Isterio said:
What can possibly happen to the main cast/memorable supportive cast of One Piece before the series end. In all honesty? Law got his arm cut off and stiched back on.
Many things can happen. Possibilities create tension, as you said, but while there is not much possibility of death, there are many other situations that could go more than one way.
Sabaody? Anyone died there? No. Was the tension at fucking sky level? Yes, it was. That arc perfectly shows what I'm talking about. None of the main cast died, and by that time we knew just as much as we know now that they won't, and yet the tension was there. Why? Not becasue of "will they survive?" question, but because of "how will they survive?" and by getting them as close to death as possible. It's a trick. We know they won't die, but then Oda drops a situation that seems impossible to escape and that makes us start doubting the no death policy. And then the tension rises becasue what if this is the arc where he breaks the pattern?
Impel Down - did anyone die? No. Was the tension high? Yes. Why? Because of the time limit or the danger that is not based on life and death situation but freedom and imprisonment. We couldn't be sure whether all the characters escape. Bon-chan didn't.
and then there is ace
now let me remind you it is not about whether Ace dies or not. Not this arc. This arc is about whether Luffy is going to reach him before the time runs out. While the event is getting him closer to death, the death itself is not the cause of the tension. It's the task at Luffy's hand that he may or may not fail to accomplish.
Marineford, aside from showing actual deaths, presented the suffering of the main hero which in itself is something that can easily replace the death's place in tension building. Though I know that this would make a much better argument if characters in OP actually went through some serious development, but oh well.
So we have separation, imprisonment, suffering. None is death, yet all are fueling tension.
Enies Lobby - the tension of the arc comes not from the "will robin die or not" but "will they reach her before she crosses the gate of justice"
and even if we assumed that SH are never going to die in this series, the tension was still there, becasue the story could have easily continue into another rescue arc had robin actually went through the gate. So there was no guarantee whether they will save her or not this arc, and that created tension.
Skypiea had the tension built destruction of land, rather than death of people. Enel destroyed whole damn island and he was about to destroy rest of the sky islands and entire upped yard. And once again lack of deaths has nothing to do with tension, because the thing we couldn't be sure about is whether he destroy the sacred ground and homes of all skypieans or not.
Thriller Bark - Kuma wanted to TAKE Luffy, not kill him. A situation similiar to Enies Lobby. If Luffy was taken, a rescue arc could have happened easily, so we couldn't be sure whether someone will stop Kuma or not. And that results in tension. Without anyone's life being in danger.
Fishman island also had tension, not because someone life's was in danger, or becasue of hody. Similiarly to Skypiea, tension was built by the danger of the destruction of Fishman Island. We were told that Luffy will destroy it, but we weren't sure when. It could have been that arc, because it made sense, and that gave us tension.
Dressrosa had the perfect opportnity for some tense moments with the mera mera fruit, but Oda dropped the ball here. We weren't sure about who's gonna eat it, or who's gonna win what round in the tournament, so that was what built the tension in that subplot (the fact that it was meh-ly written all in all is another matter)
As you have said, possibilities create tension, and there is always a possibility of something bad, other than death, happening.
And remember I'm not arguing whether PH or DR have tension, I'm just saying that death is not the only way to create it. |