People who dislikes a show for what it is shouldn't be allowed to review the anime

You said:

People who are otakuphobe like you are the one who's actually a pathetic excuse of human being for claiming jacking off to porn is better. In the end, whatever you're jacking off to, you're still jacking off. I'm actually sad on how people are still bound by these social construct bullshit to look down upon people who watch anime fanservice but think that it's fucking okay to watch Game of Thrones in public!

SigmaticDoc said:


It's not social construct, it's just that I ain't getting turned on by some drawings, especially as an artist myself. It's not easy to get turned on by some cartoons.

Also, easy there with the assumptions, I don't watch nor like GoT and I am open as fuck about anime, with my real life friends as well. It's creepy to show your ecchi anime and hentai to other people. It's not only a social construct. It's not even solely about anime, if I was with friends, it would be ok to show them porn simply cause it's not anime so therefore it's ok?

SigmaticDoc said:


It's not social construct, it's just that I ain't getting turned on by some drawings, especially as an artist myself. It's not easy to get turned on by some cartoons.

Also, easy there with the assumptions, I don't watch nor like GoT and I am open as fuck about anime, with my real life friends as well. It's creepy to show your ecchi anime and hentai to other people. It's not only a social construct. It's not even solely about anime, if I was with friends, it would be ok to show them porn simply cause it's not anime so therefore it's ok?

Zelkiiro said:
Oh look, the OP's upset that an obviously shitty series like Eromanga-sensei turned out to be shitty and doesn't like when people point it out.

Paul said:
A review from someone who loved a show and does nothing but praise it while ignoring all its flaws vs a review from someone who hated the show and does nothing but point out its flaws while ignoring all the merits. I'd say both are pretty bad, so if anything, the topic shouldn't be just about the people who dislike but people who like too much as well.

7-7 said:
Negative reviews are a good thing. Not everyone is the same, so having a diversity of opinions expressed is helpful for more people to figure out if they'll enjoy a show or not.

You said:
Well of course it's not closing any chance of the existence of character development in an ecchi show, but for me, that shouldn't be the main reasons for one to watch a comedic fanservice show. If it exists, then yeah they'll be quite a bonus. Character development is the main expectations of a psychological show, but not on comedy show.

I've talked to him once and he's like "wtf man it's 0/10" so well.

xDaril said:
So many things to say about this thread... But I am going to keep it short.

You're a special kind of stupid, aren't you?
One does not simply give a negative review if he enjoys the show.
If everyone enjoyed the shows they reviewed, there would be no negative reviews.
Different opinions and reviews exist solely cause not everyone enjoys everything.

If I don't like the show at all, be it for too much boobs are a shitty plot, I'd give it a bad review, without any bias. (Going to say what sucks about it, why it sucks and why I give the score I give it.)
Just accept it, you're salty cause nobody likes your garbage shows.

Zelkiiro said:
Oh look, the OP's upset that an obviously shitty series like Eromanga-sensei turned out to be shitty and doesn't like when people point it out.

Bozzzz said:


So what should one expect from eromanga i your opinion? If you say it doesn't need things that are main points of other genre (character development, comedy) then wjhat shoud this crap have?

flannan said:

1) You are a disgusting racist and pedophobe. You are the problem, and the only way the world can be made better is if you and people like you all die.
2) I am myself, and one person is enough of a counter-example to know that the anime is not bad, just underappreciated.
3) More importantly, I know I am honest, and I cannot know if you are honest or are actually in denial. Probably the latter, because disgusting people like you always are.

flannan said:

Opinionated authors are not a peer-reviewed publications.
Miyazaki's interview speaks about things that have nothing to do with what you're trying to claim. He is talking about animation, you know.
And I would not care what that psycho Hideaki Anno said until I know if he was off his meds that day.

flannan said:

See, you're already uncomfortable just contemplating my greatness. You lack pride, dog of the church.

Fo said:
Let's keep in mind that we're arguing about pantsu anime here.

I'm not sure how this thread even got to 4 pages.. Probably because you guys keep trying to make things political lelel.

Zelkiiro said:
Oh look, the OP's upset that an obviously shitty series like Eromanga-sensei turned out to be shitty and doesn't like when people point it out.

You said:
I hope you guys become at least literate to read the OP. I don't hate negative reviews. I hate negative reviews that makes no sense.
Have I ever said comedy is unimportant to shows like this? No.

Comedy and fanservice are the main reason people are watching this, and how it handles both of these points should be the main thing to be judged. Sure you can argue that most of the attempt to put the comedic moment are poor/half-hearted/whatever or if you like it,, good/terrific/whatever and I'll claim both reviews to be good, albeit I'll end up agreeing with just 1 of them. A good review doesn't need for me to agree with, but rather explain the main point with well-thought claim. The same goes with the fanservice.

You said:
Seriously why people are so pretentious douchebags? Reviews such as this:
https://myanimelist.net/reviews.php?id=250870
or this
https://myanimelist.net/reviews.php?id=12363
or this
https://myanimelist.net/reviews.php?id=199411
or many other that I can't list them one-by-one...

should be removed from MAL IMO. If you can't enjoy ecchi/incest/loli/fanservice/moe/whatsover in general, then you should've just say that it isn't your cup of tea. The same can be said for any other type of anime. For example me, I don't really like artsy anime so much, and I tend never try to review them. Complaining a comedic ecchi show for not having realistic character or development? Pointless fanservice when fanservice is exactly the point of the show? Helpful? Are the world full of imbeciles? Or perhaps SJW/Anti-sexuality Christians? This is why MAL reviews so shit. Get your fucking christian doctrine out of here. Look, that doesn't mean that I want all reviews to be positive. I'm okay with negative reviews, as long as the one who review it have a basic sense of enjoyment for these type of shows, for example about the same anime as the one I put on the prior example, Eromanga-sensei:
https://myanimelist.net/reviews.php?id=251201
https://myanimelist.net/reviews.php?id=246562

See the difference? It is negative, but they have love so that the review doesn't have condescending tone. Even if you have hard time enjoying these kind of shows, you must delve into the mindset of people who thinks of what makes these kind of shows are good or not, yes it's a MUST. That's called empathy. Reviews without any empathy shouldn't be allowed on MAL. Anyone agree with me? Have you ever feel triggered about the lack of empathy in anime reviews?

P.S: Regarding ecchi, I like some of it and won't be ashamed to admit that I like them. People's prude religious culture about sexuality is what's wrong and must be stopped, not the people who enjoys lewds.

CodeBlazeFate said:
Criticizing it for the kind of show it is is a problem, criticizing it for what it does wrong anyway isn't (especially if you take our as much bias as you can).

Zelkiiro said:
Oh look, the OP's upset that an obviously shitty series like Eromanga-sensei turned out to be shitty and doesn't like when people point it out.

You said:
Ugh I have a hard time understanding your post.

So you mean it's ok to watch porn together with friends but not hentai/ecchi?

What I mean is that many people watch GoT in public but nobody talked down about people who watch it for it having sex scenes but if it's ecchi, more people will look down upon the watcher because it has lewd scene? That's what I said on bull social construct. GoT has pornographic scenes, yet it's acceptable to watch it on public.

You said:
Thank you for summarizing my original post, lol

SigmaticDoc said:


Uh, no? I'm pretty sure what I said is understandable. I am positive I left a question mark at the end, making what I said a rhetoric question.
If it's ecchi, people will look down upon the watcher because it's an ecchi. One of it's main focuses is the sexualization... of cartoons at that.
Not to mention the target audience of most ecchi anime falls in the young teenager category.
GoT on the other hand is aimed at a mature audience. Though I don't really like GoT.

Tsunski said:
if this were the case then all anime would have immaculate scores from all the fanboys giving it 10's

Red_Ryu12345 said:
I disagree, listening to perspectives that hate those kinds of shows are important for understanding other people and why those shows have problems.

From said perspectives you can use it to determine if that show is for you if you can relate to the reviews.

For example I also gave Eromanga Sensei a 1/10 because it is a show about literally nothing, nothing happens and some girls want to sleep with her not blood related brother but nothing happens from it. It's also trying stupidly hard to chase meme culture and I lothe any show that does that. Anime or not.

What a surprise almost every negative review for Eromanga I agree with. Even if a show or something is not for them, understand why can be important to someone else and be insightful for not only them but creators who want to learn from it and make something better or in a way that works for other audiences.

You said:
Do you even read?

You said:
]Then you might not like 90% show under slice of life tag, lol

You said:

Pretty sure there's quite a lot of ecchi genre on seinen demographic too instead of just shounen, which means it's aimed for guys who are above 18. Now tell me if that ain't mature? lol

Manaban said:
man this thread ain't shit

Xaelath said:

Fair points.
but thats on my perspective, i know they had to cramp all the stuff in 12 episodes which end up a trainwreck.
When i mention about op and animations it was about the Fans praised the anime because of the opening and the edgy character.
Proper adaptation necessary unless the original route/anime route give the same or better impression than the source, for example its Koe no Katachi.
but its still bad.
I dont know why you mentioned "i dont watch anime because of the animation and music".
OP would be the first impressions, bgm would be the filler gap, ED supposed to be a closure, with good tone you could make a summary of the anime without even watching it.

The animation is bad, very bad for its standard. Its equal to something like Isekai no smartphone no tomo ni. I dont expect much for a pierrot studio.

SlightlyPebbled said:
It's cause you said you didn't give a shit about the animation and the music, and when it comes to anime these are like 2/4 main features. I'd say you still need to credit anime for that even though the story may be bad.

Red_Ryu12345 said:


I enjoy slice of life when it has a story or characters that actually matter or are likable. They aren't just a fetish/walking fanservice or some meme, which is pretty much everyone in the show outside of the main character who is generic light novel harem protagonist.

SigmaticDoc said:


There's a lot of ecchi genre on the seinen demographic, but it doesn't even come close to the ecchi on shonen demographic...

Jakerams said:
Honestly I'd just force people to pass a test for each series before being able to score or review it. It stops the people who did not pay attention or were stupid to not be able to harm a series statistically.

chunng said:
I agree with what you are trying to say. I have seen many people complain about "too much fan service" on some obviously fan service focused ecchi series, or "nothing happens" on slice of life series.

That is no difference from saying "Clannad is bad because it makes me sad."

What these people are complaining about isn't about that specific anime, but the entirety of genre, which is stupid to be a reason for why he/she views that series negatively.

flannan said:
Actually, "that's just your opinion" is a valid argument when somebody is trying to push his opinion onto other people.

chunng said:
I agree with what you are trying to say. I have seen many people complain about "too much fan service" on some obviously fan service focused ecchi series, or "nothing happens" on slice of life series.

That is no difference from saying "Clannad is bad because it makes me sad."

What these people are complaining about isn't about that specific anime, but the entirety of genre, which is stupid to be a reason for why he/she views that series negatively.