New
Jan 29, 2018 8:52 PM
#51
cageofroses said: Using the term sjw seriously in 2018... do any of you actually go outside Most pieces of media are political in one way or another. Sorry to tell ya. Also can I get some examples of 'sjws' ruining cartoons and movies and stuff or are you just complaining about people that don't usually get represented.... being represented? I've seen people talking about how Funimation is dubbing incorrectly and adding stuff about patriarchy and sexism in Kobayashi Dragon maid and others. I'd prefer subbing and dubbing be done correctly without unnecessary additions. |
Jan 29, 2018 9:10 PM
#52
I said something similar and got essays of insults and racism thrown at me. Then, the mod got offended and tried to say it was against the rules and deleted it, and wouldn't comment. You seem to be pretty lucky so far. I think it will happen eventually. They already tried to get Japan to ban sexual abuse or something along those lines in manga and anime, but Japan can't just get rid of the tentacle monsters and high school girls. |
Jan 29, 2018 10:34 PM
#53
Pullman said: mruize85 said: Pullman said: mruize85 said: Pullman said: [...] Both sides are equally full of shit and try to make everything about race or sexuality, but I just encounter way less SJWs than alt-right guys whining about SJWs. The life itself is about family (race) and sex (sexuality), so... yes, they will try to make everything about race or sexuality. sounds like a bit of a stretch to me tbh. Family is one thing, race is another. You do know that there are mixed race families? And I don't know about you, but sexuality has never played a big role in my 28 years of life. I don't ask people about their sexual orientation before I talk to them because it is irrelevant to my opinion of them. I judge their values and actions and not who they fuck or what they fap to. I am aware that people like you who seem to think it's all about race and sex exist, I just vehemently disagree and I don't see you having any arguments aside from 'it is because I say it is' either so for now I won't change my mind. It's a choice you're making if everything is about race or gender to you. But it's not a god-given law, because there are no such things. My point is that a lot of the issues that are discussed in racia terms for example, are in fact more about class/poverty rather than about race, and they certainly don't have to be about race if you try to solve them from the poverty angle. I know there's a lot of history that lead to black people being more likely to be poor but you can't change history. And I'd rather focus on solving the problem of their poverty, than turning it into a race issue whose solution is what? Make them white? You can't change race and the history behind it, but you can change economic factors that lead to poverty. Making it about race just distracts from the real, solvable issues. You can judge people purely by merit if you want to, or you can have stuff like affirmative action that makes race a key component in whether you get into a college or university. Not everything that is about race has to be. This is not about you or me. This is about the average of the 7.500.000.000 people living in this planet. And whites are only 1/7 th of the whole. Ask to Abraham or Muhammad if they will be happy to see their daughter dating a <put some other race/ethnic group/culture/religion/etc. here>... Well, I'm not saying it's not how things are in a lot of places, I'm just saying it doesn't have to be like that. As a society, as individuals the choice is up to us, at least in democratic countries. There already has been a lot of progress compared to historical times, which was only possible because people did not see the status quo as unchangeable. You do realize this topic is one big circlejerk, right? Even if I agree with everything you said you of all people should know you can't win nor learn anything in this subject because people are too afraid thinking about what you said. I'm surprised you even got reactions. |
Jan 29, 2018 10:55 PM
#54
holysauron said: Pullman said: mruize85 said: Pullman said: mruize85 said: Pullman said: [...] Both sides are equally full of shit and try to make everything about race or sexuality, but I just encounter way less SJWs than alt-right guys whining about SJWs. The life itself is about family (race) and sex (sexuality), so... yes, they will try to make everything about race or sexuality. sounds like a bit of a stretch to me tbh. Family is one thing, race is another. You do know that there are mixed race families? And I don't know about you, but sexuality has never played a big role in my 28 years of life. I don't ask people about their sexual orientation before I talk to them because it is irrelevant to my opinion of them. I judge their values and actions and not who they fuck or what they fap to. I am aware that people like you who seem to think it's all about race and sex exist, I just vehemently disagree and I don't see you having any arguments aside from 'it is because I say it is' either so for now I won't change my mind. It's a choice you're making if everything is about race or gender to you. But it's not a god-given law, because there are no such things. My point is that a lot of the issues that are discussed in racia terms for example, are in fact more about class/poverty rather than about race, and they certainly don't have to be about race if you try to solve them from the poverty angle. I know there's a lot of history that lead to black people being more likely to be poor but you can't change history. And I'd rather focus on solving the problem of their poverty, than turning it into a race issue whose solution is what? Make them white? You can't change race and the history behind it, but you can change economic factors that lead to poverty. Making it about race just distracts from the real, solvable issues. You can judge people purely by merit if you want to, or you can have stuff like affirmative action that makes race a key component in whether you get into a college or university. Not everything that is about race has to be. This is not about you or me. This is about the average of the 7.500.000.000 people living in this planet. And whites are only 1/7 th of the whole. Ask to Abraham or Muhammad if they will be happy to see their daughter dating a <put some other race/ethnic group/culture/religion/etc. here>... Well, I'm not saying it's not how things are in a lot of places, I'm just saying it doesn't have to be like that. As a society, as individuals the choice is up to us, at least in democratic countries. There already has been a lot of progress compared to historical times, which was only possible because people did not see the status quo as unchangeable. You do realize this topic is one big circlejerk, right? Even if I agree with everything you said you of all people should know you can't win nor learn anything in this subject because people are too afraid thinking about what you said. I'm surprised you even got reactions. Well, you gotta try sometimes. I enjoy writing my walls of text anyway, because I'm that self-indulgent, so there's no harm done :> |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 29, 2018 11:04 PM
#55
Jan 30, 2018 7:10 AM
#56
BadSuns said: cageofroses said: Using the term sjw seriously in 2018... do any of you actually go outside Most pieces of media are political in one way or another. Sorry to tell ya. Also can I get some examples of 'sjws' ruining cartoons and movies and stuff or are you just complaining about people that don't usually get represented.... being represented? I've seen people talking about how Funimation is dubbing incorrectly and adding stuff about patriarchy and sexism in Kobayashi Dragon maid and others. I'd prefer subbing and dubbing be done correctly without unnecessary additions. That's a funny choice since I know there are those (that some people in this thread would call 'sjws') that got upset about a line change in that as well. Personally if something that's localized keeps the same feel or idea behind a scene, then I don't see the issue unless it's something huge like changing the entire plot, character relationships, etc. On the other hand I also don't mind changes that get rid of or change racist imagery, sexualization of kids, and such. |
Jan 30, 2018 7:29 AM
#57
Pullman said: holysauron said: You do realize this topic is one big circlejerk, right? Even if I agree with everything you said you of all people should know you can't win nor learn anything in this subject because people are too afraid thinking about what you said. I'm surprised you even got reactions. Well, you gotta try sometimes. I enjoy writing my walls of text anyway, because I'm that self-indulgent, so there's no harm done :> Is it just me or OP abandonned his sinking thread right after you fired your volley? Maybe it doesn't feel like a safe space anymore... |
Jan 30, 2018 1:23 PM
#58
*Still waiting for Japs to care for Western audiences and their opinions* >monthly/weekly sale of anime in the west when?! |
Jan 30, 2018 2:02 PM
#59
_Ako_ said: *Still waiting for Japs to care for Western audiences and their opinions* >monthly/weekly sale of anime in the west when?! I don't. It's their media, made specially for them, and this is what makes it what it is. Globalism is a World destructor. |
Jan 30, 2018 3:06 PM
#60
Pullman said: You're thinking of 4chan. Yeah MAL, I don't really frequent reddit or tumblr at all. But really, are SJWs dominating reddit? I thought that was all trump voters these days. Isn't that where the alt-right was born basically? That said I'm not sure how many of them are actually alt-right, it's just that SJW tend to display their stupidity in the public, shouting people down at events and parading with stupid signs (sometime wearing stupid costumes or just going topless altogether), so they are easier to meme. Alt-righters are keyboard warriors. |
I'm not a lolicon, you're just projecting your tendency to lewd 2D characters. If your favourite character is Tsutsukakushi Tsukiko, you are my soul mate. Been a long time since I've been here, I'll continue expressing myself freely and believe everyone should too. My MAL Interview |
Jan 30, 2018 3:55 PM
#61
BurningSpirit said: Pullman said: You're thinking of 4chan. Yeah MAL, I don't really frequent reddit or tumblr at all. But really, are SJWs dominating reddit? I thought that was all trump voters these days. Isn't that where the alt-right was born basically? That said I'm not sure how many of them are actually alt-right, it's just that SJW tend to display their stupidity in the public, shouting people down at events and parading with stupid signs (sometime wearing stupid costumes or just going topless altogether), so they are easier to meme. Alt-righters are keyboard warriors. Oh yeah, admittedly those two kinda blend into one in my head. I suck at the nuances of internet culture ^^. |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 30, 2018 3:56 PM
#62
Japan actually cares about making money instead of pandering to degenerates and losers... wait a minute... forget what I just said. |
Jan 30, 2018 3:58 PM
#63
That's impossible, because Japan and anime = hentai rape. https://www.forbes.com/sites/olliebarder/2016/03/03/japanese-response-to-un-proposed-ban-for-media-depicting-sexual-violence-is-cogent-and-sane/#4f3181d15b3e |
Be thankful for the wisdom granted to you. |
Jan 30, 2018 5:49 PM
#64
cageofroses said: BadSuns said: cageofroses said: Using the term sjw seriously in 2018... do any of you actually go outside Most pieces of media are political in one way or another. Sorry to tell ya. Also can I get some examples of 'sjws' ruining cartoons and movies and stuff or are you just complaining about people that don't usually get represented.... being represented? I've seen people talking about how Funimation is dubbing incorrectly and adding stuff about patriarchy and sexism in Kobayashi Dragon maid and others. I'd prefer subbing and dubbing be done correctly without unnecessary additions. That's a funny choice since I know there are those (that some people in this thread would call 'sjws') that got upset about a line change in that as well. Personally if something that's localized keeps the same feel or idea behind a scene, then I don't see the issue unless it's something huge like changing the entire plot, character relationships, etc. On the other hand I also don't mind changes that get rid of or change racist imagery, sexualization of kids, and such. Well changes did at times made it only worse like Prison School with the Gamergate line. But SJW's never ruined things. Political correctness doesn't ruin things, Bad writing does but ppl rather blame it on being SJW instead of being poorly written. Just look at Steven's universe, it is pretty dam Political correct, is it bad? NO!!! In fact many ppl find it veery well written and enjoyable. Oh and Devilman Crybaby was made and streams on Netflix, so Will Japan get hit by SJW? Nope. |
Jan 30, 2018 5:58 PM
#65
From the videos I've seen about SJWs, I would say they are rash people that fight in terms of their emotional overview rather than logic, and statistics. I wouldn't be scared about their involvement to take away our enjoyment because in the end, these shows are just characters drawn and written: they are simply just fiction. Moreover, it seems no one really know that when debating with an SJW, you evidently 'lose' regardless if you were factually superior. It's just in their nature to be right through hypocritical means of morality. TL:DR SJWs are unreasonable, so you shouldn't care. |
Jan 30, 2018 6:22 PM
#66
Bourmegar said: Well changes did at times made it only worse like Prison School with the Gamergate line. But SJW's never ruined things. Political correctness doesn't ruin things, Bad writing does but ppl rather blame it on being SJW instead of being poorly written. Just look at Steven's universe, it is pretty dam Political correct, is it bad? NO!!! In fact many ppl find it veery well written and enjoyable. Oh and Devilman Crybaby was made and streams on Netflix, so Will Japan get hit by SJW? Nope. Now this whole post is something I can agree on. People get so scared of political correctness that the moment there is any, people scream SJWs, regardless of if the writing is good or not. |
Jan 30, 2018 10:40 PM
#67
This sounds like a clash of cultures type of deal, and Japan is pretty well known for not giving a shit about other cultures when it comes to stuff like this. |
Jan 30, 2018 10:42 PM
#68
Why do anime fans get pissed at the thought of something trying to be, "politically correct"? It's immature and juvenile. These same people criticize anime that try to be, "edgy" yet their reactions are often as, if not more, edgier. To answer your question, I doubt it'l lever happen. Japan didn't give a shit about foreigners a couple 100 years ago. It still doesn't seem to give much of a shit about it now. @mihyon Entertainment influences people, at least on a subconscious psychological level. To label all SJW's as irrational, is an insult to Martin Luther King Jr, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and countless other historical figures. Without SJW's, nobody would have rights: in America, women wouldn't be allowed to vote, or drive in Saudi Arabia. @Bourmegar I feel like you are one of the most rational people on MAL, even more rational than me. @GlennMagusHarvey Oh hey, another shitposter who posts purely to increase their post count and complain. |
removed-userJan 30, 2018 10:49 PM
Jan 30, 2018 10:53 PM
#69
NihilisticLoner said: Why do anime fans get pissed at the thought of something trying to be, "politically correct"? It's immature and juvenile. These same people criticize anime that try to be, "edgy" yet their reactions are often as, if not more, edgier. To answer your question, I doubt it'l lever happen. Japan didn't give a shit about foreigners a couple 100 years ago. It still doesn't seem to give much of a shit about it now. @mihyon Entertainment influences people, at least on a subconscious psychological level. To label all SJW's as irrational, is an insult to Martin Luther King Jr, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and countless other historical figures. Without SJW's, nobody would have rights: in America, women wouldn't be allowed to vote, or drive in Saudi Arabia. When I refered to SJWs, I'm talking about modern day ones. The ones that recieved all the coverage and hate through the media. The ones we perceive that are irrational and crazed. If you read what I wrote, I said "from the videos I've seen", sorry if you were offended but I truly didn't mean any harm. Political correctness isn't an issue, but if it's enforced overwhelmingly then that's an issue. It's a form of censorship, where one can't speak openly about controversial topics. It restricts free speech and the ability to have an open mind. I hope you understand where I'm coming from. |
Jan 30, 2018 10:59 PM
#70
mihyon said: NihilisticLoner said: Why do anime fans get pissed at the thought of something trying to be, "politically correct"? It's immature and juvenile. These same people criticize anime that try to be, "edgy" yet their reactions are often as, if not more, edgier. To answer your question, I doubt it'l lever happen. Japan didn't give a shit about foreigners a couple 100 years ago. It still doesn't seem to give much of a shit about it now. @mihyon Entertainment influences people, at least on a subconscious psychological level. To label all SJW's as irrational, is an insult to Martin Luther King Jr, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and countless other historical figures. Without SJW's, nobody would have rights: in America, women wouldn't be allowed to vote, or drive in Saudi Arabia. When I refered to SJWs, I'm talking about modern day ones. The ones that recieved all the coverage and hate through the media. The ones we perceive that are irrational and crazed. If you read what I wrote, I said "from the videos I've seen", sorry if you were offended but I truly didn't mean any harm. Political correctness isn't an issue, but if it's enforced overwhelmingly then that's an issue. It's a form of censorship, where one can't speak openly about controversial topics. It restricts free speech and the ability to have an open mind. I hope you understand where I'm coming from. Sorry. I read the part where you mentioned videos specifically, but at the moment, I was just pissed so I...glossed over it? I dunno, anger's a weird thing. Well, I'm hot-headed, so yeah. Okay, fine: so I understand why people hate crazy sjw's. But why does the MAL community seem to always lose their fuck shit the moment anybody mentions anything relating to sjw's or race or gender representation? I once made a thread asking why the anime community excuses misrepresentation of skin color, and many people were blowing up. WTF is wrong with telling people that you wish that the entertainment you enjoy, improved itself? |
Jan 30, 2018 11:06 PM
#71
NihilisticLoner said: I don't give a flying fuck about my post count, and you can see my entire post history if you want, by looking up my name.@GlennMagusHarvey Oh hey, another shitposter who posts purely to increase their post count and complain. And I stand by my comment. I'm tired of this stupid shadowboxing against SJWs. I see people complaining about SJWs like 10000 times more often than I see the fabled "SJWs" they so hate (I think I've seen a grand total of one on this forum, and that was months ago). Not to mention that some people use opposition to political correctness to shield themselves from criticism when other people tell them that they're being rude and obnoxious, so I have every reason to be skeptical of their motives. |
Avatar character is Gabriel from Gabriel DropOut. |
Jan 30, 2018 11:07 PM
#72
NihilisticLoner said: mihyon said: NihilisticLoner said: Why do anime fans get pissed at the thought of something trying to be, "politically correct"? It's immature and juvenile. These same people criticize anime that try to be, "edgy" yet their reactions are often as, if not more, edgier. To answer your question, I doubt it'l lever happen. Japan didn't give a shit about foreigners a couple 100 years ago. It still doesn't seem to give much of a shit about it now. @mihyon Entertainment influences people, at least on a subconscious psychological level. To label all SJW's as irrational, is an insult to Martin Luther King Jr, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and countless other historical figures. Without SJW's, nobody would have rights: in America, women wouldn't be allowed to vote, or drive in Saudi Arabia. When I refered to SJWs, I'm talking about modern day ones. The ones that recieved all the coverage and hate through the media. The ones we perceive that are irrational and crazed. If you read what I wrote, I said "from the videos I've seen", sorry if you were offended but I truly didn't mean any harm. Political correctness isn't an issue, but if it's enforced overwhelmingly then that's an issue. It's a form of censorship, where one can't speak openly about controversial topics. It restricts free speech and the ability to have an open mind. I hope you understand where I'm coming from. Sorry. I read the part where you mentioned videos specifically, but at the moment, I was just pissed so I...glossed over it? I dunno, anger's a weird thing. Well, I'm hot-headed, so yeah. Okay, fine: so I understand why people hate crazy sjw's. But why does the MAL community seem to always lose their fuck shit the moment anybody mentions anything relating to sjw's or race or gender representation? I once made a thread asking why the anime community excuses misrepresentation of skin color, and many people were blowing up. WTF is wrong with telling people that you wish that the entertainment you enjoy, improved itself? I'm not sure if I fully understood what you wrote, but below is what I thought. I haven't been a member of MAL for the time you've spent here. But from what I've seen before in other medias, people just like to defend what they like. Say someone purchased shoes for $500, and they told their peers. Obviously, there will be some backlash on why they spent $500 on shoes. In the end, the person defends his purchase to justify his actions. It could be said the same for anything really. People just have a sense of duty to protect what they enjoy. Anyways, I'm going to leave it like this. Thanks for a good discussion! |
Jan 31, 2018 1:02 AM
#73
Pullman said: Oh boy, another anti-SJW whine thread that gets his facts from Breitbart or whatever rather than actual reality. Here we go. The reality I live in is very different and japan actually seems more closed-minded than western entertainment as a whole with their conservative culture, obsession with purity and virginity, censoring porn and having a lot of taboo topics that you will never see in their media/anime (like drugs for example). They are more open to the depiction of weird and questionable fetishes in their cartoons (and only their cartoons, their society in general is still extremely sexually repressed and even just being sexually active in the most conservative ways can ruin your career in certain jobs). But that is literally the only way in which japanese entertainment might have more freedom than western entertainment. There are a lot of topics that you'll never find in anime because it is taboo, period. In western media you can write about anything pretty much, and there's nothing that doesn't exist in some form. You really have to be an extremely dedicated weeaboo to convince yourself that japan has more creative freedom than other countries. Let's go through your list of stuff that makes anime so much better and less politically repressed to see how much sense it makes: 1. pervert acts lots of western media includes and openly talks about stuff like that. I just recently saw a whole comedy special of a guy mostly talking about his fetishes which included some very dirty and explicit stuff that anime would never ever talk about, like ass-liking or sucking transgender cock. In anime being a 'pervert' usually means wanting to sneak a peek at their panties or while they undress and that's it, or just generally having any sexual thoughts ever. Very tame stuff that I wouldn't even call perverted, just a healthy sexual interest. In western media I've seen much more perverted stuff. Anime just uses pervert for anyone who has sexual thoughts ever because the japanese society is so repressed, so it might seem like there is a lot of 'perversion' going on, but that's just because what the west treats as normal male behaviour gets called 'being a pervert' in anime all the time. That doesn't mean they are more open in their entertainment about fetishes and being a pervert. Not at all, rather the opposite is true. They trivialize the term pervert to mean literally anything sexual, which is just stupid and has nothing to do with perversion, which is something they almost never talk. There was HenSemi, but other than that I can't think of many anime that openly talk about real pervert stuff like fetishes. 2. man beating women I have barely seen this topic being seriously a thing in anime. It is solely used for gags, but domestic violence as a topic is kinda taboo in anime and you rarely see it. But even in anime the other way round is much more popular. So not sure what you mean by that, just seems like bullshit if you ask me. Also are you implying that men beating the shit out of women inherently makes a story better? That's fucked up, bro. With stuff like this it matters what they make of it, not just the quantity of how often women get beated by men. Only a sicko would care about the numbers more than the context. 3. no minority or racial quota for the cast Yeah because Japan doesn't have a lot of minorities and the ones they have are still asian so it's not like you could easily tell the difference. Different societies and different realities lead to different fiction. America is not homogenous, it is not a white supremacy and thinking all your media should look like it is, is disturbing. While in Japan it makes sense because their society really is like that. 4. harem with male protagonists and 3, 4 or more girls True, harem is an anime specific genre pretty much. I'll give you that one. Not that anime is good at it, mind you. They have a dozen tropes and rinse and repeat them all the time when there is so much more you could do with a harem setup. But well, actual sexual content is one of those taboo topics in anime. They are just too open-minded and not politically correct to ever really include sex in their harems. That must be it. Not like it's their personal form of political correctness. No, of course not. 5. objectification of female characters (aka fan service) Seriously? Have you never watched TV? There is just as much fanservice and objectification in western media, it's just different. You get to see way more sex scenes in a lot of TV shows than you'd ever need for the narrative, just because viewers like to see naked women moaning. Naked women are everywhere in hollywood movies or series. You'd really have to blind and ignorant to not see that this is a reality. In anime you get panty shots or awkward falling scenes, in western series you get the full nudity and actual sex scenes. Tell me which fanservice is more tame, more repressed? 6.animal beating ??? Not sure which anime this even refers to or why you think that animals have never been beaten in western media. You're just desperately grasping at straws at this point. 7. swear words Oh yeah, anime swears much more than western media... This is the biggest bullshit I've ever seen. It really makes me think you never watched a single western series or movie and just get all of your knowledge about them from Breitbart or reddit. There are so many fucks being thrown around in so many series and movies, and I'm not even gonna talk about all the assholes, cunts, pussies and millions of other swear words western entertainment includes on a daily basis. What's the worst swearing you ever heard in anime? Piece of shit? Fucking Bastard? Again, anime is tame in that regard, partly because japanese society is much more tame with swearing and part because a lot of anime is aimed at younger kids. 8. gore and gruesome scenes has literally nothing to do with political correctness at this point, and is also just more bullshit that shows me you have no idea of western media. Gruesome scenes in anime are child's play to the more gruesome scenes I've seen in western live action, or live action in general. 8. stereotypes In which context? Are you really trying to say that having more stereotypical depictions is inherently better than having well-rounded, realistic depictions of characters? How? That makes no sense to me. Sure, sometimes you can use them for comedy (and that is still happening) but even that can get old quickly. 9. incest anime doesn't even go there a lot of the time and finds excuses with them not being blood related or whatever. It's mostly a bait genre in anime. And I'm sure you can find western fiction that deals with that topic too, and probably in more realistic and serious ways too because in anime it is almost always just for fanservice, with a handful of exceptions. 10 loli fetish Probably true, Japan is more open-minded in terms of drawn loli porn stuff and I'm glad for that. Just one niche-topic tho, and knowing a bit of the societal background of Japan (like it being legal for 14yo girls to prostitute themselves to older men in Tokyo) can shed some light on why they are more lenient with pedophilic stuff like that, even outside of fiction, which is a bit creepy. Not necessarily sure it's a good thing for japanese society to be that open about this stuff, but hey, I'm still thankful for loli doujins and appreciate japan for that. 11. hentai Yeah because porn doesn't exist in the west? The only thing you can say is that animated porn specifically is more professional in japan, there is a whole industry. There is also a shitton of animated western porn, but it's mostly done by amateurs as far as I know. But the censorship of a lot of hentai and live action porn in japan makes them still lose in the overall porn comparison imo. So yeah, you have a point in like 2 out of these 11 things you listed, while for the rest it is either irrelevant or the west actually has more to offer. Please open your eyes and stop glorifying Japan. And this next part is big and bold because I want everyone to read it. It is the heart of this whole topic and why I can never take people seriously when they rant about western media being ruined my SJWs. THE MERE EXISTENCE OF CHARACTERS THAT BELONG TO RACIAL OR SEXUAL MINORITIES HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. IT IS PART OF (WESTERN/AMERICAN) REALITY THAT THESE PEOPLE LIVE IN OUR SOCIETY AND PRETENDING IT ISN'T BY EXCLUDING THOSE GROUPS FROM ALL MEDIA AND FICTION SET IN OUR SOCIETY IS A MUCH MORE OF A POLITICAL AGENDA THAN AUTHORS JUST DECIDING TO INCLUDE THEM BECAUSE THEY ARE REAL AND CAN BRING VARIETY TO A CAST. DIVERSITY IS THE REALITY, WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT, AND TRYING TO FORCE FICTION TO TWIST THAT REALITY TO FIT YOUR PERSONAL PREFERENCES IS WHAT YOU ARE DOING AND ALLEGEDLY CRITICISING AND THE SAME TIME. WHICH IS THE DEFINITION OF HYPOCRISY. IT IS IN THE 'HOW IS SOMETHING DEPICTED' THAT POLITICAL CORRECTNESS BECOMES RELEVANT, BUT ONLY IN A NEGATIVE SENSE. IT SIMPLY REFERS TO THE ABSENCE OF PREJUDICE IN THEIR DEPICTION, TREATING THEM LIKE NORMAL HUMANS AND NOT AS ABOMINATIONS OR WALKING STEREOTYPES WITHOUT ANY REAL AGENCY. IT'S NOT SOMETHING YOU PUT INTO A WORK OF FICTION, IT IS MERELY THE ABSENCE OF ANY POLITICALLY OR RACIALLY MOTIVATED STEREOTYPICAL DEPICTIONS. Anyone who has a problem with that kind of 'political correctness' is just a bigot, period. They can't handle that things are portrayed in realistic, normal ways and not just to be made fun of because their political bigotry doesn't allow them to tolerate or 'normalize' these minority groups, so they try and turn it around and say everything that doesn't fit THEIR political agend is part of the political agenda of their enemies, when that is simply not true. You don't need a political agenda as a writer to value realism and variety in your cast, that's just a basic thing. You look at reality and get inspired. And since gay people and non-white people are part of that reality that inspires writers, they will be part of their works as well. It's just common sense. It's people like you OP who politicize these works, not the authors themselves. At least most of the time. The negative reputation political correctness gets is probably mostly linked to the people who take it too far and try to bring it into the realm of jokes and laughs. And that is bullshit. You can joke about anything, and saying a joke is politically incorrect is not a criticism, it's praise. So I understand everyone who wants to punch those humorless people who complain about comedians or comedies not being politically correct. Fuck you, that's not their job. As long as it's clear their not seriously saying it, you can joke about jews being gassed or child rape as far as I'm concerned. There should be no taboo topics in comedy, and I'll fight the extremists who want comedy to be politically correct. But it is ridiculous to project this into every other kind of entertainment like I see it happening all the time, and see the mere presence of anyone black or gay or fat as a political agenda of the 'liberal SJW cucks' or whatever. On the opposite, we are finally entering a phase in western entertainment where it is stopping to adhere to political agendas by only including white heteros even tho the reality of most western societies are much more diverse than that and have been for quite some time. We are simply stopping to twist the view of reality we depict in our entertainment, but somehow the anti-SJW whiners managed to convince themselves that the only unpolitical way of making entertainment is for it to be white and hetero only, with an emphasis on men over women. If you deviate from that, you're writing politically correct garbage that was forced upon you by some political agenda bla bla bla. These stupid opinions are so fucking delusional that they would not be worth listening to if they weren't as numerous. But even if they are numerous, they are still largely bullshit and just the scared whining of people who want to pretend they live in a white supremacy and are angry that their fiction is starting to break that immersion by becoming more representative of reality. Oh wow. I can't believe you bothered with such a reply to stupid topic like this, that will just reappear again with in few days with different poster and title. Anyway, I have nothing to add here. Wish I could just +1 it. |
Jan 31, 2018 3:58 AM
#74
NihilisticLoner said: mihyon said: NihilisticLoner said: Why do anime fans get pissed at the thought of something trying to be, "politically correct"? It's immature and juvenile. These same people criticize anime that try to be, "edgy" yet their reactions are often as, if not more, edgier. To answer your question, I doubt it'l lever happen. Japan didn't give a shit about foreigners a couple 100 years ago. It still doesn't seem to give much of a shit about it now. @mihyon Entertainment influences people, at least on a subconscious psychological level. To label all SJW's as irrational, is an insult to Martin Luther King Jr, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and countless other historical figures. Without SJW's, nobody would have rights: in America, women wouldn't be allowed to vote, or drive in Saudi Arabia. When I refered to SJWs, I'm talking about modern day ones. The ones that recieved all the coverage and hate through the media. The ones we perceive that are irrational and crazed. If you read what I wrote, I said "from the videos I've seen", sorry if you were offended but I truly didn't mean any harm. Political correctness isn't an issue, but if it's enforced overwhelmingly then that's an issue. It's a form of censorship, where one can't speak openly about controversial topics. It restricts free speech and the ability to have an open mind. I hope you understand where I'm coming from. Sorry. I read the part where you mentioned videos specifically, but at the moment, I was just pissed so I...glossed over it? I dunno, anger's a weird thing. Well, I'm hot-headed, so yeah. Okay, fine: so I understand why people hate crazy sjw's. But why does the MAL community seem to always lose their fuck shit the moment anybody mentions anything relating to sjw's or race or gender representation? I once made a thread asking why the anime community excuses misrepresentation of skin color, and many people were blowing up. WTF is wrong with telling people that you wish that the entertainment you enjoy, improved itself? @Pullman Well some ppl just want to protdct their hobby from what they believe is bad (even if they are wrong) and like to label ppl. And that label came from the crazy SJWs and asking about such stuff as race fits in that label it seems. It is just easy for them to blame a group instead of looking what actually ruined "their Medium" like bad writing (Like with Marvel comics). Steven's universe is Political correct and nobody comllains about it, why? Because many ppl found it to be well written with enjoyable characters. Plus The west is not completely PC. Stand up comedians are still Political incorrect and now even get Netflix contracts just to name an example. The only 2 things I wish These SJW would not do is: censorship of free speech and being obnoxious. |
Jan 31, 2018 4:05 AM
#75
Neet said: SJW's are never relevant. But anime has gotten more politically correct lately, you see a lot more gay characters or "trap" characters etc nowadays. Which is hardly a concern imo. That's due to demand. Anime/Manga might not be politically correct in the western sense but it's been kinda "by misfits, for misfits" for a long time now. Afaik there is no socio-political pressure to produce more gay stuff in Japan but there does seem to be market incentives, just check out YoI sales. |
Jan 31, 2018 8:58 AM
#76
Bourmegar said: NihilisticLoner said: mihyon said: NihilisticLoner said: Why do anime fans get pissed at the thought of something trying to be, "politically correct"? It's immature and juvenile. These same people criticize anime that try to be, "edgy" yet their reactions are often as, if not more, edgier. To answer your question, I doubt it'l lever happen. Japan didn't give a shit about foreigners a couple 100 years ago. It still doesn't seem to give much of a shit about it now. @mihyon Entertainment influences people, at least on a subconscious psychological level. To label all SJW's as irrational, is an insult to Martin Luther King Jr, Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, and countless other historical figures. Without SJW's, nobody would have rights: in America, women wouldn't be allowed to vote, or drive in Saudi Arabia. When I refered to SJWs, I'm talking about modern day ones. The ones that recieved all the coverage and hate through the media. The ones we perceive that are irrational and crazed. If you read what I wrote, I said "from the videos I've seen", sorry if you were offended but I truly didn't mean any harm. Political correctness isn't an issue, but if it's enforced overwhelmingly then that's an issue. It's a form of censorship, where one can't speak openly about controversial topics. It restricts free speech and the ability to have an open mind. I hope you understand where I'm coming from. Sorry. I read the part where you mentioned videos specifically, but at the moment, I was just pissed so I...glossed over it? I dunno, anger's a weird thing. Well, I'm hot-headed, so yeah. Okay, fine: so I understand why people hate crazy sjw's. But why does the MAL community seem to always lose their fuck shit the moment anybody mentions anything relating to sjw's or race or gender representation? I once made a thread asking why the anime community excuses misrepresentation of skin color, and many people were blowing up. WTF is wrong with telling people that you wish that the entertainment you enjoy, improved itself? @Pullman Well some ppl just want to protdct their hobby from what they believe is bad (even if they are wrong) and like to label ppl. And that label came from the crazy SJWs and asking about such stuff as race fits in that label it seems. It is just easy for them to blame a group instead of looking what actually ruined "their Medium" like bad writing (Like with Marvel comics). Steven's universe is Political correct and nobody comllains about it, why? Because many ppl found it to be well written with enjoyable characters. Plus The west is not completely PC. Stand up comedians are still Political incorrect and now even get Netflix contracts just to name an example. The only 2 things I wish These SJW would not do is: censorship of free speech and being obnoxious. I wish nobody complained about Stevens Universe because I love the show and it's become one of my alltime favorites, but I've seen a lot of people shit on it. On the one hand just for being, well, open-minded and tolerant and having a fat MC (people fucking hate fat MCs, see Accel World reception) as well as for including topics like homosexuality and diversity. But I've also seen SJW essays of X pages analyzing how deeply racist SU apparently is. Just goes to show that the maniacs on both sides will never be satisfied unless they can shit on something. Shitting on stuff and ranting is what gives their life meaning and it's funny that they don't realize how similar they are to each other, how dependent they are on the other side to provide them with situations to complain about. |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 31, 2018 9:05 AM
#77
cageofroses said: Using the term sjw seriously in 2018... do any of you actually go outside Most pieces of media are political in one way or another. Sorry to tell ya. Also can I get some examples of 'sjws' ruining cartoons and movies and stuff or are you just complaining about people that don't usually get represented.... being represented? Sjw detected. Especially with the "represented" bullshit. Go away you evil being. |
Jan 31, 2018 9:17 AM
#78
-Elegant- said: zodd0 said: These threads are always so retarded. They serve no point other than for "nationalists" to rant like drooling morons and pat each other on the back. "-Country : Sweden" Okay......... SWEDEN YES what a classic, laughed my ass off |
Imagination is a weapon. Those who don't use it die first. |
Jan 31, 2018 11:35 AM
#79
That intellectual level of yours... |
Jan 31, 2018 12:28 PM
#80
Bourmegar said: There have been people saying that anime was for deviants long before "SJW" was a thing.Well some ppl just want to protdct their hobby from what they believe is bad (even if they are wrong) and like to label ppl. And that label came from the crazy SJWs and asking about such stuff as race fits in that label it seems. Monad said: SJW detected. Posting a show with a female protagonist.cageofroses said: Using the term sjw seriously in 2018... do any of you actually go outside Most pieces of media are political in one way or another. Sorry to tell ya. Also can I get some examples of 'sjws' ruining cartoons and movies and stuff or are you just complaining about people that don't usually get represented.... being represented? Sjw detected. Especially with the "represented" bullshit. Go away you evil being. |
Avatar character is Gabriel from Gabriel DropOut. |
Jan 31, 2018 12:35 PM
#81
Monad said: cageofroses said: Using the term sjw seriously in 2018... do any of you actually go outside Most pieces of media are political in one way or another. Sorry to tell ya. Also can I get some examples of 'sjws' ruining cartoons and movies and stuff or are you just complaining about people that don't usually get represented.... being represented? Sjw detected. Especially with the "represented" bullshit. Go away you evil being. the use of buffy is so fuckin funny considering the topic. Anyway you wanna answer the question or nah? |
Jan 31, 2018 1:53 PM
#83
cageofroses said: well there is the comic division of marvel, their need for "representation" has become a joke about how many things they could jam into one character, sure its the bad writing and decisions being made thats the problem, but it was all made because of the SJW way of "representation", killing off or otherwise sidelining/changing popular characters that are especially popular due to current movies/tv just to push a more SJW approved character in their spot (with the assumed hope that the original characters popularity will be helpful in pushing their ideology). They also hired writers partly due to their race and sexual orientation (openly admitted). Due to their priorities most of the things that were created would be considered subpar to the point that even store owners were complaining how this affected their business..... of course they tried to lay the blame of their failings on the fans and some even attacked the fans in the comics, but luckily a lot of these comics are FINALLY getting cancelledUsing the term sjw seriously in 2018... do any of you actually go outside Most pieces of media are political in one way or another. Sorry to tell ya. Also can I get some examples of 'sjws' ruining cartoons and movies and stuff or are you just complaining about people that don't usually get represented.... being represented? also as someone who pretty much watches all of the comic tv shows the clear and annoying SJW-shit in Legends of tomorrow and supergirl made me have to drop them, like seriously its so over the top (i assume you havent watched them if you have to even ask this question lol) in short, dont fall into the same trap that racism deniers often do "i havent seen any sign of it around me so obviously its not a thing" |
Jan 31, 2018 2:23 PM
#84
Killaclown said: cageofroses said: well there is the comic division of marvel, their need for "representation" has become a joke about how many things they could jam into one character, sure its the bad writing and decisions being made thats the problem, but it was all made because of the SJW way of "representation", killing off or otherwise sidelining/changing popular characters that are especially popular due to current movies/tv just to push a more SJW approved character in their spot (with the assumed hope that the original characters popularity will be helpful in pushing their ideology). They also hired writers partly due to their race and sexual orientation (openly admitted). Due to their priorities most of the things that were created would be considered subpar to the point that even store owners were complaining how this affected their business..... of course they tried to lay the blame of their failings on the fans and some even attacked the fans in the comics, but luckily a lot of these comics are FINALLY getting cancelledUsing the term sjw seriously in 2018... do any of you actually go outside Most pieces of media are political in one way or another. Sorry to tell ya. Also can I get some examples of 'sjws' ruining cartoons and movies and stuff or are you just complaining about people that don't usually get represented.... being represented? also as someone who pretty much watches all of the comic tv shows the clear and annoying SJW-shit in Legends of tomorrow and supergirl made me have to drop them, like seriously its so over the top (i assume you havent watched them if you have to even ask this question lol) in short, dont fall into the same trap that racism deniers often do "i havent seen any sign of it around me so obviously its not a thing" You do know you can be more than one thing, right? You can be black and gay, hispanic and bi, etc. Like what you call jamming things into one character is that. People like that exist. When it comes to comics, most of them are legacy characters. There can be more than one person that plays the role and not all of them have be the exact same thing. Complaining about them hiring minorities and people in the LGBT community to write stories for them is so weird. If they want to expand their characters and said characters' backgrounds, it makes sense to hire people that would actually know what they're talking about. What would you want instead? For them to only hire straight white people for everything? like? From your view point it seems that if anyone is hired at all and they're not straight or white, it's some sort of SJW power move. I don't watch a lot of the live action super hero tv shows, no. The cartoons were always more my thing. So I can't give any opinion on that unless you wanna give some examples of this 'annoying SJW-shit'. Not falling into any trap, lol, you guys just get so ruffled by the smallest of things and scream SJW just because you don't like something. |
Jan 31, 2018 2:28 PM
#85
I mean there was that time when UN legit tried to ban the production/distribution of hentai/doujins so the spoke with Japan about it and the Japanese representative basically told them to fuck off. So no, I think Japans good. |
AstZeroJan 31, 2018 2:32 PM
The beauty of humans is that they say one thing then do another, but at the same time that can also be their ugliest side. |
Jan 31, 2018 3:15 PM
#86
GlennMagusHarvey said: Bourmegar said: There have been people saying that anime was for deviants long before "SJW" was a thing.Well some ppl just want to protdct their hobby from what they believe is bad (even if they are wrong) and like to label ppl. And that label came from the crazy SJWs and asking about such stuff as race fits in that label it seems. Monad said: SJW detected. Posting a show with a female protagonist.cageofroses said: Using the term sjw seriously in 2018... do any of you actually go outside Most pieces of media are political in one way or another. Sorry to tell ya. Also can I get some examples of 'sjws' ruining cartoons and movies and stuff or are you just complaining about people that don't usually get represented.... being represented? Sjw detected. Especially with the "represented" bullshit. Go away you evil being. Hmm...the fact that you find any issue with an anti-sjw expression having a pic of a female protagonist just shows your and possibly general ignorance of what sjw and what anti-sjw people are or stand for. cageofroses said: Monad said: cageofroses said: Using the term sjw seriously in 2018... do any of you actually go outside Most pieces of media are political in one way or another. Sorry to tell ya. Also can I get some examples of 'sjws' ruining cartoons and movies and stuff or are you just complaining about people that don't usually get represented.... being represented? Sjw detected. Especially with the "represented" bullshit. Go away you evil being. the use of buffy is so fuckin funny considering the topic. See the above. You are no advocate for any good for women or humanity in general if you are an sjw. Sjw are self-indulging in a pretense that they supposedly care about some good to make them-selfs feel important. But in reality all you are if you are an sjw is illogical, unrealistic and destructive. Nothing is funnier than an sjw claiming the big white knight for women card while turning the eyes away with women getting raped left and right by Muslim gangs because "ma diversity". Now that is truly ironic. |
MonadJan 31, 2018 3:25 PM
Jan 31, 2018 3:25 PM
#87
cageofroses said: sure you can, but when people are doing it so often and with no subtlety whatsover it kind of becomes a joke where you can just imagine them ticking off boxes, or there talking with their friends "ooh make him handicapped too......wait did i say him?" both "oooooooh", just like its ridiculous when they do that with other things like powers or something, at a certain point it becomes humerous and is far from limited to only being made fun of when sjws do it. And yes they can and have done that with characters, never all at the same time (to this extent) though, and why, when and how they do it are important things that everyone who uses that argument clearly overlooks, though ive already explained how the way they went about it was TERRIBLE (as the sales agree)Killaclown said: cageofroses said: Using the term sjw seriously in 2018... do any of you actually go outside Most pieces of media are political in one way or another. Sorry to tell ya. Also can I get some examples of 'sjws' ruining cartoons and movies and stuff or are you just complaining about people that don't usually get represented.... being represented? also as someone who pretty much watches all of the comic tv shows the clear and annoying SJW-shit in Legends of tomorrow and supergirl made me have to drop them, like seriously its so over the top (i assume you havent watched them if you have to even ask this question lol) in short, dont fall into the same trap that racism deniers often do "i havent seen any sign of it around me so obviously its not a thing" You do know you can be more than one thing, right? You can be black and gay, hispanic and bi, etc. Like what you call jamming things into one character is that. People like that exist. When it comes to comics, most of them are legacy characters. There can be more than one person that plays the role and not all of them have be the exact same thing. Complaining about them hiring minorities and people in the LGBT community to write stories for them is so weird. If they want to expand their characters and said characters' backgrounds, it makes sense to hire people that would actually know what they're talking about. What would you want instead? For them to only hire straight white people for everything? like? From your view point it seems that if anyone is hired at all and they're not straight or white, it's some sort of SJW power move. I don't watch a lot of the live action super hero tv shows, no. The cartoons were always more my thing. So I can't give any opinion on that unless you wanna give some examples of this 'annoying SJW-shit'. Not falling into any trap, lol, you guys just get so ruffled by the smallest of things and scream SJW just because you don't like something. nah nah nah dont try and twist my words cathy newman hiring the best for the job should obviously be the main requirement, and when you change all these characters races and sexuality and even try to see how many points that you can fit into one character you are going to have problems when trying to match it with the writers.... also i would imagine it would put a lot of people out of the job, but hey whats wrong with hiring and firing people based on their race/sex/sexual orientation right? well its been awhile so i cant give that many examples but for the record i really tried with these 2, left somewhere in the 2nd season of both, at a certain point it just started to feel like a chore. For supergirl i remember in the first episode the boss character was being interviewed and of course the interview her calls her the most powerful woman in the city, which she then corrects to person in the city, which of course i would do to but the writers put that in there for obvious reasons that are so apparent considering how its done and how often. their were a lot with a lesbian character that came out but i can only remember a recent one since it was from the crossover where she has a one night stand with the lesbian from legends of tomorrow and then tells her sister that she feels like such a guy "gross". one of the worst offences has to be supergirls boyfriend who was like a walking example of "toxic masculinity", he even was called "the frat boy of the universe" lol. I wont get into any of the details of legends, ill just say due to the time travel aspect there was soooo much talk about sexism and racism it really felt like class instead of a superhero show... also constant reminders that one of the members was lesbian (and they killed off my fav. character!!!! not related lol) you were the one that didnt believe that it happened at all just because it didnt happen to you, sounds like the same thing.... hey if i cant complain about people ruining my geeky hobbies then i ask you WTF is the internet for? (besides porn of course) :p |
Jan 31, 2018 3:32 PM
#88
Fantastic writing flawlessly integrated into the work. It's so well done it's like you can't even tell there's an agenda! I hope anime gets writing this good soon. |
Jan 31, 2018 3:46 PM
#89
Monad said: See the above. You are no advocate for any good for women or humanity in general if you are an sjw. Sjw are self-indulging in a pretense that they supposedly care about some good to make them-selfs feel important. But in reality all you are if you are an sjw is illogical, unrealistic and destructive. Nothing is funnier than an sjw claiming the big white knight for women card while turning the eyes away with women getting raped left and right by Muslim gangs because "ma diversity". Now that is truly ironic. hey.... buddy.... I don't know how to tell you this but........... I'm a woman. You do also know that you can be aware of and care about all of these things right? The mention of one does not signify the forgetting of the other. Like these are completely different topics you're throwing together. I would even comment on the Muslim thing but that was just so completely out of left field and not at all what the thread is about and deserves its own conversation. I was also more taking note of the fact that Buffy, with its inclusion of what back then would have been considered strong female characters (and lots of them), along with some of its gay characters, definitely would have been called SJW pandering if the term had existed. |
Jan 31, 2018 3:47 PM
#90
LOL cry more please. i swear to god people like you are more annoying than SJWs. |
Jan 31, 2018 3:48 PM
#91
Monad said: Hmm...the fact that you find any issue with an anti-sjw expression having a pic of a female protagonist just shows your and possibly general ignorance of what sjw and what anti-sjw people are or stand for. The fact that you responded in such a way shows that you couldn't tell I was in fact snarking at you. With reasoning that anti-SJWs have actually rather commonly used -- criticizing things for having female protagonists by alleging that said protagonists were shoehorned in on the basis of their gender. Since it wasn't clear the first time, I should mention unambiguously that such reasoning is a load of crap. |
Avatar character is Gabriel from Gabriel DropOut. |
Jan 31, 2018 4:26 PM
#92
Killaclown said: sure you can, but when people are doing it so often and with no subtlety whatsover it kind of becomes a joke where you can just imagine them ticking off boxes, or there talking with their friends "ooh make him handicapped too......wait did i say him?" both "oooooooh", just like its ridiculous when they do that with other things like powers or something, at a certain point it becomes humerous and is far from limited to only being made fun of when sjws do it. And yes they can and have done that with characters, never all at the same time (to this extent) though, and why, when and how they do it are important things that everyone who uses that argument clearly overlooks, though ive already explained how the way they went about it was TERRIBLE (as the sales agree) nah nah nah dont try and twist my words cathy newman hiring the best for the job should obviously be the main requirement, and when you change all these characters races and sexuality and even try to see how many points that you can fit into one character you are going to have problems when trying to match it with the writers.... also i would imagine it would put a lot of people out of the job, but hey whats wrong with hiring and firing people based on their race/sex/sexual orientation right? well its been awhile so i cant give that many examples but for the record i really tried with these 2, left somewhere in the 2nd season of both, at a certain point it just started to feel like a chore. For supergirl i remember in the first episode the boss character was being interviewed and of course the interview her calls her the most powerful woman in the city, which she then corrects to person in the city, which of course i would do to but the writers put that in there for obvious reasons that are so apparent considering how its done and how often. their were a lot with a lesbian character that came out but i can only remember a recent one since it was from the crossover where she has a one night stand with the lesbian from legends of tomorrow and then tells her sister that she feels like such a guy "gross". one of the worst offences has to be supergirls boyfriend who was like a walking example of "toxic masculinity", he even was called "the frat boy of the universe" lol. I wont get into any of the details of legends, ill just say due to the time travel aspect there was soooo much talk about sexism and racism it really felt like class instead of a superhero show... also constant reminders that one of the members was lesbian (and they killed off my fav. character!!!! not related lol) you were the one that didnt believe that it happened at all just because it didnt happen to you, sounds like the same thing.... hey if i cant complain about people ruining my geeky hobbies then i ask you WTF is the internet for? (besides porn of course) :p If people wanna make their characters diverse, then, honestly, let them. I really don't see the huge issue. It certainly makes them more interesting, and if there's someone out there that sees the character and is like 'hey this is just like me!' and gets a smile out of it, then all the better. The only bad thing would be if someone, in trying to be inclusive, ended up just making their characters racist caricatures or offensive instead. Alright but what if these people were the best for the job for what they wanted? Also, again, most of these heroes are legacy characters so it's not like it's the exact same people in the hero role. Different people. man I don't want to offend you but I can't process or comprehend anything that you wrote in this paragraph about the shows outside of the supergirl's boyfriend part, and now I really wish I'd watched the shows so I could give a better reply and analysis of this. It's more that I was interested in what exactly some people deem to be SJW antics. Because depending on the person it can range from something like there being a black main character in a piece of media to a character mentioning their sexual orientation during a conversation. Remember, you can complain, but that's not gonna stop people from complaining about your complaining! |
Jan 31, 2018 4:33 PM
#93
cageofroses said: Some fans are pretty strongly attached to a particular vision of the work.If people wanna make their characters diverse, then, honestly, let them. I really don't see the huge issue. It certainly makes them more interesting, and if there's someone out there that sees the character and is like 'hey this is just like me!' and gets a smile out of it, then all the better. The only bad thing would be if someone, in trying to be inclusive, ended up just making their characters racist caricatures or offensive instead. I know that feel. Just that I tend to be in the minority with my opinions on stuff like anime so I guess I'm used to having to acknowledge the fact that my tastes aren't the only tastes in the world. Still, I can't deny that it's gratifying to rant on the internet about it. cageofroses said: it's complaints all the way down~Remember, you can complain, but that's not gonna stop people from complaining about your complaining! |
Avatar character is Gabriel from Gabriel DropOut. |
Jan 31, 2018 4:41 PM
#94
cageofroses said: Monad said: See the above. You are no advocate for any good for women or humanity in general if you are an sjw. Sjw are self-indulging in a pretense that they supposedly care about some good to make them-selfs feel important. But in reality all you are if you are an sjw is illogical, unrealistic and destructive. Nothing is funnier than an sjw claiming the big white knight for women card while turning the eyes away with women getting raped left and right by Muslim gangs because "ma diversity". Now that is truly ironic. hey.... buddy.... I don't know how to tell you this but........... I'm a woman. You do also know that you can be aware of and care about all of these things right? The mention of one does not signify the forgetting of the other. Like these are completely different topics you're throwing together. I would even comment on the Muslim thing but that was just so completely out of left field and not at all what the thread is about and deserves its own conversation. I was also more taking note of the fact that Buffy, with its inclusion of what back then would have been considered strong female characters (and lots of them), along with some of its gay characters, definitely would have been called SJW pandering if the term had existed. yes, i have released you are a female. why to you think you need to tell me? It will be called pandering only if the intention was so. There is no issue with the character being anything if that indention is not so. Also it will be nice if you pondered why the term exist now and not before. Because then we go into the question on "who started it". Who brought this division and hatred? Who called others names first and started criticizing what they were watching and what they liked and made fashionable the outrage culture? Cause it sure as hell wasn't any of the people you accuse of using terms you dislike. GlennMagusHarvey said: Monad said: GlennMagusHarvey said: SJW detected. Posting a show with a female protagonist. Hmm...the fact that you find any issue with an anti-sjw expression having a pic of a female protagonist just shows your and possibly general ignorance of what sjw and what anti-sjw people are or stand for. The fact that you responded in such a way shows that you couldn't tell I was in fact snarking at you. With reasoning that anti-SJWs have actually rather commonly used -- criticizing things for having female protagonists by alleging that said protagonists were shoehorned in on the basis of their gender. Since it wasn't clear the first time, I should mention unambiguously that such reasoning is a load of crap. Which as i said before shows your unfounded ignorance. Both on you idea of anti-sjw people view of things and because my answer was clearly an answer to your snarking attempt and yet you failed to detect even that much and actually thought i didn't see it. And also it is beyond ironic to try to bring on other faults you have in much bigger dosage. Because if anti-Sjw can object to a role they found as pandering in some occasions then sjw do it about everything ALL THE TIME and for millions of reasons. Is like the biggest fat guy ever trying make fun of a guy that put a few pounds during the holidays about being overweight. Stop it, is just ridiculous. You don't criticize the ones that finds fault at everything and criticize the ones that try to stop them from finding faults and trying to change everything? I mean the reason itself that the second group ended forced to criticize some things is because the first group criticizes and wants to change everything to their liking. Trying to criticize the backslash instead of the initiator is not the correct order of doing things. |
Jan 31, 2018 4:49 PM
#95
GlennMagusHarvey said: Some fans are pretty strongly attached to a particular vision of the work. I know that feel. Just that I tend to be in the minority with my opinions on stuff like anime so I guess I'm used to having to acknowledge the fact that my tastes aren't the only tastes in the world. Still, I can't deny that it's gratifying to rant on the internet about it. Oh yeah, I def get it if it's something you've always been used to and got attached to it, but letting other people experiment with franchise can lead to some good things as well! Hell, comics is such a... interesting subject for people to complain about character-wise since dc and marvel have so many different universes and legacy characters that a well-known character could be represented by literally anyone. Which I feel really opens up the creativity flow. GlennMagusHarvey said: it's complaints all the way down~ Haha, no kidding |
Jan 31, 2018 4:53 PM
#96
cageofroses said: the issue is that they didnt just make characters, they sidelined everyones favorites to push their agenda, these are freaking geeky fans we are talking about here, you dont fuck with their shit, as an anime fan i would have assumed you would know this. "it certainly makes them more interesting" that is the exact opposite of what happened, they didnt become a racist caricature they became a walking propaganda symbol that was only skin deep, their identity was so tied up in pushing the ideology that they forgot to create an actual character it seems.If people wanna make their characters diverse, then, honestly, let them. I really don't see the huge issue. It certainly makes them more interesting, and if there's someone out there that sees the character and is like 'hey this is just like me!' and gets a smile out of it, then all the better. The only bad thing would be if someone, in trying to be inclusive, ended up just making their characters racist caricatures or offensive instead. Alright but what if these people were the best for the job for what they wanted? Also, again, most of these heroes are legacy characters so it's not like it's the exact same people in the hero role. Different people. man I don't want to offend you but I can't process or comprehend anything that you wrote in this paragraph about the shows outside of the supergirl's boyfriend part, and now I really wish I'd watched the shows so I could give a better reply and analysis of this. It's more that I was interested in what exactly some people deem to be SJW antics. Because depending on the person it can range from something like there being a black main character in a piece of media to a character mentioning their sexual orientation during a conversation. Remember, you can complain, but that's not gonna stop people from complaining about your complaining! that sounds statistically VERY unlikely, and again the work speaks for itself, they weren't. yes they are legacy heroes but you still are ignoring the how, why, and when of changing them.... these are important parts, it doesn't get washed away just because they CAN change them, when did i say they cant? doesnt matter, you wouldnt agree anyways, you would simply say they have the right and ignore how constantly being preachy doesn't make for good television, i swear its like people have forgotten the importance of subtlety in entertainment. not like you even mentioned anything about the BF anyways, its annoying how often women empowerment seems to include attacking men and male traits (and of course she had to "fix him") that wasnt a good RANGE example lol, you didnt even add anything that would make you think "ok you may have a point there" well i wont apologize for complaining, especially when its warranted.... hopefully others will learn from Marvels mistake, i know they did (though they will just try and be better at it unfortunately), they almost didnt learn anything, one of the important people straight up said that the fans dont want diversity (due to the low sales), obviously apologized for that one lol. |
Jan 31, 2018 5:25 PM
#97
Monad said: You don't criticize the ones that finds fault at everything and criticize the ones that try to stop them from finding faults and trying to change everything? I mean the reason itself that the second group ended forced to criticize some things is because the first group criticizes and wants to change everything to their liking. Trying to criticize the backslash instead of the initiator is not the correct order of doing things. It is when I see far more complaining about "SJWs" than "SJWs" themselves -- far more complaining about people who advocate shoehorned demographic representation than people actually advocating shoehorned demographic respresentation, far more complaining about people who want to remove sexual fanservice from anime than people who actually want to remove sexual fanservice from anime, and so on. |
Avatar character is Gabriel from Gabriel DropOut. |
Jan 31, 2018 5:31 PM
#98
You should read the comments of Citrus episode 1 on Crunchyroll lol |
“I love heroes, but I don't want to be one. Do you even know what a hero is!? For example, you have some meat. Pirates will feast on the meat, but the hero will distribute it among the people! I want to eat the meat!” - Monkey D. Luffy |
Jan 31, 2018 5:34 PM
#99
Oh they already have. You should meet my cousin. She loves anime but name any popular show and she'll go on a 10+ minute rant on how sexist and bullshit it is |
Jan 31, 2018 6:26 PM
#100
Monad said: yes, i have released you are a female. why to you think you need to tell me? It will be called pandering only if the intention was so. There is no issue with the character being anything if that indention is not so. Also it will be nice if you pondered why the term exist now and not before. Because then we go into the question on "who started it". Who brought this division and hatred? Who called others names first and started criticizing what they were watching and what they liked and made fashionable the outrage culture? Cause it sure as hell wasn't any of the people you accuse of using terms you dislike. Thought I'd feel the need to remind you since you're complaining about the 'big white knight for women' card when... I'm a woman lol And news flash, everything is pandering to something. Doesn't make something bad. Buffy itself was made because Whedon wanted to make a movie/show about an empowering woman, and the show had its own metaphors and opinions on men. The term exists because others wanted something dumb to call people they didn't agree with. Like just try calling someone a Social Justice Warrior in public and see the weird looks you'll get. And I dunno, I've seen people throw around racial slurs to black actors when they become main characters of a franchise that didn't have main black characters before. I also didn't know being critical of media you consume was a bad thing but man you sure are teaching me a lot. |
More topics from this board
» Favorite openings of 2024 so far?Fukoku - 3 hours ago |
5 |
by kusairo
»»
9 seconds ago |
|
» Best anime of 2024 so far?Fukoku - 3 hours ago |
19 |
by deg
»»
28 seconds ago |
|
» Saddest Anime Character DeathsHenrique-Senpai - 4 hours ago |
9 |
by Zarutaku
»»
57 seconds ago |
|
» Favorite wordJoeChip - Yesterday |
18 |
by ArpitPatel
»»
4 minutes ago |
|
» What cartoon did you come to learn was actually animeJaniSIr - 8 hours ago |
15 |
by Spunkert
»»
14 minutes ago |