New
Jul 9, 2020 7:56 AM
#1
it seems to be a noticeable pairing if one listens to kpop, they are homosexual or bisexual yes, including females this must be a universal axiom, is it not? |
This topic has been locked and is no longer available for discussion.
Jul 9, 2020 8:00 AM
#2
I'd be chugging some hunk spunk now if it is. |
Jul 9, 2020 8:09 AM
#3
Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. |
Jul 9, 2020 8:12 AM
#4
No, but it does lower your testosterone significantly. |
Jul 9, 2020 8:19 AM
#5
yes. enjoyment of kpop is known to turn one into a /mu/fag which is the same as homosexual Luchse said: Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. too much tacticool crap. this is top form ak |
MEA·MENTVLA·INGENS·EST |
Jul 9, 2020 8:31 AM
#6
how is that different from watching anime though that have a lot of pretty boys too? lol? |
Jul 9, 2020 8:34 AM
#7
Looks like I will need to make my ‘lol k-pop playlist’ private on youtube. |
Jul 9, 2020 8:38 AM
#8
Theo1899 said: Did someone just mention tacticool?yes. enjoyment of kpop is known to turn one into a /mu/fag which is the same as homosexual Luchse said: Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. too much tacticool crap. this is top form ak Lux_Lucis said: It's not really an optional full auto because it used to be one right off the start until they knocked it down to burst and semi with M16A2 but later returned with A3 variant. 7.62 is trash and you know it. Far too heavy for a mass carry and inefficient after a spitting distance. Not to even mention how lacking it is on the armour piercing front. Not ventilated! Those are polymer mags with seen through holes.Luchse said: Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. >5.45 Not choosing the superior stopping power that the 7.62 offers. 5.NN are only better for longer ranges and semi-auto... Which is exactly where you Don't use an AK, which is a full-auto rifle with a semi-auto option, unlike the M16 which is a semi-auto rifle with an optional full-auto (look it up). AK is for close range full-auto. >Foregrip in the middle. Just no. >Ventilated mags. Jams Inc. Mag jams not system jams tho these are also more likely in an AK-74M when your mags load dirt instead of bullets. No, you don't actually keep track of bullets by looking in the holes. >Good muzzle brake. Ok, you can have that one. And no, Irons should be kept as an "Oh shit" not as primary sights. Get an EoTech holo. |
Jul 9, 2020 8:40 AM
#9
p0ckyy said: including females What a chad! The voice of resistance! Lol OT: somehow I’m still not into vaginas. Maybe I don’t listen to enough k-pop... |
Jul 9, 2020 8:43 AM
#10
It's gay only if you don't wear socks |
한 번만 살지만 제대로 하면 한 번이면 충분해요 |
Jul 9, 2020 8:46 AM
#11
What's really, hugely homosexual is getting a boner for discussing best guns instead of a boner for best anthropomorphic guns. |
Jul 9, 2020 8:55 AM
#12
I’ll say no, but you lose your sanity for listening to it. |
Jul 9, 2020 9:13 AM
#13
idk, I feel like I am growing chest hair just listening to this |
Jul 9, 2020 9:27 AM
#14
Lux_Lucis said: I'm talking about any scenario and not just 300m + in which 7.62 fails miserably. Ditch the mention of iron sight since it was a joke that you obviously took at face value. Not it does not penetrate armor considerably better. You don't know how 5.45 works if you think that it just makes its way through a target. I've presented you with a picture of what it does to a victim. The picture you so verily ignored. 7.62 is the one that punches holes and fails to do a sufficient amount of damage while 5.45 tumbles around making considerable amounts of most of the time unrepairable damage which is why it's called the poison bullet. No yawing makes it pretty much the only upside over 5.45.Luchse said: Theo1899 said: yes. enjoyment of kpop is known to turn one into a /mu/fag which is the same as homosexual Luchse said: Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. too much tacticool crap. this is top form ak Lux_Lucis said: Luchse said: Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. >5.45 Not choosing the superior stopping power that the 7.62 offers. 5.NN are only better for longer ranges and semi-auto... Which is exactly where you Don't use an AK, which is a full-auto rifle with a semi-auto option, unlike the M16 which is a semi-auto rifle with an optional full-auto (look it up). AK is for close range full-auto. >Foregrip in the middle. Just no. >Ventilated mags. Jams Inc. Mag jams not system jams tho these are also more likely in an AK-74M when your mags load dirt instead of bullets. No, you don't actually keep track of bullets by looking in the holes. >Good muzzle brake. Ok, you can have that one. And no, Irons should be kept as an "Oh shit" not as primary sights. Get an EoTech holo. You're talking about 300m + scenario lol. You're not using your K past 100 meter anyway. Especially not with iron sights. Not in any real world scenario. Now if we look at the proper application of the system (CQC): The kinetic energy of a 7.62 is monstrous compared to that of a 5.45. It penetrates armor considerably better. Any kind of armor. It also turns the armor on the one wearing it. If 5.45 punches through and gets out, 7.62 becomes a souvenir that effectively expanded the steel plate into the wearer / turned the ceramic plate into powder and knives. The stopping power is an enourmous factor in CQC. If a 5.45 can get in and out, a person running at you can take several, reach you, stab you... and live to tell about it. 7.62 will simply Push him back. 7.62 in CQC is also superior due to reduced tumbling. Shooting it in greenery or through thin walls does not turn it into random projectiles. The only real advantage of a 5.45 in CQC is the fact that you can carry almost double the amount. I'm not talking about the history. I'm talking about the engineering. The trigger mechanism. Well if these are windows, not holes, then have that too. Still a useless gimmick, tho. |
Jul 9, 2020 10:15 AM
#15
I can confirm this because I listened to K-Pop once and I'm also bisexual so your theory is correct |
If life ain't just a joke Then why are we laughing? If life ain't just a joke Then why am I dead? |
Jul 9, 2020 10:16 AM
#16
Listening to Britney Spears (close enough) at the moment, yet I don't feel compelled to bash boy booty. (Chauvinistic pigs.) |
Jul 9, 2020 10:18 AM
#17
Lux_Lucis said: Left is PS ball while the right is 7n6 also known as the most widely available ammunitions of each caliber.Luchse said: Lux_Lucis said: Luchse said: Theo1899 said: Did someone just mention tacticool?yes. enjoyment of kpop is known to turn one into a /mu/fag which is the same as homosexual Luchse said: Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. too much tacticool crap. this is top form ak Lux_Lucis said: It's not really an optional full auto because it used to be one right off the start until they knocked it down to burst and semi with M16A2 but later returned with A3 variant. 7.62 is trash and you know it. Far too heavy for a mass carry and inefficient after a spitting distance. Not to even mention how lacking it is on the armour piercing front. Not ventilated! Those are polymer mags with seen through holes.Luchse said: Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. >5.45 Not choosing the superior stopping power that the 7.62 offers. 5.NN are only better for longer ranges and semi-auto... Which is exactly where you Don't use an AK, which is a full-auto rifle with a semi-auto option, unlike the M16 which is a semi-auto rifle with an optional full-auto (look it up). AK is for close range full-auto. >Foregrip in the middle. Just no. >Ventilated mags. Jams Inc. Mag jams not system jams tho these are also more likely in an AK-74M when your mags load dirt instead of bullets. No, you don't actually keep track of bullets by looking in the holes. >Good muzzle brake. Ok, you can have that one. And no, Irons should be kept as an "Oh shit" not as primary sights. Get an EoTech holo. You're talking about 300m + scenario lol. You're not using your K past 100 meter anyway. Especially not with iron sights. Not in any real world scenario. Now if we look at the proper application of the system (CQC): The kinetic energy of a 7.62 is monstrous compared to that of a 5.45. It penetrates armor considerably better. Any kind of armor. It also turns the armor on the one wearing it. If 5.45 punches through and gets out, 7.62 becomes a souvenir that effectively expanded the steel plate into the wearer / turned the ceramic plate into powder and knives. The stopping power is an enourmous factor in CQC. If a 5.45 can get in and out, a person running at you can take several, reach you, stab you... and live to tell about it. 7.62 will simply Push him back. 7.62 in CQC is also superior due to reduced tumbling. Shooting it in greenery or through thin walls does not turn it into random projectiles. The only real advantage of a 5.45 in CQC is the fact that you can carry almost double the amount. I'm not talking about the history. I'm talking about the engineering. The trigger mechanism. Well if these are windows, not holes, then have that too. Still a useless gimmick, tho. A pic with no context. In ballistic gel. That we don't know the quality of. Ofc I'd ignore that? Pls the "Poison Bullet" is an afghan myth. They simply had no treatment for these wounds because it was the 1st time they were getting shot by them. 5.56 is more "poisonous". Non fragmenting 5.45 are ok but fragmenting 5.45 are among the most inferior of them all. Also in close range the 5.45 is too high speed to impart any significant energy outside its bullet path. 7.62 almost always fragments at ranges lower than 100m, and when no fragmenting the exist hole is always horrendous compared to 5.45. Also by transferring a huge portion of its energy to the body it hits, it stays inside the body more often than a 5.45. Your too high velocity argument renders even 5.56 as useless. Think you that one of the most common cartridges used in military today are used because they're simply useless? 5.45 does not fragment because it has a thicker jacket unlike 5.56. I've shown you a picture of an exit hole and you're still telling the opposite. I even told you that the opposite is the case when it comes to energy transfer... It's fairly obvious that your knowledge about ammunitions doesn't surpass your regular google search. |
Jul 9, 2020 10:39 AM
#18
Lux_Lucis said: Pls, there's nothing more straight than listening to my K poppin'. hey alright this was pretty good :^) |
Jul 9, 2020 10:57 AM
#19
Lux_Lucis said: https://youtu.be/-Oq3ZEZ7YFw https://youtu.be/weBVufFXJbULuchse said: Lux_Lucis said: Luchse said: Lux_Lucis said: I'm talking about any scenario and not just 300m + in which 7.62 fails miserably. Ditch the mention of iron sight since it was a joke that you obviously took at face value. Not it does not penetrate armor considerably better. You don't know how 5.45 works if you think that it just makes its way through a target. I've presented you with a picture of what it does to a victim. The picture you so verily ignored. 7.62 is the one that punches holes and fails to do a sufficient amount of damage while 5.45 tumbles around making considerable amounts of most of the time unrepairable damage which is why it's called the poison bullet. No yawing makes it pretty much the only upside over 5.45.Luchse said: Theo1899 said: Did someone just mention tacticool?yes. enjoyment of kpop is known to turn one into a /mu/fag which is the same as homosexual Luchse said: Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. too much tacticool crap. this is top form ak Lux_Lucis said: It's not really an optional full auto because it used to be one right off the start until they knocked it down to burst and semi with M16A2 but later returned with A3 variant. 7.62 is trash and you know it. Far too heavy for a mass carry and inefficient after a spitting distance. Not to even mention how lacking it is on the armour piercing front. Not ventilated! Those are polymer mags with seen through holes.Luchse said: Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. >5.45 Not choosing the superior stopping power that the 7.62 offers. 5.NN are only better for longer ranges and semi-auto... Which is exactly where you Don't use an AK, which is a full-auto rifle with a semi-auto option, unlike the M16 which is a semi-auto rifle with an optional full-auto (look it up). AK is for close range full-auto. >Foregrip in the middle. Just no. >Ventilated mags. Jams Inc. Mag jams not system jams tho these are also more likely in an AK-74M when your mags load dirt instead of bullets. No, you don't actually keep track of bullets by looking in the holes. >Good muzzle brake. Ok, you can have that one. And no, Irons should be kept as an "Oh shit" not as primary sights. Get an EoTech holo. You're talking about 300m + scenario lol. You're not using your K past 100 meter anyway. Especially not with iron sights. Not in any real world scenario. Now if we look at the proper application of the system (CQC): The kinetic energy of a 7.62 is monstrous compared to that of a 5.45. It penetrates armor considerably better. Any kind of armor. It also turns the armor on the one wearing it. If 5.45 punches through and gets out, 7.62 becomes a souvenir that effectively expanded the steel plate into the wearer / turned the ceramic plate into powder and knives. The stopping power is an enourmous factor in CQC. If a 5.45 can get in and out, a person running at you can take several, reach you, stab you... and live to tell about it. 7.62 will simply Push him back. 7.62 in CQC is also superior due to reduced tumbling. Shooting it in greenery or through thin walls does not turn it into random projectiles. The only real advantage of a 5.45 in CQC is the fact that you can carry almost double the amount. I'm not talking about the history. I'm talking about the engineering. The trigger mechanism. Well if these are windows, not holes, then have that too. Still a useless gimmick, tho. A pic with no context. In ballistic gel. That we don't know the quality of. Ofc I'd ignore that? Pls the "Poison Bullet" is an afghan myth. They simply had no treatment for these wounds because it was the 1st time they were getting shot by them. 5.56 is more "poisonous". Non fragmenting 5.45 are ok but fragmenting 5.45 are among the most inferior of them all. Also in close range the 5.45 is too high speed to impart any significant energy outside its bullet path. 7.62 almost always fragments at ranges lower than 100m, and when no fragmenting the exist hole is always horrendous compared to 5.45. Also by transferring a huge portion of its energy to the body it hits, it stays inside the body more often than a 5.45. Your too high velocity argument renders even 5.56 as useless. Think you that one of the most common cartridges used in military today are used because they're simply useless? 5.45 does not fragment because it has a thicker jacket unlike 5.56. I've shown you a picture of an exit hole and you're still telling the opposite. I even told you that the opposite is the case when it comes to energy transfer... It's fairly obvious that your knowledge about ammunitions doesn't surpass your regular google search. Distance? Weapon system? Gel quality? Tip type? Pls :> What you said and I addressed is wrong tho... >Most widely used. Not relevant. The most widely used anything is not the best something, especially not for every possible job. |
Jul 9, 2020 11:10 AM
#20
No, it makes you alpha. Everyone knows this. -hmm cute k-pop boy, I'll make him my pfp |
Jul 9, 2020 11:17 AM
#21
Kpop female artists does make me feel some type of way. |
caprisanAug 10, 2020 12:44 PM
just wanna feel wanted by someone other than the police 😫 |
Jul 9, 2020 11:30 AM
#22
How long will it take people to realise that the only thing that makes you gay is being attracted to the same gender. Not your hobbies and your interests and ect. I dont think its such a hard concept to grasp. |
Jul 9, 2020 11:41 AM
#23
If you are a guy: Yes. Fapping to feminine korean boys is certainly homosexual. And there probably isn't any other reason to listen to the music - besides liking the guys. (I mean the music itself is bad ha ha.) |
Jul 9, 2020 11:42 AM
#24
Yes. It is indeed homosexual to listen to kpop. |
Jul 9, 2020 12:53 PM
#25
Your hobbies have nothing to do with ur sexuality lmao. And if u ask me, no, I don't listen to kpop but I found most Korean guys very attractive and I love them. |
BANZAI NIPPON. Nippon is the Land of freedom. Nippon is the Land of Peace. Nippon is the Land of Justice and Prosperity. In Nippon, we trust. We love Nippon, we love Anime. Anime love us, Nippon love us. 日本 |
Jul 9, 2020 12:56 PM
#26
Lux_Lucis said: Holy shiet man I give up. Not even going to bother reading this. I literally pointed out facts just for you to waltz in and say no it's opposite.Luchse said: Lux_Lucis said: Luchse said: Lux_Lucis said: Left is PS ball while the right is 7n6 also known as the most widely available ammunitions of each caliber.Luchse said: Lux_Lucis said: I'm talking about any scenario and not just 300m + in which 7.62 fails miserably. Ditch the mention of iron sight since it was a joke that you obviously took at face value. Not it does not penetrate armor considerably better. You don't know how 5.45 works if you think that it just makes its way through a target. I've presented you with a picture of what it does to a victim. The picture you so verily ignored. 7.62 is the one that punches holes and fails to do a sufficient amount of damage while 5.45 tumbles around making considerable amounts of most of the time unrepairable damage which is why it's called the poison bullet. No yawing makes it pretty much the only upside over 5.45.Luchse said: Theo1899 said: Did someone just mention tacticool?yes. enjoyment of kpop is known to turn one into a /mu/fag which is the same as homosexual Luchse said: Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. too much tacticool crap. this is top form ak Lux_Lucis said: It's not really an optional full auto because it used to be one right off the start until they knocked it down to burst and semi with M16A2 but later returned with A3 variant. 7.62 is trash and you know it. Far too heavy for a mass carry and inefficient after a spitting distance. Not to even mention how lacking it is on the armour piercing front. Not ventilated! Those are polymer mags with seen through holes.Luchse said: Oh no what have you done with my baby... This is how AK ought to look like. Chad iron sights over scopes any day of the week. >5.45 Not choosing the superior stopping power that the 7.62 offers. 5.NN are only better for longer ranges and semi-auto... Which is exactly where you Don't use an AK, which is a full-auto rifle with a semi-auto option, unlike the M16 which is a semi-auto rifle with an optional full-auto (look it up). AK is for close range full-auto. >Foregrip in the middle. Just no. >Ventilated mags. Jams Inc. Mag jams not system jams tho these are also more likely in an AK-74M when your mags load dirt instead of bullets. No, you don't actually keep track of bullets by looking in the holes. >Good muzzle brake. Ok, you can have that one. And no, Irons should be kept as an "Oh shit" not as primary sights. Get an EoTech holo. You're talking about 300m + scenario lol. You're not using your K past 100 meter anyway. Especially not with iron sights. Not in any real world scenario. Now if we look at the proper application of the system (CQC): The kinetic energy of a 7.62 is monstrous compared to that of a 5.45. It penetrates armor considerably better. Any kind of armor. It also turns the armor on the one wearing it. If 5.45 punches through and gets out, 7.62 becomes a souvenir that effectively expanded the steel plate into the wearer / turned the ceramic plate into powder and knives. The stopping power is an enourmous factor in CQC. If a 5.45 can get in and out, a person running at you can take several, reach you, stab you... and live to tell about it. 7.62 will simply Push him back. 7.62 in CQC is also superior due to reduced tumbling. Shooting it in greenery or through thin walls does not turn it into random projectiles. The only real advantage of a 5.45 in CQC is the fact that you can carry almost double the amount. I'm not talking about the history. I'm talking about the engineering. The trigger mechanism. Well if these are windows, not holes, then have that too. Still a useless gimmick, tho. A pic with no context. In ballistic gel. That we don't know the quality of. Ofc I'd ignore that? Pls the "Poison Bullet" is an afghan myth. They simply had no treatment for these wounds because it was the 1st time they were getting shot by them. 5.56 is more "poisonous". Non fragmenting 5.45 are ok but fragmenting 5.45 are among the most inferior of them all. Also in close range the 5.45 is too high speed to impart any significant energy outside its bullet path. 7.62 almost always fragments at ranges lower than 100m, and when no fragmenting the exist hole is always horrendous compared to 5.45. Also by transferring a huge portion of its energy to the body it hits, it stays inside the body more often than a 5.45. Your too high velocity argument renders even 5.56 as useless. Think you that one of the most common cartridges used in military today are used because they're simply useless? 5.45 does not fragment because it has a thicker jacket unlike 5.56. I've shown you a picture of an exit hole and you're still telling the opposite. I even told you that the opposite is the case when it comes to energy transfer... It's fairly obvious that your knowledge about ammunitions doesn't surpass your regular google search. Distance? Weapon system? Gel quality? Tip type? Pls :> What you said and I addressed is wrong tho... >Most widely used. Not relevant. The most widely used anything is not the best something, especially not for every possible job. Again more ballistic gel... Couch science. This gel Roughly simulates only (!) Muscle tissue. Fat tissue, viscera and bone behave nothing like that. You don't have 12 inch muscles bruh. Unless you're shooting Marcus Ruhl these vids are meaningless. Don't even watch them lol. Plus there's no info about weapon system nor distance. Just the speed and weight which gives you the impact linear momentum is far from being the only factor that determines a bullet's behavior even in gelatin. The 7.62 is also a specific (and cheap) US ammo. The center of mass will vary even among the bullets in the same box. What happens when you shoot someone with a surplus 7.62, with shitty coating, from a Russian AK is this: It hits a bone, discharges a retarded amount of kinetic energy and fragments. Whatever exits leaves a hole big enough to stick a fist inside, whatever stays becomes a nasty souvenir. With crappy protection 7.62 becomes something akin to a shotgun from hell. A 5.45 does a fraction of that damage. Hitting a bone makes it slow down a lot, it does some traveling through tissue and if it exits you can stick 2 fingers inside. The traveling is nasty but not as nasty as 5.56. If a 5.45 fragments it loses all force and stops. While it tumbles it's ok damage-wise but is not comparable to 7.62. Hitting fat and viscera, with low amounts of muscle, the 5.45 goes in and out without any of that cool drama tumbling leaving sharing none of that sweet kinetic energy. 7.62 is generous tho and fat/viscera only amplifies its effects. Edit: Oh and I've just noticed the "knowledge limited to google search". Sorry I'm cooking. No. It's not :> I shot and was shot. Initial training 1 year and 2 months. 2 more years of service in active conflict zones. 8 more months of total service in reserves. I shot every gun that Israel has to offer including ones that are not on the market yet :> I'm not even a youtube gun scientist tho :< |
Jul 9, 2020 12:58 PM
#27
nah, homosexuality implies that you're interested in real people |
Jul 9, 2020 1:10 PM
#28
Thinking a culture is attractive doesn't change your sexual orientation, but okay. Kpop artists are put in the industry to look attractive on camera. I could be straight and find the girls hot, or I could be lesbian and find the guys hot. Aesthetic is different from romantic/sexual. But ehh, I'd say it's to do with how androgynous many can look. |
BunilleJul 9, 2020 1:13 PM
Jul 9, 2020 1:13 PM
#29
Bunille said: what if the kpop "culture" is just an industry marketed towards a certain sexual preferenceThinking a culture is attractive doesn't change your sexual orientation, but okay. |
Jul 9, 2020 1:15 PM
#30
Short answer, no it isn't. The only thing that officially makes you gay is being in love with a man. |
I CELEBRATE myself, And what I assume you shall assume, For every atom belonging to me as good belongs to you. |
Jul 9, 2020 1:20 PM
#31
hverfa said: Explain to me how it's marketed to bisexual/gay people and not straight people?Bunille said: what if the kpop "culture" is just an industry marketed towards a certain sexual preferenceThinking a culture is attractive doesn't change your sexual orientation, but okay. |
Jul 9, 2020 5:36 PM
#32
Bunille said: i'm not referring to kpophverfa said: Explain to me how it's marketed to bisexual/gay people and not straight people?Bunille said: Thinking a culture is attractive doesn't change your sexual orientation, but okay. just your argument in general lol |
Jul 9, 2020 5:42 PM
#33
^With the kpop scene (at least mainstream) being predominantly boy/girl bands who sing about overall same topics, it's safe to say that they're catering to a specific demographic, so you're right in a way. Though even with that, I feel like music is music and if what I listen to completely defines who I am, idk what my Playboi Carti marathons would say about me when it's not the norm when it comes to me lmao Some more lowkey groups like ADOY are really good though. |
Jul 9, 2020 6:00 PM
#34
Jul 9, 2020 6:09 PM
#35
Seijatachiiii said: How long will it take people to realise that the only thing that makes you gay is being attracted to the same gender. Not your hobbies and your interests and ect. I dont think its such a hard concept to grasp. Yes, but what can possibly make someone begin to be attracted to the same gender? That is the question. |
“Right is right even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.” ― Saint Augustine |
Jul 9, 2020 6:52 PM
#36
No, it's just a sign you're annoying as fuck. |
"No, son, you may not have your body pillow at the dinner table!" |
Jul 9, 2020 9:38 PM
#37
Probably, the only time I’ve ever felt attracted to another man is when I heard some K-pop once, so there might be a correlation. |
Jul 9, 2020 10:40 PM
#38
Yeah definitely. The rise of homosexuality is definitely linked to how popular kpop has gotten lately |
Jul 9, 2020 10:41 PM
#39
Well. I'm gay and I listened to K-Pop once, so yeah that's right. |
Jul 10, 2020 12:13 AM
#40
@hverfa it’s not even an argument. Did I use the wrong word? What I meant was the Kpop industry, and basically anything I edited my first comment to. |
Jul 10, 2020 9:03 AM
#41
No. If anything, K-pop brings the heterosexual out of me |
Jul 10, 2020 11:54 AM
#43
This thread will be locked as it does not adhere to Casual Discussion Rule #7. The rule states: Controversial/sensitive topics liable to incite rule violations (trolling, flaming, abuse) are no longer allowed. Please use the Current Events board for new developments in these topics, and follow the board rules there. This includes, but is not limited to, topics which: a. aim to profile/stereotype, or question the legitimacy of, people based on their gender, sexual orientation, race, xenophobia, religion, etc. Please ensure future topics abide by the rules. |
This topic has been locked and is no longer available for discussion.
More topics from this board
» Do the well-known stereotypes associated with people from your country actually apply to you? ( 1 2 )fleurbleue - Oct 8 |
77 |
by Auron
»»
10 minutes ago |
|
» are there any "Hikikomori" here like me? ( 1 2 )Ymir_The_Viking - Oct 11 |
66 |
by _Mazino
»»
11 minutes ago |
|
» china crossdresser are so cute omg!!!Ymir_The_Viking - 7 hours ago |
25 |
by Zarutaku
»»
18 minutes ago |
|
» All of you who learned English as a 2nd language, is your accent clear or thick?fleurbleue - Yesterday |
40 |
by -Shinzo
»»
27 minutes ago |
|
» If anime/manga are the only mediums you consume, how much are you missing?thewiru - 11 hours ago |
29 |
by LoveYourSmile
»»
42 minutes ago |