New
Dec 2, 2014 11:39 PM
#101
FloatingList said: Oh YE4H!!!! I'M OBSESSED WITH HIGHSCHOOL GIRLS FROM MA FAVOURITE ANIMU!! IT'Z DA BEST ANIMU EV4R!!!! KIRISAKI CHITOGE ==> BEST GIRL ONODERA KOSAKI ==> BEST WAIFU ... Okay, it's disgusting. So no, OP. As for me, I'm a civilized university student that happens to have an interest to anime and manga as a medium to art and entertainment. Nothing beyond that. And I believe MAL community is much better than "obsessed over loli and highschool girls". or is it? Someone give this man a medal. |
[b]“To be honest, as this world goes, is to be one man picked out of ten thousand.” - Hamlet [/b] |
Dec 3, 2014 12:06 AM
#102
Do I find anime women attractive? Indeed. And sometimes guys. Tbh, what's honestly the difference between them in anime? Girls are drawn with longer eyelashes. That's pretty much it. I'm not really obsessive though. And most people aren't, they just like to mess around. If you're sick of the joke, you're on the wrong site. |
Dec 3, 2014 12:10 AM
#103
Dec 3, 2014 3:48 AM
#104
DragonQuest3 said: traed said: GNExia236A said: Is that even a question? DFC or death. I'm just sad that I have to groan every time I come to these forums because people are still talking about the same dumb things. Just because you don't understand the appeal doesn't make it dumb. |
Dec 3, 2014 3:52 AM
#105
I don't have a thing for lolis, I prefer my waifu to be older than 17 and with curves. Highschool girls are just as attractive as every other type of girl. |
Dec 3, 2014 7:01 AM
#106
DragonQuest3 said: JonyJC said: Lolis are for fun, high school girls they stay the same age and I keep getting older, y'know what I'm sayin? In all seriousness that was a good movie. Yeah I saw it when I was 16 and could relate to somethe characters |
Dec 3, 2014 7:46 AM
#107
Praland said: Yui > Yang Wenli K-On > LOGH They're in high school. They're not lolis. Well, I consider lolis only the terrible and annoying chicks from middle school (when they're portrayed as such of course. Being in middle school does not necessarily imply a bad characterization though. But being that kind of middle schooler does). |
blankflatDec 3, 2014 7:51 AM
Dec 3, 2014 7:48 AM
#108
MAL theme song |
Dec 3, 2014 7:55 AM
#109
Kolnikov said: Since when is loli factor based on what grade you're in? >__>Praland said: Yui > Yang Wenli K-On > LOGH They're in high school. They're not lolis. Well, I consider lolis only the terrible and annoying chicks from middle school (when they're portrayed as such of course. Being in middle school does not necessarily imply a bad characterization though. But being that kind of middle schooler does). |
Dec 3, 2014 7:57 AM
#110
HaXXspetten said: People still think that "fictional age" is a factor in how to determine what character is a loli.Kolnikov said: Since when is loli factor based on what grade you're in? >__>Praland said: Yui > Yang Wenli K-On > LOGH They're in high school. They're not lolis. Well, I consider lolis only the terrible and annoying chicks from middle school (when they're portrayed as such of course. Being in middle school does not necessarily imply a bad characterization though. But being that kind of middle schooler does). It's art style, people... |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 8:00 AM
#111
Dec 3, 2014 8:02 AM
#112
HaXXspetten said: Kolnikov said: Since when is loli factor based on what grade you're in? >__>Praland said: Yui > Yang Wenli K-On > LOGH They're in high school. They're not lolis. Well, I consider lolis only the terrible and annoying chicks from middle school (when they're portrayed as such of course. Being in middle school does not necessarily imply a bad characterization though. But being that kind of middle schooler does). Loli is underage girl. But 16~17 isn't really underage. Of course the character can be portrayed as cute, fragile, annoying, but that just means it's a normal girl being portrayed as an underage girl, so she isn't a loli per se. |
blankflatDec 3, 2014 8:17 AM
Dec 3, 2014 8:02 AM
#113
Dec 3, 2014 10:09 AM
#114
I'm not into lolis and we I'm from the UK so we don't have High School over here meaning I have no interest In High School Girls, Unless I move some where which has them, In which case I may become interested |
Dec 3, 2014 10:42 AM
#115
kami_desu said: damn still in highschool and already so much anime and manga.Well, the characters in k-on are older then me so... Pauper said: yeah 2D > 3D, coming from a guy with a 3D gfI cry myself to sleep because I will never have a 2D gf |
My Reviews and Rants: http://bunny1ov3r.wordpress.com/ 痛就是爱 |
Dec 3, 2014 12:01 PM
#116
Moe Is Love Moe Is Life Haters in 3*2*1 |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Dec 3, 2014 12:02 PM
#117
High School girls are legit. Lolis are cute. Would make daughter of irl. |
☕ Truth be told, I'm quite proud of my house blend. To attain my flavor and fragrance, I use five different types of coffee beans. ☕ |
Dec 3, 2014 1:14 PM
#119
But theyre so kawaii why woudlnt i obsess over them? |
Dec 3, 2014 1:19 PM
#120
What would be wrong about me obsessing over highschool girls when I'm in high school myself? |
|
Dec 3, 2014 1:29 PM
#121
Well.... No, I just love 'em <3 |
Signature removed. Please follow the signature rules, as defined in the Site & Forum Guidelines. |
Dec 3, 2014 1:49 PM
#122
Kaiju said: But theyre so kawaii why woudlnt i obsess over them? Probably the OP is talking about sexual obsession, which is weird and disgusting. But consider them as cute, lovely, funny and be obsessed about that isn't wrong at all, since they're all of that. From my point of view though, a loli character has already a ton of sexual implications, because that's what loli is: to give underage girls sexual appeal. And being an otaku lolicon is to have a complex over the sexual implications of fictional underage girls, which is, in my point of view, extremely pathetic. I guess the OP share the same opinion. I'll give an example of what I consider loli and what I consider normal little girls: Renge (normal underage girl) from Non Non Biyori is a typical portrait of a child imho, and I think she is simply adorable. Shiro (loli) from NGNL is a little girl with a ton of sexual implications to cater to lolicon and otakus, and I think this is pathetic and disgusting. If the OP is using loli with this connotation, then I agree with him. About high school girls, I don't consider them lolis regardless of what every wiki says. Because for me a loli first has to be underage, and not only look like underage, and then come the sexual implications. So, basically, a cute underage girl isn't necessarily a loli, but an underage girl with sexual implications to cater the viewers is, by my definition, a loli. |
Dec 3, 2014 3:52 PM
#123
"weird and disgusting" Two words that are completely irrelevant. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 4:47 PM
#124
Immahnoob said: "weird and disgusting" Two words that are completely irrelevant. Topkek |
Dec 3, 2014 4:49 PM
#125
Kolnikov said: Yeah, sometimes the truth can be funny indeed.Immahnoob said: "weird and disgusting" Two words that are completely irrelevant. Topkek |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 4:57 PM
#126
Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: Yeah, sometimes the truth can be funny indeed.Immahnoob said: "weird and disgusting" Two words that are completely irrelevant. Topkek Truth, your bait was awesome, but they're indeed irrelevant since the whole post is my point of view on the matter. |
Dec 3, 2014 5:21 PM
#128
Damn, if I were you I'd hide under a rock where all this "bait" wouldn't reach me. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 5:28 PM
#129
rawr97 said: What would be wrong about me obsessing over highschool girls when I'm in high school myself? I'm not in high school, but I like high school girls irl. Plus, they're easier to go out with. Am I wrong? Again, what I have been saying. Who would consider 16~17 underage anyway? This is just insane, as if I, only one year older, would be able to manipulate high school girls and demand them to obey me. Even the police couldn't care less about high school girls fucking whoever they want. |
Dec 3, 2014 5:30 PM
#130
You do know other countries have lower ages of consent than 16-17, do you? |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 5:33 PM
#131
Immahnoob said: You do know other countries have lower ages of consent than 16-17, do you? Yeah, but I don't know nor I live in those places. So, don't see why I should care. But yeah, I do know. Just don't know which countries have those lower ages consents... |
Dec 3, 2014 5:35 PM
#132
Kolnikov said: Not being ignorant is better than being ignorant in most cases, if you know other countries do it, why can't yours do the same? You take more than one point of view to make a judgement generally. Also, the Internet is always your friend when you need information.Immahnoob said: You do know other countries have lower ages of consent than 16-17, do you? Yeah, but I don't know nor I live in those places. So, don't see why should I care. But yeah, I do know. Just don't know which countries have those lower ages consents... |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 5:43 PM
#133
Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: Not being ignorant is better than being ignorant in most cases, if you know other countries do it, why can't yours do the same? You take more than one point of view to make a judgement generally. Also, the Internet is always your friend when you need information.Immahnoob said: You do know other countries have lower ages of consent than 16-17, do you? Yeah, but I don't know nor I live in those places. So, don't see why should I care. But yeah, I do know. Just don't know which countries have those lower ages consents... It already does, is just not institutionalized. For this matter they don't have problems, but I prefer the way it is now, since we already have many problems with driving accidents, alcohol and cigars. No need for more teenagers messing around legally. They still can do if they really want to do though, but then let's them take the responsibility (what we need is lower the criminal majority age). Lol, just realized you led me into your fucking trap. Do you have pleasure talking nonsense and complete unrelated things to the thread btw? If funny to see you asking bullcrap around though, guess I have to ignore the next times. |
blankflatDec 3, 2014 6:11 PM
Dec 3, 2014 6:29 PM
#134
How is it irrelevant when we're talking about liking high school girls? Also, why shouldn't teenagers mess around legally? Sex is easy to understand, it's natural and it's also healthy. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 6:30 PM
#135
Gator said: Took the words out of my mindI don't have a thing for lolis, I prefer my waifu to be older than 17 and with curves. Highschool girls are just as attractive as every other type of girl. |
Dec 3, 2014 6:36 PM
#136
Immahnoob said: How is it irrelevant when we're talking about liking high school girls? Also, why shouldn't teenagers mess around legally? Sex is easy to understand, it's natural and it's also healthy. The way they mess around is already enough. Sex isn't forbidden, nobody will try to supervise what teenagers do within four walls anyway only in China probably. And they already have a lot of sex. |
Dec 3, 2014 6:37 PM
#137
DragonQuest3 said: Because I thought it was just joking at first but the fact you guys are still talking about such is kinda disturbing. I can't help but feel sad I can never expect a decent conversation out of most of you on this forum. What the fuck do you think? You think this is a game? |
Dec 3, 2014 6:37 PM
#138
Kolnikov said: That's not answering my question and your later statements dismiss your earlier statements, if they already fool around, why is the law there then?Immahnoob said: How is it irrelevant when we're talking about liking high school girls? Also, why shouldn't teenagers mess around legally? Sex is easy to understand, it's natural and it's also healthy. The way they mess around is already enough. Sex isn't forbidden, nobody will try to supervise what teenagers do within four walls anyway only in China probably. And they already have a lot of sex. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 6:38 PM
#139
Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: That's not answering my question and your later statements dismiss your earlier statements, if they already fool around, why is the law there then?Immahnoob said: How is it irrelevant when we're talking about liking high school girls? Also, why shouldn't teenagers mess around legally? Sex is easy to understand, it's natural and it's also healthy. The way they mess around is already enough. Sex isn't forbidden, nobody will try to supervise what teenagers do within four walls anyway only in China probably. And they already have a lot of sex. Limits =D |
Dec 3, 2014 6:40 PM
#140
Kolnikov said: Still not answering my question or relevant.Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: Immahnoob said: How is it irrelevant when we're talking about liking high school girls? Also, why shouldn't teenagers mess around legally? Sex is easy to understand, it's natural and it's also healthy. The way they mess around is already enough. Sex isn't forbidden, nobody will try to supervise what teenagers do within four walls anyway only in China probably. And they already have a lot of sex. Limits =D |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 6:41 PM
#141
Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: Still not answering what I want to hear.Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: That's not answering my question and your later statements dismiss your earlier statements, if they already fool around, why is the law there then?Immahnoob said: How is it irrelevant when we're talking about liking high school girls? Also, why shouldn't teenagers mess around legally? Sex is easy to understand, it's natural and it's also healthy. The way they mess around is already enough. Sex isn't forbidden, nobody will try to supervise what teenagers do within four walls anyway only in China probably. And they already have a lot of sex. Limits =D fixed. I answered your questions, dunno what you're talking about mate. |
Dec 3, 2014 6:43 PM
#142
Kolnikov said: Actually, you didn't... "The way they mess around is already enough." you didn't answer why. "Limits =D" you didn't answer why they should have limits.Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: That's not answering my question and your later statements dismiss your earlier statements, if they already fool around, why is the law there then?Immahnoob said: How is it irrelevant when we're talking about liking high school girls? Also, why shouldn't teenagers mess around legally? Sex is easy to understand, it's natural and it's also healthy. The way they mess around is already enough. Sex isn't forbidden, nobody will try to supervise what teenagers do within four walls anyway only in China probably. And they already have a lot of sex. Limits =D fixed. I answered your questions, dunno what you're talking about mate. Etc. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 6:45 PM
#143
Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: Actually, you didn't... "The way they mess around is already enough." you didn't answer why. "Limits =D" you didn't answer why they should have limits.Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: Still not answering what I want to hear.Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: That's not answering my question and your later statements dismiss your earlier statements, if they already fool around, why is the law there then?Immahnoob said: How is it irrelevant when we're talking about liking high school girls? Also, why shouldn't teenagers mess around legally? Sex is easy to understand, it's natural and it's also healthy. The way they mess around is already enough. Sex isn't forbidden, nobody will try to supervise what teenagers do within four walls anyway only in China probably. And they already have a lot of sex. Limits =D fixed. I answered your questions, dunno what you're talking about mate. Etc. Hmmm, okay, so you didn't see. ''Why they should have limits, kolnikov?'' - Because the way they mess around is already enough, Immahnoob. no fun allowed. |
Dec 3, 2014 6:47 PM
#144
Kolnikov said: That's not a relevant answer though. Why is it already enough? Where's the rule that it says "It's already enough."?Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: Still not answering what I want to hear.Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: That's not answering my question and your later statements dismiss your earlier statements, if they already fool around, why is the law there then?Immahnoob said: How is it irrelevant when we're talking about liking high school girls? Also, why shouldn't teenagers mess around legally? Sex is easy to understand, it's natural and it's also healthy. The way they mess around is already enough. Sex isn't forbidden, nobody will try to supervise what teenagers do within four walls anyway only in China probably. And they already have a lot of sex. Limits =D fixed. I answered your questions, dunno what you're talking about mate. Etc. Hmmm, okay, so you didn't see. ''Why they should have limits, kolnikov?'' - Because the way they mess around is already enough, Immahnoob. no fun allowed. Your responses have no proof, so they're invalid. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 6:53 PM
#145
Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: That's not a relevant answer though. Why is it already enough? Where's the rule that it says "It's already enough."?Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: Actually, you didn't... "The way they mess around is already enough." you didn't answer why. "Limits =D" you didn't answer why they should have limits.Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: Still not answering what I want to hear.Immahnoob said: Kolnikov said: That's not answering my question and your later statements dismiss your earlier statements, if they already fool around, why is the law there then?Immahnoob said: How is it irrelevant when we're talking about liking high school girls? Also, why shouldn't teenagers mess around legally? Sex is easy to understand, it's natural and it's also healthy. The way they mess around is already enough. Sex isn't forbidden, nobody will try to supervise what teenagers do within four walls anyway only in China probably. And they already have a lot of sex. Limits =D fixed. I answered your questions, dunno what you're talking about mate. Etc. Hmmm, okay, so you didn't see. ''Why they should have limits, kolnikov?'' - Because the way they mess around is already enough, Immahnoob. no fun allowed. Your responses have no proof, so they're invalid. The rule that says is already enough is called law, and some things are particular prohibited to teenagers. Unfair society, unfair and unreasonable rules, irrational laws, sometimes leads to a better organization, so it seems. So, they're not so irrational after all, the results aren't so bad. I could pick them by looking on how they're working. Not fully satisfied, but is better like this than without them, so it seems. |
Dec 3, 2014 6:56 PM
#146
the age of consent in brazil (if that's where you live (as your avatar implies)) is actually 14, just some minor thing to point out. |
Dec 3, 2014 6:56 PM
#147
Law is not inherently right, try again. And the rest is pretty irrelevant, just because there is cancer and we still can't cure it or get rid of it that does not mean we can't try. Eearu said: the age of consent in brazil (if that's where you live (as your avatar implies)) is actually 14, just some minor thing to point out. The same for Italy. |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
Dec 3, 2014 7:00 PM
#148
>Law is not inherently right Who said it is? =D >the age of consent Hmm, sorry, I translated the ''age of consent'' in a wrong way, so I thought it was for driving lol. |
Dec 3, 2014 7:05 PM
#150
Kolnikov said: >Law is not inherently right Who said it is? =D "The rule that says is already enough is called law" |
Play League of Legends here! Autocrat said: Hitler was good, objectively. |
More topics from this board
» Hottest Halloween costume someone can dress up as ?VabbingSips - Yesterday |
6 |
by RainyEvenings
»»
2 minutes ago |
|
» Who were your fav horror movie characters?VabbingSips - Sep 19 |
15 |
by RainyEvenings
»»
3 minutes ago |
|
» What do you think of men who act like it's manly to disregard their health or well-being?fleurbleue - 9 minutes ago |
0 |
by fleurbleue
»»
9 minutes ago |
|
» Have you ever voted in a municipal election, or do you just not care much about who your mayor is?fleurbleue - Yesterday |
20 |
by RainyEvenings
»»
9 minutes ago |
|
» If you could own any mythical creature as a pet, what would it be and why?Fukoku - Oct 3 |
41 |
by HrrmyHmHuuuuhHm
»»
10 minutes ago |