GratefulEternity said:Lots of nuclear takes in this thread.
The answer is clearly yes, but whether you think its problematic or not, or if it does it too much, or if you think it drags the show down is up to you and your judgment of it.
My Hero gets singled out for it a lot, and I think there are anime that are way worse offenders than it, but I still think its a valid criticism. Part of why it gets singled out is that it came out in a time where people are more socially aware of these things, part of it is also because its so popular.
Well put and I agree...in part.
GratefulEternity said: (...)But I think its problematic for three big reasons. First, female characters are the most sexualized in the show, but also have the least amount of importance in the show. All of them play backburner to their male counterparts, except for a few sparing moments here and there. It makes them feel like they are just eye candy.
Second, they are really young, even relative to a lot of other anime. Characters in MHA are 14-15, where as in something like Fairy Tail, which sexualizes its characters a lot, the characters are mostly 17-18.
Hmmm...Kinda sorta.
The females are, indeed, "backburner" characters (so far). However, so are most of the male charters. While the focus of the show happens to revolve around the students of class 1A, the class as a whole are not the show's main characters. Anyone that isn't a main charter is a support character. Support characters are there to help round out the story, ground the main character(s), provide comic relief, eye candy, levity, and motivate/die.
Big thing that a lot of people seem to gloss over is that MHA, as are many other, is a Shounen. Shounen are specifically aimed at 12-18 year old males, staring males, usually about fighting and teamwork. It makes sense that the characters are in the age group that the target audience is in and with character designs appealing to that audience. Those outside of the target demographic that complain about not liking it are like people that say Gerber isn't seasoned well enough and Teletubbies doesn't have enough conflict or character growth.
GratefulEternity said:(...)Third is kinda anime exclusive but its also kinda makes it worse. A lot of the female characters have been made thinner/bustier relative to the manga. The cheerleading scene in season 2 shows this off. This kinda just calls attention to it, but also look at a character like Fatgum vs Momo. Both use their body fat in their powers, but Momo is a skinny and Fatgum is built like a cartoon sumo wrestler.
Perceptive, but easily explained. Consider that manga aren't usually developed by a bustling studio of artists like anime. Generally speaking, there is the creator/artist and maybe a couple assistants that mostly add backgrounds, lettering, and preform clean-up. Also, a lot of manga are published by chapter, weekly, in digest magazines, so they have a high production output and tight deadlines. Curves are more difficult to draw, keep within panel ratios, and keep consistent than straight(er) lines. This is why, in most manga (unless in main focus), most female characters appear flatter than in anime...its just easier to draw.
In regards to the Momo/Fatgum comparison- Fatgum, as per the artist's own words, is a joke character added to keep his mood up while drawing. That's why his design is so simplistic and goofy. Though, digging deeper, it could be rationalized that while both character's quirks use their fat...they do so very differently.
Momo actively converts her fat into objects of her choosing and has to remove them from her body. So a somewhat reveling costume design is warranted. True that she could benefit from being a larger woman, but women (generally) store fat differently, and with her frequent use of her quirk...the fat wouldn't remain in her body. Thus she would practically maintain a body shape of thick/plus. In darker thoughts, she could easily fall into a weird form of bulimia where she binge eats then just rips the fat from her body.
Fatgum's quirk allows him to envelop objets/people into his fat folds (essentially) and absorb/disperse kinetic energy. The larger/fatter he is, the more effective his abilities. He doesn't need skin exposure, just a fabric that is stretchy. I'd guess that he could do the job naked, but the suit may help with slashing/cutting damage and ...no.
GratefulEternity said:I personally think that the amount of heat MHA gets for this is a bit much, but its deff a valid criticism and if someone doesn't like it because of the sexualization of its characters, then I think that's fair.
SoldierDream said it.
SoldierDream said: No. There's a big difference between what's truly sexual and what's only sexy/sensual. Shows like MHA sensualize some of its characters, not sexualize them.
The show does have sensual character designs and moments, but not neccessarly sexual.
Mineta sexualizes almost everything, that's why he's shunned/disliked/gross. |