New
Jun 16, 2019 3:55 PM
#1
I doubt it will stay in 99 for a while but it more than deserves it in my opinion, this movie is a visual masterpiece and really fascinating to think about. |
Jun 16, 2019 4:40 PM
#2
Top 100 is overrated for EoE, for my tastes. It's been a while since I watched it but I remember feeling it was kind of a lot of action and none of the moody, slow, atmospheric segments that made EVA so good. |
“In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule.” -Friedrich Nietzsche Aggregate scoring is bad for the anime fandom |
Jun 16, 2019 4:46 PM
#3
No objections here. There are some far worse anime than EoE in T100. I'd say it deserves it. |
Jun 16, 2019 5:35 PM
#4
EoE is one of the best Anime movies, better than the stuff that is in the top 10 on MAL |
Jun 16, 2019 5:42 PM
#5
So the score is going up? |
Jun 16, 2019 5:56 PM
#6
2ego said: I found the movie horrible. Not sure why and how people like it. But you think Dragon Ball and Monster are good? |
Jun 16, 2019 6:02 PM
#7
keragamming said: So the score is going up? No. It was an 8.51 in March and it still is an 8.51 now, I think other titles' scores lowered. |
Jun 16, 2019 6:34 PM
#8
99 is still insanely low. I honestly don't understand how this isn't yet in the top 10. |
Jun 16, 2019 7:44 PM
#9
Arkab said: 99 is still insanely low. I honestly don't understand how this isn't yet in the top 10. I agree completely. |
Jun 16, 2019 7:45 PM
#10
this 600mb re-encode of this movie is sitting on my harddrive for years lol i have to eventually watch this but knowing the Rebuild movies are more enjoyable to me than the TV series makes me lazy to start watching this old movie |
Jun 17, 2019 7:29 AM
#11
deg said: Watch it for those light effects. ;)this 600mb re-encode of this movie is sitting on my harddrive for years lol i have to eventually watch this but knowing the Rebuild movies are more enjoyable to me than the TV series makes me lazy to start watching this old movie |
Please learn about cel animation and its technical process. Learn how special effects and backlighting were done without computers. |
Jun 17, 2019 7:33 AM
#12
Cabron said: deg said: Watch it for those light effects. ;)this 600mb re-encode of this movie is sitting on my harddrive for years lol i have to eventually watch this but knowing the Rebuild movies are more enjoyable to me than the TV series makes me lazy to start watching this old movie ye maybe next week i will try to watch it together with Kaiba |
Jun 17, 2019 8:08 AM
#13
RIP Kaguya-sama Well one day even Perfect Blue will be in top 100 |
Jun 17, 2019 1:45 PM
#14
2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: I found the movie horrible. Not sure why and how people like it. But you think Dragon Ball and Monster are good? I sure do. Elaborate on why those two are bad. I gave my opinion in the episode discussion of Eva. Monster is monotonous and stretched out, the villain is a mary sue. Dragon Ball is the father of shonen and thus other shonen have taken it's archetypes and improved significantly on them. Plus, Dragon Ball's pacing is atrocious and the outcome is predictable. I tried to watch it last year and could not finish it. |
Jun 17, 2019 2:38 PM
#15
2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: I found the movie horrible. Not sure why and how people like it. But you think Dragon Ball and Monster are good? I sure do. Elaborate on why those two are bad. I gave my opinion in the episode discussion of Eva. Monster is monotonous and stretched out, the villain is a mary sue. Dragon Ball is the father of shonen and thus other shonen have taken it's archetypes and improved significantly on them. Plus, Dragon Ball's pacing is atrocious and the outcome is predictable. I tried to watch it last year and could not finish it. I disagree that Monster is repetitive or stretched out, each story had great depth. The villain is great, Johan had immense depth in his character, and lacking flaws doesn't imply that he's a bad villain, in fact, as a villain, he stands atop, as he is the perfect villain. Yet again, if you personally dislike long shows, don't complain as if it's an actual flaw, older anime had longer adaptations than anime these days, don't use 2019's standards in a 1986's anime. Whatever the outcome, you wouldn't be satisfied with it unless everyone died and lost, since a positive outcome seems to be regarded as "predictable" in your viewpoint. In the first Dragon Ball, in fact, many times, the characters lost, though, so I don't see how it was "predictable." To each their own, I guess. Monster is unimaginative and dull, I wanted to provide examples, but this is pointless. if you personally dislike long shows, don't complain as if it's an actual flaw, older anime had longer adaptations than anime these days, don't use 2019's standards in a 1986's anime. I really liked Yu Yu Hakusho, even though it was made in 92 and had 112 episodes worth of content. It's not my fault that the author's work (In this case, Dragon Ball) has not aged particularly well. As for older shows, I actually prefer older series over today. Dragon Ball is predictable because the characters kept on winning and winning without any loss or consequences at the very least. What consequences though? When the author provides you with many plot devices (The Dragon Balls, Saiyan power boost, senzu beans, time chamber, etc.) you really cannot lose at all. Sure, this might be Dragon Ball and they didn't have the latter three, but they still had the dragon balls right then to use when a major villain attacked and a death occurred. And sure, they might have lost the occasional tournament match or two at the Budokai Tenkaichi tournaments, but that's not really a major threat. Look at Hunter x Hunter for example, Gon might have survived after the Pitou fight through use of a plot device, but the writer was smart enough as to not give everything back to him. It makes logical sense for him to lose his nen since he used up his potential against Neferpitou. I like Dragon Ball because of nostalgia, but that's really it. |
Jun 17, 2019 2:47 PM
#16
It is in 98 now :D Eva fans unite! |
Jun 17, 2019 3:07 PM
#17
2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: I found the movie horrible. Not sure why and how people like it. But you think Dragon Ball and Monster are good? I sure do. Elaborate on why those two are bad. I gave my opinion in the episode discussion of Eva. Monster is monotonous and stretched out, the villain is a mary sue. Dragon Ball is the father of shonen and thus other shonen have taken it's archetypes and improved significantly on them. Plus, Dragon Ball's pacing is atrocious and the outcome is predictable. I tried to watch it last year and could not finish it. I disagree that Monster is repetitive or stretched out, each story had great depth. The villain is great, Johan had immense depth in his character, and lacking flaws doesn't imply that he's a bad villain, in fact, as a villain, he stands atop, as he is the perfect villain. Yet again, if you personally dislike long shows, don't complain as if it's an actual flaw, older anime had longer adaptations than anime these days, don't use 2019's standards in a 1986's anime. Whatever the outcome, you wouldn't be satisfied with it unless everyone died and lost, since a positive outcome seems to be regarded as "predictable" in your viewpoint. In the first Dragon Ball, in fact, many times, the characters lost, though, so I don't see how it was "predictable." To each their own, I guess. Monster is unimaginative and dull, I wanted to provide examples, but this is pointless. if you personally dislike long shows, don't complain as if it's an actual flaw, older anime had longer adaptations than anime these days, don't use 2019's standards in a 1986's anime. I really liked Yu Yu Hakusho, even though it was made in 92 and had 112 episodes worth of content. It's not my fault that the author's work (In this case, Dragon Ball) has not aged particularly well. As for older shows, I actually prefer older series over today. Dragon Ball is predictable because the characters kept on winning and winning without any loss or consequences at the very least. What consequences though? When the author provides you with many plot devices (The Dragon Balls, Saiyan power boost, senzu beans, time chamber, etc.) you really cannot lose at all. Sure, this might be Dragon Ball and they didn't have the latter three, but they still had the dragon balls right then to use when a major villain attacked and a death occurred. And sure, they might have lost the occasional tournament match or two at the Budokai Tenkaichi tournaments, but that's not really a major threat. Look at Hunter x Hunter for example, Gon might have survived after the Pitou fight through use of a plot device, but the writer was smart enough as to not give everything back to him. It makes logical sense for him to lose his nen since he used up his potential against Neferpitou. I like Dragon Ball because of nostalgia, but that's really it. I'm talking ONLY about the first Dragon Ball, by the way. Goku nearly died fighting against Piccolo Daimao, he was beaten up insanely bad. Goku nearly died fighting against Mercenary Tao, too, he lost miserably against them. Taking only objectivity into account, the first Dragon Ball has next to no plot-holes, while Hakusho has A LOT of them. So, we have a clear conclusion: you're judging these shows entirely on your own personal taste. End of debate. Have it your way then. You know Goku went on to annihilate Mercenary Tao after Kaorin gave him a plot device. Nearly dying or dying does not mean anything in the world of Dragon Ball, not DB nor DBZ nor any of it's other franchises since death has been made into a joke. I am pretty sure Dragon Ball has a plot hole though. The dragon balls, which are supposed to be stone for a whole year, are suddenly effective again during the Red Ribbon Army arc, which is roughly 8 months after their previous use. |
Jun 17, 2019 4:12 PM
#18
2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: I found the movie horrible. Not sure why and how people like it. But you think Dragon Ball and Monster are good? I sure do. Elaborate on why those two are bad. I gave my opinion in the episode discussion of Eva. Monster is monotonous and stretched out, the villain is a mary sue. Dragon Ball is the father of shonen and thus other shonen have taken it's archetypes and improved significantly on them. Plus, Dragon Ball's pacing is atrocious and the outcome is predictable. I tried to watch it last year and could not finish it. I disagree that Monster is repetitive or stretched out, each story had great depth. The villain is great, Johan had immense depth in his character, and lacking flaws doesn't imply that he's a bad villain, in fact, as a villain, he stands atop, as he is the perfect villain. Yet again, if you personally dislike long shows, don't complain as if it's an actual flaw, older anime had longer adaptations than anime these days, don't use 2019's standards in a 1986's anime. Whatever the outcome, you wouldn't be satisfied with it unless everyone died and lost, since a positive outcome seems to be regarded as "predictable" in your viewpoint. In the first Dragon Ball, in fact, many times, the characters lost, though, so I don't see how it was "predictable." To each their own, I guess. Monster is unimaginative and dull, I wanted to provide examples, but this is pointless. if you personally dislike long shows, don't complain as if it's an actual flaw, older anime had longer adaptations than anime these days, don't use 2019's standards in a 1986's anime. I really liked Yu Yu Hakusho, even though it was made in 92 and had 112 episodes worth of content. It's not my fault that the author's work (In this case, Dragon Ball) has not aged particularly well. As for older shows, I actually prefer older series over today. Dragon Ball is predictable because the characters kept on winning and winning without any loss or consequences at the very least. What consequences though? When the author provides you with many plot devices (The Dragon Balls, Saiyan power boost, senzu beans, time chamber, etc.) you really cannot lose at all. Sure, this might be Dragon Ball and they didn't have the latter three, but they still had the dragon balls right then to use when a major villain attacked and a death occurred. And sure, they might have lost the occasional tournament match or two at the Budokai Tenkaichi tournaments, but that's not really a major threat. Look at Hunter x Hunter for example, Gon might have survived after the Pitou fight through use of a plot device, but the writer was smart enough as to not give everything back to him. It makes logical sense for him to lose his nen since he used up his potential against Neferpitou. I like Dragon Ball because of nostalgia, but that's really it. I'm talking ONLY about the first Dragon Ball, by the way. Goku nearly died fighting against Piccolo Daimao, he was beaten up insanely bad. Goku nearly died fighting against Mercenary Tao, too, he lost miserably against them. Taking only objectivity into account, the first Dragon Ball has next to no plot-holes, while Hakusho has A LOT of them. So, we have a clear conclusion: you're judging these shows entirely on your own personal taste. End of debate. Have it your way then. You know Goku went on to annihilate Mercenary Tao after Kaorin gave him a plot device. Nearly dying or dying does not mean anything in the world of Dragon Ball, not DB nor DBZ nor any of it's other franchises since death has been made into a joke. I am pretty sure Dragon Ball has a plot hole though. The dragon balls, which are supposed to be stone for a whole year, are suddenly effective again during the Red Ribbon Army arc, which is roughly 8 months after their previous use. If you take that mindset into Dragon Ball's world, whatever they were to see, you would just find it as "bad." Dragon Ball doesn't make "death" a joke, it gives it a different atmosphere, an atmosphere that shows that their world is entirely created by the author, a creation that goes past "death." I'm sure that didn't happen, from my memories a year passed since the previous use. Fine then. Why did you find EoE bad anyways? |
Jun 17, 2019 4:52 PM
#19
2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: I found the movie horrible. Not sure why and how people like it. But you think Dragon Ball and Monster are good? I sure do. Elaborate on why those two are bad. I gave my opinion in the episode discussion of Eva. Monster is monotonous and stretched out, the villain is a mary sue. Dragon Ball is the father of shonen and thus other shonen have taken it's archetypes and improved significantly on them. Plus, Dragon Ball's pacing is atrocious and the outcome is predictable. I tried to watch it last year and could not finish it. I disagree that Monster is repetitive or stretched out, each story had great depth. The villain is great, Johan had immense depth in his character, and lacking flaws doesn't imply that he's a bad villain, in fact, as a villain, he stands atop, as he is the perfect villain. Yet again, if you personally dislike long shows, don't complain as if it's an actual flaw, older anime had longer adaptations than anime these days, don't use 2019's standards in a 1986's anime. Whatever the outcome, you wouldn't be satisfied with it unless everyone died and lost, since a positive outcome seems to be regarded as "predictable" in your viewpoint. In the first Dragon Ball, in fact, many times, the characters lost, though, so I don't see how it was "predictable." To each their own, I guess. Monster is unimaginative and dull, I wanted to provide examples, but this is pointless. if you personally dislike long shows, don't complain as if it's an actual flaw, older anime had longer adaptations than anime these days, don't use 2019's standards in a 1986's anime. I really liked Yu Yu Hakusho, even though it was made in 92 and had 112 episodes worth of content. It's not my fault that the author's work (In this case, Dragon Ball) has not aged particularly well. As for older shows, I actually prefer older series over today. Dragon Ball is predictable because the characters kept on winning and winning without any loss or consequences at the very least. What consequences though? When the author provides you with many plot devices (The Dragon Balls, Saiyan power boost, senzu beans, time chamber, etc.) you really cannot lose at all. Sure, this might be Dragon Ball and they didn't have the latter three, but they still had the dragon balls right then to use when a major villain attacked and a death occurred. And sure, they might have lost the occasional tournament match or two at the Budokai Tenkaichi tournaments, but that's not really a major threat. Look at Hunter x Hunter for example, Gon might have survived after the Pitou fight through use of a plot device, but the writer was smart enough as to not give everything back to him. It makes logical sense for him to lose his nen since he used up his potential against Neferpitou. I like Dragon Ball because of nostalgia, but that's really it. I'm talking ONLY about the first Dragon Ball, by the way. Goku nearly died fighting against Piccolo Daimao, he was beaten up insanely bad. Goku nearly died fighting against Mercenary Tao, too, he lost miserably against them. Taking only objectivity into account, the first Dragon Ball has next to no plot-holes, while Hakusho has A LOT of them. So, we have a clear conclusion: you're judging these shows entirely on your own personal taste. End of debate. Have it your way then. You know Goku went on to annihilate Mercenary Tao after Kaorin gave him a plot device. Nearly dying or dying does not mean anything in the world of Dragon Ball, not DB nor DBZ nor any of it's other franchises since death has been made into a joke. I am pretty sure Dragon Ball has a plot hole though. The dragon balls, which are supposed to be stone for a whole year, are suddenly effective again during the Red Ribbon Army arc, which is roughly 8 months after their previous use. If you take that mindset into Dragon Ball's world, whatever they were to see, you would just find it as "bad." Dragon Ball doesn't make "death" a joke, it gives it a different atmosphere, an atmosphere that shows that their world is entirely created by the author, a creation that goes past "death." I'm sure that didn't happen, from my memories a year passed since the previous use. Fine then. Why did you find EoE bad anyways? Read my opinion in the episode discussion, that's where I posted it. The movie or the series? I'm going to check out the movie one. |
Jun 17, 2019 5:14 PM
#20
2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: Optigisa said: 2ego said: I found the movie horrible. Not sure why and how people like it. But you think Dragon Ball and Monster are good? I sure do. Elaborate on why those two are bad. I gave my opinion in the episode discussion of Eva. Monster is monotonous and stretched out, the villain is a mary sue. Dragon Ball is the father of shonen and thus other shonen have taken it's archetypes and improved significantly on them. Plus, Dragon Ball's pacing is atrocious and the outcome is predictable. I tried to watch it last year and could not finish it. I disagree that Monster is repetitive or stretched out, each story had great depth. The villain is great, Johan had immense depth in his character, and lacking flaws doesn't imply that he's a bad villain, in fact, as a villain, he stands atop, as he is the perfect villain. Yet again, if you personally dislike long shows, don't complain as if it's an actual flaw, older anime had longer adaptations than anime these days, don't use 2019's standards in a 1986's anime. Whatever the outcome, you wouldn't be satisfied with it unless everyone died and lost, since a positive outcome seems to be regarded as "predictable" in your viewpoint. In the first Dragon Ball, in fact, many times, the characters lost, though, so I don't see how it was "predictable." To each their own, I guess. Monster is unimaginative and dull, I wanted to provide examples, but this is pointless. if you personally dislike long shows, don't complain as if it's an actual flaw, older anime had longer adaptations than anime these days, don't use 2019's standards in a 1986's anime. I really liked Yu Yu Hakusho, even though it was made in 92 and had 112 episodes worth of content. It's not my fault that the author's work (In this case, Dragon Ball) has not aged particularly well. As for older shows, I actually prefer older series over today. Dragon Ball is predictable because the characters kept on winning and winning without any loss or consequences at the very least. What consequences though? When the author provides you with many plot devices (The Dragon Balls, Saiyan power boost, senzu beans, time chamber, etc.) you really cannot lose at all. Sure, this might be Dragon Ball and they didn't have the latter three, but they still had the dragon balls right then to use when a major villain attacked and a death occurred. And sure, they might have lost the occasional tournament match or two at the Budokai Tenkaichi tournaments, but that's not really a major threat. Look at Hunter x Hunter for example, Gon might have survived after the Pitou fight through use of a plot device, but the writer was smart enough as to not give everything back to him. It makes logical sense for him to lose his nen since he used up his potential against Neferpitou. I like Dragon Ball because of nostalgia, but that's really it. I'm talking ONLY about the first Dragon Ball, by the way. Goku nearly died fighting against Piccolo Daimao, he was beaten up insanely bad. Goku nearly died fighting against Mercenary Tao, too, he lost miserably against them. Taking only objectivity into account, the first Dragon Ball has next to no plot-holes, while Hakusho has A LOT of them. So, we have a clear conclusion: you're judging these shows entirely on your own personal taste. End of debate. Have it your way then. You know Goku went on to annihilate Mercenary Tao after Kaorin gave him a plot device. Nearly dying or dying does not mean anything in the world of Dragon Ball, not DB nor DBZ nor any of it's other franchises since death has been made into a joke. I am pretty sure Dragon Ball has a plot hole though. The dragon balls, which are supposed to be stone for a whole year, are suddenly effective again during the Red Ribbon Army arc, which is roughly 8 months after their previous use. If you take that mindset into Dragon Ball's world, whatever they were to see, you would just find it as "bad." Dragon Ball doesn't make "death" a joke, it gives it a different atmosphere, an atmosphere that shows that their world is entirely created by the author, a creation that goes past "death." I'm sure that didn't happen, from my memories a year passed since the previous use. Fine then. Why did you find EoE bad anyways? Read my opinion in the episode discussion, that's where I posted it. The movie or the series? I'm going to check out the movie one. The series were great, the movie was not. The problem with the movie was it went completely off course, it wasn't even Evangelion anymore. Well, to each their own I guess. I think both of them were great. Shinji finally concluded his character arc at the end of it. |
Jun 17, 2019 6:21 PM
#21
Sadly once the new season arrives it's gonna fall at least 2 spots, Vinland Saga and Dr. Stone most likely are going to be at least 8.6+ rated shows (at least for a good while)... |
Jun 17, 2019 6:35 PM
#22
Arkab said: Sadly once the new season arrives it's gonna fall at least 2 spots, Vinland Saga and Dr. Stone most likely are going to be at least 8.6+ rated shows (at least for a good while)... You're right.... Kind of sad that seasonal stuff always gets an extremely high score right away (even though both those shows look promising) because I think newer fans are just really excited. I'm sure the scores will fall back later on. |
Jun 17, 2019 6:42 PM
#23
Why care about its placing? At least be glad that it's still well known, others don't get to have that luxury. |
Please learn about cel animation and its technical process. Learn how special effects and backlighting were done without computers. |
Jun 18, 2019 3:48 AM
#24
Cabron said: Why care about its placing? At least be glad that it's still well known, others don't get to have that luxury. True, I don't care for the mean score anymore. |
Jun 21, 2019 4:33 AM
#25
Rating ispure bullshit guys, just enjoy whatever the hell you enjoy. This movie is not only one of the best looking anime movies out there but it is another perfect conclussion for Evangelion. Now that it has come to Netflix, I hope it will be "better known". |
Jun 21, 2019 4:52 PM
#26
ego2 said: The series were great, the movie was not. The problem with the movie was it went completely off course, it wasn't even Evangelion anymore. This guy gets it. 15 char |
Jun 22, 2019 12:13 AM
#27
And how well does the TV series rank? It's a joke, right? Is there nothing from Kon "up there"? @mhkr Thanks. (420th ?!) Dragon Ball's style having not aged well regarding the author, this is about the anime, right? Because the comic's sense of rythm is still pretty good (be it for humour or action and action is very well rendered (especially well, compared to the TV shows). Even if I dislike the more straight/geometrical lines of the second "half", it still does justice to the mangaka's action direction. I find funny that peoples compare Yuyu and DB to give the advantage to one of them: while DB's "seriousness" and drama are not that engaging (although I was still surprised at certain "main" deaths despite the DBs existence) compared to Yuyu, this one did the same mistake as most other "heirs" of DB (Shaman King if I remember well, Naruto for a more recent example), speeding up/breaking the lighter and/or more humorous early part to reach almost immediately a tournament and higher dramatic stakes with (at that time) less bounds between reader/watcher and character(s). Note: Dragon Ball =|= "father of shônen" It's the build model for many shônen action/adventure that came in the 90s/early 00s. Just like Saint Seiya is a model for Bleach (once it took its second direction). I'm sure that Nagai, Matsumoto or the younger Rumiko Takahashi have a title that was as influential to shônen too. And I will mention Ring ni Kakero too. The father and model for shônen is certainly older and most of its ingredients are still seen in titles like DB and its "heirs". |
Rei_IIIJun 22, 2019 4:08 AM
Jun 22, 2019 12:52 AM
#29
Not a joke but not completely serious. I just wanted to say that elitist shows ranks always will go higher and higher. Perfect Blue was around 8.20 when I joined MAL but it's now 8.37. Even back in like 2011 the rating was under 8: http://web.archive.org/web/20110424225244/https://myanimelist.net/anime/437/Perfect_Blue And you can navigate through dates for more information |
Jun 23, 2019 12:02 AM
#30
There are also the more recent Eva movies that stole the spotlight, though personally I prefer EoE much more. |
Jun 23, 2019 12:37 PM
#31
YossaRedMage said: Top 100 is overrated for EoE, for my tastes. It's been a while since I watched it but I remember feeling it was kind of a lot of action and none of the moody, slow, atmospheric segments that made EVA so good. You might have watchend the wrong movie then. deg said: this 600mb re-encode of this movie is sitting on my harddrive for years lol Bluray version is now out, I suggest getting that instead. |
You all need to watch Nami. |
Sep 2, 2019 12:41 PM
#32
Ferien said: 99 is still insanely low. I honestly don't understand how this isn't yet in the top 10. Don't take MAL rankings too seriously. It only represents a the views of primarily English speaking anime fans. Additionally MAL rankings suffer massively from recency bias. This is quite normal, specially with preteens and young adults as its predominant users. The site itself is only 13 years old, and productions that are older than lets say, 2003 have a real hard time staying up in these rankings. As a general rule, whenever a show is pre 2000 I tend to add ,5 to it's ranking and if it's pre 1985 I add ,75. That gives me a much more realistic idea of the show (disclaimer: I'm not bothered by ""old"" or ""dated"" looking animation and art as a newbie would be). Another weakness with MAL rankings is sequel bias. The MAL system doesn't consolidate sequels when a series is done and as a result you end up with a lot of sequels of a popular show ranking very highly, since all the people that did not like a show or series to begin with, will maybe not watch a sequel and then that sequel only gets votes by hardcore fans. By the years 2050 about half of all the top 100 anime in MAL with be Gintama' It seems the shows fans just assign them 10's on autopilot. |
"Perhaps there is a universal, absolute truth. Perhaps it justifies every question. But that's beyond the reach of these small hands." Mamoru Oshii There is a cult of ignorance (...) nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that “my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.” Isaac Asimov |
Sep 2, 2019 12:45 PM
#33
It's one of my favorite anime movies of all time it definitely deserves it. Ferien said: 99 is still insanely low. I honestly don't understand how this isn't yet in the top 10. +1 |
Sep 17, 2019 1:56 PM
#34
mhkr said: Not ALWAYS, Paranoia Agent and Millenium Actress are going downNot a joke but not completely serious. I just wanted to say that elitist shows ranks always will go higher and higher. Perfect Blue was around 8.20 when I joined MAL but it's now 8.37. Even back in like 2011 the rating was under 8: http://web.archive.org/web/20110424225244/https://myanimelist.net/anime/437/Perfect_Blue And you can navigate through dates for more information |
Sep 17, 2019 2:10 PM
#35
Nostalgik said: OK, you're right so in most cases I guess...mhkr said: Not ALWAYS, Paranoia Agent and Millenium Actress are going downNot a joke but not completely serious. I just wanted to say that elitist shows ranks always will go higher and higher. Perfect Blue was around 8.20 when I joined MAL but it's now 8.37. Even back in like 2011 the rating was under 8: http://web.archive.org/web/20110424225244/https://myanimelist.net/anime/437/Perfect_Blue And you can navigate through dates for more information |
More topics from this board
» Is Evangelion really a work of art in what it rendered?Thecrot - Jun 5 |
25 |
by Thecrot
»»
Jun 8, 12:59 AM |
|
Poll: » Neon Genesis Evangelion - The End of Evangelion Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Zerachroma - Jun 13, 2008 |
532 |
by CheerfulChie
»»
Jun 1, 6:45 PM |
|
Poll: » Do you think Shinji is irredeemable?TASM18 - Apr 15 |
21 |
by fizzydrinkk
»»
Apr 24, 9:32 PM |
|
» should i watch this movie instead of 25-26 or should i watch 25-26 or should i watch 25-26 and the movieCRG - Aug 21, 2023 |
44 |
by Invisible_King
»»
Mar 20, 1:27 PM |
|
» There's nothing romantic about Asuka and ShinjiSanjay63773 - Oct 26, 2022 |
37 |
by LoveLikeBlood
»»
Mar 17, 1:01 PM |