Look, in an ideal world, I preferably don't want to give any of the anime I watch lower than a 7. 7 and up means a definite endorsement and then from there to 10 it's all just a matter of degrees. 6 is where I begin having problems that hinder my enjoyment of the show, but still definitely a worthwhile watch. 5 is the same, but I suppose even more pronounced (Have to admit to having not thought about this distinction much between 5 and 6 until now. 6 I figure is where I still liked more about it than disliked but it's seriously flawed in a way that makes it way more dull or frustrating than it needs to be. 5 is the same, but without feeling more positive than negative. It's a complete break-even wash). 4 and lower is where I definitely disliked more about it than I liked.
Also, I can love the premise of something but have serious grievances with its execution. Looking at something like Goblin Slayer, I originally rated it a 6, but then changed it to 7. I adore the premise of what's basically D&D the anime (not even a tabletop RPG player, but I find it a fun concept for a show), I love seeing goblins from European inspired folklore in a show, I love the medieval setting with guilds and such, I love a decent high fantasy. Problems? The OST was mainly bland and generic, I didn't like its usage of CGI such as on the protagonist's armor, and the fanservice shots were so blatant, cringe-worthy, and juvenile, so it felt dumbed down. That is how something can dance the 6-7 range. Something which could be a 9 or 10 if executed artfully feels a bit lobotomized of premium content and ends up feeling much more shallow.
A 6, for example, is what I gave to Eva, which might earn me some ire. Amazing premise, nice animation, very unique worldbuilding and feel to the show, great mech and creature designs, decent drama, but absolutely hated most of the characters and the style over substance religious imagery superimposed on the show. In my estimation that was enough to downgrade its score. It's obviously a finer made quality product than something like GS for its intricate writing and influence on the medium for two decades, but I erred on the side of placing primacy on personal enjoyment level.
I have given out only a small handful (less than five, I believe) 4s and 3s. I haven't handed out any 1s or 2s.
Yes, if I've started watching any show then it can at least be said I'm interested enough by the premise as I'll read the synopsis and read or watch some non-spoilery reviews/overviews before watching. That's why it's rare for a show or film to earn less than a 5 from me (just on here going based on MAL's scoring range).
Maybe there is some difference in the way we're perceiving these ratings? I don't at all perceive a 6 or even a 5 as an outright poor rating. It's in the middle of the numerical scale, meaning it is average. 6 on the positive side of average and 5 smack at the dead center. Why are these being perceived as horrendous ratings? With a 6 there was still more I liked about it than disliked and I'm definitely glad I watched it, but it may have terrible animation, terrible OST, aggravating characters, or an inconclusive/wishy-washy or cliffhanger ending that really harms it.
I don't really ever regret watching anything - Even the 4s and 3s, and even the theoretical 2s and 1s if I ever give them out, because for everything made, there must be at least one person on Earth who likes it and something of inherent value present even if I loathe the experience of watching it. I'd rather have seen it and criticize than remain ignorant.
Only show I dropped to date is the second season of SnK, because I have thousands of titles out there to watch and it makes me angry and I find it tedious to have to sit through something presented in a style to so blatantly compete for ratings with baiting cliffhangers every second. |