New
What did you think of this episode?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this episode. If you want to discuss future events or theories, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Apr 30, 2016 9:01 AM
#151
Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: I feel like this show got a bad rep early on and now people are just blindly not giving it a chance. It manages to keep me entertained and always ends the episode in a compelling cliffhanger that makes you want to see what happens next. And those should be considered some of the hallmarks of a good mystery show. A cliffhanger is compelling by nature. It's a lazy plot device used by bad writers who can't write a show that is interesting on it's own, so they show half of an important event in one episode and then just put the other half in the next episode so you have to watch it. Cliffhangers are a hallmark of a bad mystery. Beyond that, the character logic is redundant and contradictory, not to mention stupid. The cast is generic and shallow, and the show has more characters than it knows what to do with. The dialogue is B-movie bad. Like, The Room bad. "I see dead people." I had to pause and bury my face in my hand for a few minutes. My god. "I actually see people who are going to die." So do I. Every single day. What a retarded line. A cliffhanger is not a "lazy plot device" it has been used in countless classic works of literature dating back hundreds of years. The cast is shallow because many of them (I assume) are merely there to die, to be cannon fodder. They don't have time to develop nearly 30 characters in a mere 12 episodes so the characters have to be super tropey so we can immediately know their personalities. "I see dead people" is a line from The Sixth Sense, a critically acclaimed movie. Now sit back down you philistine :p First of all, I'd like you to name a single acclaimed literary work that employs cliffhangers. Second, the point is that they shouldn't have had 30 characters in the first place, or if they did, they shouldn't have tried to give all of them equal screen time and also take a quarter of the first episode to establish who they are and what their motivations are. We don't need to see what every single character is doing because it doesn't matter. You don't need personalities for what eventually amount to fodder. However, this show decides to place emphasis on this point, leading to an incredibly underdeveloped main cast. It also wastes screen time and leads to this show moving along at a snail's pace. Third, I know it's from the Sixth Sense. That doesn't make it a good line. It's oddly placed, lacking contextually, and on top of that it's stolen from a better work. If I made a show where the characters had no dialogue except quotes from various critically acclaimed films, would that mean I wrote a work of genius? No, it'd be a shallow, shitty, extremely derivative work, sort of like this show. Dickens, Caroll, Shelley and Poe all used cliffhangers in their works. Battle Royale had around 30 characters on a bus, most of whom had little character and were only ever intended to die, and that's hailed as a classic I agree it was a bad line, but so what? Did it really destroy the show for you. |
Apr 30, 2016 9:02 AM
#152
| Lovepon needs to go. She was annoying this episode. Hopefully her backstory will shed some light on why she is like that though. That giant penguin looking thing at the end though.. O.O |
Apr 30, 2016 9:03 AM
#153
| Dude, what the hell? o_O That ending caught me off guard. I guess I didn't miss anything so far, since people here seem to be confused as well. |
Apr 30, 2016 9:29 AM
#154
Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: I feel like this show got a bad rep early on and now people are just blindly not giving it a chance. It manages to keep me entertained and always ends the episode in a compelling cliffhanger that makes you want to see what happens next. And those should be considered some of the hallmarks of a good mystery show. A cliffhanger is compelling by nature. It's a lazy plot device used by bad writers who can't write a show that is interesting on it's own, so they show half of an important event in one episode and then just put the other half in the next episode so you have to watch it. Cliffhangers are a hallmark of a bad mystery. Beyond that, the character logic is redundant and contradictory, not to mention stupid. The cast is generic and shallow, and the show has more characters than it knows what to do with. The dialogue is B-movie bad. Like, The Room bad. "I see dead people." I had to pause and bury my face in my hand for a few minutes. My god. "I actually see people who are going to die." So do I. Every single day. What a retarded line. A cliffhanger is not a "lazy plot device" it has been used in countless classic works of literature dating back hundreds of years. The cast is shallow because many of them (I assume) are merely there to die, to be cannon fodder. They don't have time to develop nearly 30 characters in a mere 12 episodes so the characters have to be super tropey so we can immediately know their personalities. "I see dead people" is a line from The Sixth Sense, a critically acclaimed movie. Now sit back down you philistine :p First of all, I'd like you to name a single acclaimed literary work that employs cliffhangers. Second, the point is that they shouldn't have had 30 characters in the first place, or if they did, they shouldn't have tried to give all of them equal screen time and also take a quarter of the first episode to establish who they are and what their motivations are. We don't need to see what every single character is doing because it doesn't matter. You don't need personalities for what eventually amount to fodder. However, this show decides to place emphasis on this point, leading to an incredibly underdeveloped main cast. It also wastes screen time and leads to this show moving along at a snail's pace. Third, I know it's from the Sixth Sense. That doesn't make it a good line. It's oddly placed, lacking contextually, and on top of that it's stolen from a better work. If I made a show where the characters had no dialogue except quotes from various critically acclaimed films, would that mean I wrote a work of genius? No, it'd be a shallow, shitty, extremely derivative work, sort of like this show. Dickens, Caroll, Shelley and Poe all used cliffhangers in their works. Battle Royale had around 30 characters on a bus, most of whom had little character and were only ever intended to die, and that's hailed as a classic I agree it was a bad line, but so what? Did it really destroy the show for you. First of all, I said name a work. You haven't done that. Beyond that, a cliffhanger in an episodic work such as this cannot even be compared to literary works with no intention of continuation. Those works utilize ambiguity to allow the reader to come to his own conclusion analytically or to further the central dogma of the novel. None of them end halfway through an event, making it necessary to read David Copperfield 2: Electric Boogaloo to figure out what happens next. Beyond that, these cliffhangers aren't even well executed. Most of them are simply forgotten about or swept under the rug in the next episode before moving on to something else. Oh yeah, that one dude was floating in the river. Better go look for him for about five minutes, then go back to the camp to argue some more. Second, Battle Royale is a film that does exactly what I described: It doesn't have to show what every single character is doing at every single moment. Beyond that, it's fodder characters still manage to develop a decent amount of depth in their limited screen time, and enough of the film is dedicated to the main cast that their characterization doesn't suffer. Mayoiga does none of this. As I've mentioned, having a large cast can be done well if handled by a competent director who can manage his characters. Unfortunately for Mayoiga, the director is neither capable of handling a large cast, nor even remotely competent. Third, no one line did not ruin the show for me. The rest of them did though. That was simply an example of the horrible dialogue that pervades every single scene of this show. There was also the characters, the visual design, the opening, the plot progression, and the character logic. All of it is piss poor and all of it ruins the show. |
| This is man's ultimate fighting machine. The synthetic life form know as Evangelion, Unit 01. Built here in secret, it is mankind’s last hope. |
Apr 30, 2016 9:54 AM
#155
| I think the one thing I do enjoy about this series is that I can imagine these people gathering from an internet forum. So when I read comments on the series I try to cast the posters as one of the characters. :P Aside from that, yeah, the way pretty much everyone is acting has me just rolling my eyes and desperately hoping something awful does happen. |
![]() |
Apr 30, 2016 10:02 AM
#156
Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: I feel like this show got a bad rep early on and now people are just blindly not giving it a chance. It manages to keep me entertained and always ends the episode in a compelling cliffhanger that makes you want to see what happens next. And those should be considered some of the hallmarks of a good mystery show. A cliffhanger is compelling by nature. It's a lazy plot device used by bad writers who can't write a show that is interesting on it's own, so they show half of an important event in one episode and then just put the other half in the next episode so you have to watch it. Cliffhangers are a hallmark of a bad mystery. Beyond that, the character logic is redundant and contradictory, not to mention stupid. The cast is generic and shallow, and the show has more characters than it knows what to do with. The dialogue is B-movie bad. Like, The Room bad. "I see dead people." I had to pause and bury my face in my hand for a few minutes. My god. "I actually see people who are going to die." So do I. Every single day. What a retarded line. A cliffhanger is not a "lazy plot device" it has been used in countless classic works of literature dating back hundreds of years. The cast is shallow because many of them (I assume) are merely there to die, to be cannon fodder. They don't have time to develop nearly 30 characters in a mere 12 episodes so the characters have to be super tropey so we can immediately know their personalities. "I see dead people" is a line from The Sixth Sense, a critically acclaimed movie. Now sit back down you philistine :p First of all, I'd like you to name a single acclaimed literary work that employs cliffhangers. Second, the point is that they shouldn't have had 30 characters in the first place, or if they did, they shouldn't have tried to give all of them equal screen time and also take a quarter of the first episode to establish who they are and what their motivations are. We don't need to see what every single character is doing because it doesn't matter. You don't need personalities for what eventually amount to fodder. However, this show decides to place emphasis on this point, leading to an incredibly underdeveloped main cast. It also wastes screen time and leads to this show moving along at a snail's pace. Third, I know it's from the Sixth Sense. That doesn't make it a good line. It's oddly placed, lacking contextually, and on top of that it's stolen from a better work. If I made a show where the characters had no dialogue except quotes from various critically acclaimed films, would that mean I wrote a work of genius? No, it'd be a shallow, shitty, extremely derivative work, sort of like this show. Dickens, Caroll, Shelley and Poe all used cliffhangers in their works. Battle Royale had around 30 characters on a bus, most of whom had little character and were only ever intended to die, and that's hailed as a classic I agree it was a bad line, but so what? Did it really destroy the show for you. First of all, I said name a work. You haven't done that. Beyond that, a cliffhanger in an episodic work such as this cannot even be compared to literary works with no intention of continuation. Those works utilize ambiguity to allow the reader to come to his own conclusion analytically or to further the central dogma of the novel. None of them end halfway through an event, making it necessary to read David Copperfield 2: Electric Boogaloo to figure out what happens next. Beyond that, these cliffhangers aren't even well executed. Most of them are simply forgotten about or swept under the rug in the next episode before moving on to something else. Oh yeah, that one dude was floating in the river. Better go look for him for about five minutes, then go back to the camp to argue some more. Second, Battle Royale is a film that does exactly what I described: It doesn't have to show what every single character is doing at every single moment. Beyond that, it's fodder characters still manage to develop a decent amount of depth in their limited screen time, and enough of the film is dedicated to the main cast that their characterization doesn't suffer. Mayoiga does none of this. As I've mentioned, having a large cast can be done well if handled by a competent director who can manage his characters. Unfortunately for Mayoiga, the director is neither capable of handling a large cast, nor even remotely competent. Third, no one line did not ruin the show for me. The rest of them did though. That was simply an example of the horrible dialogue that pervades every single scene of this show. There was also the characters, the visual design, the opening, the plot progression, and the character logic. All of it is piss poor and all of it ruins the show. Do you actually want me to sit there and name works by these authors? well fine, Great Expectations, Frankenstein, A Christmas Carol, in fact all of Dickens' shorts and all of Poe's Dupont mysteries. What are you talking about, Battle Royale constantly cuts between character groups to show what everyone is doing. I already said I'm not trying to defend this line and yes the dialogue is corny, but this is clearly meant to be corn-ball schlock. And mark my words in a few episodes it's gonna go from cornball schlock to gore filled exploitation schlock...and that's just fine with me. |
Apr 30, 2016 10:05 AM
#157
| Ok now it's a giant bird? penguin? this is getting so ridiculous |
Apr 30, 2016 10:58 AM
#158
| I love how previously we were all trying to come up with serious theories about what was going to happen, and then this episode happens and drags us more or less back to square one. I honestly don't even have a single idea about where this is going to go. It's still really enjoyable though. |
Apr 30, 2016 11:04 AM
#159
Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: I feel like this show got a bad rep early on and now people are just blindly not giving it a chance. It manages to keep me entertained and always ends the episode in a compelling cliffhanger that makes you want to see what happens next. And those should be considered some of the hallmarks of a good mystery show. A cliffhanger is compelling by nature. It's a lazy plot device used by bad writers who can't write a show that is interesting on it's own, so they show half of an important event in one episode and then just put the other half in the next episode so you have to watch it. Cliffhangers are a hallmark of a bad mystery. Beyond that, the character logic is redundant and contradictory, not to mention stupid. The cast is generic and shallow, and the show has more characters than it knows what to do with. The dialogue is B-movie bad. Like, The Room bad. "I see dead people." I had to pause and bury my face in my hand for a few minutes. My god. "I actually see people who are going to die." So do I. Every single day. What a retarded line. A cliffhanger is not a "lazy plot device" it has been used in countless classic works of literature dating back hundreds of years. The cast is shallow because many of them (I assume) are merely there to die, to be cannon fodder. They don't have time to develop nearly 30 characters in a mere 12 episodes so the characters have to be super tropey so we can immediately know their personalities. "I see dead people" is a line from The Sixth Sense, a critically acclaimed movie. Now sit back down you philistine :p First of all, I'd like you to name a single acclaimed literary work that employs cliffhangers. Second, the point is that they shouldn't have had 30 characters in the first place, or if they did, they shouldn't have tried to give all of them equal screen time and also take a quarter of the first episode to establish who they are and what their motivations are. We don't need to see what every single character is doing because it doesn't matter. You don't need personalities for what eventually amount to fodder. However, this show decides to place emphasis on this point, leading to an incredibly underdeveloped main cast. It also wastes screen time and leads to this show moving along at a snail's pace. Third, I know it's from the Sixth Sense. That doesn't make it a good line. It's oddly placed, lacking contextually, and on top of that it's stolen from a better work. If I made a show where the characters had no dialogue except quotes from various critically acclaimed films, would that mean I wrote a work of genius? No, it'd be a shallow, shitty, extremely derivative work, sort of like this show. Dickens, Caroll, Shelley and Poe all used cliffhangers in their works. Battle Royale had around 30 characters on a bus, most of whom had little character and were only ever intended to die, and that's hailed as a classic I agree it was a bad line, but so what? Did it really destroy the show for you. First of all, I said name a work. You haven't done that. Beyond that, a cliffhanger in an episodic work such as this cannot even be compared to literary works with no intention of continuation. Those works utilize ambiguity to allow the reader to come to his own conclusion analytically or to further the central dogma of the novel. None of them end halfway through an event, making it necessary to read David Copperfield 2: Electric Boogaloo to figure out what happens next. Beyond that, these cliffhangers aren't even well executed. Most of them are simply forgotten about or swept under the rug in the next episode before moving on to something else. Oh yeah, that one dude was floating in the river. Better go look for him for about five minutes, then go back to the camp to argue some more. Second, Battle Royale is a film that does exactly what I described: It doesn't have to show what every single character is doing at every single moment. Beyond that, it's fodder characters still manage to develop a decent amount of depth in their limited screen time, and enough of the film is dedicated to the main cast that their characterization doesn't suffer. Mayoiga does none of this. As I've mentioned, having a large cast can be done well if handled by a competent director who can manage his characters. Unfortunately for Mayoiga, the director is neither capable of handling a large cast, nor even remotely competent. Third, no one line did not ruin the show for me. The rest of them did though. That was simply an example of the horrible dialogue that pervades every single scene of this show. There was also the characters, the visual design, the opening, the plot progression, and the character logic. All of it is piss poor and all of it ruins the show. Do you actually want me to sit there and name works by these authors? well fine, Great Expectations, Frankenstein, A Christmas Carol, in fact all of Dickens' shorts and all of Poe's Dupont mysteries. What are you talking about, Battle Royale constantly cuts between character groups to show what everyone is doing. I already said I'm not trying to defend this line and yes the dialogue is corny, but this is clearly meant to be corn-ball schlock. And mark my words in a few episodes it's gonna go from cornball schlock to gore filled exploitation schlock...and that's just fine with me. Those works are intended to be read as a whole though, they were only released in serialized volumes to make them accessible to a wider range of readers. Beyond that, the cliffhangers in those works are actually resolved well and manage to add to the narrative rather than simply exist. Battle Royale does cut between characters, yes. However, those glimpses are short and sweet, giving us insight into the character's psyche and their personality. A five second shot of a naked girl walking away from two corpses, accompanied by a white text stating the names of the two killed, gives us more information in mere seconds than Mayioga's transitions do in five minutes. Beyond that, yeah, the show is terrible. Just because the show is supposed to be terrible doesn't make it any less terrible. If you enjoy it, fine. But don't go around saying it has the hallmarks of a great mystery. |
| This is man's ultimate fighting machine. The synthetic life form know as Evangelion, Unit 01. Built here in secret, it is mankind’s last hope. |
Apr 30, 2016 11:08 AM
#160
| I still can't understand why Lovepon has, not only freedom after her murder attemp, but the "smart people", more like the idiots who think they are intelligent, are following what she orders. FFS a guy attacked another boy in highschool and gets imprisoned again for nothing, but this girl not only tries to kill someone, actually has torture tools and they let her do what she wants? I'd be scared of being near, but well, seeing that almost 3 minutes of the episode are "why should we call the dead guy" whatever, this is a comedy. Lion: "I can see ghost" pffhahhahf Lion: "Actually, I can see those who are going to die" hahahahah I didn't expect this show would make me pause it to laugh. Sukebe14 said: That other guy was locked for attempted murder but total psycho lovepon, that did the same, is allowed to walk free?...okayyyy When I watched first ep I expected serious, psychological, horror anime similar to "Another" , but apparantly its one of those "so bad that it's good" types But this is actually another 2.0. Both fails in the same points, both are more a comedy than a mistery and both have a MC that needs to die in extremely agony. |
| Waifus only represent ideals |
Apr 30, 2016 11:13 AM
#161
| @Evangeliman We obviously aren't going to agree and if you don't like the show that's fine, hell I don't think it's particularly good either but a lot of the hate it gets is entirely undeserved. And I'll never accept that a cliffhanger a lazy plot device, it's a long standing and legitimate plot device. Do you think critics ever complain that shows like Breaking Bad or Game of Thrones use cliffhangers? No, they rightly praise them for keeping the audience hooked. |
Apr 30, 2016 11:18 AM
#162
Bobby2Hands said: @Evangeliman We obviously aren't going to agree and if you don't like the show that's fine, hell I don't think it's particularly good either but a lot of the hate it gets is entirely undeserved. And I'll never accept that a cliffhanger a lazy plot device, it's a long standing and legitimate plot device. Do you think critics ever complain that shows like Breaking Bad or Game of Thrones use cliffhangers? No, they rightly praise them for keeping the audience hooked. Ugh. Those are shows that are praised and also happen to have cliffhangers. They are not shows praised for their cliffhangers. A good work utilizing a shitty narrative device does not make that device good at all. |
| This is man's ultimate fighting machine. The synthetic life form know as Evangelion, Unit 01. Built here in secret, it is mankind’s last hope. |
Apr 30, 2016 11:26 AM
#163
Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: @Evangeliman We obviously aren't going to agree and if you don't like the show that's fine, hell I don't think it's particularly good either but a lot of the hate it gets is entirely undeserved. And I'll never accept that a cliffhanger a lazy plot device, it's a long standing and legitimate plot device. Do you think critics ever complain that shows like Breaking Bad or Game of Thrones use cliffhangers? No, they rightly praise them for keeping the audience hooked. Ugh. Those are shows that are praised and also happen to have cliffhangers. They are not shows praised for their cliffhangers. A good work utilizing a shitty narrative device does not make that device good at all. You scored Baccano! and Steins;Gate a 10 and they have constant cliffhangers. I'm sure you like a whole lot of stuff that uses cliffhangers. I'm sorry but thinking that cliffhangers are a "shitty narrative device" is a dumb opinion and one which not many people hold. There are plenty of legitimate flaws in Mayoiga to complain about, but the fact that they use cliffhangers is not one of them. |
Apr 30, 2016 11:34 AM
#164
Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: @Evangeliman We obviously aren't going to agree and if you don't like the show that's fine, hell I don't think it's particularly good either but a lot of the hate it gets is entirely undeserved. And I'll never accept that a cliffhanger a lazy plot device, it's a long standing and legitimate plot device. Do you think critics ever complain that shows like Breaking Bad or Game of Thrones use cliffhangers? No, they rightly praise them for keeping the audience hooked. Ugh. Those are shows that are praised and also happen to have cliffhangers. They are not shows praised for their cliffhangers. A good work utilizing a shitty narrative device does not make that device good at all. You scored Baccano! and Steins;Gate a 10 and they have constant cliffhangers. I'm sure you like a whole lot of stuff that uses cliffhangers. I'm sorry but thinking that cliffhangers are a "shitty narrative device" is a dumb opinion and one which not many people hold. There are plenty of legitimate flaws in Mayoiga to complain about, but the fact that they use cliffhangers is not one of them. I rated those 10 because a work isn't defined by it's use of cliffhangers alone. Do you get that? I don't dislike Mayoiga because it uses cliffhangers, I simply counted it as one of many weak points of the show. But of course because my opinion is "dumb" cliffhangers must be a good narrative device, right? Forget the fact that they rarely add anything to the work narratively, or are consistently implemented poorly in nearly every work they're presented in, everyone uses them so they must be good, right? |
| This is man's ultimate fighting machine. The synthetic life form know as Evangelion, Unit 01. Built here in secret, it is mankind’s last hope. |
Apr 30, 2016 11:37 AM
#165
Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: @Evangeliman We obviously aren't going to agree and if you don't like the show that's fine, hell I don't think it's particularly good either but a lot of the hate it gets is entirely undeserved. And I'll never accept that a cliffhanger a lazy plot device, it's a long standing and legitimate plot device. Do you think critics ever complain that shows like Breaking Bad or Game of Thrones use cliffhangers? No, they rightly praise them for keeping the audience hooked. Ugh. Those are shows that are praised and also happen to have cliffhangers. They are not shows praised for their cliffhangers. A good work utilizing a shitty narrative device does not make that device good at all. You scored Baccano! and Steins;Gate a 10 and they have constant cliffhangers. I'm sure you like a whole lot of stuff that uses cliffhangers. I'm sorry but thinking that cliffhangers are a "shitty narrative device" is a dumb opinion and one which not many people hold. There are plenty of legitimate flaws in Mayoiga to complain about, but the fact that they use cliffhangers is not one of them. I rated those 10 because a work isn't defined by it's use of cliffhangers alone. Do you get that? I don't dislike Mayoiga because it uses cliffhangers, I simply counted it as one of many weak points of the show. But of course because my opinion is "dumb" cliffhangers must be a good narrative device, right? Forget the fact that they rarely add anything to the work narratively, or are consistently implemented poorly in nearly every work they're presented in, everyone uses them so they must be good, right? I don't know what to tell you dude, but pretty much any critic would tell you you're wrong. If I went to a film class and my tutor told me cliffhangers were a lazy plot device I would walk out the room because they clearly know nothing about the subject. |
Apr 30, 2016 11:38 AM
#166
| The people who wanted to leave the village are back. After an argument, some people don't want to live with "suspects". In order of this, awkward and extreme groups were developed. The people bcome crazier and stranger. Despite this show's (non-existing) qualities, I always wanted to watch the next episode. But this time, I don't feel so. |
Apr 30, 2016 11:44 AM
#167
Tsukurai said: mimiiria said: Manga reveals that Tokimune is Mitsumune's real name. There's a theory that Mitsumune had a twin brother that died, and Mitsumune started using his name instead of his own. That was the first thing to come in mind when he started crying when Masaki complimented his name. I thought something like his twin brother died but their parents thought that he was the one who died and he believe they love his brother more so he decided to live as his brother. And I don't think even Hayato knows this Almost like To the moon :) |
Apr 30, 2016 11:45 AM
#168
Apr 30, 2016 11:53 AM
#169
| The show is getting more weirder and weirder! Lovepon is so crazy! That ending!!! |
Apr 30, 2016 12:10 PM
#170
Thnx4dafood said: Yeah they really do xDgust11 said: Thnx4dafood said: What if this whole thing is an experiment or "human research" study on how people react to things and what a person is capable of doing when feared. Reminds me of that awesome horror movie "Cabin in the Woods" where the whole thing was staged for scientists releasing new monsters and seeing who dies and gambling on lives and such Maze Runner since they were being tested to find out how humans supposedly react to certain things so that the scientists could develop a cure or true rational human mindset to implement into 'Cranks,' people whose minds have deteriorated and therefor lost all sense of reason I've seen the movie(because I'm lazy and don't read), those kind of movies like to mess with my mind xD |
Apr 30, 2016 12:16 PM
#171
| Is this anime ever going to give us any answers or will it keep on popping up questions? Wtf am I watching. |
check out my twitch: https://twitch.tv/slowy |
Apr 30, 2016 12:24 PM
#172
| I've been waiting for some major horror aspect to this show, e.g. a monster who is stalking the characters and kills them (the bear LOL). Now I don't think that's going to happen. There is definitely supernatural stuff going on with all the hallucinations they are seeing and hearing. But I think if they are going to die, they are going to kill each other. Their mental state is slowly degenerating and they are already starting to break up into smaller groups. I can see maybe 4 or 5 groups forming as they become more mentally disturbed. Those groups will be fighting each other and within themselves. The most mentally disturbed person in the group is Lovepon and she is getting more and more batshit every episode - hint hint. The more rational characters are still hanging in there, but I think everyone is slowly going mad. At the end, someone will have to find out what's causing it and stop it before they all kill each other. Most likely the wussy MC and Misaki, because who else could it possibly be LOL? Also, nobody has even been CONFIRMED dead yet, no actual bodies. Everyone could just be seeing/hearing things. Was that really Yottsun in the river? Did Mr. Asshole really die, or did he just fall down the hill and break his ankle? All this is just my opinion, I know nothing more than you do as there is no source material for this show. 4/5 for the episode, will keep watching! |
Apr 30, 2016 12:55 PM
#173
| well, i'm not supsrised with the rating. it's obvious. i got pissed off by the character too. there are one thing that i like and i dislike from this anime. The thing that i dislike is the character. my god. especially this episode. it was as if i was seeing a bunch of elitist and casual people bashing each other opinions. freaking pissing me off so bad, espeically with that execution thing. CAN SHE EVEN SHUT HER MOUTH UP FOR A SECOND DAMMIT!!! in the middle of a serious arguement and suddenly someone just say something like that really pissed me off. and that glasses guy. just please. erase him from this freaking series. too freaking annoying. and the things that i like is about the story, the Lost Village itself. i'm curious for about what will happen to them all too. i hope 90% of them died and this show never fail to get me freak out by all of the expression that the character made after they saw something scary but in the end it's not something scary instead makes me want to say "WTF?" that ending for example. looking foward for the explanation of the penguin thing or whatever it is in the end. just don't leave it empty like "big masamune" i can't say i enjoy this episode so much but i like the thrill. looking foward for the next episode. current missing people and death : 2 missing, 1 death. possibility missing people and death in the next episode IMO : 2death/2missing/1death/1missing/none |
YizelTroApr 30, 2016 1:08 PM
Apr 30, 2016 12:58 PM
#174
Apr 30, 2016 1:02 PM
#175
| Welp...holy shit that ending. A giant penguin thing with half a human face. This is like Lost and Twin Peaks mixed together. |
Apr 30, 2016 1:13 PM
#176
| Lovepon is so annoying, I can't stand her. She needs to disappear next. And Mitsumune is so dumb. Now I know why Speedstar felt the need to basically control everything he does. I also hope Jack's okay. He barely did anything but he was locked up while the yandere is the one talking about killing everyone. It's infuriating! |
Apr 30, 2016 1:13 PM
#177
| I don't know where the show is heading honestly but I guess that's actually a good thing? The theorie that everyone sees sth different when it comes to this "monster" seems to be true though but that doesn't really explain what this "thing" really is and why it is there in the first place. MC is so pathetic I can't even watch his face without CRINGING like they are in a really really bad situation and all he thinks about is to how many girls he talked to? Woah seriously calm down boy. |
Apr 30, 2016 1:58 PM
#178
| The paranoia in this series is a 10, everyone is accusing everyone else. I also love how character disappear and are forgotten about next episode. It's a really weird show with crazy & annoying characters but its somehow compulsive viewing. |
Apr 30, 2016 2:10 PM
#179
| This show reminds me a lot of Lost on ABC. The characters are selfish people struggling in life, and the setting is a dangerous, weird place with lots of mystery. Yup, this is the anime version of Lost. |
Apr 30, 2016 2:11 PM
#180
Apr 30, 2016 2:16 PM
#183
| I hate to say it, but I will have to rate this anime 1/10 because it doesn't warn people suffering from Acrophobia. Seriously, I almost died watching this. |
Apr 30, 2016 2:22 PM
#184
| This show is quickly becoming a parody of itself, also I fucking hate leon and her whole fucking archetype. |
Apr 30, 2016 2:27 PM
#185
| BEST. ANIME. OF. THE. SEASON. Be straight trippin' at this point -_- |
"Anime is trash and so am I." |
Apr 30, 2016 2:38 PM
#186
| What the hell is that Tokimune??? Well, it seems Lovepon and that girl who loves guns are getting flashback in the next ep., so I'm looking forward to that. |
Apr 30, 2016 2:54 PM
#187
Apr 30, 2016 2:58 PM
#188
Apr 30, 2016 3:12 PM
#189
| this show can't stop throwing creepy songs out of nowhere; every episode |
Apr 30, 2016 3:37 PM
#190
Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: @Evangeliman We obviously aren't going to agree and if you don't like the show that's fine, hell I don't think it's particularly good either but a lot of the hate it gets is entirely undeserved. And I'll never accept that a cliffhanger a lazy plot device, it's a long standing and legitimate plot device. Do you think critics ever complain that shows like Breaking Bad or Game of Thrones use cliffhangers? No, they rightly praise them for keeping the audience hooked. Ugh. Those are shows that are praised and also happen to have cliffhangers. They are not shows praised for their cliffhangers. A good work utilizing a shitty narrative device does not make that device good at all. You scored Baccano! and Steins;Gate a 10 and they have constant cliffhangers. I'm sure you like a whole lot of stuff that uses cliffhangers. I'm sorry but thinking that cliffhangers are a "shitty narrative device" is a dumb opinion and one which not many people hold. There are plenty of legitimate flaws in Mayoiga to complain about, but the fact that they use cliffhangers is not one of them. I rated those 10 because a work isn't defined by it's use of cliffhangers alone. Do you get that? I don't dislike Mayoiga because it uses cliffhangers, I simply counted it as one of many weak points of the show. But of course because my opinion is "dumb" cliffhangers must be a good narrative device, right? Forget the fact that they rarely add anything to the work narratively, or are consistently implemented poorly in nearly every work they're presented in, everyone uses them so they must be good, right? I don't know what to tell you dude, but pretty much any critic would tell you you're wrong. If I went to a film class and my tutor told me cliffhangers were a lazy plot device I would walk out the room because they clearly know nothing about the subject. Explain to me why Cliffhangers are good devices with a reason other than "Other people say they are." |
| This is man's ultimate fighting machine. The synthetic life form know as Evangelion, Unit 01. Built here in secret, it is mankind’s last hope. |
Apr 30, 2016 3:38 PM
#191
| All I even care about this point is how Masaki is involved in all this. I can rest in peace when that happens. |
Apr 30, 2016 3:41 PM
#192
Evangeliman said: Explain to me why Cliffhangers are good devices with a reason other than "Other people say they are." It's just a plot device, that's it. It's not good or bad. What matters is its execution. Which in this instance was very meh lol |
Apr 30, 2016 3:46 PM
#194
Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: @Evangeliman We obviously aren't going to agree and if you don't like the show that's fine, hell I don't think it's particularly good either but a lot of the hate it gets is entirely undeserved. And I'll never accept that a cliffhanger a lazy plot device, it's a long standing and legitimate plot device. Do you think critics ever complain that shows like Breaking Bad or Game of Thrones use cliffhangers? No, they rightly praise them for keeping the audience hooked. Ugh. Those are shows that are praised and also happen to have cliffhangers. They are not shows praised for their cliffhangers. A good work utilizing a shitty narrative device does not make that device good at all. You scored Baccano! and Steins;Gate a 10 and they have constant cliffhangers. I'm sure you like a whole lot of stuff that uses cliffhangers. I'm sorry but thinking that cliffhangers are a "shitty narrative device" is a dumb opinion and one which not many people hold. There are plenty of legitimate flaws in Mayoiga to complain about, but the fact that they use cliffhangers is not one of them. I rated those 10 because a work isn't defined by it's use of cliffhangers alone. Do you get that? I don't dislike Mayoiga because it uses cliffhangers, I simply counted it as one of many weak points of the show. But of course because my opinion is "dumb" cliffhangers must be a good narrative device, right? Forget the fact that they rarely add anything to the work narratively, or are consistently implemented poorly in nearly every work they're presented in, everyone uses them so they must be good, right? I don't know what to tell you dude, but pretty much any critic would tell you you're wrong. If I went to a film class and my tutor told me cliffhangers were a lazy plot device I would walk out the room because they clearly know nothing about the subject. Explain to me why Cliffhangers are good devices with a reason other than "Other people say they are." I already did but I'll say it again. Cliffhangers are good because they keep the audience hooked, and they have been used effectively in fiction between chapters/publications/episodes in countless great works spanning hundreds of years and appearing in just about every genre. It's the very thing that makes a book a page turner, that makes a show so appealing to binge watch. |
Bobby2HandsApr 30, 2016 3:50 PM
Apr 30, 2016 3:46 PM
#195
Lovepon is starting to annoy me... Ok, you are special but this is too much! I mean, everyone else treats her like it was a joke... As we could see in the preview, maybe next episode will be about her. I mean, this is not the face of a sane person... (cute af tho) I'll admit it, my heart rate raised in the last 20 seconds... that shit was intense! And for a second I thought Masaki was going to turn into a corpse or something! Just for the way she appeared right outta nowhere and saying she wanted to talk... and then Mitsumune's face... oh god... THE GIANT PENGUIN WITH HUMAN EYE!! The theory of the Purgatory is still strong, but the hallucinogen theory too. PD: As a bonus |
HumbertoZeroApr 30, 2016 3:53 PM
Apr 30, 2016 3:49 PM
#196
Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: @Evangeliman We obviously aren't going to agree and if you don't like the show that's fine, hell I don't think it's particularly good either but a lot of the hate it gets is entirely undeserved. And I'll never accept that a cliffhanger a lazy plot device, it's a long standing and legitimate plot device. Do you think critics ever complain that shows like Breaking Bad or Game of Thrones use cliffhangers? No, they rightly praise them for keeping the audience hooked. Ugh. Those are shows that are praised and also happen to have cliffhangers. They are not shows praised for their cliffhangers. A good work utilizing a shitty narrative device does not make that device good at all. You scored Baccano! and Steins;Gate a 10 and they have constant cliffhangers. I'm sure you like a whole lot of stuff that uses cliffhangers. I'm sorry but thinking that cliffhangers are a "shitty narrative device" is a dumb opinion and one which not many people hold. There are plenty of legitimate flaws in Mayoiga to complain about, but the fact that they use cliffhangers is not one of them. I rated those 10 because a work isn't defined by it's use of cliffhangers alone. Do you get that? I don't dislike Mayoiga because it uses cliffhangers, I simply counted it as one of many weak points of the show. But of course because my opinion is "dumb" cliffhangers must be a good narrative device, right? Forget the fact that they rarely add anything to the work narratively, or are consistently implemented poorly in nearly every work they're presented in, everyone uses them so they must be good, right? I don't know what to tell you dude, but pretty much any critic would tell you you're wrong. If I went to a film class and my tutor told me cliffhangers were a lazy plot device I would walk out the room because they clearly know nothing about the subject. Explain to me why Cliffhangers are good devices with a reason other than "Other people say they are." I already did but I'll say it again. Cliffhangers are good because they keep people hooked and they have been used effectively in fiction between chapters/publications/episodes in countless great works spanning hundreds of years and appearing in just about every genre. It's the very thing that makes a book a page turner, that makes a show so appealing to binge watch. Look if you don't like cliffhangers that's fine but just know you are in a tiny minority of people. What you just said is "I'll say it again: Lots of people have used them." Yes cliffhangers keep people hooked. That doesn't mean they're not a lazy device. It's like dropping a bunch of backstory before you kill a character off. Sure, you can garner some cheap feels, but you'd have a hard time arguing Akame ga Kill is a masterpiece of emotional writing. |
| This is man's ultimate fighting machine. The synthetic life form know as Evangelion, Unit 01. Built here in secret, it is mankind’s last hope. |
Apr 30, 2016 3:53 PM
#197
Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: Evangeliman said: Bobby2Hands said: @Evangeliman We obviously aren't going to agree and if you don't like the show that's fine, hell I don't think it's particularly good either but a lot of the hate it gets is entirely undeserved. And I'll never accept that a cliffhanger a lazy plot device, it's a long standing and legitimate plot device. Do you think critics ever complain that shows like Breaking Bad or Game of Thrones use cliffhangers? No, they rightly praise them for keeping the audience hooked. Ugh. Those are shows that are praised and also happen to have cliffhangers. They are not shows praised for their cliffhangers. A good work utilizing a shitty narrative device does not make that device good at all. You scored Baccano! and Steins;Gate a 10 and they have constant cliffhangers. I'm sure you like a whole lot of stuff that uses cliffhangers. I'm sorry but thinking that cliffhangers are a "shitty narrative device" is a dumb opinion and one which not many people hold. There are plenty of legitimate flaws in Mayoiga to complain about, but the fact that they use cliffhangers is not one of them. I rated those 10 because a work isn't defined by it's use of cliffhangers alone. Do you get that? I don't dislike Mayoiga because it uses cliffhangers, I simply counted it as one of many weak points of the show. But of course because my opinion is "dumb" cliffhangers must be a good narrative device, right? Forget the fact that they rarely add anything to the work narratively, or are consistently implemented poorly in nearly every work they're presented in, everyone uses them so they must be good, right? I don't know what to tell you dude, but pretty much any critic would tell you you're wrong. If I went to a film class and my tutor told me cliffhangers were a lazy plot device I would walk out the room because they clearly know nothing about the subject. Explain to me why Cliffhangers are good devices with a reason other than "Other people say they are." I already did but I'll say it again. Cliffhangers are good because they keep people hooked and they have been used effectively in fiction between chapters/publications/episodes in countless great works spanning hundreds of years and appearing in just about every genre. It's the very thing that makes a book a page turner, that makes a show so appealing to binge watch. Look if you don't like cliffhangers that's fine but just know you are in a tiny minority of people. What you just said is "I'll say it again: Lots of people have used them." Yes cliffhangers keep people hooked. That doesn't mean they're not a lazy device. It's like dropping a bunch of backstory before you kill a character off. Sure, you can garner some cheap feels, but you'd have a hard time arguing Akame ga Kill is a masterpiece of emotional writing. Honestly we're not gonna agree here, and at this point we aren't even talking about Mayoiga anymore. I like cliffhangers, most people do, and most people don't consider them bad writing. If you don't like them then fine, that's your opinion |
Apr 30, 2016 3:59 PM
#198
| what the actual fuck is going on in this anime? haha |
Apr 30, 2016 4:22 PM
#199
| Once more confirmed that the're hallucinating for some reason, what's the role of Masaki? And that ending ... |
Apr 30, 2016 4:23 PM
#200
| I think I know where this anime is headed. As I always said, I'm excited for new episodes sine I find this anime seriously interesting. What is Masaki though? That's the question. In addition, I seem to suspect that people are seeing things personally. This is a "personal" horror journey in a way. Think of it like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. The kids in there die one by one because of a flaw in him or her. The same thing with this anime. Each character is going to experience a "horror" that is pertaining to his or her flaw and that will cause him or her to "die." |
More topics from this board
Poll: » Mayoiga Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Stark700 - Jun 17, 2016 |
415 |
by Alkimia
»»
Jun 13, 10:02 PM |
|
Poll: » Mayoiga Episode 11 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 )Stark700 - Jun 10, 2016 |
200 |
by Alkimia
»»
Jun 13, 9:33 PM |
|
Poll: » Mayoiga Episode 10 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 )Stark700 - Jun 3, 2016 |
242 |
by Alkimia
»»
Jun 13, 7:14 PM |
|
Poll: » Mayoiga Episode 9 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 )Stark700 - May 27, 2016 |
206 |
by Alkimia
»»
Jun 13, 6:02 PM |
|
Poll: » Mayoiga Episode 8 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 )Stark700 - May 20, 2016 |
203 |
by Alkimia
»»
Jun 13, 5:15 PM |
