New
Aug 30, 12:36 AM
#1
"Sensitive young men" is a term I've been hearing a lot lately, and for good reason: In centuries past, if you were wealthy, you had access to more "delicate" ideas, feelings, emotions. You would read romantic literature, be exposed to more delicate elements in theater, philosophy, etc If you weren't wealthy, well... your hands would be callous from the labor, your skin rougher and darker from the sun, and you likely wouldn't have had much in the form or formal education or access to culture. The rich had the privilege to be more "effeminate", to read and write poetry... and the poor would be admonished by their fathers if they showed signs of it. This made it's way into the advent of pop culture and mass media, the end result being that it took multiple decades for such concepts to get to the working man's mainstream. In Japan, romance manga for boys and men is a thing which started around the late-70's/80's and is very well established, but I've noticed that I would have a bit of trouble explaining the concept for someone who had zero contact with it. Even the term "Romance for a male audience" would probably make someone imagine a "Chad Thundercock" character seducing droves of women... they probably wouldn't imagine the colorful palette of Mikadono Sanshimai wa Angai, Choroi. nor it's girlish protagonist, nor the insecure protagonist of Kaoru Hana wa Rin to Saku which helps his mother's bakery. Most likely, if I showed those to them with no prior context, they likely would think it's for girls. What would be a nice way to explaining the concept? |
Aug 30, 12:40 AM
#2
Lovely girls falling for a dense guy. |
DesuMaiden said: Nobody resembles me physically because I don't even physically exist. |
Aug 30, 9:24 AM
#3
the answer is to just omit the "for a male audience" part, because a well written romance doesn't actually have a gendered target audience, even if serialized in a shounen or shoujo magazine. if someone looks at a romance anime and thinks it's "for girls", then they clearly have a bias towards romance as a concept and they just need to be sat down and made to watch some fucking good romance anime to break that bias. no point explaining when they probably can't imagine it anyway. |
krautnelsonAug 30, 11:23 AM
Aug 30, 10:40 AM
#4
thewiru said: Most likely, if I showed those to them with no prior context, they likely would think it's for girls. I wouldn't have thought these were for girls. |
その目だれの目? |
Aug 30, 11:13 AM
#5
"How would you explain "Romance for a male audience" to a western (Mostly American) audience?" Degrassi (which is a Canadian show I have never seen by the way) or something? Archie the comic book reboot from 2015 and its spin-offs (Jughead is my favourite) is a good example. It started quite good, but my interest shifted and I stopped following the whole franchise. And there's the live action Riverdale from CW which is trash and I recommend skipping on it. PS Actually there's even more simple and accessible answer - country music. |
alshuYesterday, 1:21 PM
Aug 30, 9:57 PM
#6
Aug 30, 10:05 PM
#7
I'd frankly avoid those conversations unless you want your friends to start avoiding you. They're gonna think you're one of those people. |
Aug 30, 10:54 PM
#8
Reply to XMGA030
I'd frankly avoid those conversations unless you want your friends to start avoiding you. They're gonna think you're one of those people.
XMGA030 said: They're gonna think you're one of those people. ...what people? This isn't a rhetorical question, I genuinely have zero idea of who you're referring to. |
Yesterday, 6:56 AM
#9
Reply to thewiru
XMGA030 said:
They're gonna think you're one of those people.
They're gonna think you're one of those people.
...what people?
This isn't a rhetorical question, I genuinely have zero idea of who you're referring to.
@thewiru Gooners. People so addicted to porn they mistake it for romance. |
Yesterday, 7:01 AM
#10
oh damn this topic heavy im gay i dunno |
🌈 i just want gintama back |
Yesterday, 7:39 AM
#11
Wiru.....I literally in the past have given you examples of romance novels aimed at men.....This isn't a foreign concept lol. Rom coms existed for men in the West in both novel form, and in films. Not as common today, though that has more to do with how the film industry has changed, and again it's flourishing in other formats like novels. The MCs also aren't "chad thundercock" (more likely to find that in female targeted romance fiction). Like seriously.....I am honestly thinking you are baiting at this point. These threads seem intentionally ignorant. For goodness sake, probably one of the most popular people from my country, in Jim Carrey, basically did rom coms that could be enjoyed by anyone (Yes Man and I would argue Liar Liar is one too), and were focused on the male perspective. In short they were male targeted rom coms. This is an old genre, and rom coms used to be for "universal" audiences, not targeted to one specific sex in the West. My favourite Christmas film is a rom com from the 1940s, that focuses on the male perspective, in Holiday Inn. The same actors would go on to make another Christmas rom com, that made the song White Christmas....this shit ain't new dude. Do you want to come off as an ignorant weeb? Are you just trolling? Are we going to see "how do you explain an action series to a Western audience" next? |
BilboBaggins365Yesterday, 7:52 AM
Yesterday, 8:06 AM
#12
Reply to BilboBaggins365
Wiru.....I literally in the past have given you examples of romance novels aimed at men.....This isn't a foreign concept lol. Rom coms existed for men in the West in both novel form, and in films. Not as common today, though that has more to do with how the film industry has changed, and again it's flourishing in other formats like novels. The MCs also aren't "chad thundercock" (more likely to find that in female targeted romance fiction).
Like seriously.....I am honestly thinking you are baiting at this point. These threads seem intentionally ignorant. For goodness sake, probably one of the most popular people from my country, in Jim Carrey, basically did rom coms that could be enjoyed by anyone (Yes Man and I would argue Liar Liar is one too), and were focused on the male perspective. In short they were male targeted rom coms. This is an old genre, and rom coms used to be for "universal" audiences, not targeted to one specific sex in the West. My favourite Christmas film is a rom com from the 1940s, that focuses on the male perspective, in Holiday Inn. The same actors would go on to make another Christmas rom com, that made the song White Christmas....this shit ain't new dude.
Do you want to come off as an ignorant weeb? Are you just trolling? Are we going to see "how do you explain an action series to a Western audience" next?
Like seriously.....I am honestly thinking you are baiting at this point. These threads seem intentionally ignorant. For goodness sake, probably one of the most popular people from my country, in Jim Carrey, basically did rom coms that could be enjoyed by anyone (Yes Man and I would argue Liar Liar is one too), and were focused on the male perspective. In short they were male targeted rom coms. This is an old genre, and rom coms used to be for "universal" audiences, not targeted to one specific sex in the West. My favourite Christmas film is a rom com from the 1940s, that focuses on the male perspective, in Holiday Inn. The same actors would go on to make another Christmas rom com, that made the song White Christmas....this shit ain't new dude.
Do you want to come off as an ignorant weeb? Are you just trolling? Are we going to see "how do you explain an action series to a Western audience" next?
BilboBaggins365 said: I am honestly thinking you are baiting at this point. These threads seem intentionally ignorant. Congrats, you have unraveled thewiru |
DesuMaiden said: Nobody resembles me physically because I don't even physically exist. |
Yesterday, 8:11 AM
#13
Reply to Zarutaku
BilboBaggins365 said:
I am honestly thinking you are baiting at this point. These threads seem intentionally ignorant.
I am honestly thinking you are baiting at this point. These threads seem intentionally ignorant.
Congrats, you have unraveled thewiru
@Zarutaku Eh sometimes I thought he was arguing in good faith, sometimes less so. If it is just a bit, it was well played for the effort he put in lol. He camouflaged it well. This is just dumb though, and more what I expect from bait threads. |
Yesterday, 8:16 AM
#14
by any chance did you mean harem anime? or selfinsert shit? blank mc garbage? eunuch propaganda? best girl loses every time: the anime? first girl rule fuckery? color coded archetype girls? "I like him because he's nice"? nobody wins because the author has no balls to write an ending? it's kinda hard to pinpoint now that I think about it. (yes I'm pissed about amagami. not even a confession or kiss, holy shit |
馬鹿げた倫理 全部ガラクタで |
Yesterday, 8:22 AM
#15
Male focused romance is essentially normal relatable guy x hot chic. This is true in any country. Not about chad picking up a gal. Average guy is not a tall chad. Female catered romance is about average everygirl having chads interest. You know Gojo from Dress Up Darling. He is very tall in which the author is a female. At the end of fmab the manlet shota mc becomes 6ft. That is shoujo. To get to my point, American men have the same romantic interest as Japanese, African, or any other nationality of men. The same is also true of women of all backgrounds. The simple proof is the fact that all the nonjapanese people here are enjoying anime. If japanese taste was exclusive, anime should not be popular at all. |
rohan121Yesterday, 8:36 AM
Yesterday, 8:32 AM
#16
Yesterday, 10:52 AM
#17
@BilboBaggins365 If someone who reads as much as me can't name any English language romance novels for men, the average person probably doesn't know of any either. |
その目だれの目? |
Yesterday, 11:14 AM
#18
Reply to giantpudding
@thewiru Gooners. People so addicted to porn they mistake it for romance.
@giantpudding Huh? Why would people have sex if they didn't love one another? |
Yesterday, 11:41 AM
#19
Lucifrost said: @BilboBaggins365 If someone who reads as much as me can't name any English language romance novels for men, the average person probably doesn't know of any either. If the average film goer doesn’t know about romance films targeting men, then I would question their credentials because it was a common form of film. The Jim Carrey ones I named are pretty well known. The novels are pretty niche, the films though aren’t. People understand that romance coms can be aimed at men, I don’t know what Wiru is talking about. |
BilboBaggins365Yesterday, 11:48 AM
Yesterday, 11:55 AM
#20
Reply to thewiru
@giantpudding
Huh? Why would people have sex if they didn't love one another?
Huh? Why would people have sex if they didn't love one another?
@thewiru Oh i'm sorry i thought this was about explaining your "Romance for a male audience" to a western audience |
Yesterday, 12:12 PM
#21
krautnelson said: , because a well written romance doesn't actually have a gendered target audience, even if serialized in a shounen or shoujo magazine. if someone looks at a romance anime and thinks it's "for girls", then they clearly have a bias towards romance as a concept and they just need to be sat down and made to watch some fucking good romance anime to break that bias It's pretty easy to tell shoujo/josei romance and shounen/seinen romance apart in anime. And it has nothing to do with the magazine of the manga. Tried hundreds of shoujo/josei romance anime, but I didn't particularly like any of them. The genre isn't for everyone. The one I liked "best" is probably Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso and that was a 4/10. Looks like it got published in a shounen magazine, but it's definitely a shoujo romance story. On the other hand, I also tried hundreds of shounen/seinen romance anime and found a few I really liked. For example Toradora and School Rumble. |
Yesterday, 12:24 PM
#22
Reply to BilboBaggins365
Wiru.....I literally in the past have given you examples of romance novels aimed at men.....This isn't a foreign concept lol. Rom coms existed for men in the West in both novel form, and in films. Not as common today, though that has more to do with how the film industry has changed, and again it's flourishing in other formats like novels. The MCs also aren't "chad thundercock" (more likely to find that in female targeted romance fiction).
Like seriously.....I am honestly thinking you are baiting at this point. These threads seem intentionally ignorant. For goodness sake, probably one of the most popular people from my country, in Jim Carrey, basically did rom coms that could be enjoyed by anyone (Yes Man and I would argue Liar Liar is one too), and were focused on the male perspective. In short they were male targeted rom coms. This is an old genre, and rom coms used to be for "universal" audiences, not targeted to one specific sex in the West. My favourite Christmas film is a rom com from the 1940s, that focuses on the male perspective, in Holiday Inn. The same actors would go on to make another Christmas rom com, that made the song White Christmas....this shit ain't new dude.
Do you want to come off as an ignorant weeb? Are you just trolling? Are we going to see "how do you explain an action series to a Western audience" next?
Like seriously.....I am honestly thinking you are baiting at this point. These threads seem intentionally ignorant. For goodness sake, probably one of the most popular people from my country, in Jim Carrey, basically did rom coms that could be enjoyed by anyone (Yes Man and I would argue Liar Liar is one too), and were focused on the male perspective. In short they were male targeted rom coms. This is an old genre, and rom coms used to be for "universal" audiences, not targeted to one specific sex in the West. My favourite Christmas film is a rom com from the 1940s, that focuses on the male perspective, in Holiday Inn. The same actors would go on to make another Christmas rom com, that made the song White Christmas....this shit ain't new dude.
Do you want to come off as an ignorant weeb? Are you just trolling? Are we going to see "how do you explain an action series to a Western audience" next?
BilboBaggins365 said: Do you want to come off as an ignorant weeb? Are you just trolling? Are we going to see "how do you explain an action series to a Western audience" next? I'm never "trolling", I have no reason to. If by "ignorant" you mean "You lack information", then yes, I do lack information about a lot of things. Such threads are inviting people who have that information to come here and add their two cents, I'm not here to "publish new dogma". In Do you like the "lack of movement" in anime? I argued that there's no way to argue for the superiority of the animation in TV anime compared to the animation of a renaissance Disney movie, but people in that threads brought arguments on how it could. |
Yesterday, 12:28 PM
#23
Reply to thewiru
BilboBaggins365 said:
Do you want to come off as an ignorant weeb? Are you just trolling? Are we going to see "how do you explain an action series to a Western audience" next?
Do you want to come off as an ignorant weeb? Are you just trolling? Are we going to see "how do you explain an action series to a Western audience" next?
I'm never "trolling", I have no reason to.
If by "ignorant" you mean "You lack information", then yes, I do lack information about a lot of things.
Such threads are inviting people who have that information to come here and add their two cents, I'm not here to "publish new dogma".
In Do you like the "lack of movement" in anime? I argued that there's no way to argue for the superiority of the animation in TV anime compared to the animation of a renaissance Disney movie, but people in that threads brought arguments on how it could.
thewiru said: Then don't make threads that require information you don't have? You are making a false assumption about media you don't consume, and wonder why some of these threads are kinda dumb? It would be like me asking "hey why doesn't anime make adult media?" in a film subreddit/forum. You are being willfully ignorant, about information you can easily find with a quick google search. IDMB has a whole list of male targeted rom com films. I'm never "trolling", I have no reason to. If by "ignorant" you mean "You lack information", then yes, I do lack information about a lot of things. Such threads are inviting people who have that information to come here and add their two cents, I'm not here to "publish new dogma". |
Yesterday, 12:32 PM
#24
Reply to BilboBaggins365
Lucifrost said:
@BilboBaggins365
If someone who reads as much as me can't name any English language romance novels for men, the average person probably doesn't know of any either.
@BilboBaggins365
If someone who reads as much as me can't name any English language romance novels for men, the average person probably doesn't know of any either.
If the average film goer doesn’t know about romance films targeting men, then I would question their credentials because it was a common form of film. The Jim Carrey ones I named are pretty well known.
The novels are pretty niche, the films though aren’t. People understand that romance coms can be aimed at men, I don’t know what Wiru is talking about.
@BilboBaggins365 I feel like Dawnson's Creek, Ruby Sparks, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, The catcher in the Rye, Career Opportunities, Can't Buy Me Love, 40 year old Virgin are not very famous. And people are not admitting being into jack black or adam sandler for some others. |
Yesterday, 12:34 PM
#25
Reply to BilboBaggins365
thewiru said:
I'm never "trolling", I have no reason to.
If by "ignorant" you mean "You lack information", then yes, I do lack information about a lot of things.
Such threads are inviting people who have that information to come here and add their two cents, I'm not here to "publish new dogma".
Then don't make threads that require information you don't have? You are making a false assumption about media you don't consume, and wonder why some of these threads are kinda dumb? It would be like me asking "hey why doesn't anime make adult media?" in a film subreddit/forum. You are being willfully ignorant, about information you can easily find with a quick google search. IDMB has a whole list of male targeted rom com films. I'm never "trolling", I have no reason to.
If by "ignorant" you mean "You lack information", then yes, I do lack information about a lot of things.
Such threads are inviting people who have that information to come here and add their two cents, I'm not here to "publish new dogma".
@BilboBaggins365 It should be obvious, but I don't have the information of which information I don't have. You're asking for the impossible if you want me to make threads where I know 100% in them. In fact, considering that all my threads finish with a question, that would be a contradiction. BilboBaggins365 said: You are making a false assumption about media you don't consume Wrong, I didn't even focus on western media here. My assumptions are about the views the average normie has. BilboBaggins365 said: It would be like me asking "hey why doesn't anime make adult media?" in a film subreddit/forum. I would ask them to define "adult media". Like... do they mean porn? |
Yesterday, 12:49 PM
#26
Reply to Sasori56483
@BilboBaggins365 I feel like Dawnson's Creek, Ruby Sparks, Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind, The catcher in the Rye, Career Opportunities, Can't Buy Me Love, 40 year old Virgin are not very famous. And people are not admitting being into jack black or adam sandler for some others.
@Sasori56483 .....What is your point? I am just saying rom coms aimed at men aren't a foreign concept, not that they aren't widely popular. People may not like or care about Adam Sandler rom coms, they know they exist though. thewiru said: Read the title of your own thread dude, and deduce why I brought this up. Wrong, I didn't even focus on western media here. My assumptions are about the views the average normie has. Eyeroll lol. Yeah I am pretty sure that is what people are discussing in cinephile spaces. Anyway I have seen comments like this and it's just as willfully ignorant as you are. |
Yesterday, 1:00 PM
#27
Reply to TransferUser
krautnelson said:
, because a well written romance doesn't actually have a gendered target audience, even if serialized in a shounen or shoujo magazine. if someone looks at a romance anime and thinks it's "for girls", then they clearly have a bias towards romance as a concept and they just need to be sat down and made to watch some fucking good romance anime to break that bias
, because a well written romance doesn't actually have a gendered target audience, even if serialized in a shounen or shoujo magazine. if someone looks at a romance anime and thinks it's "for girls", then they clearly have a bias towards romance as a concept and they just need to be sat down and made to watch some fucking good romance anime to break that bias
It's pretty easy to tell shoujo/josei romance and shounen/seinen romance apart in anime. And it has nothing to do with the magazine of the manga.
Tried hundreds of shoujo/josei romance anime, but I didn't particularly like any of them. The genre isn't for everyone.
The one I liked "best" is probably Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso and that was a 4/10. Looks like it got published in a shounen magazine, but it's definitely a shoujo romance story.
On the other hand, I also tried hundreds of shounen/seinen romance anime and found a few I really liked. For example Toradora and School Rumble.
TransferUser said: It's pretty easy to tell shoujo/josei romance and shounen/seinen romance apart in anime. only if you are familiar with the subject matter, but even then it's not always obvious. take something like Horimiya: technically a shounen, but there is nothing about it that would indicate it's "for boys". meanwhile Kaichou wa Maido-sama feels like shounen at times, but it's actually shoujo. and if you ignore the fanservice, My Dress-Up Darling is a shoujo with how much it focuses on cosplay, the female lead's point of view, the artstyle and how popular it is with female readers/viewers. this is what I mean when I say a good romance doesn't have a gendered target audience. TransferUser said: and what, if not the target demographic, makes it shoujo then? because the only thing that differentiates it from a typical shounen romance is that it's a drama rather than a comedy. it's not a reverse harem, it doesn't have a female MC, it doesn't have any of the stereotypical shoujo flourishes.The one I liked "best" is probably Shigatsu wa Kimi no Uso and that was a 4/10. Looks like it got published in a shounen magazine, but it's definitely a shoujo romance story. |
Yesterday, 1:04 PM
#28
Reply to BilboBaggins365
@Sasori56483 .....What is your point? I am just saying rom coms aimed at men aren't a foreign concept, not that they aren't widely popular. People may not like or care about Adam Sandler rom coms, they know they exist though.
Eyeroll lol. Yeah I am pretty sure that is what people are discussing in cinephile spaces. Anyway I have seen comments like this and it's just as willfully ignorant as you are.
thewiru said:
Wrong, I didn't even focus on western media here.
My assumptions are about the views the average normie has.
Read the title of your own thread dude, and deduce why I brought this up. Wrong, I didn't even focus on western media here.
My assumptions are about the views the average normie has.
Eyeroll lol. Yeah I am pretty sure that is what people are discussing in cinephile spaces. Anyway I have seen comments like this and it's just as willfully ignorant as you are.
BilboBaggins365 said: Eyeroll lol. Yeah I am pretty sure that is what people are discussing in cinephile spaces. Was that supposed to be ironic? Because some cinephiles I know unironically discuss pinku eiga. |
Yesterday, 1:26 PM
#29
krautnelson said: All three of them are shoujo, if you ask me.only if you are familiar with the subject matter, but even then it's not always obvious. take something like Horimiya: technically a shounen, but there is nothing about it that would indicate it's "for boys". meanwhile Kaichou wa Maido-sama feels like shounen at times, but it's actually shoujo. and if you ignore the fanservice, My Dress-Up Darling is a shoujo with how much it focuses on cosplay, the female lead's point of view, the artstyle and how popular it is with female readers/viewers. this is what I mean when I say a good romance doesn't have a gendered target audience. krautnelson said: Narrative structure, style and tropes. and what, if not the target demographic, makes it shoujo then? because the only thing that differentiates it from a typical shounen romance is that it's a drama rather than a comedy. it's not a reverse harem, it doesn't have a female MC, it doesn't have any of the stereotypical shoujo flourishes. Josee to Tora to Sakana-tachi is a Seinen romantic drama. Though, hilariously that one was published in a Josei magazine. The magazine is really useless when it comes to categorizing this stuff. Though, judging by some pictures of the manga it seems the anime just changed it from Josei into Seinen. Changing style is pretty easy: |
TransferUserYesterday, 1:30 PM
Yesterday, 2:24 PM
#30
Reply to TransferUser
krautnelson said:
only if you are familiar with the subject matter, but even then it's not always obvious.
take something like Horimiya: technically a shounen, but there is nothing about it that would indicate it's "for boys". meanwhile Kaichou wa Maido-sama feels like shounen at times, but it's actually shoujo. and if you ignore the fanservice, My Dress-Up Darling is a shoujo with how much it focuses on cosplay, the female lead's point of view, the artstyle and how popular it is with female readers/viewers. this is what I mean when I say a good romance doesn't have a gendered target audience.
All three of them are shoujo, if you ask me.only if you are familiar with the subject matter, but even then it's not always obvious.
take something like Horimiya: technically a shounen, but there is nothing about it that would indicate it's "for boys". meanwhile Kaichou wa Maido-sama feels like shounen at times, but it's actually shoujo. and if you ignore the fanservice, My Dress-Up Darling is a shoujo with how much it focuses on cosplay, the female lead's point of view, the artstyle and how popular it is with female readers/viewers. this is what I mean when I say a good romance doesn't have a gendered target audience.
krautnelson said:
and what, if not the target demographic, makes it shoujo then? because the only thing that differentiates it from a typical shounen romance is that it's a drama rather than a comedy. it's not a reverse harem, it doesn't have a female MC, it doesn't have any of the stereotypical shoujo flourishes.
Narrative structure, style and tropes. and what, if not the target demographic, makes it shoujo then? because the only thing that differentiates it from a typical shounen romance is that it's a drama rather than a comedy. it's not a reverse harem, it doesn't have a female MC, it doesn't have any of the stereotypical shoujo flourishes.
Josee to Tora to Sakana-tachi is a Seinen romantic drama. Though, hilariously that one was published in a Josei magazine. The magazine is really useless when it comes to categorizing this stuff. Though, judging by some pictures of the manga it seems the anime just changed it from Josei into Seinen.
Changing style is pretty easy:
TransferUser said: can you be more specific? what "narrative structure" makes a romance shounen or shoujo?Narrative structure, style and tropes. |
Yesterday, 3:21 PM
#31
You really only see romances directed just at females when it is a pure romance or clearly directed toward teenage girls but even the later brings in a fair number of males into it. RomComs often are directed at males as much as females with exception of Hallmark and Lifetime made for TV movies. RomComs are too easy so what about something like The Fountain? That movie while not specifically targeting males im sure drew in plenty, written by a male and centred an a male lead. There also are some movies not well liked I think can appeal to some males such as Waiting for Forever, a male focused lead who is cute-stalking a girl he likes from afar and gets shit for it at one point in the film straight up accused of murdering someone because they think he's weird. Also I think Wristcutters: A Love Story drew in males. It was directed by a male based on a short story written by a male with a male lead. |
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
Yesterday, 3:25 PM
#32
@BilboBaggins365 "I don't know how to explain, romance to a barbarian truck driver from the 1950's. What is the appeal of gentle, introverted, androgymnous looking, able to glaze cakes, characters to male?" It is the Adam Sandler formula, good looking girl, plain person feels unique and special for being gentle and around good looking girl. plain person discovers that being themselves involves struggling against being themselves. |
Yesterday, 4:10 PM
#33
Reply to Lucifrost
@BilboBaggins365
If someone who reads as much as me can't name any English language romance novels for men, the average person probably doesn't know of any either.
If someone who reads as much as me can't name any English language romance novels for men, the average person probably doesn't know of any either.
@Lucifrost Couldn't you technically just go back to when all literature in the West was written exclusively for male consumption? Shakespeare? Greek tragedy? In response to OP's point, Shakespeare's male protagonists are nothing if not "sensitive young men" for the most part. 😂 |
Yesterday, 4:36 PM
#34
Reply to traed
You really only see romances directed just at females when it is a pure romance or clearly directed toward teenage girls but even the later brings in a fair number of males into it. RomComs often are directed at males as much as females with exception of Hallmark and Lifetime made for TV movies. RomComs are too easy so what about something like The Fountain? That movie while not specifically targeting males im sure drew in plenty, written by a male and centred an a male lead. There also are some movies not well liked I think can appeal to some males such as Waiting for Forever, a male focused lead who is cute-stalking a girl he likes from afar and gets shit for it at one point in the film straight up accused of murdering someone because they think he's weird. Also I think Wristcutters: A Love Story drew in males. It was directed by a male based on a short story written by a male with a male lead.
@traed I remember my mom amd some coworkers really liked hallmark while every guy in my family thought it was watching paint dry. It is funny noticing the common patterns in those movies, and it reminded me of this vid. |
Yesterday, 4:37 PM
#35
I mean, most of it is more of an ecchi harem than anything like the girly romances... |
Anti-aliasing enthusiast |
Yesterday, 4:49 PM
#36
Reply to Briekimchi
@Lucifrost Couldn't you technically just go back to when all literature in the West was written exclusively for male consumption? Shakespeare? Greek tragedy? In response to OP's point, Shakespeare's male protagonists are nothing if not "sensitive young men" for the most part. 😂
Briekimchi said: Couldn't you technically just go back to when all literature in the West was written exclusively for male consumption? Shakespeare? Greek tragedy? In response to OP's point, Shakespeare's male protagonists are nothing if not "sensitive young men" for the most part. 😂 OK, so literally what I wrote in my first two paragraphs? |
Yesterday, 4:59 PM
#37
Reply to rohan121
@traed
I remember my mom amd some coworkers really liked hallmark while every guy in my family thought it was watching paint dry. It is funny noticing the common patterns in those movies, and it reminded me of this vid.
I remember my mom amd some coworkers really liked hallmark while every guy in my family thought it was watching paint dry. It is funny noticing the common patterns in those movies, and it reminded me of this vid.
@rohan121 The only think I know about Hallmark movies is this post: |
Yesterday, 5:55 PM
#38
Reply to thewiru
Briekimchi said:
Couldn't you technically just go back to when all literature in the West was written exclusively for male consumption? Shakespeare? Greek tragedy? In response to OP's point, Shakespeare's male protagonists are nothing if not "sensitive young men" for the most part. 😂
Couldn't you technically just go back to when all literature in the West was written exclusively for male consumption? Shakespeare? Greek tragedy? In response to OP's point, Shakespeare's male protagonists are nothing if not "sensitive young men" for the most part. 😂
OK, so literally what I wrote in my first two paragraphs?
@thewiru I know. I'm actually agreeing with you. I think the sadder aspect of this is that most Western audiences aren't remotely familiar with the wide range of literary content at their disposal, particularly classics, and something as fundamentally foundational as romantic stories intended for male sensibilities might actually be somewhat unfamiliar to the modern audience, who primarily consume whatever Netflix churns out. |
Yesterday, 7:10 PM
#39
rohan121 said: I remember my mom amd some coworkers really liked hallmark while every guy in my family thought it was watching paint dry. It is funny noticing the common patterns in those movies, and it reminded me of this vid. My mom loves them. Maybe since they are like old TV shows where it is just feel good light hearted a lot of the time but they are very poorly written and not the best actors often they are more not experienced or if they are experienced it is doing one off character work, sometimes indie films and porn. I feel like they overplayed the parody acting aspect there since it would have been funnier if more sincere in acting but just making the cookie cutter plots clear. |
⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣸⠋⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⡔⠀⢀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⡘⡰⠁⠘⡀⠀⠀⢠⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠁⠀⣀⠀⠀⡇⠀⡜⠈⠁⠀⢸⡈⢇⠀⠀⢣⠑⠢⢄⣇⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⢸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢰⡟⡀⠀⡇⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠘⡇⠈⢆⢰⠁⠀⠀⠀⠘⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠤⢄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡼⠀⣧⠀⢿⢠⣤⣤⣬⣥⠀⠁⠀⠀⠛⢀⡒⠀⠀⠀⠘⡆⡆⠀⠀⠀⡇⠀⠀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⢵⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡰⠀⢠⠃⠱⣼⡀⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠛⠳⠶⠶⠆⡸⢀⡀⣀⢰⠀⠀⢸ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⣀⣀⣀⠄⠀⠉⠁⠀⠀⢠⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⣼⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠴⠢⢄⡔⣕⡍⠣⣱⢸⠀⠀⢷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡰⠃⢀⠎⠀⠀⡜⡨⢢⡀⠀⠀⠀⠐⣄⠀⠀⣠⠀⠀⠀⠐⢛⠽⠗⠁⠀⠁⠊⠀⡜⠸⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⢀⠔⣁⡴⠃⠀⡠⡪⠊⣠⣾⣟⣷⡦⠤⣀⡈⠁⠉⢀⣀⡠⢔⠊⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⡤⡗⢀⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⢀⣠⠴⢑⡨⠊⡀⠤⠚⢉⣴⣾⣿⡿⣾⣿⡇⠀⠹⣻⠛⠉⠉⢀⠠⠺⠀⠀⡀⢄⣴⣾⣧⣞⠀⡜⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠐⠒⣉⠠⠄⡂⠅⠊⠁⠀⠀⣴⣿⣿⣿⣿⣻⣿⣿⡇⠀⠀⢠⣷⣮⡍⡠⠔⢉⡇⡠⠋⠁⠀⣿⣿⣿⣿⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ |
9 hours ago
#40
Reply to giantpudding
@thewiru Gooners. People so addicted to porn they mistake it for romance.
@giantpudding Just say that you read if for the plot, it's a bullet proof excuse. |
Anti-aliasing enthusiast |
9 hours ago
#41
krautnelson said: can you be more specific? what "narrative structure" makes a romance shounen or shoujo? There are a few indicators. And let's keep this to only shoujo and shounen to make it less complicated. If there are more bishounen than bishoujo, it is likely shoujo. If it is the other way around it is most likely shounen. Similarly, if the female protagonist has to choose among more than one male love interest the point goes to shoujo and to shounen if it is reversed. (Whoever has more love interests gets the point.) If the protagonist is female, that's a point for shoujo. If the protagonist is male, a point for shounen. If the female lead has basically no personality and is thus easy to self-insert it's a point for shoujo. If the male lead is like that it's a point for shounen. If the female protagonist has a at least one female friend, but the male love interest is alone, that's a point for shoujo. If it's the other way around a point for shounen. (Whoever has the larger social circle gets the point, including relatives, if they actually interact.) ...and so on.. But that's only structure. Karin (2005) has a bunch of points for shoujo in its structure, but still ends up being a shounen romance due to style and tropes. Also because Karin is a bishoujo, but her love interest is not a bishounen. That alone is pretty huge. If you can't tell what makes a character a bishoujo/bishounen, the easiest way to gauge it is to look how much the fandom drew porn of that character for bishoujo and wrote fanfics or BL about the character for bishounen. If you are wondering about style, here's an example: |
4 hours ago
#42
Reply to TransferUser
krautnelson said:
can you be more specific? what "narrative structure" makes a romance shounen or shoujo?
can you be more specific? what "narrative structure" makes a romance shounen or shoujo?
There are a few indicators. And let's keep this to only shoujo and shounen to make it less complicated.
If there are more bishounen than bishoujo, it is likely shoujo. If it is the other way around it is most likely shounen.
Similarly, if the female protagonist has to choose among more than one male love interest the point goes to shoujo and to shounen if it is reversed. (Whoever has more love interests gets the point.)
If the protagonist is female, that's a point for shoujo. If the protagonist is male, a point for shounen.
If the female lead has basically no personality and is thus easy to self-insert it's a point for shoujo. If the male lead is like that it's a point for shounen.
If the female protagonist has a at least one female friend, but the male love interest is alone, that's a point for shoujo. If it's the other way around a point for shounen. (Whoever has the larger social circle gets the point, including relatives, if they actually interact.)
...and so on..
But that's only structure. Karin (2005) has a bunch of points for shoujo in its structure, but still ends up being a shounen romance due to style and tropes. Also because Karin is a bishoujo, but her love interest is not a bishounen. That alone is pretty huge. If you can't tell what makes a character a bishoujo/bishounen, the easiest way to gauge it is to look how much the fandom drew porn of that character for bishoujo and wrote fanfics or BL about the character for bishounen.
If you are wondering about style, here's an example:
@TransferUser One thing that's not just a gender swap issue is that shoujo will write men way more emotionally expressive than shounen, emotional turmoil is just not that big of a thing for real men, as if is for shoujo love interest fictional men. |
Anti-aliasing enthusiast |
4 hours ago
#43
Reply to JaniSIr
@TransferUser One thing that's not just a gender swap issue is that shoujo will write men way more emotionally expressive than shounen, emotional turmoil is just not that big of a thing for real men, as if is for shoujo love interest fictional men.
@JaniSIr That's true. On the other side shounen romance will have the female love interest be dependent on the male protagonist in some way. For example, in Karin the female protagonist is a reverse vampire and needs the male love interest to bite and inject her blood regularly. |
4 hours ago
#44
Reply to JaniSIr
@giantpudding Just say that you read if for the plot, it's a bullet proof excuse.
@JaniSIr Just had someone tell me this is historically accurate: Guys this is ridiculous. |
3 hours ago
#45
Reply to giantpudding
@giantpudding It's generally historically accurate on the non-fantasy elements. Like you have pretty realistic armor, and proper fighting techniques. The whole witch nonsense is of course made up, but that's kind of obvious. Although why did you say this to me, I don't get how it relates to my "watch it for plot" comment. |
Anti-aliasing enthusiast |
2 hours ago
#46
JaniSIr said: @giantpudding It's generally historically accurate on the non-fantasy elements. Like you have pretty realistic armor, and proper fighting techniques. The whole witch nonsense is of course made up, but that's kind of obvious. Yes yes, you can basically throw the whole historically accurate argument out the window when you add the fetish porn in JaniSIr said: Although why did you say this to me, I don't get how it relates to my "watch it for plot" comment. It's the same underlying argument |
2 hours ago
#47
How do you explain romance for a male audience? You tell them, "This is romance aimed for a male audience". Why complicate it? |
2 hours ago
#48
Reply to giantpudding
JaniSIr said:
@giantpudding It's generally historically accurate on the non-fantasy elements.
Like you have pretty realistic armor, and proper fighting techniques.
The whole witch nonsense is of course made up, but that's kind of obvious.
@giantpudding It's generally historically accurate on the non-fantasy elements.
Like you have pretty realistic armor, and proper fighting techniques.
The whole witch nonsense is of course made up, but that's kind of obvious.
Yes yes, you can basically throw the whole historically accurate argument out the window when you add the fetish porn in
JaniSIr said:
Although why did you say this to me, I don't get how it relates to my "watch it for plot" comment.
Although why did you say this to me, I don't get how it relates to my "watch it for plot" comment.
It's the same underlying argument
@giantpudding The whole point of that show is that the author mixed historical events with magic bullshit, whereas Vinland Saga is more down to Earth in the sense that it didn't include literally magic, but it's clear that the first author did his homework about medieval Europe. Also that comment was supposed to be a half joke... |
Anti-aliasing enthusiast |
2 hours ago
#49
Reply to TransferUser
@JaniSIr That's true. On the other side shounen romance will have the female love interest be dependent on the male protagonist in some way. For example, in Karin the female protagonist is a reverse vampire and needs the male love interest to bite and inject her blood regularly.
@TransferUser I don't think that's specifically a target demographic issue, it's more of a gender role thing. |
Anti-aliasing enthusiast |
2 hours ago
#50
Reply to JaniSIr
@giantpudding The whole point of that show is that the author mixed historical events with magic bullshit, whereas Vinland Saga is more down to Earth in the sense that it didn't include literally magic, but it's clear that the first author did his homework about medieval Europe.
Also that comment was supposed to be a half joke...
Also that comment was supposed to be a half joke...
@JaniSIr Nah, the whole point is that the author got to insert his fetishes into the show JaniSIr said: Also that comment was supposed to be a half joke... Yes i know |
More topics from this board
» Tell a lie.. ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Ciezul - Jun 25 |
417 |
by Sheol01
»»
46 seconds ago |
|
» Why do many iconic Japanese media never or almost never have anime?RobertBobert - Aug 30 |
37 |
by jacobPOL
»»
3 minutes ago |
|
» 🎖️Ending of all time & discussion ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )nirererin - Jul 28 |
830 |
by -YaoiBoy-
»»
16 minutes ago |
|
» The Texas Anime Ban goes into effect September 1ForgotEyeWasHere - Yesterday |
28 |
by Rissenicus
»»
18 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » ecchi or hentai which dominate your anime list?deg - Yesterday |
18 |
by rbp_pbr2
»»
28 minutes ago |