Another political tyrant from the UN urges Japan to ban loli and the entire UN gets owned by Japanese netizens
| The useless nations are at it again and they brought an "activist" lawyer with them, but little did they know that this time the fans aren't having this re-fried dogshit they are spewing. Source The UN gets owned in this link I'm glad that some people have woken up and realized the threat their hobby and parts of their culture is under threat by tyranny. The UN does need to stfu, and stop trying to be useful, or if they wanted to be useful solve the migrant crisis before it's too late. |
 |
| lol the it's always funny when they criticize japan when they are one of the safest places to live in the world :P |
 |
| Just another cog in the machine. ("Cultural Progressive" machine that is) |
Otoshiro said: ichii_1 said: lol the it's always funny when they criticize japan when they are one of the safest places to live in the world :P this and when ignorant western sjws claim that japan is the rape capital of the world because of anime Not japan. That honor goes to Sweden. That's what you get for electing mentally defective leaders. |
 |
Otoshiro said: AFCLystad said: Not japan. That honor goes to Sweden. That's what you get for electing mentally defective leaders. I meant what the SJWs think not what normal people think Where does India rank? |
| I live in the UK, a country where loli related drawn artwork and illustrated literature are illegal. However, I will openly admit I break the law. Because if a law is unjust it deserves to be broken. Now, I can masturbate to a drawing of a six-year-old anime character in a sexual situation and find the abuse and exploitation of children abhorrant in the same way I can kill people in a video game and find murder utterly reprehensible. What we are talking about is something that is victimless. Although, really, the fact it's victimless doesn't actually matter. Here's an example: A person taking a walk in the park witnesses a child being molested in a wooded area. S/he goes home and proceeds to draw the molestation that was just commited. Should it be illegal to draw that? Should it be illegal to view it? Now what if I change the wording slightly? A person taking a walk in the park witnesses another person being brutally murdered in a wooded area. S/he goes home and proceeds to draw the murder that was just commited. Should it be illegal to draw that? Should it be illegal to view it? Both of these have a victim, nobody can consent to being murdered. Yet one is perfectly okay to draw, but one isn't? The West perpetually trots out this bullshit that it's all in the name of "protecting children;" when, really, it just boils down to the fact that those in charge, and "society" for that matter, just hate the fact that people exist with an attraction that they can't choose and that they can't abolish. Also, while I'm personally quite critical of laws that criminalize possession of photos and recorded footage of children in sexual situations, because it causes far more problems than it solves (e.g. those two NC teens), I do agree that those "junior idol" DVDs and photobooks are pure exploitation and should be criminalized. Along with those child "beauty pagents" the hypocritical U.S. has. |
| We're the same. Nuisances with nowhere to go. |
ichii_1 said: lol the it's always funny when they criticize japan when they are one of the safest places to live in the world :P Not what I hear from my female friends who live there and get stalked in the street regularly. |
Prophetess of the Golden Era  |
| I will laugh when they banned these; And actual sexual assault on children rises. (not the made up believe that cartoons tend to increase molesters) |
 |
| Why exactly are people going to the UN for all types of stupid ass complaints??? The UN is NOT some global authority that can change laws or for that matter do much of anything! We saw Anita and Ms. I fucked 5 guys to promote my shitty game go to the UN to cry about the evil people of the internet calling them names...as if the UN can do something about that. We saw that cunt Hermoine going to the UN demanding men should help women cuz reasons... And now we're seeing this shit... For fucks sake talk about a bunch of pathetic losers who actually think the UN is some magical policy entity... |
Gohadoken said: Otoshiro said: I meant what the SJWs think not what normal people think Where does India rank? Contrary to what some people with half ass knowledge here tend to harp on,its quite below some more significant countries. |
 |
JustALEX said: Why exactly are people going to the UN for all types of stupid ass complaints??? The UN is NOT some global authority that can change laws or for that matter do much of anything! We saw Anita and Ms. I fucked 5 guys to promote my shitty game go to the UN to cry about the evil people of the internet calling them names...as if the UN can do something about that. We saw that cunt Hermoine going to the UN demanding men should help women cuz reasons... And now we're seeing this shit... For fucks sake talk about a bunch of pathetic losers who actually think the UN is some magical policy entity... Wow man you must have a great relationship and view of women. |
Jigsy said: I live in the UK, a country where loli related drawn artwork and illustrated literature are illegal. However, I will openly admit I break the law. Because if a law is unjust it deserves to be broken. Now, I can masturbate to a drawing of a six-year-old anime character in a sexual situation and find the abuse and exploitation of children abhorrant in the same way I can kill people in a video game and find murder utterly reprehensible. What we are talking about is something that is victimless. Although, really, the fact it's victimless doesn't actually matter. Here's an example: A person taking a walk in the park witnesses a child being molested in a wooded area. S/he goes home and proceeds to draw the molestation that was just commited. Should it be illegal to draw that? Should it be illegal to view it? Now what if I change the wording slightly? A person taking a walk in the park witnesses another person being brutally murdered in a wooded area. S/he goes home and proceeds to draw the murder that was just commited. Should it be illegal to draw that? Should it be illegal to view it? Both of these have a victim, nobody can consent to being murdered. Yet one is perfectly okay to draw, but one isn't? The West perpetually trots out this bullshit that it's all in the name of "protecting children;" when, really, it just boils down to the fact that those in charge, and "society" for that matter, just hate the fact that people exist with an attraction that they can't choose and that they can't abolish. Also, while I'm personally quite critical of laws that criminalize possession of photos and recorded footage of children in sexual situations, because it causes far more problems than it solves (e.g. those two NC teens), I do agree that those "junior idol" DVDs and photobooks are pure exploitation and should be criminalized. Along with those child "beauty pagents" the hypocritical U.S. has. EDIT: what was once here was a string of kinda jackass sarcastic statements. I edited it out because I think this deserves an actual response. "Now, I can masturbate to a drawing of a six-year-old anime character in a sexual situation and find the abuse and exploitation of children abhorrant in the same way I can kill people in a video game and find murder utterly reprehensible." One implies an attraction to each other another doesnt. Almost everyone feels sexual attraction. Almost no one feels a need to murder another. If you are attracted to underage girls that attraction does stem into real life. "What we are talking about is something that is victimless. Although, really, the fact it's victimless doesn't actually matter. Here's an example: A person taking a walk in the park witnesses a child being molested in a wooded area. S/he goes home and proceeds to draw the molestation that was just commited. Should it be illegal to draw that? Should it be illegal to view it? Now what if I change the wording slightly? A person taking a walk in the park witnesses another person being brutally murdered in a wooded area. S/he goes home and proceeds to draw the murder that was just commited. Should it be illegal to draw that? Should it be illegal to view it? Both of these have a victim, nobody can consent to being murdered. Yet one is perfectly okay to draw, but one isn't?" Yeah because someone drawing a child getting raped is not a total violation of that childs privacy. "Also, while I'm personally quite critical of laws that criminalize possession of photos and recorded footage of children in sexual situations, because it causes far more problems than it solves (e.g. those two NC teens), I do agree that those "junior idol" DVDs and photobooks are pure exploitation and should be criminalized." The NC teens thing was a case were the judge forgot to be a fucking judge. Any rational judge would throw the case out. And no even if you occasionally get a situation like that they certainly solve more problems than they cause. (FYI im not saying you made this argument just that its a general one) I have heard many people claim that Lolicon is a more ethical alternative to keep there urges in check. Thing is thats not really how our brains work. As humans when we get a sense of pleasure from something we want to do more of it and we associate the stimulus that gives us that pleasure (a loli image) with that pleasure. We want to do more of it because our brain associates it with pleasure. |
dadnabflwqbekjOct 28, 2015 7:18 PM
megahobbit said: Jigsy said: I live in the UK, a country where loli related drawn artwork and illustrated literature are illegal. However, I will openly admit I break the law. Because if a law is unjust it deserves to be broken. Now, I can masturbate to a drawing of a six-year-old anime character in a sexual situation and find the abuse and exploitation of children abhorrant in the same way I can kill people in a video game and find murder utterly reprehensible. What we are talking about is something that is victimless. Although, really, the fact it's victimless doesn't actually matter. Here's an example: A person taking a walk in the park witnesses a child being molested in a wooded area. S/he goes home and proceeds to draw the molestation that was just commited. Should it be illegal to draw that? Should it be illegal to view it? Now what if I change the wording slightly? A person taking a walk in the park witnesses another person being brutally murdered in a wooded area. S/he goes home and proceeds to draw the murder that was just commited. Should it be illegal to draw that? Should it be illegal to view it? Both of these have a victim, nobody can consent to being murdered. Yet one is perfectly okay to draw, but one isn't? The West perpetually trots out this bullshit that it's all in the name of "protecting children;" when, really, it just boils down to the fact that those in charge, and "society" for that matter, just hate the fact that people exist with an attraction that they can't choose and that they can't abolish. Also, while I'm personally quite critical of laws that criminalize possession of photos and recorded footage of children in sexual situations, because it causes far more problems than it solves (e.g. those two NC teens), I do agree that those "junior idol" DVDs and photobooks are pure exploitation and should be criminalized. Along with those child "beauty pagents" the hypocritical U.S. has. You know I would break this down but its just to fucking funny. Keep on fighting the "injustice", you are the MLK of jacking off to CP. don't mention mlk white man. you are the ones who got him killed and enslaved my race. |
| from the link: "Maybe going after countries that actually traffic children first is a good idea…” qft. UN is wasting time and resources on a non-existing problem. |
| You can buy lossless digital music from your favorite Japanese artists on https://ototoy.jp/. The songs are all DRM-free and you can re-download your purchased albums as you wish. Show your support to your favorite artist if you can! ps. if you are looking for Japanese albums, you have to search it in Japanese (not romaji). Just copy and paste the name. For those who want to learn Japanese through anime Resources for learning the language |
megahobbit said: JustALEX said: Why exactly are people going to the UN for all types of stupid ass complaints??? The UN is NOT some global authority that can change laws or for that matter do much of anything! We saw Anita and Ms. I fucked 5 guys to promote my shitty game go to the UN to cry about the evil people of the internet calling them names...as if the UN can do something about that. We saw that cunt Hermoine going to the UN demanding men should help women cuz reasons... And now we're seeing this shit... For fucks sake talk about a bunch of pathetic losers who actually think the UN is some magical policy entity... Wow man you must have a great relationship and view of women. Actually I do. Feminists however....no, I don't have a good relationship or view of them. |
| I love that your idea of the "UN getting owned" is a bunch of lolicons raging online lol. You know, cause they're too cowardice to actually do it in public. |
| Yay! Free animated paedophilic paraphernalia for everyone! |
Fintan said: You act like gathering a huge mass of people in public for some cause for anything at all is easy.I love that your idea of the "UN getting owned" is a bunch of lolicons raging online lol. You know, cause they're too cowardice to actually do it in public. |
| ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
| just people thinking that they know shit which they actually don't, nothing unusual please spend your time on matters which are actually relevant UN-chan |
  |
| Even if they did it in public it would still be a huge minority and a group of undesirable people that the UN probably wouldn't mind pissing off. Most normals wouldn't give a fuck or would see it as a plus too. |
fuck everything and rumble |
traed said: Fintan said: You act like gathering a huge mass of people in public for some cause for anything at all is easy.I love that your idea of the "UN getting owned" is a bunch of lolicons raging online lol. You know, cause they're too cowardice to actually do it in public. Not my point, they didn't gather any amount of people in public lol, also my point was that them complaining online is far from "the UN getting owned". Also I'm annoyed by the UN not paying very close attention to the underage models being manipulated. That should come before the drawings, but as most you know I think both are bad. |
FintanOct 29, 2015 7:59 AM
Fintan said: If they cant get people to gather there would be no point in having just a few people show up somewhere. Although yeah Im not sure what would constitute it being considered ownage. Kind of depends on if they pay attention to it or not. Which they wont if its not like emails sent to them or something. more directtraed said: You act like gathering a huge mass of people in public for some cause for anything at all is easy. Not my point, they didn't gather any amount of people in public lol, also my point was that them complaining online is far from "the UN getting owned". Also I'm annoyed by the UN not paying very close attention to the underage models being manipulated. That should come before the drawings, but as most you know I think both are bad. |
| ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
Otoshiro said: Fintan said: I love that your idea of the "UN getting owned" is a bunch of lolicons raging online lol. You know, cause they're too cowardice to actually do it in public. They're lolicons simply because they disagree with the lawyer, of fucking course. No... They're lolicons for caring about and viewing lolicon hentai... Mod Edit: Modified quote of edited post. |
_Ghost_Oct 30, 2015 5:21 AM
| Just because someone is against something does not mean they are a part of the demographic it more greatly effects. By your logic all people who are pro gay rights are gay and all people who are for womens rights are woman. |
| ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
| Another thing to note. megahobbit said: Jigsy said: "Now, I can masturbate to a drawing of a six-year-old anime character in a sexual situation and find the abuse and exploitation of children abhorrant in the same way I can kill people in a video game and find murder utterly reprehensible." One implies an attraction to each other another doesnt. Almost everyone feels sexual attraction. Almost no one feels a need to murder another. If you are attracted to underage girls that attraction does stem into real life. Alot of people believe it or not find sexual attraction to murder. And alot of people that get angry, fantasies about murdering their the person who got them angry. Does that makes them murderers? No they did not perform the act! So why must lolicon be branded not only pedo but "child molesters"? They did not perform no sexual act on a child! Also the whole " If you are attracted to underage girls that attraction does stem into real life." Really? And with what proof? What is the logic behind this? Ask everyone lolicon out there and guaranteed that most would say their attraction towards 2D ANIMATED GIRLS DOES NOT STEM INTO REAL 3D GIRLS. This is the misconception that all loli haters have in their arsenal to combat the lolicons. Once again making blatant assumptions that just cause one likes a fake thing, it will transcend to real life. Sorry but only those who are mentally challenge and cannot split the difference between fiction and reality are the cause of that. Lolicons mostly and almost always prefers 2D girls over real ones. Only a few have any interested in talking to a real girl, however they know that liking little girl in real life is a crime! Like how dumb do you think lolicons are? Do you play GTA? I bet one day you went on a killing spree. Does this fake digital killing makes you a homicidal maniac? Hmm? Does playing FPS makes you a murderer? |
|
traed said: Just because someone is against something does not mean they are a part of the demographic it more greatly effects. By your logic all people who are pro gay rights are gay and all people who are for womens rights are woman. That's true, but some comments specify. Plus, remember these people were also defending the "clothing eroticism" with pre pubscent models... The "“Maybe going after countries that actually traffic children first is a good idea…" comment got to me. That person is either in denial, or genuinely thinks there's no children being trafficked for sex in Japan... Underage girls prostitute themselves openly in japan under the guise of "rent a date". Where underage girls, often runaways are allowed to work. The whole point here wasn't even about lolicon hentai, it was that it only fuels the acceptance of sexualizing children in Japan. Which IS TRUE. |
| Well, at least the old woman in the video doesn't have to fear rape. Unless she comes across a necrophile rapist. |
Otoshiro said: a few bad cases of degeneracy=how moral a country is. nice logic again. but thats how logic works around here..why are you surprised? Mod Edit: Modified quote of edited post. |
_Ghost_Oct 30, 2015 5:22 AM
 |
Fintan said: traed said: Just because someone is against something does not mean they are a part of the demographic it more greatly effects. By your logic all people who are pro gay rights are gay and all people who are for womens rights are woman. That's true, but some comments specify. Plus, remember these people were also defending the "clothing eroticism" with pre pubscent models... The "“Maybe going after countries that actually traffic children first is a good idea…" comment got to me. That person is either in denial, or genuinely thinks there's no children being trafficked for sex in Japan... Underage girls prostitute themselves openly in japan under the guise of "rent a date". Where underage girls, often runaways are allowed to work. That would still be a better idea than banning loli in any form or way. Yet, it's as if they don't give a fuck about real issues concerning children. The whole point here wasn't even about lolicon hentai, it was that it only fuels the acceptance of sexualizing children in Japan. Which IS TRUE. Says who? |
| Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Fintan said: The whole point here wasn't even about lolicon hentai, it was that it only fuels the acceptance of sexualizing children in Japan. Which IS TRUE. Which is not true! Sexualizing children in Japan is illegal! So it's not true sorry. |
|
Otoshiro said: elementkg said: Which is not true! Sexualizing children in Japan is illegal! So it's not true sorry. wait for the sauce (probably leftist propaganda though) How true that sound, doesn't surprise me in the least. |
|
| The UN is useless. Why are you worried? They really can't. |
 |
Otoshiro said: Fintan said: That's true, but some comments specify. Plus, remember these people were also defending the "clothing eroticism" with pre pubscent models... The "“Maybe going after countries that actually traffic children first is a good idea…" comment got to me. That person is either in denial, or genuinely thinks there's no children being trafficked for sex in Japan... Underage girls prostitute themselves openly in japan under the guise of "rent a date". Where underage girls, often runaways are allowed to work. The whole point here wasn't even about lolicon hentai, it was that it only fuels the acceptance of sexualizing children in Japan. Which IS TRUE. a few bad cases of degeneracy=how moral a country is. nice logic again All of you ganging up on me in these topics doesn't change the truth. A few bad cases lol You have no knowledge about underage prostitution and the sexualized pre pubescent modeling in Japan if you're saying it's just a few bad cases. That stuff is right out in the open, and most just ignore it. Do you think the modeling is ok? What's your opinion on that? Mod Edit: Modified quote of edited post and reaction to the response. |
_Ghost_Oct 30, 2015 5:23 AM
Fintan said: Otoshiro said: They're lolicons simply because they disagree with the lawyer, of fucking course. No... They're lolicons for caring about and viewing lolicon hentai... OK...so, I'm not a "lolicon", but I'll briefly explain to you why I defend it so much. I enjoy doujins....I read all kinds from many different artists. Most of the time it's about characters I personally like....most of these characters would NOT be considered "lolis"....others however are Borderline. The point is, that I understand that if we go down the path of banning "lolicon" eventually the stuff I like will most likely ALSO be targeted. I've already explained why there is nothing wrong with lolicon. Is Lolicon distasteful? Probably. But killing random people, sexually assaulting people, and doing other horrific things is ALSO distasteful and you can do all of that in VIDEO GAMES! Which is perfectly legal. Mod Edit: Modified quote of edited post. |
_Ghost_Oct 30, 2015 5:24 AM
Fintan said: Yeah, it might be true in some cases, but so what? That's like saying violence in games like CoD fuels acceptance of real warfare and guns. I think it's mostly and exaggeration though, liking loli hentai or violent games doesn't mean you lose all sense or moral. Theres not much to do about it either.The whole point here wasn't even about lolicon hentai, it was that it only fuels the acceptance of sexualizing children in Japan. Which IS TRUE. |
 |
JustALEX said: Fintan said: No... They're lolicons for caring about and viewing lolicon hentai... OK...so, I'm not a "lolicon", but I'll briefly explain to you why I defend it so much. I enjoy doujins....I read all kinds from many different artists. Most of the time it's about characters I personally like....most of these characters would NOT be considered "lolis"....others however are Borderline. The point is, that I understand that if we go down the path of banning "lolicon" eventually the stuff I like will most likely ALSO be targeted. I've already explained why there is nothing wrong with lolicon. Is Lolicon distasteful? Probably. But killing random people, sexually assaulting people, and doing other horrific things is ALSO distasteful and you can do all of that in VIDEO GAMES! Which is perfectly legal. I don't believe you. I think you do fap to lolicon hentai... Maybe you just don't want to admit to it, or you don't think you're a lolicon because that's not the only thing you fap to. Not sure, but I just don't believe you. :) Mod Edit: Modified quote of edited post. |
_Ghost_Oct 30, 2015 5:25 AM
Niddy said: Fintan said: Yeah, it might be true in some cases, but so what? That's like saying violence in games like CoD fuels acceptance of real warfare and guns. I think it's mostly and exaggeration though, liking loli hentai or violent games doesn't mean you lose all sense or moral. Theres not much to do about it either.The whole point here wasn't even about lolicon hentai, it was that it only fuels the acceptance of sexualizing children in Japan. Which IS TRUE. It's like the anti-lolicon people don't understand that video games exists and that they are making the exact argument that people like Jack Thompson and hell even Anita Sarkeesian are making. |
Fintan said: JustALEX said: OK...so, I'm not a "lolicon", but I'll briefly explain to you why I defend it so much. I enjoy doujins....I read all kinds from many different artists. Most of the time it's about characters I personally like....most of these characters would NOT be considered "lolis"....others however are Borderline. The point is, that I understand that if we go down the path of banning "lolicon" eventually the stuff I like will most likely ALSO be targeted. I've already explained why there is nothing wrong with lolicon. Is Lolicon distasteful? Probably. But killing random people, sexually assaulting people, and doing other horrific things is ALSO distasteful and you can do all of that in VIDEO GAMES! Which is perfectly legal. I don't believe you. I think you do fap to lolicon hentai... Maybe you just don't want to admit to it, or you don't think you're a lolicon because that's not the only thing you fap to. Not sure, but I just don't believe you. :) You can believe whatever the fuck you want. I'm not even hiding anything....go to my profile and I make available the types of doujins I enjoy. I even provide links. Mod Edit: Modified quote of edited post. |
_Ghost_Oct 30, 2015 5:26 AM
More topics from this board
Sticky: » The Current Events Board Will Be Closed on Friday JST ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Luna - Aug 2, 2021 |
271 |
by traed
»»
Aug 5, 2021 5:56 PM |
|
» Third shot of Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine offers big increase in antibody levels: study ( 1 2 )Desolated - Jul 30, 2021 |
50 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:24 PM |
|
» Western vaccine producers engage in shameless profiteering while poorer countries are supplied mainly by China.Desolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
1 |
by Bourmegar
»»
Aug 5, 2021 3:23 PM |
|
» NLRB officer says Amazon violated US labor lawDesolated - Aug 3, 2021 |
17 |
by kitsune0
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:41 PM |
|
» China Backs Cuba in Saying US Should Apply Sanctions To ItselfDesolated - Aug 5, 2021 |
10 |
by Desolated
»»
Aug 5, 2021 1:36 PM |