New
Oct 20, 2020 3:57 PM
#1
I just see this word gets thrown around by pricks who shit on popular anime and claim that they have better taste. What's the meaning of it? Give an example of an overrated anime. |
Oct 20, 2020 4:02 PM
#2
"Overrated" means the anime in question is currently receiving more praise than it deserves. The anime could still be good, but the person using the term "overrated" simply feels that it's not AS good as other people claim. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Oct 20, 2020 4:03 PM
#3
"I personally don't feel like it should be popular by my own personal metric" or "meh, I just don't see why it's so popular", the latter is fine, but with the first I'm trying to take things at face value but I also want to say that it's pretty selfish to place your own personal standards on a group of people who view things differently :/ |
ChartTopper60Oct 20, 2020 4:10 PM
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Oct 20, 2020 4:05 PM
#4
Whenever someone uses the word "overrated" - all it means is "lots of other people liked it, but I didn't." |
Oct 20, 2020 4:06 PM
#5
Who decided how much praise some anime should get? There is no such thing as overrated, word using by cry babies XD. Nobody even said some title have to be masterpieace to get a lot of praise, sometime hype train its enough like kimetsu no yaiba episode 19, and now they just breaking every records everywhere they can. |
Oct 20, 2020 4:07 PM
#6
@ChartTopper60 @wape I mean, I think the One Piece manga is pretty overrated, but I still consider it to be "good" overall. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Oct 20, 2020 4:09 PM
#7
It means the person using the word believes that the current rating (which represents the average of the people who scored it) is too high, essentially saying their opinion is more important than everyone else's. |
Oct 20, 2020 4:11 PM
#8
K_Rool_Addict said: @ChartTopper60 @wape I mean, I think the One Piece manga is pretty overrated, but I still consider it to be "good" overall. In my personal opinion it has a fair score and I'd put it down to maybe 8.71, but still a genuinely fine read. Still, it's nice to see that you have your own views on it |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Oct 20, 2020 4:16 PM
#9
K_Rool_Addict said: You're not wrong however that's part of the same overall value. Meaning that no matter what, I can't put myself into liking it on the same level as others.@ChartTopper60 @wape I mean, I think the One Piece manga is pretty overrated, but I still consider it to be "good" overall. |
Oct 20, 2020 4:17 PM
#10
This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. |
Oct 20, 2020 4:24 PM
#11
Adimus_prime said: This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. This is the most elitist thing I've ever read. |
Oct 20, 2020 4:27 PM
#12
Overrated is a term often used aimed towards franchises that are simply not good enough for the praise they receive. Their fandoms refuse to admit the very blatant flaws said franchises have. They often treat them as perfect, being toxic towards anyone who thinks otherwise, would try to compare their beloved shitty franchise with everything else and will often diss people for liking something else. For instance, the entire Demon Slayer hype - is it overrated? Yep. The series isn't good, the adaptation of Ufotable is however. People can't differentiate between a good story (which Demon Slayer isn't) to a very good adaptation where a studio carried a series to victory. Another example? Dragon Ball as a whole. The Dragon Ball fandom is filled with dumb, toxic people, who try to compare Goku to literally everything. Funny enough, Goku is one of the dumbest main characters to ever be created. He is badly written, and is as dumb as the people who adore him, so maybe in this case it has more to do with people being able to associate themselves with his idiocy. Same could be said about One Punch Man with Saitama's idiocy, the entire fanbase of "herp derp he is the strongest thing ever hahaha" even though they refuse to admit One's writing is subpar and he messes up way too much in the last couple of years. Very often, the simpler an anime is, the more likely it will become popular - people enjoy stuff that is easy to consume. They care about waifus over plot, they care about random fights and shouting instead of having a gradual buildup towards an emotinally invested fight, they care about big explosions and transformations over technique and planning. These are all fine, but when people start shoving everyone's face their thoughts about how their shit is the best thing ever, and masses of people try to do the same - that's exactly when something enters the overrated territory. |
Oct 20, 2020 4:27 PM
#13
Oct 20, 2020 4:37 PM
#14
"I don't like it, so I don't like the fact that it's popular and generally liked." Or: "I'm a hipster and call everything that is popular atm overrated." |
Oct 20, 2020 4:58 PM
#15
Hrybami said: How was what I said elitist in any, shape, or form?Adimus_prime said: This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. This is the most elitist thing I've ever read. |
Oct 20, 2020 5:09 PM
#16
Armados said: Overrated is a term often used aimed towards franchises that are simply not good enough for the praise they receive. Their fandoms refuse to admit the very blatant flaws said franchises have. They often treat them as perfect, being toxic towards anyone who thinks otherwise, would try to compare their beloved shitty franchise with everything else and will often diss people for liking something else. For instance, the entire Demon Slayer hype - is it overrated? Yep. The series isn't good, the adaptation of Ufotable is however. People can't differentiate between a good story (which Demon Slayer isn't) to a very good adaptation where a studio carried a series to victory. Another example? Dragon Ball as a whole. The Dragon Ball fandom is filled with dumb, toxic people, who try to compare Goku to literally everything. Funny enough, Goku is one of the dumbest main characters to ever be created. He is badly written, and is as dumb as the people who adore him, so maybe in this case it has more to do with people being able to associate themselves with his idiocy. Same could be said about One Punch Man with Saitama's idiocy, the entire fanbase of "herp derp he is the strongest thing ever hahaha" even though they refuse to admit One's writing is subpar and he messes up way too much in the last couple of years. Very often, the simpler an anime is, the more likely it will become popular - people enjoy stuff that is easy to consume. They care about waifus over plot, they care about random fights and shouting instead of having a gradual buildup towards an emotinally invested fight, they care about big explosions and transformations over technique and planning. These are all fine, but when people start shoving everyone's face their thoughts about how their shit is the best thing ever, and masses of people try to do the same - that's exactly when something enters the overrated territory. Man, there are quite a few things I don't agree with. First of all, the relevant part, the definition of overrated. The way you defined it as lets you appear as some absolute elitist, who thinks their opinion is the only one that matters. Your definition would incline that those, who call shows overrated, are absolutely and always right, because the fandom it is aimed towards is incapable of seeing their flaws. Just no, man. Calling a show "overrated" simple means that a show, or pretty much whatever one rates, has a higher rating than the rater thinks it should have based on whatever scale he uses. Now, to those other little points. You said that Kimetsu no Yaiba is overrated, not good, and only profited of ufotable. How exactly do you come to that conclusion? The only point of those three that is in some way measurable might be the third one, and even that is kinda tricky. Of course, ufotable did an amazing job with Kimetsu no Yaiba, nobody questions that. But we can't say whether the show would've had more success if say david production or KyoAni or Toei would've done the show. Simply because those numbers don't exist, and never really can. The only thing we can really measure would be how much the manga sells grew after the adaptation, but even that wouldn't give us too much to work with. And on Kimetsu no Yaibas qualitiy, how would you rate whether its good or not? You can compare it to your standards, and come to a conclusion whether it works for you or not, but thats about it. Same really with Goku and his character traits. He might not work for you, but he might as well work for a whole lot of other people. Don't get me wrong, I don't particulary like Dragon Ball or Goku, but still. From my perspective as aspiring writer I see an archetypical Paragon hero, unchanging in his attributes, but nonetheless enjoyable if one likes such a kind of character. Well, the last bit... I can't really say you are wrong, because what you described is exactly what happened in movies, and well, also in anime, because the simpler something is, the better you can market it. I mean, would you rather try to sell a simple pen, or a pen with invisible inc which is only readable under the full moon, integrated with voicerecorder, laser pointer and a nuclear warhead? |
Oct 20, 2020 5:12 PM
#17
Why do people overthink the meaning of the word? It's just a personal opinion of an individual of thinking that a certain work is given more value by everyone else than the one he/she believes it really deserves. It doesn't mean anything else. |
Oct 20, 2020 5:14 PM
#18
I find it hard to listen to people who use those kinda terms instead of just describing actual aspects of the anime. |
Oct 20, 2020 5:50 PM
#19
The most popular anime are always overrated because each fanbase claims their shit is the best shit ever to come out since sliced bread. They can't all be right at the same time, obviously, so these shows are safely called overrated. I think the problem is more how "overrated" is used and perceived as a criticism or as a synonym for "bad". It's not. It simply means something received more praise than it deserved, maybe because it wasn't as good or as profound as people make it out to be, not that it was bad. Joker was overrated af but it's still a pretty good movie. Slime Isekai on the other hand is not overrated, it's just bad. |
Oct 20, 2020 6:01 PM
#20
Play2X said: Armados said: Overrated is a term often used aimed towards franchises that are simply not good enough for the praise they receive. Their fandoms refuse to admit the very blatant flaws said franchises have. They often treat them as perfect, being toxic towards anyone who thinks otherwise, would try to compare their beloved shitty franchise with everything else and will often diss people for liking something else. For instance, the entire Demon Slayer hype - is it overrated? Yep. The series isn't good, the adaptation of Ufotable is however. People can't differentiate between a good story (which Demon Slayer isn't) to a very good adaptation where a studio carried a series to victory. Another example? Dragon Ball as a whole. The Dragon Ball fandom is filled with dumb, toxic people, who try to compare Goku to literally everything. Funny enough, Goku is one of the dumbest main characters to ever be created. He is badly written, and is as dumb as the people who adore him, so maybe in this case it has more to do with people being able to associate themselves with his idiocy. Same could be said about One Punch Man with Saitama's idiocy, the entire fanbase of "herp derp he is the strongest thing ever hahaha" even though they refuse to admit One's writing is subpar and he messes up way too much in the last couple of years. Very often, the simpler an anime is, the more likely it will become popular - people enjoy stuff that is easy to consume. They care about waifus over plot, they care about random fights and shouting instead of having a gradual buildup towards an emotinally invested fight, they care about big explosions and transformations over technique and planning. These are all fine, but when people start shoving everyone's face their thoughts about how their shit is the best thing ever, and masses of people try to do the same - that's exactly when something enters the overrated territory. Man, there are quite a few things I don't agree with. First of all, the relevant part, the definition of overrated. The way you defined it as lets you appear as some absolute elitist, who thinks their opinion is the only one that matters. Your definition would incline that those, who call shows overrated, are absolutely and always right, because the fandom it is aimed towards is incapable of seeing their flaws. Just no, man. Calling a show "overrated" simple means that a show, or pretty much whatever one rates, has a higher rating than the rater thinks it should have based on whatever scale he uses. Now, to those other little points. You said that Kimetsu no Yaiba is overrated, not good, and only profited of ufotable. How exactly do you come to that conclusion? The only point of those three that is in some way measurable might be the third one, and even that is kinda tricky. Of course, ufotable did an amazing job with Kimetsu no Yaiba, nobody questions that. But we can't say whether the show would've had more success if say david production or KyoAni or Toei would've done the show. Simply because those numbers don't exist, and never really can. The only thing we can really measure would be how much the manga sells grew after the adaptation, but even that wouldn't give us too much to work with. And on Kimetsu no Yaibas qualitiy, how would you rate whether its good or not? You can compare it to your standards, and come to a conclusion whether it works for you or not, but thats about it. Same really with Goku and his character traits. He might not work for you, but he might as well work for a whole lot of other people. Don't get me wrong, I don't particulary like Dragon Ball or Goku, but still. From my perspective as aspiring writer I see an archetypical Paragon hero, unchanging in his attributes, but nonetheless enjoyable if one likes such a kind of character. Well, the last bit... I can't really say you are wrong, because what you described is exactly what happened in movies, and well, also in anime, because the simpler something is, the better you can market it. I mean, would you rather try to sell a simple pen, or a pen with invisible inc which is only readable under the full moon, integrated with voicerecorder, laser pointer and a nuclear warhead? Regarding your first point - I never said people aren't allowed to like something that I don't enjoy. The moment they try to shove into everyone's face about how much their series is great and such while shitting on everyone else is a problem, and it happens way too often. I don't treat ratings or scores as anything regarding being overrated or not, as the scores can easily be messed with and are very easy to manipulate. Now regarding Kimetsu no Yaiba - the series doesn't deliver anything new on its own. Multipile times while watching it I thought it seems way too familiar, and you can literally treat it as a bootleg Bleach. Shallow villians? Yep. They represent nothing other than "I was a human and now I am a demon I kill people but oh no a moment before my death I have a change of heart, time to show a tragic backstory no one asked for so that I could be "redeemed" for a couple of seconds before my gruesome death". The pillars? They don't feel like real characters. They don't act like human beings, their entire characteristics, behavior, thinking process or any action they take is completely related to the pillar they represent. Pillar of love wants to love everyone, the pillar of water being cold and isolated, and so on. It feels too much as if the creator just threw some character templates and never thought of actually making real characters. Tanjirou? "goody too shoes". Feels sorry for demons as if he is some sort of a saint. Has plot armor, poops power boosts out of nowhere, like the fire dance for instance. He isn't an enjoyable MC. Being way too nice in these settings make him feel unreal. His entire family got slaughtered yet he acts the way he does? Please. Zenitsu? That piece of shit of a character is one of the reasons as to why I almost dropped this entire franchise. He isn't funny. He just shouts all of the time, cries and never contributes to the series in any shape or form. Inosuke also always just shouts, but atleast he is a bit more bearable. Nezuko? People like her primarly because she can be a loli and her character design is "cute". She literally isn't a character. She is just a mascot, like Pikachu. She doesn't do anything and has no real reason to exist other than giving a reason for the goody too shoes Tanjirou to run after the main villian who is too overpowered yet completely dumb to react to anything in time. I can continue on and on on why Kimetsu isn't good, but I assume you get my point now. Ufotable carried this series because: A. Kimetsu existed for years prior to the anime, barely anyone cared about the manga, it wasn't doing too well as opposed to now, and even up until episode 18 of the anime people kind of lost interest. It had great hype in the very beginning due to being a non-Fate Ufotable adaptation, but people pretty much forgot about it midway the first cour because it was too slow and didn't go anywhere. Then episode 19 came, that had great animation and people were like "WOW ITS THE BEST THING EVER" even though the entire plot was subpar. Toei wouldn't have been able to carry this because they aren't consistent enough to make a series look good in the long run. While Shaft are great with visuals, they flop pretty hard with battle animations. DavidProductions might have been able to carry this series, pretty much just like they carry Fire Force to a certain extent, although not as much. Kyoani just spams cute girls doing cute things all the time, so they wouldn't adapt this series. Regardless of how you look at it, Ufotable specialize in making eye candy, as they are very good with incorporating computer effects and CGI that actually mesh well in their adaptations. Having Nezuko save her brother isn't something people would go crazy about because its nothing special or unique, we can see it literally everywhere on multipile other animes. But, having the entire fighting sequence with the effects and animation Ufotable made in that exact scenario gave plenty of people the fake impression that Demon Slayer as a whole is good, and not that a very specific scene was done very well. Regarding Goku - do me a favour. Goku is a horrible character. I liked him as a little kid, but guess what? He was acting older during the Z era, especially through the English dub that didn't follow Toriyama's dumb decisions strictly. Look at Dragon Ball Super, check the manga - Goku constantly goes on worse and worse degradation. He literally becomes dumber as time goes on. He never learns from his previous mistakes, he always claims one thing and does the opposite, yet everyone around him love and adore him, even though half the problems created throughout the series are entirely his fault, due to his stupidity and obviously, Akira Toriyama's lack of interest of writing a good story. Now regarding your last point - Something being simpler isn't necessarily better. Its easier to consume, offers cheap entertainment while letting your brain "shut down" and is perfectly fine when you have a bad day and just want to rest. However, its not something that should be pushed literally everywhere, all of the time. Adoring bad writing promotes even more bad writing in the long term, as new writers see the big hot thing and take inspiration from it. People every once in a while want something touching, meaningful, complex, that would make them question what they were saying, be overwhelmed with emotions, be hyped regarding a series without actually knowing what's going to happen next, and so on. This barely happens due to the very low standards a franchise has to have in order to succeed. When people claim someone is a good writer when he/she never plans ahead what their story will be about/what will happen, we begin to have a problem. This is exactly why we have a crapload amount of isekais that feel and follow the exact same bland story, without making even a slight change, and it pretty much harms the entire anime medium as it never lets it reach even a small percentage of its true potential. |
Oct 20, 2020 6:43 PM
#21
Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: How was what I said elitist in any, shape, or form?Adimus_prime said: This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. This is the most elitist thing I've ever read. Maybe by how you judged people based on a single word they used? |
Oct 20, 2020 6:49 PM
#22
Overrated --> Over Rated --> Something that is rated over where it "should" be Should be? Fuck this shit, overrated isn't a thing. |
Please sign up for MangAlert! It's a little project I made that I'd really like to see the light of day and some users. MangAlert! (please sign up!) GitHub Repo (please star!) |
Oct 20, 2020 7:12 PM
#23
Hrybami said: Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Adimus_prime said: This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. This is the most elitist thing I've ever read. Maybe by how you judged people based on a single word they used? It's not like my judgment holds no truth to it. How many times have we seen someone say "(Insert anime here) is overrated" and provide no reason as to why it is overrated. Which is why I say calling an anime overrated is criticism for people who have no criticism. Since people like a show a lot does nothing to the quality show itself. Also the reason I called them "tryhards who want to seem like they have the pinnacle of taste" is that your not gonna see someone call an obscure anime that no one talks about overrated because no one talks about the show. It is always the new popular show that is airing or some highly respected show because that's the way you're gonna get the brownie points from the actual elitists who just shit on what everyone else likes and think that they have better taste because of it. |
Oct 20, 2020 7:14 PM
#24
Adimus_prime said: This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. This is a self-defeating statement. |
Oct 20, 2020 7:18 PM
#25
Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: How was what I said elitist in any, shape, or form?Adimus_prime said: This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. This is the most elitist thing I've ever read. Maybe by how you judged people based on a single word they used? It's not like my judgment holds no truth to it. How many times have we seen someone say "(Insert anime here) is overrated" and provide no reason as to why it is overrated. Which is why I say calling an anime overrated is criticism for people who have no criticism. Since people like a show a lot does nothing to the quality show itself. Also the reason I called them "tryhards who want to seem like they have the pinnacle of taste" is that your not gonna see someone call an obscure anime that no one talks about overrated because no one talks about the show. It is always the new popular show that is airing or some highly respected show because that's the way you're gonna get the brownie points from the actual elitists who just shit on what everyone else likes and think that they have better taste because of it. Overrated is not a criticism. What are you talking about? And why would anyone call a obscure anime overrated if there is no one to overrate them in the first place? Here for you: Ferien said: Why do people overthink the meaning of the word? It's just a personal opinion of an individual of thinking that a certain work is given more value by everyone else than the one he/she believes it really deserves. It doesn't mean anything else. |
Oct 20, 2020 7:19 PM
#26
It's niche enough that people are vocal about it being a masterpiece while also a large number of people think they're not good enough. |
Oct 20, 2020 7:23 PM
#27
Calling something "overrated", as true as it may seem is strictly subjective. Generally when people refer to something as being "overrated" they are claiming that the masses praise a show far more than it deserves to be. However, if a show is being highly praised by a majority, than it is in fact "highly rated" in general, but that high rating that the majority attributes to the show is "overrated" in your opinion. |
Blanks. |
Oct 20, 2020 7:32 PM
#28
Oct 20, 2020 7:33 PM
#29
Hrybami said: Yes I know overrated isn't a criticism which I said "It is a criticism for people who have no criticism " because you can't fault a show for people liking it. So therefore it isn't a criticism. Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: How was what I said elitist in any, shape, or form?Adimus_prime said: This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. This is the most elitist thing I've ever read. Maybe by how you judged people based on a single word they used? It's not like my judgment holds no truth to it. How many times have we seen someone say "(Insert anime here) is overrated" and provide no reason as to why it is overrated. Which is why I say calling an anime overrated is criticism for people who have no criticism. Since people like a show a lot does nothing to the quality show itself. Also the reason I called them "tryhards who want to seem like they have the pinnacle of taste" is that your not gonna see someone call an obscure anime that no one talks about overrated because no one talks about the show. It is always the new popular show that is airing or some highly respected show because that's the way you're gonna get the brownie points from the actual elitists who just shit on what everyone else likes and think that they have better taste because of it. Overrated is not a criticism. What are you talking about? And why would anyone call a obscure anime overrated if there is no one to overrate them in the first place? Here for you: Ferien said: Why do people overthink the meaning of the word? It's just a personal opinion of an individual of thinking that a certain work is given more value by everyone else than the one he/she believes it really deserves. It doesn't mean anything else. Also I never said that it wasn't the meaning because that is definition. However here in the anime community the words meaning has been completely destroyed because most of the instances you see people using the word overrated just boils down to "I don't like this show there for it is overrated because I don't like it". |
Oct 20, 2020 7:39 PM
#30
Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Yes I know overrated isn't a criticism which I said "It is a criticism for people who have no criticism " because you can't fault a show for people liking it. So therefore it isn't a criticism. Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: How was what I said elitist in any, shape, or form?Adimus_prime said: This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. This is the most elitist thing I've ever read. Maybe by how you judged people based on a single word they used? It's not like my judgment holds no truth to it. How many times have we seen someone say "(Insert anime here) is overrated" and provide no reason as to why it is overrated. Which is why I say calling an anime overrated is criticism for people who have no criticism. Since people like a show a lot does nothing to the quality show itself. Also the reason I called them "tryhards who want to seem like they have the pinnacle of taste" is that your not gonna see someone call an obscure anime that no one talks about overrated because no one talks about the show. It is always the new popular show that is airing or some highly respected show because that's the way you're gonna get the brownie points from the actual elitists who just shit on what everyone else likes and think that they have better taste because of it. Overrated is not a criticism. What are you talking about? And why would anyone call a obscure anime overrated if there is no one to overrate them in the first place? Here for you: Ferien said: Why do people overthink the meaning of the word? It's just a personal opinion of an individual of thinking that a certain work is given more value by everyone else than the one he/she believes it really deserves. It doesn't mean anything else. Also I never said that it wasn't the meaning because that is definition. However here in the anime community the words meaning has been completely destroyed because most of the instances you see people using the word overrated just boils down to "I don't like this show there for it is overrated because I don't like it". I have never seen anyone says that they didn't like a show because it is overrated. That sounds really absurd and surreal as a reason to dislike an anime. |
Oct 20, 2020 7:42 PM
#31
"Overrated" is a word meaning that, in one's own subjective opinion, the work doesn't measure up to what the consensus opinion says. If that doesn't make sense to you, just replace it with the words, 'not as good as people say it is', e.g. "This anime is [not as good as people say it is]." Frankly, I think it's hilarious how bent out of shape people get about it. Like, can't you let other people talk about their opinions? |
Oct 20, 2020 7:47 PM
#32
Hrybami said: Maybe I just spend to much time on anitwitter because it is like all across there. Anitwitter is a cesspit of shit takes and people just calling shows overrated and saying they don't like it because it is overrated.Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: How was what I said elitist in any, shape, or form?Adimus_prime said: This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. This is the most elitist thing I've ever read. Maybe by how you judged people based on a single word they used? It's not like my judgment holds no truth to it. How many times have we seen someone say "(Insert anime here) is overrated" and provide no reason as to why it is overrated. Which is why I say calling an anime overrated is criticism for people who have no criticism. Since people like a show a lot does nothing to the quality show itself. Also the reason I called them "tryhards who want to seem like they have the pinnacle of taste" is that your not gonna see someone call an obscure anime that no one talks about overrated because no one talks about the show. It is always the new popular show that is airing or some highly respected show because that's the way you're gonna get the brownie points from the actual elitists who just shit on what everyone else likes and think that they have better taste because of it. Overrated is not a criticism. What are you talking about? And why would anyone call a obscure anime overrated if there is no one to overrate them in the first place? Here for you: Ferien said: Why do people overthink the meaning of the word? It's just a personal opinion of an individual of thinking that a certain work is given more value by everyone else than the one he/she believes it really deserves. It doesn't mean anything else. Also I never said that it wasn't the meaning because that is definition. However here in the anime community the words meaning has been completely destroyed because most of the instances you see people using the word overrated just boils down to "I don't like this show there for it is overrated because I don't like it". I have never seen anyone says that they didn't like a show because it is overrated. That sounds really absurd and surreal as a reason to dislike an anime. |
Oct 20, 2020 7:52 PM
#33
Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Maybe I just spend to much time on anitwitter because it is like all across there. Anitwitter is a cesspit of shit takes and people just calling shows overrated and saying they don't like it because it is overrated.Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Yes I know overrated isn't a criticism which I said "It is a criticism for people who have no criticism " because you can't fault a show for people liking it. So therefore it isn't a criticism. Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: How was what I said elitist in any, shape, or form?Adimus_prime said: This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. This is the most elitist thing I've ever read. Maybe by how you judged people based on a single word they used? It's not like my judgment holds no truth to it. How many times have we seen someone say "(Insert anime here) is overrated" and provide no reason as to why it is overrated. Which is why I say calling an anime overrated is criticism for people who have no criticism. Since people like a show a lot does nothing to the quality show itself. Also the reason I called them "tryhards who want to seem like they have the pinnacle of taste" is that your not gonna see someone call an obscure anime that no one talks about overrated because no one talks about the show. It is always the new popular show that is airing or some highly respected show because that's the way you're gonna get the brownie points from the actual elitists who just shit on what everyone else likes and think that they have better taste because of it. Overrated is not a criticism. What are you talking about? And why would anyone call a obscure anime overrated if there is no one to overrate them in the first place? Here for you: Ferien said: Why do people overthink the meaning of the word? It's just a personal opinion of an individual of thinking that a certain work is given more value by everyone else than the one he/she believes it really deserves. It doesn't mean anything else. Also I never said that it wasn't the meaning because that is definition. However here in the anime community the words meaning has been completely destroyed because most of the instances you see people using the word overrated just boils down to "I don't like this show there for it is overrated because I don't like it". I have never seen anyone says that they didn't like a show because it is overrated. That sounds really absurd and surreal as a reason to dislike an anime. No idea what Anitwitter could be, but that sounds like an awful place. At least here on MAL people refer to the rating a show is getting and I'm pretty sure that everyone who said overrated at least had a reason to why they think that. |
Oct 20, 2020 8:01 PM
#34
Hrybami said: It's just regular twitter but the part devoted to talking about anime and it's dreadful I go there half the time just to see how many shit takes I can see.Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Yes I know overrated isn't a criticism which I said "It is a criticism for people who have no criticism " because you can't fault a show for people liking it. So therefore it isn't a criticism. Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: Adimus_prime said: Hrybami said: How was what I said elitist in any, shape, or form?Adimus_prime said: This an unpopular opinion of mine but a lot of people only call shows overrated when they have no real criticism of it. Who are you to decide how many people should like a show? The word "overrated" has become such a buzzword for tryhards who want to seem like they have "The pinnacle of taste" so bad and I am genuinely sick of see that word everytime someone want to have "hot take". So in conclusion the word overrated is overrated. This is the most elitist thing I've ever read. Maybe by how you judged people based on a single word they used? It's not like my judgment holds no truth to it. How many times have we seen someone say "(Insert anime here) is overrated" and provide no reason as to why it is overrated. Which is why I say calling an anime overrated is criticism for people who have no criticism. Since people like a show a lot does nothing to the quality show itself. Also the reason I called them "tryhards who want to seem like they have the pinnacle of taste" is that your not gonna see someone call an obscure anime that no one talks about overrated because no one talks about the show. It is always the new popular show that is airing or some highly respected show because that's the way you're gonna get the brownie points from the actual elitists who just shit on what everyone else likes and think that they have better taste because of it. Overrated is not a criticism. What are you talking about? And why would anyone call a obscure anime overrated if there is no one to overrate them in the first place? Here for you: Ferien said: Why do people overthink the meaning of the word? It's just a personal opinion of an individual of thinking that a certain work is given more value by everyone else than the one he/she believes it really deserves. It doesn't mean anything else. Also I never said that it wasn't the meaning because that is definition. However here in the anime community the words meaning has been completely destroyed because most of the instances you see people using the word overrated just boils down to "I don't like this show there for it is overrated because I don't like it". I have never seen anyone says that they didn't like a show because it is overrated. That sounds really absurd and surreal as a reason to dislike an anime. No idea what Anitwitter could be, but that sounds like an awful place. At least here on MAL people refer to the rating a show is getting and I'm pretty sure that everyone who said overrated at least had a reason to why they think that. |
Oct 20, 2020 8:03 PM
#35
wape said: Whenever someone uses the word "overrated" - all it means is "lots of other people liked it, but I didn't." Facts, you got a point. they just want to hate on popular anime just because they particularly didn't find it interesting- and thats bound to happen at some point.. lol |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Oct 20, 2020 8:03 PM
#36
I subjectively don't like this anime/manga and think it's getting too much praise = "Overrated" |
Oct 20, 2020 8:54 PM
#37
An anime to be overrated is just subjective. A person who feels like x anime is overrated which means that [i]he[i/] feels that anime does not deserve the praise its getting. Those type of fans who shit on modern animes are usually the veterans. While some people feel that x anime is perfectly rated. So an anime to be overrated is entirely subjective. |
Scordolo's Recent Reviews To your eternity Vanitas no Karte |
Oct 20, 2020 11:25 PM
#38
At the end of the day you can't like or dislike an anime on somebody else's behalf. As platforms become more accessible to everyone, MAL or IMDB or Metacritic tomatoes, this is bound to happen, as the very frequent clickbaity use of "underappreciated" in the threads 'round here. Some anime is more successful than the rest, and yes, it doesn't mean it's exceptional or gamechanging, but to each their own. |
Oct 21, 2020 2:01 AM
#39
It is impossible to like every single anime from the MAL top 100; thus, you will think that some of them are bad, despite the score and popularity. Those are the anime you consider overrated; it is subjective and it doesn't mean that no one is allowed to enjoy them. You may think "even if I dislike something, I don't consider it overrated, it just isn't my cup of tea", but what if thousands and thousands of people feel the same? We are getting closer to a less subjective definition of overrated. It can't be a coincidence if some anime pop up more frequently whenever there's a thread about overrated anime (talking about Shigatsu for example). |
Oct 21, 2020 2:25 AM
#40
overrated in anime is nonsense and is used by some lookatmeimcoolgoingagainstmajority and some imveteranotakudude, ohh btw english is not my first languange so bear with it. lets set an example, NARUTO is one of the best anime that i ever watched, why? i dont talk about the graphic, audio quality or plot or anything, just understand this one thing, if overrated is used, then your mom is overrated by u, understood?, its about the feeling not about plot or graphic or audio or anything, that kind of things is just like a cover of the book its just make u want to watch it, decades ago "a boy that could pull holy sword that no one could do" was a big hit and popular but now its not, its become mainstream, but if you're new to this story, its cool. humans are subjective, so we dont talk about entertainment objectively, Subjective is what makes sh1t anime becomes popular and i love it ;) |
Oct 21, 2020 4:07 AM
#41
It means that something is praised more than it should. An anime can be overrated and still be good at the same time. |
Oct 21, 2020 4:32 AM
#42
Armados said: Regarding your first point - I never said people aren't allowed to like something that I don't enjoy. The moment they try to shove into everyone's face about how much their series is great and such while shitting on everyone else is a problem, and it happens way too often. I don't treat ratings or scores as anything regarding being overrated or not, as the scores can easily be messed with and are very easy to manipulate. This is unfortunately pretty much what I expected. You say that people are allowed to enjoy shows yo dislike, yet a single paragraph later you go over an anime you dislike and how it is overrated with little more than 'I don't like it.' The person who is 'shoving their opinion into someones face about how a series is shit' is you, dear sir (or lady) Way to proove a point I guess. I'll put the rest into a spoiler, because this is technically off-topic, if this continues we should do that on our pinwall or something. Armados said: the series doesn't deliver anything new on its own. Multipile times while watching it I thought it seems way too familiar, and you can literally treat it as a bootleg Bleach. Shallow villians? Yep. They represent nothing other than "I was a human and now I am a demon I kill people but oh no a moment before my death I have a change of heart, time to show a tragic backstory no one asked for so that I could be "redeemed" for a couple of seconds before my gruesome death". The pillars? They don't feel like real characters. They don't act like human beings, their entire characteristics, behavior, thinking process or any action they take is completely related to the pillar they represent. Pillar of love wants to love everyone, the pillar of water being cold and isolated, and so on. It feels too much as if the creator just threw some character templates and never thought of actually making real characters. Tanjirou? "goody too shoes". Feels sorry for demons as if he is some sort of a saint. Has plot armor, poops power boosts out of nowhere, like the fire dance for instance. He isn't an enjoyable MC. Being way too nice in these settings make him feel unreal. His entire family got slaughtered yet he acts the way he does? Please. Zenitsu? That piece of shit of a character is one of the reasons as to why I almost dropped this entire franchise. He isn't funny. He just shouts all of the time, cries and never contributes to the series in any shape or form. Inosuke also always just shouts, but atleast he is a bit more bearable. Nezuko? People like her primarly because she can be a loli and her character design is "cute". She literally isn't a character. She is just a mascot, like Pikachu. She doesn't do anything and has no real reason to exist other than giving a reason for the goody too shoes Tanjirou to run after the main villian who is too overpowered yet completely dumb to react to anything in time. The one thing I definitely agree with is that Kimetsu no Yaiba doesn't re-invent the wheel or something. But to be fair, no show really does. I don't know how familiar you are with writing, but it goes so far that Cambell goes as far as saying that every story in humanity has the same beads, and calls it the monomyth. I wouldn't go as far, but it should be obvious that similar shows in the same genre has similar plotpoints as well. I mean, heck, Star Wars' plot is heavily inspired by The hidden Fortress, Wheel of Time by Lord of the Rings, which in turn is inspired by Beowulf. Humanity just sucks at creating 'new' things. Shows are good if they do the usual stuff well, which Kimetsu no Yaiba does, or if they put a twist on something, which Kimetsu no Yaiba also does. It is kinda funny that you dislike Nezuko and think that she has no relevance, since she is actually the new thing in the story. Don't get me wrong, Nezuko is pretty darn adorable, but in the story, she also has relevance. Usually the hero characters don't have the pressure to do something immediately. If you look at Naruto or One Piece (Bleach is the one show of the Big 3 I didn't watch) the main character has some kind of dream and works toward it, and at some point, they are the Otaku King or whatever. By adding Nezuko, who we never can be really sure if she'll be okay, we get a sort of ticking clock, which adds urgence to the show. While I am also not a fan of the side characters, I get what their role is, so I don't mind them as much. Finally on Tanjirou. I get the feeling that you simply dislike Shonen protagonists at this point. I know that a lot of people dislike characters who have the compassion to forgive enemies and believe in the goodness in everyone, but this is just your personal preference then. I, for example happen to like this type of character, and while I am not as good, I also behave kinda similar. Armados said: I can continue on and on on why Kimetsu isn't good, but I assume you get my point now. Ufotable carried this series because: A. Kimetsu existed for years prior to the anime, barely anyone cared about the manga, it wasn't doing too well as opposed to now, and even up until episode 18 of the anime people kind of lost interest. It had great hype in the very beginning due to being a non-Fate Ufotable adaptation, but people pretty much forgot about it midway the first cour because it was too slow and didn't go anywhere. Then episode 19 came, that had great animation and people were like "WOW ITS THE BEST THING EVER" even though the entire plot was subpar. Toei wouldn't have been able to carry this because they aren't consistent enough to make a series look good in the long run. While Shaft are great with visuals, they flop pretty hard with battle animations. DavidProductions might have been able to carry this series, pretty much just like they carry Fire Force to a certain extent, although not as much. Kyoani just spams cute girls doing cute things all the time, so they wouldn't adapt this series. Regardless of how you look at it, Ufotable specialize in making eye candy, as they are very good with incorporating computer effects and CGI that actually mesh well in their adaptations. Having Nezuko save her brother isn't something people would go crazy about because its nothing special or unique, we can see it literally everywhere on multipile other animes. But, having the entire fighting sequence with the effects and animation Ufotable made in that exact scenario gave plenty of people the fake impression that Demon Slayer as a whole is good, and not that a very specific scene was done very well. This isn't true. The reason it got an anime adaption in the first place is because it did well beforehand. Also, while obviously a lot of people jumped the bandwagon of episode 19, a lot of people already watched this show beforehand. In fact, my score of the show didn't change at all. This is of course anecdotal, but well. The companies I named were by the way only to make a point. I am aware that especially KyoAni and Toei wouldn't produce the show in a way that enhances it. My point is that we can't tell how good or bad the show would have been, because, well, it only exists in this one form. Armados said: Regarding Goku - do me a favour. Goku is a horrible character. I liked him as a little kid, but guess what? He was acting older during the Z era, especially through the English dub that didn't follow Toriyama's dumb decisions strictly. Look at Dragon Ball Super, check the manga - Goku constantly goes on worse and worse degradation. He literally becomes dumber as time goes on. He never learns from his previous mistakes, he always claims one thing and does the opposite, yet everyone around him love and adore him, even though half the problems created throughout the series are entirely his fault, due to his stupidity and obviously, Akira Toriyama's lack of interest of writing a good story. Again, you are free to dislike Goku, but that doesn't make him a bad character. In fact, there are quite a lot of characters with a similar lack of development. Sherlock Holmes, Indiana Jones, Superman, James Bond (before Daniel Shit),... those are 'iconic' characters, and aren't supposed to change. The "problem" in my opinion is, that we only ever get Goku doing the fighting, which gets repetetive quickly, which is what I dislike about the show as well. And even though I absolutely HATE Superman, this is the one thing the writers did better: They don't just have him fighting all the time, but interacting with the people around him in a more meaningful way. Armados said: Now regarding your last point - Something being simpler isn't necessarily better. Its easier to consume, offers cheap entertainment while letting your brain "shut down" and is perfectly fine when you have a bad day and just want to rest. However, its not something that should be pushed literally everywhere, all of the time. Adoring bad writing promotes even more bad writing in the long term, as new writers see the big hot thing and take inspiration from it. People every once in a while want something touching, meaningful, complex, that would make them question what they were saying, be overwhelmed with emotions, be hyped regarding a series without actually knowing what's going to happen next, and so on. This barely happens due to the very low standards a franchise has to have in order to succeed. When people claim someone is a good writer when he/she never plans ahead what their story will be about/what will happen, we begin to have a problem. This is exactly why we have a crapload amount of isekais that feel and follow the exact same bland story, without making even a slight change, and it pretty much harms the entire anime medium as it never lets it reach even a small percentage of its true potential. Yes, I never said it is better. I said it is easier to market, which in turn makes it more profitable. However, I don't think that meaningful anime will just disappear or something. No matter what we watch, there will always be easily marketable anime, as well as those niche 'Monster' style anime or whatever you want. I don't think hating on mainstream shows will really change that. |
Oct 21, 2020 4:43 AM
#43
Play2X said: Armados said: Regarding your first point - I never said people aren't allowed to like something that I don't enjoy. The moment they try to shove into everyone's face about how much their series is great and such while shitting on everyone else is a problem, and it happens way too often. I don't treat ratings or scores as anything regarding being overrated or not, as the scores can easily be messed with and are very easy to manipulate. This is unfortunately pretty much what I expected. You say that people are allowed to enjoy shows yo dislike, yet a single paragraph later you go over an anime you dislike and how it is overrated with little more than 'I don't like it.' The person who is 'shoving their opinion into someones face about how a series is shit' is you, dear sir (or lady) Way to proove a point I guess. I'll put the rest into a spoiler, because this is technically off-topic, if this continues we should do that on our pinwall or something. Armados said: the series doesn't deliver anything new on its own. Multipile times while watching it I thought it seems way too familiar, and you can literally treat it as a bootleg Bleach. Shallow villians? Yep. They represent nothing other than "I was a human and now I am a demon I kill people but oh no a moment before my death I have a change of heart, time to show a tragic backstory no one asked for so that I could be "redeemed" for a couple of seconds before my gruesome death". The pillars? They don't feel like real characters. They don't act like human beings, their entire characteristics, behavior, thinking process or any action they take is completely related to the pillar they represent. Pillar of love wants to love everyone, the pillar of water being cold and isolated, and so on. It feels too much as if the creator just threw some character templates and never thought of actually making real characters. Tanjirou? "goody too shoes". Feels sorry for demons as if he is some sort of a saint. Has plot armor, poops power boosts out of nowhere, like the fire dance for instance. He isn't an enjoyable MC. Being way too nice in these settings make him feel unreal. His entire family got slaughtered yet he acts the way he does? Please. Zenitsu? That piece of shit of a character is one of the reasons as to why I almost dropped this entire franchise. He isn't funny. He just shouts all of the time, cries and never contributes to the series in any shape or form. Inosuke also always just shouts, but atleast he is a bit more bearable. Nezuko? People like her primarly because she can be a loli and her character design is "cute". She literally isn't a character. She is just a mascot, like Pikachu. She doesn't do anything and has no real reason to exist other than giving a reason for the goody too shoes Tanjirou to run after the main villian who is too overpowered yet completely dumb to react to anything in time. The one thing I definitely agree with is that Kimetsu no Yaiba doesn't re-invent the wheel or something. But to be fair, no show really does. I don't know how familiar you are with writing, but it goes so far that Cambell goes as far as saying that every story in humanity has the same beads, and calls it the monomyth. I wouldn't go as far, but it should be obvious that similar shows in the same genre has similar plotpoints as well. I mean, heck, Star Wars' plot is heavily inspired by The hidden Fortress, Wheel of Time by Lord of the Rings, which in turn is inspired by Beowulf. Humanity just sucks at creating 'new' things. Shows are good if they do the usual stuff well, which Kimetsu no Yaiba does, or if they put a twist on something, which Kimetsu no Yaiba also does. It is kinda funny that you dislike Nezuko and think that she has no relevance, since she is actually the new thing in the story. Don't get me wrong, Nezuko is pretty darn adorable, but in the story, she also has relevance. Usually the hero characters don't have the pressure to do something immediately. If you look at Naruto or One Piece (Bleach is the one show of the Big 3 I didn't watch) the main character has some kind of dream and works toward it, and at some point, they are the Otaku King or whatever. By adding Nezuko, who we never can be really sure if she'll be okay, we get a sort of ticking clock, which adds urgence to the show. While I am also not a fan of the side characters, I get what their role is, so I don't mind them as much. Finally on Tanjirou. I get the feeling that you simply dislike Shonen protagonists at this point. I know that a lot of people dislike characters who have the compassion to forgive enemies and believe in the goodness in everyone, but this is just your personal preference then. I, for example happen to like this type of character, and while I am not as good, I also behave kinda similar. Armados said: I can continue on and on on why Kimetsu isn't good, but I assume you get my point now. Ufotable carried this series because: A. Kimetsu existed for years prior to the anime, barely anyone cared about the manga, it wasn't doing too well as opposed to now, and even up until episode 18 of the anime people kind of lost interest. It had great hype in the very beginning due to being a non-Fate Ufotable adaptation, but people pretty much forgot about it midway the first cour because it was too slow and didn't go anywhere. Then episode 19 came, that had great animation and people were like "WOW ITS THE BEST THING EVER" even though the entire plot was subpar. Toei wouldn't have been able to carry this because they aren't consistent enough to make a series look good in the long run. While Shaft are great with visuals, they flop pretty hard with battle animations. DavidProductions might have been able to carry this series, pretty much just like they carry Fire Force to a certain extent, although not as much. Kyoani just spams cute girls doing cute things all the time, so they wouldn't adapt this series. Regardless of how you look at it, Ufotable specialize in making eye candy, as they are very good with incorporating computer effects and CGI that actually mesh well in their adaptations. Having Nezuko save her brother isn't something people would go crazy about because its nothing special or unique, we can see it literally everywhere on multipile other animes. But, having the entire fighting sequence with the effects and animation Ufotable made in that exact scenario gave plenty of people the fake impression that Demon Slayer as a whole is good, and not that a very specific scene was done very well. This isn't true. The reason it got an anime adaption in the first place is because it did well beforehand. Also, while obviously a lot of people jumped the bandwagon of episode 19, a lot of people already watched this show beforehand. In fact, my score of the show didn't change at all. This is of course anecdotal, but well. The companies I named were by the way only to make a point. I am aware that especially KyoAni and Toei wouldn't produce the show in a way that enhances it. My point is that we can't tell how good or bad the show would have been, because, well, it only exists in this one form. Armados said: Regarding Goku - do me a favour. Goku is a horrible character. I liked him as a little kid, but guess what? He was acting older during the Z era, especially through the English dub that didn't follow Toriyama's dumb decisions strictly. Look at Dragon Ball Super, check the manga - Goku constantly goes on worse and worse degradation. He literally becomes dumber as time goes on. He never learns from his previous mistakes, he always claims one thing and does the opposite, yet everyone around him love and adore him, even though half the problems created throughout the series are entirely his fault, due to his stupidity and obviously, Akira Toriyama's lack of interest of writing a good story. Again, you are free to dislike Goku, but that doesn't make him a bad character. In fact, there are quite a lot of characters with a similar lack of development. Sherlock Holmes, Indiana Jones, Superman, James Bond (before Daniel Shit),... those are 'iconic' characters, and aren't supposed to change. The "problem" in my opinion is, that we only ever get Goku doing the fighting, which gets repetetive quickly, which is what I dislike about the show as well. And even though I absolutely HATE Superman, this is the one thing the writers did better: They don't just have him fighting all the time, but interacting with the people around him in a more meaningful way. Armados said: Now regarding your last point - Something being simpler isn't necessarily better. Its easier to consume, offers cheap entertainment while letting your brain "shut down" and is perfectly fine when you have a bad day and just want to rest. However, its not something that should be pushed literally everywhere, all of the time. Adoring bad writing promotes even more bad writing in the long term, as new writers see the big hot thing and take inspiration from it. People every once in a while want something touching, meaningful, complex, that would make them question what they were saying, be overwhelmed with emotions, be hyped regarding a series without actually knowing what's going to happen next, and so on. This barely happens due to the very low standards a franchise has to have in order to succeed. When people claim someone is a good writer when he/she never plans ahead what their story will be about/what will happen, we begin to have a problem. This is exactly why we have a crapload amount of isekais that feel and follow the exact same bland story, without making even a slight change, and it pretty much harms the entire anime medium as it never lets it reach even a small percentage of its true potential. Yes, I never said it is better. I said it is easier to market, which in turn makes it more profitable. However, I don't think that meaningful anime will just disappear or something. No matter what we watch, there will always be easily marketable anime, as well as those niche 'Monster' style anime or whatever you want. I don't think hating on mainstream shows will really change that. I'll only reply to the stuff regarding the definition of overrated, as everything else goes off topic and people might get annoyed if they see walls of text related to how good/bad Kimetsu and Goku are. I don't fall under the same explanation I gave. I don't just run towards the Demon Slayer's community and tell them what they love is trash. You asked me to hand over my opinion as to why I think the series is trash, and I explained my point of view. There is a vast difference between having an opinion, and trying to shove your opinion into everyone's face. I accept people like mediocre/bad stuff, I don't force people to change, but if people ask me to explain my opinion I just do, regardless of whether you like it or not, including shitting on said franchises to explain how I see them precisely. DB fans constantly have this dick measurement contest of "how strong a character from X franchise compared to Goku", and they always try to shit on other franchises due to the characters' powerlevels. Same goes with One Punch Man and Saitama fans. Same could go with JoJo fans and how everything in JoJo is "better" than everything else because "reasons". That's when a show is overrated, not because someone is stating their opinion when they are asked to explain it. |
Oct 21, 2020 4:44 AM
#44
Armados said: Overrated is a term often used aimed towards franchises that are simply not good enough for the praise they receive. Their fandoms refuse to admit the very blatant flaws said franchises have. They often treat them as perfect, being toxic towards anyone who thinks otherwise, would try to compare their beloved shitty franchise with everything else and will often diss people for liking something else. For instance, the entire Demon Slayer hype - is it overrated? Yep. The series isn't good, the adaptation of Ufotable is however. People can't differentiate between a good story (which Demon Slayer isn't) to a very good adaptation where a studio carried a series to victory. Another example? Dragon Ball as a whole. The Dragon Ball fandom is filled with dumb, toxic people, who try to compare Goku to literally everything. Funny enough, Goku is one of the dumbest main characters to ever be created. He is badly written, and is as dumb as the people who adore him, so maybe in this case it has more to do with people being able to associate themselves with his idiocy. Same could be said about One Punch Man with Saitama's idiocy, the entire fanbase of "herp derp he is the strongest thing ever hahaha" even though they refuse to admit One's writing is subpar and he messes up way too much in the last couple of years. Very often, the simpler an anime is, the more likely it will become popular - people enjoy stuff that is easy to consume. They care about waifus over plot, they care about random fights and shouting instead of having a gradual buildup towards an emotinally invested fight, they care about big explosions and transformations over technique and planning. These are all fine, but when people start shoving everyone's face their thoughts about how their shit is the best thing ever, and masses of people try to do the same - that's exactly when something enters the overrated territory. THANK YOU! People like you give me hope in this community. The real problem of this situation, when the masses really start forcing their opinion that a show with a weak plot (a conclusion you can make by analyzing the plot without the influence of personal feelings or opinions) is the best thing ever, is that it is extremely disrespectful to other works that genuinely cared about making their plot good. People can like whatever they want. Hell, I don't care if a show like that is your favorite of all time. But wanting the show to be treated as some kind of masterpiece is pretty much saying a big "Fuck You!" to other works that clearly cared into making their story work. |
BetterTasteOct 21, 2020 4:50 AM
Oct 21, 2020 5:01 AM
#45
"Overrated" is a term with multiple meanings purely dependant on the context and subject matter. For instance, a popular series can be overrated for its popularity if its actual quality is inferior to less popular titles (eg. Bleach's popularity is overrated when both Yu Yu Hakusho and Saint Seiya did what it did better), yet it could also refer to the negative aspects of it being overrated when it comes to generalisations or incomplete information on the medium (eg. Saying filler in anime is inherently bad would be overrating the damaging quality of filler material when some can be used to fill in gaps in a work such as the Saiyan Arc filler in DBZ improving Gohan's character development or the Asgard Arc of Saint Seiya offering some interesting character writing). In other words, "overrated" is requires context to the extent there can be no one definitive meaning, though the most common usage of it would probably be towards series who's praise is undeserved either in its large volume or in general. |
Oct 21, 2020 5:10 AM
#46
Every time I've seen it used it basically meant "people should stop liking that as much as they do". It's a shockingly lazy word, used by people who refuse to use their brains to the point that they'd have to compile actual criticism of something and since they're lazy shits they fall back on their gloriously all-including jack-of-all-trades word: overrated. It doesn't add anything to the discussion, it directly antagonises anyone who likes the series/whatever else by invalidating their feelings (" you should like it less " is that, there's no other way of seeing it), it's obnoxiously arrogant and it doesn't lead to any constructive exchange, since it's not constructive criticism (it's not even criticism, if we're being honest). I used it more than once in the past so this point of view comes from direct experience ;) |
"The problem with defining even an aspect of your personality by something that you like, is that criticism of that product appears to you to be criticism of you personally. I find it to be a very harmful attitude, [...] you can't rationally discuss a product because you've started to define yourself by its very existence." John Bain |
Oct 21, 2020 6:12 AM
#47
Armados said: I'll only reply to the stuff regarding the definition of overrated, as everything else goes off topic and people might get annoyed if they see walls of text related to how good/bad Kimetsu and Goku are. I don't fall under the same explanation I gave. I don't just run towards the Demon Slayer's community and tell them what they love is trash. You asked me to hand over my opinion as to why I think the series is trash, and I explained my point of view. There is a vast difference between having an opinion, and trying to shove your opinion into everyone's face. I accept people like mediocre/bad stuff, I don't force people to change, but if people ask me to explain my opinion I just do, regardless of whether you like it or not, including shitting on said franchises to explain how I see them precisely. DB fans constantly have this dick measurement contest of "how strong a character from X franchise compared to Goku", and they always try to shit on other franchises due to the characters' powerlevels. Same goes with One Punch Man and Saitama fans. Same could go with JoJo fans and how everything in JoJo is "better" than everything else because "reasons". That's when a show is overrated, not because someone is stating their opinion when they are asked to explain it. Just saying, but I never asked for your opinion, since you posted first. Your opening post had lines in which you stated that Kimetsu is overrated and the community of said show is toxic, etc. At that point you didn't even know of my existence yet. Don't get me wrong, I subconsciously call shows bad all the time even though I know that there is no such thing as a truly bad show, only shows that worked for people and those that didn't. I merely mentioned it, because you came off as a jerk the way you phrased it and sounded sometimes like the pot calling the cattle black. I'm repeating myself here, but I know I do that more often subconsciously than I want to admit, but as long as we are able to admit that, we might be able to increase the general quality of discussions on that site, which would help everyone in the community having a better day. Quite honestly, I'm not active enough to have seen people do dickcontests on who is stronger. It is certainly a fun activity every once in a while as long as people stay civilized and only use facts, but like I said, haven't dealt enough with those groups of fans. thiago52192 said: THANK YOU! People like you give me hope in this community. The real problem of this situation, when the masses really start forcing their opinion that a show with a weak plot (a conclusion you can make by analyzing the plot without the influence of personal feelings or opinions) is the best thing ever, is that it is extremely disrespectful to other works that genuinely cared about making their plot good. People can like whatever they want. Hell, I don't care if a show like that is your favorite of all time. But wanting the show to be treated as some kind of masterpiece is pretty much saying a big "Fuck You!" to other works that clearly cared into making their story work. You might want to read the full conversation Armados and I just had, because you pretty much are being just as toxic as the other side there. |
Play2XOct 21, 2020 6:16 AM
Oct 21, 2020 6:31 AM
#48
Play2X said: Armados said: I'll only reply to the stuff regarding the definition of overrated, as everything else goes off topic and people might get annoyed if they see walls of text related to how good/bad Kimetsu and Goku are. I don't fall under the same explanation I gave. I don't just run towards the Demon Slayer's community and tell them what they love is trash. You asked me to hand over my opinion as to why I think the series is trash, and I explained my point of view. There is a vast difference between having an opinion, and trying to shove your opinion into everyone's face. I accept people like mediocre/bad stuff, I don't force people to change, but if people ask me to explain my opinion I just do, regardless of whether you like it or not, including shitting on said franchises to explain how I see them precisely. DB fans constantly have this dick measurement contest of "how strong a character from X franchise compared to Goku", and they always try to shit on other franchises due to the characters' powerlevels. Same goes with One Punch Man and Saitama fans. Same could go with JoJo fans and how everything in JoJo is "better" than everything else because "reasons". That's when a show is overrated, not because someone is stating their opinion when they are asked to explain it. Just saying, but I never asked for your opinion, since you posted first. Your opening post had lines in which you stated that Kimetsu is overrated and the community of said show is toxic, etc. At that point you didn't even know of my existence yet. Don't get me wrong, I subconsciously call shows bad all the time even though I know that there is no such thing as a truly bad show, only shows that worked for people and those that didn't. I merely mentioned it, because you came off as a jerk the way you phrased it and sounded sometimes like the pot calling the cattle black. I'm repeating myself here, but I know I do that more often subconsciously than I want to admit, but as long as we are able to admit that, we might be able to increase the general quality of discussions on that site, which would help everyone in the community having a better day. Quite honestly, I'm not active enough to have seen people do dickcontests on who is stronger. It is certainly a fun activity every once in a while as long as people stay civilized and only use facts, but like I said, haven't dealt enough with those groups of fans. thiago52192 said: THANK YOU! People like you give me hope in this community. The real problem of this situation, when the masses really start forcing their opinion that a show with a weak plot (a conclusion you can make by analyzing the plot without the influence of personal feelings or opinions) is the best thing ever, is that it is extremely disrespectful to other works that genuinely cared about making their plot good. People can like whatever they want. Hell, I don't care if a show like that is your favorite of all time. But wanting the show to be treated as some kind of masterpiece is pretty much saying a big "Fuck You!" to other works that clearly cared into making their story work. You might want to read the full conversation Armados and I just had, because you pretty much are being just as toxic as the other side there. You think that way precisely because you like the series. Once again, I didn't run towards Kimetsu communities saying "haha your show sucks X is way better fuck everything beneath it". That's what plenty of fans of other franchises do, I don't do that. I share my opinion with what I would define as "legitimate" reasons according to my own pespective, which is a solid way in my opinion. If people came to the right places, shared their opinion regarding how great Kimetsu is without literally trying to shove everywhere how they think Tanjirou is the greatest character ever made in anime I wouldn't have minded. But they do exactly that. They literally try to compare everything to Demon Slayer these days. People take Ninja's tweet regarding how he thinks Demon Slayer is the best anime ever made and treat it as a fact, trying to diss everything else. Its completely different from my approach, whether you like it or not. |
Oct 21, 2020 6:43 AM
#49
wape said: This. It also connotes "I'm not smart enough to communicate why I disliked it, so all I give you is this meaningless phrase. Please ignore my irrelevant opinion because of that.".all it means is "lots of other people liked it, but I didn't." |
Oct 21, 2020 6:57 AM
#50
Armados said: You think that way precisely because you like the series. Once again, I didn't run towards Kimetsu communities saying "haha your show sucks X is way better fuck everything beneath it". That's what plenty of fans of other franchises do, I don't do that. I share my opinion with what I would define as "legitimate" reasons according to my own pespective, which is a solid way in my opinion. If people came to the right places, shared their opinion regarding how great Kimetsu is without literally trying to shove everywhere how they think Tanjirou is the greatest character ever made in anime I wouldn't have minded. But they do exactly that. They literally try to compare everything to Demon Slayer these days. People take Ninja's tweet regarding how he thinks Demon Slayer is the best anime ever made and treat it as a fact, trying to diss everything else. Its completely different from my approach, whether you like it or not. Me liking or not liking a show doesn't change my opinion at all though. I would've said the exact same things if you would've talked that way about, I dunno, Ishuzoku Reviewers, which didn't work at all for me, or Ping Pong The Animation. All I'm really saying is that the way you write sounds like you are trying to establish pseudofacts about how the show is bad, when in reality it just didn't click with you for various reasons. And well, thats your taste, that is completely okay. I mean, if we all had the same taste, there would only be like 1 anime ever, and everyone would watch it. The problem is that you are not 'just stating your opinion' but indirectly insulting people about it, apparently without even realising you are doing that. And, like I already said multiple times, I know that all to well because I still do that way too often. Just look at my Ping Pong Review from 2014 if you want to see how much I'm right now being the pot calling the kettle. I don't personally think it is wrong to compare stuff, per se. Comparing is what allows us to analyse why some things work for us, while others absolutely didn't, and that way we figure out our own tastes. And to be perfectly honest, when I give scores for artstyle and animation quality, I usually go back to Kimetsu no Yaiba, because I think it stands unrivaled in terms of animation (before, that title would've gone to Fate/Zero). And who the f is Ninja? Isn't that some gamer dude? |
More topics from this board
» Waifu War V5 (Anniversary-Edition!) (Round 1) ( 1 2 3 4 )TheMinkalex - Sep 28 |
157 |
by NS2D
»»
4 minutes ago |
|
» Favorite stand from each JoJo part?Fukoku - 11 hours ago |
9 |
by KousakaK
»»
7 minutes ago |
|
» Any figures you would like to see as a Fate Servant?Fukoku - 12 hours ago |
22 |
by Captain-577
»»
10 minutes ago |
|
» what are your hot takes on anime? ( 1 2 )selfawarecorpse - Oct 4 |
69 |
by RainShift_2
»»
10 minutes ago |
|
» Do you think Anime make Manga look less charming sometimes?Absurdo_N - Yesterday |
13 |
by Duado
»»
13 minutes ago |