New
Feb 28, 2016 3:56 AM
#151
Sure , why not ... A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not advanced by that opponent. Isn't this basically what you just did by making that "half joke" ? I was very clearly implying that the topic should be up for discussion and not immediately dismissed using the "her body, her choice" argument because i find it absurd to begin with. Which is why this is discussed before any form of consummation takes place ? The scenario you are discussing is not even likely to happen unless one of them changes their mind afterwards, in which case, the opinion of the one who "breaches" the agreement should be disregarded regardless if its the male or the female. That's how rights are preserved, by signing a contract beforehand, any form of "change of heart" that comes afterwards is rendered moot. traed said: If they have no relationship there is nothing to discuss. It usually is something discussed between two people because it influences their relationship if they have any. How/Why are they having a baby together if they're not in a relationship ?! ... traed said: To suggest a man should have a say is making an argument that does not need to be made thus the only conclusion that can be made is you must arguing for the only part where a woman gets more say, which is the final say. It is not absurd to draw such a conclusion from such vague statements of false arguments. You read a simple one liner stating that "this topic needs to be discussed further" and derived what seems to be in your own wording "a vague statements of false arguments". The actual/initial implied argument that "a man should have a say" is only false from your perspective and according to your own standards and no one else's. But you're doing a fine job on agreeing with yourself, please dont stop on my account. |
ZA_WAYDFeb 28, 2016 3:59 AM
Feb 28, 2016 4:11 AM
#152
ZRoT said: mara_ said: It has no memories, no knowledge, no nothing. Religion is for stupid people to get on with living. This topic is about abortion, not religion. Why bring it up? Are you implying only people who are religious disagree with abortion? Bringing it up since most people who are against abortion are religious. I am unable to see any logical reason why abortion should be illegal. |
Feb 28, 2016 4:14 AM
#153
I think abortion is fine if both of the parents don't want a child but then you have people that believe its wrong for taking a life. its just a fetus it doesn't have dreams yet. but if one of the parents wants the child you should not have an abortion. |
Feb 28, 2016 8:34 AM
#154
It quite a strange question to ask in an anime/manga dedicated forum, I think. But to answer it, I think it all depend's on one's perspective, ethics and situation. In some worst case scenarios, I think it is definitely the right thing to do. |
EuhinFeb 28, 2016 8:39 AM
Feb 28, 2016 1:34 PM
#155
It's perfectly fine. Then yet me being okay with it could be because I just really hate kids. |
Feb 28, 2016 2:20 PM
#156
How many abortion threads is this now? 33? Anyway, abortion is morally fine. Discussion over. |
Feb 28, 2016 10:17 PM
#157
khunter said: How many abortion threads is this now? 33? Anyway, abortion is morally fine. Discussion over. Controversial topics tend to rise from the ashes on MAL. |
Feb 28, 2016 10:31 PM
#158
Of course a simple mistake should not cost you the next 18 years of your or a lovers life. Having children forces you down a specific path in life that rarely ends well for the parent. Especially if young at first, youth is a time for careers and growing up, not having children. Not anymore the world population is enough as it is. I'd also agree that if the father doesn't want the child but the mother decides to keep it against his wishes then he doesn't have to pay for the child. |
Feb 28, 2016 10:50 PM
#159
@ZA_WAYD No, its not because its in the form of a question. You misunderstand what "her body her choice"means. It means that "she" gets the decision. It does not mean other people can not influence that decision. It is not something you can have a legally forced joint decision. There is no way to compromise when two people want different things.The only time it makes sense for a males choice to come into play beyond influencing decisions is if he was raped by the girl or something. What kind of statement is that about them having to be in a relationship? It's not common but some girls get pregnant from one night stands and want a baby, also from rape too which is more common than you would think. Some guys have sex with girls with the intent of making them pregnant without a relationship, for example an impregnation fetish. |
Feb 28, 2016 10:54 PM
#160
Spooks said: I'd also agree that if the father doesn't want the child but the mother decides to keep it against his wishes then he doesn't have to pay for the child. I think this would be right, but as it is now the mother decides the fate of the child and the father has no say on the matter. So if the child is unwanted for the father, it is a 18 year long punishment. |
Feb 28, 2016 11:00 PM
#161
CondemneDio said: Spooks said: I'd also agree that if the father doesn't want the child but the mother decides to keep it against his wishes then he doesn't have to pay for the child. I think this would be right, but as it is now the mother decides the fate of the child and the father has no say on the matter. So if the child is unwanted for the father, it is a 18 year long punishment. We have too many older women getting pregnant from young school boys aged 13 up and they instead of going to jail get the courts to agree that the boys have to pay child support for 18 years. http://www.businessinsider.com/male-statutory-rape-victim-nick-olivas-must-pay-child-support-2014-9?IR=T |
Feb 28, 2016 11:03 PM
#162
Spooks said: CondemneDio said: Spooks said: I'd also agree that if the father doesn't want the child but the mother decides to keep it against his wishes then he doesn't have to pay for the child. I think this would be right, but as it is now the mother decides the fate of the child and the father has no say on the matter. So if the child is unwanted for the father, it is a 18 year long punishment. We have too many older women getting pregnant from young school boys aged 13 up and they instead of going to jail get the courts to agree that the boys have to pay child support for 18 years. http://www.businessinsider.com/male-statutory-rape-victim-nick-olivas-must-pay-child-support-2014-9?IR=T Shit, that story's disturbing and scary as fuck. The amounts they have to pay are ludicrous as well. |
Feb 28, 2016 11:07 PM
#163
Feb 28, 2016 11:07 PM
#164
I'm a man so my opinion is without actual experience. While us men can have an opinion, would it differ if we were of the opposite sex? |
Feb 28, 2016 11:14 PM
#165
Feb 28, 2016 11:16 PM
#166
JudeGP said: Depends on the situation If the women was raped and got pregnant then yes. If it was just due to unprotected sex, no ...Why? If the child is unwanted, isn't it the parents decision and right to abort it? |
Feb 28, 2016 11:40 PM
#167
Feb 29, 2016 1:09 AM
#168
JudeGP said: If the child is unwanted leave them at an orphanage. If they don't want a child then they should have protected sex Isn't it wrong to force someone to give birth? Pregnancy isn't some rosy, easy task that you can just do for the lolz. |
Feb 29, 2016 4:14 AM
#169
We have too many people without arguments here. So as usual, I'll post mine. It seems that since I’ve stopped debating with my usual fervor, now people seem to think they really have a chance, I find it amusing how the simple fact that I’m known by the community and that this community is slowly getting “used to me”, now my arguments seem to have no merit, bandwagons are now the usual case, as no one seems to even care anymore to argue complete idiocy unlike I do because I do like the endeavor itself, even so, they devolve into a completely erroneous shifting of the burden of proof when I merely want them to show me exactly how they got to such reasoning for the mere purpose of leading them towards the truth or so we can have a proper debate. I merely ask for it because there really is nothing to debate if there is nothing behind the conclusion too. But it seems I’m always forced to take a position of attrition, to have to repeat myself although my points have not been countered in the slightest. To have to explain even the “axioms” we’re depending on for the debate to even function. It’s really pathetic when you want to show your position is better but you really can’t… But let’s change that, shall we? Let’s make this all fun. Let’s take every position that has been claimed and debunk them once more. I’ll make this as exhaustive as my mood can possibly let me. I’ll probably add arguments that haven’t been uttered yet. It seems that now I have to prepare my arguments for each case, no longer can I depend on these to be dynamic and situational. If that’s what you want, then I can help you out. Let’s start with the case of this girl, considering this is the whole reason for the other arguments. We know: - The girl is 10 years old. That means she legally can’t choose, in Paraguay it’s even more true. - She was raped by her stepfather. - Abortion is not completely legal in Paraguay, only if the mother’s life is in danger. So let’s start with the easy part, we know for a fact that girls that give birth have a higher chance of dying, them and the baby, the video even claims it is 5 times higher than an adult woman, although the problem isn’t always biological but socioeconomic, it seems there are even biological issues, (we’re talking about Paraguay, so socioeconomic issues do exist) like low weight births and premature births. So this means her chances of dying and her baby dying are quite high already if you want her to give birth. This should already be conclusive enough for her case, considering that in Paraguay, 1 in 270 to 1 in 500 women die from child birth, that’s also because a lot of these pregnancies are teens in Paraguay, around 20%. The rate of infant deaths seems to be from 21:1000 to 32:1000. Quite fucking high if you ask me. I don’t know the reason for why Paraguay illegalized abortion except for special cases. The OP presumes “religion”, so I will go with that, considering Paraguay is a third-world country and 88% of the populace is catholic. YES, I THINK THAT MIGHT BE THE REASON AFTER ALL. Anyway, if abortion is permitted only in these special cases, legal wise, she fits every criteria, but for some reason, the video claims that the medics do not want to make a claim on how dangerous this will be to her and the video also claims that there is no legal action because she’s underage, as I’ve proven above, the chances of death exist always, but her chances are increased exponentially, even so more if she lives in a third world country. It’s funny that abortion is only legal when someone’s life is in danger though, I’ll talk about abortion itself in a bit, when we’re concerned with the “ethical” argument. I’m not here to shit on Paraguay though, I’m here to destroy your arguments, so I’m going to talk about the matter of keeping the child. Let’s start with the concluding argument. We know for a fact that this was rape. So she had no choice in the conception of this being. Keeping it is retarded starting from that. Now with the least concluding argument. The other issue is the socioeconomic issue, we can guess that she is in a bad situation, and child labor is illegal, but it happens, and presuming from all the statistics that exist, they get paid shit. So she really won’t be able to properly raise it, she’d have to raise it with the help of her family which is already in a shitty situation most likely. Keeping it will only damage her situation and her families situation, to her because it seems high fertility rates are correlated to low education, in the case of teenagers and children., and because of the above, the lack of money will not be a good thing to her family. Then, to conclude: TL;DR: - The girl and her baby can easily die from this. - She had no choice in the matter because she was raped. - If she keeps the child, her situation and the child’s situation will only worsen (presumably if they survive). From all this, I have to say that abortion is the best option, socioeconomically, medically and “ethically” (the “socio” part takes that into consideration, but I’ll express it again, I’ll go in depth in my “abortion” section, I don’t want to ruin all the fun, I’ll correlate to her case a bit because I want to discuss the idea of “choice” further), If we want to save as many lives as possible. To conclude my argument with WAD, this is how laws are made in a perfect system, it’s written specifically for you so it's easy to understand. In a perfect system, there is no corruption, solutions always exist and are always taken into consideration. But in “reality”, as you might like to say, we have cases like in Paraguay, where the voters get shit upon and have “coup d’etats” going on, or put in charge someone like Berlusconi, which did not follow his program, instead he only sucked upon Italy’s wealth and made laws to not be able to get prosecuted or have his laws forced in (ex. Purcellum which if I really have to I’ll translate). The other issue of “reality” is that not every bill is wanted by the populace. And the bills are not controlled by the populace even without corruption. Not every bill is something the elected talked about in their program either. For example, the pornography laws in the UK. There are also laws that are unrelated to ethics, and are not shaped by them. Some laws are ethical because they remained since older times. Ethics are made by communities, but it’s not a given that every community will have the same ethics, and equating ethics to law is incredibly ignorant and misguided. Let’s not forget that ethics with no basis in reason tend to be useless and harmful anyway, thinking directly of abortion, and I’ll explain why with my “abortion” section of the argument. I’ll also explain the more common “ethical” concerns, that don’t include random “BUT I DON’T LIKE IT” type of thinking but rather, “does it do harm? does it do more harm than good?”. Now, let’s discuss “abortion”. Definition of “abortion”: “Abortion is the ending of pregnancy by the removal or forcing out from the womb of a fetus or embryo before it is able to survive on it’s own. It can also happen naturally, in that case it’s often called a “miscarriage”.” Now that we know what it is, let’s discuss the issue at hand. Is it “right” to make abortion legal in every case? Well, let’s talk about opposites first, let’s talk about making abortion illegal unless there are special cases like the endangerment of the mother’s life, let’s start from the antithesis. “Abortion is dangerous for the mother, if we consider the statistics, the risk of death increases with the length of pregnancy, from an astonishing 0.7 per 100000 women dying from child birth during at or before 8 weeks to a 1 per 99000 women after 21 weeks. The mental trauma is also extreme for the mother. Abortion is unethical because we kill a human being, like, what if Gandhi would have been aborted? She should have just closed her legs, if she was willing to have sex, then she was willingly taking the risk of pregnancy, she could have also used contraceptives. But it’s fine, in cases of rape and incest I’ll agree with abortion, that’s ok, or if her life is in danger. Otherwise, she should just wait and give the child for adoption instead of abortion. Heh, I’m so great with puns. Anyway, the idea is that it’s selfish. Got that? I mean, women should not use abortion as a contraceptive either, that’s just wrong. You wouldn’t like it if your mother wanted to abort you either, right? Plus, it’s completely unethical and against God almighty. The fucker gave us life for a reason, right? Heil Hitler.” Now… “Let’s shred them…” First of, yes, 0.7 per 100000 women is fucking extreme m8, you got me there. Whoever you are, you’re great at reading statistics. But it seems you’ve forgot something. “Don’t sweat it, I have it here for you…” It’s the amount of maternal deaths and the comparison between numbers, a woopin’ 18.5 out of 100000 from simple childbirth in the US. Let’s not make it that unfair though, I’ll take something that fits the date of my statistics on abortions. Which is… A nice 9.1 per 100000 live births. Most abortions are late because of reasons like lack of money. Considering that most of the women that wanted the abortion earlier were on the poorer side (about 60%? Check the stats, I don’t remember). It seems child birth is actually more dangerous than abortion. Who would have ever fucking thought that that was the case? Not you, most likely. For a fine example of how it went when abortion was illegal, I’ll give you my country of origin. Romania. More women died because many of them couldn’t get an abortion, thus, did it through illegal means or through really dangerous ways. Heh… The need pushes you, doesn’t it? Oh, and the trauma? Here you go. It seems the “mental trauma” would have been the same if they would have kept the unwanted child. What else do you have? Let’s see… The issue of women using it as a “contraceptive” is ridiculous at best, there are no statistics for that, considering that abortions are actually decreased by real contraceptives. 1, 2. And it’s costly too, way more costly than contraceptives. The idea of “what if you were aborted” is an appeal to emotion, mostly. First of, I can’t possibly know that. I would have no opinion on the matter, I’m too neurologically incapable to assess the situation and it’s also unlikely that at earlier than 24 weeks I could even be able to feel pain. So I would just stop functioning. The concept of “But what if someone like Einstein would be born if you let the fetus live?”, is an appeal to the future, an appeal to improbable hypotheses and absurd, because I can use the same argument in reverse… What if a new Hitler would be born? Oh… Wait… That “Heil Hitler” was classy, I’m serious… The whole concept of “But it’ll be a human being.” is absurd not only because of ethical reasons (which I’ll explain later), but also a retarded appeal to the future again, what it can be is not the same as what it is. It could be just as it couldn’t be a living human being IN THE FUTURE. Anything can happen in the future. In a debate it’s not an argument, it’ll also kill a lot of research if we follow such ideas. Like stem cells research and totipotent cell research. You’re basically making it harder for us to find treatment for certain illnesses and even harder for the idea of growing organs for use. There are other examples, but really now… The idea that contraceptives work 100% of the time is also flawed, accidents happen, it’s also not a given that it’s easy for teens to get contraceptives. Or that sexual ed isn’t fucking retarded in the US or other places., but then again. This is really a red herring and a strawman, this argument of yours that “women should take responsibility.”, it’s no longer an issue of “pro-life”, it’s another issue, an issue I can’t express because I’ll get banned, but you have it. Agreeing only in the case of incest and rape makes me think that you’re saying that a child born from such acts is a lesser being or something, even when healthy. I think you’re a hypocrite and it’s a bit retarded to limit choice for arbitrary reasons after all. But oh well, you brought God up, it must be that arbitrary reasoning moves your life anyway. To answer Bambi_, you do judge, that’s inherent and it’s pronounced even more in this case. The moment you claim that you see the one’s committing the act as “selfish”, that means you just judged them. How simple, right? Your reason was that it’s selfish because someone could have wanted that baby, but as I used the previous example, I would also like you to come here in Italy, pay the airtrip yourself and have sex with me for free, it would be selfish for you not to do it. I MEAN, I REALLY WANT IT. The argument of “selfishness” doesn’t work because every human action is inherently selfish. And having to use your own body to promote “unselfish” acts (which are impossible), how idiotic. And “selfish” in your case is something negative too, so your biased judgment will lead you to biased actions towards them, unnoticeable and minor, surely, but having a “negative mentality” towards reasonable actions is stupid anyway. Anyway… What else do we have? OHHHHH…? The idea that the fetus is a HUMAN BEING. Heheheheheeee… Oh, this is going to be fun, although a repetition of my other argument, you have yet to debunk it. No, a fetus is not a “human being”, it is made out of “human cells”, so it is “human”, but it’s yet to be a “person”, or even a “being”. But let’s make it “person”, shall we? I’ll take what Mary Ann Warren (philosopher) has said about being a “person”: 1. A developed capacity for reasoning - Which a fetus does not possess, I’ll just take this as “capacity for reasoning”. 2. Self awareness- Which a fetus does not possess again. They are unaware of their surroundings and their existence until around 41 weeks, when they can actually distinguish sounds and the mother’s voice. That isn’t really being aware of surroundings and existence, but anyway. 3.Consciousness and ability to feel pain- A fetus can feel pain at 28 weeks, they do not possess a consciousness though. 4. Self motivated activity - A fetus is not properly aware of it’s movements, they’re not from his own volition. 5. Capacity to communicate messages of an indefinite variety of types - A fetus cannot communicate, people sometimes misinterpret kicks or movement with communication but the fetus is not aware of an outside world, or its mother until 41 weeks. So basically, you can’t “murder” a fetus, you can “kill” it though. After 24 weeks, it’s illegal to have an abortion anyway, unless there are specific cases, like the endangerment of the mother. That’s when the mother is always chosen if her life is in danger. It’s not enough for him to be “human”, because even a finger is “human”, even a “cell” is human. But we “kill” every day. From cells, to bugs, to other animals, to plants, etc, yet we have no issues with that. I’d say it’s a necessary hypocrisy to not want to kill a “human being”, but killing something “human” is not the same as killing a “human being”, otherwise getting rid of genital warts fits your criteria too. The other issue is again, the issue of “choice”, which I’d love to talk about right now. I’ll start with the idea that a “guardian” or “parent” has the right to interfere with the choice of a mother that is underage with the issue of the fetus, in our case, and so say international studies, a mother at 10 years old will have problems, like death. Actually, anything under the age of 15 will have problems with child birth, so the most sensible course of action is abortion. It’s less traumatic in the long and short run. It’s not a given, like almost nothing is a given… There have been cases in which children were given the legal right to consent for medical purposes. And children in general understand death 1, and surely as hell they understand the concept of pain and causing pain, I’d say these are harder to understand than the mechanical act of sex, but hey… Children tend to not be able to have children until they become teenagers anyway, which is around the age of 10. Now, let’s get started with adults (which will include teenagers). Let’s not only end it with the idea that a fetus can’t be a person. Let’s get to the crux of the problem. I’ve given you a link earlier in the abortion definition of fetal viability. Do you know why I did that? Oh, it’s simple. A fetus cannot survive by it’s own. No, a baby can’t hunt or forage or go to the supermarket, but a baby can survive WITHOUT the aid of the mother’s body, AKA they no longer need the umbilical cord. Most under the 24th week DO NOT survive AT ALL. Where am I getting here? Oh, of course, the direct dependency on a person and its body, NOT ONLY on the person, but its body too. I mean, even if the “fetus” would have the right to live, the right to live does not come with the right on another’s body, that’s because you’ll soon tell me that harvesting organs of living people that are living well even, is OK, because another can live off their organs. The right to live does not mean you have the right to put someone’s life in danger either, the act of childbirth still is more threatening to a mother’s life than abortion. I thought women had the right like any other human being to not have the will of someone else forced on their bodies, “fetuses” before fetal viability included. Otherwise I can use the argument of “selfishness” for thanking Bambi_. So, in conclusion. You are all wrong. Let’s see your arguments… Delivered to you by the God of Rustling. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Feb 29, 2016 9:28 AM
#170
For the typical exceptions (e.g rape, danger to the mother's life), yes, for sure. If no exceptions apply, is a little harder for me to say yes without thinking it's hypocritical. Kagami_Hiiragi said: I'm a man so my opinion is without actual experience. While us men can have an opinion, would it differ if we were of the opposite sex? It's probably worse because, as current social and legal consensus goes, the father has no say whatsoever on his partner's decision to have an abortion, so he can only hope that she'll want to carry it to term. |
Feb 29, 2016 9:37 AM
#171
traed said: @ZA_WAYD What kind of statement is that about them having to be in a relationship? It's not common but some girls get pregnant from one night stands and want a baby, also from rape too which is more common than you would think ... 3 or 4 replies later and its STILL wasn't made cristal clear that we were initially discussing married couples, not particular cases where the male is practically non existent and a girl gets impregnated after her prom night. Perhaps, this is my fault since i wasn't even aiming at building rapport. OBVIOUSLY in a situation where the male is non existent he wont get a say, he is "non existent" ... does this even need to be said ? ... |
Feb 29, 2016 10:13 AM
#172
PantsuPillow said: If you just want to have unprotected sex and abort every time because of it and also because you don't want to use the pill, then no. However if you got raped , condom tore , or your safe day wasn't so safe after all then yes. Also if you cannot look after the baby and know you don't have the time or money then yes. Also if you know the baby will suffer from any diseases then yes. Also if you split up with your partner then yes. Putting the baby up for adoption IS NOT an option. Children often end up in horrible homes , and very often turn out to be problem children when they come from orphanages. It is not a life I would want a child to have even if I were the one who put him up for adoption. My honest opinion is that no man or woman should be forced to have a child they don't want to. The reason I also mention men is because there are often cases of women poking holes in condoms to forcibly tie the knot , which I don't agree with. The man should also have a say whether or not he wants to have the child or not , however in today's society the man literally has no say in the matter despite it also being his child. Opinions differ about it , however due to overpopulation and other crap currently going on with society I am very pro abortion. What's the moral harm in constantly having unsafe sex and aborting? |
WEAPONS - My blog, for reviews of music, anime, books, and other things |
Feb 29, 2016 12:08 PM
#173
TheBrainintheJar said: PantsuPillow said: If you just want to have unprotected sex and abort every time because of it and also because you don't want to use the pill, then no. However if you got raped , condom tore , or your safe day wasn't so safe after all then yes. Also if you cannot look after the baby and know you don't have the time or money then yes. Also if you know the baby will suffer from any diseases then yes. Also if you split up with your partner then yes. Putting the baby up for adoption IS NOT an option. Children often end up in horrible homes , and very often turn out to be problem children when they come from orphanages. It is not a life I would want a child to have even if I were the one who put him up for adoption. My honest opinion is that no man or woman should be forced to have a child they don't want to. The reason I also mention men is because there are often cases of women poking holes in condoms to forcibly tie the knot , which I don't agree with. The man should also have a say whether or not he wants to have the child or not , however in today's society the man literally has no say in the matter despite it also being his child. Opinions differ about it , however due to overpopulation and other crap currently going on with society I am very pro abortion. What's the moral harm in constantly having unsafe sex and aborting? One of the main reasons I mention this is because it's often people who cannot afford clinical abortions or if they come from third world countries they find themselves stuck in a position where they either don't wish to pay the fees or cannot afford the fees associated with it , or simply decide to take things into their own hands , and end up really f@#$ing up either by not working hygienically , or using dangerous methods to achieve the said abortion. I know of a woman that died by aborting on her own. She used a knitting needle to try and abort , however due to not working hygienically she got a severe infection and passed away. I didn't know her personally , however I heard that she frequently aborted her own baby's. Personally I don't think the moral harm is really that relevant because no-one get's mentally "hurt" except for the people undergoing to abortion. If a person made a choice to abort then it is their right to do so. If they are scarred by it then they probably won't get into a situation where it's necessary to abort again. |
Feb 29, 2016 11:59 PM
#174
PantsuPillow said: TheBrainintheJar said: PantsuPillow said: If you just want to have unprotected sex and abort every time because of it and also because you don't want to use the pill, then no. However if you got raped , condom tore , or your safe day wasn't so safe after all then yes. Also if you cannot look after the baby and know you don't have the time or money then yes. Also if you know the baby will suffer from any diseases then yes. Also if you split up with your partner then yes. Putting the baby up for adoption IS NOT an option. Children often end up in horrible homes , and very often turn out to be problem children when they come from orphanages. It is not a life I would want a child to have even if I were the one who put him up for adoption. My honest opinion is that no man or woman should be forced to have a child they don't want to. The reason I also mention men is because there are often cases of women poking holes in condoms to forcibly tie the knot , which I don't agree with. The man should also have a say whether or not he wants to have the child or not , however in today's society the man literally has no say in the matter despite it also being his child. Opinions differ about it , however due to overpopulation and other crap currently going on with society I am very pro abortion. What's the moral harm in constantly having unsafe sex and aborting? One of the main reasons I mention this is because it's often people who cannot afford clinical abortions or if they come from third world countries they find themselves stuck in a position where they either don't wish to pay the fees or cannot afford the fees associated with it , or simply decide to take things into their own hands , and end up really f@#$ing up either by not working hygienically , or using dangerous methods to achieve the said abortion. I know of a woman that died by aborting on her own. She used a knitting needle to try and abort , however due to not working hygienically she got a severe infection and passed away. I didn't know her personally , however I heard that she frequently aborted her own baby's. Personally I don't think the moral harm is really that relevant because no-one get's mentally "hurt" except for the people undergoing to abortion. If a person made a choice to abort then it is their right to do so. If they are scarred by it then they probably won't get into a situation where it's necessary to abort again. Oh, you're talking about the logistic side instead of the moral one. I understand you better. Kagami_Hiiragi said: I'm a man so my opinion is without actual experience. While us men can have an opinion, would it differ if we were of the opposite sex? Just because I'm a man doesn't mean I can't comment on people forcing people into existence. That's like saying I can't comment on rape. Yes, childbirth and rape have a lot of similarities. |
WEAPONS - My blog, for reviews of music, anime, books, and other things |
Mar 1, 2016 12:11 AM
#175
TheBrainintheJar said: Just because I'm a man doesn't mean I can't comment on people forcing people into existence. That's like saying I can't comment on rape. Yes, childbirth and rape have a lot of similarities. Like I said, us men can have an opinion. I just said it could differ or be a different extreme if we were female. Also, bad example. Men can't give birth, but men can get raped. Though, irrevelant since I agree we can have opinions. |
Mar 1, 2016 2:02 AM
#176
In short, yes, I think it is ok, with the exception of late term abortions, unless there are extenuating circumstances. What I always find disturbing about these conversations, is not whether abortion is morally right or wrong, but how many people would force others to live by their moral compass as if it was Universal or some grand truth that should dictate law. |
|
Mar 1, 2016 2:51 AM
#177
Kagami_Hiiragi said: TheBrainintheJar said: Just because I'm a man doesn't mean I can't comment on people forcing people into existence. That's like saying I can't comment on rape. Yes, childbirth and rape have a lot of similarities. Like I said, us men can have an opinion. I just said it could differ or be a different extreme if we were female. Also, bad example. Men can't give birth, but men can get raped. Though, irrevelant since I agree we can have opinions. Men can get born. Birth isn't an isolated activity. It directly affects the born. So if a woman tells me I'm not allowed to comment on her birth, I just see an arrogant little shit who doesn't care who she hurts. |
WEAPONS - My blog, for reviews of music, anime, books, and other things |
Mar 1, 2016 3:12 AM
#178
rekindledflame said: In short, yes, I think it is ok, with the exception of late term abortions, unless there are extenuating circumstances. What I always find disturbing about these conversations, is not whether abortion is morally right or wrong, but how many people would force others to live by their moral compass as if it was Universal or some grand truth that should dictate law. Well, it is, in its core, a moral topic. And you know how it goes when people start talking about morals. Anti-abortion people also don't have any other way of battling pro-abortion opinions. |
Mar 1, 2016 3:18 AM
#179
Actually my first thought about this would always be. If you dont want to get pregnant. Learn to fucking avoid it. We we got pills, condoms, the knowledge of the period time. Seriously people wtf how did you get in this mess. But then again of course there is still something called raping. So i just go with this. As long there is not really life i think it is oke to abort. But ad what stage is it even living? that i don't know. |
.. |
Mar 1, 2016 4:32 AM
#180
TheBrainintheJar said: Kagami_Hiiragi said: TheBrainintheJar said: Just because I'm a man doesn't mean I can't comment on people forcing people into existence. That's like saying I can't comment on rape. Yes, childbirth and rape have a lot of similarities. Like I said, us men can have an opinion. I just said it could differ or be a different extreme if we were female. Also, bad example. Men can't give birth, but men can get raped. Though, irrevelant since I agree we can have opinions. Men can get born. Birth isn't an isolated activity. It directly affects the born. So if a woman tells me I'm not allowed to comment on her birth, I just see an arrogant little shit who doesn't care who she hurts. Easy to say for a man since we aren't women, but you're making a debate off of nothing since I never said we can't have an opinion which you indirectly claimed I did. You can have your say, that wasn't the point. |
Mar 1, 2016 8:56 AM
#181
ABSOLUTELY! fine IMO. Why bring a child in poverty? Why bring a child if they are disabled? Why bring a child if you got raped? Why bring a child if the father is not yours? so many. If your not ready go for it. LOOK there are so many serious shit happenign around the world and people are getting cancer for talking about this topic. Peopel grow the fuck up. Who cares if they abosritaitons. That;'s there chouice |
Mar 1, 2016 9:04 AM
#182
I support abortion for the sheer fact that republican lawmakers protect the baby only while it is in the womb. Putting the burden of proof on somebody to take care of a child that they don't want is tantamount to making a life decision for that person. Pro-lifers on this thread: If the law required a mother to bring a baby to term, would you then be willing to take care of it? Just something to think about. Perhaps we should require all pro-lifers to register at adoption agencies so unwanted babies can be given to them. Another thing to think about is also ghetto rats spitting out children. Enough of you already complain about how welfare strains the system. Imagine a world where abortion is illegal. Suddenly doesn't sound all that hot. honestly just my two cents. I understand the arguments for pro-life as well as why people support it, but I am a logical person, so I would love to hear some rebuttals. |
Mar 1, 2016 9:09 AM
#183
Have conditions that are necessary, then it is best abort the child what is born and it is suffering from neglect, discrimination, prejudice,abandonment etc. |
Mar 1, 2016 9:12 AM
#184
Mar 2, 2016 1:08 AM
#185
Kagami_Hiiragi said: TheBrainintheJar said: Kagami_Hiiragi said: TheBrainintheJar said: Just because I'm a man doesn't mean I can't comment on people forcing people into existence. That's like saying I can't comment on rape. Yes, childbirth and rape have a lot of similarities. Like I said, us men can have an opinion. I just said it could differ or be a different extreme if we were female. Also, bad example. Men can't give birth, but men can get raped. Though, irrevelant since I agree we can have opinions. Men can get born. Birth isn't an isolated activity. It directly affects the born. So if a woman tells me I'm not allowed to comment on her birth, I just see an arrogant little shit who doesn't care who she hurts. Easy to say for a man since we aren't women, but you're making a debate off of nothing since I never said we can't have an opinion which you indirectly claimed I did. You can have your say, that wasn't the point. "I'm a man so my opinion is without actual experience" You're right. I did distort this. My apologies. Now, to refocus, the sex of the person definitely influences the opinion. Women are much closer to the experience of birth and pregnancy. However, since birth isn't an isolated activity I don't buy into the whole 'men deciding for women' argument. Birth IS deciding for other people, so countering it using this is hypocritical. You didn't pull this argument but it's a common one I hear for abortions (I'm actually all for abortions but for different reasons). |
WEAPONS - My blog, for reviews of music, anime, books, and other things |
Mar 2, 2016 2:34 AM
#186
There are plenty of reasons why a woman decides to have an abortion: - she has no money for it - she is a kid herself - she was raped - she made PGD (pre-implantation genetic diagnostics) and found out her kid will have a Down Syndrome (that's a totally different and very complicated topic but still a reason for some to say no to a kid) - it's her own right So yes, I'm totally for abortions and for making them legal throughout the world. |
More topics from this board
Poll: » will there be any zombie outbreak in the near future?FruitPunchBaka - 10 hours ago |
8 |
by MalchikRepaid
»»
2 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » Do you believe in moral facts? ( 1 2 )Freshell - May 5 |
52 |
by DreamWindow
»»
11 minutes ago |
|
» What do you think about education in your country?Sad - 6 hours ago |
10 |
by MalchikRepaid
»»
12 minutes ago |
|
» What do you think about law enforcement (police) in your country? ( 1 2 )Sad - Apr 16 |
56 |
by DreamWindow
»»
31 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » banality of evil and milgram experimentdeg - Yesterday |
23 |
by NoelleIsSleepy
»»
33 minutes ago |