Are Threads going downhill?

Offline

Jul 2014

273

kurosaki344 said:
No, users can't do it the way things work currently, I'd suggest you to get your facts straight first of all. When a mod does notice or reported of an already existant thread, that thread will be locked. Now, there was no need to be so Tsun-Tsun was there?

Don't know what you mean, last I checked users can make multiple posts. If they can do that they can easily necro their thread and thus flood page one with multiple necro'd threads.
Unless I'm missing something but by the looks of it that seems to be the case.
And like you stated mods can easily fix that situation than you seem to have randomly brought up even though my idea doesn't promote it anymore than the current method.

In either case I must say do stop posting, there are enough idiots here I don't need one that is actually annoying enough to waste my time with his stupidity.

AnarchicSloth said:
Opinions can't be wrong, that's why they're opinions. Ideas, actions and stuff like that can be wrong. You were hostile to me for a suggestion and because I disagreed with you but I'm still not wrong.

Opinions can be wrong, you cam at me with your mentality that there is nothing wrong with dead threads and necroing to which I corrected you.
This is why dead threads receive no posts even when necro'd, yet when a user remakes it, it floods with countless new replies until its inevitable lock up thanks to mods.

Your opinion would be comparable to a man telling me feces tastes good, or that he thinks he can fly as he proceeds to jump off a building.
Don't care its wrong.

KronieAug 24, 2014 4:56 AM

Aug 24, 2014 4:56 AM

#253

Offline

Jul 2018

561872

Kronie said:

Don't know what you mean, last I checked users can make multiple posts. If they can do that they can easily necro their thread and thus flood page one with multiple necro'd threads.
Unless I'm missing something but by the looks of it that seems to be the case.
And like you stated mods can easily fix that situation than you seem to have randomly brought up even though my idea doesn't promote it anymore than the current method.

In either case I must say do stop posting, there are enough idiots here I don't need one that is actually annoying enough to waste my time with his stupidity.

Yes, users can multiple post, but it can't be the same as an already existant thread, or a former thread that they have created in the past. Moving on, to "necro" a thread means reviving a certain thread, so wouldn't that thread be the same as an already existant thread in order to be revived? Which is directly against the rules? Don't worry, I enjoy talking to you as well <3

Aug 24, 2014 5:03 AM

#254

Offline

Jul 2014

273

kurosaki344 said:

Yes, users can multiple post, but it can't be the same as an already existant thread, or a former thread that they have created in the past. Moving on, to "necro" a thread means reviving a certain thread, so wouldn't that thread be the same as an already existant thread in order to be revived? Which is directly against the rules? Don't worry, I enjoy talking to you as well <3

And how exactly would that be any different with my idea? I don't remember making statements of removing the current restrictions of necro spamming threads.
You truly are making no points here.

Also, reading your gibberish gives me a headache do try at the very least and make the things you spout more readable for those that aren't a part of your special ed classes.
I can't even respond to your 2nd part of necroing.

Its truly not rocket science child, remove threads that are inactive nothing more nothing less.

Aug 24, 2014 5:04 AM

#255

Cyaegha

Offline

Mar 2014

2954

Oh. This old chestnut.

Aug 24, 2014 5:08 AM

#256

no-thanks

Offline

Nov 2008

18019

you fucks discussing necro threads:

1. mal doesn't like you to necro threads. i've been warned for necroing threads to post about a relevant topic.
2. mal doesn't like dupe threads. if they can search a part of the thread title and find the subject of that thread in another thread (that's likely locked), they will lock your thread.
2. mal doesn't like double posting, so think again about necroing a thread with a double post. they don't like thread necroing anyway.

it's a stupid trio of 'rules' to put together.

Aug 24, 2014 5:10 AM

#257

Offline

Jul 2018

561872

Kronie said:
And how exactly would that be any different with my idea? I don't remember making statements of removing the current restrictions of necro spamming threads.
You truly are making no points here.

Actually killing off threads and allowing users to re-create them is pretty much the same as saying removing the current restrictions about that since the whole idea is re-creating is basically the same thing as necroing.

Also, Kronie pls, are you going to start making some sense instead of typing your hate?

On a second note, you stated that you have little tolerance to the wrong opinion of others. Now, if we consider the past you that haves a wrong opinion of this whole necroing talk, doesn't that means that you should hate the "you" that haves the wrong opinion as well? Since he's not the same person as the current you, he should qualify to enter your large list of lovely hate.

Aug 24, 2014 5:12 AM

#258

Offline

Jul 2014

1732

Kronie said:
Opinions can be wrong, you cam at me with your mentality that there is nothing wrong with dead threads and necroing to which I corrected you.
This is why dead threads receive no posts even when necro'd, yet when a user remakes it, it floods with countless new replies until its inevitable lock up thanks to mods..

Opinion: "a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge". It cant be wrong or right, it's just an opinion. And yes, you provided valid points with the dead threads, regarding those with too many replies at least. And where did I say there is nothing wrong with dead threads and "necroing". I simply said it was stupid to worry about such trivial things, to which you helped me change my opinion. You didn't correct me, there was nothing to correct, you merely changed my mind.

I'M GONE NOW

Aug 24, 2014 5:24 AM

#259

Offline

Jul 2014

273

kurosaki344 said:
Actually killing off threads and allowing users to re-create them is pretty much the same as saying removing the current restrictions about that since the whole idea is re-creating is basically the same thing as necroing.

Also, Kronie pls, are you going to start making some sense instead of typing your hate?

On a second note, you stated that you have little tolerance to the wrong opinion of others. Now, if we consider the past you that haves a wrong opinion of this whole necroing talk, doesn't that means that you should hate the "you" that haves the wrong opinion as well? Since he's not the same person as the current you, he should qualify to enter your large list of lovely hate.

No, there is a difference between the same thread being recreated and a thread being necro'd. One is fresh the other has long since had its discussion concluded and thus have very little to add onto it.
There is no point for users to place their input in a thread that is already chock full of it. A reason why this thread is being ignored by most users now because no one wants to fucking add their input into a 14+ page thread. Because the discussion if there was any has long been concluded and will soon die when you fucks decide to fuck off with your stupidity.

I'm not wrong nor have I been so no need for this mentality of self hating which is something you seem to have an overabundance of.

AnarchicSloth said:
Opinion: "a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge". It cant be wrong or right, it's just an opinion. And yes, you provided valid points with the dead threads, regarding those with too many replies at least. And where did I say there is nothing wrong with dead threads and "necroing". I simply said it was stupid to worry about such trivial things, to which you helped me change my opinion. You didn't correct me, there was nothing to correct, you merely changed my mind.

It can be wrong, I don't care about your subjective views if its stupid and lacks logic or common sense then its automatically wrong.

And yes I changed your mind from a wrong point a view to a correct one, nothing new.

Aug 24, 2014 5:30 AM

#260

Offline

Jul 2018

561872

Kronie said:
No, there is a difference between the same thread being recreated and a thread being necro'd. One is fresh the other has long since had its discussion concluded and thus have very little to add onto it.
There is no point for users to place their input in a thread that is already chock full of it. A reason why this thread is being ignored by most users now because no one wants to fucking add their input into a 14+ page thread. Because the discussion if there was any has long been concluded and will soon die when you fucks decide to fuck off with your stupidity.

I'm not wrong nor have I been so no need for this mentality of self hating which is something you seem to have an overabundance of.

No, no, in some cases the talk could be concluded yes, but why would the individual feel the need to necro a thread that held a decent conversation, ended and completed it's purpose? The threads that would be necroed are the threads that were un-popular and did not reach to a conclusion, which is the same as this re-creating the threads idea of yours.

If you honestly believe that a thread completed it's purpose would be "necroed" out of nowhere, I'd suggest you to "fuck off with your stupidity".

Aug 24, 2014 5:34 AM

#261

Offline

Jul 2014

1732

Kronie said:
It can be wrong, I don't care about your subjective views if its stupid and lacks logic or common sense then its automatically wrong.

And yes I changed your mind from a wrong point a view to a correct one, nothing new.

*Gives up because Kronie won't stop being tsundere.*

I'M GONE NOW

Aug 24, 2014 5:36 AM

#262

circle

Offline

Aug 2012

6897

funny thing is that this thread was necro'd a couple days ago, people seem to be discussing in it just fine

Aug 24, 2014 5:36 AM

#263

Offline

Jul 2014

273

kurosaki344 said:

No, no, in some cases the talk could be concluded yes, but why would the individual feel the need to necro a thread that held a decent conversation, ended and completed it's purpose? The threads that would be necroed are the threads that were un-popular and did not reach to a conclusion, which is the same as this re-creating the threads idea of yours.

If you honestly believe that a thread completed it's purpose would be "necroed" out of nowhere, I'd suggest you to "fuck off with your stupidity".

No one cares about unpopular threads that didn't reach its conclusions, the reason they were unpopular and didn't reach it in the first place is because they were shit to begin with, why even bother with it?

No one gave a shit about them and by god people still wont after its necro'd and individuals are replying to age old posts.

If completed threads wont be necro'd then what purpose do they have for continuing to exist? All it does is stop users who weren't a part of it to partake in the same discussion. Its a barrier which does nothing but ruin the damn quality of the overall place.

Aug 24, 2014 5:37 AM

#264

Offline

Jul 2014

1732

Afshar said:
funny thing is that this thread was necro'd a couple days ago, people seem to be discussing in it just fine

No, stop. Opinions are wrong, suggestions are wrong, everything is wrong unless Kronie agrees it's right.

I'M GONE NOW

Aug 24, 2014 5:42 AM

#265

Offline

Jul 2018

561872

Kronie said:
No one cares about unpopular threads that didn't reach its conclusions, the reason they were unpopular and didn't reach it in the first place is because they were shit to begin with, why even bother with it?

No one gave a shit about them and by god people still wont after its necro'd and individuals are replying to age old posts.

If completed threads wont be necro'd then what purpose do they have for continuing to exist? All it does is stop users who weren't a part of it to partake in the same discussion. Its a barrier which does nothing but ruin the damn quality of the overall place.

This is really hillarious, no one cares about unpopular threads? Kronie, your whole idea of giving users the chance to re-create the threads is about caring for those threads so that they may finally reach a conclusion, and it is exactly as you say, no one will give a shit about them either way.

Also about the completed threads, they are there for those who are new and might be interested in reading them, or for those that actually want to go trough it again, there is no need for them to be necroed since it is against the rules in the first place and served their purpose.

Aug 24, 2014 5:44 AM

#266

Offline

Jul 2014

273

Afshar said:
funny thing is that this thread was necro'd a couple days ago, people seem to be discussing in it just fine

By "people" you mean 2 idiots with one decently intelligent individual and by "discussion" you mean them spewing nonsense at him?

Yes, such a mighty fine discussion it is as usual I can count on you with the half brained statements.

AnarchicSloth said:

Afshar said:
funny thing is that this thread was necro'd a couple days ago, people seem to be discussing in it just fine

No, stop. Opinions are wrong, suggestions are wrong, everything is wrong unless Kronie agrees it's right.

There is no need to start being immature.

Aug 24, 2014 5:47 AM

#267

circle

Offline

Aug 2012

6897

Kronie said:

Afshar said:
funny thing is that this thread was necro'd a couple days ago, people seem to be discussing in it just fine

Yes, such a mighty fine discussion it is as usual I can count on you with the half brained statements.

roger that

Aug 24, 2014 5:51 AM

#268

Offline

Jul 2014

1732

Kronie said:
There is no need to start being immature.

And dismissing what might as well be fact just because you disagree with it isn't? My definition of opinion was the first result from google, a search engine with billions of pages, data and god-knows-what-else and it sure as hell has more credibility than some closed minded asshole on the internet (that would be yourself).

I'M GONE NOW

Aug 24, 2014 5:52 AM

#269

Offline

Jul 2014

273

kurosaki344 said:
This is really hillarious, no one cares about unpopular threads? Kronie, your whole idea of giving users the chance to re-create the threads is about caring for those threads so that they may finally reach a conclusion, and it is exactly as you say, no one will give a shit about them either way.

Also about the completed threads, they are there for those who are new and might be interested in reading them, or for those that actually want to go trough it again, there is no need for them to be necroed since it is against the rules in the first place and served their purpose.

You clearly with your inability of proper reading comprehension misinterpreted my statements. Unpopular threads were never of my interest its popular threads that received worthwhile amount of replies and were concluded which is what I'm arguing for.

Unpopular threads are unpopular for a reason, they are shit and don't resonate well with the community obviously they are "bad" threads and without a doubt should simply fuck off for good.

And no one is autistic enough to read peoples opinions and arguments on an already concluded topic that has several brain dead users placing their input in it.
And yes I agree necroing them is stupid it achieves nothing.
However allowing us to recreate them and allowing users especially new ones to partake in it is whats important.
I don't understand the logic of locking away successful topics, well no shit if you lock away the successful topics all we are going to end up with are the unsuccessful shitty ones that no one fucking wants.

And then we wonder why the quality of this dump has supposedly worsened.

Aug 24, 2014 5:59 AM

#270

Offline

Jul 2018

561872

Kronie said:
You clearly with your inability of proper reading comprehension misinterpreted my statements. Unpopular threads were never of my interest its popular threads that received worthwhile amount of replies and were concluded which is what I'm arguing for.

Unpopular threads are unpopular for a reason, they are shit and don't resonate well with the community obviously they are "bad" threads and without a doubt should simply fuck off for good.

And no one is autistic enough to read peoples opinions and arguments on an already concluded topic that has several brain dead users placing their input in it.
And yes I agree necroing them is stupid it achieves nothing.
However allowing us to recreate them and allowing users especially new ones to partake in it is whats important.
I don't understand the logic of locking away successful topics, well no shit if you lock away the successful topics all we are going to end up with are the unsuccessful shitty ones that no one fucking wants.

And then we wonder why the quality of this dump has supposedly worsened.

For the millionth time, re-creating threads and necroing them are the same thing, and I do pray that your reading comprehension will finally be able of understanding that fact unless your brain is the sworn enemy of logic itself.

Also, many people do talk in these "shitty" threads that you describe and they do enjoy it, you should also realize that there are people that will always like something that the other person hates, it's the modern society, if you are that sick of it, feel free to go back to 4chan, it's not like people here are masochist enough to chain you here and throw bullshit at you to feed on your rage.

Aug 24, 2014 6:03 AM

#271

Offline

Jul 2014

1732

kurosaki344 said:

Kronie said:
You clearly with your inability of proper reading comprehension misinterpreted my statements. Unpopular threads were never of my interest its popular threads that received worthwhile amount of replies and were concluded which is what I'm arguing for.

Unpopular threads are unpopular for a reason, they are shit and don't resonate well with the community obviously they are "bad" threads and without a doubt should simply fuck off for good.

And no one is autistic enough to read peoples opinions and arguments on an already concluded topic that has several brain dead users placing their input in it.
And yes I agree necroing them is stupid it achieves nothing.
However allowing us to recreate them and allowing users especially new ones to partake in it is whats important.
I don't understand the logic of locking away successful topics, well no shit if you lock away the successful topics all we are going to end up with are the unsuccessful shitty ones that no one fucking wants.

And then we wonder why the quality of this dump has supposedly worsened.

For the millionth time, re-creating threads and necroing them are the same thing, and I do pray that your reading comprehension will finally be able of understanding that fact unless your brain is the sworn enemy of logic itself.

Also, many people do talk in these "shitty" threads that you describe and they do enjoy it, you should also realize that there are people that will always like something that the other person hates, it's the modern society, if you are that sick of it, feel free to go back to 4chan, it's not like people here are masochist enough to chain you here and throw bullshit at you to feed on your rage.

Stop bothering, he refuses to even doubt himself. He's too far up his own arse to save him now.

I'M GONE NOW

Aug 24, 2014 6:06 AM

#272

http://www.edgebuggyforums.com ?

Offline

Jul 2014

273

kurosaki344 said:
For the millionth time, re-creating threads and necroing them are the same thing, and I do pray that your reading comprehension will finally be able of understanding that fact unless your brain is the sworn enemy of logic itself.

Also, many people do talk in these "shitty" threads that you describe and they do enjoy it, you should also realize that there are people that will always like something that the other person hates, it's the modern society, if you are that sick of it, feel free to go back to 4chan, it's not like people here are masochist enough to chain you here and throw bullshit at you to feed on your rage.

No they are not the same thing. People have little motivation to post in necro'd threads face facts you obviously child.
Remaking threads attracts more people as opposed to necro'd threads and the reasoning behind it is very obvious.

The time I start caring what other people enjoy or like is the time I will off myself as I quite frankly don't have enough fucks.
I'm quite tempted to, but even then that community is as garbage as this one at this point, both are cancerous.

Aug 24, 2014 6:11 AM

#273

Uchiha

Offline

Dec 2013

6021

Kronie said:
I'm quite tempted to, but even then that community is as garbage as this one at this point, both are cancerous.

Aug 24, 2014 6:14 AM

#274

Offline

Jul 2018

561872

Kronie said:
No they are not the same thing. People have little motivation to post in necro'd threads face facts you obviously child.
Remaking threads attracts more people as opposed to necro'd threads and the reasoning behind it is very obvious.

The time I start caring what other people enjoy or like is the time I will off myself as I quite frankly don't have enough fucks.
I'm quite tempted to, but even then that community is as garbage as this one at this point, both are cancerous.

It's actually the other way around, in re-created threads that have already reached a conclusion, people have little motivation. And please look at this whole deal logically, those two things are logically the same shit that seems like serving different purposes with the way you make them sound, but they aren't.

And again, you are free to go wherever you want, if you are unsatisfied with a forum you can change it, if you are unsatisfied with the internet, you can leave it and go out, if you are unsatisfied with your country, you can go somewhere else, but if you are unsatisfied with the world and it's society, which you are, there is nothing else you can do but to indulge yourself in life, because no one is supposed to change their beliefs to be accepted by you.

Aug 24, 2014 6:30 AM

#275

Burenai

Offline

Nov 2013

858

AnarchicSloth said:

Kronie said:
Opinions can be wrong, you cam at me with your mentality that there is nothing wrong with dead threads and necroing to which I corrected you.
This is why dead threads receive no posts even when necro'd, yet when a user remakes it, it floods with countless new replies until its inevitable lock up thanks to mods..

Opinion: "a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge". It cant be wrong or right, it's just an opinion. And yes, you provided valid points with the dead threads, regarding those with too many replies at least. And where did I say there is nothing wrong with dead threads and "necroing". I simply said it was stupid to worry about such trivial things, to which you helped me change my opinion. You didn't correct me, there was nothing to correct, you merely changed my mind.

Wow, you sound very intelligent (no sarcasm). Please inform me on what happens if that judgement is formed from incorrect/false information. Does that judgement still have no right/wrong? Please elucidate to me, oh intelligent one. Let me put a little example here. You say, "Smoking tobacco has no negative side effects on a human's physical health." And I respond to that with biological evidence that in fact it is bad for your health physiologically. Then is your judgement (opinion) not wrong? Is it right because it's just an opinion? Please explain.I could post a myriad of different examples and it wouldn't change much.

Here is the first web definition I found when I searched "opinion."
"In general, an opinion is a judgment, viewpoint, or statement about matters commonly considered to be subjective,"

They key word is "commonly considered to be subjective." That means, not every case is subjective and there are cases where it can be objective.

Oh and I like how you post that web definition with such high pride. As if it you're not making a complete fool of yourself. "a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge"
Key words "not necessarily."

Definition of necessarily: as a necessary result; inevitably.

So what happens when you put "not" before the word necessarily?
It's NOT a necessity. Which means IT CAN be based on facts or knowledge. And there is no right or wrong with FACTS. WOW! Amazing!!!

BurenaiAug 24, 2014 6:39 AM

Aug 24, 2014 6:34 AM

#276

Objurgo

Offline

Dec 2012

4478

MellowJello said:

LanaAqua said:
OP you joined a year too late.

2012 was indeed the best year, no joke.

Or maybe early January 2013. Hard to say.

The time when everybody tried to be 'The kings of their castle' made the best year my jello-y companion.

Aug 24, 2014 6:39 AM

#277

Offline

Jul 2014

1732

TaiyoToTsuki said:
Wow, you sound very intelligent (no sarcasm). Please inform me on what happens if that judgement is formed from incorrect/false information. Does that judgement still have no right/wrong? Please elucidate to me, oh intelligent one. Let me put a little example here. You say, "Smoking tobacco has no negative side effects on a human's physical health." And I respond to that with biological evidence that in fact it is bad for your health physiologically. Then is your judgement (opinion) not wrong? Is it right because it's just an opinion? Please explain.I could post a myriad of different examples and it wouldn't change much.

No, it's wrong. Why? because it's not an opinion, it's a statement. If he said "I think Smoking tobacco has no negative side effects on a human's physical health", then who are we to argue? You can give these people all the "facts" you want and they could simply reply with "What if the source of these facts are a lie?"

TaiyoToTsuki said:
Here is the first web definition I found when I searched "opinion."
"In general, an opinion is a judgment, viewpoint, or statement about matters commonly considered to be subjective,"

They key word is "commonly considered to be subjective." That means, not every case is subjective and there are cases where it can be objective.

I'm sorry but I haven't slept in like 25 hours so I can't answer this no matter how hard I strain my brain, I simply can't process the information.

I'M GONE NOW

Aug 24, 2014 6:42 AM

#278

Burenai

Offline

Nov 2013

858

AnarchicSloth said:

TaiyoToTsuki said:
Wow, you sound very intelligent (no sarcasm). Please inform me on what happens if that judgement is formed from incorrect/false information. Does that judgement still have no right/wrong? Please elucidate to me, oh intelligent one. Let me put a little example here. You say, "Smoking tobacco has no negative side effects on a human's physical health." And I respond to that with biological evidence that in fact it is bad for your health physiologically. Then is your judgement (opinion) not wrong? Is it right because it's just an opinion? Please explain.I could post a myriad of different examples and it wouldn't change much.

No, it's wrong. Why? because it's not an opinion, it's a statement. If he said "I think Smoking tobacco has no negative side effects on a human's physical health", then who are we to argue? You can give these people all the "facts" you want and they could simply reply with "What if the source of these facts are a lie?"

TaiyoToTsuki said:
Here is the first web definition I found when I searched "opinion."
"In general, an opinion is a judgment, viewpoint, or statement about matters commonly considered to be subjective,"

They key word is "commonly considered to be subjective." That means, not every case is subjective and there are cases where it can be objective.

I'm sorry but I haven't slept in like 25 hours so I can't answer this no matter how hard I strain my brain, I simply can't process the information.

Then atleast explain what I wrote in my edit:

"Oh and I like how you post that web definition with such high pride. As if it you're not making a complete fool of yourself. "a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge"
Key words "not necessarily."

Definition of necessarily: as a necessary result; inevitably.

So what happens when you put "not" before the word necessarily?
It's NOT a necessity. Which means IT CAN be based on facts or knowledge. And there is no right or wrong with FACTS. WOW! Amazing!!!"

Aug 24, 2014 6:58 AM

#279

Offline

Jul 2014

1732

TaiyoToTsuki said:

AnarchicSloth said:

No, it's wrong. Why? because it's not an opinion, it's a statement. If he said "I think Smoking tobacco has no negative side effects on a human's physical health", then who are we to argue? You can give these people all the "facts" you want and they could simply reply with "What if the source of these facts are a lie?"

I'm sorry but I haven't slept in like 25 hours so I can't answer this no matter how hard I strain my brain, I simply can't process the information.

Then atleast explain what I wrote in my edit:

"Oh and I like how you post that web definition with such high pride. As if it you're not making a complete fool of yourself. "a view or judgement formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge"
Key words "not necessarily."

Definition of necessarily: as a necessary result; inevitably.

So what happens when you put "not" before the word necessarily?
It's NOT a necessity. Which means IT CAN be based on facts or knowledge. And there is no right or wrong with FACTS. WOW! Amazing!!!"

I'll reply to this properly in probably 9-10 hours because I can barely figure out what you mean. A quick/guess answer is that an opinion is how you view something. Whether it's based on fact doesn't matter. I could say that "MAL is shit" and it wouldn't matter because there's no way to prove that I'm right or wrong (unless it is literally shit). You could support it with facts or other opinions but it's still subjective. Also, once again according to google, objective is define as "not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts."

Sloth-Aug 24, 2014 7:08 AM

I'M GONE NOW

Aug 24, 2014 7:23 AM

#280

Burenai

Offline

Nov 2013

858

I'll reply to this properly in probably 9-10 hours because I can barely figure out what you mean. A quick/guess answer is that an opinion is how you view something. Whether it's based on fact doesn't matter. I could say that "MAL is shit" and it wouldn't matter because there's no way to prove that I'm right or wrong (unless it is literally shit). You could support it with facts or other opinions but it's still subjective. Also, once again according to google, objective is define as "not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts."

The only issue with the reply you have given me is that you completely disregarded the two web definition, which one of them you included and supported. And gave me an example which is completely irrelevant, as I already mentioned that opinions can be subjective but can be objective, expressed through the deconstruction of the definitions. Facts can never be wrong by definition. So this statement is already invalid "You could support it with facts or other opinions but it's still subjective." If your debating a subjective matter with facts, then it's not subjective.

Aug 24, 2014 7:25 AM

#281