New
This topic has been locked and is no longer available for discussion.
Dec 15, 2015 8:51 AM
#601
Dec 15, 2015 8:54 AM
#602
OneTrueBaita said: kill each other plsCherryLover said: <br />OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: <br />OneTrueBaita said: <br />CherryLover said: <br />OneTrueBaita said: <br />CherryLover said: <br /><br /> But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon <br /> Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith <br /> Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. <br /> Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. <br /> No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. <br /> That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? <br /> Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. <br /> Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. <br /> No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. <br /> I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense?<br /> Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. <br /> No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword".<br /> <br /> Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<br /> <br /> Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. |
Dec 15, 2015 8:54 AM
#603
CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense? Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword". Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. Two can play the dictionary game, Baita. As according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a person skilled in fighting with a sword". Cambridge English Dictionary. (2015) Cambridge University Press. Accessed: December 15, 2015 And the definition of a person is simple. So Sebastian is a swordsman. Invalid submission. The Cambridge English Dictionary (4th ISBN 9781107619500) does not trump the Oxford English Dictionary (9th ISBN 0-19-479900-X). |
Dec 15, 2015 8:56 AM
#604
OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense? Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword". Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. Two can play the dictionary game, Baita. As according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a person skilled in fighting with a sword". Cambridge English Dictionary. (2015) Cambridge University Press. Accessed: December 15, 2015 And the definition of a person is simple. So Sebastian is a swordsman. Invalid submission. The Cambridge English Dictionary (4th ISBN 9781107619500) does not trump the Oxford English Dictionary (9th ISBN 0-19-479900-X). Invalid as well. No source for claim. The CED's usage is far more than that of Oxford's as according to a school survey. No source either, but since you aren't listing your sources, my argument is just as valid. |
Waiting patiently for springtime to return! n_n Join the Social Justice Club now! Everyone dedicated to spreading feminism on MAL is welcome to join! Link to my interview! |
Dec 15, 2015 9:00 AM
#605
I forgot this one Also the gal in my avy and sig, Youmu Konpaku. One of the fastest characters in Touhou, faster than Aya Shamemairu. These characters are OP fucks that go at the speed of light. Uses two swords, Hakurouken and Roukanken. The former can cut through anything, and the latter can "cut" wandering spirits in order for them to reach enlightenment. Is also probably thousands of years old, and is thus very skilled at using swords. |
Dec 15, 2015 9:02 AM
#606
CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense? Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword". Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. Two can play the dictionary game, Baita. As according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a person skilled in fighting with a sword". Cambridge English Dictionary. (2015) Cambridge University Press. Accessed: December 15, 2015 And the definition of a person is simple. So Sebastian is a swordsman. Invalid submission. The Cambridge English Dictionary (4th ISBN 9781107619500) does not trump the Oxford English Dictionary (9th ISBN 0-19-479900-X). Invalid as well. No source for claim. The CED's usage is far more than that of Oxford's as according to a school survey. No source either, but since you aren't listing your sources, my argument is just as valid. Au contraire. The Oxford English Dictionary is the authoritative historical dictionary of English, published in 1948 by Humphrey S. Milford. Reference: History of the OED (2015). [Online] OED. Available from: http://public.oed.com/history-of-the-oed/ [Accessed December 15, 2015]. With a history spanning over 60 years, this is the dictionary that should be use when clarifying the definitive definitions of a word or phrase. |
Dec 15, 2015 9:05 AM
#607
OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense? Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword". Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. Two can play the dictionary game, Baita. As according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a person skilled in fighting with a sword". Cambridge English Dictionary. (2015) Cambridge University Press. Accessed: December 15, 2015 And the definition of a person is simple. So Sebastian is a swordsman. Invalid submission. The Cambridge English Dictionary (4th ISBN 9781107619500) does not trump the Oxford English Dictionary (9th ISBN 0-19-479900-X). Invalid as well. No source for claim. The CED's usage is far more than that of Oxford's as according to a school survey. No source either, but since you aren't listing your sources, my argument is just as valid. Au contraire. The Oxford English Dictionary is the authoritative historical dictionary of English, published in 1948 by Humphrey S. Milford. Reference: History of the OED (2015). [Online] OED. Available from: http://public.oed.com/history-of-the-oed/ [Accessed December 15, 2015]. With a history spanning over 60 years, this is the dictionary that should be use when clarifying the definitive definitions of a word or phrase. Don't you try that. History has nothing to do with accuracy. The Cambridge University Press has been publishing dictionaries for learners of English since 1995, and are informed by the Cambridge English Corpus, billions of words of real English, and the Cambridge Learner Corpus, a unique collection of exam scripts written by students taking Cambridge ESOL exams all over the world. About Cambridge Dictionaries Online (2015). [Online] Camberidge Dictionaries Online. Available from: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/about.html [Accessed December 15, 2015]. |
Waiting patiently for springtime to return! n_n Join the Social Justice Club now! Everyone dedicated to spreading feminism on MAL is welcome to join! Link to my interview! |
Dec 15, 2015 9:08 AM
#608
CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense? Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword". Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. Two can play the dictionary game, Baita. As according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a person skilled in fighting with a sword". Cambridge English Dictionary. (2015) Cambridge University Press. Accessed: December 15, 2015 And the definition of a person is simple. So Sebastian is a swordsman. Invalid submission. The Cambridge English Dictionary (4th ISBN 9781107619500) does not trump the Oxford English Dictionary (9th ISBN 0-19-479900-X). Invalid as well. No source for claim. The CED's usage is far more than that of Oxford's as according to a school survey. No source either, but since you aren't listing your sources, my argument is just as valid. Au contraire. The Oxford English Dictionary is the authoritative historical dictionary of English, published in 1948 by Humphrey S. Milford. Reference: History of the OED (2015). [Online] OED. Available from: http://public.oed.com/history-of-the-oed/ [Accessed December 15, 2015]. With a history spanning over 60 years, this is the dictionary that should be use when clarifying the definitive definitions of a word or phrase. Don't you try that. History has nothing to do with accuracy. The Cambridge University Press has been publishing dictionaries for learners of English since 1995, and are informed by the Cambridge English Corpus, billions of words of real English, and the Cambridge Learner Corpus, a unique collection of exam scripts written by students taking Cambridge ESOL exams all over the world. About Cambridge Dictionaries Online (2015). [Online] Camberidge Dictionaries Online. Available from: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/about.html [Accessed December 15, 2015]. It has everything to do with it, and has nothing to do with examinations such as the ESOL. That would be claiming that examinations validate dictionaries when the other way round is what usually occurs. In reply to your claim that the Cambridge Dictionary has "billions of words", such a feat is easily attained by the OED, which renders your argument invalid. |
Dec 15, 2015 9:11 AM
#609
OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense? Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword". Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. Two can play the dictionary game, Baita. As according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a person skilled in fighting with a sword". Cambridge English Dictionary. (2015) Cambridge University Press. Accessed: December 15, 2015 And the definition of a person is simple. So Sebastian is a swordsman. Invalid submission. The Cambridge English Dictionary (4th ISBN 9781107619500) does not trump the Oxford English Dictionary (9th ISBN 0-19-479900-X). Invalid as well. No source for claim. The CED's usage is far more than that of Oxford's as according to a school survey. No source either, but since you aren't listing your sources, my argument is just as valid. Au contraire. The Oxford English Dictionary is the authoritative historical dictionary of English, published in 1948 by Humphrey S. Milford. Reference: History of the OED (2015). [Online] OED. Available from: http://public.oed.com/history-of-the-oed/ [Accessed December 15, 2015]. With a history spanning over 60 years, this is the dictionary that should be use when clarifying the definitive definitions of a word or phrase. Don't you try that. History has nothing to do with accuracy. The Cambridge University Press has been publishing dictionaries for learners of English since 1995, and are informed by the Cambridge English Corpus, billions of words of real English, and the Cambridge Learner Corpus, a unique collection of exam scripts written by students taking Cambridge ESOL exams all over the world. About Cambridge Dictionaries Online (2015). [Online] Camberidge Dictionaries Online. Available from: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/about.html [Accessed December 15, 2015]. It has everything to do with it, and has nothing to do with examinations such as the ESOL. That would be claiming that examinations validate dictionaries when the other way round is what usually occurs. In reply to your claim that the Cambridge Dictionary has "billions of words", such a feat is easily attained by the OED, which renders your argument invalid. Wrong, the ESOL exams have everything to do with it. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is an international standard for describing language ability. It is used around the world to describe learners’ language skills. The CEFR has six levels – from A1 for the most basic beginner to C2 for the very highest level of ability. The Cambridge examinations cater to every level, including the C2, which shows how trusted it is for high-tier examinations. The OED, however, does not boast such feats. |
Waiting patiently for springtime to return! n_n Join the Social Justice Club now! Everyone dedicated to spreading feminism on MAL is welcome to join! Link to my interview! |
Dec 15, 2015 9:14 AM
#610
CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense? Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword". Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. Two can play the dictionary game, Baita. As according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a person skilled in fighting with a sword". Cambridge English Dictionary. (2015) Cambridge University Press. Accessed: December 15, 2015 And the definition of a person is simple. So Sebastian is a swordsman. Invalid submission. The Cambridge English Dictionary (4th ISBN 9781107619500) does not trump the Oxford English Dictionary (9th ISBN 0-19-479900-X). Invalid as well. No source for claim. The CED's usage is far more than that of Oxford's as according to a school survey. No source either, but since you aren't listing your sources, my argument is just as valid. Au contraire. The Oxford English Dictionary is the authoritative historical dictionary of English, published in 1948 by Humphrey S. Milford. Reference: History of the OED (2015). [Online] OED. Available from: http://public.oed.com/history-of-the-oed/ [Accessed December 15, 2015]. With a history spanning over 60 years, this is the dictionary that should be use when clarifying the definitive definitions of a word or phrase. Don't you try that. History has nothing to do with accuracy. The Cambridge University Press has been publishing dictionaries for learners of English since 1995, and are informed by the Cambridge English Corpus, billions of words of real English, and the Cambridge Learner Corpus, a unique collection of exam scripts written by students taking Cambridge ESOL exams all over the world. About Cambridge Dictionaries Online (2015). [Online] Camberidge Dictionaries Online. Available from: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/about.html [Accessed December 15, 2015]. It has everything to do with it, and has nothing to do with examinations such as the ESOL. That would be claiming that examinations validate dictionaries when the other way round is what usually occurs. In reply to your claim that the Cambridge Dictionary has "billions of words", such a feat is easily attained by the OED, which renders your argument invalid. Wrong, the ESOL exams have everything to do with it. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is an international standard for describing language ability. It is used around the world to describe learners’ language skills. The CEFR has six levels – from A1 for the most basic beginner to C2 for the very highest level of ability. The Cambridge examinations cater to every level, including the C2, which shows how trusted it is for high-tier examinations. The OED, however, does not boast such feats. Please do your research before stating a fact. The OED is the go-to dictionary for exams all over the world. Internationally recognised English proficiency exams such as TOEFL and IELTS use it as the source of empirical definitions for words they use in their respective examinations. In addition, the A-levels have had a history of featuring OED-based questions. The AQA examination paper for A level English Language in January 2004 contained a question based on OED entries. Students were asked to comment on the entries giraffe and hippopotamus as part of a section of the course entitled ‘Language Change’. |
Dec 15, 2015 9:16 AM
#611
OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense? Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword". Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. Two can play the dictionary game, Baita. As according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a person skilled in fighting with a sword". Cambridge English Dictionary. (2015) Cambridge University Press. Accessed: December 15, 2015 And the definition of a person is simple. So Sebastian is a swordsman. Invalid submission. The Cambridge English Dictionary (4th ISBN 9781107619500) does not trump the Oxford English Dictionary (9th ISBN 0-19-479900-X). Invalid as well. No source for claim. The CED's usage is far more than that of Oxford's as according to a school survey. No source either, but since you aren't listing your sources, my argument is just as valid. Au contraire. The Oxford English Dictionary is the authoritative historical dictionary of English, published in 1948 by Humphrey S. Milford. Reference: History of the OED (2015). [Online] OED. Available from: http://public.oed.com/history-of-the-oed/ [Accessed December 15, 2015]. With a history spanning over 60 years, this is the dictionary that should be use when clarifying the definitive definitions of a word or phrase. Don't you try that. History has nothing to do with accuracy. The Cambridge University Press has been publishing dictionaries for learners of English since 1995, and are informed by the Cambridge English Corpus, billions of words of real English, and the Cambridge Learner Corpus, a unique collection of exam scripts written by students taking Cambridge ESOL exams all over the world. About Cambridge Dictionaries Online (2015). [Online] Camberidge Dictionaries Online. Available from: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/about.html [Accessed December 15, 2015]. It has everything to do with it, and has nothing to do with examinations such as the ESOL. That would be claiming that examinations validate dictionaries when the other way round is what usually occurs. In reply to your claim that the Cambridge Dictionary has "billions of words", such a feat is easily attained by the OED, which renders your argument invalid. Wrong, the ESOL exams have everything to do with it. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is an international standard for describing language ability. It is used around the world to describe learners’ language skills. The CEFR has six levels – from A1 for the most basic beginner to C2 for the very highest level of ability. The Cambridge examinations cater to every level, including the C2, which shows how trusted it is for high-tier examinations. The OED, however, does not boast such feats. Please do your research before stating a fact. The OED is the go-to dictionary for exams all over the world. Internationally recognised English proficiency exams such as TOEFL and IELTS use it as the source of empirical definitions for words they use in their respective examinations. In addition, the A-levels have had a history of featuring OED-based questions. The AQA examination paper for A level English Language in January 2004 contained a question based on OED entries. Students were asked to comment on the entries giraffe and hippopotamus as part of a section of the course entitled ‘Language Change’. Using the example of TOEFL and IELTS is invalid, because their status as english proficiency exams are lower than that of the CEFR. Their questions are also generally easier. |
Waiting patiently for springtime to return! n_n Join the Social Justice Club now! Everyone dedicated to spreading feminism on MAL is welcome to join! Link to my interview! |
Dec 15, 2015 9:17 AM
#612
CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense? Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword". Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. Two can play the dictionary game, Baita. As according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a person skilled in fighting with a sword". Cambridge English Dictionary. (2015) Cambridge University Press. Accessed: December 15, 2015 And the definition of a person is simple. So Sebastian is a swordsman. Invalid submission. The Cambridge English Dictionary (4th ISBN 9781107619500) does not trump the Oxford English Dictionary (9th ISBN 0-19-479900-X). Invalid as well. No source for claim. The CED's usage is far more than that of Oxford's as according to a school survey. No source either, but since you aren't listing your sources, my argument is just as valid. Au contraire. The Oxford English Dictionary is the authoritative historical dictionary of English, published in 1948 by Humphrey S. Milford. Reference: History of the OED (2015). [Online] OED. Available from: http://public.oed.com/history-of-the-oed/ [Accessed December 15, 2015]. With a history spanning over 60 years, this is the dictionary that should be use when clarifying the definitive definitions of a word or phrase. Don't you try that. History has nothing to do with accuracy. The Cambridge University Press has been publishing dictionaries for learners of English since 1995, and are informed by the Cambridge English Corpus, billions of words of real English, and the Cambridge Learner Corpus, a unique collection of exam scripts written by students taking Cambridge ESOL exams all over the world. About Cambridge Dictionaries Online (2015). [Online] Camberidge Dictionaries Online. Available from: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/about.html [Accessed December 15, 2015]. It has everything to do with it, and has nothing to do with examinations such as the ESOL. That would be claiming that examinations validate dictionaries when the other way round is what usually occurs. In reply to your claim that the Cambridge Dictionary has "billions of words", such a feat is easily attained by the OED, which renders your argument invalid. Wrong, the ESOL exams have everything to do with it. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is an international standard for describing language ability. It is used around the world to describe learners’ language skills. The CEFR has six levels – from A1 for the most basic beginner to C2 for the very highest level of ability. The Cambridge examinations cater to every level, including the C2, which shows how trusted it is for high-tier examinations. The OED, however, does not boast such feats. Please do your research before stating a fact. The OED is the go-to dictionary for exams all over the world. Internationally recognised English proficiency exams such as TOEFL and IELTS use it as the source of empirical definitions for words they use in their respective examinations. In addition, the A-levels have had a history of featuring OED-based questions. The AQA examination paper for A level English Language in January 2004 contained a question based on OED entries. Students were asked to comment on the entries giraffe and hippopotamus as part of a section of the course entitled ‘Language Change’. Using the example of TOEFL and IELTS is invalid, because their status as english proficiency exams are lower than that of the CEFR. Their questions are also generally easier. Incorrect. The CEFR is actually made of different tiers of examinations. If one can compare the A1 CEFR to IELTS, it is obvious that the IELTS trumps it in difficulty. |
Dec 15, 2015 9:17 AM
#613
Dec 15, 2015 9:19 AM
#614
OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense? Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword". Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. Two can play the dictionary game, Baita. As according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a person skilled in fighting with a sword". Cambridge English Dictionary. (2015) Cambridge University Press. Accessed: December 15, 2015 And the definition of a person is simple. So Sebastian is a swordsman. Invalid submission. The Cambridge English Dictionary (4th ISBN 9781107619500) does not trump the Oxford English Dictionary (9th ISBN 0-19-479900-X). Invalid as well. No source for claim. The CED's usage is far more than that of Oxford's as according to a school survey. No source either, but since you aren't listing your sources, my argument is just as valid. Au contraire. The Oxford English Dictionary is the authoritative historical dictionary of English, published in 1948 by Humphrey S. Milford. Reference: History of the OED (2015). [Online] OED. Available from: http://public.oed.com/history-of-the-oed/ [Accessed December 15, 2015]. With a history spanning over 60 years, this is the dictionary that should be use when clarifying the definitive definitions of a word or phrase. Don't you try that. History has nothing to do with accuracy. The Cambridge University Press has been publishing dictionaries for learners of English since 1995, and are informed by the Cambridge English Corpus, billions of words of real English, and the Cambridge Learner Corpus, a unique collection of exam scripts written by students taking Cambridge ESOL exams all over the world. About Cambridge Dictionaries Online (2015). [Online] Camberidge Dictionaries Online. Available from: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/about.html [Accessed December 15, 2015]. It has everything to do with it, and has nothing to do with examinations such as the ESOL. That would be claiming that examinations validate dictionaries when the other way round is what usually occurs. In reply to your claim that the Cambridge Dictionary has "billions of words", such a feat is easily attained by the OED, which renders your argument invalid. Wrong, the ESOL exams have everything to do with it. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is an international standard for describing language ability. It is used around the world to describe learners’ language skills. The CEFR has six levels – from A1 for the most basic beginner to C2 for the very highest level of ability. The Cambridge examinations cater to every level, including the C2, which shows how trusted it is for high-tier examinations. The OED, however, does not boast such feats. Please do your research before stating a fact. The OED is the go-to dictionary for exams all over the world. Internationally recognised English proficiency exams such as TOEFL and IELTS use it as the source of empirical definitions for words they use in their respective examinations. In addition, the A-levels have had a history of featuring OED-based questions. The AQA examination paper for A level English Language in January 2004 contained a question based on OED entries. Students were asked to comment on the entries giraffe and hippopotamus as part of a section of the course entitled ‘Language Change’. Using the example of TOEFL and IELTS is invalid, because their status as english proficiency exams are lower than that of the CEFR. Their questions are also generally easier. Incorrect. The CEFR is actually made of different tiers of examinations. If one can compare the A1 CEFR to IELTS, it is obvious that the IELTS trumps it in difficulty. You're deflecting, Baita. The C2 questions' difficulty is far above that of the IELTS. There is no need to compare or to reference because they are that different. One is for competent, native speakers. The other is an internationally recognised examination to test basic proficiency. |
Waiting patiently for springtime to return! n_n Join the Social Justice Club now! Everyone dedicated to spreading feminism on MAL is welcome to join! Link to my interview! |
Dec 15, 2015 9:20 AM
#615
CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: OneTrueBaita said: CherryLover said: But all this just shows he's a mediocre swordsman. If I had to go for one, it'd be Sebastian from Black Butler. Everything he does, including swordsmanship, is perfect. Swordsman, not swordsdemon Also, Assassin beats him in combat. Can he dodge three simultaneous slashes, all aimed to kill? Are you trying to be literal now? Assassin would be a swordswraith Yes, he can. His movements are far above Assassin's level. There's a reason why he's the perfect butler. Assassin used to be a man. Sebastian never was a man. Which is why the former counts as a swordsman while the latter is as much a swordsman as idk, Crimson Moon is, if he wields his Knight Arm. No, he cannot. A+ agility = more than 50 times faster than the top speed of a normal human's movements. Not even Saber could escape from it, even when her stats got inflated at the end of UBW. That's being very very close-minded. So if you aren't a human or was a human, you can't be a swordsman? Yes, he can. 50 times faster is nothing. Sebastian can easily top that. As you said, he's a demon. Hence human parameters are nothing to him. Please, Cherry. Swordsman. That implies the person is a male human. If you want to describe a non-human using a sword, then just call him/her a sword user. No, he cannot. And I'll leave it at that, since we aren't coming to an agreement in any way. I give up. You're insufferable like this. Why are you using such a literal reading of a term when the term is used in the wider sense? Sebastian is a demon, but he uses swords. Hence, he is a swordsman. Simple as that. No, that's not how it works. As according to the Oxford English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a man who fights with a sword". Oxford English dictionary. (2014) Vol. 2. 8th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Therefore, Sebastian, a demon, cannot be a swordsman. Two can play the dictionary game, Baita. As according to the Cambridge English Dictionary, used widely in defining words in both normal and legal circumstances, a swordsman is "a person skilled in fighting with a sword". Cambridge English Dictionary. (2015) Cambridge University Press. Accessed: December 15, 2015 And the definition of a person is simple. So Sebastian is a swordsman. Invalid submission. The Cambridge English Dictionary (4th ISBN 9781107619500) does not trump the Oxford English Dictionary (9th ISBN 0-19-479900-X). Invalid as well. No source for claim. The CED's usage is far more than that of Oxford's as according to a school survey. No source either, but since you aren't listing your sources, my argument is just as valid. Au contraire. The Oxford English Dictionary is the authoritative historical dictionary of English, published in 1948 by Humphrey S. Milford. Reference: History of the OED (2015). [Online] OED. Available from: http://public.oed.com/history-of-the-oed/ [Accessed December 15, 2015]. With a history spanning over 60 years, this is the dictionary that should be use when clarifying the definitive definitions of a word or phrase. Don't you try that. History has nothing to do with accuracy. The Cambridge University Press has been publishing dictionaries for learners of English since 1995, and are informed by the Cambridge English Corpus, billions of words of real English, and the Cambridge Learner Corpus, a unique collection of exam scripts written by students taking Cambridge ESOL exams all over the world. About Cambridge Dictionaries Online (2015). [Online] Camberidge Dictionaries Online. Available from: http://dictionary.cambridge.org/about.html [Accessed December 15, 2015]. It has everything to do with it, and has nothing to do with examinations such as the ESOL. That would be claiming that examinations validate dictionaries when the other way round is what usually occurs. In reply to your claim that the Cambridge Dictionary has "billions of words", such a feat is easily attained by the OED, which renders your argument invalid. Wrong, the ESOL exams have everything to do with it. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) is an international standard for describing language ability. It is used around the world to describe learners’ language skills. The CEFR has six levels – from A1 for the most basic beginner to C2 for the very highest level of ability. The Cambridge examinations cater to every level, including the C2, which shows how trusted it is for high-tier examinations. The OED, however, does not boast such feats. Please do your research before stating a fact. The OED is the go-to dictionary for exams all over the world. Internationally recognised English proficiency exams such as TOEFL and IELTS use it as the source of empirical definitions for words they use in their respective examinations. In addition, the A-levels have had a history of featuring OED-based questions. The AQA examination paper for A level English Language in January 2004 contained a question based on OED entries. Students were asked to comment on the entries giraffe and hippopotamus as part of a section of the course entitled ‘Language Change’. Using the example of TOEFL and IELTS is invalid, because their status as english proficiency exams are lower than that of the CEFR. Their questions are also generally easier. Incorrect. The CEFR is actually made of different tiers of examinations. If one can compare the A1 CEFR to IELTS, it is obvious that the IELTS trumps it in difficulty. You're deflecting, Baita. The C2 questions' difficulty is far above that of the IELTS. There is no need to compare or to reference because they are that different. One is for competent, native speakers. The other is an internationally recognised examination to test basic proficiency. Then what about the A-levels? Surely that would equal the C2, if not trump it. Are you saying the A-levels, the equivalent to the global standard of the International Baccalaureate and the Advanced Placement system in the USA, cannot trump a European proficiency test? |
Dec 15, 2015 9:22 AM
#616
laidellent said: Cherry,aren't you realizing you are taking part in derailing the thread? I'm sorry, I'll stop now. That troll Baita led me on such a wild chase that I didn't even feel as if I was derailing. |
Waiting patiently for springtime to return! n_n Join the Social Justice Club now! Everyone dedicated to spreading feminism on MAL is welcome to join! Link to my interview! |
Dec 15, 2015 9:28 AM
#617
CherryLover said: Dont blame other for your own action.laidellent said: Cherry,aren't you realizing you are taking part in derailing the thread? I'm sorry, I'll stop now. That troll Baita led me on such a wild chase that I didn't even feel as if I was derailing. |
Dec 15, 2015 9:31 AM
#618
laidellent said: Cherry,aren't you realizing you are taking part in derailing the thread? Why did you do this? ;___; On-topic: Sasaki Kojirou. Cuz. 1. Wields a 190cm sword that shouldn't be that easy to wield at all. Yet he swings it around like a dagger. 2. Fights against multiple Noble Phantasm users with a normal, human-made sword. Repels every one of them, INCLUDING BERSERKER, with the help of Caster. 3. Pisses off Caster, his ribs are turned inside out, continues to speak normally as if nothing happened. 4. Has a skill on the level of an NP, which he got by doing the same thing over and over until reality gave up and let him have that move. |
Dec 15, 2015 9:33 AM
#619
Yu Kanda from D. Gray Man because he is indestructible. |
Dec 15, 2015 9:36 AM
#620
Dec 15, 2015 9:43 AM
#621
laidellent said: Sometimes some people love to pick on individuals just for the sake of circlejerking in their own club. OT:Himura from Ruroini Kenshin His master is better |
Dec 15, 2015 9:44 AM
#622
Is a half-demon a man, and hence a swordsman...? Ahahahaha, that is the question D: |
Dec 15, 2015 9:47 AM
#623
Dec 15, 2015 9:49 AM
#624
If we are listing demons, Sesshomaru with Bakusaiga smashes everyone. |
Dec 15, 2015 9:52 AM
#625
hoopla123 said: Youmu Konpaku smashes uIf we are listing demons, Sesshomaru with Bakusaiga smashes everyone. Weather said: An interesting thing came in ZUN's lastest side story on the newest Music CD. Yojana measure has been canonically confirmed to exist in the Touhouverse: " 「由旬って長さの単位?」 「そう、古代インドの長さの単位で1由旬はおよそ7キロ。 つまり、4万由旬はおよそ28万キロくらいね。 地球の直径が1万2千キロちょっとだから、地球も通り過ぎちゃうわ」 "And 'yojana' is a measure of distance?" "Yes, it's a unit of length from ancient India - one yojana is about seven kilometers, so forty thousand yojana would be about two hundred eighty thousand kilometers. The diameter of the earth is just a little over twelve thousand kilometers, so the distance goes through the earth." Applying this to Youmu's Hell Realm Sword "200 Yojana in 1 Slash" The used number is 7 kilometers per Yojana so... 200 Yojanas x 7km= 1400km Using this http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/speed Using a timeframe of one Second... 1400 km/s= Mach 4,118 Using half a Second.... 2800 km/s= Mach 8,235 Using a quarter of a second... 5600 km/s= Mach 16,470 Ignoring the retardness of using a 1 second (because a sword's slash of one second is idiotic) An average sword's slash should have a shorter timeframe than these but you get the point. Youmu is comfortably in the Sub-relativistic range. ded |
Dec 15, 2015 9:58 AM
#626
AzureDaora said: hoopla123 said: Youmu Konpaku smashes uIf we are listing demons, Sesshomaru with Bakusaiga smashes everyone. Weather said: An interesting thing came in ZUN's lastest side story on the newest Music CD. Yojana measure has been canonically confirmed to exist in the Touhouverse: " 「由旬って長さの単位?」 「そう、古代インドの長さの単位で1由旬はおよそ7キロ。 つまり、4万由旬はおよそ28万キロくらいね。 地球の直径が1万2千キロちょっとだから、地球も通り過ぎちゃうわ」 "And 'yojana' is a measure of distance?" "Yes, it's a unit of length from ancient India - one yojana is about seven kilometers, so forty thousand yojana would be about two hundred eighty thousand kilometers. The diameter of the earth is just a little over twelve thousand kilometers, so the distance goes through the earth." Applying this to Youmu's Hell Realm Sword "200 Yojana in 1 Slash" The used number is 7 kilometers per Yojana so... 200 Yojanas x 7km= 1400km Using this http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/speed Using a timeframe of one Second... 1400 km/s= Mach 4,118 Using half a Second.... 2800 km/s= Mach 8,235 Using a quarter of a second... 5600 km/s= Mach 16,470 Ignoring the retardness of using a 1 second (because a sword's slash of one second is idiotic) An average sword's slash should have a shorter timeframe than these but you get the point. Youmu is comfortably in the Sub-relativistic range. ded Sesshomaru spams energy waves from his sword that can cut through a 1000 demons in one wave. Bakusaiga is also one shot one kill with anti regen capabilities and destroys anything that is connected to the sword wound. If he also uses and spams Mediou Zangetsuha, she would literally be sucked into hell. ded |
Dec 15, 2015 10:00 AM
#627
hoopla123 said: AzureDaora said: hoopla123 said: If we are listing demons, Sesshomaru with Bakusaiga smashes everyone. Weather said: An interesting thing came in ZUN's lastest side story on the newest Music CD. Yojana measure has been canonically confirmed to exist in the Touhouverse: " 「由旬って長さの単位?」 「そう、古代インドの長さの単位で1由旬はおよそ7キロ。 つまり、4万由旬はおよそ28万キロくらいね。 地球の直径が1万2千キロちょっとだから、地球も通り過ぎちゃうわ」 "And 'yojana' is a measure of distance?" "Yes, it's a unit of length from ancient India - one yojana is about seven kilometers, so forty thousand yojana would be about two hundred eighty thousand kilometers. The diameter of the earth is just a little over twelve thousand kilometers, so the distance goes through the earth." Applying this to Youmu's Hell Realm Sword "200 Yojana in 1 Slash" The used number is 7 kilometers per Yojana so... 200 Yojanas x 7km= 1400km Using this http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/speed Using a timeframe of one Second... 1400 km/s= Mach 4,118 Using half a Second.... 2800 km/s= Mach 8,235 Using a quarter of a second... 5600 km/s= Mach 16,470 Ignoring the retardness of using a 1 second (because a sword's slash of one second is idiotic) An average sword's slash should have a shorter timeframe than these but you get the point. Youmu is comfortably in the Sub-relativistic range. ded Sesshomaru spams energy waves from his sword that can cut through a 1000 demons in one wave. Bakusaiga is also one shot one kill with anti regen capabilities and destroys anything that is connected to the sword wound. If he also uses and spams Mediou Zangetsuha, she would literally be sucked into hell. ded Butbutbut are we including demons in the term "swordsman"...? |
Dec 15, 2015 10:12 AM
#628
OneTrueBaita said: hoopla123 said: AzureDaora said: hoopla123 said: Youmu Konpaku smashes uIf we are listing demons, Sesshomaru with Bakusaiga smashes everyone. Weather said: An interesting thing came in ZUN's lastest side story on the newest Music CD. Yojana measure has been canonically confirmed to exist in the Touhouverse: " 「由旬って長さの単位?」 「そう、古代インドの長さの単位で1由旬はおよそ7キロ。 つまり、4万由旬はおよそ28万キロくらいね。 地球の直径が1万2千キロちょっとだから、地球も通り過ぎちゃうわ」 "And 'yojana' is a measure of distance?" "Yes, it's a unit of length from ancient India - one yojana is about seven kilometers, so forty thousand yojana would be about two hundred eighty thousand kilometers. The diameter of the earth is just a little over twelve thousand kilometers, so the distance goes through the earth." Applying this to Youmu's Hell Realm Sword "200 Yojana in 1 Slash" The used number is 7 kilometers per Yojana so... 200 Yojanas x 7km= 1400km Using this http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/speed Using a timeframe of one Second... 1400 km/s= Mach 4,118 Using half a Second.... 2800 km/s= Mach 8,235 Using a quarter of a second... 5600 km/s= Mach 16,470 Ignoring the retardness of using a 1 second (because a sword's slash of one second is idiotic) An average sword's slash should have a shorter timeframe than these but you get the point. Youmu is comfortably in the Sub-relativistic range. ded Sesshomaru spams energy waves from his sword that can cut through a 1000 demons in one wave. Bakusaiga is also one shot one kill with anti regen capabilities and destroys anything that is connected to the sword wound. If he also uses and spams Mediou Zangetsuha, she would literally be sucked into hell. ded Butbutbut are we including demons in the term "swordsman"...? People were posting a bunch of half/full demons here so I thought I'd do it too. |
Dec 15, 2015 10:15 AM
#629
hoopla123 said: OneTrueBaita said: hoopla123 said: AzureDaora said: hoopla123 said: Youmu Konpaku smashes uIf we are listing demons, Sesshomaru with Bakusaiga smashes everyone. Weather said: An interesting thing came in ZUN's lastest side story on the newest Music CD. Yojana measure has been canonically confirmed to exist in the Touhouverse: " 「由旬って長さの単位?」 「そう、古代インドの長さの単位で1由旬はおよそ7キロ。 つまり、4万由旬はおよそ28万キロくらいね。 地球の直径が1万2千キロちょっとだから、地球も通り過ぎちゃうわ」 "And 'yojana' is a measure of distance?" "Yes, it's a unit of length from ancient India - one yojana is about seven kilometers, so forty thousand yojana would be about two hundred eighty thousand kilometers. The diameter of the earth is just a little over twelve thousand kilometers, so the distance goes through the earth." Applying this to Youmu's Hell Realm Sword "200 Yojana in 1 Slash" The used number is 7 kilometers per Yojana so... 200 Yojanas x 7km= 1400km Using this http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/speed Using a timeframe of one Second... 1400 km/s= Mach 4,118 Using half a Second.... 2800 km/s= Mach 8,235 Using a quarter of a second... 5600 km/s= Mach 16,470 Ignoring the retardness of using a 1 second (because a sword's slash of one second is idiotic) An average sword's slash should have a shorter timeframe than these but you get the point. Youmu is comfortably in the Sub-relativistic range. ded Sesshomaru spams energy waves from his sword that can cut through a 1000 demons in one wave. Bakusaiga is also one shot one kill with anti regen capabilities and destroys anything that is connected to the sword wound. If he also uses and spams Mediou Zangetsuha, she would literally be sucked into hell. ded Butbutbut are we including demons in the term "swordsman"...? People were posting a bunch of half/full demons here so I thought I'd do it too. kk lemme just go get my demon too~ |
Dec 15, 2015 10:29 AM
#630
hoopla123 said: Youmu lives in heaven lmao, being sucked into hell would be no problemAzureDaora said: hoopla123 said: If we are listing demons, Sesshomaru with Bakusaiga smashes everyone. Weather said: An interesting thing came in ZUN's lastest side story on the newest Music CD. Yojana measure has been canonically confirmed to exist in the Touhouverse: " 「由旬って長さの単位?」 「そう、古代インドの長さの単位で1由旬はおよそ7キロ。 つまり、4万由旬はおよそ28万キロくらいね。 地球の直径が1万2千キロちょっとだから、地球も通り過ぎちゃうわ」 "And 'yojana' is a measure of distance?" "Yes, it's a unit of length from ancient India - one yojana is about seven kilometers, so forty thousand yojana would be about two hundred eighty thousand kilometers. The diameter of the earth is just a little over twelve thousand kilometers, so the distance goes through the earth." Applying this to Youmu's Hell Realm Sword "200 Yojana in 1 Slash" The used number is 7 kilometers per Yojana so... 200 Yojanas x 7km= 1400km Using this http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/speed Using a timeframe of one Second... 1400 km/s= Mach 4,118 Using half a Second.... 2800 km/s= Mach 8,235 Using a quarter of a second... 5600 km/s= Mach 16,470 Ignoring the retardness of using a 1 second (because a sword's slash of one second is idiotic) An average sword's slash should have a shorter timeframe than these but you get the point. Youmu is comfortably in the Sub-relativistic range. ded Sesshomaru spams energy waves from his sword that can cut through a 1000 demons in one wave. Bakusaiga is also one shot one kill with anti regen capabilities and destroys anything that is connected to the sword wound. If he also uses and spams Mediou Zangetsuha, she would literally be sucked into hell. ded Youmu's two swords, Hakurouken and Roukanken, the former can cut through anything, and the latter can "cut" wandering spirits in order for them to reach enlightenment. She is also really damn old, considering that she's already dead. and I'm pretty sure 1000 spirits in one wave is nothing compared to 200 Yojana in one slash, from which youmu can make several in less than a second. 1 yojana can take up to more than a 1000 spirits, let alone 200. Characters like Remilia can circle the moon in several seconds, Aya is faster than Remilia, and Aya can't even see Youmu. Aya is confirmed Faster Than Light, btw. The battle starts and Sesshoumaru doesn't even get to lift his sword. |
Dec 15, 2015 10:34 AM
#631
...Saber? |
Dec 15, 2015 10:47 AM
#632
robis798 said: ...Saber? Assassin is canonically better than Saber in swordsmanship. Isn't Shichika considered a sword rather than a swordsman? The real swordswoman there would be Togame. Though she isn't with him anymore at his prime |
OudissyDec 15, 2015 10:53 AM
Dec 15, 2015 10:51 AM
#633
laidellent said: GaryL said: laidellent said: Sometimes some people love to pick on individuals just for the sake of circlejerking in their own club. OT:Himura from Ruroini Kenshin His master is better Personal bias :0 But yeah Hiko had mastered Hiten Mitsurugi Ryū perfectly IIRC. The mangaka said Seijuro is the strongest character in the manga, so I take his word for it lol |
Dec 15, 2015 12:15 PM
#634
Well if non-humans are allowed then Masaki Tenchi/Kami Tenchi He uses a sword He's the all-powerful god of his verse So that basically means he's omnipotent/scient/present So he knows all sword techniques that existed, exist and will exist in the multiverse |
Dec 15, 2015 12:16 PM
#635
_Peksi said: Well if non-humans are allowed then Masaki Tenchi/Kami Tenchi He uses a sword He's the all-powerful god of his verse So that basically means he's omnipotent/scient/present So he knows all sword techniques that existed, exist and will exist in the multiverse Which of the Tenchi series is that in ?Haven't seen it in Ryo-Ohki or Tenchi Muyo ! |
Wohooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo |
Dec 15, 2015 12:27 PM
#636
Baitdragon16 said: _Peksi said: Well if non-humans are allowed then Masaki Tenchi/Kami Tenchi He uses a sword He's the all-powerful god of his verse So that basically means he's omnipotent/scient/present So he knows all sword techniques that existed, exist and will exist in the multiverse Which of the Tenchi series is that in ?Haven't seen it in Ryo-Ohki or Tenchi Muyo ! It's in Ryo-Ohki actually. The thing that stops Counter-Actor is Kami Tenchi, the true god that the Choushin wanted to find. Kami Tenchi is essentially what Masaki will eventually become. |
Dec 15, 2015 12:29 PM
#637
_Peksi said: Baitdragon16 said: _Peksi said: Well if non-humans are allowed then Masaki Tenchi/Kami Tenchi He uses a sword He's the all-powerful god of his verse So that basically means he's omnipotent/scient/present So he knows all sword techniques that existed, exist and will exist in the multiverse Which of the Tenchi series is that in ?Haven't seen it in Ryo-Ohki or Tenchi Muyo ! It's in Ryo-Ohki actually. The thing that stops Counter-Actor is Kami Tenchi, the true god that the Choushin wanted to find. Kami Tenchi is essentially what Masaki will eventually become. Oh ,but did they explain all that ? Hmm I guess I just didn't notice .Gonna watch the last few eps again . |
Wohooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo |
Dec 15, 2015 12:34 PM
#638
Baitdragon16 said: _Peksi said: Baitdragon16 said: _Peksi said: Well if non-humans are allowed then Masaki Tenchi/Kami Tenchi He uses a sword He's the all-powerful god of his verse So that basically means he's omnipotent/scient/present So he knows all sword techniques that existed, exist and will exist in the multiverse Which of the Tenchi series is that in ?Haven't seen it in Ryo-Ohki or Tenchi Muyo ! It's in Ryo-Ohki actually. The thing that stops Counter-Actor is Kami Tenchi, the true god that the Choushin wanted to find. Kami Tenchi is essentially what Masaki will eventually become. Oh ,but did they explain all that ? Hmm I guess I just didn't notice .Gonna watch the last few eps again . I don't think it was ever fully explained, but the implications are pretty clear. |
Dec 15, 2015 12:56 PM
#639
Dec 15, 2015 1:55 PM
#640
Guts, Zoro, Kenshin or mihawk |
Dec 15, 2015 2:00 PM
#641
Kirito, he is basically a god. He was killed, then came back from death from sheer will power. No one can defeat someone like him. Plus SAO was really well written so you can get a feel for his sword style and how powerful it is. |
Dec 15, 2015 8:44 PM
#642
19990930 said: Kirito, he is basically a god. He was killed, then came back from death from sheer will power. No one can defeat someone like him. Plus SAO was really well written so you can get a feel for his sword style and how powerful it is. K. But he's not a real swordsman. |
Dec 15, 2015 8:48 PM
#643
I want to say Ryu Hayabusa.. but really, idk. I guess Ichigo |
Dec 16, 2015 12:26 AM
#644
Dec 16, 2015 12:30 AM
#645
Guts, if you can call his slab of metal a sword. |
Dec 16, 2015 12:32 AM
#646
Does he count? |
This topic has been locked and is no longer available for discussion.
More topics from this board
» Upcoming Dubbed Anime ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Kenny_Stryker - Dec 17, 2017 |
3985 |
by appledude1221
»»
12 minutes ago |
|
» 🍉 Summer 2025: Anime of the Season (AOTS) ( 1 2 3 4 )nirererin - Oct 9 |
171 |
by GrumbleDango
»»
13 minutes ago |
|
» The "Backstory" Problemsimonitro - 4 hours ago |
18 |
by ColourWheel
»»
16 minutes ago |
|
» Are there Anime songs you like but haven't seen the anime?Dragevard - Oct 9 |
18 |
by W3TFT
»»
16 minutes ago |
|
» What's the name for this concept?thewiru - 1 hour ago |
7 |
by aReviewer
»»
20 minutes ago |