New
Jan 1, 8:39 AM
#101
Reply to TransferUser
inklingboi08 said:
it's completely normal for people to take offense to the objectification and sexualization of underaged women
it's completely normal for people to take offense to the objectification and sexualization of underaged women
On Halloween many underage women dress like sluts and no one seems to care.
Anime do not objectify/sexualize underage women.
@TransferUser Underage woman is an oxymoron, correct term is underage girl. |
Jan 1, 8:40 AM
#102
I havent watched anime in 2 or 3 months, I am the definition of tourist (love to travel + far-left politically) but these discussions keep me coming back to anime discussion. kutuya said: she is too hot for American politics, if the Americans dont like her then we should get her instead(AOC had to apologize for this 2 years ago but she recently removed them again. The tide is turning) |
Jan 1, 8:53 AM
#103
Reply to JoeChip
@JoeChip Is this begging the question? Also why I think we should do away with both the words "girl" and "woman" and use "female" instead. It might be offensive to some females, but at least it's grammatically correct. The second best kind of correct. |
Jan 1, 8:54 AM
#104
Reply to TransferUser
inklingboi08 said:
it's completely normal for people to take offense to the objectification and sexualization of underaged women
it's completely normal for people to take offense to the objectification and sexualization of underaged women
On Halloween many underage women dress like sluts and no one seems to care.
Anime do not objectify/sexualize underage women.
@TransferUser I.... I don't even know what to say to this. Anime doesn't objectify or sexualize underaged women? What about like... all of hentai and ecchi and fanservice scenes? Sure, sometimes the women are over 18... oftentimes they aren't. Also, way to slutshame. Yes, underaged girls can wear revealing clothing. One, that doesn't mean people don't care. Two, that doesn't give YOU the right to objectify THEM for the way they dress. As the old adage goes, costume/cosplay is NOT consent. |
If you're hungry, eat! |
Jan 1, 8:59 AM
#105
Reply to Zarutaku
inklingboy08 said:
I mean, it's completely normal for people to take offense to the objectification and sexualization of drawings. That's not a Japanese or western ideal. It's not prude to think that ecchi is weird. I think ecchi is weird. I recognize the culture of the art, but I'm also blue-pilled enough to know that Japanese people think that shit is weird too. It's respectful to Japanese culture to think ecchi or lolis are weird.
I mean, it's completely normal for people to take offense to the objectification and sexualization of drawings. That's not a Japanese or western ideal. It's not prude to think that ecchi is weird. I think ecchi is weird. I recognize the culture of the art, but I'm also blue-pilled enough to know that Japanese people think that shit is weird too. It's respectful to Japanese culture to think ecchi or lolis are weird.
You could join the Olympics with your advanced mental gymnastics.
@Zarutaku No... no I couldn't. First of all, you edited my words. Secondly, I'M RIGHT. Go to Japan. Ask Japanese women if they find ecchi or hentai to be completely normal and unobjectionable. I'm following simple logic here. Anime sexualization and general objectification of women, anime or otherwise, is not Japanese culture. Criticizing it is not disrespectful to Japanese culture. There's a reason all Japanese phones are required to always have the shutter sound on for the camera, so creeps don't take nonconsensual pictures of women. |
If you're hungry, eat! |
Jan 1, 9:02 AM
#106
Reply to WaterMage
@inklingboi08 keep your opinion to you you don't need to shit it out in twitter or tiktok to validate yourself. If you don't like it don't watch other people watch and enjoy it you don't have any right to demean them.
If you think ecchi is bad and should be banned then everything pornographic soft or hardcore also should be banned. Will you want that no nah?. Lots of it also include minors. But this won't stop so why does ecchi anime need it to.
Even if certain portion of japanese people don't like it (I am sure there are) they doesn't start hate wagon on internet like westoids.
If you think ecchi is bad and should be banned then everything pornographic soft or hardcore also should be banned. Will you want that no nah?. Lots of it also include minors. But this won't stop so why does ecchi anime need it to.
Even if certain portion of japanese people don't like it (I am sure there are) they doesn't start hate wagon on internet like westoids.
@WaterMage I'm not demeaning the people who watch it, I'm demeaning the content within it. I'm not saying it should be banned, I'm saying the sexualization of girls STATED TO BE UNDERAGED BY THE CREATORS is wrong. You can't confirm a girl is a 16 year old highschooler and then always have her tits out. |
If you're hungry, eat! |
Jan 1, 9:05 AM
#107
Reply to LSSJ_Chloe
@thewiru
I am an artist so I see things from perspective of nothing is perfect. Every piece of art, which animation falls under, will have some sort of flaws because we humans are imperfect in nature. Whenever I experience a work of fiction I will notice flaws and critique them even if it is in a work I enjoy. A great example of this would be with video games as I have recently played through Yakuza Kiwami and while I enjoyed my time with the game, I had issues with how some elements of the game were handled compared to the original 2005 Yakuza. This led to me writing a list of what I think each game handled better for a video idea I had lined up about remakes of games. If I just read out the list of what I saw as flaws in the game, it would sound like I hate the game, but that paints an incomplete picture because even if I enjoyed Kiwami a lot, the negative emotions tend to ring louder and stand out more in conversation for most people compared to the positive ones. Therefore criticisms can echo louder than praise even if both are given in the same conversation. This is generally what I mean when I say I tend to consume media critically and how one can still analyze flaws in something they like while still enjoying it.
I am an artist so I see things from perspective of nothing is perfect. Every piece of art, which animation falls under, will have some sort of flaws because we humans are imperfect in nature. Whenever I experience a work of fiction I will notice flaws and critique them even if it is in a work I enjoy. A great example of this would be with video games as I have recently played through Yakuza Kiwami and while I enjoyed my time with the game, I had issues with how some elements of the game were handled compared to the original 2005 Yakuza. This led to me writing a list of what I think each game handled better for a video idea I had lined up about remakes of games. If I just read out the list of what I saw as flaws in the game, it would sound like I hate the game, but that paints an incomplete picture because even if I enjoyed Kiwami a lot, the negative emotions tend to ring louder and stand out more in conversation for most people compared to the positive ones. Therefore criticisms can echo louder than praise even if both are given in the same conversation. This is generally what I mean when I say I tend to consume media critically and how one can still analyze flaws in something they like while still enjoying it.
@LSSJ_Gaming I fear you may be the only sane person in this thread. Everyone else seems to have their hands actively wrapped around their dick saying "How DARE you insult my love of underaged big breasted teenage girls! It's art!" Someone went so far as to edit my words and say I went through "mental gymnastics" to make my point. Can you block people on MAL? |
If you're hungry, eat! |
Jan 1, 9:31 AM
#108
Reply to thewiru
09philj said:
Do you not have porn? Do you not have erotica? Can you not go five minutes without seeing some jiggle? What is the point of it? This is not about censorship.
Do you not have porn? Do you not have erotica? Can you not go five minutes without seeing some jiggle? What is the point of it? This is not about censorship.
Imagine how it would feel if someone asked for more representation in movies and you answered with "DO YOU NOT HAVE BASKETBALL? DO YOU NOT HAVE RAP? CAN YOU NOT GO FIVE MINUTES WITHOUT SEEING SOME AFRICANS? WHAT IS THE POINT OF IT? THIS IS NOT ABOUT CENSORSHIP.".
Because that's how you sound right now.
Thinking 👏 that 👏 human 👏 sexuality 👏 should 👏 be 👏 segregated 👏 is 👏 fascism.
@thewiru these are vastly different issues... A horny person wanting rep is not the same as a whole race being left out. And why does your mind immediately go to black people? 🤔 |
Jan 1, 9:35 AM
#109
Reply to inklingboi08
@LSSJ_Gaming I fear you may be the only sane person in this thread. Everyone else seems to have their hands actively wrapped around their dick saying "How DARE you insult my love of underaged big breasted teenage girls! It's art!"
Someone went so far as to edit my words and say I went through "mental gymnastics" to make my point. Can you block people on MAL?
Someone went so far as to edit my words and say I went through "mental gymnastics" to make my point. Can you block people on MAL?
@inklingboi08 you can but for some stupid reason they limit how many people you are able to unless you pay money |
This post is brought to you by your local transfem gamer goblin. Will not tolerate bigotry and will fight against "anti-woke" sentiment to make the anime community a safer place. |
Jan 1, 9:39 AM
#110
Reply to inklingboi08
@TransferUser I.... I don't even know what to say to this. Anime doesn't objectify or sexualize underaged women? What about like... all of hentai and ecchi and fanservice scenes? Sure, sometimes the women are over 18... oftentimes they aren't.
Also, way to slutshame. Yes, underaged girls can wear revealing clothing. One, that doesn't mean people don't care. Two, that doesn't give YOU the right to objectify THEM for the way they dress. As the old adage goes, costume/cosplay is NOT consent.
Also, way to slutshame. Yes, underaged girls can wear revealing clothing. One, that doesn't mean people don't care. Two, that doesn't give YOU the right to objectify THEM for the way they dress. As the old adage goes, costume/cosplay is NOT consent.
@inklingboi08 Ecchi and hentai are targeted towards guys who pay for that specifically the same way fujoshi pay for good looking guys in bl so that make your argument hypocrite since you only acknowledge one side while forgetting the other. |
Jan 1, 9:41 AM
#111
Reply to Otakupervert890
@inklingboi08 Ecchi and hentai are targeted towards guys who pay for that specifically the same way fujoshi pay for good looking guys in bl so that make your argument hypocrite since you only acknowledge one side while forgetting the other.
@Otakupervert890 No, the fetishization of gay men is problematic as well. |
If you're hungry, eat! |
Jan 1, 9:42 AM
#112
Reply to thewiru
@LSSJ_Gaming
I don't think you can, though, just like you can't separate a person from their bones.
It would make no sense for someone in the XIX century to say "Well, I support the southern cotton industry, but I'm critical of the concept of slavery".
That's why it makes no sense to me and I can't comprehend it, "consuming a thing critically" is still consuming a thing. "Critically" isn't a magical word.
It makes even less sense to me when it comes to ecchi and loli because that person will live in the community for years, will see that the "apocalypse" they thought would happen because of those things never actually happened, but for some reason will still choose to be against them because... just because.
I don't think you can, though, just like you can't separate a person from their bones.
It would make no sense for someone in the XIX century to say "Well, I support the southern cotton industry, but I'm critical of the concept of slavery".
That's why it makes no sense to me and I can't comprehend it, "consuming a thing critically" is still consuming a thing. "Critically" isn't a magical word.
It makes even less sense to me when it comes to ecchi and loli because that person will live in the community for years, will see that the "apocalypse" they thought would happen because of those things never actually happened, but for some reason will still choose to be against them because... just because.
@thewiru A weird comparison again... For the anti-woke to be so anti-black, y'all are really obsessed with us... |
Jan 1, 9:42 AM
#113
Reply to inklingboi08
@Otakupervert890 No, the fetishization of gay men is problematic as well.
@inklingboi08 then where are you then? Why are you only here for thread when women is in question but not men? |
Jan 1, 9:44 AM
#114
Reply to Otakupervert890
@inklingboi08 then where are you then? Why are you only here for thread when women is in question but not men?
@Otakupervert890 Nobody brought up that topic so I didn't discuss it until now. I think both issues are problematic. You're just arguing for the sake of argument at this point. I acknowledge both and find both to be problematic. |
If you're hungry, eat! |
Jan 1, 9:44 AM
#115
Reply to inklingboi08
@TransferUser I.... I don't even know what to say to this. Anime doesn't objectify or sexualize underaged women? What about like... all of hentai and ecchi and fanservice scenes? Sure, sometimes the women are over 18... oftentimes they aren't.
Also, way to slutshame. Yes, underaged girls can wear revealing clothing. One, that doesn't mean people don't care. Two, that doesn't give YOU the right to objectify THEM for the way they dress. As the old adage goes, costume/cosplay is NOT consent.
Also, way to slutshame. Yes, underaged girls can wear revealing clothing. One, that doesn't mean people don't care. Two, that doesn't give YOU the right to objectify THEM for the way they dress. As the old adage goes, costume/cosplay is NOT consent.
inklingboi08 said: Yes, underaged girls can wear revealing clothing. @inklingboi08 inklingboi08 said: As the old adage goes, costume/cosplay is NOT consent. Wearing provocative outfits absolutely is consent to be viewed sexually, otherwise you are expecting everyone who has line of sight to you to put thumbtacks in their eyes. Obviously if you go out looking like this people are going to view you a certain way, that's the entire point (image taken from an actual sexy nurse costume on Amazon): Dressing like this and then being upset that people are viewing you sexually is just bipolar. It's having your cake and eating it too. |
Jan 1, 9:46 AM
#116
It feels like inklingboi08 found his way from Twitter to here by mistkae |
Jan 1, 9:49 AM
#117
Reply to kutuya
LSSJ_Gaming said:
I am trans
I am trans
@LSSJ_Gaming This is known.
LSSJ_Gaming said:
and that scene while not the best representation is rather harmless in the grand scheme of things.
and that scene while not the best representation is rather harmless in the grand scheme of things.
Yeah except for all the jobs that will be lost because this shit doesn't sell, not to mention all the actual females who increasingly get harassed for not putting their "pronouns" in their bio (AOC had to apologize for this 2 years ago but she recently removed them again. The tide is turning) the more this retarded ideology for deranged narcissists takes hold.
LSSJ_Gaming said:
Like it doesn't read like a trans person wrote this but there's at least sentiment that they were trying to be understanding and empathetic even if it was not handled perfectly.
Like it doesn't read like a trans person wrote this but there's at least sentiment that they were trying to be understanding and empathetic even if it was not handled perfectly.
Who cares? Everyone hates it and and even you admit it's objectively dogshit, no one wants to be subjected to some mentally ill dementoid trauma-dumping through a once-beloved franchise.
LSSJ_Gaming said:
Besides there are a lot of great media that tackle the queer experience, and some with trans stuff specifically.
Besides there are a lot of great media that tackle the queer experience, and some with trans stuff specifically.
Dragon Age was never about that, make your own shit instead of infesting existing franchises you parasites.
If Veilguard hadn't been attached to an existing IP, it would've been another Concord or Dustborn, only reason it sold at all it was wearing the Dragon Age franchise as a skin suit.
LSSJ_Gaming said:
You're only complaining because you just don't like the fact that the social issues tackled are about trans people
You're only complaining because you just don't like the fact that the social issues tackled are about trans people
Where did I even complain? I just used it as an example of something that was different than the type of sociopolitical commentary found in games like Bioshock and Deus Ex.
There's nothing being "tackled" anyway, there's zero depth or nuance to it, it's the writing equivalent of a drug-addicted whore covered in tattoos.
I may as well have pointed out that there's a fundamental difference between the works of Shakespeare and the word "queen" written above some cunt's cunt.
LSSJ_Gaming said:
but its important for trans stories to be told
but its important for trans stories to be told
It's important that not every fucking franchise normal people used to like gets co-opted and turned into a diary for people who would've been in a mental institute the century prior.
LSSJ_Gaming said:
especially now when there's a lot of hate towards us
especially now when there's a lot of hate towards us
The hate tranoids send towards actual femoids eclipses the hate tranoids get to an incredible degree.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPjekYTeD4s
The rhetoric shown in this video is the same I've seen countless times before, completely fair, level-headed skepticism of some aspect of tranism is characterized as violence that will inevitably lead to Total Troon Death™ in order to justify their own explicitly violent rhetoric, so I actually don't give a shit how many threads 4chan has where people have fun posting videos of tranoids getting killed.
LSSJ_Gaming said:
as positive portrayals in media can help break down the barriers and make people more accepting over time.
as positive portrayals in media can help break down the barriers and make people more accepting over time.
Peak tranoid acceptance has passed, not too long ago people were relatively fine with people letting their cross-dressing fetish define them, but your greed got ahead of you, the women's sports and bathrooms were just too juicy for you, it wasn't enough that people used your preferred pronouns, it also had to be a hate crime if they didn't, you pushed too hard and the pendulum swung right back in the other direction, and there's no going back (I know that's not how pendulums work, you don't have to write me an entire paragraph about them)
LSSJ_Gaming said:
Also tf you mean "anti-woke Golem".
Also tf you mean "anti-woke Golem".
I'd ask you to forgive me for suffering a minor brain-fart and forgetting to write "anti" twice, but I did actually write "anti-anti-woke golem", you just overlooked the second "anti" for the same reason you overlooked the second "and" back in the third section of this post.
Although I doubt you actually had trouble understanding what I said, irrespective of whether you noticed the number of "anti"'s was even or odd.
LSSJ_Gaming said:
The Jewish Golem is a metaphorical creature in Judaism that protects the Jews from hateful attacks. If one was an "anti-woke" golem that would literally be the opposite of your perception of me as that would more mean "one who protects bigotry and social injustice" as in AAVE "woke" is defined as "an awareness of social injustices", so anti woke would be the opposite which therefore makes your attempted insult fall on its face as it makes very little logical sense when applying the theological origin of the golem, the use of the term "woke" and the prefix anti.
The Jewish Golem is a metaphorical creature in Judaism that protects the Jews from hateful attacks. If one was an "anti-woke" golem that would literally be the opposite of your perception of me as that would more mean "one who protects bigotry and social injustice" as in AAVE "woke" is defined as "an awareness of social injustices", so anti woke would be the opposite which therefore makes your attempted insult fall on its face as it makes very little logical sense when applying the theological origin of the golem, the use of the term "woke" and the prefix anti.
@kutuya Doesn't a subsect of the anime community fetishize trans people? Aren't traps a thing? |
Jan 1, 9:51 AM
#118
Reply to kutuya
@Nutella71 Tell us you do leave your wife's bedroom every time Tyrone comes over without telling us you do leave your wife's bedroom every time Tyrone comes over.
@kutuya Another reference to a black person... It's weird how y'all don't want black people in your shows or games, but y'all constantly mention us. |
Jan 1, 9:54 AM
#119
LuxuriousHeart said: Traps have absolutely no innate relation to transexuals whatsoever, and shouldn't be conflated with them.Doesn't a subsect of the anime community fetishize trans people? Aren't traps a thing? |
Jan 1, 9:55 AM
#120
Ironically, the people calling other tourists, are tourists themselves. A lot of those throwing the term around mostly watch Ecchi and harem Isekai series. They think they're cultured because of it. And they conveniently ignore that a lot of the Western shows they dislike, were inspired by anime. |
Jan 1, 9:57 AM
#121
Reply to LuxuriousHeart
Ironically, the people calling other tourists, are tourists themselves. A lot of those throwing the term around mostly watch Ecchi and harem Isekai series. They think they're cultured because of it. And they conveniently ignore that a lot of the Western shows they dislike, were inspired by anime.
@LuxuriousHeart Funny how you people always target us ecchi fans out of nowhere. The fuck we ever do to you? Fuck outta here, I'm tired of this ecchi fan bashing shit you people like to do here lately. |
"Well, she's flatter than a pancake" -Mimi Alpacas |
Jan 1, 10:03 AM
#122
inklingboy08 said: Yes... yes I could. First of all, you corrected my words. Secondly, I'M WRONG. Go to Japan. Ask Japanese women if they find yaoi to be completely normal and unobjectionable. I'm following faulty logic here. Anime sexualization and general objectification of drawings, anime or otherwise, is not Japanese culture. Criticizing it is respectful to Japanese culture. There's a reason all Japanese phones are required to always have the shutter sound on for the camera, so shoujo don't take nonconsensual pictures of ikemen. Boy is about to win the gold medal... |
No, this isn't my signature. |
Jan 1, 10:08 AM
#123
I have never heard anyone referred to as an anime tourist, I have never considered referring to anyone as an anime tourist... I am now plagued by a mental puzzle of what would an anime russian tourist be... pushing into a digital queue while wearing a chainsaw man medallion? |
Jan 1, 10:14 AM
#124
LuxuriousHeart said: Doesn't a subsect of the anime community fetishize trans people? Aren't traps a thing? @LuxuriousHeart There's traps and otoko no ko/femboy (男の娘) (men who dress/look effeminate), shemale and futanari (women with male genitalia), and of course the elusive "cuntboy" (men with female genitalia), none of which are the same as tranoids, although I will concede shemales and cuntboys come pretty close, although they are almost nonexistent within non-R18 animanga. The closest is TS (transexual)/genderbend, which is when someone is changed from one sex to the other (Ranma, Onimai) Of course there are sometimes actual tranoids in animanga, but they are rare, it's not something I recall ever encountering, except maybe all the trannies (that's how it's been translated, I'm not familiar with the Japanese term) in Gintama. LuxuriousHeart said: Another reference to a black person... It's weird how y'all don't want black people in your shows or games, but y'all constantly mention us. Please take that back, Nutella71's wife's boyfriend is not defined by the tone of his skin or anything so arbitrary, he's every bit as human as the rest of us, maybe even an inch or two more. |
Jan 1, 12:39 PM
#125
Reply to inklingboi08
@TransferUser I.... I don't even know what to say to this. Anime doesn't objectify or sexualize underaged women? What about like... all of hentai and ecchi and fanservice scenes? Sure, sometimes the women are over 18... oftentimes they aren't.
Also, way to slutshame. Yes, underaged girls can wear revealing clothing. One, that doesn't mean people don't care. Two, that doesn't give YOU the right to objectify THEM for the way they dress. As the old adage goes, costume/cosplay is NOT consent.
Also, way to slutshame. Yes, underaged girls can wear revealing clothing. One, that doesn't mean people don't care. Two, that doesn't give YOU the right to objectify THEM for the way they dress. As the old adage goes, costume/cosplay is NOT consent.
inklingboi08 said: I.... I don't even know what to say to this. Anime doesn't objectify or sexualize underaged women? What about like... all of hentai and ecchi and fanservice scenes? Can you elaborate how this is supposed to work? I can't wrap my head around how an anime is supposed to objectify a woman. It's just drawings. inklingboi08 said: Also, way to slutshame. How exactly is pointing out that little girls dress like sluts on Halloween slutshaming? It seems you are confused about what words mean. |
Jan 1, 12:49 PM
#126
Reply to LuxuriousHeart
@thewiru these are vastly different issues... A horny person wanting rep is not the same as a whole race being left out. And why does your mind immediately go to black people? 🤔
@LuxuriousHeart Analogy Cognitive process of transferring information or meaning from a particular subject to another From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Analogy (disambiguation). Analogy is a comparison or correspondence between two things (or two groups of things) because of a third element that they are considered to share. In logic, it is an inference or an argument from one particular to another particular, as opposed to deduction, induction, and abduction. It is also used of where at least one of the premises, or the conclusion, is general rather than particular in nature. It has the general form A is to B as C is to D. In a broader sense, analogical reasoning is a cognitive process of transferring some information or meaning of a particular subject (the analog, or source) onto another (the target); and also the linguistic expression corresponding to such a process. The term analogy can also refer to the relation between the source and the target themselves, which is often (though not always) a similarity, as in the biological notion of analogy. Ernest Rutherford's model of the atom (modified by Niels Bohr) made an analogy between the atom and the Solar System. Analogy plays a significant role in human thought processes. It has been argued that analogy lies at "the core of cognition". Both are the same thing: One side wants the thing/group they like integrated into mainstream stuff, the other side says this isn't necessary because "If you want to see that thing/group so much, you can go to a place segregated from the mainstream which is 100% focused on that thing/group", not noticing that it misses the point (To have it integrated into the mainstream). |
Jan 1, 12:50 PM
#127
Reply to LuxuriousHeart
@thewiru A weird comparison again... For the anti-woke to be so anti-black, y'all are really obsessed with us...
@LuxuriousHeart ...am I anti-woke? ........................ |
Jan 1, 1:00 PM
#128
It's worth pointing out that these are the same people programmed to watch western television. These people think the same jokes run into the ground back in the 80s is peak TV. Tourists have been brainwashed to think that entertainment must be clean first, entertaining last. They seem evangelical almost in their belief of clean undies walking by homeless screeching profanities and enormous wealth inequality. They aren't moral, because that takes action. Rather they are judgmental about a philosophy they don't even believe in, so basically pilgrims. |
Jan 1, 1:01 PM
#129
Reply to removed-user
I think "tourist" is a dumb term, all things considered. It relies on the idea that one must be familiar with Japanese media culture to be able to properly critique works, but there are two issues with this.
Firstly, Japanese media culture is only a small aspect of Japanese culture. There are many Japanese folks who do not like many of the anime some fans dislike for similar reasons. "That weird anime shit" here is often "that weird anime shit" in Japan as well. Believe it or not, Mushoku Tensei is not a universally beloved property among domestic audiences, or is Uzamaid. It makes the tacit assumption that the Japanese love all anime like Mushoku Tensei as if they were a monolith whose opinion on anime is simply "Japanese=Good".
This makes me angry because people are basically saying that every Japanese person likes even the weirdest and arguably "most depraved" shit in anime and manga, which is a disservice to the people they are purportedly defending. "So you do not like X anime? You must be a tourist", as if actual Japanese folks by contrast love X anime. I actually like some weirder and arguably depraved work, but I am not going to defend it by claiming its detractors are not Japanese or well-acquainted with Japanese culture.
What the heck do you think the average Japanese person would say about this anime?
Secondy, it assumes you need to watch anime to know what is "good storytelling to you", but I think this is wrong. Of course things should be understood in the original context of their culture, but that does not invalidate criticisms, if criticisms could even be valid or invalid in the first place. What is "good" does not change with culture, even if the contexts of certain scenes does. For example, Oldboy (2003) is a great movie, and though a fuller appreciation does require some understanding of Korean culture, perfect knowledge of Korean customs is not needed to simply watch it and say it is a masterclass in film-making. Good stories are more or less 'universal" in the same way music is. You cannot simply hit a bunch of keys on a piano and expect good music. There is logic in taste, and this extends to storytelling.
I argue people who watch only anime are the least able to provide thoughtful commentary on it. People who resort to this sort of gatekeeping are the same sort of people who watch Critical Drinker. It is not protecting anime so much as fostering an echo chamber on the basis of defending some perceived ethnocentric ethnostate, because they cannot welcome criticism as anything other than a personal attack.
I think the biggest headache is how vague these defenses are. What about Japanese culture do I not understand that keeps me from appreciating this anime I think is just bad? For example, if I wanted to defend one of the decisions in Oldboy (2003), I could type the following.
I never heard any such defense for the anime I disliked.
Firstly, Japanese media culture is only a small aspect of Japanese culture. There are many Japanese folks who do not like many of the anime some fans dislike for similar reasons. "That weird anime shit" here is often "that weird anime shit" in Japan as well. Believe it or not, Mushoku Tensei is not a universally beloved property among domestic audiences, or is Uzamaid. It makes the tacit assumption that the Japanese love all anime like Mushoku Tensei as if they were a monolith whose opinion on anime is simply "Japanese=Good".
This makes me angry because people are basically saying that every Japanese person likes even the weirdest and arguably "most depraved" shit in anime and manga, which is a disservice to the people they are purportedly defending. "So you do not like X anime? You must be a tourist", as if actual Japanese folks by contrast love X anime. I actually like some weirder and arguably depraved work, but I am not going to defend it by claiming its detractors are not Japanese or well-acquainted with Japanese culture.
What the heck do you think the average Japanese person would say about this anime?
Secondy, it assumes you need to watch anime to know what is "good storytelling to you", but I think this is wrong. Of course things should be understood in the original context of their culture, but that does not invalidate criticisms, if criticisms could even be valid or invalid in the first place. What is "good" does not change with culture, even if the contexts of certain scenes does. For example, Oldboy (2003) is a great movie, and though a fuller appreciation does require some understanding of Korean culture, perfect knowledge of Korean customs is not needed to simply watch it and say it is a masterclass in film-making. Good stories are more or less 'universal" in the same way music is. You cannot simply hit a bunch of keys on a piano and expect good music. There is logic in taste, and this extends to storytelling.
I argue people who watch only anime are the least able to provide thoughtful commentary on it. People who resort to this sort of gatekeeping are the same sort of people who watch Critical Drinker. It is not protecting anime so much as fostering an echo chamber on the basis of defending some perceived ethnocentric ethnostate, because they cannot welcome criticism as anything other than a personal attack.
I think the biggest headache is how vague these defenses are. What about Japanese culture do I not understand that keeps me from appreciating this anime I think is just bad? For example, if I wanted to defend one of the decisions in Oldboy (2003), I could type the following.
Dumplings are considered a side-dish in Korean cuisine, so our protaganist was essentially fed, or implied to have been fed, someone's side dish for the last 15 years
I never heard any such defense for the anime I disliked.
@ryzxgum Really? I found it quite weak. PeripheralVision said: I think "tourist" is a dumb term, all things considered. It relies on the idea that one must be familiar with Japanese media culture to be able to properly critique works, but there are two issues with this. Firstly, Japanese media culture is only a small aspect of Japanese culture. Stop interpreting it so "literally". Yes, it's about familiarity with otaku oriented media as a whole. That otaku oriented media is only a part of Japanese culture is of no importance, people area aware (Or at least should be, since it isn't exactly hidden) that otaku culture is a sub-culture. PeripheralVision said: There are many Japanese folks who do not like many of the anime some fans dislike for similar reasons. "That weird anime shit" here is often "that weird anime shit" in Japan as well. ...we know, normies exist everywhere. As I've said, otaku culture is a sub-culture. PeripheralVision said: Believe it or not, Mushoku Tensei is not a universally beloved property among domestic audiences, or is Uzamaid. It makes the tacit assumption that the Japanese love all anime like Mushoku Tensei as if they were a monolith whose opinion on anime is simply "Japanese=Good". Irrelevant, it's one of the most sold LN series. As fair as it is concerned, that the closest to "universally beloved" you can get on otaku oriented media. PeripheralVision said: This makes me angry because people are basically saying that every Japanese person likes even the weirdest and arguably "most depraved" shit in anime and manga, which is a disservice to the people they are purportedly defending. "So you do not like X anime? You must be a tourist", as if actual Japanese folks by contrast love X anime. I actually like some weirder and arguably depraved work, but I am not going to defend it by claiming its detractors are not Japanese or well-acquainted with Japanese culture. Once again, you're taking the term too literally. PeripheralVision said: Secondy, it assumes you need to watch anime to know what is "good storytelling to you", but I think this is wrong. Of course things should be understood in the original context of their culture, but that does not invalidate criticisms, if criticisms could even be valid or invalid in the first place. What is "good" does not change with culture, even if the contexts of certain scenes does. For example, Oldboy (2003) is a great movie, and though a fuller appreciation does require some understanding of Korean culture, perfect knowledge of Korean customs is not needed to simply watch it and say it is a masterclass in film-making. Good stories are more or less 'universal" in the same way music is. You cannot simply hit a bunch of keys on a piano and expect good music. There is logic in taste, and this extends to storytelling. If a person said that a theater play was bad by cinema metrics, we would say that person is silly. The same applies here: In order to fully and fairly judge anime, one must understand it's language, conventions and what it is trying to do, and usually the best way to do that is by watching a lot of anime. PeripheralVision said: People who resort to this sort of gatekeeping are the same sort of people who watch Critical Drinker. Well, I don't. Quite the opposite, in fact. |
Jan 1, 1:06 PM
#130
Reply to LuxuriousHeart
Ironically, the people calling other tourists, are tourists themselves. A lot of those throwing the term around mostly watch Ecchi and harem Isekai series. They think they're cultured because of it. And they conveniently ignore that a lot of the Western shows they dislike, were inspired by anime.
LuxuriousHeart said: And they conveniently ignore that a lot of the Western shows they dislike, were inspired by anime. ...do they? I've never seen anyone ignore or deny it, we usually just complain that the inspirations tend to be just surface level. |
Jan 1, 1:29 PM
#131
Reply to Tropisch
@LuxuriousHeart Funny how you people always target us ecchi fans out of nowhere. The fuck we ever do to you? Fuck outta here, I'm tired of this ecchi fan bashing shit you people like to do here lately.
@Tropisch Y'all are the main ones calling people tourist and normies, and y'all seem to be the main ones who hate diversity in Western cartoons (particularly black people and muscular women). |
Jan 1, 1:43 PM
#132
Reply to thewiru
@LuxuriousHeart
Both are the same thing: One side wants the thing/group they like integrated into mainstream stuff, the other side says this isn't necessary because "If you want to see that thing/group so much, you can go to a place segregated from the mainstream which is 100% focused on that thing/group", not noticing that it misses the point (To have it integrated into the mainstream).
Analogy
Cognitive process of transferring information or meaning from a particular subject to another From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Analogy (disambiguation).
Analogy is a comparison or correspondence between two things (or two groups of things) because of a third element that they are considered to share.
In logic, it is an inference or an argument from one particular to another particular, as opposed to deduction, induction, and abduction. It is also used of where at least one of the premises, or the conclusion, is general rather than particular in nature. It has the general form A is to B as C is to D.
In a broader sense, analogical reasoning is a cognitive process of transferring some information or meaning of a particular subject (the analog, or source) onto another (the target); and also the linguistic expression corresponding to such a process. The term analogy can also refer to the relation between the source and the target themselves, which is often (though not always) a similarity, as in the biological notion of analogy.
Ernest Rutherford's model of the atom (modified by Niels Bohr) made an analogy between the atom and the Solar System.
Analogy plays a significant role in human thought processes. It has been argued that analogy lies at "the core of cognition".
Cognitive process of transferring information or meaning from a particular subject to another From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
For other uses, see Analogy (disambiguation).
Analogy is a comparison or correspondence between two things (or two groups of things) because of a third element that they are considered to share.
In logic, it is an inference or an argument from one particular to another particular, as opposed to deduction, induction, and abduction. It is also used of where at least one of the premises, or the conclusion, is general rather than particular in nature. It has the general form A is to B as C is to D.
In a broader sense, analogical reasoning is a cognitive process of transferring some information or meaning of a particular subject (the analog, or source) onto another (the target); and also the linguistic expression corresponding to such a process. The term analogy can also refer to the relation between the source and the target themselves, which is often (though not always) a similarity, as in the biological notion of analogy.
Ernest Rutherford's model of the atom (modified by Niels Bohr) made an analogy between the atom and the Solar System.
Analogy plays a significant role in human thought processes. It has been argued that analogy lies at "the core of cognition".
Both are the same thing: One side wants the thing/group they like integrated into mainstream stuff, the other side says this isn't necessary because "If you want to see that thing/group so much, you can go to a place segregated from the mainstream which is 100% focused on that thing/group", not noticing that it misses the point (To have it integrated into the mainstream).
@thewiru Ironically, anime fans argue this for black people... Y'all are the ones calling anything with a black person "woke". And the comparison makes no sense, because there's not subgenre of anime with mostly darker skinned people. So not only do y'all have your own subgenres, but there's fanservice and perverted jokes in mainstream series. So y'all are getting what you want, while having a dedicated space. This isn't the case with black characters. |
Jan 1, 1:47 PM
#133
Reply to kutuya
LuxuriousHeart said:
Doesn't a subsect of the anime community fetishize trans people? Aren't traps a thing?
Doesn't a subsect of the anime community fetishize trans people? Aren't traps a thing?
@LuxuriousHeart There's traps and otoko no ko/femboy (男の娘) (men who dress/look effeminate), shemale and futanari (women with male genitalia), and of course the elusive "cuntboy" (men with female genitalia), none of which are the same as tranoids, although I will concede shemales and cuntboys come pretty close, although they are almost nonexistent within non-R18 animanga.
The closest is TS (transexual)/genderbend, which is when someone is changed from one sex to the other (Ranma, Onimai)
Of course there are sometimes actual tranoids in animanga, but they are rare, it's not something I recall ever encountering, except maybe all the trannies (that's how it's been translated, I'm not familiar with the Japanese term) in Gintama.
LuxuriousHeart said:
Another reference to a black person... It's weird how y'all don't want black people in your shows or games, but y'all constantly mention us.
Another reference to a black person... It's weird how y'all don't want black people in your shows or games, but y'all constantly mention us.
Please take that back, Nutella71's wife's boyfriend is not defined by the tone of his skin or anything so arbitrary, he's every bit as human as the rest of us, maybe even an inch or two more.
@kutuya Trans people accept gender benders as acceptable representation. In a way, Akane is technically bi since she likes the male and female Ranma. And there have been explicit trans characters in manga before. Claudine is a good example of that. So trans rep has been in anime for a while. |
Jan 1, 1:51 PM
#134
Reply to DarkInsomnia57
It's worth pointing out that these are the same people programmed to watch western television. These people think the same jokes run into the ground back in the 80s is peak TV. Tourists have been brainwashed to think that entertainment must be clean first, entertaining last. They seem evangelical almost in their belief of clean undies walking by homeless screeching profanities and enormous wealth inequality.
They aren't moral, because that takes action. Rather they are judgmental about a philosophy they don't even believe in, so basically pilgrims.
They aren't moral, because that takes action. Rather they are judgmental about a philosophy they don't even believe in, so basically pilgrims.
@DarkInsomnia57 Western shows in the 80s were not clean. There was a bunch of homophobia, sexism, and racism. Even now, I wouldn't call them clean. A lot of shows with teens usually have that plot line of a teen girl dating/sleeping with an older guy. Teacher x student is a pretty popular trope in Western high school shows. |
Jan 1, 1:54 PM
#135
I think there are tourists in both sides of the chessboard (the conservative side and the progressive side). There are definitely people pushing for censorship of basic anime tropes but there are also people pushing for EVERYTHING to be NSFW (ecchi or gore) who are just as obnoxious. You know both sides are tourists because they only talk about the same 3 shows. It's like when people say "Go Woke Go Broke" with games ignoring the plethora of games that have been progressive and have been loved in the past. HELL, THEY EVEN FORGET THAT A WOKE GAME WON GOTY 2023. Both sides in this arguments are tourists. You can't change my mind. |
愛がなければ、見えない。 Without Love, the truth cannot be seen. |
Jan 1, 2:00 PM
#136
Reply to kutuya
@Nutella71 Tell us you do leave your wife's bedroom every time Tyrone comes over without telling us you do leave your wife's bedroom every time Tyrone comes over.
@kutuya I wish you insinuating I'm a cuck as a retort for not sharing your dehumanizing ragebait masked as coherent sentences views was nearly as funny as you think it is. |
Jan 1, 2:07 PM
#137
Reply to LuxuriousHeart
@thewiru Ironically, anime fans argue this for black people... Y'all are the ones calling anything with a black person "woke". And the comparison makes no sense, because there's not subgenre of anime with mostly darker skinned people. So not only do y'all have your own subgenres, but there's fanservice and perverted jokes in mainstream series. So y'all are getting what you want, while having a dedicated space. This isn't the case with black characters.
LuxuriousHeart said: Y'all are the ones calling anything with a black person "woke". Who the hell is "Y'all"? Stop assuming dumb stuff about me. LuxuriousHeart said: And the comparison makes no sense, because there's not subgenre of anime with mostly darker skinned people. Irrelevant, the argument is for the inclusion of ecchi scenes in non-ecchi focused anime. LuxuriousHeart said: but there's fanservice and perverted jokes in mainstream series We know. The argument is that it's becoming less over time and we want it to keep being there. LuxuriousHeart said: So y'all are getting what you want, while having a dedicated space. This isn't the case with black characters. ...how would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast today? No, seriously, you don't seem to understand hypotheticals or analogy. |
Jan 1, 2:10 PM
#138
Reply to GokaiKing
I think there are tourists in both sides of the chessboard (the conservative side and the progressive side). There are definitely people pushing for censorship of basic anime tropes but there are also people pushing for EVERYTHING to be NSFW (ecchi or gore) who are just as obnoxious. You know both sides are tourists because they only talk about the same 3 shows. It's like when people say "Go Woke Go Broke" with games ignoring the plethora of games that have been progressive and have been loved in the past. HELL, THEY EVEN FORGET THAT A WOKE GAME WON GOTY 2023.
Both sides in this arguments are tourists. You can't change my mind.
Both sides in this arguments are tourists. You can't change my mind.
GokaiKing said: I think there are tourists in both sides of the chessboard (the conservative side and the progressive side) That's not a hot take, everyone knows that, lol. |
Jan 1, 2:20 PM
#139
Reply to LuxuriousHeart
@Tropisch Y'all are the main ones calling people tourist and normies, and y'all seem to be the main ones who hate diversity in Western cartoons (particularly black people and muscular women).
@LuxuriousHeart Nice projection and generalization idiot. Fuck off. |
"Well, she's flatter than a pancake" -Mimi Alpacas |
Jan 1, 3:18 PM
#140
Reply to thewiru
@ryzxgum
Really? I found it quite weak.
Stop interpreting it so "literally".
Yes, it's about familiarity with otaku oriented media as a whole.
That otaku oriented media is only a part of Japanese culture is of no importance, people area aware (Or at least should be, since it isn't exactly hidden) that otaku culture is a sub-culture.
...we know, normies exist everywhere.
As I've said, otaku culture is a sub-culture.
Irrelevant, it's one of the most sold LN series.
As fair as it is concerned, that the closest to "universally beloved" you can get on otaku oriented media.
Once again, you're taking the term too literally.
If a person said that a theater play was bad by cinema metrics, we would say that person is silly.
The same applies here: In order to fully and fairly judge anime, one must understand it's language, conventions and what it is trying to do, and usually the best way to do that is by watching a lot of anime.
Well, I don't.
Quite the opposite, in fact.
Really? I found it quite weak.
PeripheralVision said:
I think "tourist" is a dumb term, all things considered. It relies on the idea that one must be familiar with Japanese media culture to be able to properly critique works, but there are two issues with this.
Firstly, Japanese media culture is only a small aspect of Japanese culture.
I think "tourist" is a dumb term, all things considered. It relies on the idea that one must be familiar with Japanese media culture to be able to properly critique works, but there are two issues with this.
Firstly, Japanese media culture is only a small aspect of Japanese culture.
Stop interpreting it so "literally".
Yes, it's about familiarity with otaku oriented media as a whole.
That otaku oriented media is only a part of Japanese culture is of no importance, people area aware (Or at least should be, since it isn't exactly hidden) that otaku culture is a sub-culture.
PeripheralVision said:
There are many Japanese folks who do not like many of the anime some fans dislike for similar reasons. "That weird anime shit" here is often "that weird anime shit" in Japan as well.
There are many Japanese folks who do not like many of the anime some fans dislike for similar reasons. "That weird anime shit" here is often "that weird anime shit" in Japan as well.
...we know, normies exist everywhere.
As I've said, otaku culture is a sub-culture.
PeripheralVision said:
Believe it or not, Mushoku Tensei is not a universally beloved property among domestic audiences, or is Uzamaid. It makes the tacit assumption that the Japanese love all anime like Mushoku Tensei as if they were a monolith whose opinion on anime is simply "Japanese=Good".
Believe it or not, Mushoku Tensei is not a universally beloved property among domestic audiences, or is Uzamaid. It makes the tacit assumption that the Japanese love all anime like Mushoku Tensei as if they were a monolith whose opinion on anime is simply "Japanese=Good".
Irrelevant, it's one of the most sold LN series.
As fair as it is concerned, that the closest to "universally beloved" you can get on otaku oriented media.
PeripheralVision said:
This makes me angry because people are basically saying that every Japanese person likes even the weirdest and arguably "most depraved" shit in anime and manga, which is a disservice to the people they are purportedly defending. "So you do not like X anime? You must be a tourist", as if actual Japanese folks by contrast love X anime. I actually like some weirder and arguably depraved work, but I am not going to defend it by claiming its detractors are not Japanese or well-acquainted with Japanese culture.
This makes me angry because people are basically saying that every Japanese person likes even the weirdest and arguably "most depraved" shit in anime and manga, which is a disservice to the people they are purportedly defending. "So you do not like X anime? You must be a tourist", as if actual Japanese folks by contrast love X anime. I actually like some weirder and arguably depraved work, but I am not going to defend it by claiming its detractors are not Japanese or well-acquainted with Japanese culture.
Once again, you're taking the term too literally.
PeripheralVision said:
Secondy, it assumes you need to watch anime to know what is "good storytelling to you", but I think this is wrong. Of course things should be understood in the original context of their culture, but that does not invalidate criticisms, if criticisms could even be valid or invalid in the first place. What is "good" does not change with culture, even if the contexts of certain scenes does. For example, Oldboy (2003) is a great movie, and though a fuller appreciation does require some understanding of Korean culture, perfect knowledge of Korean customs is not needed to simply watch it and say it is a masterclass in film-making. Good stories are more or less 'universal" in the same way music is. You cannot simply hit a bunch of keys on a piano and expect good music. There is logic in taste, and this extends to storytelling.
Secondy, it assumes you need to watch anime to know what is "good storytelling to you", but I think this is wrong. Of course things should be understood in the original context of their culture, but that does not invalidate criticisms, if criticisms could even be valid or invalid in the first place. What is "good" does not change with culture, even if the contexts of certain scenes does. For example, Oldboy (2003) is a great movie, and though a fuller appreciation does require some understanding of Korean culture, perfect knowledge of Korean customs is not needed to simply watch it and say it is a masterclass in film-making. Good stories are more or less 'universal" in the same way music is. You cannot simply hit a bunch of keys on a piano and expect good music. There is logic in taste, and this extends to storytelling.
If a person said that a theater play was bad by cinema metrics, we would say that person is silly.
The same applies here: In order to fully and fairly judge anime, one must understand it's language, conventions and what it is trying to do, and usually the best way to do that is by watching a lot of anime.
PeripheralVision said:
People who resort to this sort of gatekeeping are the same sort of people who watch Critical Drinker.
People who resort to this sort of gatekeeping are the same sort of people who watch Critical Drinker.
Well, I don't.
Quite the opposite, in fact.
@thewiru then the proper etiquette now would be to say something just as worthwhile as he did, which from my third scroll through, no one else has been doing. it's apparent that there's no use for me to come back to this thread a fourth time. |
Jan 1, 3:24 PM
#141
The trouble starts when you try to define "old". |
William Hughes Complex systems exhibit unexpected behaviour |
Jan 1, 3:51 PM
#142
Reply to thewiru
LuxuriousHeart said:
Y'all are the ones calling anything with a black person "woke".
Y'all are the ones calling anything with a black person "woke".
Who the hell is "Y'all"? Stop assuming dumb stuff about me.
LuxuriousHeart said:
And the comparison makes no sense, because there's not subgenre of anime with mostly darker skinned people.
And the comparison makes no sense, because there's not subgenre of anime with mostly darker skinned people.
Irrelevant, the argument is for the inclusion of ecchi scenes in non-ecchi focused anime.
LuxuriousHeart said:
but there's fanservice and perverted jokes in mainstream series
but there's fanservice and perverted jokes in mainstream series
We know.
The argument is that it's becoming less over time and we want it to keep being there.
LuxuriousHeart said:
So y'all are getting what you want, while having a dedicated space. This isn't the case with black characters.
So y'all are getting what you want, while having a dedicated space. This isn't the case with black characters.
...how would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast today?
No, seriously, you don't seem to understand hypotheticals or analogy.
@thewiru But the comparison makes no sense. dark skinned people don't have a subgenre in anime/manga, nor are they regularly in mainstream series. It seems you have an obsession with us (black people, or I guess dark skinned people in this case), and just wanted to bring us up. |
Jan 1, 3:52 PM
#143
Reply to Tropisch
@LuxuriousHeart Nice projection and generalization idiot. Fuck off.
@Tropisch I mean, your side is the one saying "go woke, go broke" whenever a black person so much as makes a 2 second cameo in something. Same with a tough girl boss being in any Western movie or game. |
Jan 1, 4:05 PM
#144
Reply to LuxuriousHeart
@Tropisch Y'all are the main ones calling people tourist and normies, and y'all seem to be the main ones who hate diversity in Western cartoons (particularly black people and muscular women).
@LuxuriousHeart There's a difference between diversity and "diversity". Diversity is done with sense, respect and in a way that fits the setting. What the West is doing today is not diversity, but tokenism. Characters only matter because race, sex or sexuality, and not because they're well developed. It's ironic that folks who clamor the most for alleged "diversity" also shudder when even one traditionally pretty woman is present. |
Hot Blood saves lives. |
Jan 1, 4:10 PM
#145
Why would anyone hate anime tourists? Why would anyone hate their primary source of revenues/profits? |
Here is my Pixiv account of my hentai drawings..... https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/104739065 Here is my blog.... https://theendofindustrialcivilization.blogspot.com/?m=1 |
Jan 1, 4:14 PM
#146
Reply to inklingboi08
@WaterMage I mean, it's completely normal for people to take offense to the objectification and sexualization of underaged women. That's not a Japanese or western ideal. It's not woke to think that ecchi is weird. I think ecchi is weird. I recognize the culture of the art, but I'm also intelligent enough to know that Japanese people think that shit is weird too. It's not disrespectful to Japanese culture to think ecchi or lolis are weird.
@inklingboi08 >hnyurrr drawings are real people Can't you people split fiction from reality? Reality is reality, fiction is fiction. Fictional worlds are constructed and they don't have to abide real world rules. Stop being outraged at random things on the internet and touch grass. You can decide what you will consume. You can't decide what others must consume. |
Hot Blood saves lives. |
Jan 1, 4:15 PM
#147
As an 'anime veteran,' I couldn't care less about this gatekeeping debate. People should be free to enjoy anime in whatever way works for them. The community is big enough for all types of fans. |
Jan 1, 4:18 PM
#148
Reply to TheMechaManiac
@inklingboi08
>hnyurrr drawings are real people
Can't you people split fiction from reality? Reality is reality, fiction is fiction. Fictional worlds are constructed and they don't have to abide real world rules.
Stop being outraged at random things on the internet and touch grass. You can decide what you will consume. You can't decide what others must consume.
>hnyurrr drawings are real people
Can't you people split fiction from reality? Reality is reality, fiction is fiction. Fictional worlds are constructed and they don't have to abide real world rules.
Stop being outraged at random things on the internet and touch grass. You can decide what you will consume. You can't decide what others must consume.
@TheMechaManiac I'm not deciding what others MUST consume, nor am I outraged at anything on the internet. I simply believe that the oversexualization of UNDERAGED characters or people, male or female, fictional or otherwise, is wrong. You can choose to believe that or not. |
If you're hungry, eat! |
Jan 1, 4:18 PM
#149
Reply to LuxuriousHeart
@thewiru But the comparison makes no sense. dark skinned people don't have a subgenre in anime/manga, nor are they regularly in mainstream series. It seems you have an obsession with us (black people, or I guess dark skinned people in this case), and just wanted to bring us up.
LuxuriousHeart said: dark skinned people don't have a subgenre in anime/manga, nor are they regularly in mainstream series. Yes, that's why it's an >>>ANALOGY<<<. What part of "The argument that 'representation doesn't matters because you have a segregated place you can see a thing/members of a group' is bad" did you not understand? LuxuriousHeart said: It seems you have an obsession with us (black people, or I guess dark skinned people in this case), and just wanted to bring us up. By USA's one-drop-rule and racial classifications, I'm technically afro-latinx. |
Jan 1, 4:21 PM
#150
Reply to inklingboi08
@TheMechaManiac I'm not deciding what others MUST consume, nor am I outraged at anything on the internet. I simply believe that the oversexualization of UNDERAGED characters or people, male or female, fictional or otherwise, is wrong. You can choose to believe that or not.
inklingboi08 said: I simply believe that the oversexualization of UNDERAGED characters or people, male or female, fictional or otherwise, is wrong. ...why would it be wrong, though? ............... |
More topics from this board
» The Anime Tourist ProblemZeroMajor12 - Sep 19 |
28 |
by SgtBateMan
»»
2 minutes ago |
|
» Is there an antagonism against the sheer concept of "anime"?thewiru - 4 hours ago |
9 |
by alshu
»»
5 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » Will the new Chainsaw Man movie make more money than the new Demon Slayer movie?Old_School_Akira - 10 hours ago |
16 |
by ryan77999
»»
11 minutes ago |
|
» 🍀 Anime Spring 2025 Male & Female Characters Tournament ( 1 2 3 )ISeeLifePeople - Sep 7 |
100 |
by Adnash
»»
12 minutes ago |
|
» Characters you want to be like and who are like youRobertBobert - 5 hours ago |
15 |
by Kruszer
»»
18 minutes ago |