Write your takes in anime and I'll prove you're incorrect.

@ST63LTH Your assertion that no perfect anime exists at this juncture is an interesting hypothesis. However, the notion of perfection is inherently subjective and context-dependent. Some might argue that series such as FMAB or Neon Genesis Evangelion approach an ideal form within the medium, despite their perceived flaws. Thus, while absolute perfection may be unattainable, relative perfection is a matter of personal perspective.

Ok now we're getting somewhere, points that I can argue with. This is what I have been looking for for so long on this website, a reasonable argument to argue against!



Let's go over each part separately,

- You say that brotherhood follows the manga more closely, and I don't believe that matters. FMA 2003 is essentially a different story, even from the very first few episodes it was setting up for a different narrative, with the "truth" of brotherhood being replaced with flashes of the real world. I'm not sure if we see the truth in the manga too, but I am sure the flashes are a 2003 only thing. It was always meant to go a different direction.

You mentioned two reasons for why you consider that a bad thing "The lack of cohesiveness, and failing to capture the comedy". The first I do not get, both stories are complete, and "cohesive". Unless I'm not getting what you mean by that, that complaint does not exist as far as I'm concerned.

And now the comedy, there are 2 issues with this complaint.

1. you mention this as a bad thing because it's not like the manga, That's not a real complaint. 2003 is literally a different story that just starts the same. so not being like the manga is a nothing burger, it doesn't mean anything to this discussion.

2. The tonal whiplash of brotherhood with the comedy was something that I always disliked to begin with. It only lessens the serious moments. Even when I had only seen brotherhood, I never watched it for the comedy. So the constant jokes that were meant to "balance out" the darkness, only lessened the experience. Why would you want to lessen the strongest aspect of the show?

I don't remember fmab as the show with short Edward jokes, I remember it as this epic narrative of two brothers trying to fix the mistake of trying bring their dead mom back to life, a father dying on duty because he was too good at his job, soldiers feel of regret from killing innocent people in war, the fucking dog!!!!

I don't want these things to be "balanced out". And let's not lie about this, 2003 still has comedy. It's just not as much as brotherhood's. They didn't completely take them out or anything. They just toned them down, which I absolutely believe to be a good thing.


Then you talk about the world building, which I half agree with, Yes the inclusion of characters from other countries adds to it. and that would normally put brotherhood above, even if it's a fairly small difference. But on the other hand, the truth of a 2003 is a far bigger piece of world building than the truth in brotherhood. It's WAY bigger of a piece of world building that is both extremely interesting, and well explored. In fact, the "real world"'s relation was one of the very few things that didn't feel rushed in the movie.

Then you start talking about the things that are in brotherhood, and are good in brotherhood, that are missing in 2003. Which is true, but that is not a one sided argument. Lust's backstory which was one of the most powerful and well put together parts of 2003 is missing in brotherhood, and replaced by a version of lust that is extremely flat, Izumi's attempt to bring her kid back to life, is far more explored in the story, adding so much to her character in comparison to brotherhood. Sloth being the reincarnation of the brother's mother, made for some extremely powerful moments. Tucker who was originally a very solid plot device, is still that and so much more as a fully fleshed out character.

There are way too many differences between the two casts to compare all of them here. So that's not what I'm trying to do. My point here is that, both version of the story have good characters, arcs, and relations that are missing from the other. It is true that brotherhood has good elements that are missing in 2003 like the few things that you named, but that goes both ways.

We can sit here and compare every single one of them, but that would take WAAAAAAY too long.

now as far as the pacing goes..... I actually agree while having a fairly big "but".

While I think 2003 has some unnecessary elements that could have been cut out, and I agree that it lacks the rhythm that brotherhood has. I also think so many of the plot points from the start of brotherhood were a complete disgrace to how good they were in 2003. Everyone says the reason brotherhood rushed through them is because 2003 had already adapted those parts, but that's just a reason for why it's worse. It's still worse.

Specially the first arc with the false priest, that was originally my least favourite part of the entire story when I had seen brotherhood, so I was blown away by just how much better that arc was in the 2003 version.

But despite that, overall brotherhood does have cleaner pacing, so that is one of the things that I agree brotherhood does better than 2003.



I do think 2003 has some great fights, but overall I agree that brotherhood's action is far superior, so I don't think that's worth arguing.

What you fail to mention here is that while brotherhood does have better animation, 2003 has a far stronger sense of atmosphere which perfectly complements it's darker tone. Given what 2003 is, that atmosphere is as important to it, as the action is to brotherhood.

I also think while both version have a fantastic soundtrack, the ost from 2003 is even better. like have you actually listened to it? Both soundtracks are absolutely amazing, brotherhood's is this grand orchestra of an epic tale, while 2003s is this personal, deeply melancholic sound about two brothers trying to get back their body. This is a funny thing that everyone mentions, but Ironically, 2003 is more about brotherhood, than brotherhood.



The ending left you wanting more, but not because of logical consistency. I still have no idea what you are talking about.

That more also exists, it's the movie. It's sadly really rushed with so many of the things it's trying to do. but for what it's worth, it's not open ended anymore.

And I said this before, but for every character that was better used in brotherhood, there is one that was used better in 2003, again. so many things that made 2003 so good, are missing in brotherhood, and vise versa. It's not as simple as "this was good in brotherhood but 2003 didn't have it". That's a very biased way to look at it.



What?

Absolutely not, this is just absolutely wrong in every way possible. This is the first point you have made that I think is just straight up wrong.

The sloth of 2003 is a mother who tries to erase her children so she doesn't have to take responsibility of them or her feelings.

Lust is a girl who died in love, only to regain some of that humanity through that love. Now only living to fully regain her humanity.

Wrath is a child angry at his mother and the world for not wanting him.

Envy is envious that his father doesn't care for him unlike his half brother Edward.

Greed is a tricky one, cause 2003's is just a better version of the first greed in brotherhood. but also the second greed of brotherhood is peak, so.... yeah. but the first greeds are literally different versions of the same character, so if you complain, it also applies to brotherhood.

Gluttony is basically the same in both versions.

and pride..... ok I can see the argument for the pride in 2003 in being half baked relative to the brotherhood version. I'll give you that one.

But as for the rest, I think sloth, lust, and envy better represent their sin in 2003, greed, gluttony, and wrath are about the same in both version, and pride is better in brotherhood.

So no I absolutely do not think brotherhood's versions represent their sings better, are you kidding me? specially with lust, the 2003 lust is so above and beyond the brotherhood lust, That I would not even put them in the same league. It's not even close to being close to being close.




Oh believe me, you have not analysed father as much as me, none of these are new information to me. In fact I can write you an essay five times longer than this about why other people think father is a good villain. I actually have a ready to go mini essay that I have written a long time ago, due to how many times I have had to explain why I think father is a horrible villain.



So no, I don't like Dante more "because she is darker"

She is just as thematically relevant as father, while not having any of the problems that I have with father.

But there is more:

- Unlike father's perspective on life being the most generic philosophy that every god complex character has Dante's philosophy is actually interesting. He even makes Edward to be a hypocrite. The same guy who was blabbering about believing in something like god being idiotic, now refusing to except that the law of equivalent exchange isn't always true. Making her ideal an actual battle of perspectives against Edward

- While father had a connection with Hohenheim, to the brother's he was basically just the big bad. but in 2003, the brothers have a personal reason to hate her, because of how she manipulated the homunculus version of their mother.

- her theme song is so fucking good





FMAB was meant to be that, but FMA wasn't. they are different stories. And even then I would argue the comedy was one of the flaws of brotherhood to begin with.



What you did here is point out the things that brotherhood does better than 2003, a lot of which are true, while failing to see the things that 2003 does better. You are massively misrepresenting the qualities of 2003 by doing so.

By doing this, most of your points are "true". But they make an incomplete argument.

@APolygons2

While I understand your perspective, I still believe that the faithfulness of FMAB to the manga is significant. The manga's storyline is widely praised for its intricate plot, well-developed characters, and satisfying conclusion. By closely following the manga, FMAB ensures that these elements are faithfully represented, providing a coherent and complete narrative that aligns with the author's original vision.

On the other hand, FMA certainly offers a unique experience with its divergent storyline and philosophical undertones. However, the deviation from the source material means it lacks the comprehensive world-building and character arcs that make the manga and FMAB so compelling. In my view, the authenticity and richness of the manga's story, as captured by FMAB, offer a more fulfilling and cohesive experience.



I have to admit, I'm not a huge fan of the argument that FMAB comedic moments detract from its strongest aspects. In fact, I believe quite the opposite. I love how the comedic elements contribute to the overall narrative and enhance the viewing experience. Firstly, it's important to recognize that humor is a versatile storytelling tool that can serve various purposes beyond mere entertainment. In FMAB, the comedic moments are strategically place into the narrative to provide relief from the tension and darkness inherent in the story. Without the comedic relief, the show would be like a pressure cooker ready to explode. The humor offers a much-needed breather, allowing us to catch our breath and stay engaged with the story without feeling overwhelmed by the darkness. The comedy between characters like Edward, Alphonse, and Roy Mustang not only adds depth to their personalities but also strengthens their bonds as comrades and friends. These lighter moments humanize the characters, making them more relatable and endearing to us, which in turn fosters a stronger emotional connection between us and the story. Additionally, the juxtaposition of humor with more serious themes serves to highlight the complexity of the narrative. By seamlessly blending moments of comedy with moments of tragedy, It creates a nuanced and multi-dimensional portrayal of its characters and their world. I believe this tonal diversity adds depth to the storytelling, allowing for a richer exploration of themes such as sacrifice, redemption, and the consequences of ambition. So, why would you want to lessen the strongest aspect of the show? Because without the humor, FMAB wouldn't be the epic masterpiece that it is. It's the perfect blend of heart, humor, and humanity that makes FMAB a timeless classic. While you may prefer a more serious and somber tone in FMA, I believe that the inclusion of humor in FMAB is a deliberate and effective storytelling choice.






FMAB excel in certain areas where 2003 falls short, such as the inclusion of certain characters and plot points, but I acknowledge that 2003 also has its own strengths that are missing in FMAB. However the pros that FMAB has over FMA are just way too big like world-building differences. While I like the significance of the truth concept in 2003 and its exploration of the real world, I firmly believe that FMAB is miles ahead in world building. I believe that bringing in characters from different countries really pulls up the depth and richness of the world. It's like opening up a whole new world of cultures, politics, and ideas. And you know what? That broadens the story's horizons, making it feel more interconnected and expansive. With FMAB, we get to explore new territories, meet new factions, and dive into historical events that paint a fuller picture of the world our characters live in. FMAB delves into the intricacies of alchemy in greater detail, providing a deeper exploration of its principles, practices, and consequences.

Lust's Backstory: Sure, 2003 delves deeper into Lust's past, but FMAB still gives her character layers and intrigue, just in a different way. Exploring the character of homunculi in the context of shonen manga doesn't offer a wide array of directions which FMAB follows. Lust dying in FMAB sets off a whole domino effect. First, Gluttony loses it when he hears Mustang's name, chomping down on Ed, Ling, and even Envy. So, Ed's forced to pull a risky move and open the Gate of Truth to find Al's body. That kicks off a crazy chain reaction, leading Ed facing off with Father. In Brotherhood, sticking close to the manga means Lust's role is pretty streamlined. She's there to give Roy a reality check, mess with Havoc's day, and set Gluttony on a path of vengeance. Meanwhile, the 2003 version had to flex its creative muscles, beefing up Lust's storyline to fill in the gaps left by the source material.

FMA offers a more enigmatic and mysterious Izumi, leaving some aspects of her character and backstory to interpretation. This ambiguity adds layers to her persona, contributing to an air of intrigue surrounding her character. We don't get all the nitty-gritty details about her past and motivations. FMAB gives her the spotlight she truly deserves. We get to delve deeper into her past, her struggles, and her badassery, making her a more fleshed-out character overall. Izumi gets to shine with the same fierce determination and unwavering principles that made her a legend in the original source material.


Sloth in FMAB nails it as the epitome of laziness and lethargy. Sloth was arguably the simplest and most straight-forward out of all the Homunculi. He fully embodied his aspect of sloth and laziness, having only a desire for sleep and general immobility. Even in dangerous combat situations where his life was threatened, he was very reluctant to fight simply because it was too much work, even remarking that the act of living was also a pain.

Despite this he always followed orders from the other Homunculi and Father, showing that his indolence did not hinder him from fulfilling his duty. That did not stop him from voicing his opinions though, as he was shown to constantly complain about how much work he had to do.

Slow and simple-minded, Sloth did not have much preference for strategy or complex thought. He showed few emotions other than being discontent, though he was shown to be frustrated and angered when others prevented him from doing his tasks (and thus sleeping). These rare occasions would be the few times he would use his full strength and become dedicated to fulfilling his task, even showing something like determination to kill General Armstrong. The portrayal of Sloth in FMA deviates significantly from traditional interpretations of the sin. In the series, Sloth takes the form of a water-based entity that the Elric brothers inadvertently bring to life. Dante, then assumes custody of Sloth and places her near King Bradley. These departures from conventional representations of Sloth introduce inaccuracies and creative liberties into the character's portrayal.





For the first arc with the false priest, I get that it might not have hit the mark for you in FMAB, but for me, it still delivers some solid storytelling and character development. Plus, FMAB introduces some new elements and plot twists that keep things fresh and exciting, even for fans of the 2003 version. FMAB might rush through some plot points early on, but that's because it assumes people have already seen the 2003 version and are familiar with those story beats.




FMAB doesn't rely on a dark, edgy soundtrack because it's not that kind of anime. FMAB soundtrack boasts a diverse range of musical styles and genres, catering to a wide array of scenes and moods. From grand orchestral pieces to hauntingly beautiful melodies, each track contributes to the overall atmosphere and tone of the series, enhancing immersion and engagement.



Honestly, I was really let down by the ending of FMAB. I mean, jumping to another world? And Al forgetting everything? It just felt like a letdown after all the buildup. And the villains? Envy goes through the gate, Gluttony tries to take down his boss, and then poof, they're gone. What happened to all that tension? Weren't they supposed to be scared of her, considering how powerful she was supposed to be? And Wrath? He's just chilling like nothing happened. The concept of parallel worlds in FMAB didn't sit well with me; it felt rather nonsensical and out of place. In FMAB, the central theme revolves around Ed and Al discovering that despite the loss of their parents, they are not alone. They come to understand that they have a family among the people who love and support them. The series highlights Ed's journey of growth, as he learns to lean on others for help, love, and support, ultimately realizing the strength of the bonds he shares with his newfound family. The fact that you need to watch a movie to gain a deeper understanding of the ending of FMA only adds to the disappointment. FMA ending is that it left several plot threads unresolved, leaving us feeling unsatisfied and confused. Additionally, some fans felt that certain character arcs were rushed or lacked proper closure, diminishing the emotional impact of the conclusion.






Envy, one of the homunculi, embodies the sin of envy with his shape-shifting abilities, making him particularly dangerous and cruel. Throughout the series, he revels in killing humans and manipulating their emotions, as demonstrated by his impersonation of Maes Hughes' wife before killing him. While many may have felt relieved when he died, I couldn't help but feel a sense of sympathy for him throughout his journey. I can't help but empathize with him, feeling the weight of his envy and longing for something more. When he finally realizes the source of his bitterness, it's like a punch to the gut. I hate seeing him suffer, knowing that he's trapped in this endless cycle of jealousy and despair. But at the same time, there's a sense of understanding, a recognition of the human experience in all its complexity.


Wrath is way better in FMAB. One significant factor is the depth of character development and backstory provided in FMAB. In FMAB, Wrath's origins as King Bradley, a political figurehead manipulated by the homunculi, add layers to his character, making him more complex and intriguing. Additionally, FMAB explores Wrath's internal conflict as he grapples with his humanity and his role as a homunculus, providing a deeper understanding of his motivations and actions.

Pride is like the rest of his brethren as he hates humans. He sees them as worthless and pathetic however when faced with the brutal truth that he himself relies on humans to remain stable he becomes angry and shows the emotions he claimed were ‘nonexistent’.





I get where you're coming from, and you're right that I mainly highlighted the strengths of FMAB without giving much attention to what FMA does better. However, when it comes down to it, FMAB still edges out FMA in overall quality. While FMA certainly has its strengths, FMAB's superior pacing, character development, and adherence to the original manga source material make it the better series in many fans' eyes. That being said, both versions have their merits, and it ultimately comes down to personal preference. But if I had to choose, I'd still go with FMAB.

Tensura and Overlord are by far the most overrated shows ever made.
Both are simply the worst examples of "Brain rot written by an untalented idiot finding success due to the fans' absolute lack of media literacy".

@LenRea Why did you delete your other comment about the guy who deletes your thread to gaslight you? Also, stop trying to make yourself seem intelligent because you're not. Your first response was better, you didn't have to delete it and give me a google answer.

@AshuAmbrose I would not use the word overrated but I agree that That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime is a bad show. Here are several reasons why I considered it to be lacking:

1- Overpowered Protagonist: When I first started watching "That Time I Got Reincarnated as a Slime," I was intrigued by the unique premise of an ordinary person being reborn as a slime in a fantasy world. It seemed like a fresh take on the isekai genre, which has become saturated with similar stories. However, as I delved deeper into the series, I began to notice a recurring issue that significantly affected my enjoyment of the story: Rimuru's overpowered nature.

From the outset, Rimuru is granted an array of abilities that make him nearly invincible. The Great Sage skill, which allows him to analyze and understand almost anything instantly, combined with Predator, a skill that lets him absorb the powers and attributes of anything he consumes, sets the stage for an unstoppable protagonist. While it's initially exciting to see him grow stronger and acquire new abilities, this rapid power escalation quickly diminishes any sense of tension or challenge.

One of the primary elements that make a story engaging is the protagonist's struggle to overcome obstacles. In many fantasy and adventure stories, the hero's journey is fraught with difficulties, requiring them to grow, adapt, and sometimes fail before ultimately succeeding. This journey creates a connection between the audience and the character, as we root for them to overcome their challenges. However, in Rimuru's case, his overwhelming power means that he rarely faces any significant hurdles. Whenever a problem arises, he can usually solve it with ease, thanks to his vast array of skills.

This lack of genuine conflict is particularly evident in battles. In most fantasy stories, battles are tense and thrilling, with the outcome uncertain until the very end. The hero often has to rely on their wits, their allies, and sometimes sheer luck to prevail. However, Rimuru's battles tend to be one-sided affairs. No matter how formidable the opponent, Rimuru always seems to have the perfect skill or strategy to defeat them without breaking a sweat. This predictability drains the excitement from these encounters, making them feel more like routine exercises than epic clashes.

Moreover, Rimuru's power not only affects the battles but also the overall narrative. Because he can solve almost any problem effortlessly, the stakes in the story feel artificially low. Whether it's building a nation, negotiating with other races, or dealing with threats, Rimuru's abilities ensure that everything goes smoothly. There's never a real sense of danger or urgency because we know that Rimuru can handle anything that comes his way. This predictability makes the plot feel shallow and less engaging.

Another aspect worth mentioning is how Rimuru's power influences his relationships with other characters. In many stories, the protagonist's growth is mirrored by the development of their relationships. Allies become friends, friends become family, and these bonds are tested and strengthened through shared struggles. However, Rimuru's near-invincibility creates a power imbalance that affects these dynamics. His allies and subordinates look up to him with unwavering loyalty and admiration, but this often feels one-dimensional because they rarely contribute meaningfully to overcoming challenges. Rimuru's ability to handle everything himself leaves little room for other characters to shine or grow.

Additionally, Rimuru's overpowered nature impacts the themes of the story. One of the central themes of "Reincarnated as a Slime" is the idea of building a community and fostering cooperation between different races and species. While this is a noble and heartwarming theme, Rimuru's dominance undermines it to some extent. The success of his nation-building efforts often hinges on his abilities rather than the collective efforts of his people. This diminishes the sense of unity and cooperation that the story aims to convey.

The issue of an overpowered protagonist is not unique to "Reincarnated as a Slime." It's a common trope in many isekai and fantasy stories. However, what sets apart well-executed stories from less engaging ones is how they balance the protagonist's power with meaningful challenges and character development. For example, in "One Punch Man," Saitama's overwhelming strength is balanced by his existential crisis and search for meaning, creating a compelling narrative despite his invincibility. Unfortunately, "Reincarnated as a Slime" struggles to find this balance.

To be fair, there are moments in the series where Rimuru faces moral and ethical dilemmas, which add some depth to his character. However, these moments are often overshadowed by the ease with which he handles physical and tactical challenges. The lack of a credible threat or significant hardship makes it difficult to fully invest in his journey.

Furthermore, Rimuru's power level also impacts the world-building of the series. In a well-crafted fantasy world, the protagonist's abilities are often balanced by the rules and limitations of that world. However, Rimuru's skills frequently bend or outright break these rules. This inconsistency can make the world feel less immersive and believable. When the protagonist can bypass the established norms and limitations of the world, it reduces the sense of wonder and discovery that is essential to the fantasy genre.



2- Predictable Plot: One of the primary issues with the storyline is its formulaic pattern. From the outset, it becomes clear that the narrative follows a very structured and repetitive approach: Rimuru encounters a new challenge, he quickly overcomes it using his overpowered abilities, and then he gains new allies or resources as a result. While this formula can be effective in small doses, the series relies on it too heavily, causing the plot to become predictable.

Each new arc typically introduces a seemingly insurmountable threat or obstacle, only for Rimuru to effortlessly resolve it. Whether it's a powerful enemy, a political dilemma, or a natural disaster, the pattern remains the same. Rimuru's vast array of skills and powers ensures that he can handle any situation without breaking a sweat. This lack of genuine struggle or tension makes it difficult to stay invested in the story. As a viewer, I found myself anticipating the resolution almost as soon as the conflict was introduced, which significantly diminished the impact of these moments.

Moreover, the supporting characters and their development often follow predictable trajectories as well. New characters are introduced, usually with some initial conflict or misunderstanding, but they quickly come to admire and ally with Rimuru. This repeated pattern of conflict and quick resolution leaves little room for meaningful character growth or complex relationships. Instead of seeing characters evolve organically through their experiences, they often become part of Rimuru's ever-expanding entourage with little resistance or depth.

Another aspect that contributes to the predictability is the lack of lasting consequences. In many engaging stories, the protagonist's actions have significant and sometimes unpredictable repercussions. These consequences add layers of complexity and realism to the narrative, making it feel more dynamic and engaging. However, in "Reincarnated as a Slime," Rimuru's decisions rarely lead to lasting negative outcomes. Problems are resolved too neatly and quickly, with any potential fallout being addressed almost immediately. This absence of enduring consequences further undermines the stakes and tension within the story.

The world-building, while initially intriguing, also falls into a predictable pattern. Each new area or group that Rimuru encounters seems to follow a similar script: initial hostility or challenge, followed by Rimuru demonstrating his power or benevolence, leading to a peaceful resolution and new alliances. This repetitive approach to world-building makes the fantasy setting feel less vibrant and diverse. Instead of a rich tapestry of different cultures and conflicts, the world begins to feel like a series of similar challenges waiting to be conquered by Rimuru.

Furthermore, the overarching plot lacks significant twists or surprises. While there are moments of intrigue and some interesting subplots, the main storyline often feels linear and straightforward. The lack of unexpected developments or narrative risks makes it easy to predict the overall direction of the story. This predictability reduces the excitement and anticipation that come with following a more unpredictable and daring narrative.

Yaoi Shota Incest is superior to any kind of fapping material

@DesuMaiden Because if no one tells you what's wrong, you'll live in ignorance your whole life, and that's just wrong.

Of all three Yoshitoshi ABe's anime I saw, Lain was the weakest one.

It's Unfair + illogical to detest BNHA just because of the fandom

@eblf2013 I believe your approach to watching the anime might be off. Here are the steps to fully comprehend SEL:

1) Engage Actively: Instead of passively watching, engage actively with each episode. Pay close attention to details, symbolism, and character interactions.

2) Reflect on Themes: Take time to reflect on the overarching themes presented in SEL. Consider how they relate to technology, identity, and existentialism.

3) Analyze Symbolism: Analyze the symbolism and imagery used throughout the series. Look for recurring motifs and their significance to the narrative.

4) Research Background: Familiarize yourself with the background and context of the series. Learn about its creator, Chiaki J. Konaka, and the cultural influences that shaped SEL.

5) Discuss with Others: Engage in discussions with forums or online communities. Share your insights and interpretations, and consider alternative perspectives.

6) Revisit Episodes: Revisit episodes as needed to fully grasp complex plot points or thematic elements. SEL's layered storytelling may require multiple viewings for complete understanding.

7) Explore Supplementary Material: Seek out supplementary material, such as interviews, essays, or analysis videos, to deepen your understanding of SEL's themes and symbolism.

8) Consider Cultural Context: Consider the cultural context in which SEL was created. Reflect on how societal norms and technological advancements of the time influenced the series.

9) Embrace Ambiguity: Embrace the ambiguity and open-ended nature of SEL. Recognize that not all questions will have clear answers, and ambiguity is often intentional.

10) Trust Your Interpretation: Ultimately, trust your interpretation of SEL. Each person may perceive the series differently, and there is no definitive "correct" interpretation. Trust your insights and enjoy the journey of discovery.

You'll find reviews for each episode from 1 to 8, which you can watch after viewing each episode to enhance your understanding. It's crucial to watch the review after completing each episode.





Then when you finished these steps, you need to watch this review:




Then when you finished the review, watch the playthrough of the game.




In order to achieve a comprehensive understanding of "Serial Experiments Lain," it is imperative to meticulously repeat this process a minimum of 5 to 6 times. Only through such rigorous repetition can one truly appreciate the intricacies and beauty of this anime.

Attack on Titan is a horribly written cliched tropy immature shonen abomination with one dimensional characters and only relies on plot armor with no story

@Animeistaken History is replete with examples demonstrating that great animation does not necessarily make for a great anime. A quintessential example that illustrates this point is God of High School. While its animation is top-notch, the anime itself is lacking in storytelling and character complexity. It's a classic case of style over substance.

Call me an NPC but Spirited Away is the best Ghibli movie by far. It takes everything good about Ghibli movies and dials it up to the max. That is also the reason why it's the most popular one.

@Zimmu That depends on the overall content of the video. If someone makes anime jokes in the comments section of Pornhub videos, then yes, I would consider them stupid and cringey.

@Gashadokur0 nah bro that would make it 10 times funnier

Anime is great, except sometimes it is bad actually.

First off, this thread and the fact that you answer to all replies is insane, second of all, music anime is IMO the best anime genre we have at our disposal.

@AMBITZZ Picture this, you are in the zone, admiring a stunning Latina goddess, and then you make the mistake of checking the comments. Bam, The top comment is, Goku solos your favorite anime verse. Talk about a mood killer. I visit adult sites with certain anticipations regarding the content and mood and anime humor is not one of them.

Texhnolyze is one of the worst "elitist" anime ever created (dropped after 9 episodes of boredom and irritation) and would be much more watchable without the autistic mc. Why he just wouldn't die in episode 2?