Fairy Tail
Available on Manga Store
New
This topic has been locked and is no longer available for discussion.
Apr 6, 2014 6:00 AM
#51
This is probably one of the most hated anime on MAL. So it being #10 in the top anime is an accomplishment. And it being #10 after the first episode was out is amazing. Good job to the creators of Fairy tail. |
Raise it up, raise up the happiness. |
Apr 6, 2014 6:03 AM
#52
ShiroMizu said: The episode wasn't even good... And the Opening, it was quite decent. The opening was quite different and I loved it! A step up from Fairy tail - Fairy tail (2014). |
Raise it up, raise up the happiness. |
Apr 6, 2014 6:16 AM
#53
If we are going to talk about anime being rated to high we should mention the 4 Gintama shows that are incredibly overrated in the top 10. |
Apr 6, 2014 6:20 AM
#54
Most people who hate fairytail don't bother watching it (like me)......i bet only your heardcore fans are rating it right now .... hope it goes down.....if it doesn't ... then i don't trust MAL ratings anymore.. |
Apr 6, 2014 6:24 AM
#55
alexwer123 said: If we are going to talk about anime being rated to high we should mention the 4 Gintama shows that are incredibly overrated in the top 10. It's three shows and a movie, and they're not like Fairy Tail, you can start watching the second or third series anytime because most eps are standalone. |
Apr 6, 2014 6:30 AM
#56
gino_san said: Most people who hate fairytail don't bother watching it (like me)......i bet only your heardcore fans are rating it right now .... hope it goes down.....if it doesn't ... then i don't trust MAL ratings anymore.. I never trusted them to begin with... But it's always fun to see other people get mad. Who would go out of their way to post hateful comments about shows they don't even watch in their respective forums. |
Apr 6, 2014 6:35 AM
#57
Why does people care about ratings so much? Does it really hurt to see the anime you dislike get a good rating from fans? Are you people that much of a sore loser? I remember some SNK haters created double accounts just to rate the series 1 and lower the rankings..............classic example of losers right there. Fans are free to rate it. Is ratings on MAL becoming Politics like situation where one party is angry that the opposing party got too much votes? Where did the spirit of enjoying anime ran off to? |
Apr 6, 2014 6:38 AM
#58
Dragon_Slayer_X said: What else matters in this world? Only numbers.Why does people care about ratings so much? Dragon_Slayer_X said: Does it really hurt to see the anime you dislike get a good rating from fans? Are you people that much of a sore loser? Yes. Welcome to MAL. Dragon_Slayer_X said: Implying we don't watch anime in order to assess the state of Japan's culture.Where did the spirit of enjoying anime ran off to? |
Apr 6, 2014 6:44 AM
#59
Ckan said: Dragon_Slayer_X said: Implying we don't watch anime in order to assess the state of Japan's culture.Where did the spirit of enjoying anime ran off to? The thing is i have actually come to like some aspects of their culture. Now-a-days anime discussion, especially on online forums feel like political debates. Except for a few people, it's hard to discuss anime without bashing each other. That's why i liked GBF threads, no bashing or flame wars, only pure enjoyment and discussions. |
Apr 6, 2014 7:38 AM
#61
D0FLAMINGO said: How did this surpass Hunter x Hunter 2011? Because it's the sequel of a long series and just one episode aired. |
Apr 6, 2014 8:19 AM
#62
Dragon_Slayer_X said: Where did the spirit of enjoying anime ran off to? We enjoy anime by hating. It is fun, you should try it. And debates are fun as well. They also don't affect you at all, what people do with their lives is none of your concern. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Apr 6, 2014 8:30 AM
#63
_ultima_ said: Dragon_Slayer_X said: Where did the spirit of enjoying anime ran off to? We enjoy anime by hating. It is fun, you should try it. And debates are fun as well. They also don't affect you at all, what people do with their lives is none of your concern. You are not living your life correctly. |
Apr 6, 2014 8:32 AM
#64
Dragon_Slayer_X said: Ckan said: Dragon_Slayer_X said: Implying we don't watch anime in order to assess the state of Japan's culture.Where did the spirit of enjoying anime ran off to? The thing is i have actually come to like some aspects of their culture. Now-a-days anime discussion, especially on online forums feel like political debates. Except for a few people, it's hard to discuss anime without bashing each other. That's why i liked GBF threads, no bashing or flame wars, only pure enjoyment and discussions. You have strayed from the Way. One does not enjoy culture, one becomes it. You must be one with anime. |
Apr 6, 2014 8:33 AM
#65
_ultima_ said: Dragon_Slayer_X said: Where did the spirit of enjoying anime ran off to? We enjoy anime by hating. It is fun, you should try it. And debates are fun as well. They also don't affect you at all, what people do with their lives is none of your concern. Sorry my definition of fun doesn't come from hating and trolling and your type of people is they type i DESPISE the most. Proper debates are fun, not the type you people do........ |
Apr 6, 2014 8:37 AM
#66
Dragon_Slayer_X said: Ckan said: Dragon_Slayer_X said: Implying we don't watch anime in order to assess the state of Japan's culture.Where did the spirit of enjoying anime ran off to? The thing is i have actually come to like some aspects of their culture. Now-a-days anime discussion, especially on online forums feel like political debates. Except for a few people, it's hard to discuss anime without bashing each other. That's why i liked GBF threads, no bashing or flame wars, only pure enjoyment and discussions. Its pretty much useless mate. Some people just don't like the idea of other anime surpassing their favorite ones. Even though I like FT more than OP I'd watch both of them even though OP takes the 1st rank. Some people seem to care about ranks more I suppose. |
Apr 6, 2014 8:43 AM
#67
Shuhan said: _ultima_ said: Dragon_Slayer_X said: Where did the spirit of enjoying anime ran off to? We enjoy anime by hating. It is fun, you should try it. And debates are fun as well. They also don't affect you at all, what people do with their lives is none of your concern. You are not living your life correctly. You are on anime site replying to comments. You are not living your life correctly. There is no "correct" way to live. I just follow foppery and whim. Dragon_Slayer_X said: Proper debates are fun, not the type you people do........ Troll debates can fun too. Maybe, you shouldn't be so serious all the time? |
ChangeItSelfApr 6, 2014 8:52 AM
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Apr 6, 2014 8:43 AM
#68
And why is a shitty anime like Gintama on top? Exactly the same! Gintama doesn't deserve to score higher than Digimon IMO -.- This anime however, deserves rank 10 for the masterpiece it is. |
Apr 6, 2014 8:45 AM
#69
Animaker said: And why is a shitty anime like Gintama on top? Exactly the same! Gintama doesn't deserve to score higher than Digimon IMO -.- keyword in that sentence is "IMO" clearly other people have a differing opinion |
Apr 6, 2014 8:52 AM
#70
I don't deny that, each and everyone has their oppinion. Hating other's opinions is like denying their existence, it's just wrong! Everybody has their taste in anime, if some anime you dislike is rated better than the one you love deal with it! I don't expect people to watch anime in the same perspective I do. I am special, and so is everybody. The thing is having different tastes isn't being brought up as being special but as being taboo on these forums. This is why I have so few posts on these forums, I can sense a stupidity level from far away. |
Apr 6, 2014 9:03 AM
#71
Animaker said: You haven't even watched Gintama.And why is a shitty anime like Gintama on top? Exactly the same! Gintama doesn't deserve to score higher than Digimon IMO -.- This anime however, deserves rank 10 for the masterpiece it is. |
Short of the day: Monotonous Purgatory(MAL) ✰Public Domain Club | One Piece Club✰ |
Apr 6, 2014 9:18 AM
#72
I did, after some episodes I gave up, so I even removed it from my animelist. |
Apr 6, 2014 9:26 AM
#73
Animaker said: I don't deny that, each and everyone has their oppinion. Hating other's opinions is like denying their existence, it's just wrong! Everybody has their taste in anime, if some anime you dislike is rated better than the one you love deal with it! I don't expect people to watch anime in the same perspective I do. I am special, and so is everybody. The thing is having different tastes isn't being brought up as being special but as being taboo on these forums. This is why I have so few posts on these forums, I can sense a stupidity level from far away. this post. this post is good |
Apr 6, 2014 9:33 AM
#74
the one long anime that is taking me forever to finish is inuyasha o.o |
|
Apr 6, 2014 9:44 AM
#75
Animaker said: So you never watched all of it. And how much is "some"?I did, after some episodes I gave up, so I even removed it from my animelist. |
Short of the day: Monotonous Purgatory(MAL) ✰Public Domain Club | One Piece Club✰ |
Apr 6, 2014 9:53 AM
#76
not surprising mal is full of type b otaku who gave SAO and SNK 10/10. most of them don't have a real criteria of scoring and will give shows 10/10's and 1/10's long before a show is even finished. I also think a lot of it has to do with the fact that anyone with good taste or intelligence would've dropped the series a long time ago so now with only the most hardcore fairy tards left of corse they're already giving it stellar ratings. |
Apr 6, 2014 10:11 AM
#77
I get that FT is very popular but it just feels so weird to see it in the top 10. Now granted I'm not much of a gintama fan, but FMAB, Clannad, Geass, LOtGH, etc are all such legendary anime it just seems so difficult to put something like FT in there especially when the show hasn't even concluded yet and is a long running show that's gonna have crappy fillers. It's a mainstream shonen, fine. But still, it just feels so freaking weird seeing it there, I agree that this ranking system is really crappy, probably just take it with a grain of salt. |
Apr 6, 2014 10:15 AM
#78
amehmood16 said: They're not exactly ancient classics, you know. Otherwise, well said.Now granted I'm not much of a gintama fan, but FMAB, Clannad, Geass, etc are all such legendary anime.... this ranking system is really crappy, probably just take it with a grain of salt. |
Apr 6, 2014 10:23 AM
#79
amehmood16 said: I agree that this ranking system is really crappy, probably just take it with a grain of salt. What's so crappy about the ranking system? The ranking system did nothing wrong. |
Apr 6, 2014 10:28 AM
#80
IntroverTurtle said: Animaker said: So you never watched all of it. And how much is "some"?I did, after some episodes I gave up, so I even removed it from my animelist. 7 episodes, couldn't handle more of it. Well, in my opinion Fairy Tail and One Piece both should be at the top 15 at least! They are legendary anime also. And One Piece is legend of the legends, true masterpiece in my perspective, top 1 for me :D |
AnimakerApr 6, 2014 10:31 AM
Apr 6, 2014 10:31 AM
#81
Animaker said: IntroverTurtle said: Animaker said: So you never watched all of it. And how much is "some"?I did, after some episodes I gave up, so I even removed it from my animelist. 7 episodes, couldn't handle more of it. Well, it's crap until the episode 20, then it got decent and after a while it gets good. But yeah, the beginning it's very bad. |
Apr 6, 2014 10:33 AM
#82
Only anime I tolerated a crappy beginning and the saw it get decent and good was Katekyou Hitman Reborn. That first episode got me all confused(I was 14 at the time) but after continuing I saw it was actually pretty good and the confusion was gone. |
Apr 6, 2014 10:36 AM
#83
Animaker said: There was a lot more 'crappy' to tolerate than just a 'beginning', but opinions.Only anime I tolerated a crappy beginning and the saw it get decent and good was Katekyou Hitman Reborn. That first episode got me all confused(I was 14 at the time) but after continuing I saw it was actually pretty good and the confusion was gone. |
Apr 6, 2014 10:40 AM
#84
wanderingplayboy said: amehmood16 said: I agree that this ranking system is really crappy, probably just take it with a grain of salt. What's so crappy about the ranking system? The ranking system did nothing wrong. Well someone already pointed it out several times but just the fact that a show with only 20k viewers and a rating of 8.94 which imo is severely flawed for a couple reasons, the first being noobs who insta-rate a show after one freaking episode (I absolutely hate that) and second this is gonna be a long running show that's most likely going to have some filler arcs that are not worth the rating but it's the fanbase keeping the rating up there. It's not unbiased/impartial whatsoever. I bet you anything had they never announced this second rendition of FT the original FT ranking would not have changed at all. Besides, as I pointed out it just feels so goddamn weird. A 20k show with a biased 8.94 rating beating well-known greats like Spirited Away which was 200k viewers but an 8.91 rating, or TTGL with 250k viewers but 8.84 rating, or Bebop for god's sake with 220k viewers and an 8.83 rating,, Mushishi, F/Z. GTO, the list goes on.... The point is those anime are all very well established with an arkfull of viewers who've given it, maybe not the most unbiased score, but a score that is much much more unbiased than what FT (2014) has. Gintama is the only outlier there since it has hardly any viewers compared to others in the top 10, but that's probably for the same reasons as FT. If it became more mainstream I'm sure the rating would go down just because more people would be watching it. Now after making it through all this convoluted shit I've written down, the take home message would be fuck rankings. |
Apr 6, 2014 10:49 AM
#85
Well I could say you have questionable taste for saying FT is a masterpiece, but your opinion is your opinion. Although if I was a betting man I'd say you would be in the minority lol |
Apr 6, 2014 11:05 AM
#86
amehmood16 said: wanderingplayboy said: amehmood16 said: I agree that this ranking system is really crappy, probably just take it with a grain of salt. What's so crappy about the ranking system? The ranking system did nothing wrong. Well someone already pointed it out several times but just the fact that a show with only 20k viewers and a rating of 8.94 which imo is severely flawed for a couple reasons, the first being noobs who insta-rate a show after one freaking episode (I absolutely hate that) and second this is gonna be a long running show that's most likely going to have some filler arcs that are not worth the rating but it's the fanbase keeping the rating up there. It's not unbiased/impartial whatsoever. I bet you anything had they never announced this second rendition of FT the original FT ranking would not have changed at all. Besides, as I pointed out it just feels so goddamn weird. A 20k show with a biased 8.94 rating beating well-known greats like Spirited Away which was 200k viewers but an 8.91 rating, or TTGL with 250k viewers but 8.84 rating, or Bebop for god's sake with 220k viewers and an 8.83 rating,, Mushishi, F/Z. GTO, the list goes on.... The point is those anime are all very well established with an arkfull of viewers who've given it, maybe not the most unbiased score, but a score that is much much more unbiased than what FT (2014) has. Gintama is the only outlier there since it has hardly any viewers compared to others in the top 10, but that's probably for the same reasons as FT. If it became more mainstream I'm sure the rating would go down just because more people would be watching it. Now after making it through all this convoluted shit I've written down, the take home message would be fuck rankings. yup this is true I started watching Gintama because of the high rating it has but then realized only a small handful of people have actually seen it so its very misleading and I dont think the show is all that at all Mod Edit: Removed quote of deleted post. |
NiyawaJun 10, 2014 11:37 AM
![]() |
Apr 6, 2014 11:22 AM
#87
amehmood16 said: yup this is truewanderingplayboy said: amehmood16 said: I agree that this ranking system is really crappy, probably just take it with a grain of salt. What's so crappy about the ranking system? The ranking system did nothing wrong. Well someone already pointed it out several times but just the fact that a show with only 20k viewers and a rating of 8.94 which imo is severely flawed for a couple reasons, the first being noobs who insta-rate a show after one freaking episode (I absolutely hate that) and second this is gonna be a long running show that's most likely going to have some filler arcs that are not worth the rating but it's the fanbase keeping the rating up there. It's not unbiased/impartial whatsoever. I bet you anything had they never announced this second rendition of FT the original FT ranking would not have changed at all. Besides, as I pointed out it just feels so goddamn weird. A 20k show with a biased 8.94 rating beating well-known greats like Spirited Away which was 200k viewers but an 8.91 rating, or TTGL with 250k viewers but 8.84 rating, or Bebop for god's sake with 220k viewers and an 8.83 rating,, Mushishi, F/Z. GTO, the list goes on.... The point is those anime are all very well established with an arkfull of viewers who've given it, maybe not the most unbiased score, but a score that is much much more unbiased than what FT (2014) has. Gintama is the only outlier there since it has hardly any viewers compared to others in the top 10, but that's probably for the same reasons as FT. If it became more mainstream I'm sure the rating would go down just because more people would be watching it. Now after making it through all this convoluted shit I've written down, the take home message would be fuck rankings. I started watching Gintama because of the high rating it has but then realized only a small handful of people have actually seen it so its very misleading and I dont think the show is all that at all[/quote] Gintama is....honestly the best way to describe it is an 'acquired taste.' not everyone likes it and it usually takes quite a while until you start liking it 9for me it was 40 episodes). About the FT rating, it's obvious that the score for 2014 isn't going to stay where it is. It'll probably drop to the top 30 and stay around there and I'm fine with that. FT is pretty shitty story and writing wise, but it's a fun series. Mod Edit: Removed quote of deleted post. |
NiyawaJun 10, 2014 11:38 AM
Apr 6, 2014 11:32 AM
#88
amehmood16 said: The first thing you mentioned is the users, not the rating system. And filler =/= bad, you don't have any point with your second reason. Of course fans of an anime will rate that anime higher. And no one rates unbiased. Has the original FT rating changed? I thought we were talking about the sequel's score. wanderingplayboy said: amehmood16 said: I agree that this ranking system is really crappy, probably just take it with a grain of salt. What's so crappy about the ranking system? The ranking system did nothing wrong. Well someone already pointed it out several times but just the fact that a show with only 20k viewers and a rating of 8.94 which imo is severely flawed for a couple reasons, the first being noobs who insta-rate a show after one freaking episode (I absolutely hate that) and second this is gonna be a long running show that's most likely going to have some filler arcs that are not worth the rating but it's the fanbase keeping the rating up there. It's not unbiased/impartial whatsoever. I bet you anything had they never announced this second rendition of FT the original FT ranking would not have changed at all. Besides, as I pointed out it just feels so goddamn weird. A 20k show with a biased 8.94 rating beating well-known greats like Spirited Away which was 200k viewers but an 8.91 rating, or TTGL with 250k viewers but 8.84 rating, or Bebop for god's sake with 220k viewers and an 8.83 rating,, Mushishi, F/Z. GTO, the list goes on.... The point is those anime are all very well established with an arkfull of viewers who've given it, maybe not the most unbiased score, but a score that is much much more unbiased than what FT (2014) has. Gintama is the only outlier there since it has hardly any viewers compared to others in the top 10, but that's probably for the same reasons as FT. If it became more mainstream I'm sure the rating would go down just because more people would be watching it. Now after making it through all this convoluted shit I've written down, the take home message would be fuck rankings. So you want popularity to count on the score. That's stupid as hell. So those anime that aren't crazy popular and have a dub won't be able to get anywhere near the top. Now that would be a crappy ranking system. And make that wall of text have some paragraphs. |
Short of the day: Monotonous Purgatory(MAL) ✰Public Domain Club | One Piece Club✰ |
Apr 6, 2014 11:54 AM
#89
It should at least trade places with JoJo. The first episode of that was already better than the next two arcs in Fairy Tail. That Sun Village arc is atrocious. Also I think that Reborn's start was worse than Gintama. I like KHR but man that start was especially painful. |
Apr 6, 2014 11:56 AM
#90
IntroverTurtle said: amehmood16 said: The first thing you mentioned is the users, not the rating system. And filler =/= bad, you don't have any point with your second reason. Of course fans of an anime will rate that anime higher. And no one rates unbiased. Has the original FT rating changed? I thought we were talking about the sequel's score. wanderingplayboy said: amehmood16 said: I agree that this ranking system is really crappy, probably just take it with a grain of salt. What's so crappy about the ranking system? The ranking system did nothing wrong. Well someone already pointed it out several times but just the fact that a show with only 20k viewers and a rating of 8.94 which imo is severely flawed for a couple reasons, the first being noobs who insta-rate a show after one freaking episode (I absolutely hate that) and second this is gonna be a long running show that's most likely going to have some filler arcs that are not worth the rating but it's the fanbase keeping the rating up there. It's not unbiased/impartial whatsoever. I bet you anything had they never announced this second rendition of FT the original FT ranking would not have changed at all. Besides, as I pointed out it just feels so goddamn weird. A 20k show with a biased 8.94 rating beating well-known greats like Spirited Away which was 200k viewers but an 8.91 rating, or TTGL with 250k viewers but 8.84 rating, or Bebop for god's sake with 220k viewers and an 8.83 rating,, Mushishi, F/Z. GTO, the list goes on.... The point is those anime are all very well established with an arkfull of viewers who've given it, maybe not the most unbiased score, but a score that is much much more unbiased than what FT (2014) has. Gintama is the only outlier there since it has hardly any viewers compared to others in the top 10, but that's probably for the same reasons as FT. If it became more mainstream I'm sure the rating would go down just because more people would be watching it. Now after making it through all this convoluted shit I've written down, the take home message would be fuck rankings. So you want popularity to count on the score. That's stupid as hell. So those anime that aren't crazy popular and have a dub won't be able to get anywhere near the top. Now that would be a crappy ranking system. And make that wall of text have some paragraphs. Sorry about that, I'll rectify that mistake in this reply. Well if you think about it the rating system it's fundamentally based on the users; it's the users that decide the rating. Users assign a score to an anime, and they choose to add it on their list as a viewer of the anime. Now I'm sure there's some algorithm that goes into the ranking system but it's heavily dependent on the users. Sure, you can say filler doesn't necessarily equate to bad, I guess I could also add the length of the anime though. Most people aren't going to sit through 100+ episode anime which could be a turnoff. As for no one rating unbiased, I addressed that in my wall of text ("The point is those anime are all very well established with an arkfull of viewers who've given it, maybe not the most unbiased score, but a score that is much much more unbiased than what FT (2014) has.") In FT (2014) case it's more biased because there are less viewers = less opinions. I'm pretty sure the original FT rating hasn't changed, but my point with that was if it hasn't changed then there's really no reason for FT (2014) to change since it's just a continuation of FT. But the fact that it's a separate show gives it a new ranking and a new set of criteria to be judged by, and like I've said millions of times already, the only people keeping FT (2014) at 10 are the hardcore fans giving it 9s and 10s because they're hardcore fans and felt the same way about FT. This does not include all the people who saw the first FT! I do want popularity to count simply because it makes the rating less biased. By popularity I mean the number of people who watch the anime. It's a simple concept. The more people who watch an anime, the more people who can contribute their opinion to it. With a variety of opinions, the anime itself becomes more well-rounded because it's not just one side dominating over the other (lovers trump haters, or vice versa. Sometimes this happens but not often.) You have a generalized stance on the value of the anime provided by people who love it, think it's good, think it's ok, think it's shit, etc. This allows you to form a better idea of what that anime means to you, which is still subjective, but it's not completely biased since you have taken into account the pros and cons. |
Apr 6, 2014 11:57 AM
#91
I have a question. I have never seen any previous JoJo, I thought it would be crappy, but that first episode was EPIC!!! I just want to know if I am watching a season 2 or 3 or if Im watching a season 1. I know there are previous animes, but maybe this one doesn't follow their stories. I know it's not much related to the thread, but please reply. |
Apr 6, 2014 11:59 AM
#92
Animaker said: I have a question. I have never seen any previous JoJo, I thought it would be crappy, but that first episode was EPIC!!! I just want to know if I am watching a season 2 or 3 or if Im watching a season 1. I know there are previous animes, but maybe this one doesn't follow their stories. I know it's not much related to the thread, but please reply. You're watching season 2. To get the complete story you should watch Jojo (2012). That adapts Arcs 1 and 2: Phantom Blood and Battle Tendency. The Jojo currently airing adapts the third arc, otherwise known as Stardust Crusaders. |
Apr 6, 2014 12:01 PM
#93
Boombawks said: ^^ When the rating drops, and you read haters hating, that is when you will hate the haters that are hating. Fairy Tail is only ranked high because it's fanboy army are all rating it insta' 10/10. Can you honestly say Fairy Tail is better than the animes it is ahead of? The animes that it is now amongst on the top end of the list? It defines the generic shounens out there, the people who like Fairy Tail obviously have low standards and poor tastes, they don't appreciate a good written story and are happy to be hand-fed whatever is put infront of their mouth. The main reason why it's popular is because of the fan service, the plot is almost non existent in the original Fairy Tail and that will not be changing anytime soon. A good quote from a reviewer. "Generally this whole thing can be summed up in 6 steps. Step 1: A strong enemy appears. MC's are beaten up by the enemy. Step 2: MC's yell about friendship and the power of nakamas. Step 3: They power up emotionally and physically by the power of friendship and random stuff. Step 4: MC's overpower the villain. Step 5: No training of any kind whatsoever. Step 6: New arc. Go to step 1." ^^ This is Fairy Tail, this is what a lot of people are happy with and has them to the edge of their seats for. Low standards, amused but little and irrelevant things. So true. Sometimes it feels like pokemon where the same thing happens over and over. I wont hate on the series. Will probably soon continue from where I left off. It's a decent series though. Not bad at all. |
Apr 6, 2014 12:01 PM
#94
You can ignore the other Jojo anime that have been made because Jojo (2012) acts a complete reboot of the franchise and continues from there into Stardust Crusaders. |
Apr 6, 2014 12:03 PM
#95
id be quite happy if all of jojo got adapted and then we'd see a shit ton of jojo in the top 10 |
Immahnoob said: Jizzy, I know you have no idea how to argue for shit, tokiyashiro said: Jizzy as you would call yourself because youre a dick The most butthurt award goes to you And clearly you havent watched that many shows thats why you cant determine if a show is unique or not Or maybe you're just a child who likes common stuffs where hero saves the day and guys gets all the girls. Sad taste you have there kid you came up to me in the first place making you look more like a kid who got slapped without me even knowing it and start crying about it to me |
Apr 6, 2014 12:14 PM
#96
JizzyHitler said: id be quite happy if all of jojo got adapted and then we'd see a shit ton of jojo in the top 10 It would be another gintama. Oh boy... |
Apr 6, 2014 12:15 PM
#97
amehmood16 said: JoJo gets a free pass because it's JoJo.You can ignore the other Jojo anime that have been made because Jojo (2012) acts a complete reboot of the franchise and continues from there into Stardust Crusaders. |
an egomaniac and a fool |
Apr 6, 2014 12:43 PM
#98
Don't get me wrong, I'm happy that FT (2014) is #10, but why do people rate it after one episode? You haven't seen it unfold, so you can't judge it yet. What I am not looking forward to is the hate that will come with something being overhyped. It's like impending doom for the series. |
Apr 6, 2014 12:43 PM
#99
Apr 6, 2014 12:52 PM
#100
keragamming said: Boombawks said: ^^ When the rating drops, and you read haters hating, that is when you will hate the haters that are hating. Fairy Tail is only ranked high because it's fanboy army are all rating it insta' 10/10. Can you honestly say Fairy Tail is better than the animes it is ahead of? The animes that it is now amongst on the top end of the list? It defines the generic shounens out there, the people who like Fairy Tail obviously have low standards and poor tastes, they don't appreciate a good written story and are happy to be hand-fed whatever is put infront of their mouth. The main reason why it's popular is because of the fan service, the plot is almost non existent in the original Fairy Tail and that will not be changing anytime soon. A good quote from a reviewer. "Generally this whole thing can be summed up in 6 steps. Step 1: A strong enemy appears. MC's are beaten up by the enemy. Step 2: MC's yell about friendship and the power of nakamas. Step 3: They power up emotionally and physically by the power of friendship and random stuff. Step 4: MC's overpower the villain. Step 5: No training of any kind whatsoever. Step 6: New arc. Go to step 1." ^^ This is Fairy Tail, this is what a lot of people are happy with and has them to the edge of their seats for. Low standards, amused but little and irrelevant things. So true. Sometimes it feels like pokemon where the same thing happens over and over. I wont hate on the series. Will probably soon continue from where I left off. It's a decent series though. Not bad at all. That might be true... to some extent at least. The NAKAMA power-up happens only in what? First couple of arcs? After that it's safe to assume that they're strong, been through a lot, and defeat their enemies without to much depending on NAKAMA power. But yea, it's called Fairy Tail, not Natsu. It's obvious that you're going to encounter a lot of teamwork and stuff like that. Also I came to believe that the show is soon going to end... The story is certainly narrowing down to Zeref and Acnologia. The rating system on MAL is kinda problematic... I wouldn't rate any show I've watched so far a 10, but giving a 10 to the shows you like makes it easier to organize your anime list. My honest score for the show would be 8.5, leaning more towards 8. The show doesn't keep me on edge. I consider it light show that you can watch while eating and not really pay much attention to the story. They manage to link several funny scenes as one to make you burst in laughter.. All this = my idea of FT hence 10. |
This topic has been locked and is no longer available for discussion.
More topics from this board
Poll: » Fairy Tail (2014) Episode 100 Discussion ( 1 2 3 )Stark700 - Mar 11, 2016 |
120 |
by Serhiyko
»»
Oct 5, 2:11 PM |
|
Poll: » Fairy Tail (2014) Episode 98 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Feb 26, 2016 |
55 |
by Serhiyko
»»
Oct 5, 7:54 AM |
|
Poll: » Fairy Tail (2014) Episode 91 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Jan 8, 2016 |
95 |
by Serhiyko
»»
Oct 1, 2:31 PM |
|
Poll: » Fairy Tail (2014) Episode 84 Discussion ( 1 2 )Stark700 - Nov 13, 2015 |
94 |
by Serhiyko
»»
Sep 22, 6:46 AM |
|
Poll: » Fairy Tail (2014) Episode 1 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Stark700 - Apr 4, 2014 |
370 |
by Fayyery
»»
Sep 20, 5:29 PM |