New
Jun 4, 2017 10:16 AM
#301
Madness, the body does decide. If the body has XY Chromosomes, they're a guy, if the Body has XX, they're a woman. Basic Biology. |
Jun 4, 2017 11:47 AM
#302
Nyu said: Madness, the body does decide. If the body has XY Chromosomes, they're a guy, if the Body has XX, they're a woman. Basic Biology. Well, I was only interpretating their views. In MY view though, even if you were right, that would only be on a biological sense. I believe what people call gender identity does not have to do with, nor does oppose the idea of biological gender. For example, a trangender would be someone who's biological gender is male, but has the identity gender (the mind/inner gender) of a female, or vice-versa. And I don't think them identifying as something different then their biological gender is be just a delusion in their heads as we clearly see enough cases of people suffering from that 'mind vs body' contradiction. The way I see it, biological gender is/would be/could be a thing, and gender identity is another, and there's no need to choose only one or the other. Both can exist as their own thing and both could be acknowledged (perharps even officially by adding 'gender identity' to our IDs or something). For pratical use, we could address people using pronouns linked to their gender identity (much like what the LGBT wants) and then use their biological gender when dealing with certain medical/biological matters. |
HyperLJun 4, 2017 12:22 PM
You are not your body, you are your brain, the "self" that emerges from within it. |
Jun 4, 2017 11:54 AM
#303
Nyu said: Madness, the body does decide. If the body has XY Chromosomes, they're a guy, if the Body has XX, they're a woman. Basic Biology. Get your head out of your "basic biology" and read advanced biology already. Anyway, as a transhumanist, I do not care about your basic biology and other remnants of the past. We gotta go forward. |
Jun 4, 2017 11:57 AM
#304
True, I can only think of Shierke from Berserk, Motoko from GitS, Kanna from 20thCB, Seras from Hellsing Ultimate, Litner from Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann, Faye from Cowboy Bebop and there's probably more, but not enough |
Jun 4, 2017 12:21 PM
#305
flannan said: Nyu said: Madness, the body does decide. If the body has XY Chromosomes, they're a guy, if the Body has XX, they're a woman. Basic Biology. Get your head out of your "basic biology" and read advanced biology already. Anyway, as a transhumanist, I do not care about your basic biology and other remnants of the past. We gotta go forward. I'm curious about what you think of my idea though. Do you think gender identity can be it's own thing and can live in harmony with the notion of biological gender? Or do you think the inclusion of trangenders should also count as biological and completely update/substitute the current notion biological gender? In other words, do you think it should be like this? Biological gender = male/female Identity gender = male/female/<insert other possible options here> (or maybe just cisgender/transgender) Or like this? (Biological?/Only) Gender = male/female/<insert other possible options here> |
You are not your body, you are your brain, the "self" that emerges from within it. |
Jun 4, 2017 12:42 PM
#306
HyperL said: flannan said: Nyu said: Madness, the body does decide. If the body has XY Chromosomes, they're a guy, if the Body has XX, they're a woman. Basic Biology. Get your head out of your "basic biology" and read advanced biology already. Anyway, as a transhumanist, I do not care about your basic biology and other remnants of the past. We gotta go forward. I'm curious about what you think of my idea though. Do you think gender identity can be it's own thing and can live in harmony with the notion of biological gender? Or do you think the inclusion of trangenders should also count as biological and completely update/substitute the current notion biological gender? In other words, do you think it should be like this? Biological gender = male/female Identity gender = male/female/<insert other possible options here> (or maybe just cisgender/transgender) Or like this? (Biological?/Only) Gender = male/female/<insert other possible options here> I agree - there are many kinds of gender. While I consider gender identity to be the most important one, it does not mean a person's body or their avatar in virtual reality does not have gender. A person's behavior can also be stereotypically masculine or feminine. What I'm arguing here, is that all of these genders are not binary. Well, except for the VR avatar's gender - that one might be binary (but I've seen non-binary game characters too). A person might self-identify as futanari or as a genderless construct (which might or might not correspond to their birth circumstances), a person's body might be a complicated mess of conflicting hormones, multiple genotypes, surgical operations and viruses attempting to rewrite them, a real modern person's behavior usually combines both stereotypically masculine and feminine traits (for example, many modern men can cook and many modern women wear pants). |
Jun 4, 2017 1:15 PM
#307
>Complains about lack of respectable female protagonists >Mostly watches shounen shit and ecchi trash |
Nico- said: Conversations with people pinging/quoting me to argue about some old post I wrote years ago will not be entertained@Comic_Sans oh no y arnt ppl dieing i need more ppl dieing rly gud plot avansement jus liek tokyo ghoul if erbudy dies amirite |
Jun 4, 2017 11:53 PM
#308
HyperL said: Nyu said: Madness, the body does decide. If the body has XY Chromosomes, they're a guy, if the Body has XX, they're a woman. Basic Biology. Well, I was only interpretating their views. In MY view though, even if you were right, that would only be on a biological sense. I believe what people call gender identity does not have to do with, nor does oppose the idea of biological gender. For example, a trangender would be someone who's biological gender is male, but has the identity gender (the mind/inner gender) of a female, or vice-versa. And I don't think them identifying as something different then their biological gender is be just a delusion in their heads as we clearly see enough cases of people suffering from that 'mind vs body' contradiction. The way I see it, biological gender is/would be/could be a thing, and gender identity is another, and there's no need to choose only one or the other. Both can exist as their own thing and both could be acknowledged (perharps even officially by adding 'gender identity' to our IDs or something). For pratical use, we could address people using pronouns linked to their gender identity (much like what the LGBT wants) and then use their biological gender when dealing with certain medical/biological matters. There's only really 2 variants. Biological gender, which is normal and Transgender. Transgender is backed up by Science, because many sources have shown people having the opposite gender's brain patterns. However, Transgender should just be referred by their Gender, or supposed gender. None of this Cis-gender stuff, normal people don't need another classification. And I don't like that mindset whatsoever, just because some people aren't normal doesn't mean you have to make up for that, by forcing some new classification on people. Though Gender Identity, like Gender-Fluid is completely delusional. Its one thing to think you're another gender, it's completely another to make stuff up as you go along. The Idea of Gender Identity on ID? Is utterly ridiculous, if people want to play pretend, then so be it, but to force it on everyone else? Is madness. I've already studied Biology at College level, so you can keep making that point all day. And another thing, Basic Biology doesn't suddenly stop existing just because you ignore Biology. HyperL said: In other words, do you think it should be like this? Biological gender = male/female Identity gender = male/female/<insert other possible options here> (or maybe just cisgender/transgender) Or like this? (Biological?/Only) Gender = male/female/<insert other possible options here> Gender and Sex should be categorised like this. Sex: Male / Female (If it was a Medical form, then XXY should be listed.) Gender: Male / Female (There is no need to list Transgender, as they either associate as a male or female.) That's insane, a person is Either Intersex, or isn't. People can't assume to have what they don't. Ya can't just suddenly assume you're rich can you? No. Genderless construct, I can't stop laughing, that has gotta be the funniest gender outta the 30 made up genders. Are they an AI Construct? It's like people steal this stuff from Science Fiction, next people will be assuming they're Dragons. |
RuneRemJun 4, 2017 11:59 PM
Jun 5, 2017 12:13 AM
#309
Lmfao @ katniss and divergent girl being your counter example Anime has pretty much the best representation on that aspect compared to most mediums tbh, just look beyond stupid harem anime that's aimed at horny boys anyway. Miyazaki alone proves you wrong, like all of his movies except 4 of them has female protagonists. Actually just watch more shojo/josei |
Jun 5, 2017 12:14 AM
#310
Actually, i know exactly what you mean and i also hate that there are very little. The ONE that i can stand behind no matter what is the previous seasons YOUJO SENKI. I recommended it to the fullest to you and promise you will not be disappointed. Legit the best female MC I've ever witnessed in anime and I want a 2nd season for it so bad. |
I have small reviews for almost ALL anime I've seen. Unlike any regular MAL page you've seen. Ever wondering what I've watched and what I think about it? Check my List out below! https://myanimelist.net/animelist/Iam_Jermaine |
Jun 5, 2017 12:20 AM
#311
If you really think this is true then you need to watch more anime. |
Jun 5, 2017 1:26 AM
#312
Nyu said: That's insane, a person is Either Intersex, or isn't. People can't assume to have what they don't. Ya can't just suddenly assume you're rich can you? No. Genderless construct, I can't stop laughing, that has gotta be the funniest gender outta the 30 made up genders. Are they an AI Construct? It's like people steal this stuff from Science Fiction, next people will be assuming they're Dragons. Welcome to the 21st century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otherkin The world is crazy, and you just have to accept it. |
Jun 5, 2017 5:21 AM
#313
flannan said: Nyu said: That's insane, a person is Either Intersex, or isn't. People can't assume to have what they don't. Ya can't just suddenly assume you're rich can you? No. Genderless construct, I can't stop laughing, that has gotta be the funniest gender outta the 30 made up genders. Are they an AI Construct? It's like people steal this stuff from Science Fiction, next people will be assuming they're Dragons. Welcome to the 21st century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otherkin The world is crazy, and you just have to accept it. Fortunately, I don't have to accept it, and all other rational people will resist this nonsense. |
Jun 5, 2017 5:28 AM
#314
Nyu said: flannan said: Nyu said: That's insane, a person is Either Intersex, or isn't. People can't assume to have what they don't. Ya can't just suddenly assume you're rich can you? No. Genderless construct, I can't stop laughing, that has gotta be the funniest gender outta the 30 made up genders. Are they an AI Construct? It's like people steal this stuff from Science Fiction, next people will be assuming they're Dragons. Welcome to the 21st century. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otherkin The world is crazy, and you just have to accept it. Fortunately, I don't have to accept it, and all other rational people will resist this nonsense. If you're a rational person, why are you watching anime? (Checks out profile) oh, you aren't watching anime. Go away. Anyway, I would not call you a rational person if you aren't looking into the future and making allowances for sci-fi concepts like AI. I would rather call you a luddite. |
Jun 5, 2017 11:03 AM
#315
HyperL said: TheBrainintheJar said: HyperL said: @TheBrainintheJar Let me try to explain gender identity for you. You know those movies where a man and a woman switch bodies? Imagine if happened to you, how would it feel? Well, for the sake of the explanation, let me tell you how would you feel: Firstly, your mind wouldn't change a bit. Your instincts and emotions would still be the same, you would still be attracted to woman (at least I assume you are to begin with) and most importantly you would still feel like and perceive things as (have the perspective of) a man even though you have the looks and reproductive organs of a woman. Secondly, because you still feel like and perceive things as a man, there's a possibility that you would feel some sort of disconnection or dissonance to your current body, as if it belonged in a different body, a male one. And that is basically what a transgender is (or at least my interpretation of it. But that's what I got from reading and hearing about the subject), but without the body swap stuff and possibly from the very start of their lives. They have the mind state, perspective and sense of self pertencing to a gender within a body (with reproductive organs) of the opposite gender. Thus gender identity is, in a way, the gender of the mind, though the LGBT community and its supporters considers it the ideal view of gender and fight so that being trangender can be viewed as normal and to have them be addressed for what they consider themselves. I truly wonder what would happen if I switched bodies. See, I consider my body nothing more than some matter that can movie on its own. Society prescribes it meaning. I don't. flannan said: TheBrainintheJar said: flannan said: TheBrainintheJar said: flannan said: TheBrainintheJar said: flannan said: TheBrainintheJar said: flannan said: TheBrainintheJar said: flannan said: @TheBrainintheJar can you re-state what exactly are you trying to argue here? It kind of got lost in the quote towers, and I have good enough opinion of you to actually discuss this stuff. - Gender = Gender roles, when I currently use it - Gender roles are a solution to an is-ought problem: IS: The average man is stronger than the average woman Therefore, OUGHT: Only men should so physical labour - My objection: It does not follow. The IS doesn't show all men are stronger than all women. Beyond that, what's important for physical labor is only strength, regardless of your biological sex. - Therefore, these gender roles are utterly pointless. Regardless of your biological sex, you decide what to do with your body. The way I see this discussion, Onyx claims that there are exactly two sexes/genders (he uses the words interchangeably), and each of them is hard-wired with major parts of gender roles. That is, not only men are stronger than woman, they are pre-programmed to want to do physical labor. Any man that refuses to do physical labor (for example because he is lazy like Houtarou Oreki from Hyouka) is unrealistic. Other people in the discussion, in particular me and @jal90, find this claim both stupid and badly outdated. Find the claim I put forward, or Onyx's? Onyx's claim. TheBrainintheJar said: As for my claim, I come from the pessimist bent. I already look down on any big social narratives. Nationality, ethnicity, race, and gender are all silly groups we box ourselves in that don't help us. So I deliberately reduce sex to a few body parts and strip it of its meaning. Society can give it meaning all it wants but it doesn't prove it has meaning. To @jal90 , biological component of sex is not reducible to "a few body parts", since, as the article he has linked demonstrates, it is affected by interplay of a lot of factors that don't necessarily result in a classic "male" or "female" human. In practice, "gender roles" can be safely ignored (you might have to nuke a few countries who disagree, but they always needed nuking), but "gender identity" is not. Having a gender identity that is not in line with one's physical body can give such "transsexual" people a lot of suffering. What is 'gender identity'? 'Gender identity' means the gender that the owner of the identity considers oneself to belong to. This can be pretty complicated (especially for intersex individuals who are in harmony with their bodies), but "attack helicopter" probably does not belong here - it must be somewhere near "therian" people. (Therians identify with animals) TheBrainintheJar said: How come biological component of sex isn't reducible? Why can't I reduce it to penis-and-vagina? You are immediately faced with the fact at least some results in that article seem to be classic futanari, with both a penis and a vagina. Oh, and genetics-first people will disagree with you a lot. Merely talking about 'what you feel you belong to' doesn't explain gender identity. What are the traits? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_identity "Gender identity is one's personal experience of one's own gender". What kind of "traits" are you looking for? Gender identity is a state of mind, so you will not be able to observe it directly with modern technology. TheBrainintheJar said: Intersex are mutations, abnormalities. They don't exist in significant amount so I'll throw the whole binary out. You keep saying this, but it means "I want to oppress millions of people". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex#Population_figures "According to Blackless, Fausto-Sterling et al., 1.7 percent of human births are intersex, including variations that may not become apparent until, for example, puberty, or until attempting to conceive." That's about the same order of magnitude as homosexuals. This doesn't mean I want to oppress people. Please, no mind-rape, telling people "I know what you REALLY think!". This time of technique get us nowhere. When I say you're a mutation or an abnormality, I do not say you don't exist, but that you don't overthrow a fact. I'll bring it close to my home. I'm suicidal and believe dying is a right, yet I readily agree the desire to live is hard-wired in us. Just because a few of us want to die doesn't mean the whole pattern is thrown off. I do assume you do not want to oppress people. But the way you're saying it does say the opposite. I wanted to highlight that. One common way of oppressing a class of people is assuming they do not exist, and making policy decisions without taking them into account. To use your example: sure, desire to live is hard-wired into people. That doesn't mean suicides do not exist, and every case of suicide should be considered a very well concealed murder, and investigated until the police finds somebody (probably innocent) to put into jail. TheBrainintheJar said: I still don't get 'gender identity'. I'm a man only because I have a penis. I don't define myself as 'genderqueer' although I don't fit the 'man' template, only because I doubt the genderqueers would accept me among them. Let me put it in anime terms. Major Motoko Kusanagi, MC of GitS, might not be a stereotypical woman (she is a badass spec ops leader), but she consistently chooses feminine cyborg bodies, even if it is not the best choice. Because she self-identifies as female (probably because she was born female). Hence, we can say that her gender identity is female. Even though she has an uber-masculine gender role. Sorry I could not find a good example among your watched anime. It seems that "Ore, Twintail ni Narimasu" is the only one that can be used to explore this question (there are also Ergo Proxy and a few other anime that might be relevant but I don't know well enough). Another way of oppressing people is classifying them as dangerous. So I'd be wary of pointing the finger and calling someone a racist or a transphobic. Such name-calling can only ruin the discussion, not support it. I will not cower just because someone called me something nasty. A problem here is that I don't consider our bodies to be meaningful except as a bunch of matter we control. See above. Of course I don't feel connected to my body. I'm stuck with it, I was cursed with it and I live with it. The only reason I'd prefer a woman's body is because they do better socially than men. Well that's a bit close the views of LGBT. In other words, if our bodies are only matter, than they should have the right to consider themselves whatever they want, be it male, female or attack helicopter (this last one is a joke). The body doesn't decide what they are, the mind and the self does. The difference is that the body DOES matter to them in some way, otherwise some of them wouldn't opt to undergo full sex change operations, probably to fully be confortable with themselves (and to experience sex the way they desire XD). I don't like the attack helicopter meme, myself. I may disagree about the whole gender thing, but respecting those who disagree is the first step towards productive discourse. Anyway, the purpose of classifying matter is so I'll know what I'm up against. If I classify your body as 'male', I know you have a penis. Sexually, it helps me understand what to expect and what kind of things we can do. The body does matter, but in the 'big identity' thing. There is little meaning to it besides reproduction, no matter how many social narratives we rape our minds with. 'Male' and 'female' describe the matter you're made of, not who you are. 'Who you are', your soul (In the Aristotlian sense) cannot be captured in a single word. |
WEAPONS - My blog, for reviews of music, anime, books, and other things |
Jun 5, 2017 11:11 AM
#316
Most actually good anime has good female charas. |
Jun 5, 2017 3:49 PM
#317
I sort of like Jeanne from Shingeki not Bahamut (and the sequel) so far. But yes in general most girls, boys, everything between and anime in general is probably garbage |
"This emotion is mine alone. It is for Madoka alone." - Homura or how I would descripe Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica. |
Jun 6, 2017 7:59 PM
#318
Yona from Akatsuki no Yona is a great female character. Goes from whiny character that doesn't really care about anything to a pretty cool character Kokoro Connect has two female characters that I really enjoyed (one more then the other, but both great). Rem and Emilia from Re Zero: Starting Life in Another World are respectable female characters. Sango from Inuyasha is pretty cool. Mei from Another is interesting/different. Akane from Psycho-Pass was also nice. Senki Zesshou Symphogear's main cast are females; they're pretty interesting with different personailties. (Not one of my favorite anime, but it's still fun to watch). Mahou Shoujo Madoka Magica's female characters were also interesting Same with the female characters from Gakkou-Gurashi (Do not read the genres or summary from this one, spoilers everywhere). And probably more that I'm just not thinking about at the moment. There are great female characters, just like male's females have different unique personalities. Everyone's different. Edit: Certain female characters from ef; a tale of memories and ef; a tale of melodies were great. (Watch in that order). Edit II: Also Your Lie in April had some good female characters as well. Edit III: I liked the female characters from Flip Flappers as well as Golden Time. Edit: Also Faye from Cowboy Bebop; how could I have forgotten her? |
Book_LoverJun 6, 2017 8:16 PM
Jun 6, 2017 8:00 PM
#319
gezz what anime have you been watching? |
"among monsters and humans, there are only two types. Those who undergo suffering and spread it to others. And those who undergo suffering and avoid giving it to others." -Alice “Beauty is no quality in things themselves: It exists merely in the mind which contemplates them; and each mind perceives a different beauty.” David Hume “Evil is created when someone gives up on someone else. It appears when everyone gives up on someone as a lost cause and removes their path to salvation. Once they are cut off from everyone else, they become evil.” -Othinus |
Jul 3, 2017 10:42 PM
#320
there is a general lack of likeable women in anime/manga genre. if writers do put a respectable female character, she is edited out, her time is shortened, or she is changed. eg. misora naomi in death note. The women of anime are weak, shallow, stupid, annoying, useless, male-dependent, rag dolls, perverse, disgusting,........ most, anime anyway..... shoujo, josei women are dislikeable, despicable for different reasons: loud, obnoxious, dumb, boring, bland, abusive, rude, irritating, fanatical, narrow minded, rigid, childish..... Tarextherex said: shoujo, josei women are dislikeable, despicable for different reasons:Actually just watch more shojo/josei loud, obnoxious, dumb, boring, bland, abusive, rude, irritating, fanatical, narrow minded, rigid, childish..... ps- i am a girl. |
PeachesRoseJul 3, 2017 11:22 PM
Jul 3, 2017 11:06 PM
#321
Jul 3, 2017 11:58 PM
#322
PeachesRose said: Tarextherex said: shoujo, josei women are dislikeable, despicable for different reasons:Actually just watch more shojo/josei loud, obnoxious, dumb, boring, bland, abusive, rude, irritating, fanatical, narrow minded, rigid, childish..... ps- i am a girl. First off if your main character criticisms are about being likeable or not, you have a serious lack of empathy and you need to chill out from reacting so strongly to fictional characters Second, the OP barely saw any anime that were actually aimed towards women/girls, getting into those would be a good place to start. If the show has bad/stereotypical characters, that's the show's problem, just like bad shonen shows portray male characters terribly. Just watch good stuff like Nana |
Jul 4, 2017 1:28 AM
#323
Tarextherex said: no thanks. Nana doesn't appeal to me.PeachesRose said: Tarextherex said: Actually just watch more shojo/josei loud, obnoxious, dumb, boring, bland, abusive, rude, irritating, fanatical, narrow minded, rigid, childish..... ps- i am a girl. First off if your main character criticisms are about being likeable or not, you have a serious lack of empathy and you need to chill out from reacting so strongly to fictional characters Second, the OP barely saw any anime that were actually aimed towards women/girls, getting into those would be a good place to start. If the show has bad/stereotypical characters, that's the show's problem, just like bad shonen shows portray male characters terribly. Just watch good stuff like Nana Misaki from maid sama, hikari from special a, haruhi from Ouran,how r they likable. They are all the things I listed. Look I don't wanna argue. I just gave my two cents and I personally am not able to like or respect female characters in anime/ manga, generally. |
Jul 11, 2017 6:30 AM
#324
Pyxus said: True, I can only think of Shierke from Berserk, Motoko from GitS, Kanna from 20thCB, Seras from Hellsing Ultimate, Litner from Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann, Faye from Cowboy Bebop and there's probably more, but not enough Some of female you mention is Female Co-Protagonist . OP said Female Protagonist |
Jul 12, 2017 12:54 AM
#325
Saintrider891 said: Pyxus said: True, I can only think of Shierke from Berserk, Motoko from GitS, Kanna from 20thCB, Seras from Hellsing Ultimate, Litner from Tengen Toppa Gurren Lagann, Faye from Cowboy Bebop and there's probably more, but not enough Some of female you mention is Female Co-Protagonist . OP said Female Protagonist The lack of female protagonists is probably because there aren't a lot of male directors/main scriptwriters. So women step up and go get it. |
WEAPONS - My blog, for reviews of music, anime, books, and other things |
Jul 12, 2017 1:18 AM
#326
From my top 5 anime, 3 have really respectable female leads: Erin from Kemono no Souja Erin, Youko from Twelve Kingdoms and Ryouko from Zegapain. From my rated 8 or above shows, you can also find them in the characters of: Nausicaä from Kaze no Tani no Nausicaä, Balsa from Seirei no Moribito, Holo from Ookami to Koushinryou, Alicia from Senjou no Valkyria, Saki from Shinsekai yori, Eureka from Eureka Seven, Nodame from Nodame Cantabile, Togame from Katanagatari, Makise from Steins;Gate, Hakaze from Zetsuen no Tempest, Kaede from Bakemono no Ko. On a side note, Yona from Akatsuki no Yona definitely doesn't represent a respectable and strong female character. Actually, I would say she is the opposite of it. To me, this show was just a "bait", since in two cours she never showed any kind of true strength. No, "bullshit eyes" did not convince me. Well, this is my opinion at least. |
Aug 19, 2017 1:56 PM
#327
Less archetypal female characters, who aren't respectable and more Caska? Sounds paradoxic. |
Aug 19, 2017 5:20 PM
#328
LucisCaelum said: Less archetypal female characters, who aren't respectable and more Caska? Sounds paradoxic. erm pls explain, I am not well known with Berserk enough yet. |
Aug 19, 2017 5:30 PM
#329
OP, there is a simple solution for your problem: Stop watching anime and asking japan to pander to Tumblr. Also, Katniss is a shitty written Mary Sue character. PS: like people before me said, THERE ARE female characters like that already, you just ignored them. |
removed-userAug 19, 2017 5:34 PM
Aug 19, 2017 5:30 PM
#330
My thoughts exactly OP. It's so rare to come across a female character I can actually stand in anime. Most of them are only there to be otaku's waifus and boring love interests. Not that there's anything wrong with fan service or porn or anything (I'm pretty pro porn and sexual liberation), but even in shows that aren't ecchi and are supposed to be taken seriously women end up like this. There are many exceptions, of course! If you look for it, you can find well-written women. Ghibli films come to mind, I feel like the Attack on Titan ladies avoid sexualization and are actually given character, My Hero Academia has some cool female characters, and many more. I hope anime starts to move towards more fleshed out girls that aren't just there to fap to/smooch the protagonist when he saves the day... |
☆ My Anime Challenges ☆ My List ☆ |
Aug 19, 2017 5:33 PM
#331
>Katniss Everdeen Literally no better than your average shonen protagonist |
Aug 19, 2017 6:06 PM
#332
What about the entire mahou shoujo genre? |
Aug 19, 2017 6:14 PM
#333
Your Name, Spirited Away, Mononoke Hime, Monogatari Series, Howl's Moving Castle, and Violet Evergarden are on the Top 50 and have female main characters that aren't just some archetype. What more do you want? Half of the Top 50 to have female leads? Not gonna happen. |
Aug 19, 2017 6:26 PM
#334
Most of the things you watch are aimed at young boys, that's why all characters feel this way. Not calling nekketsu a bad genre, but i personally dislike it and so avoid. I'm watching boku no hero for the saking of watching since it's pretty boring... The point is, if it bothers you that much why don't you try others genres? |
Aug 19, 2017 6:42 PM
#335
Like others said there's plenty of respectable and well written heroines in anime. I'll give my own examples. Misty from Pokémon The heroines from Digimon Adventure 01 and 02. Ryuko Matoi from Kill La Kill Motoko Kusanagi from Ghost in the Shell Winry,Hawkeye and the other heroines from Full Metal Alchemist and FMA Brotherhood Kagome from Inuyasha Akane from Ranma 1/2 The Studio Ghibli heroines Just to name a few so there's really not a lot of lack of them. Also am I the only one here who feels like there's a huge level of hypocrisy when it comes to how a female character ought to look,act and do in order to be respectable? Like most people demand for female characters to have larger and meaningful roles with more character depth and diversity to them yet those same people also say that unless that female character is not sexualized,not feminine,and not "soft" They cannot be taken seriously and respected. I know I'm using the more extreme examples here but still the fact that female characters of ANY medium let alone anime are starting to be judged harshly by what type of character they are even if that character is extremely well written regardless of what type of character she is and/or how she looks just comes across as hypocritical because you're still restricting what kind of female character you're trying to create just in a different fashion. Not to mention it's extremely insulting to some real life women who are more interested in being feminine or looking a little sexy because then they're made to look like fools or objects which is ironic given the whole point of wanting more strong female characters is to not label them in insulting tropes or group. This isn't meant to be a jab at the original poster. It's just something I've wanted to say for some time. |
kaijuguy19Aug 19, 2017 6:47 PM
Aug 20, 2017 4:21 AM
#336
Bourmegar said: LucisCaelum said: Less archetypal female characters, who aren't respectable and more Caska? Sounds paradoxic. erm pls explain, I am not well known with Berserk enough yet. She is archetypal character. Stronk girl. Maybe even tsundere, don't remember it that well. "Needs to be protected". Also, she did close to zero for plot. Following one dude (Who only used her for his own personal gain) is pretty much everything she does and just killed one guy of importance iirc. Oh, and every random guy wants to rape her (Someone even raped her). Elizabeth (of Seven Deadly Sins) did WAY more, love is not THAT superficial, bacause... they will explore it more and nobody wants to rape her. Both of them are used for fanservice, so yeah... it sounds paradoxic. And I think, there is a huge lack of fine characters in general. Thats normal for any medium of story-telling, I guess. |
Aug 20, 2017 11:36 AM
#337
kaijuguy19 said: Also am I the only one here who feels like there's a huge level of hypocrisy when it comes to how a female character ought to look,act and do in order to be respectable? Like most people demand for female characters to have larger and meaningful roles with more character depth and diversity to them yet those same people also say that unless that female character is not sexualized,not feminine,and not "soft" They cannot be taken seriously and respected. I know I'm using the more extreme examples here but still the fact that female characters of ANY medium let alone anime are starting to be judged harshly by what type of character they are even if that character is extremely well written regardless of what type of character she is and/or how she looks just comes across as hypocritical because you're still restricting what kind of female character you're trying to create just in a different fashion. Not to mention it's extremely insulting to some real life women who are more interested in being feminine or looking a little sexy because then they're made to look like fools or objects which is ironic given the whole point of wanting more strong female characters is to not label them in insulting tropes or group. Yes, there is a lot of problems with the premise of this discussion. And that really prevents discussing the real problems. Like female characters often not actually having a role in the plot corresponding to their ability and screentime. Like, okay, the MC's girlfriend is that awesome fiery swordswoman with good grades who is obviously meant to be a man's dream. Why aren't we see her actually being useful in battle or in investigation? |
Aug 20, 2017 11:44 AM
#338
Wintovisky said: On a side note, Yona from Akatsuki no Yona definitely doesn't represent a respectable and strong female character. Actually, I would say she is the opposite of it. To me, this show was just a "bait", since in two cours she never showed any kind of true strength. No, "bullshit eyes" did not convince me. Well, this is my opinion at least. +1. I'm certainly glad I didn't bite its bait. |
Aug 20, 2017 12:01 PM
#340
I believe it is because the lack of source material. I think its not easy to create a story for such circumstance as OP wants. Then i believe there are many sufficient characters already and most of them has been listed. |
Life isn't as fun and easy as anime. Watch anime to bring that fun!! |
Aug 20, 2017 12:31 PM
#341
It honestly depends on the genre and the publishers of the source material (like what studio, what writer, what mangaka or author). Many will stoop to lowest common denominator as many outlets of entertainment tend to do, and shitty fanservice and terribly written, 1-dimensional female characters are one of those things. Unfortunately some creators still believe that anime/manga is a male-dominated medium despite clear as day evidence that there are female fans in equal measure. Sometimes you gotta find the hidden gems that either subvert, reject or openly challenge these notions because otherwise you will be disappointed in most things u see (that goes for outside of anime too). What you mentioned is a huge problem in shonen anime/manga, so if that's what you happen to be watching for the most part, try a different genre, or if u really like shonen anime, ask around for certain titles that are exceptions to this norm (like Soul Eater, FMA, Attack on Titan, Gintama, and even Yu Yu Hakusho) |
Aug 20, 2017 12:39 PM
#342
Asuna is literally the definition of tsundere |
Aug 20, 2017 12:40 PM
#343
Your literally watching the wrong anime if you think all female protagonists are archetypes. wait this threa looks familiar... wait a second what the heck?! hazerddex said: gezz what anime have you been watching? |
"among monsters and humans, there are only two types. Those who undergo suffering and spread it to others. And those who undergo suffering and avoid giving it to others." -Alice “Beauty is no quality in things themselves: It exists merely in the mind which contemplates them; and each mind perceives a different beauty.” David Hume “Evil is created when someone gives up on someone else. It appears when everyone gives up on someone as a lost cause and removes their path to salvation. Once they are cut off from everyone else, they become evil.” -Othinus |
Aug 20, 2017 1:09 PM
#344
how dare men use the power of animation to express their fantasies about women this isn't real.. stop giving fictional characters the same standards that only real people should have why is it that people can fantasize in their heads all day about unrealistic portrayals of even real people, but the instant its put into media (especially drawings) then its a problem? these anime characters people like to complain "aren't realistic enough" or w/e aren't supposed to be. they're supposed to be perfect.. perfect does not exist irl, so it HAS TO exist in fiction, and you're basically saying that perfection isn't respectable OP, don't you dare tell me your fantasies fall into even your own definition of "respectable", so why should someone else's???? this is basically some lowkey feminist bullshit.. plz go somewhere with that kaijuguy19 said: Also am I the only one here who feels like there's a huge level of hypocrisy when it comes to how a female character ought to look,act and do in order to be respectable? Like most people demand for female characters to have larger and meaningful roles with more character depth and diversity to them yet those same people also say that unless that female character is not sexualized,not feminine,and not "soft" They cannot be taken seriously and respected. I know I'm using the more extreme examples here but still the fact that female characters of ANY medium let alone anime are starting to be judged harshly by what type of character they are even if that character is extremely well written regardless of what type of character she is and/or how she looks just comes across as hypocritical because you're still restricting what kind of female character you're trying to create just in a different fashion. Not to mention it's extremely insulting to some real life women who are more interested in being feminine or looking a little sexy because then they're made to look like fools or objects which is ironic given the whole point of wanting more strong female characters is to not label them in insulting tropes or group. This isn't meant to be a jab at the original poster. It's just something I've wanted to say for some time. i've mentioned before the whole "why does this need big boobs?" "big boobs aren't necessary" "big boobs aren't realistic" complaints i see from people.. its fucking ridiculous.. i can't imagine how it must be to grow up a woman who takes pride in being lucky enough to develop naturally big jiggly tits only to see people treat it as though she downloaded some kind of cheat code offline or something big boobs are a natural part of the female body that evolved to attract men to mate with them, not some anime invention as people like to act so as you just said.. what about all the woman who enjoy showing off their sex appeal? anime has big boobs because big boobs are super attractive and many women have them.. and japan LOVES to show that off.. now if people want to whine about "unrealistic", well give us a world where no woman has huge boobs |
EcchiGodMamsterAug 20, 2017 1:34 PM
Aug 20, 2017 2:23 PM
#345
Kenna_Pyralis said: There is a HUGE amount of female characters who are just archetypes (anything that ends in "dere" these days), Moe blobs, cute for the sake of being cute, very generic, bland, needs to be "protected" and only there for fan service induced cancer instead of actual respectable mentally strong/have their own ideals which isn't something like "Kirito-sama!". (btw the list goes on) basically anything otaku bait. I am no feminist by today's definition but can we have someone like Shirayuki(snow white with red hair), Caska during gold age arc(berserk) or in non-animemovie some like Katniss Everdeen(from hunger games) or Beatrice Prior(from divergant). It really saddens me when the top 50 most popular anime on MAL does not have a single main female lead that isn't otaku bait, bland love interest, female archetype or just a fanservice female model(I challenge you on that btw). even though its not in the top 50 most popular look at seven deadly sins as an example. Elizabeth is a bland fan service model who pretends to have her own ideals but in reality gathering the sins is an excuse to be with meliodas-sama(at least she does not take the goal seriously imo) and a 1 dimensional love interest. nothing respectable in the least. the same with diane "Meliodas-sama" and fanservice model love interest with no real ideals of her own. What I am trying to say is that I can like these characters but I cannot respect these characters. Is there any prevalent respectable female characters in anime with their own ideals and why is this a very unpopular trend in anime fans? Stop watching ecchie harem anime if you don't want to see useless girls doing nothing but seducing the main character. |
Aug 20, 2017 2:27 PM
#346
You seriously need more Kara no Kyoukai in you life sir. Shiki is love, Shiki is so badass, she is more manly than me. Shiki will kick yo ass. Also, madoka Magica and Ghibli movies (goddamnit Nausicaa made me cry like a little bitch). |
Aug 20, 2017 2:33 PM
#347
HyperL said: Nyu said: Madness, the body does decide. If the body has XY Chromosomes, they're a guy, if the Body has XX, they're a woman. Basic Biology. Well, I was only interpretating their views. In MY view though, even if you were right, that would only be on a biological sense. I believe what people call gender identity does not have to do with, nor does oppose the idea of biological gender. For example, a trangender would be someone who's biological gender is male, but has the identity gender (the mind/inner gender) of a female, or vice-versa. And I don't think them identifying as something different then their biological gender is be just a delusion in their heads as we clearly see enough cases of people suffering from that 'mind vs body' contradiction. The way I see it, biological gender is/would be/could be a thing, and gender identity is another, and there's no need to choose only one or the other. Both can exist as their own thing and both could be acknowledged (perharps even officially by adding 'gender identity' to our IDs or something). For pratical use, we could address people using pronouns linked to their gender identity (much like what the LGBT wants) and then use their biological gender when dealing with certain medical/biological matters. You guys know that the body has hormones that make you atracted to other humans and that female hormones are different from male hormones and that influences sexual orientation... right? So if you were to swap bodied with an heterosexual woman, with time you might start to feel atracted to men too. Your sexual orientation wouldnt necesarily change, but that also depends on yourself. I can easily see myself feeling atracted to men if i was a woman, even tho im an heterosexual man. |
Aug 20, 2017 2:42 PM
#348
Yes there are very few but only those which are well made if u count all the anime including the genres boys don't watch then there is no lack at all If u count future diary madoka magical and kakegurui these are enough and I could go on but then it would be an essay not a post Hope this helps |
Aug 20, 2017 2:43 PM
#349
Yes there are very few but only those which are well made if u count all the anime including the genres boys don't watch then there is no lack at all If u count future diary madoka magical and kakegurui these are enough and I could go on but then it would be an essay not a post Hope this helps |
Aug 20, 2017 2:44 PM
#350
Yes there are very few but only those which are well made if u count all the anime including the genres boys don't watch then there is no lack at all If u count future diary madoka magical and kakegurui these are enough and I could go on but then it would be an essay not a post Hope this helps |
More topics from this board
» ⌛ Best Girls of the Past ErasShizuna - 1 hour ago |
25 |
by Nefregar
»»
43 seconds ago |
|
» Worst anime openingsRetroCagliostro - Oct 5 |
26 |
by ryan77999
»»
4 minutes ago |
|
» Waifu War V5 (Anniversary-Edition!) (Round 1) ( 1 2 3 4 5 ... Last Page )TheMinkalex - Sep 28 |
293 |
by IpreferEcchi
»»
5 minutes ago |
|
» Self insertionBirdyTheMighty - Yesterday |
21 |
by Flick_on
»»
7 minutes ago |
|
» What would you like to see in isekai?Absurdo_N - 7 hours ago |
38 |
by Wolfyrinn
»»
9 minutes ago |