VKDOOM said:FontSize72LOL said:
@VKDOOM
Honestly i didn't have issues with that, and i've read the manga. There are so many better things to nitpick on than the characterization of minor characters. It just seems a lot of people who watch anime expect those kinds of motivations to be spoonfed to them. While those characters serve the purpose of motivating Inyuashiki down the path of good, they're largely irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Why should the author spend more time than necessary coming up with some kind of forced tragic backstory on why the kids are fucking awful human beings?
Anyway, putting enough details to showcase something and leaving the viewer/reader to fill in some blanks isn't necessarily a bad way to go about telling a story. Some people can get into that, some people cant i suppose.
Rehls said:
So that's the view you got? But you're assuming that the story told that it was nothing more than that. It just didn't bother to go in detail, giving each kid some backstory. Can't you just imagine those kids being stressed at school, having family issues and such? The kid at the end saying how their lives ended, didn't have much a delinquent-look; he looked nerd-ish, so I can easily imagine he being with those kids because of the want to have friends (as in school he mustn't have been popular).
But I mean, do you really have to 'gulp'? If you feel in in doubt, you could always google the answers, couldn't ya? When I did so for the kids' actions, I found news about it.
Thinking about a poster saying that in the manga there were scenes that added more characterization to the kids... I realized that problem with you guys is that you don't know those characters--or not enough, to accept them being true. And well, it's 2017... But yeah, it'd be superior storytelling if it told more about them instead of assuming everyone knows them, and well.
The kids is just an example I gave. I feel like when you are going to do a scene where a bunch of kids want to KILL somebody, there should be atleast some context given to it. It can't be because these kids just have hearts of stones and want to see people suffer. Again, the nature of murdering a human being isn't something most people, let alone kids, want to do. Yet these kids look like they genuinely relish and love the idea of seeing someone suffer. If there is some reason why they are doing it, it clearly is not shown as anything more than these kids being absolute psychopaths and the worst human beings who have ever existed since Hitler.
I can list more examples. The main character himself is a saint. He is such a nice human being who is incapable of doing a single morally wrong thing with his life. He has just been burdened with not being as successful and looking too old. Again, these things dont make him a bad person. Its just features that manipulate the audience to pity him and the writers play his character completely as such. In jus the first episode, this guy has mega cry fests with an adorable dog, that somehow his kids are less enthused than he is about.
You guys can say we are not supposed to get a full arc about the kids, but thats not the point. The point is that every character in this show so far has been shown to either be absolutely good human beings who have things in their lives that are shown for the sole purpose of having the audience pity them (ironically you guys say the kids aren't supposed to have a background, but the homeless guy they wanna kill gets a couple scenes showing that his life is about to turn around and his wife is going to take him back, very likely for the sole reason the audience pities him and cares about his survival, while hating the kids even more) or absolute vile dogshit humans.