I feel like there's a distinction between A) 'dumb/annoying because it contradicts/interferes with story/overall tone/plot progression (or because it ignores previously established story foundations/build-up),' and B) 'dumb/annoying because the viewer cannot handle a certain type of character being used in a certain way, irrespective of their overall contribution to the story.' Obviously there's some overlap in these two very arbitrary categories that I just set up.
To further divide the latter distinction: 1) a character that (supposedly) uses cheap tricks and laughs as attempted comedy, 2) a character that overuses cheap tropes and clichés that the viewer is already aware of, and thus lacks in originality and/or storytelling tact (which may or may not be for comedy), and 3) a character archetype/several personality traits that the viewer simply cannot stand (the most susceptible to variances in taste).
NextUniverse said: is it actually a bad thing for there to be annoying characters?
This heavily depends on the tone of the show in question, and exactly what 'annoying' means.
- What I find personally annoying specifically in comedy shows, is that some characters exist mainly for the purpose of creating new problems that the other characters must resolve, and said resolution is both the plot point of the show (or just limited to some episodes) and where the comedy comes from. Some of the characters in this category have been incredibly annoying to me, but at the same time without their mishaps the entire show risks becoming monotonous and uneventful: I've decided to just accept this as a necessary evil. Of course I'd prefer that I wouldn't have to deal with this necessary evil at all, and have the characters having a role to fulfill other than to be the troll that causes havoc, but not every show can satisfy this condition, and I'm not sure that I'd want every show to be this way.
- In predominantly non-comedic shows where characters are 'annoying' to provide some levity to the show, a lot depends on when, how & how long the joke is delivered, and whether the show can seamlessly transition from said comedic scene to a 'serious' scene. This is pretty damn subjective, so I won't elaborate further.
For most non-comedic cases, though, I think most characters can be justified as a portrayal of fictional characters being subjected to unrealistic cases, as long as they're supported by good writing.
Man, writing this wall of text made me realize why people might not like some of my favorite anime. Thanks OP, I guess?
TL;DR, characters are dumb/annoying when the writing/comedic delivery is poor. |