New
Aug 28, 2012 5:52 AM
#51
Rawrol said: Deziah said: DrunkenBlowfish said: Just gonna put my opinion on my sleeve for a second and say that if you're reading this kind of shit and you're not a minor yourself, legal or not, you might wanna seek some help, or at the very least go meet some older women. ^This OP, you sick fuck. Go get some help. And that is your own opinion, Keep it to yourself rather than denouncing others only because you don't approve of it. Do you believe that the love and sexual tension between a 40 year old and 12 y/o is real and should be legal for the sole reason of not having his perversion denounced? |
Aug 28, 2012 6:01 AM
#52
XeroCleaths said: Rawrol said: Deziah said: DrunkenBlowfish said: Just gonna put my opinion on my sleeve for a second and say that if you're reading this kind of shit and you're not a minor yourself, legal or not, you might wanna seek some help, or at the very least go meet some older women. ^This OP, you sick fuck. Go get some help. And that is your own opinion, Keep it to yourself rather than denouncing others only because you don't approve of it. Do you believe that the love and sexual tension between a 40 year old and 12 y/o is real and should be legal for the sole reason of not having his perversion denounced? But lolicon is harmless. so what is the problem? |
Aug 28, 2012 6:05 AM
#53
XeroCleaths said: Rawrol said: Deziah said: DrunkenBlowfish said: Just gonna put my opinion on my sleeve for a second and say that if you're reading this kind of shit and you're not a minor yourself, legal or not, you might wanna seek some help, or at the very least go meet some older women. ^This OP, you sick fuck. Go get some help. And that is your own opinion, Keep it to yourself rather than denouncing others only because you don't approve of it. Do you believe that the love and sexual tension between a 40 year old and 12 y/o is real and should be legal for the sole reason of not having his perversion denounced? Are you implying enjoying media of depicting two fictional characters having fictional encounters is some thing to denounce simply because their nebulous stated ages? |
It doesn't think, it doesn't feel, it doesn't laugh or cry..... All it does from dusk till dawn is make the soldiers die. |
Aug 28, 2012 6:08 AM
#54
Rawrol said: Deziah said: DrunkenBlowfish said: Just gonna put my opinion on my sleeve for a second and say that if you're reading this kind of shit and you're not a minor yourself, legal or not, you might wanna seek some help, or at the very least go meet some older women. ^This OP, you sick fuck. Go get some help. And that is your own opinion, Keep it to yourself rather than denouncing others only because you don't approve of it. This is a message board. I can state my negative opinion if I choose to, regardless of whether you, OP, or anyone else gets butthurt over my comment. According to your logic, you should keep your opinion of my opinion to yourself. Since opinions aren't "welcome" here, and you don't "approve" of mine (like I give a damn). Seriously, whether I "denounce" the sick fuckers ITT should be irrelevant to you anyway. Unless, of course, you're one of them. |
![]() |
Aug 28, 2012 6:17 AM
#55
Deziah said: Rawrol said: Deziah said: DrunkenBlowfish said: Just gonna put my opinion on my sleeve for a second and say that if you're reading this kind of shit and you're not a minor yourself, legal or not, you might wanna seek some help, or at the very least go meet some older women. ^This OP, you sick fuck. Go get some help. And that is your own opinion, Keep it to yourself rather than denouncing others only because you don't approve of it. This is a message board. I can state my negative opinion if I choose to, regardless of whether you, OP, or anyone else gets butthurt over my comment. According to your logic, you should keep your opinion of my opinion to yourself. Since opinions aren't "welcome" here, and you don't "approve" of mine (like I give a damn). Seriously, whether I "denounce" the sick fuckers ITT should be irrelevant to you anyway. Unless, of course, you're one of them. But agreed to faulty logic. Just because your attracted to older women doesn't mean you can't be a pedophile. There plenty of people under the age of 18 who look an act like the general conception of people over 18. But having sex with them will still get you registered as a sex offender. and there are people who are over 18 but look and act like people under 18, but having sex with them is perfectly legal. ontop that I 100% guarantee any one who's gone through puberty has had sexual thoughts about a minor. |
It doesn't think, it doesn't feel, it doesn't laugh or cry..... All it does from dusk till dawn is make the soldiers die. |
Aug 28, 2012 9:07 AM
#56
Alright I think after 4 pages of continuous quoting and complaining I think I'll make a guest appearance here., so without further adieu lets start with people implying I'm using facts. At no point did I present anything in a factual manner. This has all been my opinion, which still stands. I still think you guys a freaks and you guys have issues, serious issues that you should seek help for, someone had to be the one to say it. I the end I know that some of you sill read this and carry on with your day, but many of you will not. Many of you will continue to carry on for another 4 pages, so see you guys on page 8. |
Aug 28, 2012 9:13 AM
#57
DrunkenBlowfish said: Alright I think after 4 pages of continuous quoting and complaining I think I'll make a guest appearance here., so without further adieu lets start with people implying I'm using facts. At no point did I present anything in a factual manner. This has all been my opinion, which still stands. I still think you guys a freaks and you guys have issues, serious issues that you should seek help for, someone had to be the one to say it. I the end I know that some of you sill read this and carry on with your day, but many of you will not. Many of you will continue to carry on for another 4 pages, so see you guys on page 8. There is a difference between things that are subjective and things are objective. "Needing to seek help" is objective in a way that you only need to seek help if something is actually harmful to you. "Healthy" is also objective, you can't have opinions on what is healthy and what is not healthy. Thus it can be assumed you stated "facts", without backing those "facts" up with proof. Ofcourse, considering them freaks is a opinion, But that is the same thing as calling all naruto fans "retards". Or calling all moe fans "neckbeards". We weren't discussing "your post" for 4 pages, you're not as special and awesome as you think you are. |
rederoinAug 28, 2012 9:18 AM
Aug 28, 2012 9:23 AM
#58
rederoin said: Just ignore him.DrunkenBlowfish said: Alright I think after 4 pages of continuous quoting and complaining I think I'll make a guest appearance here., so without further adieu lets start with people implying I'm using facts. At no point did I present anything in a factual manner. This has all been my opinion, which still stands. I still think you guys a freaks and you guys have issues, serious issues that you should seek help for, someone had to be the one to say it. I the end I know that some of you sill read this and carry on with your day, but many of you will not. Many of you will continue to carry on for another 4 pages, so see you guys on page 8. There is a difference between things that are subjective and things are objective. "Needing to seek help" is objective in a way that you only need to seek help if something is actually harmful to you. "Healthy" is also objective, you can't have opinions on what is healthy and what is not healthy. Thus it can be assumed you stated "facts", without backing those "facts" up with proof. Ofcourse, considering them freaks is a opinion, But that is the same thing as calling all naruto fans "retards". Or calling all moe fans "neckbeards". We weren't discussing "your post" for 4 pages, you're not as special and awesome as you think you are. He pretty much said he wont reply until page 8 if it even goes that far. He's nothing but a sad troll that runs away from debates/arguments. Just look at what he added on his sig after the first two pages lol. Ironically, he needs help himself if he can't properly argue with people and instead runs away. |
Aug 28, 2012 9:32 AM
#59
This basically sums up the answer: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080710141216AAs2ART ^Please read this! It's probably the most helpful answer I've found on the internet. |
Aug 28, 2012 9:41 AM
#60
so many posts for a problem that can be solved with either yes or no. |
Aug 28, 2012 9:45 AM
#61
Yvese said: rederoin said: Just ignore him.DrunkenBlowfish said: Alright I think after 4 pages of continuous quoting and complaining I think I'll make a guest appearance here., so without further adieu lets start with people implying I'm using facts. At no point did I present anything in a factual manner. This has all been my opinion, which still stands. I still think you guys a freaks and you guys have issues, serious issues that you should seek help for, someone had to be the one to say it. I the end I know that some of you sill read this and carry on with your day, but many of you will not. Many of you will continue to carry on for another 4 pages, so see you guys on page 8. There is a difference between things that are subjective and things are objective. "Needing to seek help" is objective in a way that you only need to seek help if something is actually harmful to you. "Healthy" is also objective, you can't have opinions on what is healthy and what is not healthy. Thus it can be assumed you stated "facts", without backing those "facts" up with proof. Ofcourse, considering them freaks is a opinion, But that is the same thing as calling all naruto fans "retards". Or calling all moe fans "neckbeards". We weren't discussing "your post" for 4 pages, you're not as special and awesome as you think you are. He pretty much said he wont reply until page 8 if it even goes that far. He's nothing but a sad troll that runs away from debates/arguments. Just look at what he added on his sig after the first two pages lol. Ironically, he needs help himself if he can't properly argue with people and instead runs away. Don't bait him. |
Aug 28, 2012 10:03 AM
#62
CrimsonLight said: Yvese said: rederoin said: Just ignore him.DrunkenBlowfish said: Alright I think after 4 pages of continuous quoting and complaining I think I'll make a guest appearance here., so without further adieu lets start with people implying I'm using facts. At no point did I present anything in a factual manner. This has all been my opinion, which still stands. I still think you guys a freaks and you guys have issues, serious issues that you should seek help for, someone had to be the one to say it. I the end I know that some of you sill read this and carry on with your day, but many of you will not. Many of you will continue to carry on for another 4 pages, so see you guys on page 8. There is a difference between things that are subjective and things are objective. "Needing to seek help" is objective in a way that you only need to seek help if something is actually harmful to you. "Healthy" is also objective, you can't have opinions on what is healthy and what is not healthy. Thus it can be assumed you stated "facts", without backing those "facts" up with proof. Ofcourse, considering them freaks is a opinion, But that is the same thing as calling all naruto fans "retards". Or calling all moe fans "neckbeards". We weren't discussing "your post" for 4 pages, you're not as special and awesome as you think you are. He pretty much said he wont reply until page 8 if it even goes that far. He's nothing but a sad troll that runs away from debates/arguments. Just look at what he added on his sig after the first two pages lol. Ironically, he needs help himself if he can't properly argue with people and instead runs away. Don't bait him. Obligatory. Also, thread related somewhat because it's a loli. ![]() |
Aug 28, 2012 10:17 AM
#63
I don't understand loli porn, or child porn for that matter, in the slightest, but be yourself. I guess. It would be very difficult for me to take someone who's into it seriously, but I would try my best. |
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
Aug 28, 2012 10:23 AM
#64
Post-Josh said: I don't understand loli porn, or child porn for that matter, in the slightest, but be yourself. I guess. It would be very difficult for me to take someone who's into it seriously, but I would try my best. I won't try my best. This thread isn't about whether it's legal or not, it's about who's right. Nobody is listening to what the other has to say. Have fun trolling people! |
Aug 28, 2012 10:28 AM
#65
How do you expect a thread about loli hentai to progress? For the record though, I don't think I'm right. I think I have an opinion and so I stated it. |
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
Aug 28, 2012 12:20 PM
#66
Post-Josh said: I don't understand loli porn, or child porn for that matter, in the slightest, but be yourself. I guess. It would be very difficult for me to take someone who's into it seriously, but I would try my best. Different people like different things; you just come to accept it. This thread however is doing the opposite. |
Aug 28, 2012 12:22 PM
#67
40 years old and 12 that's Fucked up who writes this shit!! |
If strength is justice, then is powerlessness a crime? |
Aug 28, 2012 12:35 PM
#68
CrimsonLight said: Post-Josh said: I don't understand loli porn, or child porn for that matter, in the slightest, but be yourself. I guess. It would be very difficult for me to take someone who's into it seriously, but I would try my best. Different people like different things; you just come to accept it. This thread however is doing the opposite. If only it were that simple. Everyone develops their own sense of what is wrong/what is right, and it's difficult to accept things that are in stark contrast to your "moral code" or whatever. And yes, being sexually attracted to lolis (which are ultimately a depiction of underage girls) is something I find questionable. It's easy for people to say "I'm open to everything, blah blah.", but I'm extremely skeptical that, when put into practice, anyone actually is. I would never condone physical, or verbal, abuse based on someone's sexual interests, but people with abnormal interests also must accept that they will be scrutinized and discriminated against. It's unrealistic to expect that everyone will train themselves to give people with abnormal fetishes equal treatment, it's just not going to happen. Edit: I don't mean abnormal in a positive or negative way, I just mean differing from the norm. |
JoshAug 28, 2012 12:40 PM
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
Aug 28, 2012 12:35 PM
#69
Just in wonder what is Loli?? Is some kind of new laught abrevation? [ i am not trying to be funny or troll ] |
Aug 28, 2012 12:37 PM
#70
Aug 28, 2012 12:38 PM
#71
Aug 28, 2012 12:49 PM
#72
This thread is hilarious. |
Aug 28, 2012 12:52 PM
#73
Some of you sound paranoid... What are you doing that will cause the police to come into your home and look through your computer? Even if you delete the stuff they can still "recover" it in most cases. You're probably safe though, Just don't look at the stuff in public... if someone sees it over your shoulder or whatever you could get into some trouble. {Certainly if it's a cop or the FBI or that guy from "To Catch a Predator".} |
Aug 28, 2012 12:53 PM
#74
Post-Josh said: CrimsonLight said: Post-Josh said: I don't understand loli porn, or child porn for that matter, in the slightest, but be yourself. I guess. It would be very difficult for me to take someone who's into it seriously, but I would try my best. Different people like different things; you just come to accept it. This thread however is doing the opposite. If only it were that simple. Everyone develops their own sense of what is wrong/what is right, and it's difficult to accept things that are in stark contrast to your "moral code" or whatever. And yes, being sexually attracted to lolis (which are ultimately a depiction of underage girls) is something I find questionable. It's easy for people to say "I'm open to everything, blah blah.", but I'm extremely skeptical that, when put into practice, anyone actually is. I would never condone physical, or verbal, abuse based on someone's sexual interests, but people with abnormal interests also must accept that they will be scrutinized and discriminated against. It's unrealistic to expect that everyone will train themselves to give people with abnormal fetishes equal treatment, it's just not going to happen. Edit: I don't mean abnormal in a positive or negative way, I just mean differing from the norm. Actually I find it quite simple. I, not giving too many fucks, find it really easy to accept and believe what people like/say. That might classify me as naive but well, whatever. I know I myself am attracted to loli, but hey I'm a teen so it's legal for me. I know people attracted to Guro and while that doesn't interest me in the slightest, I'm okay with it. But hey, we're not talking about me, talking about people in general. Oh well. So morale is, if you don't wanna get discriminated against and looked down upon, don't openly discuss your fetishes. |
Aug 28, 2012 1:07 PM
#75
OhNasti said: Just in wonder what is Loli?? Is some kind of new laught abrevation? [ i am not trying to be funny or troll ] Just append the two letters "ta" to that abbreviation and you got the word, which basically stands for sexually attractive minors or something. Edit: Someone just told me that loli ≠ lolita, dammit. Anyway, it has something to do with minors and sexuality. Post-Josh said: I would never condone physical, or verbal, abuse based on someone's sexual interests, but people with abnormal interests also must accept that they will be scrutinized and discriminated against. I know what you mean and I understand you, but what you say is basically why there are people opposing gay marriage: What is "abnormal"? I mean, this case is rather clear, children are to be protected from sexual abuse and therefore no one should have the right to have sex with a minor against her own will, and five year olds cannot have that will. But that's not new, remove the word "minors" and you have the perfect description for a rape. Not really our topic anymore, but classifying sexual preferences as "abnormal" and "normal" is rather vague. Back to the topic, I don't know whether it's legal or not (although I believe here in Germany it isn't), but the thing is, if someone gets attracted by children in a sexual way, then it's still better he watches that so-called lolicon stuff rather than real child porn (which certainly is a crime) or even actually abuses children (which is an even worse crime and the reason why real child porn does actually exist). Of course I'm not implying that anyone here would ever do such a thing, it's just why I personally wouldn't outlaw it. However it is questionable in a moralistic sense, highly even, so I suggest you (and I mean all of you who like lolicon) keep it for yourself. And maybe think about it, are a few of those pages really worh the legal risks they possibly bear? Edit2: Dunno, it's disgusting though. pretty much summarizes my own opinion on that. |
elytSmangnaGAug 28, 2012 1:59 PM
Aug 28, 2012 1:47 PM
#76
CrimsonLight said: Actually I find it quite simple. I, not giving too many fucks, find it really easy to accept and believe what people like/say. I know that "not giving a fuck" is cool these days and I joke about it as well, but it's not a real thing. You can't not care about anything, nor should you pretend to. VikingGe said: I know what you mean and I understand you, but what you say is basically why there are people opposing gay marriage: What is "abnormal"? I mean, this case is rather clear, children are to be protected from sexual abuse and therefore no one should have the right to have sex with a minor against her own will, and five year olds cannot have that will. But that's not new, remove the word "minors" and you have the perfect description for a rape. Not really our topic anymore, but classifying sexual preferences as "abnormal" and "normal" is rather vague. I wrote what I meant by abnormal in my post, not the norm. Yes, that's basically why some people oppose gay marriage. Obviously opinions are changing as more and more people realize that being gay is actually common, but more importantly that there are no strong negative implications. It's a lot harder to convince someone that there are no strong negative implications for being attracted to children. I suppose normal is generally accepted, abnormal is not. |
LoneWolf said: @Josh makes me sad to call myself Canadian. |
Aug 28, 2012 1:51 PM
#77
Yes it id but its like piracy, you basically need to be a idiot to get caught |
Immahnoob said: Jizzy, I know you have no idea how to argue for shit, tokiyashiro said: Jizzy as you would call yourself because youre a dick The most butthurt award goes to you And clearly you havent watched that many shows thats why you cant determine if a show is unique or not Or maybe you're just a child who likes common stuffs where hero saves the day and guys gets all the girls. Sad taste you have there kid you came up to me in the first place making you look more like a kid who got slapped without me even knowing it and start crying about it to me |
Aug 28, 2012 1:59 PM
#79
Post-Josh said: CrimsonLight said: Actually I find it quite simple. I, not giving too many fucks, find it really easy to accept and believe what people like/say. I know that "not giving a fuck" is cool these days and I joke about it as well, but it's not a real thing. You can't not care about anything, nor should you pretend to. No, I am not trying to say I'm a G. I'm just saying I care less than most people out there would about situations. Sorry if you misinterpreted that. That's just how it is. |
Aug 28, 2012 2:03 PM
#80
DrunkenBlowfish said: Just gonna put my opinion on my sleeve for a second and say that if you're reading this kind of shit and you're not a minor yourself, legal or not, you might wanna seek some help, or at the very least go meet some older women. What an insightful comment, full of openminded vision. Then, if you play GTA, you surely are a restrained robber/killer, amirite ? /facepalm @OP yes, the light of Tsukiminithing manor is definately obscene, no doubt about this. But it's a manga, not pictures of naked babies, so you should be fine. |
![]() ![]() |
Aug 28, 2012 2:03 PM
#81
Aug 28, 2012 2:06 PM
#82
Brb I'm going to report this to the government instead of convincing them to actually track down child molesters. |
Aug 28, 2012 2:10 PM
#83
Aug 28, 2012 2:11 PM
#84
Necro-sama said: rederoin said: OhNasti said: Just in wonder what is Loli?? Is some kind of new laught abrevation? [ i am not trying to be funny or troll ] google. Read Lolita. Lolita The term lolita is taken from the nickname of the title character in Vladimir Nabokov's novel Lolita. Lolita's actual name was Dolores Haze, with whom the narrator, Humbert Humbert, develops a sexual obsession.[6] Lola (diminutive: Lolita) is a common hypocorism for Dolores in some Spanish-speaking countries.[7] Nevertheless, "Lolita" and "loli" has come to be used as a general reference to a seductive or sexually attractive young girl.[8] Well than i dont think this is manga associated. that is what i found in wikipedia. Some dude toll me it was about litle girls getting having sex. some weird shit like that. - I ask on a Chat on a website while watching a anime online. does Chatango Chat's how ever you call em @G0053yyyy Shit aint funny dude i actually believed it was Laugthing out loud intentionally. instead of you putting that code for the image. you could of just put the definition. EDIT: Ya niqqa's **********************. just found out wtf it is, is when girl's have small boobs and they look like a kindergarden litle kid. that shit not my typee. /OUT_OF_THE_THREAD |
OhNastiAug 28, 2012 2:16 PM
Aug 28, 2012 2:25 PM
#85
To cut it short, Lolita, reduced to Loli, and then Lolicon (con is short for conplex) is the attraction to underage girls. Shotacon is the same but for underage boys. EDIT: Ninja'd by above user. So, if you happened to own pictures of underage boys/girls, sure you'll go to jail. But if it's a manga/anime you should be fine. Who the hell can tell for sure if a girl/boy is underage or not in an anime/manga anyway ? It's left to the viewer's imagination. And I'm pretty sure japanese people buying hentai/doujoinshi and the like (usually with incest, hey isn't that supposed to be illegal by our dear legislators as well?) aren't getting arrested for that. Borrowing money at interest rate from private banks should be illegal, but it isn't... So who can say what's illegal and what is ? Do you really think all the so-called illegal things are for the sake of the people? Say marijuana for example? Whereas Cigs and Alcohol are legal ? Don't get lobotomized by the media. |
![]() ![]() |
Aug 28, 2012 2:51 PM
#86
@OhNasti : Lolita could also describe young adult women who looks very childish and also wear childish clothes. You know, there also exists something called Lolita style or fashion. It depends on what you actually mean by lolita . Greetings Cyan |
Aug 28, 2012 3:33 PM
#87
XeroCleaths said: This basically sums up the answer: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080710141216AAs2ART ^Please read this! It's probably the most helpful answer I've found on the internet. Based on this advice, ALL MY STASH is obscene. but according to @CrimsonLight, if your are a minor, loli hentai is legal? CrimsonLight said: Post-Josh said: CrimsonLight said: Post-Josh said: I don't understand loli porn, or child porn for that matter, in the slightest, but be yourself. I guess. It would be very difficult for me to take someone who's into it seriously, but I would try my best. Different people like different things; you just come to accept it. This thread however is doing the opposite. If only it were that simple. Everyone develops their own sense of what is wrong/what is right, and it's difficult to accept things that are in stark contrast to your "moral code" or whatever. And yes, being sexually attracted to lolis (which are ultimately a depiction of underage girls) is something I find questionable. It's easy for people to say "I'm open to everything, blah blah.", but I'm extremely skeptical that, when put into practice, anyone actually is. I would never condone physical, or verbal, abuse based on someone's sexual interests, but people with abnormal interests also must accept that they will be scrutinized and discriminated against. It's unrealistic to expect that everyone will train themselves to give people with abnormal fetishes equal treatment, it's just not going to happen. Edit: I don't mean abnormal in a positive or negative way, I just mean differing from the norm. Actually I find it quite simple. I, not giving too many fucks, find it really easy to accept and believe what people like/say. That might classify me as naive but well, whatever. I know I myself am attracted to loli, but hey I'm a teen so it's legal for me. I know people attracted to Guro and while that doesn't interest me in the slightest, I'm okay with it. But hey, we're not talking about me, talking about people in general. Oh well. So morale is, if you don't wanna get discriminated against and looked down upon, don't openly discuss your fetishes. First off, I'm still considered minor by US constitution. Does this mean I'm totally clean? |
Aug 28, 2012 4:14 PM
#88
Ryokami said: unj008 said: First off, I'm still considered minor by US constitution. Does this mean I'm totally clean? As far as I know, possession and distribution of child porn is illegal, no matter if you're minor or adult. Whether loli hentai should or should not be considered CP is discusable. If you're adult having a lolicon collection you could possibly be branded as pedophile, but as a minor, assuming that lolicon =/= CP, you should be clean. But lolicon does not fit the definition of pedophilia. So how is that possible? or are those people really that retarded? |
Aug 28, 2012 4:42 PM
#89
Post-Josh said: CrimsonLight said: Post-Josh said: I don't understand loli porn, or child porn for that matter, in the slightest, but be yourself. I guess. It would be very difficult for me to take someone who's into it seriously, but I would try my best. Different people like different things; you just come to accept it. This thread however is doing the opposite. If only it were that simple. Everyone develops their own sense of what is wrong/what is right, and it's difficult to accept things that are in stark contrast to your "moral code" or whatever. And yes, being sexually attracted to lolis (which are ultimately a depiction of underage girls) is something I find questionable. It's easy for people to say "I'm open to everything, blah blah.", but I'm extremely skeptical that, when put into practice, anyone actually is. I would never condone physical, or verbal, abuse based on someone's sexual interests, but people with abnormal interests also must accept that they will be scrutinized and discriminated against. It's unrealistic to expect that everyone will train themselves to give people with abnormal fetishes equal treatment, it's just not going to happen. Edit: I don't mean abnormal in a positive or negative way, I just mean differing from the norm. Fun Facts. Once upon a time. Wearing a Bikini used to be considered abnormal sexual behavior Having Oral Sex was considered abnormal sexual behavior Being Gay was considered abnormal sexual behavior (and still is) Owning a dildo was considered Abnormal sexual behavior Romantically Kissing a person you weren't married to was considered abnormal sexual behavior. a Woman showing off her legs was considered abnormal sexual behavior Being simply seen with a man you weren't married to after dark was considered abnormal sexual behavior. Heck to most people simply being sexually attract to cartoon is sexually abnormal behavior and the list goes on, On top that what I listed was also ILLEGAL at some point in time. What's considered "abnormal" usually only considered that because it has some bizarre and senseless stigma attached to it for no good reason. Ryokami said: Loli hentai displays sexual intercourse between adults and prepubescent girls.. But it doesn't, it depicts fictional characters with implied ages having intercourse. Looks do not denote a fictional character's age, no does their stated age. Both are nebulous. |
JigeroAug 28, 2012 4:46 PM
It doesn't think, it doesn't feel, it doesn't laugh or cry..... All it does from dusk till dawn is make the soldiers die. |
Aug 28, 2012 4:50 PM
#90
Ryokami said: As far as I know, possession and distribution of child porn is illegal, no matter if you're minor or adult. Whether loli hentai should or should not be considered CP is discusable. If you're adult having a lolicon collection you could possibly be branded as pedophile, but as a minor, assuming that lolicon =/= CP, you should be clean. The reason CP is illegal is because it involves the exploitation of children who cannot consent. That's all. Lolicon is not modeled after real children, hence there are no victims, hence it is not (or should not be) considered CP. |
![]() |
Aug 28, 2012 5:06 PM
#91
Ryokami said: rederoin said: But lolicon does not fit the definition of pedophilia. So how is that possible? or are those people really that retarded? The definition of pedophilia (copied from Wikipedia) is as follows: As a medical diagnosis, pedophilia, or paedophilia, is defined as a psychiatric disorder in persons who are 16 years of age or older typically characterized by a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children (generally age 13 years or younger, though onset of puberty varies). The prepubescent child must be at least five years younger than the adolescent before the attraction can be diagnosed as pedophilia. It doesn't say that a person has to be attracted to a real child to be a pedophile, so I'm assuming it would apply for cases where girls are fictional/drawn. Loli hentai displays sexual intercourse between adults and prepubescent girls. I'm not saying that you have to necessarily get turned on by it, but just possessing it can make you guilable in eyes of someone who disapproves lolicon and you can be considered a pedophile by that person. The definition actually refers to real children, and loli's don't look like them, and neither is it possible to know whether they have hit puberty or not. In other words, being attracted to loli's does not fit the definition of pedophilia, anybody who says otherwise is wrong. |
More topics from this board
» 🍉 Summer 2025: Anime of the Season (AOTS) ( 1 2 3 4 5 )nirererin - Oct 9 |
222 |
by dazedcowcow62
»»
7 minutes ago |
|
» Is it bad to raw-dog seasonals?thewiru - 7 hours ago |
40 |
by Lucifrost
»»
26 minutes ago |
|
Poll: » Has BL animanga been getting better?Auron - Yesterday |
16 |
by palm-tree
»»
43 minutes ago |
|
» ☀️ Anime Summer 2025 Male & Female Characters Tournament ( 1 2 3 )ISeeLifePeople - Oct 5 |
111 |
by nirererin
»»
56 minutes ago |
|
» Has using MAL made you enjoy anime less?Dragevard - Oct 8 |
39 |
by nachomaxo1
»»
57 minutes ago |