jal90 said:ThatCynicalOtaku said:jal90 said:
On the other hand I'm quite surprised that of all scenarios you are reacting so strongly against this. I mean, each one has its own set of morals but I don't think accepting a lie that makes people happy under its illusion is a big moral deal compared with slaughtering citizens, invading other countries or controlling crime through mob lynching. Either way that's not relevant because you are not taking into account that this show does not judge. It shows: people are happy this way, they have found a comfortable statu quo in their lives. The implications however are left to reflection. Whether it is morally acceptable or not, whether things should be fixed or not, this series is not about giving these definite answers. Just because it's "bright and colorful" (really?) or because characters don't tell you in the face that they are in the wrong doesn't mean that the episode condones anything because the series is not about condoning or justifying behaviors. It is reality seen through Kino's lens, and Kino's lens is objective and neutral.
You haven't answered any of my points.
The protagonist's point of view of the story, and the music that is used, are basic but major components in setting a scene's tone and delivering the message.
To ignore these components is to throw away any critical analysis in favor of biased fanboyism.
Kino is supposed to be the "neutral observer" in order to prevent any episode from being biased towards one side or the other.
If this episode is "not about condoning or justifying behaviors", then why does:
-Kino smile for everyone's decision at the end?
-The music that plays at the end positive and uplifting?
This is my problem with most people on MAL: they treat anime as though it is a life of its own, so anything it says, it will be said directly by the characters, rather than characters' point of view, cinematography, choice of music, etc. It is a delusional way to view anime that prevents any critical thinking.
No sir, nobody says that the anime is a life of its own, you are saying that the creator/director of this anime condones this behaviour through lighting and colour and through the events it narrates, which if you have some minimal experience with
Kino no tabi it's very easy to debunk. And it's not about the story being a sentient entity in its own, it's about the story being created under a purpose that has remained for every episode and that is its main appeal.
Why does Kino smile? What a question. Why shouldn't she? She is in no way outraged. She is happy to know how people live there and to understand them. She could have said: "Hey, you are living a lie" but that goes against her philosophy of life, which you should know of at this point and again, if you don't I can only blame this show having Kino take a proactive role various times this season for this confusion. This is how Kino actually looks like 95% of the time so better get used. Why did Kino not help the motorrad in the first story? Why did Kino not try to save the traveller in episode 1?
Can I ask what aesthetic alternative would you have presented? A grim one that doesn't reflect the state of mind of the world and characters introduced? If a character talks about his happiness would you make the scene sad-looking on purpose? Because THAT would be a very blatant and uncalled for positioning.
Also, the next time you can't shut your mouth with implications and ad hominems cry them to the wall in your room because I don't want to read them.
Simple. Don't have cheerful music play. Or heck, don't have any music play. Have Kino's expression at the end be of uncertainty, when she thinks back on her encounter.
When she smiled at the end for everyone, that was her basically agreeing, which contradicts the purpose of her as a neutral observer, alienating any audience member like me who believes its wrong for the characters to be lying.
As for Kino's actions like the motorcycle? That's not what I've been talking about, you're going off-topic.
I wasn't throwing ad hominems; I was just saying that, form my perspective, you weren't thinking outside of the box and were looking on whether the characters follow logic, more than what their actions are saying, basically, just like so many people on MAL, who excuse any criticism with, "but this is how the character behaves, so it's inevitable"