New
Mar 28, 2011 8:54 PM
#101
Mar 28, 2011 8:59 PM
#102
Cashdaxxx said: Anime != Cartoons Anime > Cartoons(even in 3D) 'nuff said... o hay, so i herd u dunt no wut anime is sh0rt 4? You've got to be a complete imbecile to think that anime and cartoons are separate entities. Anime is just a more specific term, referring to Japanese Animation, whereas 'cartoon' encompasses all forms of animation (and several forms art). What do they mean by 3D? Do they mean by the glasses or CGI? I don't have enough hands... I've seen 3D before and most of it is shit when you compare it to it's 2D counterpart. Last time I checked, Pixar CGI films don't look like shit compared to 2D animation. It's pretty much superior in every way. Even Imagi's Astroy Boy CGI film is vastly superior to Japanese Animation in terms of quality. |
no-thanksMar 28, 2011 9:02 PM
Mar 28, 2011 9:37 PM
#104
4 reason why people use fansubs: 1. My issue with this has always been that fansubs are not only freely available (although not entirely legal), their quality is usually better and the episodes are released soon after their airing in Japan. 2. It takes so much time for the anime to get localized. 3. The prices of the released dvd and blu-ray discs are ridiculous... I am not paying 60+ dollars for 3 episodes... 4. Minor one, but I still find it inconvenient to keep changing discs in order to watch a different episode. The only caveat to online downloading is disk space, which is extremely cheap. Yes, fansubs are ruining the industry because any person would like to have something that is free, superior, on time and convenient than something that is expensive, inferior, late and inconvenient. Yes, fansubs bring more attention to anime in foregin regions... but, it simply increases the number of people illegally downloading it... |
Mar 28, 2011 9:37 PM
#105
Onibokusu said: Cashdaxxx said: Anime != Cartoons Anime > Cartoons(even in 3D) 'nuff said... o hay, so i herd u dunt no wut anime is sh0rt 4? You've got to be a complete imbecile to think that anime and cartoons are separate entities. Anime is just a more specific term, referring to Japanese Animation, whereas 'cartoon' encompasses all forms of animation (and several forms art facepalm.jpg ILOVEMY WIKIPEDIA said: Anime is commonly defined as animation originating in Japan. In English-speaking countries, anime is also referred to as "Japanese animation". and Cartoons is FYI generally means WESTERN ANIMATION(as an accepted term) put wiki as a reference on your quote you nerd.. |
CashdaxMar 28, 2011 9:42 PM
Mar 28, 2011 9:53 PM
#106
lawls. Domestic strategies are not gonna cut it; you're playing a global game mister. |
Banner made by suikka |
Mar 28, 2011 10:10 PM
#107
Naruto sucks as an anime, the manga being way more enjoyable without these stupid fillers. I'd say it probably would've gone down the drain even if online streeming never existed. And 2D >>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D Not many good series even gets localized where i come from, and they f**kin censor out all the fanservice, even a simple non-perverted kiss scene gets cut. And DVD stores here are so full of pirates, the only way i'd get a legal copy of something is that i order it. So my only option is this illegal online streeming/ downloads. |
Mar 28, 2011 10:14 PM
#108
fansub actually helps promote anime ........we Users got to know the quality of the anime before spending on it |
Mar 28, 2011 10:24 PM
#109
Mar 28, 2011 10:33 PM
#110
Cashdaxxx said: BlackSnake56 said: lol...more like we won't understand those anime(s) xDfansub actually helps promote anime ........we Users got to know the quality of the anime before spending on it do you want to spend on thing that you didn't even understand a bit ? i'm not lol xD i will at least try 1-5 eps than if the anime is good i will try to buy it |
Mar 28, 2011 10:37 PM
#111
i will die if animu turns 3D. but the only people that are buying all the naruto volumes are little kids. so when the older people, who know how to use the internet, finds a certain like, starts to give out quotes like "Why buy them if they are free online." I still buy manga. >_< Even if i'm super broke, i got $15 and i'm gonna buy some random, interesting series i see. |
Mar 28, 2011 11:54 PM
#112
Mar 29, 2011 12:11 AM
#113
SuperSaiyen said: The only thing I agree on is that 3D is overwhelming 2D I may be wrong but I think the 3D they are referring to are anime shows like Highschool of the Dead, and Kore Zombie Desu Ka? If so, I agree as well. I find 3D animes to be extremely pleasing to the eye. Does it mean all 3D anime shows are good? No, but it does attract potential viewers. Of that's not what they mean by 3D then I don't really agree. Id prefer watching anime without having things literally pop up in my face. Fansubs have always been around...I don't know why they realize it is a problem now. 51% drop in sales...damn. I feel a bit guilty now... |
Mar 29, 2011 12:20 AM
#114
They're surprised crunchyroll doesn't do well? Really? Maybe if the subs didn't suck, with shitty quality, people would watch there. As it is, i find myself waiting weeks sometimes for a real release, rather than just torrenting the crunchyroll eps (no chance in hell i'd pay for them, and lolstreaming too). Gonna have to disagree with #4 too. As someone with zero income, i've spent around ¥25,000 in the last year on various merchandise, ordered from japan. If i could afford it, i'd easily spend hundreds of thousands on things. If i couldn't watch anime for free, i simply wouldn't watch it, and never would have spent a dime on anime merchandise. And i know i'm not alone here either. DesolateOne said: Probably because before the internet, it wasn't nearly as big, and it was much, much harder to distribute.Fansubs have always been around...I don't know why they realize it is a problem now. |
Mar 29, 2011 1:23 AM
#115
I get a laugh every time someone says DVDs are too expensive. When I started collecting, anime was $45 - $70 + shipping for 1-3 episodes on VHS. I never did work up the nerve to spend $180 for all 4 episodes of Macross Plus (that's $45 per episode for those who don't like math), but I did pay $50 for Tenchi the Movie 2 (I think it was about $67 after shipping, taxes, and border fees). Now complete season box sets for most series cost $30- $70. $360 for a new 12 episode series 20 years ago vs. $30 for a new 12 episode series now... I think DVDs are affordable. That said, it's still hard to expect people to buy DVDs without having seen at least some of it first, and some shows are just too niche and will never get licenced, leaving the internet as the only place to go. |
Mar 29, 2011 3:17 AM
#116
In my country a DVD with 3-4 episodes cost about 50$. These are also region 1 so you'll need a region 1 or multi-region DVD-player to watch them. Most of the licensed anime released in western countries also have bad subtitles. But they only release horrible anime anyway. Pixar, dreamworks and such have contributed with some good movies, but keep that kind of 3D animation away from japanese anime!! Movies like "Apple seed" should've been animated with traditional 2D animation. |
Mar 29, 2011 4:27 AM
#117
try removing the free fansubs and i'm sure the sales will go even more lower outside japan |
Mar 29, 2011 5:08 AM
#118
Naruto does not make money because someone decided that it would be better to run it for a few extra seasons rather than stick to the actual story with any kind of quality. I don't know who that person is, but that's really the only explanation. Fansubs are not to blame for Naruto's shittiness. What confuses me the most is why anime adaptations like naruto and bleach, which are infamous for having boring, awful, low-quality fillers, insist on straying from the manga. Like, do they really think anyone would be upset if the original Naruto (not shippuden, I couldn't bring myself to watch it) was only 50 or 100 episodes, was released more slowly, in much better quality, and didn't stray from the manga at all? No one is going to say like "oh yeah well it's exactly like the manga so I definitely don't want to watch it." People that stupid probably wouldn't be spending money on it anyway. I didn't buy box sets of bleach to watch stupid, annoying mod souls play tsundere with Ichigo, I bought them to watch him bankai the shit out of some hollows. That's my opinion on the naruto part of this statement. As for fansubs, the actual physical fansubs themselves are not the problem. It's been said a million times in this thread, but I'll say it again - fansubs are what allow overseas viewers to find shows they are interested in, and without them, sales would definitely go down much farther than they are now. Fansubs and fansubbing groups are not what is causing the anime industry to decline sales-wise. The problem is coming from three places: the studios that are releasing the DVDs and merchandise; the overseas distributors; and the consumers. Here is what I believe needs to change. There needs to be more incentive to buy DVDs in general. Whether its an overall increase in quality or special DVD only features, someone in the creation process needs to realize that no one really wants to watch, let alone spend money on, stupid, boring, senseless fillers. This can only be fixed by the people who actually produce the anime. The second problem is the overseas distributors. From what I've heard, it's extremely difficult and expensive to buy physical copies of shows you like if you live anywhere but Japan or America; and even then, it is still too inconvenient for most people, especially when it is faster and freer (freer is a real word - did you know that?) to download illegal episodes online. Somehow, legal distributors have to find a way to at least come close to matching the speed and quality of illegal fansubbers, as well as providing a way for fans who live outside Japan and the US to buy anime in a realistic manner. The third thing that needs to change is consumer attitudes. If you sincerely enjoy watching anime, and you want it to continue to be produced, then you need to give back in some way. This is simple cause and effect. It's incredible to me that anyone would honestly think that the industry could keep making shows if everyone just watched free pirated fansubs. I don't want to preach here, and I know a lot of people in this community do spend money when they can, but honestly, if the numbers say we aren't spending enough to keep this art form alive, then we need to do more. If you like a series and you spend money on it, the studio will see that you spent money on it and not the complete Naruto box set collection and think "huh, maybe we should make more like (insert your favorite anime here) and less like Naruto." And lastly, a word on subs vs dubs. I know all too well how terribly painful english dubs can be, but from a realistic perspective, it's the best way to do it. A lot can be lost in translation, especially in shows that rely on verbal humor and satire. However, the goal of releasing the show in a dubbed format is to draw in as many potential consumers as possible, not to please the hardcore fans. If someone who knew very little about anime in general saw a show on late night TV that caught his or her attention, this person would be much more likely to pursue it if he or she could understand what the characters were saying. The sad truth is that to many potential fans, reading subtitles is a chore. However, I haven't seen an english dub released in the past 10 years that does not also include original japanese audio with subtitles. There isn't really an argument here - if you want to support a show, you'll buy it in a format that is available to you, even if you never watch the english dubs. The original post cited Pokémon as a successful franchise; but the original pokémon is home to some of the most abhorrent americanizations and mistranslations of all time (see also: Donut, goooo!!!!!1). This doesn't change the fact that pikachu won the hearts (and wallets) of tens of thousands of american kids and adults. Basically I just hope everyone can find a way to do their part in this and we can continue to produce and watch great anime in the future. The TLDR version of this post is that I spent 2 and a half hours writing and rewriting it and that is the reason I haven't made any friends in the 7 months since I moved to this new school |
Mar 29, 2011 5:21 AM
#119
torgon02 said: Just because it's cheaper now than it used to be doesn't mean it's cheap now. It's definitely within reason, but they should still come down some more.I get a laugh every time someone says DVDs are too expensive. When I started collecting, anime was $45 - $70 + shipping for 1-3 episodes on VHS. I never did work up the nerve to spend $180 for all 4 episodes of Macross Plus (that's $45 per episode for those who don't like math), but I did pay $50 for Tenchi the Movie 2 (I think it was about $67 after shipping, taxes, and border fees). Now complete season box sets for most series cost $30- $70. $360 for a new 12 episode series 20 years ago vs. $30 for a new 12 episode series now... I think DVDs are affordable. |
Mar 29, 2011 5:34 AM
#120
I think they're overacting ... I'd buy lots anime dvd's , goods and manga , if they'd be available in my country =/ ... ordering through mail sucks because you can't check the quality , they take a while to arrive , sometimes they arrived damaged etc.... |
Mar 29, 2011 6:59 AM
#121
selective_yellow said: ... 3d is shit. This |
Mar 29, 2011 7:40 AM
#122
Mar 29, 2011 9:03 AM
#123
TeamFortress2 said: Fansubs get me interested in stuff, not the other way around. |
Sorry, Image unavailable. Only awesome people can see it. |
Mar 29, 2011 11:12 AM
#124
I don't buy anime DVD's because i live in Russia(fail) and i don't have money for all this stuff i want(double fail). |
Mar 29, 2011 12:29 PM
#125
I'm actually glad they are in a crisis. People should stop buying their crap otherwise they'll keep producing shit endlessly. Maybe they'll start doing something decent for a change. |
Mar 29, 2011 2:20 PM
#126
Cashdaxxx said: facepalm.jpg ILOVEMY WIKIPEDIA said: Anime is commonly defined as animation originating in Japan. In English-speaking countries, anime is also referred to as "Japanese animation". and Cartoons is FYI generally means WESTERN ANIMATION(as an accepted term) put wiki as a reference on your quote you nerd.. Wow, you're retarded. Did you even read what I typed? Onibokusu said: You've got to be a complete imbecile to think that anime and cartoons are separate entities. Anime is just a more specific term, referring to Japanese Animation, whereas 'cartoon' encompasses all forms of animation (and several forms art. Read it again, maybe three times so it'll stick. thepsychoticone said: Just because it's cheaper now than it used to be doesn't mean it's cheap now. It's definitely within reason, but they should still come down some more. No, anime is pretty cheap these days. The day I could buy an entire 26 episode season for $13 (RRP) was the day R1 DVDs became cheap. |
no-thanksMar 29, 2011 2:23 PM
Mar 29, 2011 3:13 PM
#127
4. "Fansub as free publicity" is unreal Yeah, I'm sure that $400 Blu-ray box set of Kara no Kyoukai would have sold just as well if no one had watched it before... |
Mar 29, 2011 5:16 PM
#128
Mar 29, 2011 5:19 PM
#129
I dunno man. Seeing mechas in 3d fighting can be good but for anything else... meh. |
Mar 29, 2011 6:34 PM
#130
NecoDelero said: This is so true. People fail to see that the only reason anime has become a little cheaper than in the past is because they were forced to by the world economy. Even now they are too expensive to buy at a massive rate. Everyone has other more important things to use their money on. 4. "Fansub as free publicity" is unreal Yeah, I'm sure that $400 Blu-ray box set of Kara no Kyoukai would have sold just as well if no one had watched it before... Also, if we are talking purely in America, I'm pretty sure anime is still stereotyped as a kid's thing. Let me remind you, kids don't work. And parents won't drop down tons of money on "cartoons". In fact, they might be more inclined to buy them a game that will entertain them for weeks and weeks than an anime boxset they are likely to burn through in a few days and never see again. |
Mar 29, 2011 7:23 PM
#131
Onibokusu said: You're really an awesomely epic guy(a). Read the previous spoiler. And I'm also talking about slangs. Cashdaxxx said: Wow, you're retarded. Did you even read what I typed?facepalm.jpg ILOVEMY WIKIPEDIA said: Anime is commonly defined as animation originating in Japan. In English-speaking countries, anime is also referred to as "Japanese animation". and Cartoons is FYI generally means WESTERN ANIMATION(as an accepted term) put wiki as a reference on your quote you nerd.. You don't understand slang??, wiki it lol SuperSaiyen said: Will do...though they should just concentrate on emphasizing scenes through 3d(like Melancholy S2; Endless 8) rather than 3d(ing) the whole thing.I dunno man. Seeing mechas in 3d fighting can be good but for anything else... meh. |
CashdaxMar 29, 2011 7:31 PM
Mar 29, 2011 9:00 PM
#132
Is piracy really sending the entertainment industry broke or are the claimed hundreds of millions of dollars in annual losses and thousands of job cuts just a load of hogwash? The industry is constantly warning of an impending piracy apocalypse but continues to notch up healthy revenues and record box office takings. From bogus figures to highly exaggerated press releases, analysts and academics claim there is no limit to the hyperbole record labels and movie studios will use in their relentless lobbying campaign. Advertisement: Story continues below With the industry reeling after repeatedly failing to use the courts to force internet providers to penalise illegal downloaders, it is now trying to persuade the government to implement new legislation that would crack down on internet users. But critics say the industry isn't playing fair and should refresh its business model for the digital age instead of stretching the truth in order to scare the government into implementing knee-jerk legislation. Fudging the numbers This month, a new lobbying group, the Australian Content Industry Group (ACIG), released new statistics to The Age, which claimed piracy was costing Australian content industries $900 million a year and 8000 jobs. The report claims 4.7 million Australian internet users engaged in illegal downloading and this was set to increase to 8 million by 2016. By that time, the claimed losses to piracy would jump to $5.2 billion a year and 40,000 jobs. But the report, which is just 12 pages long, is fundamentally flawed. It takes a model provided by an earlier European piracy study (which itself has been thoroughly debunked) and attempts to shoe-horn in extrapolated Australian figures that are at best highly questionable and at worst just made up. What's more, the report attempts to provide a five-year forecast based on a single year of data and also attempts to calculate lost Commonwealth tax revenue. It suggests there is a direct correlation between internet traffic growth and lost jobs in the content industry - but includes no new research into jobs in the entertainment industry to back this up. "The main objective is to lobby politicians with this and to scare the public into compliance," IBRS analyst Guy Cranswick said. "The quality of data and analysis is very weak as its political objective is so clear. "It does not use actual ABS data but data taken from Europe. It's an elemental statistical error, it's fudging with numbers to come out with a figure which is 'kinda sorta' plausible." The report was compiled by Sphere Analysis on behalf of ACIG, which comprises the main industry bodies for the music, games, software and book industries. The author of the Sphere report, Emilio Ferrrer, said he believed the European study was credible and thorough and stood by his estimates for Australia, which he believed were conservative. Ferrer said that, even if the numbers were not completely correct, there was no denying that piracy was a significant issue for the industry that was only expected to increase with the arrival of the National Broadband Network. Graphs from the ACIG report showing estimated losses to piracy. Graphs from the ACIG report showing estimated losses to piracy. Twisting the government's arm Despite the flaws in the data, ACIG appears to be getting through to the government, with the Attorney-General, Robert McClelland, using the report in a recent speech to highlight the threat of online piracy. The tactic appears to be working overseas too with industry-generated reports succeeding in pushing governments in US, Britain, France and Ireland to act with onerous new laws. ACIG's report is far from the first Australian research to be criticised. Virtually every industry-commissioned report on the effects of piracy has been ridiculed by analysts. The Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT), another local anti-piracy agency, released a report in February that claimed piracy had cost the economy $1.37 billion in lost revenue and 6100 jobs from July 2009 until July 2010. The study, based on a survey of 3500 people, has also been heavily criticised by analysts, copyright lawyers and the online users' lobby group Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA). "The reports always headline 'jobs lost to piracy', but this has no basis in fact," EFA chairman Colin Jacobs said. "Money not spent by downloaders on movie tickets is almost certainly spent elsewhere on other goods and services that may be more efficient at creating jobs in Australia." Essentially, piracy is a reallocation of income, not a loss to the larger national economy. Jacobs also noted that the content industry was mostly based in the US so revenue was largely flowing offshore. He pointed to a research report from Holland that found piracy was actually beneficial to the Dutch economy (a Canadian study has come to a similar conclusion). Other studios have found that illegal downloaders actually spent the most on music and that pirated copies served to market the legitimate versions. 'Self-serving hyperbole' The Australian Institute of Criminology for one has been reluctant to take the industry at its word when it comes to piracy losses. "Although these estimates provide a general indication of the scale of the problem, the validity of the data is open to some debate," the AIC wrote in its latest report on intellectual property crime in Australia. The AIC has previously debunked claims that piracy was linked to organised crime and in a draft report leaked in 2006 said industry-provided piracy statistics were "self-serving hyperbole". "The AIC's frustration was largely based on the fact that none of these groups will expose their reports to genuine peer review or analysis," said Kimberlee Weatherall, a senior law lecturer at the University of Queensland, who specialises in copyright law and is highly critical of the industry's piracy reports. "When the US Government Accountability Office (GAO) looked into it at the request of US Congress, it expressed doubt about most of the industry-produced figures." Piracy figures derived by the entertainment industry have also been heavily criticised in the US and Europe. In some instances, the industry has admitted to grossly inflating its numbers. Australia's biggest pirate? Fat chance In February last year, the anti-piracy arm of the music industry, Music Industry Piracy Investigations (MIPI), put out a thunderous press release claiming it had helped police "shut down one of Australia's largest illegal music burning operations" in Melbourne. Acting on information from MIPI, police seized "close to 100 CD burners and approximately 25,000 discs containing pirate music housed in a suburban CD store". MIPI's general manager, Sabiene Heindl, said at the time: "This is one of the largest and most blatant illegal music burning labs that we have seen for some time." It was only this year that the case finally ground its way through the courts and further details were released. Of the 25,000 "pirate" CDs that MIPI claimed it seized, 14,600 were blanks, while the remaining discs were mostly of Asian artists which the store, Lucky Bubble, had a licence to reproduce. Less than 100 of the discs were proven to be pirated copies and the charges were dropped to the lowest possible level. The manager of the store, who claims the handful of pirated discs were placed in his shop by staff, in the end was let go with a $1500 fine. It's a far cry from the hundreds of thousands of dollars in penalties and years in jail that MIPI warned about in its press release. The police have recently returned the man's burners and almost all of the seized discs. "This whole operation from the start has just been a monumental stuff-up by MIPI," said barrister Doug Potter, who represented the defence in this matter but has 18 years' experience with Victoria Police and has previously helped MIPI with its prosecutions. "This bloke's got a legitimate licence to be selling material and they've tried to characterise him as the greatest pirate in Australia. If their assessment is right they don't have a piracy problem, it's as simple as that." Mr Potter said he believed that MIPI was trying to "justify their existence" by pursuing minor pirates and raiding the occasional market stall. He said most piracy was occurring on the internet and much of this MIPI was powerless to stop. "Everyone's sitting on their computers anonymously pirating stuff and they're going after someone with just 96 discs and proclaiming a great victory - the reality is that hard copies of these things are going the way of the dinosaur," he said. The Lucky Bubble case is reminiscent of the case of 24-year-old Queensland man James Burt, who was forced to pay $1.5 million to Nintendo in a piracy case last year for uploading a copy of a new game to the internet after he managed to buy it before the official release date. Nintendo claimed he was a major pirate who had caused it significant losses, but Burt's father said he was simply acting under peer pressure from his friends. As for the losses, the game, New Super Mario Bros, went on to earn $20 million in revenue in just seven weeks, making it one of the fastest-selling games of all time. Studios still raking it in But despite the presence of internet piracy, is the local industry actually suffering? The results are mixed. The Australian box office set its third consecutive record in 2010, reporting revenues of $1.128 billion – a 4 per cent increase on the previous result. Figures released by the Australian Recording Industry Association show that, between 2009 and 2010, although the quantity of music sold rose almost 10 per cent, the dollar value of these sales dropped from $446 million to $384 million. Sales of DVDs, Blu-ray discs and other packaged media are holding strong, with 2010 revenues at $1.29 billion – just 6 per cent lower than in 2009. Mr Cranswick believes shifting the blame for lost sales on to piracy betrays a deficit of "imagination and insight" by the entertainment industry. There were legions of other reasons that could account for changing fortunes including technology, demography, usage patterns and price models. The music industry appears to be the worst affected by falling revenue but there are signs it will soon turn the corner thanks to new subscription-based online music services. A recent Ovum research report estimated the digital music industry would grow by 60 per cent to $US20 billion by 2015. Mr Jacobs points out that despite its profits continuing to grow on an overall basis, the industry for a long time has made a lot of noise about the end of days. It has continuously protested against new technologies and lobbied governments to impose restrictions. "The marketers of entertainment should ask themselves - if a quarter of Australian internet users are engaging in unauthorised downloads as they claim, is it because Australians are a bunch of immoral criminals? Or could there be another explanation?" he asked. "Rather than treating the impending roll-out of the NBN as an apocalypse of piracy, the industry should be embracing the technology to provide a more compelling offering to their Australian customers. Sadly, it seems that innovation is harder than putting lawyers in charge." STOLEN FROM EFA its not entirly unreleated but finger pointing at DOWNLOADERS IS WRONG! |
Corpse69Mar 30, 2011 4:40 AM
I signed my screen and now its all smeary "When you meet your God tell him to leave me alone." check out my bloghttp://corpse69.wordpress.com/ fix MAL already |
Mar 29, 2011 10:05 PM
#133
1-alrite i agree with every1 about the anime industry pumping out crap story lines cause almost all the newly put out animes and yet to be aired anime are either based on dating sims or fuC'd up ntr eroge and most of this years line up is unwatchable except 4 gintama,beezelbub,world god only knows,level e.on a note these are mostly comedy's and i want to watch something that really eiother messes with your mind or gives that food for thought but lets keep pur fingers crossed that the anime industry recovers and put out line ups that take our attention............................ 2-on qnother note the reason that anime does not fare well in the western market is sometimes crappy voice acting and seletion if they want to fare well with the western market each japanese animation branch should just open there own branches in otherrespective countrys and control there own product instead of passing responsability to other companings for example when 4kids picked up one piece they ruined it with crappy editing and voice acting.............................. |
Mar 29, 2011 11:55 PM
#134
1. Did he take into account that Naruto sucks donkey ass? 2. I'm sure these guys are poor and destitute, living out of cardboard boxes and such. 3. LOL yeah, we can't afford to enforce worldwide anti piracy measures, so of course Crunchyroll will be able to do so, problem solved. 4. If there were no fansubs, I sure as hell wouldn't watch anime. Dubs and studio subs are terrible, particularly with comedies, which are so overly localized you aren't even hearing jokes that are similar to the original (or funny for that matter). 5. 3D Disney and Pixar movies obviously have the same audience as most anime. This guy is brilliant. |
Mar 30, 2011 4:02 AM
#135
oh wow...even to this day they don't get that the fansubbers are the main reason as to why we actually buy their shit? I for one can't read japanese, except for all the recurring lines (kawaii...you get the picture), so I can only turn to fansubs cause I wanna see if I like it or not. I do buy some stuff, but if that thing has fillers like naruto and bleach does, ofc I will avoid them. And 3D dominating 2D anime-wise....in what universe? Anime is 2D, and should stay that way. 2D > 3D and everybody knows that. 3D anime is just shit....the only 3D I would watch are CAPCOM's resident evil, and if Blizzard decided to make a Starcraft or Diablo 3D animation. |
Mar 30, 2011 6:03 AM
#136
Sorry, what was that about fansubs killing the industry? 4Kids Gets Sued By Japanese Producers For Illegal Transactions of Yu-Gi-Oh |
What a day! What a lovely Day! |
Mar 30, 2011 9:36 AM
#137
Onibokusu said: Cashdaxxx said: Anime != Cartoons Anime > Cartoons(even in 3D) I've seen 3D before and most of it is shit when you compare it to it's 2D counterpart. Last time I checked, Pixar CGI films don't look like shit compared to 2D animation. It's pretty much superior in every way. Even Imagi's Astroy Boy CGI film is vastly superior to Japanese Animation in terms of quality. Give the same budget for an anime (movie/series) than any budget Pixar has to release a 1 hour 20 minutes movies and the 2d will be better than 3d. 3d is overrated. Also since Pixar is a property of Disney, it is distribued all over the world, unlike japanese studios. This is biased. And when Ghibli finally make a deal with Disney, Disney doesnt even distribute the movie properly because they do not want anime to be popular, it will hurt their cartoon/3D shit sales. |
Mar 30, 2011 12:53 PM
#138
I haven't seen many 3d anime and if fan subs are hurting small companies its probably because when people see licensed they expect dubs, not more subs. |
Mar 30, 2011 6:05 PM
#139
@ZaggyPlushie I dare not debate the "2D is better / 3D is superior" argument since it's subject to the viewer. I will also abstain from commenting about an industry in which I do not take part as an insider. What I do comment though, having gone trough a pretty harsh and lengthy Maya training (that is one of the most used software for 3D CG and movie effects) after I left college (in which I did a fair bit of 2D animation... crappy ones mind you ¬¬), is that your argument about the budget is completely out of touch with reality. A 3D animator takes less time/budget and experience to be "fully trained", thus making hiring cheaper. It also takes less budget to maintain and a competent one can produce the equivalent of an entire week of a competent 2D animator in a day. There is also the "in between factor"... in 2D you need a whole workforce just to do the labor work of producing 24 frames/sec, in 3D after the animation curves and blend shapes are all set (usually by one person mind you) you are golden. These numbers obviously vary greatly, but in summary, a 3D movie is MUCH MUCH more profitable to a company than a 2D one is. You can produce it faster, with less trained (not less skilled) workforce and end up with a technically superior project... at least on what is related to the glaring eyes from the average population that goes to the theaters watch blockbuster crap (that is really where the huge cash resides on). This gets more attenuated with every passing year as well, with tons of 3D animators starting to flood the market and good 2D ones becoming an extinct breed, making even harder to get a decent education as well (hell, I still use books that where written in the 60's about 2D animation technics, it's like no one bothers to write them anymore... or simply can't due to lack of skill ¬¬). A pretty recent example of this is Disney and "The Prince and the Frog". They had to bring retired people just to get the team going since they couldn't find capable new blood... a western scenario? Yes. But not much different from what some big mangakas/animators from Japan tell us. -- Regarding the Madhouse staff remarks: 1. "Even Naruto cannot make money" Big shounen is a terrible example. The canon is good? No, its terrific!!! I love every single second of the canon from Naruto for instance. But the bulk of the show is comprised of dreadful fillers. Paying for 300 episodes but only getting 150 watchable ones? No thanks. 2. Small-sized producers are helpless against fansubs Good ones can make money, stupid ones will be subjected to Darwin. There are a hand full of working projects both on music publishing and movie producing that not only live with "piracy" but embrace it. Even manga/anime is starting to drift towards that trend so I wish they would just let this dead subject die... the day will come when a decent proposition (hopefully) will be made and people will abandon fansubs , and in that day their customers will flock away from the free landscape... the ones that don't, well, they weren't your customers to begin with. 3. Cooperation with Crunchyroll didn't work well Does online streaming brings less revenue than TV or is it plainly unprofitable? In a reality where TV as a whole is getting dated I think he shouldn't even bother with the answer thought ¬¬ 4. 4. "Fansub as free publicity" is unreal Awareness of a product is the only thing that will make you sell it. That said I am still a bit on the fence regarding fansub. I use them extensively and I love them so much for what they bring to me, but at the same time the more my disposable income grows, the more I start to get pissed at the frivolity of some people that take what they get for granted... not only from the work the fansub poured into the project, but obviously from all the blood and sweat that went into the conception of the anime in the first place. 5. 2D anime is getting obsolete This one I touched already on my first response and I kinda agree with him on this one (to my dismay since I love so much 2D animation). 3D is just more profitable, specially on the west where they also have to deal with the stigma associated with "cartoons". |
"There is no stupid questions, only stupid people." |
Mar 30, 2011 9:48 PM
#140
Cashdaxxx said: You're really an awesomely epic guy(a). Read the previous spoiler. And I'm also talking about slangs. Japanese Animation/Anime isn't slang, it's a contraction that refers to Japanese cartoons specifically. They're still cartoons, they're just from Japan. All anime are cartoons, but not all cartoons are anime. babler said: 4. If there were no fansubs, I sure as hell wouldn't watch anime. Dubs and studio subs are terrible, particularly with comedies, which are so overly localized you aren't even hearing jokes that are similar to the original (or funny for that matter). I'll just respond for the majority that don't use MAL just to keep track of fansub groups: Actually buy a DVD/BR. Really, basing your opinion on Americanisation (which hasn't been happening for just under two decades now) makes no sense. It's an opinion, yes. A opinion on dated anime that can't be applied to anime adapted in the last decade. |
Mar 31, 2011 1:35 AM
#141
3D? I heard that there was a new 3D version of ghost in the shell solid state society this month but I still prefer 2D I honestly dislike this new 3D trend that seems to be the most "hip" of things today as for anime fandubs being problems well I just borrow them from the library and proceed to buy the actual thing if I'am interested |
"Where will a newborn go from here? The net is vast and infinite" - Motoko Kusanagi |
Apr 1, 2011 11:08 AM
#142
If 2D gets taken over by 3D, it'll be anime no more. |
Jun 18, 2011 5:51 PM
#143
All the 3D anime I have seen, with the exception of perhaps one or two movies, were absolutely horrible - its not the same medium once you go 3D - it becomes something else, in my opinion. |
Jun 19, 2011 2:08 AM
#144
Jun 19, 2011 4:33 AM
#145
WTF, there's 3D anime!? I have been out of the loop too long it seems... |
"I'm starting to think mal is run by Xinil generating electricity on a bicycle." - idklol |
Jun 19, 2011 12:28 PM
#146
Jun 19, 2011 12:55 PM
#147
fansubs just make anime as free as watching it on TV, and with Tivo they can record and save it too. so tired of the doomspeak about fansubs |
Jun 19, 2011 9:18 PM
#148
The day when i have extra cash to blow and anime producers start adding English subs to their DVS/ Blu-Ray releases is the day I'll start importing... I'm not buying any anime DVDs when i can't understand them. I'm also not going to wait years for something the US might not even license... Just saying.... 3D will not beat 2D as long as the 3D looks like shit! I'm thinking of CGI, not 3D... |
GogettersJun 19, 2011 9:45 PM
Jun 19, 2011 11:33 PM
#149
I can see a collector doing that, but that just seems pointless and a waste of money to me... Why buy the DVD/BDs when you would just be watching the fansubbed version anyways? It just seems a lot easier if the anime producers would toss the subs from some subgroup onto the DVD/BDs before releasing them. I think I recall Maikaze doing something similar with A Summer Day's Dream. |
GogettersJun 19, 2011 11:45 PM
Jun 19, 2011 11:48 PM
#150
3D anime? When can everyone afford to play those at home. |
More topics from this board
» Voice Actress Fairouz Ai Restricts Activities Due to PTSD DiagnosisVindstot - Dec 31, 2024 |
21 |
by Adnash
»»
19 minutes ago |
|
» Video Game 'Ghost of Tsushima' Gets Anime in 2027Vindstot - 33 minutes ago |
4 |
by deg
»»
21 minutes ago |
|
» Light Novel 'Kizoku Tensei' Gets TV AnimeVindstot - Jan 4 |
14 |
by Vipadus
»»
56 minutes ago |
|
» Winter 2025 Simulcast ListSnow - Jan 1 |
8 |
by yamiyugi101
»»
3 hours ago |
|
» Second Season of New 'Ranma ½' TV Anime in ProductionVindstot - Dec 21, 2024 |
10 |
by Pit93
»»
11 hours ago |