InsaneLeader13 said:Buo said:I'm a rather simple person, I expect drama to be poignant, comedy to be funny, action to be fun and horror to be creepy. It's only after I'm satisfied on an emotional level that I'm willing to dig further and read the subtext.
Some people are able to get past that and directly enjoy shows thanks to their subtext.
That actually frustrates me because I feel as though I've been missing out on great things because of this. Shows like Ergo Proxy for example, I couldn't get invested in the story or the characters at all, and because of this I'm pretty sure I missed something brilliant.
Is it my own fault for not being able to grab the subtext directly and having to rely on emotions to be willing to do so? Or is it the show's fault for not being able to grab me with its story and/or characters?
YES! I'm not the only one!
Case in point for this would be both Panty and Stocking, and FLCL. I disliked the first and hated the second. The humor was quite flat and relied too much on 'crazy shit in your face' and south-park style humor for both of them, what little drama there was going on bored me to death, and I never found anything really fun or enjoyable with either.
And to this day, I wonder if this makes me worse as a person. I try to review things with only a slight bias to enjoyment, and yet I know that because I couldn't enjoy either of these, I lost anything that was 'deep' inside of them which thousands of others have picked up on.
My end thoughts are this:
"Well, if the story couldn't grab me, then maybe I'm not the type of audience that this show was aimed at."
Because when you realize that creators aren't always trying to market one thing to everyone, but are typically trying to market certain things to certain groups, the world sorta sorts itself out...or at least...the world of anime sorts itself out better for oneself.
lol, you're not a worse person. Idk about P&S but FLCL is up to interpretation to some extent and some shows like Cat Soup rely on it very heavily. People use the word deep in places it might not necessarily apply. Maybe somebody found it "deep" because it was relatable, like Ping Pong for me, or because it presents ideas in a unique way like SEL, and there's the interpretation with the aforementioned Cat Soup, and in the case of FLCL, it's a combination of all those things, but none of those things are the same as being deep or even good, so your opinion isn't wrong.