New
Jan 4, 2015 12:11 PM
#151
I don't feel the need to justify it. It is what it is. |
Jan 4, 2015 12:13 PM
#152
You guys can like just ignore anime you know you hate... lmfao is it that hard? |
Jan 4, 2015 12:14 PM
#153
NicoHolmes said: You guys can like just ignore anime you know you hate... lmfao is it that hard? People love to hate a show that they don't like. |
Jan 4, 2015 12:14 PM
#154
Jan 4, 2015 12:20 PM
#155
NicoHolmes said: deep stories? Laugh out loud. Let's be real, it's all about the grim edge gore & violence. If you like character driven storytelling involving cute girls, you're a sad pedo virgin faggot (huh?). But if you like watching some crazy guy in black blow people's heads up and slice up their organs while laughing & screaming edgily, you're so sophisticates and like "deep plot."you like cute girls? burn in hell you like deep stories cool you deserve a fucking PHD |
Jan 4, 2015 12:20 PM
#156
Lyuze said: 1564 said: Journey_95 said: Fierce_Deity22 said: sullynathan said: What gives animu an even worse name is when loli fans try to defend liking lolis You my friend are right on the money. It's disqusting seeing these people defend lolis :/ I'm with you and it's shocking how many People like this sick stuff What is wrong with liking cute things? People don't seem ashamed liking cats and there are plenty pics of them getting on reddit's front page. Why is liking cats for their cuteness alright but liking lolis for their cuteness sick? Liking cute things and wanting to put your dick into cute things are two completely different concepts. If you like the cute little girls for being cute, that's fine and dandy; there's absolutely nothing wrong with liking cute things. Liking the little girl because you want to have sex with it is not okay. Lolisi come from the Moe boom. Lolis are moe, thus lolis are included on a large scale. Most fans of lolis don't want to stick their dicks in them, they want to adopt them and be overly parenting to them. It is essentially no different than rabbits or bunnies. |
Jan 4, 2015 12:31 PM
#157
Jan 4, 2015 12:35 PM
#158
PeripheralVision said: Lyuze said: 1564 said: Journey_95 said: Fierce_Deity22 said: sullynathan said: What gives animu an even worse name is when loli fans try to defend liking lolis You my friend are right on the money. It's disqusting seeing these people defend lolis :/ I'm with you and it's shocking how many People like this sick stuff What is wrong with liking cute things? People don't seem ashamed liking cats and there are plenty pics of them getting on reddit's front page. Why is liking cats for their cuteness alright but liking lolis for their cuteness sick? Liking cute things and wanting to put your dick into cute things are two completely different concepts. If you like the cute little girls for being cute, that's fine and dandy; there's absolutely nothing wrong with liking cute things. Liking the little girl because you want to have sex with it is not okay. Lolisi come from the Moe boom. Lolis are moe, thus lolis are included on a large scale. Most fans of lolis don't want to stick their dicks in them, they want to adopt them and be overly parenting to them. It is essentially no different than rabbits or bunnies. But that's just outright horseshit. The word "loli" is taken from "lolicon" which, according to Wikipedia, is Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls. When discussing "loli" you're discussing sexualized young girls in Japanese media. The very word "lolicon" is coined from the novel "Lolita" which is about a middle aged man who wants to bone his 12 year old step-daughter. I don't refer to Rin in Usagi Drop as a "loli" because she's not sexualized, despite being a 6 year old girl. I would however refer to Rin from Kodomo no Jikan as a loli, because her entire existance based on pandering to "lolicon." When you're discussing "loli" you're not referring to all young girls in general, you're referring to the ones who are sexualized. |
Jan 4, 2015 12:46 PM
#159
Lyuze said: PeripheralVision said: Lyuze said: 1564 said: Journey_95 said: Fierce_Deity22 said: sullynathan said: What gives animu an even worse name is when loli fans try to defend liking lolis You my friend are right on the money. It's disqusting seeing these people defend lolis :/ I'm with you and it's shocking how many People like this sick stuff What is wrong with liking cute things? People don't seem ashamed liking cats and there are plenty pics of them getting on reddit's front page. Why is liking cats for their cuteness alright but liking lolis for their cuteness sick? Liking cute things and wanting to put your dick into cute things are two completely different concepts. If you like the cute little girls for being cute, that's fine and dandy; there's absolutely nothing wrong with liking cute things. Liking the little girl because you want to have sex with it is not okay. Lolisi come from the Moe boom. Lolis are moe, thus lolis are included on a large scale. Most fans of lolis don't want to stick their dicks in them, they want to adopt them and be overly parenting to them. It is essentially no different than rabbits or bunnies. But that's just outright horseshit. The word "loli" is taken from "lolicon" which, according to Wikipedia, is Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls. When discussing "loli" you're discussing sexualized young girls in Japanese media. The very word "lolicon" is coined from the novel "Lolita" which is about a middle aged man who wants to bone his 12 year old step-daughter. I don't refer to Rin in Usagi Drop as a "loli" because she's not sexualized, despite being a 6 year old girl. I would however refer to Rin from Kodomo no Jikan as a loli, because her entire existance based on pandering to "lolicon." When you're discussing "loli" you're not referring to all young girls in general, you're referring to the ones who are sexualized. It's been common practice to include young girls in a work to appeal to moe lovers. We wouldn't even have most lolis or young girls in general if they weren't pandering to the moe fanbase. |
Jan 4, 2015 12:50 PM
#160
Jan 4, 2015 12:50 PM
#161
Lyuze said: PeripheralVision said: Lyuze said: 1564 said: Journey_95 said: Fierce_Deity22 said: sullynathan said: What gives animu an even worse name is when loli fans try to defend liking lolis You my friend are right on the money. It's disqusting seeing these people defend lolis :/ I'm with you and it's shocking how many People like this sick stuff What is wrong with liking cute things? People don't seem ashamed liking cats and there are plenty pics of them getting on reddit's front page. Why is liking cats for their cuteness alright but liking lolis for their cuteness sick? Liking cute things and wanting to put your dick into cute things are two completely different concepts. If you like the cute little girls for being cute, that's fine and dandy; there's absolutely nothing wrong with liking cute things. Liking the little girl because you want to have sex with it is not okay. Lolisi come from the Moe boom. Lolis are moe, thus lolis are included on a large scale. Most fans of lolis don't want to stick their dicks in them, they want to adopt them and be overly parenting to them. It is essentially no different than rabbits or bunnies. But that's just outright horseshit. The word "loli" is taken from "lolicon" which, according to Wikipedia, is Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls. When discussing "loli" you're discussing sexualized young girls in Japanese media. The very word "lolicon" is coined from the novel "Lolita" which is about a middle aged man who wants to bone his 12 year old step-daughter. I don't refer to Rin in Usagi Drop as a "loli" because she's not sexualized, despite being a 6 year old girl. I would however refer to Rin from Kodomo no Jikan as a loli, because her entire existance based on pandering to "lolicon." When you're discussing "loli" you're not referring to all young girls in general, you're referring to the ones who are sexualized. It still stems from the Moe Boom. It's been common tactic to include young girls in work to pander to this moe fanbase. http://www.newyorker.com/culture/culture-desk/pharrell-williamss-lolicon-girl "Still, the headlines sent lolicon underground for many years, and in the nineteen-nineties creators reared on the genre absorbed, defanged, and desexualized it for the mainstream. Today, it has morphed into an animation style called moé, after a kanji character meaning both “burning” and “bursting into bud.” In moé, sexuality is treated indirectly; rather than showing overtly pornographic images, it focusses on “slice of life” dramas that allow consumers—mainly adult men—to observe the budding sexuality of pre-teen and teen-age girls from a discreet remove." |
Jan 4, 2015 1:18 PM
#162
KazuyaKujo said: another thing that gives anime a bad rep is people who don't watch it and are quick to judge people "why would a teenager spend all their time at home watching shows?" is just an absurd question It's not really so absurd a question. As much as I really, really, really love anime; it's completely ridiculous to dedicate all of your free time to Asian cartoons to the detriment of your real life relationships and experiences. I'm not saying that spending a large chunk of your time dedicated to anime is bad, but it's terrible that there are people who do nothing but watch anime and are incapable of seeing any problem with that. |
Jan 4, 2015 2:39 PM
#164
Loli is a body type too. Konata is commonly called a loli despite being 17. |
Jan 4, 2015 2:50 PM
#166
What doesn't give anime a bad reputation? Cynics will use any excuse to hate on anime. In fact, I'm willing to bet true cynics don't even know about loli/shotacon (or at least, not what it actually means), or even about incestuous undertones. The most comments I've heard say that it's either too violent, too childish, or that it has too much sex in it. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Jan 4, 2015 11:30 PM
#167
Lyuze said: I sense a hint of "loli is only for little girls whose treatment I disapprove of" here. Let's compare the two mangas: I don't refer to Rin in Usagi Drop as a "loli" because she's not sexualized, despite being a 6 year old girl. I would however refer to Rin from Kodomo no Jikan as a loli, because her entire existance based on pandering to "lolicon." In Usagi Drop, Rin eventually becomes a sexual and romantic interest for Daikichi, once she's of age. In Kodomo no Jikan, Rin eventually becomes a sexual and romantic interest for Daisuke, once she's of age. Not so different, now are they? |
Jan 4, 2015 11:36 PM
#168
only if people keep talking about it |
Jan 4, 2015 11:49 PM
#169
Jan 4, 2015 11:58 PM
#170
Fierce_Deity22 said: YES they give anime a horrible reputation they need to go away ASAP. Its already hard enough to get people into anime. Trying to find person number 16. Those things is the definition of trash. Do you know nothing of profit or managing an industry? Taking out key fetishes will lose the company money and anyway, who cares if its hard getting people into anime? |
Jan 5, 2015 12:05 AM
#171
I didn't even know of the existence of 'Things like lolicon/shotacon and incest' within anime until I actually got into the fandom. Not many people outside of the fandom really know much about that stuff. What gave me a bad impression of anime fans was their weird obsession with kid centric action shows and dumb gorefests. |
Jan 5, 2015 12:52 AM
#172
The problem isn't exactly in it's existence. Ignorant people will dismiss it anyway with ''Stop watching caartoons, they're for kids''. Also anime always had fanservice. However I do think there is a problem that anime of today has too much fanservice. Not only that, it's completely unnatural and wierd. For example it's not a shower scene, which appears once in 20 episodes, but the characters are talking while the camera angle shows the girls ass (Sinon in SAO2). It's in most modern anime and in a lot of episodes. Or special episodes dedicated solely to fanservice, in a non-fanservice show. Just look at what's coming out nowadays. Shitty LN adaptations, with 1 guy getting chased by girls for being socially awkward, while cramming in tons of panty and boob shots. If you were to sit someone who never watched anime and show him a current airing season, he would probably think it's for perverts, or for socially awkward people. What I'm trying to say is, that most modern anime has too much fanservice, too much focus on awkward sexual situations, not enough focus on characters and too much loli/echhi with little girls with annoying voices. Let's face it. Most people who watch this aren't watching it for the plot or because ''it's cute'' but because they like fapping to it. This isn't some hidden corner of anime, but the mainstream nowadays. Just look at how many people like Mahouka. (And just btw incest is not ''wincest'', thanks for ruining the image of anime further). The way things are going it's harder and harder to get a ''normal'' non-anime person to watch anime. At the same times it seems to attract more kids, immature manchildren and downright perverts than ever. |
SaandroJan 5, 2015 12:59 AM
Jan 5, 2015 2:30 AM
#173
I think lolicon/shotacon is a fetish to other people, so it doesn't directly give anime bad rep, but for the incest, incest is a taboo to most countries but who cares if we legalise incest it doesn't give bad rep. Well to conclude all subjects give bad or good reputation according to perspectives and traditions. |
Nami is the best anime ever |
Jan 5, 2015 2:34 AM
#174
I don't care for people who thinks lolicon is bad. I dislike most conservative moral crusaders anyway. Stop caring about lolicon and how it paints you for liking anime in other people's eyes. People who think anime is all lolicon are generally ignorant and not worthy of your attention. Leave lolicons alone, people will like what they like. No harm. A therapist told me unless it causes trouble in your daily functioning, you don't need to see a therapist for it. So who cares if someone wants to bang a virtual 12 year old? It's their life, and they're causing harm to no one. Really, we should only ban stuff that is known to cause harm in society, instead of going on a witch hunt. |
Jan 5, 2015 6:00 AM
#175
Journey_95 said: Anime is such a great medium I-is this guy serious? I... I don't even. Hoppy said: It's not the content but the obsessive fans that drag it down. Sounds about right. |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Jan 5, 2015 7:16 AM
#176
Late night anime or otaku anime is made by otaku for otaku audiences thriving on otaku money, if you don't like otaku pandering then you should stop watching otaku anime in the first place. You can stick with manga industry which is mostly mainstream culture. |
Jan 5, 2015 7:20 AM
#177
PeripheralVision said: I don't care for people who thinks lolicon is bad. I dislike most conservative moral crusaders anyway. Really, we should only ban stuff that is known to cause harm in society, instead of going on a witch hunt. But you care for people who think about fucking loli characters mmm okay :^/ |
Jan 5, 2015 7:26 AM
#178
Anime is shit and only lolicon can save it. |
Jan 5, 2015 7:30 AM
#179
Jan 5, 2015 7:33 AM
#180
That could be true. Being a lolicon is certainly looked down upon. Unfortunately, I am a lolicon and a shotacon, so I have a vested interested in it staying a part of anime culture. Edit: Lyuze said: Liking cute things and wanting to put your dick into cute things are two completely different concepts. If you like the cute little girls for being cute, that's fine and dandy; there's absolutely nothing wrong with liking cute things. Liking the little girl because you want to have sex with it is not okay. Can't adults be cute? To me, loli and shota are body types. It's uncommon for adults to have certain kinds of cuteness, but there are still adults who look that way. And this is going to become more common with technology exponentially increasing and more cosmetic surgeries appearing. Some people, like me, just aren't really attracted to secondary sex characteristics. And cuteness is sexy. But that doesn't mean we want to hurt anybody. My response to my sexuality and my gender identity, is to use future technology to become a loli myself. |
FairyTechnologyJan 5, 2015 7:55 AM
Jan 5, 2015 2:03 PM
#181
Oni_Link said: PeripheralVision said: I don't care for people who thinks lolicon is bad. I dislike most conservative moral crusaders anyway. Really, we should only ban stuff that is known to cause harm in society, instead of going on a witch hunt. But you care for people who think about fucking loli characters mmm okay :^/ And they cause harm by....wanting to bone virtual girls. Okay. I should care why? It's not like they want to bone a real one. Besides, even if a guy did want to bone my daughter, that's his business. There's no problem if he keeps it in his pants and leave my daughter alone. If he has the self control, than I will respect his decision to seek or not seek therapy. |
Jan 5, 2015 2:24 PM
#182
PeripheralVision said: Would you want your daughter near that man though? Or even alone with and supervising any child for that matter?Oni_Link said: PeripheralVision said: I don't care for people who thinks lolicon is bad. I dislike most conservative moral crusaders anyway. Really, we should only ban stuff that is known to cause harm in society, instead of going on a witch hunt. But you care for people who think about fucking loli characters mmm okay :^/ And they cause harm by....wanting to bone virtual girls. Okay. I should care why? It's not like they want to bone a real one. Besides, even if a guy did want to bone my daughter, that's his business. There's no problem if he keeps it in his pants and leave my daughter alone. If he has the self control, than I will respect his decision to seek or not seek therapy. |
Jan 5, 2015 2:29 PM
#183
FairyTechnology said: Yes , of course. Can't adults be cute? |
Jan 5, 2015 2:33 PM
#184
She does have a cute face. I'm guessing if she had a more androgynous body, people would call her a loli. |
Jan 5, 2015 2:36 PM
#185
FairyTechnology said: The only way she would be called a loli is if she looked like a little girl.She does have a cute face. I'm guessing if she had a more androgynous body, people would call her a loli. |
Jan 5, 2015 2:37 PM
#186
I get the feeling that people would think she looked like a little girl if she didn't have boobs. Though, to be honest, I have never heard of a single flat chested female anime character who wasn't called a loli. |
Jan 5, 2015 2:49 PM
#187
FairyTechnology said: I seriously doubt that considering her height. Characters like Mayumi , Riruka and Rukia are flat chested yet they are not seen as lolis. Lolis are little girls so that's why they tend to be flat chested.I get the feeling that people would think she looked like a little girl if she didn't have boobs. Though, to be honest, I have never heard of a single flat chested female anime character who wasn't called a loli. |
Jan 5, 2015 2:50 PM
#188
DrGeroCreation said: Characters like Mayumi , Riruka and Rukia are flat chested yet they are not seen as lolis. I suppose that depends on who you ask. Rukia is totally a loli to me. |
Jan 5, 2015 2:55 PM
#189
FairyTechnology said: You are the only person I have heard refer to her as a loli. Kenpachi's vice captain Yachiru is a loli not Rukia. Rukia is just short and petite.DrGeroCreation said: Characters like Mayumi , Riruka and Rukia are flat chested yet they are not seen as lolis. I suppose that depends on who you ask. Rukia is totally a loli to me. |
Jan 5, 2015 3:13 PM
#190
Well, that's interesting. I'm not the only person I have heard refer to Rukia as a loli. |
Jan 5, 2015 3:16 PM
#191
FairyTechnology said: Those people probably think every female character that is short is automatically a loli, which is obviously not true.Well, that's interesting. I'm not the only person I have heard refer to Rukia as a loli. |
Jan 5, 2015 3:19 PM
#192
The thing about words, is that they evolve. Loli or Lolita also describe a cute, girly, frilly, childlike fashion style. But it doesn't have anything to do with pedophilia or sexualizing children. The term moe has done the same thing, it's very broad in its meaning. They're umbrella terms. |
Jan 5, 2015 3:21 PM
#193
FairyTechnology said: So you are telling me that loli has evolved to mean any female anime character that is short? That is news to me.The thing about words, is that they evolve. Loli or Lolita also describe a cute, girly, frilly, childlike fashion style. But it doesn't have anything to do with pedophilia or sexualizing children. The term moe has done the same thing, it's very broad in its meaning. |
DrGeroCreationJan 5, 2015 3:24 PM
Jan 5, 2015 3:23 PM
#194
DrGeroCreation said: im with gero's_abomination on this that would be news to me as wellFairyTechnology said: So you are talling me that loli has evolved to mean any female anime character that is short? That is news to me.The thing about words, is that they evolve. Loli or Lolita also describe a cute, girly, frilly, childlike fashion style. But it doesn't have anything to do with pedophilia or sexualizing children. The term moe has done the same thing, it's very broad in its meaning. |
Jan 5, 2015 3:23 PM
#195
DrGeroCreation said: So you are talling me that loli has evolved to mean any female anime character that is short? That is news to me. Mmmm... moreso flat chested. But both certainly helps. The more childlike features she has, the more likely people are going to consider her a loli. Loli is pretty synonymous with DFC in the West right now, though. But a cute, childlike face, or being short will certainly add to that. Hips, too. They're similar to breasts. In that they're a secondary sex characteristic. A woman with androgynous hips is probably going to be seen as more loli. |
Jan 5, 2015 3:28 PM
#196
FairyTechnology said: Rukia has no childlike features at all, she is just short and petite. Lolis to me were always little girl characters not female characters that are short and flat chested.DrGeroCreation said: So you are talling me that loli has evolved to mean any female anime character that is short? That is news to me. Mmmm... moreso flat chested. But both certainly helps. The more childlike features she has, the more likely people are going to consider her a loli. Loli is pretty synonymous with DFC in the West right now, though. But a cute, childlike face, or being short will certainly add to that. Hips, too. They're similar to breasts. In that they're a secondary sex characteristic. A woman with androgynous hips is probably going to be seen as more loli. |
Jan 5, 2015 3:35 PM
#197
DrGeroCreation said: Rukia has no childlike features at all, she is just short and petite. Lolis to me were always little girl characters not female characters that are short and flat chested. Um, I don't know how to say this. But being short and flat chested are childlike features. It's possible for adult women to have childlike features like that. |
Jan 5, 2015 3:54 PM
#198
FairyTechnology said: DrGeroCreation said: Rukia has no childlike features at all, she is just short and petite. Lolis to me were always little girl characters not female characters that are short and flat chested. Um, I don't know how to say this. But being short and flat chested are childlike features. It's possible for adult women to have childlike features like that. Childlike =!= child For the sake of debate, words must be used by their literal definitions. If everybody argued with their own personal ideas of what words mean, discussion would be... Well... MAL threads. The literal definition of lolicon is "Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls." Now, there's a difference between liking lolicon and liking petite body types. It's lolicon as a concept that's sickening. The idea of having sex with a child is what disturbs other people. If the person just looks rather young but they're of age and perfectly capable of receiving vaginal penetration, then that's cool. But having sex with someone who is clearly not of age and clearly not prepared to take a dick is disgusting. Again, there's a large difference between liking petite bodies and liking children. |
Jan 5, 2015 3:59 PM
#199
Lyuze said: Childlike =!= child Loli =!= child Lyuze said: For the sake of debate, words must be used by their literal definitions. If everybody argued with their own personal ideas of what words mean, discussion would be... Well... MAL threads. The literal definition of lolicon is "Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls." There are no permanent "literal" definitions of words. All words evolve. Loli and Lolicon, even, are new terms, without a long history of standing, unaltered usage. If there were to be any words with a stable definition, loli and lolicon would not be among them. Words are defined by the people who use them. And a large portion of people who use the term, mean loli to mean nothing more than a body type. Lyuze said: Again, there's a large difference between liking petite bodies and liking children. That's true, but there isn't a large difference between liking petite bodies, and being a lolicon. |
Jan 5, 2015 4:08 PM
#200
FairyTechnology said: Lyuze said: Childlike =!= child Loli =!= child Lyuze said: For the sake of debate, words must be used by their literal definitions. If everybody argued with their own personal ideas of what words mean, discussion would be... Well... MAL threads. The literal definition of lolicon is "Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls." There are no permanent "literal" definitions of words. All words evolve. Loli and Lolicon, even, are new terms, without a long history of standing, unaltered usage. If there were to be any words with a stable definition, loli and lolicon would not be among them. Yes, there are literal definitions. We have dictionaries for a reason, it's why we can form cohesive sentences. When you're debating, you can't argue with your personal opinion of what a word means, you have to use their current definition whether you agree with it or not. I think "execution" means "getting bullied." How well do you think I'd do at a debate about capital punishment? Whether you like it or not, the current definitions of loli and lolicon are explicitly related to the sexualization of young/prepubescent girls. That definition may change in the future, none of us can predict that. But as of now, at this moment in time, during this discussion, in this MAL thread, the definition of lolicon is "Japanese discourse or media focusing on the attraction to young or prepubescent girls." |
More topics from this board
» What anime only exist inside other anime not real life?AnimeDownUnder - 1 hour ago |
9 |
by Tirinchas
»»
40 seconds ago |
|
» Is it bad to raw-dog seasonals? ( 1 2 )thewiru - Yesterday |
56 |
by Morphun
»»
3 minutes ago |
|
» Are we going through a Yuri Renaissance? ( 1 2 )Dragevard - Oct 12 |
60 |
by Aoi_hana
»»
7 minutes ago |
|
Sticky: » AWC 2025 Anime Watching Challenge - Sign-Up (Open Until December 10th) ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )AWC_mod - Jan 1 |
910 |
by BeanChagBear
»»
9 minutes ago |
|
» 🍷 AD Summer 2025 Best Girl Contest ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Shizuna - Sep 28 |
424 |
by tywhoppity
»»
10 minutes ago |