are you pr or anti censorship

JKKH said:
I'm anti all censorship too. Even for things that are really controversial or horrific.If you don't like something then just don't subject yourself to it. Simple as that. No need to ban things.

Neane93 said:
The IRA did nothing wrong.

................

Neane93 said:

You say "muh freedoms" but have a bunch of videos on your profile that idolize sectarian terrorists who killed men, women, and children because they were Irish. The IRA on the other hand weren't sectarian and gave warnings if they were gonna bomb a place that had civilians.

Neane93 said:
Th UVF paramilitary in Northern Ireland killed far more civilians than the IRA ever did and the Shankill bomb was to wipe out a UDA command center. The UDA were completely savage and killed anyone Irish they could find.

Neane93 said:


As a rule the IRA never tried to kill civilians if possible (hence warnings if bombing civilian places. But they didn't give warnings if they were bombing Loyalists or British Government), there were groups such as the "Republican Action Force", "South Armagh Republican Action Force" and "Catholic Reaction Force" for example who had no problem killing civilians but they never got any legitimacy from the Army Council and most likely was that.

I think accidentally killing people to stop an organization that is savagely carrying out ethnic cleansing is forgivable.

Bobby2Hands said:
Are you really expecting anyone on MAL to be pro censorship?

DateYutaka said:
people like @spyrocoot are pro censorship an i odnt understand why

cansoorship take any your Civil liberties

spyrocoot said:


That is not true. You claimed that because I support Conservatives in the upcoming election that it is akin to supporting censorship. That is not a good argument. I already explained in a different thread why a Labour Government lead by Corbyn would be a disaster for Britain.

- Corbyn is in a weak negotiating position with the EU, having promised that there would be a deal. May, meanwhile, made it clear that no deal is better than a bad deal. We need a hard Brexit, not Corbyn's soft Brexit.
- Corbyn defended people who joined and fought with ISIS against the British, as well as anti-West hate preachers.
- Corbyn's position became untenable when he implied that he would never push the button re: Trident. The country would be under threat the moment he gets in.
- Abbott, the Shadow Home Secretary and prospective Vice PM, is unbelievable inept at her job. She plucks figures out of thin air and doesn't seem to have any understanding of macroeconomics. Let alone that she plans to wipe all finger prints/background information on known terrorists and terror suspects.
- Corbyn's "fully costed manifesto" has a massive black hole in it, according to the IFS. Won't be able to afford what he's promising without massive borrowing and increases to income tax and corporation tax.
- Corbyn is a charlatan, someone who plays up to his image as "the people's man" when leaked CCTV footage from Virgin Trains showed him for the fraud that he is. To go to such lengths just to push his agenda (that railways should be made public again) has only made him look more pathetic.
- Corbyn wants uncontrolled immigration. We already have enough non-EU migrants who have become a burden on the state, we don't need any more.
- People will actually be less well off in a Labour Government than they would a Tory one. See:

http://news.sky.com/story/general-election-2017-which-of-the-parties-will-make-you-richer-10907271

Listen to me, young man; if voting Tory is the equivalent of supporting censorship, then voting Labour is the equivalent of supporting terrorism, uncontrolled migration, weak leadership, rising unemployment and a clusterfuck of an economy.

ThatRazorGuy said:
Very staunchly against it. Governments can and have used it as a tool to stifle dissent and hide injustices on their part.

DateYutaka said:



may is pro saudi were did mist of 9/11 hyjacker come from again were is wahabsim the state doctrine [ that 99% of muisim terror group subsrice to]

lol may back terrorist with money


may's net regulation is video nasties 2.0 but worse i know for fatc that atere are so cal video nasties that have still not had uk relese osme 30 yera later in there proper form

this is video nties reguation plus snopper chaher on roids if that not pro censirship that than what is

the orys want 1984 enacted and yoour o with that

cuase muh commies under the bed my god you may be older than i but you mind is in the cold war not in modern times

the net atlesr outside of china and soon the uk is the last bastion of free true
speach

and plus labour are pro union so pro worker the toryies will never be Battle of Orgreave anyone the uk has some of most punitive union laws in the world im sorry they are not pro worker

abhutrash said:
Man, I know nothing of the politics surrounding this argument, since I'm a dumb American with a tangerine as a president, but spyrocoot is able to coherently create paragraphs with concise points, whereas...you aren't. You should probably give up on your random vendetta before you make a real fool of yourself and discredit the very platform you are trying to defend.

DateYutaka said:


so you attack the free speech and net nutality advocate like me

byakugami said:
Holy shit, you came really, really close to making an actual English sentence there. I'd say you did at least as well as the average inner-city kid could.

DateYutaka said:


im a advocate and people who are oign to vote tory are not like @spyrocoot are not es ok for the nation internet to become like china and kill the fre flow of infomation and alos kill Civil liberties i od not know what ot say

abhutrash said:
Oh my, I haven't had a laugh that good for a while. Thanks @byakugami

Seriously though, do you enjoy your flimsy ability to take anything someone says and turn it around to be proof of your point? My comment was a suggestion from one user to another. I have no intention of silencing you in any shape or form. All I'm trying to get across is the fact that sound reasoning and an education past your typical 12 year old will take you a long way in trying to convey a message. Perhaps consider focusing on expanding your knowledge and comprehension skills, then maybe you will be able to actually not look like an utter fool next to spyrocoot.

(Also, can't tell if you're a troll or not. Keep at it either way, I'm having a blast. xD)