Ahenshihael said:DeathfireD said:
It's not that we doubt the series as a whole. It's more like we're surprised/mad that the first quarter of it is utter garbage.
No its not. Even the worst episode 2 beats everything in FMA1.
I'm reading the manga and watching both adaptations simultaneously and although I prefer Brotherhood so far, FMA1 has its strengths as well. That FMA2 is superior in every regard is YOUR opinion, not a fact. The problem that some people have with your statements is that you don't seem to realize there's a difference between those two.Ahenshihael said:AtomicNerd said:
Constructive criticisms or comparisons where FMA > FMA Brotherhood doesn't seem welcomed here. Which is a shame, since I thought this was a place for discussion.
WHAT constructive criticism? Such thing never happened in FMA:B threads till now. ;
There has been constructive criticism in the threads that I read so far. In most cases, you swoop in afterwards and tell them that they are plain wrong. Again, YOUR opinion. That does not make the criticism any less constructive.robbydesu said:And news flash! People are entitled to have their own opinion no matter what it is or however extreme it may seem to be for others. This also applies to how people are entitled to have their own taste and preferences in anime. Just because an individual doesn't like something or he/she doesn't think something is funny, doesn't mean that it'll be the same with others.
I completely agree with you. Sadly you only used this logic to defend Fai and not others' valid opinions against Fai calling them wrong and stupid. Maybe something to think about...Ahenshihael said:magelet said:
What you have to realize Atomic, is that the reason why some of us (Fai especially) get so worked up over the FMA:B vs FMA1 comparisons, is that we feel like people are just dismissing FMA:B without giving it a chance because they keep comparing it to FMA1. And that frustrates us because we really think FMA:B is an amazing series so far.
Not to mention that we(I) just dont want to see people obnoxiously comparing 52 episode series they saw ~Y years ago to 11 episodes of newly airing anime, just for the sake of nostalgic nitpicking AND THEN getting pissed that someone compared their fma1 to manga in similar obnoxious manner.
FMA:B is an amazing series so far, no questions there. And from what I heard much of the later episodes of FMA1 are completely different from the manga, so it's not logical to directly compare both adaptations. However, I think a comparison between episodes covering roughly the same story elements, e.g. comparing Lior arc (Ep3 BH vs. Ep1-2 FMA), is fair and justified. Ultimately, which story or art style you prefer comes down to personal preference. noteDhero said:It's strange to me that people who say "Don't compare FMA to FMA:B or the manga" do the same thing, in often the same breath. I also find it weird that people on that side believe that everyone who feels like the show is rushed is immediately comparing it to the first series and not looking at the show by itself. We are totally capable as functioning humans to say "This was not done as well as it was done here," and be looking at them based on their merits as separate shows.
Moreover I think it's ridiculous to say that because you liked one show means you won't like the other. These things aren't mutually exclusive. People can like parts of one show and a like parts of another.
The problem is when people get into extremes and start talking about the majority as though it is some infallible God.
Finally something worth quoting! My thoughts exactly. I don't base my judgement solely on how closely the anime follows the manga. I want to be entertained and if the anime does a better job at it than the manga or another adaptation, I welcome the change. That doesn't take anything away from my enjoyment of the original manga, it just adds to the quality of the animated version.