Report Killaclown's Profile

Drunk posting is the only way to post on MAL.

Just don't get banned like me for making "threads that don't promote discussion" >_>

A I have an interview coming up for the interview club on this site. Feel free to submit some questions about me.
https://myanimelist.net/clubs.php?cid=66976

How you been these day btw?

No, just metioning the cast positively doesn't mean they are giving it a higher score based on that. If you don't care then just end the conversation then because I'm not just going to just believe everything you say.

Since according to you having a diverse or all black cast means getting a better score.

Simply mentioning something does mean it affects score. The race of a movie cast has never been a point of evaluation for movies like soundtrack, acting, cinematography etc. You are the one who is obsessed with race of the cast. Iron Fist is nowhere near Black Panther on imdb. Just because a couple of the reviews mentioned the guy being white negatively does not mean it was judged for that and solely has a low score because of that.

Does this review say that it's bad because the guy is white?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/comic-riffs/wp/2017/03/14/iron-fist-packs-a-punch-that-occasionally-misses/?utm_term=.e893818f7986

This reviewer just says the premise is cliched and breaks down the critiquing into action, characters, performances, style, writing. Like there is no section where she has race for critiquing.

https://tv.avclub.com/iron-fist-s-premiere-doesn-t-make-a-convincing-case-for-1798190883

This reviewer mainly says that the opening scene was meh, talks about the female characters and how it's inessential to the Netflix MCU. Nowhere did she say the show is bad because the mc is white.

http://www.indiewire.com/2017/03/marvels-iron-fist-review-season-1-skippable


This review mentions the mc being white but for the purpose of saying the premise is cliched because a rich white guy learning martial arts also happens in Batman Begins and Arrow. Most of what is talked about are the characters being bland and having no development and the fights not being good.

https://www.villagevoice.com/2017/03/14/light-on-chi-the-tragedy-of-marvels-iron-fist/


This review mentions nothing about the mc's race

https://www.rollingstone.com/tv/news/rob-sheffield-iron-fist-kicks-superhero-tv-in-the-head-w471575


This review also mentions how it's similar to batman begins and the reivewer talks about the pacing being slow and that it's just not that interested. Nowhere am I seeing the reviewer here mention the mc being white is bad.

http://ew.com/tv/2017/03/10/iron-fist-ew-review/


This review talks about how it's stale, unoriginal and needs a revamp. No talk about how the show is bad because the mc is white.

http://www.vulture.com/2017/03/marvels-iron-fist-proves-superheroes-must-change-or-die.html


This review breaks down into street level authenticity, subtext, worthy adversary and not race of protagonist.

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/marvels-iron-fist-review-984200

So yeah I don't believe you that reviewers don't like it just because the guy is white.

Proof would be like a critic saying that movies should be judged by the diversity of their cast or saying a diverse cast makes a movie better. If you can't provide proof then what your saying is speculation and not concrete proof and you can't expect me to believe you.

If it was one part then as I said Straight Outta Compton would have a higher score than Dunkirk because it has that one aspect over it of having a black cast. No I don't believe mentioning it has a black cast has anything to do with the score.

Nope, there were other reasons that were given for criticism. So why did you bring up Black Panther and Iron Fist as a point of comparison and mentioned sjws? Even on imdb Black Panther is rated higher that Iron Fist. It has nothing to do with race or sjws.

The burden of proof is on you since you are the one making such a statement. If the race of the cast in relevant then as I said Straight Outta Compton would have a higher score than Dunkirk.

He is okay I guess but kind of overrated.

Yeah but it's still meh compared to the scores of other MCU Netflix shows like Daredevil, Jessica Jones etc on imdb. Point is most people just didn't like Iron Fist, sjws have nothing to do with it.

Black Panther got good reviews because most people like it while Iron Fist got bad reviews because most people didn't like it. It's as simple as that.

If you have no proof then what you are saying is not true and you just believe that.

Yeah MCU movies make more than DCEU but that doesn't automatically make them better and reviews can be paid for.

Loki wasn't a good villain in Avengers 1, he just wanted to get Hulk angry to fight the other Avengers which is a pretty meh plan.

Point is that Iron Fist got bad reviews from both critics on rotten tomatoes and user reviews on imdb and the users I was referring to were the critics on Rotten Tomatoes. In the reviews they are not just saying it's bad because the guy is white they are giving other reasons as well.

I'm not using any strawman. No you have no proof of that.

No it wasn't. Avengers 1 just reused a villain (Loki) while Justice League had a brand new villain with Steppen Wolf. There was too much emphasis on getting the Avengers to fight each other and there was no main threat but just fodder aliens to stop from invading. Live action Marvel is not automatically better than live action DC, they just make more money.

I already said there were sjws that complained about him being white but there are a lot of reviews that don't mention that and talk about how the writing and stuff suck. Iron Fist got bad reviews because it sucked for different reasons not just because of sjws. I haven't seen it myself though.

Well just say black cast then. As I said black cast wasn't the only thing mentioned and I have already proven you wrong. If black cast means getting a better score then Straight Outta Compton would have a higher score than Dunkirk.

You thinking it's meh doesn't make it a bad movie. The only real problem with it was that Steppen Wolf needed more depth as a villain. Justice League is the most comparable to the first Avengers movie since both are team up superhero movies yet Avengers 1 which had an all white cast has a higher score than the Justice League movie. Both are good superhero movies but Justice League had a more diverse cast yet has a lower score.

As I said they didn't only mention black cast. Black Panther got good reviews because it is a good movie period. Iron Fist got bad reviews because of different reasons not just because sjws didn't like the mc because he is white and doing martial arts.

Which is not diversity since it's an all black cast not a diverse cast with different races and black cast wasn't the only thing they said was good about it.

It was a good movie. Did you even see it? I would think it would have a better score because according to you a good movie will get a higher score just for being diverse.

Rotten Tomatoes only uses scores from critics to get the final score so movies like Barbershop and Straight Outta Compton should have higher scores for having black casts than Dunkirk but they don't. So your logic is flawed as I told you. Iron Fist has a lot of bad reviews on imdb and those reviews are user reviews.

Funny how you are not talking about how on the first page of reviews for Black Panther on imdb are low scores

Where is diverse mentioned there? Most of the reviews there I'm seeing don't mention anything about diversity.

Justice League was a good movie with good characters, action and humor. That is a lie there is nothing proving that. As I said if that was true Justice League would have a better score than Dunkirk.

Show me where they say diverse cast for three of them because I only saw one review mention diverse. Even if it is 3 reviews that is no where close to a majority of reviewers saying that.

I know what you said already and it's made up bullshit because if it was a fact as I said a good movie like Justice League would have a better score simply for having a diverse cast. You are just making shit up without giving any concrete proof.

I told you that I did read the reviews about Black Panther on Rotten Tomatoes and there was only one that said anything about diverse.Black Panther is the movie you mentioned. I brought up those other movies because you are making a generalized claim that movies get better scores for having a diverse cast. Your logic is not adding up because then Justice League which was a good movie should have a higher score than Dunkirk since it had a more diverse cast. I did acknowledge that there were sjws who didn't like Iron Fist because the guy is white however people had other problems with it.

LOOK AT THE REVIEWS HERE ON IMDB.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3322310/reviews?ref_=tt_urv

I'm not seeing reviews here saying the show is bad just because the guy is white and doing martial arts. People are also criticizing it for the dialogue, writing etc. not being good.

It wasn't just women but had a fat woman and a black woman so that would be considered diverse. What others? As I told you I only saw one review on rotten tomatoes that mentioned diverse.

Yes I'm going by your logic. So if you are saying movies with a black cast will automatically be seen as diverse and get high ratings then why do most Tyler Perry movies have low scores?

The newest Fantastic 4 movie that came out some years ago had Micheal B Jordan who is black playing Johnny Storm who is white yet it has an abysmal score of 4.3 on imdb. How come sjws didn't score it high for adding a black guy to make it diverse? Why is Dunkirk rated way higher than Justice League even though it didn't have diversity of including minorities?

I'm looking through the reviews on rotten tomatoes and only one I found that mentions diverse cast. I'm using your logic , diverse cast means better score yet that isn't the case for Ghostbusters 2016.

Cell is my profile pic.