad and I expect to be bad, or otherwise uninteresting/unappealing to me? It would make no sense. It seems like a perfect waste of time and energy, and siphoning time away from where I could be watching more promising things.
Therefore 7 is my standard, go-to, solid "good" rating, but like an average good. Nothing in it which yet (if it's a series which is ongoing and gets renewed later) reaches the height of my higher-rated ones of 8s, 9s, and 10s. 6 is also basically good, but definitely a lower good - the lower side of good or maybe more accurately, "decent". Either more noticeable bothersome faults and flaws or maybe minimal to no important faults and flaws, but just very not ambitious and paint by numbers/by the book/generic for what it is and could otherwise be. 6s are ones which either aim high but fall short in one or more glaring quality-reducing ways, or ones which are basically fine without a big flaw or flaws, but never aimed high to begin with.
And 5s in relation to all that, it's like one which has the flaws of a 6/10, but where the flaws are either so numerous or severe or both that they overpower the good moreso than in the case of 6s. Or there wasn't as much good in the first place. They are one of my more negative dispensed ratings and, in fact, easily the rating I've given out the most of which I consider firmly negative, considering I rarely use 2s - 4s by comparison, and that I have no 1s and may never use that rating.
As a result of taking all this into account, 5/10s, and even some 6/10s, are therefore my most painful ratings to give out, where there is the most upsetting gulf between my hopes and the reality of the work. 4s, 3s, and 2s are just the more extreme version of that theoretically deserving a harsher rebuke with each level you go down, but in actual practice I don't use those too often because I consider myself fairly lenient and they seem a little too cartoonishly punitive for most things I watch, even if lazy and vanilla or with garbled execution. I try to sift out the positives. And indeed 5s definitely do still have some positives - something which makes them worthwhile to watch, if just for the premise alone or some good music or voice acting or unique story structure or (probably) unintentional humor or anything else. In truth, even the series I stamp the rare 2 - 4 ratings on also have some positive attribute about them, otherwise I would just drop them and not even rate them. It's just a question of degree. |