Forum SettingsEpisode Information
Forums
New
What did you think of this episode?
DO NOT discuss the source material beyond this episode. If you want to discuss future events or theories, please use separate threads.
DO NOT ask where to watch/download this episode or give links to copyrighted, non-fair use material.
DO NOT troll/bait/harass/abuse other users for liking or disliking the series/characters.
DO read the Anime Discussion Rules and Site & Forum Guidelines.
Pages (14) « First ... « 6 7 [8] 9 10 » ... Last »
Feb 21, 2015 3:45 PM
News Team
YEEHAW

Offline
Nov 2014
9806
robis798 said:
ABeautifulTable said:
slaine .... slaine .... slaine .... slaine .... slaine .... slai- STFU
But if she said Inaho 15x, you would've rejoiced right?

wait wut ? that would be fkin annoying hearing the princess repeating inaho's name too
Feb 21, 2015 3:45 PM

Offline
Jan 2014
103
The Martians are attacking as a team in a war, imagine that....
Feb 21, 2015 3:50 PM

Offline
Dec 2013
10536
ABeautifulTable said:
robis798 said:
But if she said Inaho 15x, you would've rejoiced right?

wait wut ? that would be fkin annoying hearing the princess repeating inaho's name too

So wait.

You don't like hearing Slaine-sama's name.

But you also wouldn't like to hear Inaho's name repeated multiple times.

Ahhhhhhh..?..???>>??

Feb 21, 2015 3:54 PM

Offline
May 2013
23919
Slaine x Ass OTP. Imahoe is a cockblocker that should be executed.
Feb 21, 2015 3:57 PM

Offline
Jul 2014
13353
Casval_onii-san said:
Slaine x Ass OTP. Imahoe is a cockblocker that should be executed.
You don't have to state the obvious.
Feb 21, 2015 3:57 PM
Offline
Jan 2015
127
[quote=fst]
ANGRY2011 said:
Actually, math is based on axioms, which are because some people said so.


mathematicians think what they do is pretty objective; read a few of these

https://www.google.ca/search?q=mathematicians+mathematics++objectivity&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=PhrpVJLXL9PjsASdvICYCA

You can't just declare a new axiom for the Peano arithmetic system. CAN NOT.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_axioms

you're correct, axioms are simply proposals; but that is when a system's first being developed.

A mathematician, call them "x" can start with his own set of axioms to develop whatever new system they're exploring.

If x publishes his system and colleague "y" shows (gives proofs) there are simpler axioms then community of professionals argues it out- argues the merits of the proofs and in the end the simplest axioms become the standard for the system "x" proposed.

It's roughly the same as science** - the argument between competent professionals produces a consensus that's supposed to weed out the errors that individual biases introduce.

** minus the experiments - if the system makes no claims about the real world there are no experiments to do
Feb 21, 2015 4:03 PM
Offline
Jan 2015
127
Casval_onii-san said:
Good and bad writing is axiomatic too


heh ... not like the term's used in math.

no way, no how, never.
Feb 21, 2015 4:08 PM
Offline
Jan 2015
127
Casval_onii-san said:
It is axiomatic. It doesn't need to be proven because it's so goddamn obvious. Jesus how dense are you people.


you contradicted yourself; before axioms were so because people just declare them so, now it's this.
Feb 21, 2015 4:10 PM

Offline
Jul 2014
2556
I think that there're practial laws of writing, and an experienced writer could formulate some more or less proveable principles, but it seems that we don't have one here.

But I think that while Inaho has a personality in sense that he is a person with some traits, there're problems with the writing of his character.

The first and the obvious being that he doesn't have flaws. The only one that is demonstrated is that he can be inconsiderate sometimes, but that doesn't affect his social life. Normally a character is given flaws to seem human.

The second issue I have is that he has no backstory. We know that he lost parents and lived with Yuki, but nothing more - that makes him seem a clean slate and contributes to the impression, that some have, that he is dull.

He doesn't seem entirely normal. His skills in science (and we don't know the exact number of fields, which doesn't help) are higher than those of most people. In the same time his face is inexpressive and his need for social interaction seems lower than that of the most people. That suggests savantism, autism or at least some sort of deviation, but despite being an interesting trait is has been written down as "he is always like this". But Yuki comments on his facial expressions, since they are not readable, so don't we need more attention towards his unique traits? You'd be interested, if you met a guy like him.

His social situation seems unrealistic. A person with stunted social behaviour is more likely to repel people, especially in teens, especially of opposite sex. And Inaho is show in the center of a group of friends. People in groups gather to interact, so he could be dragged around - hardly a center of attention.
People have argued that it' doesn't have to be like that, but when talking about people we usually address aour experiences. Mine is that louder, more energetic people attract friends more than quiet introverts. The latter are less noticed, cause they're quiet.

Inaho's progression is really subtle, as if in not really noticeable, compared to his counterpart in the plot. His appearance is almost unchanged, his outfit stays mostly the same. He became slightly more talkative, but it is not really much considering the time passed.
(Subjective note - I have to agree with those who say that him starting to giving encouragements rounds him up as an ideal character even more, so it doesn't seem to me as a good decision)

Inaho doesn't have introspection moments besides thoughts of Asseylum, so we don't know about his concerns, dreams, worldview or way of thinking (besides the love for eggs). The oly thing we know he is rational.

The writing doesn't do a good work of showing this basic trait. Or, more precisely, we are shown only the good side, while the scary side of overly rational person - the fact that you can get a lower priority in their eyes than some goal - is not touched upon.

He is not put in any context. We don't know of his relationship with command (the remark of him being not a team player was good, but it was singular and it is not developped). We don't see him interacting much with his peers - if it's a negative traits, they don't react to it. Only Inko helps. But more importantly we don't see him in the bigger picture of Earth defense forces (unlike, I am sorry, Slaine).

Inaho doesn't react to other people's actions much.

In short - we know very little of him, he has more negative traits than positive ones, and it's not really compensated with anything besides the action scenes.

Btw, I leave this as a a bait and go to sleep, sorry. -_- Gotta work to do tomorrow morning.
Feb 21, 2015 4:11 PM

Offline
Oct 2012
14691
awditty said:
Casval_onii-san said:
It is axiomatic. It doesn't need to be proven because it's so goddamn obvious. Jesus how dense are you people.


you contradicted yourself; before axioms were so because people just declare them so, now it's this.
How is it contradictory? Axioms exist because we take them for granted thus we don't need to prove them.
Feb 21, 2015 4:13 PM
News Team
YEEHAW

Offline
Nov 2014
9806
robis798 said:
ABeautifulTable said:

wait wut ? that would be fkin annoying hearing the princess repeating inaho's name too

So wait.

You don't like hearing Slaine-sama's name.

But you also wouldn't like to hear Inaho's name repeated multiple times.

Ahhhhhhh..?..???>>??




LOL dat gif !

well, slaine is a little bit better than inaho. its just hearing it 15 times it gets annoying. just that >_>
Feb 21, 2015 4:14 PM

Offline
May 2012
2832
Feaor said:
awditty said:


you contradicted yourself; before axioms were so because people just declare them so, now it's this.
How is it contradictory? Axioms exist because we take them for granted thus we don't need to prove them.

No there would be no need for mathematical proofs if this were the case, Axioms exist because they were proved to be correct therefore we now take them for granted. Axioms exist because of that proof, without that proof it would be nothing more than "because someone said so."

That proof is still required.
Feb 21, 2015 4:28 PM
Offline
Jan 2015
127
Feaor said:
awditty said:


you contradicted yourself; before axioms were so because people just declare them so, now it's this.
How is it contradictory? Axioms exist because we take them for granted thus we don't need to prove them.


fst said:
ANGRY2011 said:


WOAH WOAH WOAH.

Slow down man, I don't really care about anything else, but you can't just tell me anything where the word "judge" is used is as objective as math.

Math just is.


Actually, math is based on axioms, which are because some people said so.



the moon is made of blue cheese. I declare this an axiom, just because I (and some people) said so.

heh ... no


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom
As classically conceived, an axiom is a premise so evident as to be accepted as true without controversy.[1]

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Axiom.html
An axiom is a proposition regarded as self-evidently true without proof. The word "axiom" is a slightly archaic synonym for postulate. Compare conjecture or hypothesis, both of which connote apparently true but not self-evident statements.
awdittyFeb 21, 2015 4:35 PM
Feb 21, 2015 4:29 PM

Offline
Mar 2013
20064
awditty said:
fst said:
Actually, math is based on axioms, which are because some people said so.


mathematicians think what they do is pretty objective; read a few of these

https://www.google.ca/search?q=mathematicians+mathematics++objectivity&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=PhrpVJLXL9PjsASdvICYCA

You can't just declare a new axiom for the Peano arithmetic system. CAN NOT.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_axioms

you're correct, axioms are simply proposals; but that is when a system's first being developed.

A mathematician, call them "x" can start with his own set of axioms to develop whatever new system they're exploring.

If x publishes his system and colleague "y" shows (gives proofs) there are simpler axioms then community of professionals argues it out- argues the merits of the proofs and in the end the simplest axioms become the standard for the system "x" proposed.

It's roughly the same as science** - the argument between competent professionals produces a consensus that's supposed to weed out the errors that individual biases introduce.

** minus the experiments - if the system makes no claims about the real world there are no experiments to do


Fuck you, I'm going to make my own arthmetic system.

With blackjack and hookers.
Feb 21, 2015 4:37 PM

Offline
Mar 2013
410
I think Slaine is just wearing a Villan suit. He is not a real villan, but it's far for being a hero. After this episode I think he finally realized that he is going to loose what he wants the most (Asseylum) because of the things that he made (for a goal that we don't know yet). I don't think he is just a maniac that is trying to kill all the terrans, I think he is planning something. At least, I hope so. If Slaine is just a psycho with no plan, this show is gonna be the most pathetic thing ever. Personally I dont see another possible route for A/Z plot.
Peace without war (Asselyum's Uthopy) it's something impossible in the way things are right now.
Feb 21, 2015 4:37 PM

Offline
Jan 2011
26710
It was pretty funny seeing Slaine get all pissy when Inaho got mentioned.
Feb 21, 2015 4:37 PM

Offline
Oct 2012
14691
KamiAlice said:
No there would be no need for mathematical proofs if this were the case, Axioms exist because they were proved to be correct therefore we now take them for granted. Axioms exist because of that proof, without that proof it would be nothing more than "because someone said so."

That proof is still required.
That's not how axioms work, they're taken to be obvious so they don't have to be proven. Like for instance in Real Analysis we say that 0 is a natural number, you can't prove that by itself. You can't prove mathematics from the ground up as Russel and several others did so that's why axioms need to exist so we can take some things for granted.
Feb 21, 2015 4:37 PM

Offline
Aug 2014
4132
Slaine x Purple Hair Princess
Feb 21, 2015 4:40 PM

Offline
Aug 2014
314
Well, I just have one question about this episode:

What the hell are those trousers in 21:40? I mean, have you seen them? They're twice as wide as the guy wearing them. O.o
Feb 21, 2015 4:41 PM

Offline
Aug 2013
1400
Great episode, even showing a slow development showed many facts important for the development of the story, the princess wakes up but not recovered all memories still, ask myself whom Eddelrittuo supports, this may be an important point in the plot, I hope she is against Slaine

Finally the war will occur with full force, Inaho will have to be even more badass from now, he will face many enemies and not even know that the princess awoke, but he knows that regardless of what happens, only war will resolve ..
Feb 21, 2015 4:42 PM

Offline
Jul 2014
13353
OtoRozz said:
What the hell are those trousers in 21:40? I mean, have you seen them? They're twice as wide as the guy wearing them. O.o

out of all things you could complain about ....
Feb 21, 2015 4:43 PM
Offline
Sep 2014
165
julyachan said:
I think Slaine is just wearing a Villan suit. He is not a real villan, but it's far for being a hero. After this episode I think he finally realized that he is going to loose what he wants the most (Asseylum) because of the things that he made (for a goal that we don't know yet). I don't think he is just a maniac that is trying to kill all the terrans, I think he is planning something. At least, I hope so. If Slaine is just a psycho with no plan, this show is gonna be the most pathetic thing ever. Personally I dont see another possible route for A/Z plot.
Peace without war (Asselyum's Uthopy) it's something impossible in the way things are right now.

So basically he's an anti-hero
Feb 21, 2015 4:45 PM

Offline
Nov 2013
495
The real Hime-sama is finally back!!

Can't wait till she finds out what Slaine's been up to this whole time: http://i.imgur.com/NnoGhN1.gif

Also, that's one hell of a nice bath they have in Slaine's place.

And the Earth people are finally screwed now that the Martians have learned teamwork?
Feb 21, 2015 4:52 PM
Offline
Jan 2015
127
the professionals with relevant expertise argued it out and changed an axiom, or adopted a simpler set (this usually means a smaller set, Ockham's rule) of axioms that produce the correct results; Axioms do change, without needing to be proven or disproven.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_axioms

Peano's original formulation of the axioms used 1 instead of 0 as the "first" natural number.[7] This choice is arbitrary, as axiom 1 does not endow the constant 0 with any additional properties. However, because 0 is the additive identity in arithmetic, most modern formulations of the Peano axioms start from 0. Axioms 1 and 6 define a unary representation of the natural numbers: the number 1 can be defined as S(0), 2 as S(S(0)) (which is also S(1)), and, in general, any natural number n as the result of n-fold application of S to 0, denoted as Sn(0). The next two axioms define the properties of this representation.


Feaor said:
KamiAlice said:
No there would be no need for mathematical proofs if this were the case, Axioms exist because they were proved to be correct therefore we now take them for granted. Axioms exist because of that proof, without that proof it would be nothing more than "because someone said so."

That proof is still required.
That's not how axioms work, they're taken to be obvious so they don't have to be proven. Like for instance in Real Analysis we say that 0 is a natural number, you can't prove that by itself. You can't prove mathematics from the ground up as Russel and several others did so that's why axioms need to exist so we can take some things for granted.
Feb 21, 2015 4:54 PM
Offline
Jan 2015
127
fst said:
awditty said:


mathematicians think what they do is pretty objective; read a few of these

https://www.google.ca/search?q=mathematicians+mathematics++objectivity&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&gws_rd=cr&ei=PhrpVJLXL9PjsASdvICYCA

You can't just declare a new axiom for the Peano arithmetic system. CAN NOT.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peano_axioms

you're correct, axioms are simply proposals; but that is when a system's first being developed.

A mathematician, call them "x" can start with his own set of axioms to develop whatever new system they're exploring.

If x publishes his system and colleague "y" shows (gives proofs) there are simpler axioms then community of professionals argues it out- argues the merits of the proofs and in the end the simplest axioms become the standard for the system "x" proposed.

It's roughly the same as science** - the argument between competent professionals produces a consensus that's supposed to weed out the errors that individual biases introduce.

** minus the experiments - if the system makes no claims about the real world there are no experiments to do


Fuck you, I'm going to make my own arthmetic system.

With blackjack and hookers.


this set of axioms is not complete without vodka & pot
Feb 21, 2015 5:00 PM

Offline
Sep 2014
789
I think it is great we've spawned a full on axiom discussion over me essentially just inflating the point that there's no way someone thinks judging writing is as objective as mathematics.

Can we do something like this every weekend? I'm not even being facetious, I'm serious. This is way better than the usual discussion.
Feb 21, 2015 5:05 PM

Offline
May 2012
2832
Feaor said:
KamiAlice said:
No there would be no need for mathematical proofs if this were the case, Axioms exist because they were proved to be correct therefore we now take them for granted. Axioms exist because of that proof, without that proof it would be nothing more than "because someone said so."

That proof is still required.
That's not how axioms work, they're taken to be obvious so they don't have to be proven. Like for instance in Real Analysis we say that 0 is a natural number, you can't prove that by itself. You can't prove mathematics from the ground up as Russel and several others did so that's why axioms need to exist so we can take some things for granted.


I thought 0 being a natural number was widely disputed? I thought there was no universal agreement as to whether 0 was to be included as a natural number or not.
Anyway this conversation was derailed to much now.

ANGRY2011 said:
I think it is great we've spawned a full on axiom discussion over me essentially just inflating the point that there's no way someone thinks judging writing is as objective as mathematics.

Can we do something like this every weekend? I'm not even being facetious, I'm serious. This is way better than the usual discussion.


I kinda prefer a scientific experiment as to whether or not sex would be great in zero or low gravity
Feb 21, 2015 5:08 PM
Offline
Jan 2015
127
I don't usually muck with the quote and /quote tags but today I thought I would try trimming the depth of quotes - apologies if I mis-quoted anyone - leave me a PM if I did

ANGRY2011 said:
Can we do something like this every weekend? I'm not even being facetious, I'm serious. This is way better than the usual discussion.


I'm off to watch Ansatsu
Feb 21, 2015 5:08 PM

Offline
Oct 2012
14691
KamiAlice said:
I thought 0 being a natural number was widely disputed? I thought there was no universal agreement as to whether 0 was to be included as a natural number or not.
Anyway this conversation was derailed to much now.
Sure and that's why there are different sets of axioms, but you can't prove that 0 is not a natural number without axioms.
Feb 21, 2015 5:17 PM

Offline
Mar 2013
20064
ANGRY2011 said:
I think it is great we've spawned a full on axiom discussion over me essentially just inflating the point that there's no way someone thinks judging writing is as objective as mathematics.

Can we do something like this every weekend? I'm not even being facetious, I'm serious. This is way better than the usual discussion.


Don't forget about the hot, sweaty 0g cripple sex.
Feb 21, 2015 5:24 PM

Offline
May 2012
2832
Feaor said:
KamiAlice said:
I thought 0 being a natural number was widely disputed? I thought there was no universal agreement as to whether 0 was to be included as a natural number or not.
Anyway this conversation was derailed to much now.
Sure and that's why there are different sets of axioms, but you can't prove that 0 is not a natural number without axioms.
well you're right then in that sense, but isn't it a requirement for an axiom to be so self evident that it accepted without controversy? Which going back to what started this discussion, which was the objectivity/subjectivity of writing, doesn't that mean that writing can't be considered axiomatic? Since there is no universally accepted definition to what good writing is? The most we can hope for is widely accepted which is still based on subjective principles.
Feb 21, 2015 5:34 PM

Offline
Sep 2014
789
KamiAlice said:
I kinda prefer a scientific experiment as to whether or not sex would be great in zero or low gravity


fst said:
Don't forget about the hot, sweaty 0g cripple sex.


Right, right, I can dig it.
Feb 21, 2015 5:36 PM

Offline
May 2014
123
My face right now!


Holy shit. Holy, fucking shit!.
Feb 21, 2015 5:36 PM

Offline
Jul 2007
2780
Slaine Trollhard strikes again. Oh well I enjoyed this ep too~ It seems like he went down a path with no return. I expect a really drama heave ending. My guess is that both princesses are gonna die before/after Inaho-Slaines final battle. Oh well it's still way too soon for stupid guesses. Can't wait for more !!
Feb 21, 2015 5:44 PM

Offline
Oct 2012
14691
KamiAlice said:
well you're right then in that sense, but isn't it a requirement for an axiom to be so self evident that it accepted without controversy? Which going back to what started this discussion, which was the objectivity/subjectivity of writing, doesn't that mean that writing can't be considered axiomatic? Since there is no universally accepted definition to what good writing is? The most we can hope for is widely accepted which is still based on subjective principles.
I don't think you can necessarily expect an axiomatic system to be accepted with no controversy, even the ZFC formulation of set theory which is the most common axiomatic formulation of set theory has its detractors. There just has to be enough supporters and some solid reasoning behind the axioms you chose, I don't think its impossible to come up with a set of axioms for writing that can be used to judge writing more objectively.
Feb 21, 2015 6:11 PM
Offline
Sep 2014
165
Cloudy-Sky said:
Slaine Trollhard strikes again. Oh well I enjoyed this ep too~ It seems like he went down a path with no return. I expect a really drama heave ending. My guess is that both princesses are gonna die before/after Inaho-Slaines final battle. Oh well it's still way too soon for stupid guesses. Can't wait for more !!


If that happens and if Slaine and the emperor dies then who will run the vers empire?
Feb 21, 2015 6:12 PM

Offline
Apr 2008
11325
leelee619 said:
Cloudy-Sky said:
Slaine Trollhard strikes again. Oh well I enjoyed this ep too~ It seems like he went down a path with no return. I expect a really drama heave ending. My guess is that both princesses are gonna die before/after Inaho-Slaines final battle. Oh well it's still way too soon for stupid guesses. Can't wait for more !!


If that happens and if Slaine and the emperor dies then who will run the vers empire?


The empire will collapse one war or another.
Feb 21, 2015 6:12 PM

Offline
May 2014
123
Feaor said:
KamiAlice said:
well you're right then in that sense, but isn't it a requirement for an axiom to be so self evident that it accepted without controversy? Which going back to what started this discussion, which was the objectivity/subjectivity of writing, doesn't that mean that writing can't be considered axiomatic? Since there is no universally accepted definition to what good writing is? The most we can hope for is widely accepted which is still based on subjective principles.
I don't think you can necessarily expect an axiomatic system to be accepted with no controversy, even the ZFC formulation of set theory which is the most common axiomatic formulation of set theory has its detractors. There just has to be enough supporters and some solid reasoning behind the axioms you chose, I don't think its impossible to come up with a set of axioms for writing that can be used to judge writing more objectively.


Pardon my manors, but why the discussion about that subject?? in what way does it relates to the episode at hand?? Very respectfully, a tl;dr explanation would be awesome.
Feb 21, 2015 6:15 PM

Offline
Oct 2013
474
lablackmamba said:
My face right now!


Holy shit. Holy, fucking shit!.



This is getting to intense, man I love this show.

All hail Slaine.
    
   
Feb 21, 2015 6:16 PM

Offline
Oct 2012
14691
lablackmamba said:
Pardon my manors, but why the discussion about that subject?? in what way does it relates to the episode at hand?? Very respectfully, a tl;dr explanation would be awesome.
Someone else started talking about an axiomatic system to judge writing more objectively like mathematics and I just hopped on board because I'm a math nerd.
Feb 21, 2015 6:18 PM
Offline
Sep 2014
63
So...

Is it about time that the Earth Federation finally use their heads and use the Aldnoah Drives they've acquired to battle against the Orbital Knights?

Is it finally about time for Inaho to ditch his old orange Kataphrakt and use an Aldnoah machine to match up with multiple Orbital Knights?

Or is it just going to be Inaho killing three Orbital Knights by himself using the power of the invincible main character?

It doesn't make sense for a character like Inaho not to take advantage of his activation power or experiment with it. Maybe Inaho can place the multiple Aldnoah drives they've got in one machine and just kick ass like that.
Feb 21, 2015 6:42 PM

Offline
Aug 2014
337
Ah, once again I see through you Slaine. You pretend to want to conquer the Earth, unite the knights, create a new kingdom...but really you just want to kill Inaho, your rival for the Princess' affections, especially since she was recalling Inaho with that dreamy look on her face, "I went bird watching with him....le sigh"
https://twitter.com/LightningDash02
OTPs || MyAnimeList || MyMangaList || Favorite Guys || Favorite Girls || Favorite Anime


~LightningXDash02
Feb 21, 2015 6:44 PM
Offline
May 2011
38
SoonaxUchiha02 said:
Ah, once again I see through you Slaine. You pretend to want to conquer the Earth, unite the knights, create a new kingdom...but really you just want to kill Inaho, your rival for the Princess' affections, especially since she was recalling Inaho with that dreamy look on her face, "I went bird watching with him....le sigh"


Slaine a jealous prick.
Feb 21, 2015 7:06 PM

Offline
Apr 2014
53
Still hate Slain lol
Feb 21, 2015 7:10 PM
Offline
Apr 2014
83
KamiAlice said:
PancakesAndStuff said:

I find him the most interesting. Inaho being OP and somehow beating the "villian of the week" every time is just anti-climatic, and now that he's starting "smooth talk" like Kirito from SAO, it's starting to feel cringeworthy (ofc that's subjective). I'd much rather follow Slaine's story than follow Inaho's mundane formulaic path.

Finding Slaine more intersting is fine, but don't come up with BS towards the other character to justify your reasoning.

there were 4 mechs in season 1 containing 12 weeks worth of episodes.
there have been a total of 3 mechs introduced (besides Slaines) in now 7 episodes and the tactics have completely changed.
Do math right, that isn't even a new villian ever 2 weeks. Faulty criticism at it's finest.

"smooth talk" like kirito? What are you even talking about, Inaho hasn't smooth talked anyone, unless you consider lengthy monologues on physics/tactics smooth talking now.


When I say "villain of the week" I didn't mean it literally. I meant that these "villains" are treated like boss battles. And that's obviously not my main point, which was the fact that Inaho is able to beat these "villains of the week" with ease at all odds, even when his allies are being wrecked, and that's what makes things anti-climatic.

It gets quite annoying when people ignore the main points and find something much smaller to criticize, just so that they can say something back. Really. I'm not sure if you had that mindset when you typed that out, but it sure seems like it.

And I say "smooth talk", because that's how many of Inaho's girl friends react to many of his supposedly witty remarks.

Also, you should pay attention to the quotation marks I put up, because that usually implies something.

Faulty criticism at its finest.... right? I'm talking about you.
Feb 21, 2015 7:13 PM
Offline
Nov 2010
635
I feel like Slaine's situations is gonna blow up in his face and he's gonna have a meltdown, either because he can't the Princess or because the other Princess can't have him, or when the Princess finds out wtf's going on. Either way this upcoming battle should be interesting. The self-implosion, less so.

It always seems the same with mainline forces being over-confident and imcompetent at the same time in anime. It's like a general rule to make the protagonists look better...

But I wish they'd make more smarter generals like Balalaika from Black Lagoon and even she falls a little short. Gotta get some more Marine generals in the mix. lol.
yngtadpoleFeb 21, 2015 7:21 PM
Feb 21, 2015 7:15 PM
Offline
Sep 2010
155
TheUnbiasedOne91 said:
TIME TO DIE FOR THE REGULARS. INAHO CAN'T STOP THIS.

(if he does I am not watching anymore, if one of them don't die. They can't possibilly all survive this unscathed)


They probably will survive somehow anyways... lolol.

MonadoRudra said:
Good to see despite his doubts, Slaine eventually carried on with being 'Saazbaum's heir' instead of pursuing his comparatively much less interesting goal of 'being with the Princess' in S1.


Indeed. Slaine at least does more interesting stuff compared to Inaho, who just uses his millennium eye that lets him cheat and defeat another mook knight every battle.
Feb 21, 2015 7:27 PM

Offline
Apr 2008
11325
fimbu1vetr said:
TheUnbiasedOne91 said:
TIME TO DIE FOR THE REGULARS. INAHO CAN'T STOP THIS.

(if he does I am not watching anymore, if one of them don't die. They can't possibilly all survive this unscathed)


They probably will survive somehow anyways... lolol.

MonadoRudra said:
Good to see despite his doubts, Slaine eventually carried on with being 'Saazbaum's heir' instead of pursuing his comparatively much less interesting goal of 'being with the Princess' in S1.


Indeed. Slaine at least does more interesting stuff compared to Inaho, who just uses his millennium eye that lets him cheat and defeat another mook knight every battle.


Because Slaine doesn't use his future sight hax to stay alive in every fight he's in anyway. Oh wait. He does. Your kind's double standards are so hilariously bad.
Darklight0303Feb 21, 2015 7:31 PM
Feb 21, 2015 7:34 PM

Offline
Nov 2012
28
If Inaho somehow defeats every single enemy next episode without even one significant death in the crew, he'll officially be elevated to Shiba Tatsuya-level disgustingly overpowered. SASUGA ONII-SAMA. No, really, fuck Inaho. Turn hax off pls.

Either way, Slaine's being a little bitch this episode. Has to be expected, he's still shit, yet surprisingly still not the worst character on the show. Either way he doesn't fail to entertain me.

What worries me is that when oblivious blondie finally realises what Slaine has been up to, she won't be able to do shit cause he'll just lock her up (and the lolimaid as well, because why not) in the garden or some shit and proceed to marry the pinky cripple while resuming his plans for world domination.
...Except it'll never happen cause Inaho will rescue blondie, probably with the help of pinky cause she has betrayal written all over her.

Can't wait to watch the trainwreck, the buildup is real.
Feb 21, 2015 8:10 PM

Offline
Jun 2013
6123
Even though im not a big fan of Slaine, i found the reunion scene he had with the princess was pretty touching.
This is getting really good ^-^
Pages (14) « First ... « 6 7 [8] 9 10 » ... Last »

More topics from this board

» SPOILER - Question regarding the end of the anime

Joshuam303 - Apr 6, 2016

26 by Himitsu1237 »»
Nov 8, 9:17 AM

Poll: » Aldnoah.Zero 2nd Season Episode 12 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Mar 28, 2015

1158 by Archean-Return »»
Apr 21, 4:14 PM

Poll: » Aldnoah.Zero 2nd Season Episode 11 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Mar 21, 2015

831 by Archean-Return »»
Apr 21, 3:32 PM

Poll: » Aldnoah.Zero 2nd Season Episode 10 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Mar 14, 2015

581 by Archean-Return »»
Apr 21, 2:29 PM

Poll: » Aldnoah.Zero 2nd Season Episode 9 Discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )

Stark700 - Mar 7, 2015

1216 by Archean-Return »»
Apr 21, 1:56 PM
It’s time to ditch the text file.
Keep track of your anime easily by creating your own list.
Sign Up Login