Why do you have weird hentai fetishes

Pullman said:
I don't get it either, why can't people just enjoy loli hentai like any normal person would.

Pullman said:
I don't get it either, why can't people just enjoy loli hentai like any normal person would.

VladimirNabokov said:



Because not everyone can have a refined taste in porn :>

Hokage_Jason said:


I don’t watch hentai in general, but Lolis is a far worse fetish than tentacles.

It’s not okay getting off to little kids.

Hokage_Jason said:


I don’t watch hentai in general, but Lolis is a far worse fetish than tentacles.

It’s not okay getting off to little kids.

Manyaa_- said:


It's totally fine getting off to 2d kids. I mean, who the fuck am I hurting? Absolutely no one. I can fap to loli hentai and doujins with zero guilt.

Also I hate 3d kids. They're annoying.

Deathko said:
@Mila91 Make a hentai alt like most people here, problem solved

Hokage_Jason said:


I beg you to go say that in public, prerably around adult males who have daughters, and see what happens to you ; )

Manyaa_- said:


Just give me a really good reason WHY I should expose my kinks to random people with daughters? Just why? Even my close friends don't know about my kinks. And they have no reason to.

You just said something rarted.

thevagus said:

bruh, MAL isn't the best site to fight against loli lovers

Hokage_Jason said:


No you just don’t want to acknowledge the point. Getting off to kids is wrong, it’s a fetish that would get you beaten irl, for good reason. Even among criminals people attracted to kids are the lowest of the low, child molestors have been beaten to death in prison by fellow inmates.

cevat24 said:

They make those kind of hentai so that irl people don't hurt real kids. It's okay for a pedo to fap to lolis as long as it keeps him away from real girls.

Capitalism_Hater said:


those pictures... mmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Hokage_Jason said:


I mean... I’d agree it’s better but I don’t agree it’s okay. Feeding an interest could potentially lead to a stronger desire in that interest.

Someone who gets off to loli hentai could eventually get tired of it and crave the real thing.

The issue lies in the mindset of being attracted to children.

MrZawa said:


And that's where you are wrong. This isn't a question that can be approached with feelings, because they lead to wrong assumptions to be made due to attempt to protect, which in fact does the opposite. If we look at it logically:

First nothing would indicate that to be the case, and second, even common sense will tell you that person is much more likely to act on some desire if there is no acceptable outlet to alleviate it than if there is one. And since said attraction always did exist, as far as we can tell, some people will always have it, regardless if they read/watch loli hentai or not. But it offers victim-less way to satisfy such desires, and one that's also legal in some countries.
Which brings me to another point, if one were to make a decision to choose between lolicon hentai, a victim-less way, and real child porn that has victims, assuming that law and society considers them the same, but latter is much more realistic, and therefore, let's say it plainly, more arousing choice, it's obvious choice to go for the latter, if we disregard the morals of person in question. Common sense says that's definitely not okay, since it in a way condones abuse. So it's in fact in well-being of children themselves for lolicon hentai to exist. Therefore lolicon stuff being legal, and socially acceptable enough has chance to decrease market for the real thing, as well as making such desires easier to control, and decrease the amount of actual victims. Therefore your narrative is both false and indirectly dangerous.

Another point is that many lolis are so ambiguous in proportions that even people that have no interest in real kinds, but let's say prefer tiny girls, can still easily get attracted to them. In fact most lolicons fall into this category, including me, only fraction have attraction also toward real kids. It's also proven scientific fact that most men do get attracted to females that just reached puberty, due to them having greatest fertility, and due to those ambiguous proportions most men would find some lolis attractive.

Some people of course have more attraction than others, but either way I fail to see how said attraction in itself is wrong, it's not something that people can affected. It either exist or it doesn't. I'm sure many people with such attraction would quite willingly choose to abandon it if it was possible. Shaming and making them out to be enemies only makes matters worse. Only actions that one takes upon it can be right or wrong, and I find people tend to have huge issue seeing this point. And again, when it comes to actions, lolicon hentai certainly has much more potential to prevent people with such attractions taking the wrong actions than to encourage them.

Milk_is_Special said:
Ecchi is not the same as hentai. Otherwise things like American Pie should be classified as porn as well, and that doesn't happen either, or does it?

Hokage_Jason said:


1. No lolicon hentai is not being made to “protect children” that’s freaking absurd, it’s made because it generates profit and because there’s people who are into it, simple as that.

2. In some cases sure it could alleviate a persons desires, but if you say it’s impossible for it to increase their desires you don’t understand psychology enough to be having this discussion. That is literally half the cycle of addiction, you pick up some habit, fetish, interest, drug, whatever it may be, and over time the relief provided may diminish, causing people to seek alternate methods.

It’s not even arguable, it’s a fact.

Capitalism_Hater said:


I know the difference between ecchi and hentai. I just said I liked the pictures LoL

MrZawa said:


1. I never claimed that to be the case, it's obvious there are economic reasons, which just proves that there is enough people with interest in it, and some of them also have more real interests that might be, and likely are in more cases than not, kept in check due to it. It's indirect result of it, I never claimed otherwise, but it does exist that much must be admitted and showed to people because they label these things as dangerous way too fast without thinking it through.

2. I would say that, although in some cases it could happen, those people would need to have serious self-control issues to begin with, in which case they would likely do it anyway, maybe a bit later, but they would. People with normal self-control will be more likely than not positively affected. It's same argument as with video games causing more violent crimes, etc., which has been proven wrong every time.

Hokage_Jason said:


Alrighty we agree for the most part then.

I even agree it’s a mindset that can’t be helped, it’s not like people can chose what their brain/body reacts to, and it’s not like I’m saying people should die or be shamed for simply having that attraction.

But where we probably disagree is I think it’s wrong for people to openly talk about or indulge their interest in lolis and try defending it. “It’s not real so it doesn’t make me interested in children” is flawed logic, we all know it’s onviously prepubescent girl being depicted, and that’s what you’re in to.

A straight dude isn’t gonna to jerk it to male x male hentai and say “dude I’m not jerking it to guys they’re just animated I’m straight”

MrZawa said:


First, there are many types of lolis. Some of them may be in their early teens, and as I said, most people have interest in that, even if many may not be willing to admit it. Some of them may be even centuries old, since it's 2D, everything is possible. Therefore their age has no consequence on the arousal, because it's just a number on the paper. It's mostly about body proportions, and those are in many case ambiguous enough that the loli in question could be 10 or also 14. And they all look the same. Is it okay to get aroused by 800 years old loli and not by 10 year old loli that looks the same? If age is only factor, that would be the result, and that's just silly.

Also I do not see how defending something that one likes, and it causes no harm to anyone, should be wrong. Things that cause harm should be wrong, everything else should be everyone's personal matter. Also it is true that many people may like lolis, and might not like real kids. I believe I explained reasons for that enough. 2D heavily inaccurate depiction of child =/= real child by far.

Hokage_Jason said:


Well loli is a slang term so it leaves a bit of room for subjectivity, but 9/10 definitions of it you read are “a very young child, usually prepubescent” so I don’t consider someone 14+ to be a loli (not saying 14 is an acceptable age to be sexualizing either), and I especially don’t consider adults who look young (Taiga from Toradora) to be a loli. At least as far as my usage of the word goes.

That’s all I have to say though, like I said we aren’t going to agree on if it’s right or wrong lol.

crosswrm said:
If you want a boring answer is because of little mutations that happen on our brains when it's been developing that connects sexual desires with things that are not supposed to be sexual, like a part of our brain that recognizes hands and foots and heads are too close to the part of sexual desire and sometimes the part of it that recognizes foot gets attached to the part of sexual desire and voila, here's your foot fetish completed!

CallMeHoot said:


Russian guy, I forget the name, his book was called Lolita. Basically about a guy obsessing over a 12 year old girl and his "codename" for her in his journals and what not was "Lolita".

I see your posts a fair bit and I don't always agree with you, but on this one I think you're spot on (I'm talking about all your posts on this thread). No matter how you cut it, getting off to kids is flat out wrong and completely morally reprehensible. There's no defending this.

The argument I've seen others making in the thread that "it's just a cartoon" or "the age is ambiguous" are complete paper arguments. Escalation is common for pretty much any fetish. I mean, I'm a kinkster myself and it wasn't like I met my first girlfriend at a fetish dungeon, although I did meet my last girlfriend at one, because I sought out more of what I was into as time went on. For something fairly innocuous like garden variety kinks it's no big deal because you're dealing with other consenting adults who are aware enough to know what the score is but if you're bringing minors into it, man, it feels fucked up to even be commenting on this shit.

This is all going by the hardline definition of "lolita", i.e. prepubescent girl, and one portrayed as such. There's a massive difference between say, a sexually aware 15 year old (and even so, this is a fairly large legal/moral gray area) and a completely naive 12 year old.

CallMeHoot said:


That's so far off the mark that I can't even begin to correct you, man.

Hokage_Jason said:


Shit fam now I’m curious what I’ve posted that you disagree with XD not because I wanna arguebit with you but I’m just curious, maybe I did something out of line and didn’t realize it and if so would like to be made aware of it.

Usually the only things I post are my opinions which I acknowledge are just that, only my opinion, and I don’t try presenting them as fact.

The only thing I can recollect was shortly after I joined I got into a pretty heated arguement with two dudes over elfen lied, and regrettably I acted a bit immature, but that’s because they tried telling me I was an idiot who didn’t get it XD