| Monogamy, can't deal with the drama from multiple women |
| 한 번만 살지만 제대로 하면 한 번이면 충분해요 |
| I want multiple wives and they are also free to have sex with each other to put on a yuri show for me. Women with multiple husbands would have yaoi show then. |
 |
| Monogamy for sure, regardless of how difficult that may actually be. Less drama. |
  ♡ Harder Daddy ♡ |
| monogamy since im a jealous guy |
| Voted polygamy because monogamy is overrated. Though when raising a kid it's better to stay focused if you're no king in a position where you must produce specific gendered heirs. |
 |
| Personally I'm monogamous but I have nothing against polyamoury/polygamy. I'm just bad at sharing. |
 |
| I'm neither a cuck nor a degenerate so monogamy ofc |
 |
| I'm fine with consenting adults being in whatever relationship arrangements best suit them. When it comes to long-term relationships, polyamory isn't for me so I'm monogamous |
BlakexEkalb said: Promethazine said: Monogamy, we're in the 21st century, no? Definitely wouldn't be happy if my bitch was getting plowed by other guys. Who says the relationship was sexual? I did, I'm being realistic here. You really think people aren't going to fuck? |
| Miss me with acting like a dog in heat all the time. |
  “The most shameless thing in the world is political power that can be inherited regardless of ability or talent!” |
ProfessionalNEET said: Monogamy? Polygamy? I've been a strict follower of nogamy all of my life. IpreferEcchi said: I want multiple wives and they are also free to have sex with each other to put on a yuri show for me. Women with multiple husbands would have yaoi show then. Would you let your wives fuck other dudes? If so, would you watch? Yes and yes. Sex has nothing to do with love. |
|
| Polyamory isn't for me. I like the validation that comes with knowing that I'm enough for my partner and, if I were to end up in a polyamorous relationship, I'd inevitably end up feeling jealous and insecure. |
Take care of yourself |
| Polygamy, of course, as long as I'm the only one who is allowed to have multiple partners. |
| Polgamy, I wanna have threesomes bro |
 |
What point are you trying to make? LOL |
| Monogamy, too many men can be annoying. |
 just wanna feel wanted by someone other than the police 😫 |
SargonTheGreat said: Monogamy wtf polygamy is degeneracy whos that big of a primate that they dont have the self respect to not fuck multiple people are once. Speaking as someone who has a very high sex drive, I really don't think there's any excuse for promiscuity/polygamy. There's no reason why people can't just have their sexual needs fulfilled by a monogamous partner. Polygamous people are just greedy is what it amounts to. IpreferEcchi said: ProfessionalNEET said: Monogamy? Polygamy? I've been a strict follower of nogamy all of my life. Would you let your wives fuck other dudes? If so, would you watch? Yes and yes. Sex has nothing to do with love. That is simply not true. Humans beings are literally designed by nature to pair bond with the people they have sex with. If you have emotional feelings for a girl, the amount of pleasure, satisfaction and general feelings of bliss you get out of sex with her is ridiculous even compared to how much you get out of casual sex. Its like 5x-10x higher. People can have sex without being in love, but to say it has nothing to do with love is just patently false. A lot of people with low or even medium sex drives don't get much satisfaction out of sex they have with people they are not in love with and for girls particularly, being in love can really change their sex drive sometimes transforming it from a low sex drive to a high one. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
| I don’t know what these words mean |
 |
| I'd kink shame the shit out of someone who wants polygamy. Monogamy of course.I'm neither cuck or something nor believe in weird 2020 trends |
| خ |
| I love polygamy if it's worth running my dick through thousands of (cats). However, I still prefer monogamy when it comes to something personal and wholesome. |
 "You don't get it, a million sorry's is not equal to one thank you." — Emilia |
| Polygamy of course! Mo' holes mo' fun. And just because you have multiple wives doesn't mean that they will cheat, what if all of them are loyal? I'd love polygamy. |
 I said keep your hands on the table |
| I sweated, cried and bled to get back the love of my life, I'm certainly not gonna share or squeeze girls I don't love for fun. |
 |
Peaceful_Critic said: Thank You! Um I guess I’m mono something then. But I’m not all about the marriage stuff I guess.Not sure how I will personally feel about being in that kind of relationship, but if consenting adults agree to a poly relationship, who am I to get in the way of that? @Zixyph A monogamy relationship is a relationship that has exclusively 2 people in it that agree to only be romantically involved with each other. A polygamy relationship is one that involves romantic relations between 3 or more people. In other words... Poly: 3 or more people in a romantic relationship with one another Mono: 2 people in a romantic relationship with one another To be clear, polygamy refers to marriage. Polyamory refers to the more general range of romantic relationships, not just marriage. Important to note is that an open relationship isn't the same as a poly one. Poly can involve sexual exclusivity to your romantic partner/s just like mono relationships. Meanwhile, an open relationship states that you can have sex with people outside of those you partnered with romantically aka people outside of the main relationship. |
|
| Monogamy, as I am much too jealous of a person to share a partner. If other people choose polygamy I don't care, consenting adults can do what they want it just isn't for me. |
| I think that if you really love someone, you can't be poly... |
Ryuk9428 said: Speaking as someone who has a very high sex drive, I really don't think there's any excuse for promiscuity/polygamy. There's no reason why people can't just have their sexual needs fulfilled by a monogamous partner. Polygamous people are just greedy is what it amounts to. The more you have a sex with same person the more level of dopamine drops and sex becomes boring and stale. This is why sex is most frequent and passionate at the beginning of the relationship and as it goes it becomes more and more rarer. This is why dead bad rooms are a thing. That is simply not true. Humans beings are literally designed by nature to pair bond with the people they have sex with. If you have emotional feelings for a girl, the amount of pleasure, satisfaction and general feelings of bliss you get out of sex with her is ridiculous even compared to how much you get out of casual sex. Its like 5x-10x higher. People can have sex without being in love, but to say it has nothing to do with love is just patently false. A lot of people with low or even medium sex drives don't get much satisfaction out of sex they have with people they are not in love with and for girls particularly, being in love can really change their sex drive sometimes transforming it from a low sex drive to a high one. Love is overrated. If you look at animal kingdom polygamy dominates, there is nothing to suggest that monogamy is natural. Men are design to spread their genes and to sleep with as many women as possible. Just look at Genghis Khan it's estimated that 1 in 200 men are his direct descendants. https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/1-in-200-men-direct-descendants-of-genghis-khan Nation is as strong as it's denizens. Women are naturally attracted to men with superior genes. Sexual competition forces men to improve and ensures that best possible genes are spread. |
 “There is great satisfaction in fighting for the sake of gaining power, but it’s joyless to fight for the sake of maintaining it.” – Reinhard Von Lohengramm |
| I gotta have a few concubines you know |
| Monogamy. I prefer one amazing, the one and only partner than several shallow "toys". |
• あきらめないで • slice of life / drama / mystery / supernatural / fantasy / sci-fi / comedy |
FreeThought said: Ryuk9428 said: Speaking as someone who has a very high sex drive, I really don't think there's any excuse for promiscuity/polygamy. There's no reason why people can't just have their sexual needs fulfilled by a monogamous partner. Polygamous people are just greedy is what it amounts to. The more you have a sex with same person the more level of dopamine drops and sex becomes boring and stale. This is why sex is most frequent and passionate at the beginning of the relationship and as it goes it becomes more and more rarer. This is why dead bad rooms are a thing. That is simply not true. Humans beings are literally designed by nature to pair bond with the people they have sex with. If you have emotional feelings for a girl, the amount of pleasure, satisfaction and general feelings of bliss you get out of sex with her is ridiculous even compared to how much you get out of casual sex. Its like 5x-10x higher. People can have sex without being in love, but to say it has nothing to do with love is just patently false. A lot of people with low or even medium sex drives don't get much satisfaction out of sex they have with people they are not in love with and for girls particularly, being in love can really change their sex drive sometimes transforming it from a low sex drive to a high one. Love is overrated. If you look at animal kingdom polygamy dominates, there is nothing to suggest that monogamy is natural. Men are design to spread their genes and to sleep with as many women as possible. Just look at Genghis Khan it's estimated that 1 in 200 men are his direct descendants. https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/1-in-200-men-direct-descendants-of-genghis-khan Nation is as strong as it's denizens. Women are naturally attracted to men with superior genes. Sexual competition forces men to improve and ensures that best possible genes are spread. And you think Ghenghis Khan is someone to look up to? The guy was a murderer. I don’t care about how many people are his descendants. Pretty much every society that doesn’t want to become violent and full of crime and warfare has realized that laissez fair sexual competition between men is a terrible idea. All polygamous societies have been extraordinarily violent societies and you don’t need to look into the historical past to realize that is true because it’s still true today. Monogamy was designed to reduce sexual competition and it has been the most successful civilizing force in our history. Thank God for Christianity because without Christianity we’d probably still be sticking each other with swords in gladiator combat. Sex is plenty fun with a single partner for your entire life. Just ask the Dugger family, they certainly don’t seem to be having any problems. People attracted to promiscuity are generally people with weak oxytocin releases. People with strong oxytocin releases get more pleasure out of having sex with their partner when they have been with them longer and have no desire to be fucking around all the time. |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Ryuk9428 said: Monogamy was designed to reduce sexual competition and it has been the most successful civilizing force in our history. Thank God for Christianity because without Christianity we’d probably still be sticking each other with swords in gladiator combat. Did you miss the 2000 years of infighting between every European country, and all the violent crimes Christianity caused? |
Ryuk9428 said: FreeThought said: The more you have a sex with same person the more level of dopamine drops and sex becomes boring and stale. This is why sex is most frequent and passionate at the beginning of the relationship and as it goes it becomes more and more rarer. This is why dead bad rooms are a thing. Love is overrated. If you look at animal kingdom polygamy dominates, there is nothing to suggest that monogamy is natural. Men are design to spread their genes and to sleep with as many women as possible. Just look at Genghis Khan it's estimated that 1 in 200 men are his direct descendants. https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/1-in-200-men-direct-descendants-of-genghis-khan Nation is as strong as it's denizens. Women are naturally attracted to men with superior genes. Sexual competition forces men to improve and ensures that best possible genes are spread. And you think Ghenghis Khan is someone to look up to? The guy was a murderer. I don’t care about how many people are his descendants. Pretty much every society that doesn’t want to become violent and full of crime and warfare has realized that laissez fair sexual competition between men is a terrible idea. All polygamous societies have been extraordinarily violent societies and you don’t need to look into the historical past to realize that is true because it’s still true today. Monogamy was designed to reduce sexual competition and it has been the most successful civilizing force in our history. Thank God for Christianity because without Christianity we’d probably still be sticking each other with swords in gladiator combat. Sex is plenty fun with a single partner for your entire life. Just ask the Dugger family, they certainly don’t seem to be having any problems. People attracted to promiscuity are generally people with weak oxytocin releases. People with strong oxytocin releases get more pleasure out of having sex with their partner when they have been with them longer and have no desire to be fucking around all the time. I didn't say you have to look up to Ghenghis Khan I listed him as a fun trivia. Many prominent christian figures were also murders. They were product of their time. The more religious country the more violent it is. Many majority christian countries are quite violent just look at south American countries. Actually Christianity has set us back considerably, especially with regards to technology. Did you forget the middle ages. Christianity also arguably played an important role in the fall of roman empire. Which was another thing that sets us back. Christian societies were also historically quite violent. Remember the crusades and all the all the wars over religion in Europe. The 4th crusade was probably most egregious when they ransacked the Byzantine another Christian city. And then didn't offer them any help when Ottomans invaded. It's probably the lowest point in Christian history, just thinking about it pisses me off. Also don't forget Christian doctrine that having sex is only for the purpose of reproduction. You would probably be seen as sinner their eyes. Many muslim societies especially during the gold age of islam from 8th century to the 14th century were quite successful and don't forget the Ottoman empire. Women have less sex after they have children, it's a proven fact. What you're going to do when your wife refuse to have sex with you? Just look at r/DeadBadrooms and their stories. https://www.reddit.com/r/DeadBedrooms/ But ultimately if you want to be betabux be my guest.  There are pros and cons to everything. In general I'm not against monogamy I just think it's time to face reality 1950 are long gone, monogamy in today society wouldn't be the same as back than. Today if you want marriage and monogamy your best bet would be to move somewhere like Japan. Monogamy and marriage are dead in west. |
“There is great satisfaction in fighting for the sake of gaining power, but it’s joyless to fight for the sake of maintaining it.” – Reinhard Von Lohengramm |
More topics from this board
» Who is the most perverted person you irl ?Thy-Veseveia - 7 hours ago |
3 |
by Spunkert
»»
13 minutes ago |
|
» What do you need cash for in your everyday life?MeanMrMusician - Apr 21 |
38 |
by Meusnier
»»
19 minutes ago |
|
» What are some of your favorite animals? ( 1 2 )DoisacChopper - Feb 10 |
51 |
by scarydragon
»»
25 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » Are you mentally ill?Ejrodiew - Apr 24 |
47 |
by Meusnier
»»
26 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » What is your average step count? [Poll] Do you think that you should take more steps?Miscanthus - 1 hour ago |
5 |
by _Nette_
»»
34 minutes ago |