not all opinions are equal and valid

poor deg getting poisoned by toxic queen again ^^'
*kawaisou*

Everyone can have opinions, but I'm trusting opinions on factual stuff that are based on rationality, logic and experience more than opinions that are based on emotions or are corrupted in any form, for example scientists that get paid by big pharma concerns to give their "expert views". When it comes to matters of the heart, rationality, logic and experience may not be everything, but focusing solely on emotions and being led by them would be folly.
Thoughts are absolutely free, but some thoughts better remain unspoken.

Age isn't a guarantor for emotional maturity. He's btw far from the only one. Honestly spoken, even when there are cases where I sympathize with what you write, I have seen from your style that you get overly emotional where it seems inappropriate given that you are not really close to any of the users. But you're still far from the level of delusions that other users including the one you mentioned have - over people who do not and likely will not ever cross paths in person
I btw highly recommend reading The Enchiridion by Epictetus and The Meditations by Marcus Aurelius, which can be a great inspiration

Ah, my dear interlocutor, while the notion of equality and validity in the realm of opinions may appear enticing at first glance, the intricacies of human thought belie such simplicity.

You see, opinions, much like the divergent paths of the multiverse, are shaped by a myriad of factors—personal experiences, cultural influences, and cognitive biases, to name but a few. Each individual traverses the labyrinth of existence through a unique lens, interpreting the world through the prism of their own subjectivity.

However, to assert that all opinions are equal and valid is to overlook the inherent complexity of human discourse. While all individuals possess the right to their own perspectives, the veracity and credibility of said opinions are subject to scrutiny and evaluation.

Consider, if you will, the analogy of scientific inquiry. In the pursuit of truth, hypotheses are rigorously tested, subjected to the crucible of empirical evidence and peer review. Similarly, opinions that withstand the crucible of critical analysis, rooted in reasoned argumentation and supported by evidence, may be deemed more credible than others.

Yet, let us not discount the importance of empathy and understanding in the exchange of divergent viewpoints. While opinions may vary in validity and merit, the recognition of each individual's inherent dignity and worth remains paramount.

In conclusion, while all opinions may possess intrinsic value to their respective holders, the discernment of validity requires discernment, critical inquiry, and an openness to the vast tapestry of human experience. As we navigate the labyrinth of discourse, let us strive for humility, empathy, and a genuine appreciation for the kaleidoscope of perspectives that enrich our shared journey through the cosmos.

It was obviously AI-generated... There were many giveaways, but I have also checked it on a couple of websites.

It was obviously AI-generated... There were many giveaways, but I have also checked it on a couple of websites.

@Noboru

It should be^^
But I guess you're right. One COULD be 40 and still behave like a pretentious, little boy - regardless. Agreed.

Then again, as I said: I hope that's not the case and he's just young. That would be more fitting, in my opinion...more..."normal"

@Merve2Love

There can be various circumstances and reasons for those over-reactions, for example: mental health issues, trauma, etc.

He doesn't seem to lie about his age and he already mentioned his issues multiple times. Stoicism might at last inspire people a little to try and focus on the things someone can control, which is the reactions. Of course, there can be underlying issues where professional or even medical help may be needed, but it's a waste of energy to over-react without anything to gain from it (related)

"Begin therefore from little things. Is a little oil spilt? A little wine stolen? Say to yourself, "This is the price paid for equanimity, for tranquillity, and nothing is to be had for nothing." When you call your servant, it is possible that he may not come; or, if he does, he may not do what you want. But he is by no means of such importance that it should be in his power to give you any disturbance."

edit: @Merve2Love: That's fair enough. My post was mostly directed to those who over-react to stuff like what others write on the Internet

2nd edit: @DreamWindow: It's not about creating the thread, but rather about the (over-)reactions in the thread. By no means do I want to excuse poor manners and antagonistic behavior with whatever possible underlying issues. I was merely giving the most-likely reason as to why some people seem to take things here too personal and too seriously. While I can sympathize, I do pity those more who are slaves to their own emotions and get worked up over stuff like having a different mindset. This implies that they feel way too strongly about the other persons or about this place in general. Otherwise, they wouldn't let it get to themselves that much that they can have lasting grudges for months or even years even when they're over 30. I mean, even most people that are 15-20 years younger are already emotionally much more mature
I once again highly recommend anyone with anger issues to read the two books I have linked

@Merve2Love

There can be various circumstances and reasons for those over-reactions, for example: mental health issues, trauma, etc.

He doesn't seem to lie about his age and he already mentioned his issues multiple times. Stoicism might at last inspire people a little to try and focus on the things someone can control, which is the reactions. Of course, there can be underlying issues where professional or even medical help may be needed, but it's a waste of energy to over-react without anything to gain from it (related)

"Begin therefore from little things. Is a little oil spilt? A little wine stolen? Say to yourself, "This is the price paid for equanimity, for tranquillity, and nothing is to be had for nothing." When you call your servant, it is possible that he may not come; or, if he does, he may not do what you want. But he is by no means of such importance that it should be in his power to give you any disturbance."

edit: @Merve2Love: That's fair enough. My post was mostly directed to those who over-react to stuff like what others write on the Internet

2nd edit: @DreamWindow: It's not about creating the thread, but rather about the (over-)reactions in the thread. By no means do I want to excuse poor manners and antagonistic behavior with whatever possible underlying issues. I was merely giving the most-likely reason as to why some people seem to take things here too personal and too seriously. While I can sympathize, I do pity those more who are slaves to their own emotions and get worked up over stuff like having a different mindset. This implies that they feel way too strongly about the other persons or about this place in general. Otherwise, they wouldn't let it get to themselves that much that they can have lasting grudges for months or even years even when they're over 30. I mean, even most people that are 15-20 years younger are already emotionally much more mature
I once again highly recommend anyone with anger issues to read the two books I have linked

True, but there is also no reason to act like a stuck-up snob who considers their own opinion as ultra superior and belittles others as if they were educationally subnormal.
I mean it's allowed to do that (rightfully so) but there is no reason to do it other than making oneself feel good by riding the high horse (not talking about you btw).

@Zarutaku Do you not realize that OP does the exact same thing? Or do you just ignore that because he's your friend or something? Just look at how he reacts to pretty much any dissenting opinion. He never actually tries to engage with the other side, he just wants his views validated, or to ridicule the other side for disagreeing. There's never an attempt at real discussion, just tribalism. But for some reason, it's only a problem when people give them a taste of their own medicine.

This is a matter of favouritism. OP can claim to be a smol bean who dindu nuffin because of his mental health problems, when he does all of the same things that those who are labeled "toxic" do. He literally asked for this user to be banned just because she's not basking in his mediocrity. The only one riding a high horse is OP, but nobody seems to have the self awareness to realize that it seems.

@DreamWindow I can agree on that, just not that OP is the only one. Both are on their own horse, armed with a lance and striking blows.

@deg why exactly did the "useless" topic get deleted? sorry for asking here, private message and profile comment is blocked.

@Zarutaku apparently the mods says it will attract trolls so bullying and suicide threads are not allowed anymore

@deg lol, I wonder how people are supposed to talk about bullying in Anime now because there are lots of these.

@deg lol, I wonder how people are supposed to talk about bullying in Anime now because there are lots of these.

One of the first things i learned in my philosophy classes in highschool is that not all opinions are equal. Some of them are wrong and harmfull and should not be allowed. That's all i've got to say

@Zarutaku I don't think it was the topic of bullying/suicide itself, but rather the question of "should useless people ... themselves?", i mean just answering "yes" to that question is bullying, pushing someone to do it

@DigiCat Probably, but that means it got deleted for wrong phrasing. If deg asked the same thing in a different way, then the topic still might be up.
This is forcing circumvention methods to ask an essentially equivalent question, which seems kind of redundant to me.

@trinitroglycerin Any examples of what got tought in your philosophy class?

?? I don't get what you mean by this 🤔

@DigiCat Wym tought? English isn't my mother tongue sorry.

@DigiCat Circumventing topic lock/deletion by phrasing the same question in a different way that does not lead to the aforementioned.

You can't dictate what opinions people are allowed to have. I can have whatever opinions I want, and there's nothing you can do to stop me.

@trinitroglycerin About this "not all opinions are equal. Some of them are wrong and harmfull and should not be allowed", what are the opinions you learnt in philosophy class that aren't equel and/or are harmfulland shouldn't be allowed?

That is not all you said, though. You said some opinions should not be allowed...but you have no way to enforce that.

@DigiCat Well for example something like "jews are an inferior species and should all be burned". Even though some people are still thinking this way nowadays it doesn't change the fact that it is objectively wrong. I'd say all opinions promoting hatred and violence are objectively wrong. Doesn't mean you're forbidden from having these opinions though.

And I am telling you that you are unable to enforce such tyranny upon others. It's nothing but a fantasy.

Here in the United States, we have freedom of speech. If you want to remove that, you will have to come here and fight us. Good luck. ;)

@Zarutaku Oh it means lock/delete

I still don't get how the question could've been phrased differently, considering the topic included a poll where you could literally vote "yes they should ..."

Speech is not a crime in the US, so someone would not be criminally prosecuted here for publicly saying that.

At most, they could be sued in a civil court and have to pay money to someone they caused damages to...but even that is unlikely to happen.