New
This topic has been locked and is no longer available for discussion.
Dec 14, 2017 3:40 PM
#51
Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. Grey-Zone said: All this means is that at most there will be less ".com" sites in the future, if I understood the issue correctly. No you're thinking of stuff having to do with ICANN. |
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
Dec 14, 2017 3:46 PM
#52
If your ISP is Comcast, any potential shenanigans don't start until next year when a "consent decree" expires. |
Dec 14, 2017 3:53 PM
#53
Dec 14, 2017 3:55 PM
#54
So it goes to the courts, we wait and see what judges think on who has the authority to -penalize-restrict fuckery from ISPs. Afterall, this only lessens the ability of offices*whose role it is* to "do anything" towards such companies when they are caught fucking with consumer rights. Small businesses that produce their own sites and who could become rivals to larger companies aren't protected as much; left with either being bought or snuffed out, if a highly rich company decides to do it. (think a class system for the web: rich companies benefit--less rich outta luck) I can understand both sides (though I believe one to be more beneficial) but I don't get the end game from those that wanted this removed if you're not a corporation-- this move primarily removes major deterrents for corporations that might engage in such behavior. The irony is it was an ISP that initiated the whole thing (Verizon) and it was an former Verizon lawyer that got rid of it. |
SilverstormDec 14, 2017 4:00 PM
"In the end the World really doesn't need a Superman. Just a Brave one" |
Dec 14, 2017 4:25 PM
#55
Dec 14, 2017 4:32 PM
#56
i am from country WITHOUT net neutrality... welcome to the 3rd world internet bitches! oh wait, at least, market competitiveness actually works in my country, and the one has lot monopoly is goverment owned, sooo... lulz https://www.eyerys.com/articles/news/indonesia-and-internet-neutrality-getting-away-it |
KumaDec 14, 2017 4:39 PM
Dec 14, 2017 5:24 PM
#57
traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? |
Dec 14, 2017 5:29 PM
#58
Nico- said: Net Neutrality didn't even exist before 2015. Nothing is going to change. Get off Reddit, stop fearmongering, and realize that you aren't going to have to start paying $0.99 per post on MAL or whatever the latest bugman myth is. You're such a frelling jerk. Shattering people's false realities like this. Let them be angry. Their ignorance amuses me. |
Dec 14, 2017 5:44 PM
#59
SpamuraiSensei said: Their ignorance amuses me. Your ignorance disgusts me, personally. If you think this won't do anything then I don't know what to tell you other than you're not paying attention. You really think ISP's will just do the right thing and keep everything at a fair playing field? Absolutely not. Get ready for internet sites and apps packages that you'll need to start paying for, just like how they package cable tv. Want to watch some yt videos? Sorry, that'll be a $1.99 per video unless you sign up for our cable/phone/internet/sites and apps package! https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNGlrABUIAAr9RO.jpg We're a lot closer to looking like this. Hope you like paying more for the same. |
Dec 14, 2017 5:47 PM
#60
Hias said: SpamuraiSensei said: Their ignorance amuses me. Your ignorance disgusts me, personally. If you think this won't do anything then I don't know what to tell you other than you're not paying attention. You really think ISP's will just do the right thing and keep everything at a fair playing field? Absolutely not. Get ready for internet sites and apps packages that you'll need to start paying for, just like how they package cable tv. Want to watch some yt videos? Sorry, that'll be a $1.99 per video unless you sign up for our cable/phone/internet/sites and apps package! https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNGlrABUIAAr9RO.jpg We're a lot closer to looking like this. Hope you like paying more for the same. You're funny. I like you. Let's be friends. |
Dec 14, 2017 5:48 PM
#61
worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. |
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
Dec 14, 2017 5:58 PM
#62
traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? |
Dec 14, 2017 6:03 PM
#63
SpamuraiSensei said: traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? Then why is there an article made in 2014? http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/27/technology/open-internet/index.html |
Dec 14, 2017 6:04 PM
#64
SpamuraiSensei said: traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? Corporations didn't fleece you much if at all before 2015 either. We're now in the era where corporate tyrants can get away with nearly everything due to Obama and Trump giving them too much power. |
Dec 14, 2017 6:08 PM
#65
WyNdZ said: This is the biggest fuck you video I've ever seen. Is this guy trying to get himself killed? The amount of death threats I've already seen towards him is insane. Yeah the guy is a serious dumbass no doubt about it |
Dec 14, 2017 6:09 PM
#66
waifu_stealer said: SpamuraiSensei said: traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? Then why is there an article made in 2014? http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/27/technology/open-internet/index.html Link to CNN. Fake news! |
Dec 14, 2017 6:10 PM
#67
Hoppy said: SpamuraiSensei said: traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? Corporations didn't fleece you much if at all before 2015 either. We're now in the era where corporate tyrants can get away with nearly everything due to Obama and Trump giving them too much power. Bro.. Bro... You already have to study your internet bills with your ISP. They like to toss in random charges. Nothing has changed. o3o |
Dec 14, 2017 6:16 PM
#68
SpamuraiSensei said: traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? Not too long ago, You used to get complete games too. Now even the AAA games are triple monetized or worse. The gaming industry is the perfect example of an industry that undergoes almost no regulation, and grossly abuses its customer base via their monetization schemes. It only took a decade for the slippery slope to become a precipice into the abyss in that Industry. I doubt anyone would have fathomed what would happen to games back in 2007. Hindsight is 20/20. I'm not saying that this will definitively fuck the internet over. I doubt any changes will happen immediately, but people will certainly have to be vigilant. |
Dec 14, 2017 6:23 PM
#69
SpamuraiSensei said: waifu_stealer said: SpamuraiSensei said: traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? Then why is there an article made in 2014? http://money.cnn.com/2014/02/27/technology/open-internet/index.html Link to CNN. Fake news! lol what response is that? |
Dec 14, 2017 6:26 PM
#70
You're right. We will now return to the internet before the net neutrality bill passed in 2015. Oh wait, it was the same fucking thing. |
Dec 14, 2017 6:28 PM
#71
Dec 14, 2017 6:28 PM
#72
still doing pretty good over here fuck your gay mainstream isps |
Dec 14, 2017 6:29 PM
#73
premium doesn't mean u can access they can block any particular sites they hate for whatever excuses using sonic too but the speed is raped by AT&T |
Dec 14, 2017 6:39 PM
#74
SpamuraiSensei said: traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? Look at the history of what companies did. They do all kinds of bullshit. |
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
Dec 14, 2017 6:41 PM
#75
To anyone who supports the repeal of net neutrality, fuck you :) |
Dec 14, 2017 6:50 PM
#76
WyNdZ said: This is the biggest fuck you video I've ever seen. Is this guy trying to get himself killed? The amount of death threats I've already seen towards him is insane. As long as he's making loads of money he has no worries. ^This is basically the FCC right now. |
Dec 14, 2017 7:14 PM
#77
FontSize72LOL said: SpamuraiSensei said: traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? Not too long ago, You used to get complete games too. Now even the AAA games are triple monetized or worse. The gaming industry is the perfect example of an industry that undergoes almost no regulation, and grossly abuses its customer base via their monetization schemes. It only took a decade for the slippery slope to become a precipice into the abyss in that Industry. I doubt anyone would have fathomed what would happen to games back in 2007. Hindsight is 20/20. I'm not saying that this will definitively fuck the internet over. I doubt any changes will happen immediately, but people will certainly have to be vigilant. Video games are for children. No self respecting adult plays video games. |
Dec 14, 2017 7:34 PM
#78
Hello darkness my old friend, I've come to talk with you again |
Dec 14, 2017 7:37 PM
#79
EXCELLENT!! Maybe now without your internet you people will go outside once in a while. |
Dec 14, 2017 8:07 PM
#80
SpamuraiSensei said: FontSize72LOL said: SpamuraiSensei said: traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? Not too long ago, You used to get complete games too. Now even the AAA games are triple monetized or worse. The gaming industry is the perfect example of an industry that undergoes almost no regulation, and grossly abuses its customer base via their monetization schemes. It only took a decade for the slippery slope to become a precipice into the abyss in that Industry. I doubt anyone would have fathomed what would happen to games back in 2007. Hindsight is 20/20. I'm not saying that this will definitively fuck the internet over. I doubt any changes will happen immediately, but people will certainly have to be vigilant. Video games are for children. No self respecting adult plays video games. I'm talking about the market, not the games themselves, but you knew that. Nice bait though. |
Dec 14, 2017 8:51 PM
#81
The intent is to provide citizens with a sense of pride and accomplishment for unlocking different websites. |
Dec 14, 2017 8:58 PM
#82
Ajit Pai is a bigger cunt than Martin Shkreli. |
Dec 14, 2017 9:01 PM
#83
Grow a peanut, will you |
Dec 14, 2017 9:11 PM
#84
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfLbSDyDiQw Important for everyone, but gamers will get the most out of this video. |
Dec 14, 2017 9:24 PM
#85
FontSize72LOL said: SpamuraiSensei said: FontSize72LOL said: SpamuraiSensei said: traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? Not too long ago, You used to get complete games too. Now even the AAA games are triple monetized or worse. The gaming industry is the perfect example of an industry that undergoes almost no regulation, and grossly abuses its customer base via their monetization schemes. It only took a decade for the slippery slope to become a precipice into the abyss in that Industry. I doubt anyone would have fathomed what would happen to games back in 2007. Hindsight is 20/20. I'm not saying that this will definitively fuck the internet over. I doubt any changes will happen immediately, but people will certainly have to be vigilant. Video games are for children. No self respecting adult plays video games. I'm talking about the market, not the games themselves, but you knew that. Nice bait though. You took it the first time. =P |
Dec 14, 2017 9:36 PM
#86
SpamuraiSensei said: FontSize72LOL said: SpamuraiSensei said: traed said: worldeditor11 said: traed said: Swagernator said: So will my porn now be slower or what ? And for a premium fee. Porn is no longer free. You're paying for it. What? I have to pay for my porno now? Well depends what your ISP decides to do. Have you paid for porno before net neutrality? Nope. Not unless you bought it on DVD. Before 2015, there was no net neutrality. You got along fine back then, right? Not too long ago, You used to get complete games too. Now even the AAA games are triple monetized or worse. The gaming industry is the perfect example of an industry that undergoes almost no regulation, and grossly abuses its customer base via their monetization schemes. It only took a decade for the slippery slope to become a precipice into the abyss in that Industry. I doubt anyone would have fathomed what would happen to games back in 2007. Hindsight is 20/20. I'm not saying that this will definitively fuck the internet over. I doubt any changes will happen immediately, but people will certainly have to be vigilant. Video games are for children. No self respecting adult plays video games. I am sure your trolling. but just incase also your current avatar wouldn't exist if it wasn't for games ;) |
GrimAtramentDec 14, 2017 9:41 PM
"among monsters and humans, there are only two types. Those who undergo suffering and spread it to others. And those who undergo suffering and avoid giving it to others." -Alice “Beauty is no quality in things themselves: It exists merely in the mind which contemplates them; and each mind perceives a different beauty.” David Hume “Evil is created when someone gives up on someone else. It appears when everyone gives up on someone as a lost cause and removes their path to salvation. Once they are cut off from everyone else, they become evil.” -Othinus |
Dec 14, 2017 9:48 PM
#87
I just watched porn on pornhub as always, nothing happened. I barricaded the entrance to my house tho. Let them come. |
Dec 14, 2017 10:03 PM
#88
waifu_stealer said: Nico- said: Net Neutrality didn't even exist before 2015. Nothing is going to change. Get off Reddit, stop fearmongering, and realize that you aren't going to have to start paying $0.99 per post on MAL or whatever the latest bugman myth is. lol fuck off dude, you don't understand the situation at all. Is Ajit Pai paying you to say that? Drunk_Samurai said: Soverign said: Drunk_Samurai said: Yeah it's really bad that a that a law that has existed since the beginning of the internet has been repealed. Oh wait. It was basically a law that stated the one ISP in your area you can pay for service to can't throttle your speeds in favor of other sites. Btw, they can already throttle your speeds for sites deemed illegal if they want. It is just I think most US ISPs don't give a flying fuck about Japan's Anime revenue. US broadband: Still no ISP choice for many, especially at higher speeds https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/08/us-broadband-still-no-isp-choice-for-many-especially-at-higher-speeds/ My point is that the internet has existed before that law existed. You don't need net neutrality. Yes we do you're so fucking ignorant on what will happen now that net neutrality is gone Tell that to 1991-2013. |
Dec 14, 2017 10:24 PM
#89
How many of you even knew about the 2015 law before September? |
Dec 14, 2017 10:27 PM
#90
Oh yeah, nothing will happen now, because they're going to stick that dildo up your pooper slowly until you get used to it, and then push it in another inch after you've gotten used to that. See you guys next year when you're begging for Net Neutrality laws to be re-enacted. |
Dec 14, 2017 10:29 PM
#91
Is less than 2 years even enough for a law to even change the market drastically? What actual improvements to the market can be derived from the 2015 law? |
Dec 14, 2017 10:33 PM
#92
Thrashinuva said: The law acts as a floodgate. ISPs will start experimenting with all sorts of stuff now. You can't trust businesses to see a potential market and not seize control of it. Is less than 2 years even enough for a law to even change the market drastically? What actual improvements to the market can be derived from the 2015 law? https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/04/13/2015-07841/protecting-and-promoting-the-open-internet Fairly certain this is the rule that was repealed. The history of man is to doubt the rules that were passed down to them, remove them, unleashing the horrors held in place, only to replace the rules and swear they will never do it again. |
Syrup-Dec 14, 2017 10:44 PM
Dec 14, 2017 10:41 PM
#93
Thrashinuva said: Is less than 2 years even enough for a law to even change the market drastically? What actual improvements to the market can be derived from the 2015 law? Look what went on before then. https://www.freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-violations-brief-history |
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
Dec 14, 2017 10:46 PM
#94
Syrup- said: Thrashinuva said: The law acts as a floodgate. ISPs will start experimenting with all sorts of stuff now. You can't trust businesses to see a potential market and not seize control of it. Is less than 2 years even enough for a law to even change the market drastically? What actual improvements to the market can be derived from the 2015 law? https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/04/13/2015-07841/protecting-and-promoting-the-open-internet Fairly certain this is the rule that was repealed. Yes, and that reclassifies it into this https://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/tcom1996.txt under Title I, which it was previous to 2015. The whole idea behind capitalism is for private business to experiment and sell their product or services in as much of the market as they can. The government's job is to ensure no monopolies form, and that no misconduct takes place. The 1996 law allows for any particular regulations the FCC decides, as long as they are legal. The FCC aimed for net neutrality long before 2015, which became a set of regulations that were partially repealed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_Open_Internet_Order_2010 |
Dec 14, 2017 10:51 PM
#95
traed said: Thrashinuva said: Is less than 2 years even enough for a law to even change the market drastically? What actual improvements to the market can be derived from the 2015 law? Look what went on before then. https://www.freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-violations-brief-history The date in which the article was written - April 25, 2017 "The FCC stepped in to sanction Madison River and prevent further blocking, but it lacks the authority to stop this kind of abuse today." Strangely enough, the rest of the examples don't list what happened after they were discovered. Whether or not any action was taken, and/or what kind of action it was. |
Dec 14, 2017 10:57 PM
#96
Thrashinuva said: Believe it or dont! I'm not really on either side, or on the fence about this. I've been watching people fight over this Net Neutrality stuff for 5 years now and honestly, nothing ever really happens. IMO The biggest thing that ever happened to the internet around that time was probably the FBI crackdown on MegaUpload, causing a massive shitstorm, destroying massive amounts of cloud data, and that wasn't even related to NN as far as I can remember. It's kind of tiring to see the shitstorm once every six months because they always try again next year. The FCC doesn't seem to give two shits about monopolies. Look at the current state of the internet industry. Up here it's almost similar, but at least we have the illusion of choice.Syrup- said: Thrashinuva said: Is less than 2 years even enough for a law to even change the market drastically? What actual improvements to the market can be derived from the 2015 law? https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/04/13/2015-07841/protecting-and-promoting-the-open-internet Fairly certain this is the rule that was repealed. Yes, and that reclassifies it into this https://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/tcom1996.txt under Title I, which it was previous to 2015. The whole idea behind capitalism is for private business to experiment and sell their product or services in as much of the market as they can. The government's job is to ensure no monopolies form, and that no misconduct takes place. The 1996 law allows for any particular regulations the FCC decides, as long as they are legal. The FCC aimed for net neutrality long before 2015, which became a set of regulations that were partially repealed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_Open_Internet_Order_2010 |
Dec 14, 2017 11:01 PM
#97
Syrup- said: Pretty much a meme campaign starts up every now and then, getting loads of people on board without 99% of them actually taking the time to research what they're being told. I remember it happening a few years ago, and a few years before that, and still even a few years before that. Yet no one ever understood what they were supposed to be angry about, merely that they were supposed to be angry.Thrashinuva said: Believe it or dont! I'm not really on either side, or on the fence about this. I've been watching people fight over this Net Neutrality stuff for 5 years now and honestly, nothing ever really happens. IMO The biggest thing that ever happened to the internet around that time was probably the FBI crackdown on MegaUpload, causing a massive shitstorm, destroying massive amounts of cloud data, and that wasn't even related to NN as far as I can remember. It's kind of tiring to see the shitstorm once every six months because they always try again next year. The FCC doesn't seem to give two shits about monopolies. Look at the current state of the internet industry. Up here it's almost similar, but at least we have the illusion of choice.Syrup- said: Thrashinuva said: The law acts as a floodgate. ISPs will start experimenting with all sorts of stuff now. You can't trust businesses to see a potential market and not seize control of it. Is less than 2 years even enough for a law to even change the market drastically? What actual improvements to the market can be derived from the 2015 law? https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/04/13/2015-07841/protecting-and-promoting-the-open-internet Fairly certain this is the rule that was repealed. Yes, and that reclassifies it into this https://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/tcom1996.txt under Title I, which it was previous to 2015. The whole idea behind capitalism is for private business to experiment and sell their product or services in as much of the market as they can. The government's job is to ensure no monopolies form, and that no misconduct takes place. The 1996 law allows for any particular regulations the FCC decides, as long as they are legal. The FCC aimed for net neutrality long before 2015, which became a set of regulations that were partially repealed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_Open_Internet_Order_2010 |
Dec 14, 2017 11:02 PM
#98
Ah, I think this is the straw that broke the camels back. Donald Trump's re election just went down the drain if this stick lol. Ajit Pai is such cuck. And please guys, provide why eliminating net neutrality is a good thing without saying that the internet had existed before 2015 as your only response? |
ThRippJckDec 14, 2017 11:10 PM
Dec 14, 2017 11:03 PM
#99
Thrashinuva said: traed said: Thrashinuva said: Is less than 2 years even enough for a law to even change the market drastically? What actual improvements to the market can be derived from the 2015 law? Look what went on before then. https://www.freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-violations-brief-history The date in which the article was written - April 25, 2017 "The FCC stepped in to sanction Madison River and prevent further blocking, but it lacks the authority to stop this kind of abuse today." Strangely enough, the rest of the examples don't list what happened after they were discovered. Whether or not any action was taken, and/or what kind of action it was. Thrashinuva said: traed said: Thrashinuva said: Is less than 2 years even enough for a law to even change the market drastically? What actual improvements to the market can be derived from the 2015 law? Look what went on before then. https://www.freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-violations-brief-history The date in which the article was written - April 25, 2017 "The FCC stepped in to sanction Madison River and prevent further blocking, but it lacks the authority to stop this kind of abuse today." Strangely enough, the rest of the examples don't list what happened after they were discovered. Whether or not any action was taken, and/or what kind of action it was. Action was taken in some of them I think. There is a relatively recent case with Verizon. https://www.rt.com/usa/397163-verizon-admits-throttle-netflix/ |
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
Dec 14, 2017 11:06 PM
#100
Thrashinuva said: No, they clearly know what they're supposed to be mad at. You can be sure people will push the "fuck go back" button when the Internet package meme becomes a reality. ISPs would probably never do that because it riles up the complacent farm animals they've spent years collecting. Syrup- said: Pretty much a meme campaign starts up every now and then, getting loads of people on board without 99% of them actually taking the time to research what they're being told. I remember it happening a few years ago, and a few years before that, and still even a few years before that. Yet no one ever understood what they were supposed to be angry about, merely that they were supposed to be angry.Thrashinuva said: Syrup- said: Thrashinuva said: The law acts as a floodgate. ISPs will start experimenting with all sorts of stuff now. You can't trust businesses to see a potential market and not seize control of it. Is less than 2 years even enough for a law to even change the market drastically? What actual improvements to the market can be derived from the 2015 law? https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2015/04/13/2015-07841/protecting-and-promoting-the-open-internet Fairly certain this is the rule that was repealed. Yes, and that reclassifies it into this https://transition.fcc.gov/Reports/tcom1996.txt under Title I, which it was previous to 2015. The whole idea behind capitalism is for private business to experiment and sell their product or services in as much of the market as they can. The government's job is to ensure no monopolies form, and that no misconduct takes place. The 1996 law allows for any particular regulations the FCC decides, as long as they are legal. The FCC aimed for net neutrality long before 2015, which became a set of regulations that were partially repealed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FCC_Open_Internet_Order_2010 |
This topic has been locked and is no longer available for discussion.
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
271 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |