New
Jan 16, 2016 8:14 AM
#801
SuperRed said: Immahnoob is unbanned 0_0 The Return of the Solvite when? One can only pray. |
Jan 16, 2016 8:40 AM
#802
Jan 16, 2016 8:44 AM
#803
1) 237 minutes in length 2) The movie title appearing after one hour of running time 3) A drag 4) Tosatsu 5) Kung-fu 6) Sex 7) Genital gore 8) Ultraviolence 9) Lesbians 10) A "Virgin Mary" 11) Erections 12) Ass-kicking female teens 13) Psychotic menopausal bitches 14) Pornographic furniture 15) A Joshuu 701-gô: Sasori (1972) tribute with a pinky film spoof character called "Miss Scorpion" 16) Love 17) Romance 18) "Exposure" 19) Lust 20) Betrayal 21) Child abuse 22) Perversions 23) A dead bird 24) A living bird 25) Panties 26) Catholicism 27) Religious idolatry 28) Religious blasphemy 29) A car chase 30) Implied pedophilia 31) A porn industry 32) Ravel's Boléro 33) A demented and disturbing climax 34) An emotionally pulse-pounding and extremely moving ending 35) Corinthians XIII recited in an impossibly flawlessly and perfectly timed, dramatic way by the sea in a single shot while Beethoven's 7th Symphony in A Major, Op. 92: II. Allegretto plays in the background 36) In one word: Japan Love Exposure seems like a wild ride. |
Jan 16, 2016 8:45 AM
#804
Kokko said: 1) 237 minutes in length 2) The movie title appearing after one hour of running time 3) A drag 4) Tosatsu 5) Kung-fu 6) Sex 7) Genital gore 8) Ultraviolence 9) Lesbians 10) A "Virgin Mary" 11) Erections 12) Ass-kicking female teens 13) Psychotic menopausal bitches 14) Pornographic furniture 15) A Joshuu 701-gô: Sasori (1972) tribute with a pinky film spoof character called "Miss Scorpion" 16) Love 17) Romance 18) "Exposure" 19) Lust 20) Betrayal 21) Child abuse 22) Perversions 23) A dead bird 24) A living bird 25) Panties 26) Catholicism 27) Religious idolatry 28) Religious blasphemy 29) A car chase 30) Implied pedophilia 31) A porn industry 32) Ravel's Boléro 33) A demented and disturbing climax 34) An emotionally pulse-pounding and extremely moving ending 35) Corinthians XIII recited in an impossibly flawlessly and perfectly timed, dramatic way by the sea in a single shot while Beethoven's 7th Symphony in A Major, Op. 92: II. Allegretto plays in the background 36) In one word: Japan Love Exposure seems like a wild ride. stopped reading after genital gore nothx |
I probably regret this post by now. |
Jan 16, 2016 8:49 AM
#805
Pullman said: Kokko said: 1) 237 minutes in length 2) The movie title appearing after one hour of running time 3) A drag 4) Tosatsu 5) Kung-fu 6) Sex 7) Genital gore 8) Ultraviolence 9) Lesbians 10) A "Virgin Mary" 11) Erections 12) Ass-kicking female teens 13) Psychotic menopausal bitches 14) Pornographic furniture 15) A Joshuu 701-gô: Sasori (1972) tribute with a pinky film spoof character called "Miss Scorpion" 16) Love 17) Romance 18) "Exposure" 19) Lust 20) Betrayal 21) Child abuse 22) Perversions 23) A dead bird 24) A living bird 25) Panties 26) Catholicism 27) Religious idolatry 28) Religious blasphemy 29) A car chase 30) Implied pedophilia 31) A porn industry 32) Ravel's Boléro 33) A demented and disturbing climax 34) An emotionally pulse-pounding and extremely moving ending 35) Corinthians XIII recited in an impossibly flawlessly and perfectly timed, dramatic way by the sea in a single shot while Beethoven's 7th Symphony in A Major, Op. 92: II. Allegretto plays in the background 36) In one word: Japan Love Exposure seems like a wild ride. stopped reading after genital gore nothx Soft |
Jan 16, 2016 8:50 AM
#806
Kokko said: 1) 237 minutes in length 2) The movie title appearing after one hour of running time 3) A drag 4) Tosatsu 5) Kung-fu 6) Sex 7) Genital gore 8) Ultraviolence 9) Lesbians 10) A "Virgin Mary" 11) Erections 12) Ass-kicking female teens 13) Psychotic menopausal bitches 14) Pornographic furniture 15) A Joshuu 701-gô: Sasori (1972) tribute with a pinky film spoof character called "Miss Scorpion" 16) Love 17) Romance 18) "Exposure" 19) Lust 20) Betrayal 21) Child abuse 22) Perversions 23) A dead bird 24) A living bird 25) Panties 26) Catholicism 27) Religious idolatry 28) Religious blasphemy 29) A car chase 30) Implied pedophilia 31) A porn industry 32) Ravel's Boléro 33) A demented and disturbing climax 34) An emotionally pulse-pounding and extremely moving ending 35) Corinthians XIII recited in an impossibly flawlessly and perfectly timed, dramatic way by the sea in a single shot while Beethoven's 7th Symphony in A Major, Op. 92: II. Allegretto plays in the background 36) In one word: Japan Love Exposure seems like a wild ride. tfw I downloaded the movie a few days ago without having the slightest idea what I signed up for. Only read the first few points before stopping tho, I'd rather find out for myself. |
Jan 16, 2016 8:50 AM
#807
ero guro best gore |
"Be who you are and say what you mean, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind" - Dr. Seuss |
Jan 16, 2016 8:54 AM
#808
The film gained a considerable amount of notoriety in film festivals around the world for its four-hour duration and themes including love, family, lust, religion and the art of upskirt photography. #deep |
Jan 16, 2016 8:55 AM
#809
Kokko said: The film gained a considerable amount of notoriety in film festivals around the world for its four-hour duration and themes including love, family, lust, religion and the art of upskirt photography. #deep WTF!? I just checked and sure enough, it's four hours long, lmao. I didn't know. I would have probably started watching and wondering why there was no end in sight after 2h or so. |
Jan 16, 2016 9:02 AM
#810
I checked out Her on Letterboxd and nobody of the people I've followed have seen it, wut? I thought at least 1 would have since it's one of the most popular movies on Letterboxd. Everyone who watches movies can rectify it now at least :> |
Jan 16, 2016 9:15 AM
#811
Kokko said: I checked out Her on Letterboxd and nobody of the people I've followed have seen it, wut? [yt]WzV6mXIOV l4[/y t] I thought at least 1 would have since it's one of the most popular movies on Letterboxd. Everyone who watches movies can rectify it now at least :> I saw like the first hour, it was pretty average imo and didn't keep my attention. I wasn't planning to watch it though it was just on tv. |
Jan 16, 2016 9:45 AM
#812
The first episode of Fullmetal Alchemist was actually pretty meh. I'm not a fan of being rushed into a situation without proper context. |
Jan 16, 2016 9:50 AM
#813
TripleSRank said: The first episode of Fullmetal Alchemist was actually pretty meh. I'm not a fan of being rushed into a situation without proper context. Are you sure you are watching the first one and not Brotherhood? |
Jan 16, 2016 9:52 AM
#814
TripleSRank said: Brotherhood or 03? I saw the first episode of Brotherhood a while ago and was super confused since the manga doesn't start with that.The first episode of Fullmetal Alchemist was actually pretty meh. I'm not a fan of being rushed into a situation without proper context. |
Jan 16, 2016 9:54 AM
#815
just to make it clear i'm going to be an assassin in BnS. also episode 2 of fma:b is like one of the greatest episodes i've ever seen ;-; |
"Hi!" |
Jan 16, 2016 9:57 AM
#816
robis798 said: TripleSRank said: The first episode of Fullmetal Alchemist was actually pretty meh. I'm not a fan of being rushed into a situation without proper context. Are you sure you are watching the first one and not Brotherhood? The first episode involved the two brothers arriving at a town that worshiped a sun god called Leto. The high priest turned out to be an alchemist with a ring that they think is the Philosopher's Stone. At the end of the episode it was revealed that Eric's body is partly made of metal, and Al's body is entirely metal. Funimation has the dubbed version here. I would be quite surprised if this was Brotherhood rather than the original. Feaor said: TripleSRank said: Brotherhood or 03? I saw the first episode of Brotherhood a while ago and was super confused since the manga doesn't start with that.The first episode of Fullmetal Alchemist was actually pretty meh. I'm not a fan of being rushed into a situation without proper context. I'm 98% sure that it's 03. Edit: Yeah, this is definitely 03. |
TripleSRankJan 16, 2016 10:03 AM
Jan 16, 2016 10:01 AM
#817
FMA 03 covers the beginning of FMA manga much better than Brotherhood does, second half of Brotherhood stomps both though (inb4 anti-shonen/anti-happy ending edgelords) |
Jan 16, 2016 10:05 AM
#818
SuperRed said: FMA 03 covers the beginning of FMA manga much better than Brotherhood does, second half of Brotherhood stomps both though (inb4 anti-shonen/anti-happy ending edgelords) It's probably a good thing I started with 03 then. They've only provided the bare minimum in terms of context even here, imo. I won't mind if it clears up in an episode or two, though. |
Jan 16, 2016 10:05 AM
#819
I still remember the day I started FMA:Brotherhood and the disappointment I felt when I realized it wasn't a sequel a couple of episodes in ;_; |
Jan 16, 2016 10:09 AM
#820
FloatsBoats said: I still remember the day I started FMA:Brotherhood and the disappointment I felt when I realized it wasn't a sequel a couple of episodes in ;_; Happened to me with Fate/Zero. I thought Fate/Zero was 2 seasons with 58 episodes, 24 episodes per season. Turns out its sequel was Fate/Stay Night. Which, it literally is, but I'm talking like 3 years ago when it was Deen/Stay Night. |
"Hi!" |
Jan 16, 2016 10:19 AM
#821
I think I'm going to start Brotherhood next, too bad I didn't finish the manga so I can't source fag about it. |
Jan 16, 2016 10:32 AM
#822
Jan 16, 2016 10:35 AM
#823
I think Ajin has the edgiest ED I've ever seen. Think about the one for Panty & Stocking but non-comedic (well unless you count unintentional humor). TripleSRank said: The first episode of Fullmetal Alchemist was actually pretty meh. I'm not a fan of being rushed into a situation without proper context. It was pretty alright. FMA 03 starts things a little small by focusing on just a small piece of it's setting before expanding outwards. I like that approach more then what Brotherhood did with it's 1st episode at least. |
Jan 16, 2016 10:36 AM
#824
TripleSRank said: SuperRed said: FMA 03 covers the beginning of FMA manga much better than Brotherhood does, second half of Brotherhood stomps both though (inb4 anti-shonen/anti-happy ending edgelords) It's probably a good thing I started with 03 then. They've only provided the bare minimum in terms of context even here, imo. I won't mind if it clears up in an episode or two, though. its just the first episode |
Jan 16, 2016 10:37 AM
#825
I've read the beginning of the manga so that's not really needed. Also it's for Zerg's challenge, it's the #1 ranked fantasy show which is apparently one of my least favorite genres according to malgraph. |
Jan 16, 2016 10:37 AM
#826
gedata said: I think Ajin has the edgiest ED I've ever seen. Think about the one for Panty & Stocking but non-comedic def wont be watching that show |
Jan 16, 2016 10:38 AM
#827
Jan 16, 2016 10:38 AM
#828
Jan 16, 2016 10:39 AM
#829
cupc said: tfw we lost our get_rightWe lost the first game after floatsboats left R.I.P carry Instead we got some ruski kid fuck, i suck |
Jan 16, 2016 10:41 AM
#830
Since we talked about Masashi Ishihama yesterday... his new movie just came out. It looks like trash at first glance, but I'll check it out anyways. |
Jan 16, 2016 10:42 AM
#831
Jan 16, 2016 10:42 AM
#832
gedata said: TripleSRank said: The first episode of Fullmetal Alchemist was actually pretty meh. I'm not a fan of being rushed into a situation without proper context. It was pretty alright. FMA 03 starts things a little small by focusing on just a small piece of it's setting before expanding outwards. I like that approach more then what Brotherhood did with it's 1st episode at least. It managed to clear up why Eric is after the Philosopher's Stone with the second episode, but the lack of explanation for how alchemy works is really going to annoy me if they don't clear it up sometime soon. Eric and Al may as well be able to do literally anything save resurrecting the dead, given how little explanation we have for how they did some of the things they did. |
Jan 16, 2016 10:46 AM
#833
TripleSRank said: gedata said: TripleSRank said: The first episode of Fullmetal Alchemist was actually pretty meh. I'm not a fan of being rushed into a situation without proper context. It was pretty alright. FMA 03 starts things a little small by focusing on just a small piece of it's setting before expanding outwards. I like that approach more then what Brotherhood did with it's 1st episode at least. It managed to clear up why Eric is after the Philosopher's Stone with the second episode, but the lack of explanation for how alchemy works is really going to annoy me if they don't explain it sometime soon. Eric and Al may as well be able to do literally anything save resurrecting the dead, given how little explanation we have for how they did some of the things they did. I think they managed to show it pretty well in the first ep O_O They can just change any material (along with its shape) into a different one, while the overall mass remains the same. Al needs to draw a symbol to do it, while Ed just claps his hands before using alchemy. It was pretty straightforward imho, and while the limits weren't clearly defined, I think that common sense can fill the holes in regards to the transmutations' range and scale. |
Jan 16, 2016 10:46 AM
#834
TripleSRank said: gedata said: TripleSRank said: The first episode of Fullmetal Alchemist was actually pretty meh. I'm not a fan of being rushed into a situation without proper context. It was pretty alright. FMA 03 starts things a little small by focusing on just a small piece of it's setting before expanding outwards. I like that approach more then what Brotherhood did with it's 1st episode at least. It managed to clear up why Eric is after the Philosopher's Stone with the second episode, but the lack of explanation for how alchemy works is really going to annoy me if they don't explain it sometime soon. Eric and Al may as well be able to do literally anything save resurrecting the dead, given how little explanation we have for how they did some of the things they did. It's just simple matter manipulation, as in, they can change the shape and atomic make-up of things, but without creating new matter. Basically just magic that operates under some laws of science like the conservation of mass. The stone their looking for allows them to break said laws and make whatever they want, as much as they want. |
gedataJan 16, 2016 10:50 AM
Jan 16, 2016 10:52 AM
#835
If that's the case, then, in episode 2: Where did the stone wall come from? It literally popped up out of nowhere, and there was no indication that some of the sand was transformed into it. Similarly, in episode one a spear also appeared to come from nothing. How did that happen? What was sacrificed to make objects move? If a certain amount of mass of one thing is required to that same amount of mass in another, shouldn't similar rules apply to energy/manipulation of objects? Also, how is Eric able to do this without a transmutation circle? At first it was explained as being due to his badge being some sort of amplifier, but then he proceeded to do the same thing without it. Stuff like this makes the alchemy seem very poorly fleshed out, to me. I'm not asking for spoilers, but the episodes in question did not make these things clear at all imo. |
TripleSRankJan 16, 2016 10:55 AM
Jan 16, 2016 10:56 AM
#836
TripleSRank said: If that's the case, then, in episode 2: Where did the stone wall come from? It literally popped up out of nowhere, and there was no indication that some of the sand was transformed into it. Similarly, what was sacrificed to make objects move? If a certain amount of mass of one thing is required to that same amount of mass in another, shouldn't similar rules apply to energy/manipulation of objects? He takes particles from all over his surroundings and uses them to mould a single object. Doing something like that too much without adding your own raw material would ruin infrastructure. TripleSRank said: If that's the case, then, in episode 2: Also, how is Eric able to do this without a transmutation circle? At first it was explained as being due to his badge being some sort of amplifier, but then he proceeded to do the same thing without it. You'll understand soon. That's actually a big deal. |
gedataJan 16, 2016 10:59 AM
Jan 16, 2016 10:58 AM
#837
TripleSRank said: If that's the case, then, in episode 2: Where did the stone wall come from? It literally popped up out of nowhere, and there was no indication that some of the sand was transformed into it. Similarly, what was sacrificed to make objects move? If a certain amount of mass of one thing is required to that same amount of mass in another, shouldn't similar rules apply to energy/manipulation of objects? Also, how is Eric able to do this without a transmutation circle? At first it was explained as being due to his badge being some sort of amplifier, but then he proceeded to do the same thing without it. Stuff like this makes the alchemy seem very poorly fleshed out, to me. For coreography's sake, they're able to move and give momentum to the materials while the transmutation is occurring, I don't remember the details, but they can certainly make a stone wall in front of them by transforming the materials under them. Those nitpicky conversations aren't my thing, though. I thought it was explained well enough, I'm not someone who cares about the ins and out of a fictional world, unless they're directly relevant to characters and themes |
Lollo36Jan 16, 2016 11:01 AM
Jan 16, 2016 11:02 AM
#838
gedata said: TripleSRank said: If that's the case, then, in episode 2: Where did the stone wall come from? It literally popped up out of nowhere, and there was no indication that some of the sand was transformed into it. Similarly, what was sacrificed to make objects move? If a certain amount of mass of one thing is required to that same amount of mass in another, shouldn't similar rules apply to energy/manipulation of objects? He takes particles from all over his surroundings and uses them to mould a single object. Doing something like that too much without adding your own raw material would ruin infrastructure. Him being able to create statues that move on his own though? No idea. That there was enough dust in the surrounding air to create a stone wall that thick is a bit hard to swallow, but it's better than nothing. Maybe I should just assume it came from the sand and they just didn't show it? As for the statues, he didn't actually create them. They already existed; he just "animated" them so that they could move and attack like a living being. To me, this seems like a tremendous feat that would require something substantial, especially since alchemy in relation to life (and particularly human life) is implied to be harder to use effectively. gedata said: TripleSRank said: If that's the case, then, in episode 2: Also, how is Eric able to do this without a transmutation circle? At first it was explained as being due to his badge being some sort of amplifier, but then he proceeded to do the same thing without it. You'll understand soon. That's actually a big deal. Alright. |
TripleSRankJan 16, 2016 11:11 AM
Jan 16, 2016 11:06 AM
#839
Lollo36 said: TripleSRank said: If that's the case, then, in episode 2: Where did the stone wall come from? It literally popped up out of nowhere, and there was no indication that some of the sand was transformed into it. Similarly, what was sacrificed to make objects move? If a certain amount of mass of one thing is required to that same amount of mass in another, shouldn't similar rules apply to energy/manipulation of objects? Also, how is Eric able to do this without a transmutation circle? At first it was explained as being due to his badge being some sort of amplifier, but then he proceeded to do the same thing without it. Stuff like this makes the alchemy seem very poorly fleshed out, to me. For coreography's sake, they're able to move and give momentum to the materials while the transmutation is occurring, I don't remember the details, but they can certainly make a stone wall in front of them by transforming the materials under them. Those nitpicky conversations aren't my thing, though. I thought it was explained well enough, I'm not someone who cares about the ins and out of a fictional world, unless they're directly relevant to characters and themes When the story appears to take the way its abilities work seriously, then I take it seriously. I don't question the ridiculousness of the powers in OPM or why eating certain fruits makes you a superhuman in One Piece, but when I'm presented with rules such as in HxH or this, then I expect everything to be explained properly as it becomes relevant. |
Jan 16, 2016 11:10 AM
#840
mfw 700 posts backlog no Garakowa was hella weird, I guess it was alright but eh, poor execution overall, and too short. |
Jan 16, 2016 11:13 AM
#841
Jan 16, 2016 11:16 AM
#842
Jan 16, 2016 11:17 AM
#843
Lollo36 said: It was a Paulo movie on paper but it had a tad too many awkward moments and boring directing and not too fleshed out plot to be that great. :(Paulo27 said: Garakowa was hella weird, I guess it was alright but eh, poor execution overall, and too short. Uh, I was just thinking that it seemed like a very Paulo movie. I'll start watching it right now. Also, "madoka rip-off" bait. |
Jan 16, 2016 11:19 AM
#844
I do have to say that I prefer red over white of the little I've drunk. The Chianti I tried had a real depth of flavour and the aroma even stuck in your nose 0_0 |
Jan 16, 2016 11:37 AM
#845
I just love the way that Na'Vi clears corners. Really smart. |
Jan 16, 2016 11:38 AM
#846
Jan 16, 2016 11:39 AM
#847
cupc said: force buying like retardaswtf is Envyus even doing, they are getting absolutely rolled happy saving 24/7 without helping his team it's like envyus want to purposely handicap themselves by playing 4v5 with constant 3k money each round |
Jan 16, 2016 11:40 AM
#848
Zergneedsfood said: cupc said: force buying like retardaswtf is Envyus even doing, they are getting absolutely rolled happy saving 24/7 without helping his team it's like envyus want to purposely handicap themselves by playing 4v5 with constant 3k money each round But they can't win full buys either KennyS felt nonexistant with the AWP, they get picked one by one without any losses for NaVi lmao |
Jan 16, 2016 11:40 AM
#849
they're also going full tilt |
Jan 16, 2016 11:41 AM
#850
cupc said: yea I have no idea what's wrong. they're doing really sketch things like peeking when they don't need to, having poor static setupsZergneedsfood said: cupc said: wtf is Envyus even doing, they are getting absolutely rolled happy saving 24/7 without helping his team it's like envyus want to purposely handicap themselves by playing 4v5 with constant 3k money each round But they can't win full buys either KennyS felt nonexistant with the AWP, they get picked one by one without any losses for NaVi lmao the thing about envyus is they they don't really play train, and against a team like Na'Vi, they're just getting abused tactically you've seen Na'Vi go like....5 times to the B bombsite now and just literally run out and yolo kill everyone before the CTs rotate. envyus just haven't adapted at all. |
More topics from this board
» Anime Thought of The Day..? V.25: ded and forgottenBotato - May 8, 2022 |
34 |
by ReaperCreeper
»»
Apr 20, 8:08 PM |
|
» If you could get every regular in the club to watch one anime of your choosing, what would you pick and why?TripleSRank - Apr 8, 2017 |
45 |
by DreamingGhost
»»
Jun 2, 2023 5:02 AM |
|
Sticky: » [Possible Spoilers] Most Overrated/Underrated Anime V. 5 ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Ckan - Sep 19, 2014 |
3375 |
by DreamingGhost
»»
Jun 2, 2023 4:11 AM |
|
» Anime Thought of The Day..? V.24: ded but not forgotten ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )Paulo27 - Mar 10, 2018 |
9992 |
by Botato
»»
May 10, 2022 10:54 AM |
|
Sticky: » An Important Announcement To LurkersKokko - Mar 15, 2015 |
30 |
by LeonhartAugust
»»
Dec 27, 2018 8:16 PM |