New
Mar 19, 11:46 AM
#51
Reply to jacobPOL
that discussion is pointless, imagine battling over animated cartoons and who has better taste, we do not live in 2000s anymore, get over with it, "anime" is animation from japan it's a medium and not "genre", animation is for everyone with plephora of genre's and demographics to choose from and enjoy and have fun.
@jacobPOL How dare you post sonething reasonable and true on AD. |
Mar 19, 11:58 AM
#52
Mar 19, 12:00 PM
#53
Reply to jacobPOL
@JoeChip because whenever I see these type of discussions it's just so annoying when people delusionaly fighting over nothing and are fighting between each other instead having fun.
@jacobPOL Well "fighting over nothing and are fighting between each other" is their understanding of fun. |
Mar 19, 12:03 PM
#54
Mar 19, 12:05 PM
#55
Reply to Nirinbo
Well, it's been a few years since the last time someone with Monster, Cowboy Bebop, Madoka Magica, End of Eva and Tenshi no Tamago in his favorites told me that my 10s are trash even if no one asked.
I guess elitists are slowly disappearing; it makes sense, since new anime fans keep replacing old ones.
I guess elitists are slowly disappearing; it makes sense, since new anime fans keep replacing old ones.
@Nirinbo OK, but why aren't new fans becoming elitists? |
Mar 19, 12:24 PM
#56
Reply to perseii
@joemaamah You are the Eternal One, the Fount of Knowledge, the Living Testament. And also a super-elitist, apparently.
I did just call Attack on Titan fans "old-timers," though, so take that how you will ;)
I did just call Attack on Titan fans "old-timers," though, so take that how you will ;)
@perseii Now THAT'S what really scares me!!! |
Mar 19, 12:55 PM
#57
Reply to thewiru
@Nirinbo
OK, but why aren't new fans becoming elitists?
OK, but why aren't new fans becoming elitists?
@thewiru because we're getting farther and farther away from the age in which "elitist starter pack" anime thrived, the late 90s-early 2000s. If you start watching anime in the 2020s you'll most likely start with whatever is popular right now; most people will drop this hobby after a few years and they might never know they would have loved those elitist anime because they never had the chance to watch them. With that said, new anime fans can still be just as arrogant. The difference is that a few years ago the guy who insulted me for no reason had the elitist starter pack in his favorites, whereas more recently the same insults came from a fan of AoT, Demon Slayer and Solo Leveling. |
Mar 19, 1:22 PM
#58
Mar 19, 1:22 PM
#59
Mar 19, 1:43 PM
#60
Nirinbo said: from the age in which "elitist starter pack" anime thrived, the late 90s-early 2000s. People started calling those "elitist starter pack" in the 10s tho. Back in the day those were "Decent anime you can find on bootlegged VHS/DVD or download via IRC, if you want something different than those countless Pokemon-like shows on TV.". |
alshuMar 19, 1:55 PM
Mar 19, 2:04 PM
#61
Reply to Nirinbo
@thewiru because we're getting farther and farther away from the age in which "elitist starter pack" anime thrived, the late 90s-early 2000s. If you start watching anime in the 2020s you'll most likely start with whatever is popular right now; most people will drop this hobby after a few years and they might never know they would have loved those elitist anime because they never had the chance to watch them.
With that said, new anime fans can still be just as arrogant. The difference is that a few years ago the guy who insulted me for no reason had the elitist starter pack in his favorites, whereas more recently the same insults came from a fan of AoT, Demon Slayer and Solo Leveling.
With that said, new anime fans can still be just as arrogant. The difference is that a few years ago the guy who insulted me for no reason had the elitist starter pack in his favorites, whereas more recently the same insults came from a fan of AoT, Demon Slayer and Solo Leveling.
@Nirinbo Nirinbo said: because we're getting farther and farther away from the age in which "elitist starter pack" anime thrived, the late 90s-early 2000s. So what, lmao? Can't that person just be elitist over other anime? I made a thread several months ago how there's a lot of elitist anime that came in the 2010's. |
Mar 19, 2:10 PM
#62
Reply to thewiru
@Nirinbo
OK, but why aren't new fans becoming elitists?
OK, but why aren't new fans becoming elitists?
@thewiru well there aren't many POPULAR new titles which will attract them There are still good shows but do you really think most new fans will come to anime because of dead dead demon's? (Well I try but still) And from them how many have a superiority complex? There are people who think they are better than everyone else but not many will be attracted to anime |
Mar 19, 2:14 PM
#63
Reply to removed-user
@Supersonic_Pain Solo Leveling is bad because it is primarily liked by Indians who as a country decided that Johnny Bravo was someone that was meant to be emulated, ergo while they operate in the english speaking sphere their considerations should be taken with a grain of salt. Power fantasies appeal the most to those who live in poor conditions as another example.
Dienen said: ...Boy that's uh, not exactly the reason I expected you'd say...Solo Leveling is bad because it is primarily liked by Indians |
Mar 19, 2:16 PM
#64
Reply to Guilmon1
@thewiru well there aren't many POPULAR new titles which will attract them
There are still good shows but do you really think most new fans will come to anime because of dead dead demon's? (Well I try but still) And from them how many have a superiority complex? There are people who think they are better than everyone else but not many will be attracted to anime
There are still good shows but do you really think most new fans will come to anime because of dead dead demon's? (Well I try but still) And from them how many have a superiority complex? There are people who think they are better than everyone else but not many will be attracted to anime
Guilmon1 said: well there aren't many POPULAR new titles which will attract them Wasn't the whole point of being an elitist that you're watching UNPOPULAR stuff? Do you really think the "Elitist 3x3" was composed of that person's first anime? |
Mar 19, 2:18 PM
#65
Reply to alshu
Nirinbo said:
from the age in which "elitist starter pack" anime thrived, the late 90s-early 2000s.
from the age in which "elitist starter pack" anime thrived, the late 90s-early 2000s.
People started calling those "elitist starter pack" in the 10s tho.
Back in the day those were "Decent anime you can find on bootlegged VHS/DVD or download via IRC, if you want something different than those countless Pokemon-like shows on TV.".
@alshu yeah, I imagine it took a while for those anime to be considered classics and availability was an issue when home internet wasn't popular. Still, I'd say that an anime fan in 2010 was more likely to end up watching some of the late 90s-early 2000s anime that are now considered "elitist" than an anime fan in 2025, even if just because there's more competition now. For example, in terms of popularity on MAL, SEL went from #84 in 2010 to #242 in 2025 even if it gained almost 30x more members. |
Mar 19, 2:27 PM
#66
Reply to thewiru
@Nirinbo
So what, lmao?
Can't that person just be elitist over other anime? I made a thread several months ago how there's a lot of elitist anime that came in the 2010's.
Nirinbo said:
because we're getting farther and farther away from the age in which "elitist starter pack" anime thrived, the late 90s-early 2000s.
because we're getting farther and farther away from the age in which "elitist starter pack" anime thrived, the late 90s-early 2000s.
So what, lmao?
Can't that person just be elitist over other anime? I made a thread several months ago how there's a lot of elitist anime that came in the 2010's.
@thewiru you said 2010s, but there aren't as many elitist anime in the 2020s. Sonny Boy and the Tatami Galaxy sequel are definitely there, but then? There might be a few more candidates but I feel it's too early to tell right now. |
Mar 19, 2:27 PM
#67
Most of them left the medium, I think. |
Mar 19, 2:57 PM
#68
Nirinbo said: For example, in terms of popularity on MAL, SEL went from #84 in 2010 to #242 in 2025 even if it gained almost 30x more members. Natural score decay? Also not sure how that tells us something about anime elitists in general, since "elitist starter pack" was sort of a meme and way to mock the retro fans. On the other hand - yes, I think nowadays there are less retro anime fans in comparison to the total number of anime fans. Plus the limited availability is not the only factor to blame. And a bit off tropic - never watched SEL, never felt it's for me. Also from the stuff I know about it, I am not sure how it is/was considered a classic. Was it influential? Was is an unprecedented achievement, a high water mark? I suspect nostalgia. |
Mar 19, 3:18 PM
#69
Reply to alshu
Nirinbo said:
For example, in terms of popularity on MAL, SEL went from #84 in 2010 to #242 in 2025 even if it gained almost 30x more members.
For example, in terms of popularity on MAL, SEL went from #84 in 2010 to #242 in 2025 even if it gained almost 30x more members.
Natural score decay?
Also not sure how that tells us something about anime elitists in general, since "elitist starter pack" was sort of a meme and way to mock the retro fans.
On the other hand - yes, I think nowadays there are less retro anime fans in comparison to the total number of anime fans. Plus the limited availability is not the only factor to blame.
And a bit off tropic - never watched SEL, never felt it's for me. Also from the stuff I know about it, I am not sure how it is/was considered a classic. Was it influential? Was is an unprecedented achievement, a high water mark?
I suspect nostalgia.
alshu said: Natural score decay? They were talking about popularity, though, not score. alshu said: And a bit off tropic - never watched SEL, never felt it's for me. Also from the stuff I know about it, I am not sure how it is/was considered a classic. Was it influential? Was is an unprecedented achievement, a high water mark? I suspect nostalgia. |
Mar 19, 3:35 PM
#70
thewiru said: They were talking about popularity, though, not score. Same difference. And the video...not the biggest fan of Digi's opinions (like, at one point it was fun to listen to their ramblings, but not any more), so I am not watching it. |
Mar 19, 4:22 PM
#71
Reply to alshu
Nirinbo said:
For example, in terms of popularity on MAL, SEL went from #84 in 2010 to #242 in 2025 even if it gained almost 30x more members.
For example, in terms of popularity on MAL, SEL went from #84 in 2010 to #242 in 2025 even if it gained almost 30x more members.
Natural score decay?
Also not sure how that tells us something about anime elitists in general, since "elitist starter pack" was sort of a meme and way to mock the retro fans.
On the other hand - yes, I think nowadays there are less retro anime fans in comparison to the total number of anime fans. Plus the limited availability is not the only factor to blame.
And a bit off tropic - never watched SEL, never felt it's for me. Also from the stuff I know about it, I am not sure how it is/was considered a classic. Was it influential? Was is an unprecedented achievement, a high water mark?
I suspect nostalgia.
@alshu I was talking about popularity, the score of SEL actually increased over time which is incredibly rare. Personally I'm not a fan of SEL. Its style is exactly the opposite of what I enjoy, but I admit there's no other anime that did the same things it did but better. |
Mar 19, 4:54 PM
#72
we are still around, we just have jobs and less time to talk |
Sonic X is basically an isekai |
Mar 19, 6:50 PM
#73
Reply to Wyatt
@BilboBaggins365 Obviously attacking people's intelligence is ridiculous and wrong. Obviously anyone thinking Legend of the Galactic Heroes is a replacement for reading history books is wrong. Obviously listening to people who are pretentious or think they're smart is annoying. But knowledge is only one half of being a critic. The other half is the choice to be a critic by trade. I don't expect everyone or most people to be critics. That's exactly what I'm saying. To be a proper critic, one must have knowledge and devotion, and that devotion includes discernment and curiosity.
@Wyatt Yeah but you didn't say critic, you said elitist. Those are not the same things. Like sure, I would like to see more fans in the fandom that watch more than seasonal anime, or have more varied genre interests and don't crown every seasonal as the best thing since slice cheese. It's interesting to listen to someone who is better analyzing media than me. That doesn't make them elitists. Elitist behaviour is about being snobbish. Guilmon1 said: from what I've seen (sadly not enough) the relationship between LoGH and politics is the same as most sci-fi and science, it uses some ideas from it to help the themes, not to teach about the topic but it might interest people and lead them to learn about it SPTLayzner said: Nothing wrong with that however, again when I am watching LOTGH I know I am watching it for entertainment, not education. Like LOTGH throws in Gibbon's widely criticized thesis for the Fall of the Roman Empire, that the Catholic Church caused its fall. Most historians now would argue Gibbon was just biased, due to his political leanings, and the general nature of the time he wrote it, and that you can ascribe way more significant reasons to other places. @Guilmon1 True it make you interest in the topic itself and you will seek them out by yourself when you ready to learn more. Like it doesn't really matter at the end of the day, however, TBH if you want an anime like Legend of the Galactic Heroes, and you watch an anime like Dragon Ball, they basically are the same in terms of "educational" value. I mean DB could get you interested to learn more about Chinese culture and Journey to the West as well. There just are a lot of LOTGH fans, that do think they are smarter of watching said show. I like the series, however, the fandom is very very hit or miss, in the kind of fan you are going to get. JoeChip said: Dude all you do is make random snipes at people, and then cower away, without providing any actual discussion. You contribute to AD being bad at times lol. How dare you post sonething reasonable and true on AD. |
Mar 19, 7:58 PM
#74
Reply to JoeChip
Not this "elitist anime fans" argument again... And we already have an elitist thread just a few days ago https://myanimelist.net/forum/?topicid=2205522
People need to learn use search.
People need to learn use search.
@JoeChip I posted in this thread. My thread was inspired by that one, but is not the same subject |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Mar 19, 8:02 PM
#75
Reply to thewiru
@Nirinbo
So what, lmao?
Can't that person just be elitist over other anime? I made a thread several months ago how there's a lot of elitist anime that came in the 2010's.
Nirinbo said:
because we're getting farther and farther away from the age in which "elitist starter pack" anime thrived, the late 90s-early 2000s.
because we're getting farther and farther away from the age in which "elitist starter pack" anime thrived, the late 90s-early 2000s.
So what, lmao?
Can't that person just be elitist over other anime? I made a thread several months ago how there's a lot of elitist anime that came in the 2010's.
@thewiru I dunno, anime in the classical elitist fashion aren't really coming out. Last one IMO is Ping Pong. Maybe Sonny Boy? @BilboBaggins365 I miss even the snobby elitists because they were open to the idea of taking anime seriously, of it being something that could be engaged critically and something that is meaningful. But yeah you're right really what I want is critics. I don't even know where anime critics could be cultivated, or where I could find ones. Big sakuga people are honestly the closest, despite my dislike of much of their approach. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Mar 19, 8:04 PM
#76
Reply to alshu
Nirinbo said:
For example, in terms of popularity on MAL, SEL went from #84 in 2010 to #242 in 2025 even if it gained almost 30x more members.
For example, in terms of popularity on MAL, SEL went from #84 in 2010 to #242 in 2025 even if it gained almost 30x more members.
Natural score decay?
Also not sure how that tells us something about anime elitists in general, since "elitist starter pack" was sort of a meme and way to mock the retro fans.
On the other hand - yes, I think nowadays there are less retro anime fans in comparison to the total number of anime fans. Plus the limited availability is not the only factor to blame.
And a bit off tropic - never watched SEL, never felt it's for me. Also from the stuff I know about it, I am not sure how it is/was considered a classic. Was it influential? Was is an unprecedented achievement, a high water mark?
I suspect nostalgia.
@alshu There's just an increasing lack of curiosity. When I was 14 there were plenty of people my age who eagerly looked back at shows like Lain because they heard they were good, no nostalgia attached (I was 14 in 2016, years and years after Lain came out). Of course there were plenty of incurious people back then too. But it's as popular as ever to act like enjoying anything older than 2 years old is pretentious. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Mar 19, 8:07 PM
#77
Reply to Supersonic_Pain
Wyatt said:
Supersonic_Pain "If someone who mostly adores shoujo and nothing else (or, say, mecha shows from the 80s and 90s) said Dead Dead Demon's Dededede Destruction sucks, should I automatically assume they know what they're talking about because their average score on MAL is a 5.83?"
No. Not saying that. But if someone who only likes shoujo shows has well expressed criticism about some shoujo shows, and then gave one new shojou a 9, id be like, oh I should try that one.
Supersonic_Pain "If someone who mostly adores shoujo and nothing else (or, say, mecha shows from the 80s and 90s) said Dead Dead Demon's Dededede Destruction sucks, should I automatically assume they know what they're talking about because their average score on MAL is a 5.83?"
No. Not saying that. But if someone who only likes shoujo shows has well expressed criticism about some shoujo shows, and then gave one new shojou a 9, id be like, oh I should try that one.
You can be a well-read fan and even a so-called "expert" on something without being an elitist though.
I think there's a difference between being pro-intellectual and pro-elitist.
Critical thinking good, elitist attitude bad
That's not to say you can't dislike popular modern shows (God knows I've done that) but if you turn your nose up at modern anime and hold up the same list of 20+ year old "elitist" anime as peak fiction, that's something anyone can do.
You can have an elitist attitude with no critical thinking and have worthless reviews.
You shouldn't be propping up "elitists", you should be propping up people of all types who put actual thought behind their reviews
Dienen said:
Supersonic_Pain Solo Leveling is bad because it is primarily liked by Indians who as a country decided that Johnny Bravo was someone that was meant to be emulated, ergo while they operate in the english speaking sphere their considerations should be taken with a grain of salt. Power fantasies appeal the most to those who live in poor conditions as another example.
Supersonic_Pain Solo Leveling is bad because it is primarily liked by Indians who as a country decided that Johnny Bravo was someone that was meant to be emulated, ergo while they operate in the english speaking sphere their considerations should be taken with a grain of salt. Power fantasies appeal the most to those who live in poor conditions as another example.
I'm gonna keep it 100 with you, I haven't seen Solo Leveling, it was just the first modern show that "elitists" wouldn't like that came to mind
@Supersonic_Pain I agree. I'm pro intellectual not pro elitist. But elitists were open to intellectualism. And anyone trying to be a critic gets called an elitist |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Mar 19, 8:09 PM
#78
Reply to AnimePedestrian
Digibro was kind of a degenerate who was just trying to justify his degeneracy.
To OP, My taste is sortof classical elitist bs... But I don't like telling people what to watch. Cause I watch stuff like Ergo Proxy and Monster unironically to analyse the themes and characters.
To OP, My taste is sortof classical elitist bs... But I don't like telling people what to watch. Cause I watch stuff like Ergo Proxy and Monster unironically to analyse the themes and characters.
@AnimePedestrian Perhaps, but Digibro was the best ever anime YouTuber nonetheless. No one else had so much insight, knowledge and originality. Though K-On and kill la kill are trash! And no one should have that many anime girl posters. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Mar 19, 9:05 PM
#79
Reply to Wyatt
@thewiru I dunno, anime in the classical elitist fashion aren't really coming out. Last one IMO is Ping Pong. Maybe Sonny Boy?
@BilboBaggins365 I miss even the snobby elitists because they were open to the idea of taking anime seriously, of it being something that could be engaged critically and something that is meaningful. But yeah you're right really what I want is critics. I don't even know where anime critics could be cultivated, or where I could find ones. Big sakuga people are honestly the closest, despite my dislike of much of their approach.
@BilboBaggins365 I miss even the snobby elitists because they were open to the idea of taking anime seriously, of it being something that could be engaged critically and something that is meaningful. But yeah you're right really what I want is critics. I don't even know where anime critics could be cultivated, or where I could find ones. Big sakuga people are honestly the closest, despite my dislike of much of their approach.
Wyatt said: @thewiru I dunno, anime in the classical elitist fashion aren't really coming out. Last one IMO is Ping Pong. Maybe Sonny Boy? Definitely Sonny Boy. Some later ones (Released after Sonny Boy) that could (Possibly) qualify (Going for the more "stereotypical" definition, otherwise I would put some cute girls anime here): I'll admit that some of those were a bit of a stretch, though. |
Mar 19, 9:06 PM
#80
Mar 19, 9:31 PM
#81
Wyatt said: Supersonic_Pain I agree. I'm pro intellectual not pro elitist. But elitists were open to intellectualism. And anyone trying to be a critic gets called an elitist In that case, I agree I do feel, in ~society~ in general, there's a trend to be anti-intellectual for fear of being labeled a "yapper" or "it's not that deep" or something thewiru said: Definitely Sonny Boy. Some later ones (Released after Sonny Boy) that could (Possibly) qualify (Going for the more "stereotypical" definition, otherwise I would put some cute girls anime here): Chi. Chikyuu no Undou ni Tsuite Mononoke Movie: Karakasa Look Back Kimitachi wa Dou Ikiru ka Tengoku Daimakyou Cyberpunk: Edgerunners Ousama Ranking Heion Sedai no Idaten-tachi I'll admit that some of those were a bit of a stretch, though. Yeah, Orb is definitely one that I could see on these types of lists in the future They're still coming out, if you know where to look |
Mar 19, 9:53 PM
#82
Reply to thewiru
Wyatt said:
@thewiru I dunno, anime in the classical elitist fashion aren't really coming out. Last one IMO is Ping Pong. Maybe Sonny Boy?
@thewiru I dunno, anime in the classical elitist fashion aren't really coming out. Last one IMO is Ping Pong. Maybe Sonny Boy?
Definitely Sonny Boy.
Some later ones (Released after Sonny Boy) that could (Possibly) qualify (Going for the more "stereotypical" definition, otherwise I would put some cute girls anime here):
I'll admit that some of those were a bit of a stretch, though.
@thewiru I think most of them don't fit tbh. Maybe Boy and The Heron. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Mar 19, 10:22 PM
#83
Reply to Wyatt
@Geark77 I didn’t know that. Is he writing good stuff or just baiting? Is anidb less sensitive?
@Wyatt I think you should check it yourself. From my perspective, most of his recent reviews sound pretty much like rants rather than full-blown reviews, but sometimes he make some interesting points regarding modern stuff. |
Mar 19, 10:23 PM
#84
Every anime fan is an elitist to some extent as i'm an elitist when it comes to schlock anime. Even my boomer dad who rarely watches anime is a gundam elitist after he caught me watching an episode of the original series on a bootleg VHS as a kid & ever since then he's been tracking down as much gundam related stuf to watch or read as he can. I i try introducing him to something else he'll not say It was pretty good but not at as good as that gundam cartoon franchise you introduced me to 13 years ago. He notoriously whenever he tries to say anime it comes out as a A NIME (rhymes with A DIME) so he just calls it a cartoon |
Mar 20, 9:39 AM
#85
Elitist are the people who claim Monogatari series with its nauseating visuals and bullshit dialogue is peak because it's popular; then say: "Durhurrhurr it visuals is peak its not nonsense dialogue its art bruh u jus aren't smart" THAT's AN ELITIST People who claim things that are objectively crap are actually good due to you just not being capable of seeing its brilliance are elitists. |
SuperAdventureMar 20, 9:42 AM
Mar 20, 10:14 AM
#86
Reply to 17999
Dienen said:
Solo Leveling is bad because it is primarily liked by Indians
...Boy that's uh, not exactly the reason I expected you'd say...Solo Leveling is bad because it is primarily liked by Indians
@17999 Solo Leveling is not even in the top 10 of it's season in Japan. It's only watched by Indian-Korean and maybe Chinese people that were in Japan while it was airing. |
Mar 20, 10:16 AM
#87
Reply to SuperAdventure
Elitist are the people who claim Monogatari series with its nauseating visuals and bullshit dialogue is peak because it's popular;
then say: "Durhurrhurr it visuals is peak its not nonsense dialogue its art bruh u jus aren't smart" THAT's AN ELITIST
People who claim things that are objectively crap are actually good due to you just not being capable of seeing its brilliance are elitists.
then say: "Durhurrhurr it visuals is peak its not nonsense dialogue its art bruh u jus aren't smart" THAT's AN ELITIST
People who claim things that are objectively crap are actually good due to you just not being capable of seeing its brilliance are elitists.
@SuperAdventure Objectivity doesn't work like that. Monogatari is "peak" because of the character design of the girls not the direction. Monogatari has good writing and the claim that it's writing is "peak" should be allowed to be tested without cowardly jy "techniques" and misdirection. |
Mar 20, 10:22 AM
#88
Elitists? Did you mean battle shounen fans? |
Mar 20, 10:44 AM
#89
Reply to removed-user
@SuperAdventure Objectivity doesn't work like that.
Monogatari is "peak" because of the character design of the girls not the direction.
Monogatari has good writing and the claim that it's writing is "peak" should be allowed to be tested without cowardly jy "techniques" and misdirection.
Monogatari is "peak" because of the character design of the girls not the direction.
Monogatari has good writing and the claim that it's writing is "peak" should be allowed to be tested without cowardly jy "techniques" and misdirection.
@Dienen Yes objectivity does work like that and, it exists. Liking something because it's popular doesn't make it good. Claiming anything is 'peak' is already suspect that's why I mock that word. If you want to claim it has good writing- compared to what? Edit- you preach allowing a claim to be tested- that means you need to explain how a girl yammering in monotone for 25 minutes straight about nothing logical while nauseating scenes (some of them upside down) flash across the screen, with body parts laying under a tree etc- is "PEAK" compared to what you claim it's better than.... |
SuperAdventureMar 20, 10:51 AM
Mar 20, 10:47 AM
#90
SuperAdventure said: Elitist are the people who claim Monogatari series with its nauseating visuals and bullshit dialogue is peak because it's popular; then say: "Durhurrhurr it visuals is peak its not nonsense dialogue its art bruh u jus aren't smart" THAT's AN ELITIST People who claim things that are objectively crap are actually good due to you just not being capable of seeing its brilliance are elitists. Not that I'm saying you have to like Monogatari but the lack of self-awareness here is astounding You're saying that your opinion is objective and that people are only saying a show is good because it's popular Two things an elitist would do |
Mar 20, 11:08 AM
#91
Reply to Supersonic_Pain
SuperAdventure said:
Elitist are the people who claim Monogatari series with its nauseating visuals and bullshit dialogue is peak because it's popular;
then say: "Durhurrhurr it visuals is peak its not nonsense dialogue its art bruh u jus aren't smart" THAT's AN ELITIST
People who claim things that are objectively crap are actually good due to you just not being capable of seeing its brilliance are elitists.
Elitist are the people who claim Monogatari series with its nauseating visuals and bullshit dialogue is peak because it's popular;
then say: "Durhurrhurr it visuals is peak its not nonsense dialogue its art bruh u jus aren't smart" THAT's AN ELITIST
People who claim things that are objectively crap are actually good due to you just not being capable of seeing its brilliance are elitists.
Not that I'm saying you have to like Monogatari but the lack of self-awareness here is astounding
You're saying that your opinion is objective and that people are only saying a show is good because it's popular
Two things an elitist would do
Supersonic_Pain said: the lack of self-awareness here is astounding ^ Here is another thing elitists do Thanks for proving my point. Congrats. |
Mar 20, 12:03 PM
#92
I think a lot of people with this mentality (myself included) eventually become burnt out of the community. Most anime discourse is about recent stuff, most of it being slop so if you're someone who is super interested in anime as an artistic medium and what it's capable of in aesthetics and storytelling you're going to be fighting an uphill battle. Much like the artist formerly known as Digibro, most of these pundits leave the community after a while. |
Mar 20, 2:01 PM
#93
Mar 20, 4:10 PM
#94
Reply to SuperAdventure
@Dienen Yes objectivity does work like that and, it exists. Liking something because it's popular doesn't make it good.
Claiming anything is 'peak' is already suspect that's why I mock that word.
If you want to claim it has good writing- compared to what?
Edit- you preach allowing a claim to be tested- that means you need to explain how a girl yammering in monotone for 25 minutes straight about nothing logical while nauseating scenes (some of them upside down) flash across the screen, with body parts laying under a tree etc- is "PEAK"
compared to what you claim it's better than....
Claiming anything is 'peak' is already suspect that's why I mock that word.
If you want to claim it has good writing- compared to what?
Edit- you preach allowing a claim to be tested- that means you need to explain how a girl yammering in monotone for 25 minutes straight about nothing logical while nauseating scenes (some of them upside down) flash across the screen, with body parts laying under a tree etc- is "PEAK"
compared to what you claim it's better than....
@SuperAdventure you still haven't explained why it is objectively crap. And yes, popularity for non kodomo series before Indian access to the internet is a good metric for quality akshually. |
Mar 20, 4:12 PM
#95
For a long time they were wrong, and then content creation became more of a thing and sequels started happening. At that point elitists became mainstream. It's arguably harder to find a good original now, to the extent where it's a race to the bottom fighting against elitists. I can pick apart any content-anime for its cliches to the extent where I'm confused about why I even started watching an anime in the first place. I think the rough thing for me is, these aren't even classy cliches, it's more from the perspective of sales: shouneny teen-types do crazy things. Not you know, babes go into space and discover more babes, or gun dude shoots other gun dude with the fist of his bullet, or hard dude punches dude, lazers dude, fights dude for money, fights a monster for money, you know those sorts of things. It's usually western perspective content creation. *cough* Dandadan *cough* There truly aren't enough high quality originals anymore, the boat is sinking without a life preserver. Even Frieren isn't safe from criticism. What elitists were truly trying to criticize was the lack of intelligence in original story writing. They weren't wrong. And if someone does make a good genre anime the chances of it being trash are higher. |
Mar 20, 4:22 PM
#96
Reply to EmiliaHoarfrost
They pursued masters and PhDs in animation? Participated in symposiums? Wrote critically and grew up to responsibilities in the field?
@Dienen She isn't Digibro, she is Trixie the Golden Witch
@Dienen She isn't Digibro, she is Trixie the Golden Witch
EmiliaHoarfrost said: They pursued masters and PhDs in animation? Participated in symposiums? Wrote critically and grew up to responsibilities in the field? I mean, we all know that they didn't. |
Mar 20, 5:52 PM
#97
Now that's a name I have not heard in a long time. And yet it took me about a minute to find something absolutely idiotic Digibro said about deconstruction. What you ask for cannot exist within this institution, which exists to encourage incessant blather and various bad forms of engagement and argument, to flatter the unskilled while hiding from them their lack of skill, and to maintain a capitalist apparatus of consumers and money flows. All varieties of elitism that arise in such a system are a sham, because its foundations don't allow anything besides manipulative post hoc justifications of analyses. As long as the sentiments—all of which are false consciousness—"taste is subjective," "don't watch it if you don't like it," "everyone is biased," "art is interesting because there is no consensus," or that criticism is "fighting over nothing," reign in your social space where you want to analyze art, nothing will result but more of the same forum muck. And it is in the interest of anyone who benefits from plugging into this system and using it as intended for it to continue making actual analysis impossible. I mean, look!: "I Was Browsing MAL As Usual Then I Realized My Web Novel Could Become Manga." Skill in criticism generally comes from humanities departments. People who actually have this skill have spent enough time with it that they would rather do more serious things than unclog a helpless cesspool. And those like Digibro, who know only the spectacular forms of analysis and thus don't invest the time or seriousness necessary to become actual critics, can only become manipulative faux-intellectuals. I don't care what degree or lack thereof Digibro has; he is not good enough. The only anime critic I've come across who even comes close to knowing what he's talking about is Nick Creamer, and he's allowed his own political delusions to devour him like capitalism ate critical theory in the 60s and 70s. Per MacIntyre, "Moral judgments are linguistic survivals from the practices of classical theism which have lost the context provided by these practices"; in the same way asking for real criticism in the anime community is like asking why the apes in 2001: A Space Odyssey didn't just go to Jupiter themselves. Jupiter is beyond you, and nobody is coming to help you get there. All you can do if you actually appreciate the humanities and also like anime is huddle in small circles like the Albertian Order of Leibowitz. Doing so requires disowning almost all the regnant beliefs about art held by the anime community, which means nobody listening to you. |
I love him who is ashamed when the dice fall in his favour and who then asks: Am I then a cheat? – for he wants to perish. |
Mar 21, 7:37 AM
#98
They're still here. You just watched a Youtube video. That doesn't mean it was important or it enlightened you in any way. You just watched it and drew false conclusions. |
Mar 21, 8:38 AM
#99
Reply to removed-user
@SuperAdventure you still haven't explained why it is objectively crap. And yes, popularity for non kodomo series before Indian access to the internet is a good metric for quality akshually.
@Dienen Haven't explained... I was using it as an example and was not reviewing the series, but I stated this: SuperAdventure said: who claim Monogatari series with its nauseating visuals and bullshit dialogue is peak because it's popular... And it doesn't really matter if you like the series or think it's good, the elitism only comes in when you anyone claim that the reason someone doesn't like it is due to failure/inability to understand its genius. < That is elitism. |
Mar 21, 9:00 AM
#100
I never noticed Elitists but that is probably because of two reasons, I haven't been using Mal for that long (4 Months Tomorrow) And 2. I tend to only really go to forums not really related to anime like casual discussion so I haven't given myself much of a chance to encounter one either. |
More topics from this board
» 🍷 AD Summer 2025 Best Girl Contest ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Shizuna - Sep 28 |
368 |
by karrotStick
»»
2 minutes ago |
|
» The "Backstory" Problemsimonitro - Yesterday |
41 |
by AnimeEnjoyer2357
»»
5 minutes ago |
|
» ☀️ Anime Summer 2025 Male & Female Characters Tournament ( 1 2 )ISeeLifePeople - Oct 5 |
99 |
by Sensual_Yuri_69
»»
7 minutes ago |
|
» Do you actually want to marry your favorite VA?Dragevard - Oct 11 |
24 |
by Thanatos1
»»
7 minutes ago |
|
» Best combination of scary plus sexy in anime (or other mediums if you like)TheBlockernator - Yesterday |
15 |
by Lucifrost
»»
13 minutes ago |